Next Article in Journal
Silyldienolates in Organocatalytic Enantioselective Vinylogous Mukaiyama-Type Reactions: A Review
Next Article in Special Issue
Development and Validation of Multi-Residue Method for Drugs Analysis in Human Feces by Liquid Chromatography–Tandem Mass Spectrometry
Previous Article in Journal
Flavonoids as Inhibitors of Bacterial Efflux Pumps
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 26
Issue 22
10.3390/molecules26226903
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Adulteration of Weight Loss Supplements by the Illegal Addition of Synthetic Pharmaceuticals

by
Ammar A. Jairoun
1,2,*,
Sabaa Saleh Al-Hemyari
1,3,
Moyad Shahwan
4,5 and
Sa’ed H. Zyoud
6,7
1
Discipline of Social and Administrative Pharmacy, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University Sains Malaysia, Pulau Pinang 1800, Malaysia
2
Health and Safety Department, Dubai Municipality, Dubai P.O. Box 67, United Arab Emirates
3
Pharmacy Department, Emirates Health Services Establishment, Dubai P.O. Box 1853, United Arab Emirates
4
Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Ajman University, Ajman P.O. Box 346, United Arab Emirates
5
Center of Medical and Bio-Allied Health Sciences Research, Ajman University, Ajman P.O. Box 346, United Arab Emirates
6
Poison Control and Drug Information Center (PCDIC), College of Medicine and Health Sciences, An-Najah National University, Nablus 44839, Palestine
7
Clinical Research Centre, An-Najah National University Hospital, Nablus 44839, Palestine
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2021, 26(22), 6903; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26226903
Submission received: 28 July 2021 / Revised: 30 October 2021 / Accepted: 4 November 2021 / Published: 16 November 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Pharmaceuticals, Emerging Contaminants, Analysis and Presence in Food and Environmental Samples)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Weight loss supplements that have illegal additives of pharmaceutical drugs or analogues have additional health risks, and customers may not be aware of what they are taking. This research is an essential investigation and quantification of illegally added pharmaceuticals or prescription medications, specifically fluoxetine, phenolphthalein, and sibutramine, in herbal weight loss supplements offered for sale in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). In this case, 137 weight loss supplements were collected and analyzed in this study. Reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography with UV absorption detection coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (RP-HPLC-MS/MS) analyses were used to determine the presence of the pharmaceutical chemicals. Among the weight loss supplements, 15.3% (95% CI: 9.2–21.4) contained undeclared sibutramine, 13.9% (95% CI: 8.01–19.7) contained undeclared phenolphthalein, and 5.1% (95% CI: 1.4–8.8) contained undeclared fluoxetine. Amongst all weight loss supplements, 17.5% (95% CI: 11.07–24) contained significant concentrations of either sibutramine, phenolphthalein, or fluoxetine. Whilst weight loss herbal supplements offered for sale in the UAE have relatively low percentages of undeclared pharmaceuticals, many people take several different supplements daily and may encounter quite high levels of combined exposure to toxic compounds.

1. Introduction

Excess weight or obesity is a serious public health problem for adults worldwide. In the 2018 global estimates by the World Health Organization, over 1.9 billion adults (39%) in 2017 were regarded as overweight [1]. It has been predicted that the 2020 figures will show an increase to 60% [2]. Obesity plays a central role in numerous health conditions, including heart disease, stroke, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, erectile dysfunction, type II diabetes, high blood pressure, and cancer amongst others [2].
When weight loss supplements are adulterated, there are two general motivations for the adulteration. In economic adulteration, a cheaper ingredient replaces more expensive ingredients claimed on the label. In pharmaceutical adulteration, an active drug will be added to an allegedly botanical supplement, e.g., sibutramine might be added to a weight loss supplement that claims to be purely “natural.
Numerous people choose herbal products that claim to promote weight loss with the mistaken belief that such products are safer than normal pharmaceuticals. In fact, nutraceuticals may include ingredients on the FDA list of prohibited compounds, such as phenolphthalein and sibutramine [3]. Weight loss nutraceuticals may contain chemicals that have numerous side effects that can cause cancer, heart failure, and other potentially fatal outcomes [4]. Furthermore, these products sometimes contain stimulants, e.g., sibutramine or caffeine, that can have numerous side effects, including depression, insomnia, thoughts of suicide, and other fatal problems [5]. For these reasons, these products should be avoided by individuals who suffer from anxiety, panic attacks, hypertension, or heart conditions [4].
The last few years have seen a significant increase in the number of dietary supplements purchased. Unethical manufacturers or distributors purposely add pharmaceuticals to herbal dietary supplements to create instant pharmacological reactions or boost the biological action of the supplement [6,7]. Some of these products can contain a multiplicity of analogues or adulterants. Dietary supplements that have illegal additives of pharmaceutical drugs or analogues have additional health risks, and customers may not be aware of what they are taking [8,9,10,11,12].
Such additives pose a significant risk to public health, particularly long-term consumption [2,13]. Synthetic substances and/or prescription drug analogues in herbal weight loss products are concerning for all global health agencies [14,15,16]. Due to this, the WHO [9], Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and European Medicines Agency [10] have promulgated guidelines for the ways in which herbal medicines can be used safely and appropriately [17,18].
Another problem with these adulterated supplements is that they are often marketed and sold via the Internet or social media, where they can avoid strict controls and do not necessarily have to satisfy safety/control testing prior to marketing and selling [4].
Numerous stakeholders have issued reports on many occasions where herbal weight loss products that have been adulterated [19,20,21]. Amongst the undeclared active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) found in herbal products are lorcaserin, fluoxetine, phenolphthalein, sildenafil, and sibutramine [22].
In Korea, chlorosibutramine (an analogue of sibutramine) has been found to be added to weight loss products [19]. In an investigation of weight loss supplements sold in Brazil to look for undeclared APIs, Neves and Caldas [23] found fenproporex, phenolphthalein, sibutramine, and amfepramone. Wang et al. [24] found phenolphthalein, N-mono-desmethylsibutramine, and sibutramine in herbal weight loss products. These results demonstrate that consumers could, without knowing, be consuming products that control different levels of prescription drugs, controlled substances, and/or active ingredients that have not been thoroughly tested or researched. Such products can cause serious damage to a person’s health.
In the UAE regulatory regime, the manufacturers of dietary supplements must supply evidence that their product manufacturing environment guarantees their products are safe and pure; any new product must be tested in municipal laboratories. Nevertheless, despite these safeguards, there have been cases where microorganism-contaminated dietary supplements have gained approval and been offered for sale [25,26,27].
The Dubai Municipality has 11 circulars on its webpages that worn against the trade, sale, or use of weight loss products that have not been granted a license by the relevant authority and that may contain ingredients that are banned across the world; these ingredients could have an adverse impact on the health and safety of consumers [28,29].
With the globalization and increasing value of the market for weight loss supplements, and with the possible dangers to public health of the inadvertent ingestion of unmeasured quantities of pharmaceuticals, cases have been rising of individuals having an adverse reaction to weight loss supplements and even suffering mortality as a result of the products being contaminated or adulterated rather than a reaction to the ingredients claimed on the product. In certain instances, this is a result of manufacturers intentionally defrauding the public by producing a poor-quality product, using sophisticated techniques to circumvent regulatory and oversight procedures.
In light of these facts and due to the scarcity of scientific studies in this field in the UAE, this study hypothesized that weight loss herbal supplements offered for sale in the UAE have relatively considerable percentages of undeclared pharmaceuticals. This observational retrospective prevalence study is an essential investigation and quantification of illegally added pharmaceuticals or prescription medications, specifically fluoxetine, phenolphthalein, and sibutramine, in herbal weight loss supplements offered for sale in the UAE. The findings will help to demonstrate the most common ingredients in weight loss supplements offered for sale in the UAE, to show whether extant regulations are being properly observed and to help the regulatory bodies in developing a risk assessment module for the safety of weight loss supplements

2. Results

2.1. Sample Description

Table 1 shows the sample baseline characteristics of the weight loss supplements. In this case, 137 weight loss supplements were collected and analyzed in this study. The dosage forms of the weight loss supplement were 87 (63.5%) capsules, 31 (22.6%) tablets, and 19 (13.9%) teabags. Three samples (2.2%) were made in Canada, 67 (48.9%) were made in the USA, 22 (16.1%) were made in the European Union, seven (5.1%) were made in China, 6 (4.4%) were made in Malaysia, four (2.9%) were made in India, four (2.9%) were made in the UAE, and 24 (17.5%) did not have a declared country of origin.

2.2. Assessment of Hidden Prescription Drugs and Chemicals in the Weight Loss Supplements

Table 2 summarizes the number of test results in which the measured prescription drugs and chemicals were below the limit of detection (LOD). Among the weight loss supplements, 15.3% (95% CI: 9.2–21.4) contained undeclared sibutramine, 13.9% (95% CI: 8.01–19.7) contained undeclared phenolphthalein, and 5.1% (95% CI: 1.4–8.8) contained undeclared fluoxetine. Of the 137 weight loss supplements, seven (5.1%) included one undeclared prescription drug/chemical, 11 (8%) included two undeclared prescription drugs/chemicals, and six (4.4%) included three undeclared prescription drugs/chemicals. Amongst all of the weight loss supplements, 17.5% (95% CI: 11.07–24) contained significant concentrations of either sibutramine, phenolphthalein, or fluoxetine (Table 3). The prevalence of undeclared prescription drugs/chemicals in these weight loss supplements categorized by the sample characteristics of each sample is provided in Table 4. Supplementary Materials shows the Chromatograms for some analyzed weight loss supplements (Supplementary Figure S1).

2.3. Comparison of Undeclared Prescription Drugs/Chemicals in Weight Loss Supplements According to Sample Characteristics

Table 5 presents the distribution of undeclared prescription drugs/chemicals according to the sample characteristics. The table also provides the estimates with the p-values. These p-values were obtained from the results of the chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests. There was a statistical association between the labelled country of origin and the undeclared prescription drug/chemical (p < 0.001). An undeclared prescription drug/chemical was more prevalent in samples with an undeclared country of origin (66.7%) than in the samples with a clear country of origin (7.1%). However, there was no statistically significant association between dosage form and an undeclared prescription drug/chemical (p = 0.178).

3. Discussion

Weight loss nutraceuticals have become increasingly popular and more widely available, so there has been a rise in the number of adulterated products containing pharmaceutical chemicals or prescription drugs. Such contaminated products are a global problem, and they pose a health risk to those who consume them. The primary aim of this research was to investigate whether nutraceuticals offered for weight loss in the UAE are adulterated with pharmaceutical chemicals or prescription drugs.
This research analyzed 137 nutraceuticals sold as weight loss products; 17.5% were shown to have adulterations of significant quantities of one of the three drugs we were looking for. This level of adulteration is lower than that found in past research. In a study of 160 herbal weight loss supplements, Hachem et al. [22] revealed that over 50% had been adulterated with one of six different pharmaceutical chemicals. Research by the FDA of the USA showed that 572 dietary supplements were found to have been adulterated using pharmaceutical chemicals not listed as ingredients (228 of these were sold as weight loss products) in the years 2007 to 2014 [30]. Research carried out in Iran found that 72% of 61 products sold for weight loss contained pharmaceutical chemicals [31]. Research in Korea found nine separate additives in 76 out of 370 samples [32].
The fact that such a comparatively low rate of adulteration with pharmaceutical chemicals has been found in weight loss nutraceuticals offered for sale in the UAE may be attributed to the regulations in the country, with municipalities and health regulators insisting that every dietary supplement sold must participate in registration to prove that they are efficacious, of acceptable quality, and safe.
Sibutramine was the most widely used adulterant in the weight loss products tested, followed by phenolphthalein and fluoxetine. Sibutramine was found in 21 samples at varying levels (0.14–16,823.3 mg/kg). These findings are consistent with past research, where sibutramine was found to be the most frequent illegal additive in herbal weight loss preparations [19,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39]. Sibutramine is added to dietary supplements promoted for weight loss because it exploits noradrenaline and serotonin reuptake inhibitors, leading to increases in the synaptic concentration of these neurotransmitters and subsequently activating the α-adrenoceptors, β-adrenoceptors, and serotonin receptors. These chemical effects cause people to feel more sated and burn more energy, which leads to a drop in body weight [34]. Amongst the damaging side effects of sibutramine are hepatitis, psychosis, arrhythmia, and additional cardiovascular conditions [40]. People who take herbal slimming preparations that have undeclared sibutramine may experience several side effects, from headaches to serious cardiovascular disturbance, depending on the amount of drug ingested [41,42,43].
The second most frequent illegal additive in herbal weight loss products in this research was the laxative phenolphthalein, which was found in 19 samples at levels of 1.9–13,218.8 mg/kg. This drug is often found alongside sibutramine as an illegal adulterant to weight loss supplements. These findings are consistent with the results of many other studies [35,36,44,45]. People who take herbal slimming preparations that contain undeclared phenolphthalein may face an increased risk of cancer [35,36,44].
The third most frequent illegal additive to have weight loss products in this research was fluoxetine. This was found in seven samples at levels between 12 and 193.97 mg/kg. This is in line with the results of an Iranian study [46].
It is a matter of serious concern that this research found six samples (4.4%) containing undeclared pharmaceutical chemicals and 11 (8%) containing more than one undeclared pharmaceutical chemical. There is potential for worry about the misuse of these diet products, as users could believe that ingesting more could accelerate the weight loss process, and this could cause addiction or toxic overdose. Potentially fatal results could occur from just one dose of a product that contains these chemical additives, and because consumers may believe the products’ claims to be safe, the consumer might take additional doses, which could result in extreme toxicity [47,48].
Even at a low dose, these pharmaceutical additives could be toxic and potentially fatal when taken without proper medical supervision. Matters could be made worse if the person taking the drug is also taking other prescription medication [33,49]. Patients might suffer side effects due to the pharmaceutical adulterants reacting with each other, with other drugs the patient is taking, or with the herbal constituents of the product [50,51].
Consuming excessive amounts of weight loss supplements that have been adulterated with pharmaceuticals creates serious health risks for patients, as it cannot be known what quantity of undeclared pharmaceutical chemicals the product contains [19]. To protect public health and to reinforce legal provisions, it is essential that weight loss dietary supplements should be effectively screened for undeclared pharmaceutical chemicals [52].
The results of this research have shown that it is more likely for a supplement to contain undeclared prescription drugs or chemicals when no country of origin is listed on the product in comparison to those where the country of origin is stated.
There is a necessity for consumers to be made aware of the potentially fatal results of taking illegal nutraceuticals, which are not subjected to regulatory regimes and do not require prescriptions. There should be robust laws developed that ban such illegal products from being sold, marketed, or advertised on television. Last, a reliable method should be employed to detect counterfeit supplements and any adulterants, e.g., simple spectrophotometric analysis and near-infrared spectrophotometry [53,54]. Several novel portable devices to identify drug adulterants are now available [54]. Additional research should be undertaken regarding the ways these devices can be optimized, validated, and modified to assist in the detection of adulterated and counterfeit products [44].
One reason for the adulteration of supplements being hard to regulate is that there are frequent disagreements between regulators, physicians, and manufacturers as to the amount of quality testing required for supplements. The World Health Organization’s Strategy on Traditional Medicines 2014–2023 [55] makes it clear that quality controls are essential for the manufacture of supplements. Botanical extracts and blends offer specific challenges in the detection of misidentified ingredients for contaminants. Both biological and chemical adulterants and contaminants, as they appear in supplements, offer a challenge. With some types of supplements, e.g., those for weight loss, enhanced sexual performance, and enhanced athletic performance, it is especially common to find undeclared extraneous/synthetic substances being added deliberately to cause confusion for analysts; sometimes active synthetic drugs may be added [56].

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Chemicals

Sibutramine hydrochloride monohydrate (CAS#125494-59-9), fluoxetine (CAS# 347 54910-89-3), and phenolphthalein (CAS#77-09-8) (Figure 1) Dr. Ehrenstorfer, U.K. Sibutramine-d6 (CAS#1216544-25-0) and fluoxetine-d5 (CAS#1173020-43-3) from Dr. Ehrenstorfer, U.K were used as internal standards (ISTD). Acetonitrile, ammonium formate, formic acid and methanol were HPLC grade (Merck, Kenilworth, NJ, USA), and the water was deionized (Merck Milli-Q water purification system, Kenilworth, NJ, USA).

4.2. Sample Collection

We found a variety of outlets for weight loss nutraceuticals through searches of local business directories that hold information on healthcare shops, nutrition shops, para-pharmacies, and pharmacies in every emirate of the UAE. We found 1500 such outlets and created a sampling framework on an Excel spreadsheet containing the business name, location, email address, and telephone number. We then created a research sample employing a basic random selection procedure using the ID numbers we had assigned each business, with stratification for type and location. For all chosen locations, random selection was made of a single package of all weight loss nutraceuticals designed for oral use, regardless of where they were manufactured. All items were assigned a code reference number to avoid duplication in samples and to allow for tracking. We recorded details for each sample, including which part of the shop the product was found in, the manufacturer’s recommended dosage, the product size/volume, the dosage form, the batch number, the barcode, the category and subcategory, the name of the product, the nation of origin/manufacture, and the brand name. If more than one outlet offered identical products for sale (same name, manufacturer, formula, size/volume, barcode), we tested the sample that was obtained first and returned the others. In the instance when two products had identical names but came from different manufacturers or were offered in different forms (e.g., one liquid and one tablet), we put both products into the testing regime. All products were sent to the laboratory to be tested the day they were collected.

4.3. Sample Treatment

Tablets and capsules were homogenized by making fine powders using a mortar, pestle, and grinder. The homogenized material was then used for sample preparation. Powers and liquids were homogenized by stirring with a spatula or glass rod. The homogenized material was then used for sample preparation. Samples in the form of herbal tea-like leaves and roots were homogenized using a blender. The homogenized material was then used for sample preparation.
Approximately 0.5 g of each food, dietary supplement, and health supplement as a homogenous sample were added into a 20 mL stoppered flask, with 400 µL of ISTD intermediate solution mix (1 ppm) and 15 mL of water:acetonitrile (20:80, v/v), sonicated to complete disintegration, cooled to room temperature, and diluted to the appropriate volume with diluent. The two phases were separated by centrifugation (6000 rpm), and then the supernatant solution was filtered through a 0.2 µm nylon syringe filter and put into an HPLC autosampler vial.

4.4. RP-HPLC-MS/MS Analysis

The reverse-phase liquid chromatography–high resolution mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry (RP-HPLC-MS/MS) analysis was performed with the Agilent 1260 infinity series 6420 Triple Quad MS system equipped with a Kinetex XB-C18 (100 Å, 50 × 2.1 mm) column. The mobile phases were A (3 mM ammonium formate + 0.1% formic acid in water) and B (0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile) at the gradient program is showed in Table 6. Chromatographic separation was achieved with gradient elution (5 μL of the sample was injected into the chromatographic system) at a flow rate of 0.25 mL/min and column temperature of 50 °C. The peaks of the determined components were identified by their mass and by comparing their retention time with that of standards, and the run time was 20 min (Table 7).

4.5. Validation Methodology

The method was fully validated according to the ICH (International Conference on Harmonization) guidelines by determination of linearity, precision, accuracy, limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ). The selectivity of the method was proven with the chromatographic peak resolution obtained between sibutramine, fluoxetine and phenolphthalein. Calibration standards of sibutramine, fluoxetine, and phenolphthalein at concentrations of 3.0, 5.0, 10.0, 25.0, 50.0, and 100.0 µg/kg and internal standards of sibutramine-d6 and fluoxetine-d5 at a concentration of 20.0 µg/kg, which were added to the blank matrix (analyte free matrix). Spiked blank samples (analyte free matrix) were extracted into a 20 mL stoppered flask and analyzed following previously described sample preparation procedures. The solutions were stored in an amber-colored glass vial at −20 °C for long-term storage. The linearity of the method was tested in the range of 3.0–100.0 µg/kg with a correlation coefficient value greater than 0.995.
The limit of detection was determined on analyte-free samples (herbal tea, energy drink and fish oil capsules) with a signal-to-noise ratio of at least 3:1. The limit of quantification (LOQ) was estimated based on a signal-to-noise ratio of at least 10. The LOD and LOQ of the method were tested in the range of 40.0–120.0 µg/kg. The limits of the method were 10.0 µg/kg and 120.0 µg/kg for the LOD and LOQ, respectively.
The repeatability test for retention time (RT) and peak area was carried out by injecting the standard mixtures of 3 analytes with ISTD at concentrations of 3.0 µg/kg, 10 µg/kg and 80 µg/kg 6 times a day. The relative standard deviation (RSD) of intraday precision for RT and peak area was 0.42% and 6.93%, respectively.
The accuracy and precision procedure was demonstrated by spiking 6 individual solutions at concentrations ranging from LOQ to medium and high levels from the calibration concentrations. In this method validation, sibutramine, fluoxetine and phenol-phthalein were spiked at 3.0 µg/kg, 10 µg/kg and 80 µg/kg in analyte-free products such as herbal tea, energy drink and fish oil capsules were prepared and analyzed for each of the six spike levels. The %RSD and % Recoveries found as mentioned in Table 8.
Moreover, the reproducibility test was performed by injecting the standard mixtures of 3 analytes with ISTD at concentrations of 3.0 µg/kg, 10 µg/kg and 80 µg/kg 6 times for 2 days in analyte-free products such as herbal tea, energy drink and fish oil capsules were prepared and analyzed for each of the six spike levels. The %RSD and % Recoveries found as mentioned in Table 9.
To the quality control and quality assurance (QC/QA), 10 mg of sibutramine, fluoxetine, and phenolphthalein were transferred in methanol into a 10 mL volumetric flask to achieve a concentration of 1000 mg/L, and serial dilutions to 20 µg/L with methanol were made. This stock solution was stored in an amber-colored glass vial at −20 °C. The quality control of standard was evaluated with 10 µg/L concentration of the standard prepared separately from the different/same LOT, and the recovery was within 90–110%. For the quality control of samples, an analyte-free matrix was spiked at a concentration of 10 µg/kg, and the recovery was within 80–120%. To study the duplicate sample preparation, unknown samples were taken in duplicate, and the variation was not more than 10%. To evaluate the spiked sample preparation, unknown samples were spiked at a concentration of 10 µg/kg, obtaining a recovery within 80–120%. To check the standards, the same standard 10 µg/kg preparation was injected at the end of the sequence, and the recovery was within 90–110%.
Sibutramine, fluoxetine, and phenolphthalein quantifications were performed using the ratio of the intensity of the two major fragment ions. The peak area ratio (PAR) for each working solution by dividing the peak area of the sibutramine and fluoxetine (AREAsibutramine and fluoxetine) by the peak area of the internal standard (AREAIS) were calculated. Calibration curves from the PAR and the concentration of the standard solutions were constructed. The concentrations of sibutramine, fluoxetine, and phenolphthalein from the unknown samples were calculated by using the following formula: Concentration (mg/kg) = Instrument Con. (µg/kg) × Make up volume (mL) × Dilution Weight of sample (g) × 1000.

4.6. Statistical Analysis

Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 26 Chicago, IL, USA. The qualitative variables were displayed using frequencies and percentages. The incidence of undeclared pharmaceutical chemicals in the weight loss supplements was defined as the proportion of the products that contained significant concentrations of either sibutramine, phenolphthalein, or fluoxetine. For each weight loss supplement containing pharmaceutical chemicals, an estimate of the daily intake dose of each pharmaceutical chemical was calculated as the test concentration of the pharmaceutical chemical (mg/kg) and the manufacturer’s daily instructions for use (g). The Chi-square and Fisher exact tests were used to explore the factors linked to adulteration behaviors. p-values < 0.05 and a 95% confidence interval were set as the criteria for statistical significance.

5. Conclusions

While weight loss herbal supplements offered for sale in the UAE have relatively low percentages of undeclared pharmaceuticals, many people take several different supplements daily and may face quite high levels of combined toxic exposure. Information regarding the dangers presented by such products should be made available to healthcare workers, including practicing physicians, pharmacists, and nutritionists. In addition, more quality and safety checks should be undertaken on these sorts of products and greater controls should be introduced in terms of regulatory regimes, additional research, more education, and better reporting of undesirable outcomes.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online, Figure S1: shows the Chromatograms for some analyzed weight loss supplements.

Author Contributions

A.A.J. and S.S.A.-H. designed and conceptualized the study. M.S. and A.A.J. responsible for sample collection. A.A.J. and S.H.Z. performed sample testing and analysis. A.A.J. and S.S.A.-H. responsible for data entry, analysis and interpretation. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

No funding was used to assist in the preparation of this study.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Approval for the study was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of An-Najah National University (ref Phd/2/20/13).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

Samples of the compounds are available on request from the corresponding author.

References

  1. Bass, I. Dietary Supplement Regulation: A Comprehensive Guide; Food and Drug Law Institute: Washington, DC, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  2. Musaiger, A.O.; Al-Hazzaa, H.M. Prevalence and risk factors associated with nutrition-related noncommunicable diseases in the Eastern Mediterranean region. Int. J. Gen. Med. 2012, 5, 199–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. United Nation Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). Counterfeit Goods: A Bargain or a Costly Mistake? Transnational Organized Crime; UNODC: Vienna, Austria, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  4. Khazan, M.; Hedayati, M.; Kobarfard, F.; Askari, S.; Azizi, F. Identification and determination of synthetic pharmaceuticals as adulterants in eight common herbal weight loss supplements. Iran. Red Crescent Med. J. 2014, 16, e15344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Rebiere, H.; Guinot, P.; Civade, C.; Bonnet, P.A.; Nicolas, A. Detection of hazardous weight-loss substances in adulterated slimming formulations using ultra-high-pressure liquid chromatography with diode-array detection. Food Addit. Contam. Part A Chem. 2012, 29, 161–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Calahan, J.; Howard, D.; Almalki, A.J.; Gupta, M.P.; Calderón, A.I. Chemical adulterants in herbal medicinal products: A review. Planta Med. 2016, 82, 505–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Jordan, S.A.; Cunningham, D.G.; Marles, R.J. Assessment of herbal medicinal products: Challenges, and opportunities to increase the knowledge base for safety assessment. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2010, 243, 198–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Haneef, J.; Shaharyar, M.; Husain, A.; Rashid, M.; Mishra, R.; Siddique, N.A.; Pal, M. Analytical methods for the detection of undeclared synthetic drugs in traditional herbal medicines as adulterants. Drug Test. Anal. 2013, 5, 607–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Moreira, A.P.; Martini, M.; De Carvalho, L.M. Capillary electrophoretic methods for the screening and determination of pharmacologic adulterants in herbal-based pharmaceutical formulations. Electrophoresis 2014, 35, 3212–3230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rocha, T.; Amaral, J.S.; Oliveira, M. Adulteration of dietary supplements by the illegal addition of synthetic drugs: A review. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2016, 15, 43–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sarker, M. Adulteration of herbal medicines and dietary supplements with undeclared synthetic drugs: Dangerous for human health. Int. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 2014, 6, 1–2. [Google Scholar]
  12. Vaclavik, L.; Krynitsky, A.J.; Rader, J.I. Mass spectrometric analysis of pharmaceutical adulterants in products labeled as botanical dietary supplements or herbal remedies: A review. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2014, 406, 6767–6790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Garg, M.; Hooda, M.; Solanki, J.; Saini, S.; Das, S. A recent update on undeclared chemicals in herbal formulations. J. Pharm. Biomed. Sci. 2011, 9, 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  14. Ernst, E. Adulteration of Chinese herbal medicines with synthetic drugs: A systematic review. J. Intern. Med. 2002, 252, 107–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Bogusz, M.J.; Hassan, H.; Al-Enazi, E.; Ibrahim, Z.; Al-Tufail, M. Application of LC-ESI-MS-MS for detection of synthetic adulterants in herbal remedies. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2006, 41, 554–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Liang, Q.; Qu, J.; Luo, G.; Wang, Y. Rapid and reliable determination of illegal adulterant in herbal medicines and dietary supplements by LC/MS/MS. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2006, 40, 305–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Zhang, X. WHO Guidelines on Safety Monitoring of Herbal Medicines in Pharmacovigilance Systems; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  18. Calapai, G. European legislation on herbal medicines: A look into the future. Drug Saf. 2008, 31, 428–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kim, J.W.; Kweon, S.J.; Park, S.K.; Kim, J.Y.; Lee, J.H.; Han, K.M.; Cho, S.; Kim, J.; Han, S.Y.; Kim, H.J.; et al. Isolation and identification of a sibutramine analogue adulterated in slimming dietary supplements. Food Addit. Contam. Part A 2013, 30, 1221–1229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Turkmenoglu, F.P.; Kutsal, Y.G.; Dolgun, A.B.; Diker, Y.; Baydar, T. Evaluation of herbal product use and possible herb-drug interactions in Turkish elderly. Complement. Ther. Clin. Pract. 2016, 23, 46–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Jalili, R.; Miraghaei, S.; Mohammadi, B.; Babaei, A.; Bahrami, G. Detection of corticosteroid compounds and phosphodiesterase inhibitors (PDH-5) as counterfeit in herbal products available in Iranian market by HPLC method. J. Rep. Pharm. Sci. 2015, 4, 75–81. [Google Scholar]
  22. Hachem, R.; Assemat, G.; Martins, N.; Balayssac, S.; Gilard, V.; Martino, R.; Malet-Martino, M. Proton NMR for detection, identification and quantification of adulterants in 160 herbal food supplements marketed for weight loss. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2016, 124, 34–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Neves, D.; Caldas, E.D. Determination of caffeine and identification of undeclared substances in dietary supplements and caffeine dietary exposure assessment. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2017, 105, 194–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wang, J.; Chen, B.; Yao, S. Analysis of six synthetic adulterants in herbal weight-reducing dietary supplements by LC electrospray ionization-MS. Food Addit. Contam. Part A 2008, 25, 822–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Consumer Products Safety Section (CPSS). Health Supplements Registration Procedures, DM-PH&SD-P5-TG2; Public Health & Safety Department: Guntur, India, 2016.
  26. Jairoun, A.A.; Shahwan, M.; Zyoud, S.H. Fish oil supplements, oxidative status, and compliance behaviour: Regulatory challenges and opportunities. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0244688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Jairoun, A.A.; Shahwan, M.; Zyoud, S.H. Heavy metal contamination of dietary supplements products available in the UAE markets and the associated risk. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 18824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Eleven Slimming Supplements Have Been Withdrawn from the Market Due to Their Danger to Health-Local-Health-UAE Today. Available online: https://www.emaratalyoum.com/local-section/health/2017-08-14-1.1019060 (accessed on 9 February 2021).
  29. Dubai Warns against 33 Health and Sexual Enhancement Supplements, Government–Gulf News. Available online: https://gulfnews.com/uae/government/dubai-warns-against-33-health-and-sexual-enhancement-supplements-1.2075256 (accessed on 22 January 2021).
  30. Skalicka-Woźniak, K.; Georgiev, M.I.; Orhan, I.E. Adulteration of herbal sexual enhancers and slimmers: The wish for better sexual well-being and perfect body can be risky. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2017, 108, 355–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Dastjerdi, A.G.; Akhgari, M.; Kamali, A.; Mousavi, Z. Principal component analysis of synthetic adulterants in herbal supplements advertised as weight loss drugs. Complement. Ther. Clin. Pract. 2018, 31, 236–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Yun, J.; Choi, J.; Jo, C.; Kwon, K. Detection of synthetic anti-obesity drugs, designer analogues and weight-loss ingredients as adulterants in slimming foods from 2015 to 2017. J. Chromatogr. Sep. Tech. 2017, 9, 2. [Google Scholar]
  33. Ching, C.K.; Chen, S.P.L.; Lee, H.H.C.; Lam, Y.H.; Ng, S.W.; Chen, M.L.; Tang, M.H.Y.; Chan, S.S.S.; Ng, C.W.Y.; Cheung, J.W.L.; et al. Adulteration of proprietary Chinese medicines and health products with undeclared drugs: Experience of a tertiary toxicology laboratory in Hong Kong. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2018, 84, 172–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Hayun, H.; Maggadani, B.P.; Amalina, N. Determination of sibutramine adulterated in herbal slimming products using TLC densitometric method. Indones. J. Pharm. 2016, 27, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. De Carvalho, L.M.; Martini, M.; Moreira, A.P.; De Lima, A.P.; Correia, D.; Falcão, T.; Garcia, S.C.; De Bairros, A.V.; Do Nascimento, P.C.; Bohrer, D. Presence of synthetic pharmaceuticals as adulterants in slimming phytotherapeutic formulations and their analytical determination. Forensic Sci. Int. 2011, 204, 6–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Venhuis, B.; Zwaagstra, M.; Van den Berg, J.; Wagenaar, H.; Van Riel, A.; Barends, D.; De Kaste, D. Trends in Drug Substances Detected in Illegal Weight-Loss Medicines and Dietary Supplements: A 2002–2007 Survey and Health Risk Analysis; RIVM Report 370030002/2009; RIVM: Bilthoven, The Netherlands, 2009.
  37. Jung, J.; Hermanns-Clausen, M.; Weinmann, W. Anorectic sibutramine detected in a Chinese herbal drug for weight loss. Forensic Sci. Int. 2006, 161, 221–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Luque, C.A.; Rey, J.A. The discovery and status of sibutramine as an anti-obesity drug. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2002, 440, 119–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zou, P.; Oh, S.S.; Kiang, K.H.; Low, M.Y.; Bloodworth, B.C. Detection of sibutramine, its two metabolites and one analogue in a herbal product for weight loss by liquid chromatography triple quadrupole mass spectrometry and time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2007, 21, 614–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wooltorton, E. Obesity drug sibutramine (Meridia): Hypertension and cardiac arrhythmias. CMAJ 2002, 166, 1307–1308. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  41. Daglioglu, N.; Akcan, R. High dosage sibutramine detected in chinese herbal drug. Nobel Med. 2012, 8, 100–102. [Google Scholar]
  42. Phattanawasin, P.; Sotanaphun, U.; Sukwattanasinit, T.; Akkarawaranthorn, J.; Kitchaiya, S. Quantitative determination of sibutramine in adulterated herbal slimming formulations by TLC-image analysis method. Forensic Sci. Int. 2012, 219, 96–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Chen, S.P.; Tang, M.H.; Ng, S.W.; Poon, W.T.; Chan, A.Y.; Mak, T.W. Psychosis associated with usage of herbal slimming products adulterated with sibutramine: A case series. Clin. Toxicol. 2010, 48, 832–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Coogan, P.F.; Rosenberg, L.; Palmer, J.R.; Strom, B.L.; Zauber, A.G.; Stolley, P.D.; Shapiro, S. Phenolphthalein laxatives and risk of cancer. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2000, 92, 1943–1944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Ahmed, N.; Nounou, M.I.; Abouelfetouh, A.; El-Kamel, A. Over-the-counter herbal weight loss supplements in Egypt: Label claim, microbiological and pharmaceutical quality, and safety assessments. Med. Princ. Pract. 2019, 28, 167–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ozdemir, B.; Sahin, I.; Kapucu, H.; Celbis, O.; Karakoc, Y.; Erdogan, S.; Onal, Y. How safe is the use of herbal weight-loss products sold over the internet? Hum. Exp. Toxicol. 2013, 32, 101–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Diet Pill Addiction and Misuse: Addiction Education. Available online: http://www.addictionsearch.com (accessed on 6 February 2021).
  48. Toubro, S.; Astrup, A.V.; Breum, L.; Quaade, F. Safety and efficacy of long-term treatment with ephedrine, caffeine and an ephedrine/caffeine mixture. Int. J. Obes. Relat. Metab. Disord. 1993, 17 (Suppl. S1), S69–S72. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  49. Maryam, A. Some aspects of the problem of adulterated herbal medicines by the illegal addition of active pharmaceutical ingredients. J. Clin. Toxicol. 2016, 6, e124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Cho, S.H.; Park, H.J.; Lee, J.H.; Kim, H.J.; Cho, S.; Yoon, C.Y.; Kim, W.S. Monitoring of 35 illegally added steroid compounds in foods and dietary supplements. Food Addit. Contam. Part A 2014, 31, 1470–1475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. De Carvalho, L.M.; Moreira, A.P.; Martini, M.; Falcão, T. The illegal use of synthetic pharmaceuticals in herbal formulations: An overview of adulteration practices and analytical investigations. Forensic Sci. Rev. 2011, 23, 73–89. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  52. Cebi, N.; Yilmaz, M.T.; Sagdic, O. A rapid ATR-FTIR spectroscopic method for detection of sibutramine adulteration in tea and coffee based on hierarchical cluster and principal component analyses. Food Chem. 2017, 229, 517–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. ElAgouri, G.; ElAmrawy, F.; ElYazbi, A.; Eshra, A.; Nounou, M.I. Male enhancement nutraceuticals in the middle east market: Claim, pharmaceutical quality and safety assessments. Int. J. Pharm. 2015, 492, 109–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Stratio, Inc. Broadband, Handheld and Affordable Spectrometer (Linksquare) for Fast and Reliable Drug Identification; Stratio, Inc.: California, CA, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  55. World Health Organization. WHO Traditional Medicine Strategy: 2014–2023. Available online: http://www.who.int/medicines/publications/traditional/trm_strategy14_23/en/ (accessed on 1 October 2021).
  56. Dwyer, J.T.; Coates, P.M.; Smith, M.J. Dietary supplements: Regulatory challenges and research resources. Nutrients 2018, 10, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Molecules 26 06903 g001 550
Figure 1. Chemical structure of fluoxetine, phenolphthalein, and sibutramine.
Figure 1. Chemical structure of fluoxetine, phenolphthalein, and sibutramine.
Molecules 26 06903 g001
Table
Table 1. Number and percentages of sample baseline characteristics (n = 137).
Table 1. Number and percentages of sample baseline characteristics (n = 137).
CharacteristicsGroupsFrequencyPercentage
Dosage formCapsule8763.5%
Tablet3122.6%
Tea bags1913.9%
Country of originCanada32.2%
USA6748.9%
European Union2216.1%
China75.1%
Malaysia64.4%
India42.9%
UAE42.9%
Undeclared2417.5%
Table
Table 2. Distribution of weight loss supplements that contained the tested prescription drugs and chemicals below the limit of detection (n = 137).
Table 2. Distribution of weight loss supplements that contained the tested prescription drugs and chemicals below the limit of detection (n = 137).
Prescription Drug/ChemicalNumber of Products with Prescription Drug/Chemical under the LOD
FrequencyPercentage
sibutramine11684.7%
phenolphthalein11886.1%
fluoxetine13094.95
Abbreviation: LOD, limit of detection = 10 μg/kg.
Table
Table 3. Estimation of hidden prescription drugs and chemicals in weight loss supplements.
Table 3. Estimation of hidden prescription drugs and chemicals in weight loss supplements.
Prescription Drug/ChemicalThe Proportion of Weight Loss Supplements That Contained
Hidden Prescription Drugs/Chemicals
N%95% CI
LowerUpper
sibutramine2115.3%9.221.4
phenolphthalein1913.9%8.0119.7
fluoxetine75.1%1.48.8
Abbreviation: 95% CI: confidence interval, N: number of sample.
Table
Table 4. List of tested weight loss supplement products according to the prescription drugs/chemicals and sample characteristics.
Table 4. List of tested weight loss supplement products according to the prescription drugs/chemicals and sample characteristics.
Sample CharacteristicsEstimated Concentration (mg/kg)Daily Dose (mg/day)Number of Hidden Chemicals
Sample CodeDosage FormCountry of OriginSibutraminePhenolphthaleinFluoxetineSibutramine Daily DosePhenolphthalein Daily DoseFluoxetine Daily DoseN
1TabletUndeclared259NDND5.18NDND1
2TabletChina258.8NDND0.11NDND1
3CapsuleUSA29.06117.07ND0.020.07ND2
4CapsuleUndeclaredND199.5193.97ND0.070.062
5CapsuleUndeclared172183.48ND0.320.34ND2
6CapsuleUndeclared214.86173.05ND0.110.09ND2
7CapsuleMalaysia101.36146.7914.420.090.130.013
8CapsuleChina213.49235.02ND111.01122.21ND2
9CapsuleUSAND163.1NDND0.91ND1
10CapsuleMalaysiaND193.75NDND0.08ND1
11CapsuleEU44.75202.92120.170.7846.083
12CapsuleChina98.95163.55ND0.050.09ND2
13CapsuleUndeclared16.88NDND0.01NDND1
14Tea bagsUndeclared10.63NDND0.15NDND1
15TabletUndeclared0.141.9ND00ND2
16CapsuleUndeclared16,823.313,218.83411.779.258.243
17CapsuleUndeclared121.7NDND0.12NDND1
18CapsuleUndeclared99.5345ND382.081324.8ND2
19CapsuleUndeclared130189ND72.02104.71ND2
20TabletUndeclared7821317249.76135.89109.743
21TabletUndeclared123245ND170.77340.16ND2
22TabletUndeclared1237234ND1355.75256.46ND2
23TabletUndeclared16,823.31235711,776.3186.139.93
24TabletUndeclared23228945226.9282.6444.013
Notes: The daily dose was calculated by using the test concentration of each chemical (mg/kg) and the manufacturer’s advised daily adult dose (g). ND, not detected.
Table
Table 5. Comparison of hidden prescription drugs and chemicals according to sample characteristics.
Table 5. Comparison of hidden prescription drugs and chemicals according to sample characteristics.
CharacteristicGroupHidden Prescription Drugs and Chemicals
N%p-Value
Dosage formCapsule1517.2%0.178
Tablet825.8%
Tea bags15.3%
Country of originDeclared87.1%<0.001
Undeclared1666.7%
p-values reported above are for comparisons between variable level “category-levels” using the Chi-square and Fisher exact tests. p-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Table
Table 6. Gradient program and MS conditions: Source parameters.
Table 6. Gradient program and MS conditions: Source parameters.
Gradient ProgramMS Conditions-Source Parameters
Time% Mobile Phase A% Mobile Phase BIon Source: ESI
Scan Type: MRM
Div valve: To MS
Delta EMV(+): 300
Gas Temp: 350 °C
N2 Gas flow: 10 L/min
Nebulizer: 50 psi
Capillary Voltage: 4000 V (Positive and Negative)
Chromatogram: TIC
0.065.035.0
1.065.035.0
7.010.090.0
7.510.090.0
8.065.035.0
16.065.035.0
MS: mass spectrometry.
Table
Table 7. Acquisition parameters.
Table 7. Acquisition parameters.
Compound NamePrecursor IonMS1 ResProduct IonMS2 ResDwellFVCECAVPolarity
phenolphthalein319.3Wide224.9 *Unit200139167Positive
Wide141Unit200139407Positive
sibutramine280.9Wide139Unit2009687Positive
Wide125 *Unit20096287Positive
fluoxetine310.1Wide117Unit20096507Positive
Wide148 *Unit20096107Positive
sibutramine-d6286.9Wide125Unit200101287Positive
fluoxetine-d5316.2Wide154.1Unit2007027Positive
* Product ions were used for quantitation, MS: mass spectrometry, Dwell: Dwell time, FV: fragmentor voltage, CE: collisional energy, CAV: cell accelerator voltage.
Table
Table 8. Accuracy and Precision on day 1.
Table 8. Accuracy and Precision on day 1.
Matrix Name% RSD of RTSpike at 3.0 µg/kgSpike at 10 µg/kgSpike at 80 µg/kg
% RSD% Recovery% RSD% Recovery% RSD% Recovery
Herbal Tea0.47.383.66.187.95.393.5
Energy Drink0.95.486.74.591.43.294.9
Fish oil capsules1.58.883.97.688.55.090.6
RSD: relative standard deviation, RT: retention time.
Table
Table 9. Accuracy and Precision on day 2 (Reproducibility).
Table 9. Accuracy and Precision on day 2 (Reproducibility).
Matrix Name% RSD of RTSpike at 3.0 µg/kgSpike at 10 µg/kgSpike at 80 µg/kg
% RSD% Recovery% RSD% Recovery% RSD% Recovery
Herbal Tea0.388.682.57.288.34.892.1
Energy Drink0.85.585.14.290.94.093.3
Fish oil capsules1.37.682.76.086.45.392.6
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jairoun, A.A.; Al-Hemyari, S.S.; Shahwan, M.; Zyoud, S.H. Adulteration of Weight Loss Supplements by the Illegal Addition of Synthetic Pharmaceuticals. Molecules 2021, 26, 6903. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26226903

AMA Style

Jairoun AA, Al-Hemyari SS, Shahwan M, Zyoud SH. Adulteration of Weight Loss Supplements by the Illegal Addition of Synthetic Pharmaceuticals. Molecules. 2021; 26(22):6903. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26226903

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jairoun, Ammar A., Sabaa Saleh Al-Hemyari, Moyad Shahwan, and Sa’ed H. Zyoud. 2021. "Adulteration of Weight Loss Supplements by the Illegal Addition of Synthetic Pharmaceuticals" Molecules 26, no. 22: 6903. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26226903

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop