Next Article in Journal
Diaryl Sulfide Derivatives as Potential Iron Corrosion Inhibitors: A Computational Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Assessment of the In Vivo and In Vitro Release of Chemical Compounds from Vespa velutina
Previous Article in Journal
d-Allulose Ameliorates Skeletal Muscle Insulin Resistance in High-Fat Diet-Fed Rats
Previous Article in Special Issue
Identification and Evaluation of Aromatic Volatile Compounds in 26 Cultivars and 8 Hybrids of Freesia hybrida
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Volatilome and Essential Oil of Ulomoides dermestoides: A Broad-Spectrum Medical Insect

by
Paulina J. Cázares-Samaniego
1,
Claudia G. Castillo
1,*,
Miguel A. Ramos-López
2 and
Marco M. González-Chávez
3,*
1
Coordinación para la Innovación de la Ciencia y la Tecnología (CIACYT), Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, Sierra Leona #550, Col. Lomas de San Luis, San Luis Potosí C.P. 78210, Mexico
2
Facultad de Química, Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro, Cerro de las Campanas s/n, Col. Las Campanas, Santiago de Querétaro, Querétaro C.P. 76010, Mexico
3
Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Centro de Investigación y Estudios de Posgrado, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, Dr. Manuel Nava Martínez #6, Zona Universitaria, San Luis Potosí C.P. 78210, Mexico
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2021, 26(20), 6311; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26206311
Submission received: 21 September 2021 / Revised: 8 October 2021 / Accepted: 15 October 2021 / Published: 19 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Progress in Volatile Organic Compounds Research II)

Abstract

:
Ulomoides dermestoides are used as a broad-spectrum medical insect in the alternative treatment of various diseases. Preliminary volatilome studies carried out to date have shown, as the main components, methyl-1,4-benzoquinone, ethyl-1,4-benzoquinone, 1-tridecene, 1-pentadecene, and limonene. This work focused on the production of metabolites and their metabolic variations in U. dermestoides under stress conditions to provide additional valuable information to help better understand the broad-spectrum medical uses. To this end, VOCs were characterized by HS-SPME with PEG and CAR/PDMS fibers, and the first reported insect essential oils were obtained. In HS-SMPE, we found 17 terpenes, six quinones, five alkenes, and four aromatic compounds; in the essential oils, 53 terpenes, 54 carboxylic acids and derivatives, three alkynes, 12 alkenes (1-Pentadecene, EOT1: 77.6% and EOT2: 57.9%), 28 alkanes, nine alkyl disulfides, three aromatic compounds, 19 alcohols, three quinones, and 12 aldehydes were identified. Between both study approaches, a total of 171 secondary metabolites were identified with no previous report for U. dermestoides. A considerable number of the identified metabolites showed previous studies of the activity of pharmacological interest. Therefore, considering the wide variety of activities reported for these metabolites, this work allows a broader vision of the therapeutic potential of U. dermestoides in traditional medicine.

1. Introduction

The tenebrionid Ulomoides dermestoides (Fairmaire, 1983) (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) (synonyms: Alphitobius; Dermestoides; Martianus dermestoides; Palembus dermestoides) is a darkling beetle endemic to the Indomalaya and Papua regions [1]. It is used as a broad-spectrum medical insect in the alternative treatment of various diseases, such as bronchial asthma, dermatitis, rheumatoid arthritis, hemorrhoids, inflammation and pain in the liver and kidneys, Parkinson’s disease, diabetes mellitus, HIV, and different types of cancer [2,3,4,5]. Studies carried out to date have been preliminary, detecting methyl-1,4-benzoquinone (MBQ), ethyl-1,4-benzoquinone (EBQ), 1-pentadecene, and limonene as the significant volatile organic components (VOCs) that are expelled by the insect in its defense secretions [6,7]. To date, just a few investigations have evaluated the pharmacological activity of organic extracts derived from U. dermestoides. Among the biological activities evaluated in these investigations are anti-inflammatory [3], cytotoxic [4], antiproliferative [8], antidiabetic [5], antioxidant and antimicrobial activity [9] without attributing the biological activity found to a specific metabolite. The metabolites reported for U. dermestoides do not explain the wide spectrum of the medicinal use of the insect; therefore, a more extensive study of the metabolomics of the insect and its variation due to stimuli is required to explain the wide spectrum of entopharmacological use.
Currently, secondary metabolites of insects are obtained using various methodologies, of which we can highlight organic extraction [10,11], solid-phase extraction (SPE) [12,13], and headspace-solid phase microextraction (HS-SPME) [14,15], in conjunction with gas chromatography (GC) coupled to a flame ionization detector (FID) and/or mass spectrometry (MS) for the identification of metabolites. For U. dermestoides, only the VOCs have been evaluated by HS-SPME, with the polydimethylsiloxane/divinylbenzene (PDMS/DVB) fiber [6]. However, it has several limitations due to its inability to capture nonpolar and highly polar compounds; therefore, this fiber does not cover a broad spectrum of compounds. For this reason, it remains to be determined whether U. dermestoides can produce other chemically diverse secondary metabolites.
Moreover, like other organisms such as plants and bacteria, U. dermestoides would be expected to modify its metabolism if the conditions change, such as when the insect has been ingested. In this sense, the production of U. dermestoides metabolites and their metabolic variations under stress conditions would provide additional valuable information to help better understand the broad spectrum of its medical uses. In this work, the number of fibers with different polarities used in HS-SPME was increased to determine a higher number of the compounds present in the volatilome of U. dermestoides and the metabolic changes that occurred when the insect was subjected to a stimulus that emulated their consumption. The results led to the procurement of the first essential oils from insects, and their characterization allows us to understand that the metabolomics of the insect is more complex than previously reported, thus justifying the wide spectrum of medicinal uses attributed to U. dermestoides.

2. Results

2.1. VOCs Collection with CAR/PDMS Fiber

To determine greater amounts of VOCs of U. dermestoides, the volatilome profiles were analyzed by GC-MS under two stimulus conditions over time with CAR/PDMS and PEG fibers.The compounds identified in treatment 1 (T1) in the initial 5 min showed EBQ as the major component (39.21%), followed by limonene (21.82%), and then MBQ, p-benzoquinone (BQ), α-pinene, and 1-pentadecene with 14.29%, 6.11%, 4.35%, and 4.33%, respectively, of the total. However, over time, the relative percentages of these compounds changed—the relative amounts of EBQ and MBQ gradually decreased to as low as 7.44% and 1.94%, respectively, at 18 h, while the relative amounts of limonene, α-pinene, and 1-pentadecene more than doubled during the same period (Table 1, representative chromatograms: Figures S1 and S3, see Supplementary Materials).
Adding treatment 2 (T2) to the insects had a notable effect on the metabolite profile starting in the first minutes of exposure (Table 1). Here, at 5 min of incubation, 1-pentadecene was the major compound present, comprising 53.74% of the total, followed by limonene (29.22%), and α-pinene, 1-tridecene, EBQ, and carene, with 8.95%, 2.63%, 1.9%, and 1.15% of the total, respectively. Over time, the relative amount of 1-pentadecene decreased to as low as 22.44% of the total at 18 h of incubation. The concentrations of the rest of these VOCs tended to increase over time, with limonene making up 47.7% of the total and α-pinene, 1-tridecene, EBQ, and carene making up, respectively, 11.85%, 7.1%, 6.71%, and 3.9% of the total at 18 h of exposure. An increase in the type of VOCs released was in fact observed at 1 h of incubation with T2. This increase was particularly important for sesquiterpene compounds.
Most importantly, when the two tested stimuli were compared, the beetles that were subjected to T1 immediately released quinone derivatives and limonene, and their metabolism increased the amounts of 1-pentadecene and terpenes when in the presence of the simulated gastric fluid. These differences were also observed at different incubation points, e.g., at 18 h, when higher concentrations of terpenes such as limonene and pinene were observed for insects subjected to T1.

2.2. VOCs Collection with PEG Fiber

As shown in Table 2 (representative chromatograms: Figures S2 and S4), when the extraction was performed with PEG fiber on beetles under T1, the most prevalent polar compounds identified at the initial time point were quinones. Here, EBQ was the most abundant quinone, making up 54.25% of the total VOCs, followed by MBQ, EHQ, HQ, BQ, and MHQ, which made up, respectively, 17%, 7.45%, 3.54%, 3.08%, and 1.49%; in addition to quinones, 1-pentadecene and limonene were observed in somewhat significant amounts, making up 5.64% and 1%, respectively, of the total. From the initial time point up to 24 h of assessment, the concentrations of the quinones EBQ, EHQ, and MHQ increased to 58.25%, 12.49%, and 2.96% of the total, respectively, while the levels of 1-pentadecene, HQ, BQ, and limonene compounds decreased. Likewise, at 6 h and 18 h, other monoterpenes such as cis-verbenol, verbenone, myrtenol, and perillol were observed, as well as two phenol-type compounds, namely m-cresol and 3,4-dimethylphenol.
Moreover, when the extraction was performed with PEG fibers for beetles under T2, 1-pentadecene (67.62%) was initially the main compound observed, followed by EBQ (11.02%), limonene (10.21%), 1-tridecene (1.94%), MBQ (1.16%), and MHQ (0.464%). As the incubation time was increased, these percentages changed considerably; for example, at 24 h, the concentrations of 1-pentadecene and 1-tridecene decreased considerably and those of the quinone-derived compounds increased two- to three-fold from the initial values. Unlike the results in T1, when the sample was treated with T2, neither cis-verbenol, verbenone, and myrtenol monoterpenes nor phenol-like metabolites were detected.
In general terms, U. dermestoides under the four analysis conditions produced the same types of molecules: quinones, terpenes, and aliphatic alkenes. Moreover, as reported previously, methyl-1,4-benzoquinone, ethyl-1,4-benzoquinone, limonene, 1-tridecene, and 1-pentadecene were present under all four conditions. On the other hand, other secondary metabolites were identified that had not been previously reported for U. dermestoides. These results suggested the need to obtain essential oils under both stimulus conditions to obtain a broader vision of the metabolome of U. dermestoides.

2.3. Obtention and Characterization of Essential Oils

During sample processing by hydrodistillation, characteristic behaviors of each essential oil were observed, namely the striking color of the distillation water for EOT1 and the absence of this in EOT2. On the other hand, oil drops were visible only in EOT2. The yield of the essential oils EOT1 and EOT2 was 0.19% and 0.9%, respectively. For EOT1, 61 compounds were identified, which corresponds to 93.70%; meanwhile, 87 compounds, which represented 92.98% of the total were identified in EOT2.
In both oils, the major component was 1-pentadecene, comprising 77.6% and 57.9% of the total in EOT1 and EOT2, respectively, followed by 1-tridecene (3%), limonene (2.9%), pentacosane (1.8), and tricosane (1.5%), in EOT1, while hentriacontane (6.53%), palmitic acid (6.47%), linoleic acid (2.79%), tricosane (2.79%), pentacosane (2.2%), 1-tridecene (1.75%), oleic acid (1.72%) and limonene (1.43%) were the most abundant compounds in EOT2 (Table 3, Figures S5 and S6).
In the essential oils, 11 terpenes, 12 carboxylic acids and their derivatives, 17 alkanes, eight alkenes, nine alkyl disulfides, and three aromatic compounds were identified for the first time in this report. Among the metabolites exclusively found in EOT1, were the terpenes β-thujene and phytan, as well as the alkanes heneicosane and 1-cyclohexyleicosane. On the other hand, squalene, n-hexyl salicylate, ethyl myristate, pentadecanoic acid, linoleic acid, γ-palmitolactone, ethyl stearate, 5-ethyldecane, 6-methylundecano, 3-ethyltetracosane, triacontane, pentacosane, benzothiazole, 6-tert-butyl-3-methylanisole, methyl n-butyl disulfide, ethyl n-butyl disulfide, propyl n-butyl disulfide, butyl n-heptyl disulfide, and pentyl n-heptyl disulfide were found exclusively in EOT2.
Due to the presence of carboxylic acids, alcohols, and aldehydes in essential oils, it was necessary to confirm these results by derivatization. For this analysis, 38 and 77 compounds were identified, which corresponds to an increase of 3.75% and 6.38% in their identification in EOT1 and EOT2, respectively. Therefore, new compounds—25 terpenes, 33 carboxylic acids, and 18 alcohols—were identified with derivatization by silanization (Table 4).
In this analysis, the metabolites found only in EOT1 were 15-isobutyl-(13α-H)-isocopalane, 2-octanoic acid, suberic acid, benzenepropanoic acid, and 2,4-dimethyl-3-pentanol. In the case of EOT2, terpenes as myrtenoic acid, 18-norabieta-8,11,13-triene, 10,18-bisnorabieta-8,11,13-triene, allopregnane, pimaric acid, 7-ethyl-1,4a,7-trimethyl-3,4,4b,5,6,8,10,10a-octahydro-2H-phenanthrene-1-carboxylic acid, isopimaric acid, 8-pimarenic acid, abiet-8-en-18-oic acid, 12α-hydroxy-5α-pregnane, coprostane, cholesterol, germanicol, 3-epimoretenol, campesterol, and avenasterol were found; carboxylic acid and derivatives: butanoic acid, valeric acid, peracetic, 10-undecenoic acid, tridecanoic acid, 2-resorcylic acid, 9-tetradecenoic acid, 9-hexadecenoic acid, cis-10-heptadecenoic acid, cis-11,14-eicosadienoic acid, cis-11-eicosenoic acid, arachidic acid, 1-monopalmitin, docosanoic acid, triacontadienoic acid and dotriacontadienoic acid; and alcohols: 2,2-dimethyl-3-pentanol, furfuryl alcohol, 2,3-butanediol, 4-hydroxybenzenemethanol, 2-pentadecanol, 1-heptadecanol, oleyl alcohol, 1-hexacosanol, 1-octacosanol and 1-dotriacontanol.
In the derivatization for the detection of aldehydes and alkynes, a total of 12 aldehydes and three alkynes were identified. These corresponded to an increase in the total percentage of identified compounds of 0.01% and 0.56% for EOT1 and EOT2, respectively. In summary, the total percentages of identified compounds for EOT1 and EOT2 were 97.46% and 99.92%. The compounds exclusively found in EOT2 were eight of the 12 aldehydes and the three alkynes (Table 5).
In general, the compounds obtained from both oils can be classified into 10 categories: alcohols, aldehydes, alkanes, alkenes, alkynes, alkyl disulfides, aromatic compounds, carboxylic acids, and their derivatives, quinones and terpenes. The amount and type of these metabolites varied depending on the stimulus to which the sample was subjected when the essential oil was obtained. Despite a significant decrease in alkenes and terpenes with respect to the peak area, the variety of these metabolites in EOT2 increased. For the remaining metabolite groups, all compounds increased both in the peak area and in the variety of compounds present (Figure 1).
One of the categories of greatest biological interest is terpenes; therefore, they were analyzed independently. In EOT2, the number of functionalized terpenes increased, and there was a tendency for the peak area to increase with respect to EOT1. Although in terpenes that were not functionalized, the areas of the peaks were smaller, the variety of terpenes present was greater in EOT2 than in EOT1 (Figure 2).

3. Discussion

Our results show that the four experimental conditions for the volatilome present three main compound groups: quinones, alkenes, and terpenes. The most abundant compounds are methyl-1,4-benzoquinone, ethyl-1,4-benzoquinone, limonene, 1-pentadecene, and 1-tridecene, in agreement with previous reports [6,7]. However, we found 15 terpenes, four quinones, two alkenes, and four aromatic compounds that had not been previously identified in this organism. The HS-SPME results show the presence of a complex mixture of metabolites of different chemical nature, and the changes over time may be a reflection of the metabolic variety and/or an effect of the equilibrium absorption-desorption process of the compounds in the fiber.
For essential oils, there are five groups of major compounds, these being alkenes (1-pentadecene), carboxylic acids (palmitic, myristic, oleic, and linoleic acids), alkanes (pentacosane and hentriacontane), terpenes (limonene, dehydroabietic acid, β-sitosterol), and alcohols (2-heptanol). 1-Pentadecene is the main component in both essential oils, contrary to the previous report in HS-SPME, where EBQ and MBQ are reported as the main components [6]. This alkene is reported for some coleopters, and it is hypothesized as an epideictic pheromone and defensive secretion [16]. However, other compounds were identified in both analyses, including 50 other terpenes, 37 carboxylic acids, and their derivates, 16 alkanes, nine alkenes, three alkynes, 18 alcohols, 12 aldehydes, nine alkyl disulfides, four quinones, and six aromatic compounds. Note that some terpenes, hydroquinones, and carboxylic acids have been previously reported for other coleopters [17,18,19] but never before, until the current work, for U. dermestoides.
Regarding the relative percentage of the identified VOCs, the results obtained in this study suggested a considerably lower rate of release of quinone derivatives by U. dermestoides in the presence of the PBET solution than in its absence, and this trend was independent of the type of fiber used for the analysis. However, when analyzing the concentrations of these metabolites in the essential oil, it was observed that their concentration was considerably lower than expected with respect to HS-SPME. This finding indicates that HS-SPME results tend to depend on the balance in the absorption-desorption process, which does not guarantee that the metabolites best captured by the fibers are the most abundant in the sample. In addition, as in other studies [20,21,22], the components identified by hydrodistillation are greater than those obtained by HS-SPME. Therefore, despite the shorter analysis time and the preservation of the sample, HS-SPME remains a limited tool for the characterization of a large number of the compounds present in a complex sample.
However, the fact that quinones are present at low concentrations in essential oils is encouraging, since the importance of these metabolites lies in their potential toxicity. The toxicity of quinones to cells is based on a series of mechanisms that include oxidative stress, redox cycles, arylation, intercalation, induction of cuts in DNA chains, generation of free radicals, and interference with mitochondrial respiration [23,24,25].
In insects, terpenes play essential roles as sex pheromones, trail pheromones, and aggregation and alarm pheromones, as well as in the defense against pathogens [26,27]. It has been postulated that insects can synthesize them de novo, generally as monoterpenes, and they also have the ability to sequester terpenes produced by host plants or endosymbiotic microorganisms [26,27,28]. Monoterpenes are presumably assembled from isopentenyl diphosphate (IDP) and dimethylallyl diphosphate (DMADP) derived from the mevalonate route. In this metabolic pathway, the trans- or cis- isoprenyl diphosphate synthases (IDSs) catalyze the condensation of IDP with one or two isomers of DMADP [26,27,28,29,30]. Trans-IDS enzymes have the particularity of being able to catalyze the syntheses of both precursors and final metabolites, and they can also produce monoterpenes and sesquiterpenes, depending on the cofactor to which they are exposed [29,30,31]. This protein is expressed to a greater extent in insect fat bodies, so this tissue may be the location of the syntheses of terpenes or their precursors [28,32]. Wherever terpenes and/or their precursors are synthesized, they are transported by the hemolymph to reservoir glands, where they are released as part of a defense mechanism [28,29].
Our results suggest that the increase in the size of terpenes produced by U. dermestoides could be explained by the release of cofactors that regulate the activity of IDSs via stimulation of simulated gastric juice. The acidic environment produced by this stimulus could improve the bioavailability of metal ions to the beetle and thereby modify the ability of these proteins to regulate activity. Likewise, it has been reported that IDS proteins can remain active over wide ranges of pH (pH 4–8) and temperature (15–45 °C) [29], so they could be active even after the incubation of the beetle with the PBET solution. Although this could tell us how the insect produces terpenes of greater molecular weight, there are no reports in the literature detailing the mechanisms by which an insect modifies the functionalization of the terpenes it produces. This process has been well documented in plants [33]; however, many of the processes and enzymes involved in the metabolomics of insects are still unknown. Likewise, the fact that terpenic acids—which are produced by conifers as well as some species from Asteraceae, Celstraceae, Hydrocharitaceae, and Lamiaceae, even some cyanobacterial and fungal species [34,35]—have been detected lays the foundation for rethinking whether the insect not only assimilates these metabolites from food [36,37] but would also be capable of producing them.
As with terpenes, alkanes and alkenes in insects are produced in specialized cells called oenocytes, which are found mainly in the abdomen—associated with epidermal cells or, in some cases, with body fat cells [38,39]. Hydrocarbons are subsequently transported by the hemolymph to both external and internal tissues, including the epicuticle, fat body, ovaries, and reservoir glands [39,40,41]. Cuticle hydrocarbons in insects have two main functions: to protect the insect against desiccation and as signaling molecules in a wide variety of chemical communication systems [42,43].
In our results, a considerable increase in long-chain fatty acids (myristic acid, palmitic acid, stearic acid), saturated aldehydes, and methyl-branched and saturated alcohols were observed in EOT2 compared to EOT1. This could be explained by a modification of the metabolic pathways of cuticle hydrocarbon production by the stress conditions to which the insects were subjected in EOT2 to attempt to protect the insect from the hostile environment to which it was subjected. Therefore, we observe how these precursors (long-chain fatty acids, aldehydes, and alcohols)—as well as the final product of the metabolic route n-alkanes and methyl-branched alkanes—increase. Considering that alkenes have a lower melting point as well as a lower impermeability profile that could affect survival [44], the insect modifies its metabolic routes to enhance the production of alkanes. The absence of the precursors of n-alkenes, unsaturated alcohols, and aldehydes would explain why EOT2 does not increase the number of alkenes identified in the essential oil.
As with the previous metabolites, the increase in the concentration of alkyl disulfides may be a response to the exposure of insects to PBET. However, it is not yet clear how these metabolites are produced or what function they have in the insect.
Many of the metabolites found in U. dermestoides have a prior history of clinically important biological activity, among which we can highlight azelaic acid, furfuryl alcohol, benzaldehyde, and phenylacetaldehyde. These compounds possess numerous biological activities of clinical interest, such as anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, antioxidant, antifungal, and anticancer properties [45,46,47,48]. However, the group of compounds with the greatest diversity of biological activities of interest are terpenes such as limonene, fucosterol, and dehydroabietic acid. These terpenes present antioxidant, anticancer, antiulcer, antihistaminic, antiadipogenic, antiphotodamaging, antimicrobial, antitumor, gastroprotective, hepatoprotective, antiviral, antihyperalgesic, anti-inflammatory, anticholinergic, anti-osteoporotic, antidiabetic, and antihyperlipidemic activities [49,50,51].

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Chemicals

The reagents used in this study were sodium citrate, lactic acid, pepsin, N,O-bis(trimethylsilyl)trifluoroacetamide (BSTFA), trimethylsilyl chloride (TMCS), boron trifluoride methanol solution (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA), DL-malic acid, acetic acid and ethylic ether (JT Baker, Deventer, Holland).

4.2. Insects

Ulomoides dermestoides were originally obtained from a local provider. The taxonomical identity of U. dermestoides was obtained according to the keys published by Kim and Jung (2005) [52], in the Insecticidal Natural Compounds Laboratory of the Faculty of Chemistry, Autonomous University of Querétaro, México. A two-year-old colony was maintained at 27 ± 2 °C and 70 ± 5% relative humidity on a sterile oatmeal substrate and fed with whole bread supplemented with banana peels.

4.3. Sample Preparation

Five adult insects were gently placed in a 17 mL glass vial sealed with a Teflon cover with a rubber septum. The samples were incubated and evaluated at five different time points (5 min, 1 h, 6 h, 18 h, and 24 h) in order to monitor changes in the profile of the volatilome of the insect. In addition, the insects were subjected to two treatments, and each condition was tested in duplicate:
  • Treatment 1 (T1): manually shaking the vial for 5 min at room temperature to stimulate the release of defense secretion.
  • Treatment 2 (T2): 1.5 mL of the PBET solution was added to the vial with the insects and incubated at 37 °C with constant agitation (130 rpm). The PBET solution consisted of 0.5 mg/mL sodium citrate, 0.5 mg/mL malic acid, 0.5 µL/mL acetic acid, 0.4 µL/mL lactic acid and ~800 U/mL pepsin at pH 3. The PBET solution simulates the leaching of a solid matrix in the human gastrointestinal tract in order to determine the bioaccessibility of a particular element, such as the total fraction available for adsorption during transit through the small intestine [53]. This digestion simulant solution allowed emulation of the conditions of the insects being ingested and digested by gastric fluid.

4.4. VOCs Collection by HS-SPME

The HS-SPME technique was performed using a 75-µm film thickness carboxen/polydimethylsiloxane (CAR/PDMS) and 60-µm film thickness carbowax (PEG) fibers (Supelco, Bellefonte, PA, USA) to detect compounds from nonpolar to polar. To sample the VOCs secreted by U. dermestoides, the fibers were placed at a constant distance of 3.4 cm from the insects in treatment 1 and 2.6 cm from the insects in treatment 2. VOCs were absorbed for 15 min, and a desorption time of the fibers of 15 s was used. Fibers were previously conditioned for 5 min at 250 °C at the injection port and reconditioned before each analysis.

4.5. Volatilome GS-MS Analysis

GC-MS analysis was performed using a 6890N Network GC System coupled to a 5973 Network mass selective detector (MSD) (Agilent Technologies, Wilmington, DE, USA). The separation was performed using an HP-5MS capillary column (0.25 mm i.d. × 30 m, 0.25 µm film thickness) (J&W, Folsom, CA, USA). The injector was operated in the splitless mode at 250 °C, and the oven temperature was programmed to be 40 °C for 3 min, and then heated at 15 °C/min to 250 °C with a holding time of 5 min at the final temperature. The MSD was operated at 70 eV, the ion source was set at 150 °C, and the transfer line was at 250 °C. VOCs were identified by interpreting their mass spectra fragmentation in the mass range of 50–400 atomic mass units. The software MSD ChemStation (Agilent B.04.02) was used for data recording. The compounds were identified by comparing the obtained mass spectra with those of reference compounds from the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST11) and Wiley 9th. The identities of the compounds were confirmed by the Kovats retention index calculated for each peak with reference to the n-alkane standards (C7–C18) running under the same conditions.

4.6. Obtention of Essential oil of U. dermestoides (EOT1)

An amount of 306 g of adult U. dermestoides was hydrodistilled at the boiling temperature of the water. The VOCs were extracted from the stripping water by means of liquid-liquid extraction with ethyl ether. The organic phase was concentrated at 20 °C under reduced pressure until the solvent was eliminated, and the residual water was removed with sodium sulfate.

4.7. Obtention of Essential oil of U. dermestoides Post PBET Digestion (EOT2)

An amount of 383 g of adult U. dermestoides was digested for 12 h in PBET solution with subsequent inactivation of the solution to pH 7 with sodium bicarbonate. The VOCs were extracted from the stripping water by means of liquid-liquid extraction with ethyl ether. The organic phase was concentrated at 20 °C under reduced pressure until the solvent was eliminated and the residual water was removed with sodium sulfate.

4.8. Derivatization for Alcohols and Carboxylic Acid Detection

Essential oils were diluted to 2% in 500 µL heptane and introduced into a 10 mL vial. Then, 100 µL of BSTFA/TMCS solution (9:1 v/v) was added to the same vial as a silanizing agent. The mixture was reacted at 80 °C under microwave irradiation (200 W microwave power) for 10 min using the Discover System 908,005 (CEM Corporation, NC, USA).

4.9. Derivatization for Aldehydes and Alkyne Detection

Essential oils were diluted to 2% in 500 µL heptane and introduced into a 10 mL vial. Then, 100 µL of boron trifluoride 14% in methanol solution was added to the same vial. The mixture was reacted at 80 °C under microwave irradiation (200 W microwave power) for 10 min using the Discover System 908005.

4.10. Essential Oil GS-MS Analysis

Samples without derivatization were diluted to 2% in heptanol, using 1 µL of each sample for the analysis, and each sample was analyzed in triplicate. GC-MS analysis was performed using a 7890A Network GC System coupled to a 5975C Network mass selective detector (MSD) and 7683B autosampler (Agilent Technologies, Wilmington, DE, USA). The separation was performed using an HP-5MS capillary column (0.25 mm i.d. × 30 m, 0.25 µm film thickness) (J&W, Folsom, CA, USA). The injector was operated in splitless mode at 300 °C, with a flow of 0.8 mL/min, and the oven temperature was programmed to 40 °C for 3 min, and then heated at 3 °C/min to 300 °C with a holding time of 5 min at the final temperature. The MSD was operated at 70 eV; the ion source was set at 150 °C and the transfer line at 300 °C. VOCs were identified by interpreting their mass spectra fragmentation in the mass range of 15 to 800 atomic mass units. The software MSD ChemStation (Agilent) was used for data recording. The compounds were identified by comparing the obtained mass spectra with those of reference compounds from the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST11) and Wiley 9th. The identities of the compounds were confirmed by the Kovats retention index calculated for each peak with reference to the n-alkane standards (C7–C38) running under the same conditions.

4.11. Statistical Analysis

The relative percentage of each metabolite was calculated considering the peak area obtained by GC-MS of each metabolite in relation to the total area of peaks analyzed. Data represent the mean of the relative percentage of three repeats ± SD. Metabolites grouped for type for each essential oil were compared with the Mann Whitney U test considering the peak area of each metabolite and a p ≤ 0.05. The data in the graphics were expressed as median and range of each group. GraphPad Prism 5 was used to perform the analysis.

5. Conclusions

In the volatilome analysis, the use of fibers of different polarities was necessary to expand the detection of metabolites in U. dermestoides. Under these analytical conditions, we found 15 terpenes, four quinones, two alkenes, and four aromatic compounds that had not been previously identified in this organism. The composition of essential oils consisted of 10 groups of compounds: alcohols, aldehydes, alkanes, alkenes, alkynes, alkyl disulfides, aromatic compounds, carboxylic acids, and their derivatives, quinones, and terpenes. There were 146 metabolites not previously reported for U. dermestoides, in addition to those identified by HS-SPME, of which 76 were found in EOT1 and 132 in EOT2. Between both studies approaches a total of 203 compounds were identified, of which 171 metabolites are reported for the first time in this work for U. dermestoides.
In addition, the exposure of U. dermestoides to PBET solution in both study approaches showed modifications in the expression of secondary metabolites, principally, an increase in the number of alkanes, alkynes, aromatic compounds, alcohols, alkyl disulfides, carboxylic acids, and terpenoids.
This work reports essential oils obtained from insects for the first time, and also, lays the foundations for the bio-directed study of entopharmacological activity and metabolic pathways of U. dermestoides essential oils and their metabolites.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online. Figures S1–S6 show representative chromatograms of the volatilome and essential oils of U. dermestoides.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.G.C. and M.M.G.-C.; methodology, P.J.C.-S., C.G.C., M.A.R.-L. and M.M.G.-C.; formal analysis, P.J.C.-S. and M.M.G.-C.; investigation, P.J.C.-S., C.G.C. and M.M.G.-C.; writing—original draft preparation, P.J.C.-S.; writing—review and editing, P.J.C.-S., C.G.C., M.A.R.-L. and M.M.G.-C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The representatives chromatograms obtained in this study are available in the Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

We thank to CONACYT for a graduate fellowship (590396) for Paulina J. Cázares-Samaniego. We also thanks to Adriana E. Rodríguez Pérez for the revision of the manuscript and María G. Ortega Salazar for the technical assistance.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

Samples of the essential oils are not available from the authors.

References

  1. Flores, G.E.; Padín, S.B.; Stetson, R.E. First records of the Oriental species Ulomoides dermestoides (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) in Argentina. Rev. Soc. Entomol. Argent. 2002, 61, 48–50. [Google Scholar]
  2. Deloya-Brito, G.G.; Deloya, C. Sustancias Producidas Por El Coleóptero Ulomoides Dermestoides (Chevrolat, 1878) (Insecta: Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae): Efecto Anti-Inflamatorio Y Citotóxico. Acta Zoológica Mex. 2014, 30, 655–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Vianna-Santos, R.C.; Lunardelli, A.; Caberlon, E.; Maria, C.; Bastos, A.; Nunes, F.B.; Guerra, M.; Pires, S.; Biolchi, V.; Paul, E.L.; et al. Anti-inflammatory and Immunomodulatory Effects of Ulomoides dermestoides on Induced Pleurisy in Rats and Lymphoproliferation In Vitro. Inflammation 2010, 33, 173–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Crespo, R.; Villaverde, M.L.; Girotti, J.R.; Güerci, A.; Juárez, M.P.; De Bravo, M.G. Cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of defence secretion of Ulomoides dermestoides on A549 cells. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2011, 136, 204–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Jasso-Villagomez, E.; Garcia-Lorezana, M.; Almanza-Perez, J.C.; Fortis-Barrera, M.A.; Blancas-Flores, G.; Roman-Ramos, R.; Prado-Barragan, L.A.; Alarcon-Aguilar, F.J. Beetle (Ulomoides dermestoides) fat improves diabetes: Effect on liver and pancreatic architecture and on PPARg expression. Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res. 2018, 51, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Villaverde, M.L.; Girotti, J.R.; Mijailovsky, S.J.; Pedrini, N.; Juárez, M.P. Volatile secretions and epicuticular hydrocarbons of the beetle Ulomoides dermestoides. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part B 2009, 154, 381–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Pedrini, N.; Ortiz-Urquiza, A.; Huarte-Bonnet, C.; Fan, Y.; Juárez, M.P.; Keyhani, N.O. Tenebrionid secretions and a fungal benzoquinone oxidoreductase form competing components of an arms race between a host and pathogen. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 651–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Dávila-vega, J.P.; Duarte-martínez, H.E.; López-aguirre, C.A.; Pérez-arteaga, E.; Zagal-salinas, A.A.; Karla, G.E.; Martínez-elizalde, S. Efecto antiproliferativo del extracto metanólico de Ulomoides dermestoides Chevrolat (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) en linfocitos humanos. Entomol. Mex. 2017, 4, 560–565. [Google Scholar]
  9. Flores, D.R.; Casados, L.E.; Velasco, S.F.; Ramírez, A.C.; Velázquez, G. Comparative study of composition, antioxidant and antimicrobial activity of two adult edible insects from Tenebrionidae family. BMC Chem. 2020, 14, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kartika, T.; Shimizu, N.; Yoshimura, T. Identification of esters as novel aggregation pheromone components produced by the male powder-post beetle, Lyctus africanus lesne (Coleoptera: Lyctinae). PLoS ONE 2015, 10, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Uzakah, R.P.; Odebiyi, J.A.; Chaudhury, M.F.B.; Hassanali, A. Evidence for the presence of a female produced sex pheromone in the banana weevil Cosmopolites sordidus Germar (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Sci. Res. Essays 2015, 10, 471–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Silva, W.D.; Millar, J.G.; Hanks, L.M.; Bento, J.M.S. (6E,8Z)-6,8-Pentadecadienal, a Novel Attractant Pheromone Produced by Males of the Cerambycid Beetles Chlorida festiva and Chlorida costata. J. Chem. Ecol. 2016, 42, 1082–1085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Lyons-Yerion, C.D.; Barbour, J.D.; Mongold-Diers, J.A.; Williams, C.J.; Cook, S.P. Identification of a male-produced volatile pheromone for Phymatodes dimidiatus (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) and seasonal flight phenology of four phymatodes species endemic to the north american intermountain west. Environ. Entomol. 2020, 49, 1077–1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Yasui, H.; Fujiwara-Tsujii, N.; Yasuda, T. Detection of volatile pheromone candidates from the white-spotted longicorn beetle, Anoplophora malasiaca (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Appl. Entomol. Zool. 2019, 54, 203–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Pizzolante, G.; Cordero, C.; Tredici, S.M.; Vergara, D.; Pontieri, P.; Del Giudice, L.; Capuzzo, A.; Rubiolo, P.; Kanchiswamy, C.N.; Zebelo, S.A.; et al. Cultivable gut bacteria provide a pathway for adaptation of Chrysolina herbacea to Mentha aquatica volatiles. BMC Plant Biol. 2017, 17, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Đukić, N.; Andrić, G.; Glinwood, R.; Ninkovic, V.; Andjelković, B.; Radonjić, A. The effect of 1-pentadecene on Tribolium castaneum behaviour: Repellent or attractant? Pest Manag. Sci. 2021, 77, 4034–4039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lečić, S.; Ćurčić, S.; Vujisić, L.; Ćurčić, B.; Ćurčić, N.; Nikolić, Z.; Anđelković, B.; Milosavljević, S.; Tešević, V.; Makarov, S. Defensive Secretions in Three Ground-Beetle Species (Insecta: Coleoptera: Carabidae). Ann. Zool. Fennici 2014, 51, 285–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hassemer, M.J.; Sant’Ana, J.; De Oliveira, M.W.M.; Borges, M.; Laumann, R.A.; Caumo, M.; Blassioli-Moraes, M.C. Chemical Composition of Alphitobius diaperinus (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) Abdominal Glands and the Influence of 1,4-Benzoquinones on Its Behavior. J. Econ. Entomol. 2015, 108, 2107–2116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Brown, W.V.; Doyen, J.T.; Moore, B.P.; Lawrence, J.F. Chemical composition and taxonomic significance of defensive secretions of some australian Tenebrionidae (Coleoptera). Aust. J. Entomol. 1992, 31, 79–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mohebat, R.; Bidoki, M.Z. Comparative chemical analysis of volatile compunds of Echinops ilicifolius using hydrodestillation and headspce solid-phase microextraction and the actibacterial acivities of its essential oils. R. Soc. Open Sci. 2018, 5, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Paniandy, J.C.; Chane-Ming, J.; Pieribattesti, J.C. Chemical composition of the essential oil and headspace solid-phase microextraction of the guava fruit (psidium guajava l.). J. Essent. Oil Res. 2000, 12, 153–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Skalicka-Wozniak, K.; Los, R.; Glowniak, K.; Malm, A. Comparison of hydrodistillation and headspace solid-phase microextraction techniques for antibacterial volatile compounds from the fruits of Seseli libanotis. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2010, 5, 1427–1430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Monks, T.; Jones, D. The Metabolism and Toxicity of Quinones, Quinonimines, Quinone Methides, and Quinone-Thioethers. Curr. Drug Metab. 2005, 3, 425–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Bolton, J.L.; Dunlap, T. Formation and Biological Targets of Quinones: Cytotoxic versus Cytoprotective Effects. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2016, 30, 13–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Das, A.; Chakrabarty, S.; Choudhury, D.; Chakrabarti, G. 1,4-benzoquinone (PBQ) induced toxicity in lung epithelial cells is mediated by the disruption of the microtubule network and activation of caspase-3. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2010, 23, 1054–1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Beran, F.; Köllner, T.G.; Gershenzon, J.; Tholl, D. Chemical convergence between plants and insects: Biosynthetic origins and functions of common secondary metabolites. New Phytol. 2019, 223, 52–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Burse, A.; Boland, W. Deciphering the route to cyclic monoterpenes in Chrysomelina leaf beetles: Source of new biocatalysts for industrial application? Z. Naturforsch.—Sect. C J. Biosci. 2017, 72, 417–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Burse, A.; Schmidt, A.; Frick, S.; Kuhn, J.; Gershenzon, J.; Boland, W. Iridoid biosynthesis in Chrysomelina larvae: Fat body produces early terpenoid precursors. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2007, 37, 255–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Frick, S.; Nagel, R.; Schmidt, A.; Bodemann, R.R.; Rahfeld, P.; Pauls, G.; Brandt, W.; Gershenzon, J.; Boland, W.; Burse, A. Metal ions control product specificity of isoprenyl diphosphate synthases in the insect terpenoid pathway. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 4194–4199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Lancaster, J.; Khrimian, A.; Young, S.; Lehner, B.; Luck, K.; Wallingford, A.; Ghosh, S.K.B.; Zerbe, P.; Muchlinski, A.; Marek, P.E.; et al. De novo formation of an aggregation pheromone precursor by an isoprenyl diphosphate synthase-related terpene synthase in the harlequin bug. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, E8634–E8641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Gilg, A.B.; Tittiger, C.; Blomquist, G.J. Unique animal prenyltransferase with monoterpene synthase activity. Naturwissenschaften 2009, 96, 731–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Jiang, M.; Lü, S.; Zhang, Y. The Potential Organ Involved in Cantharidin Biosynthesis in Epicauta chinensis Laporte (Coleoptera: Meloidae). J. Insect Sci. 2017, 17, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Banerjee, A.; Hamberger, B. P450s controlling metabolic bifurcations in plant terpene specialized metabolism. Phytochem. Rev. 2018, 17, 81–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Eksi, G.; Kurbanoglu, S.; Erdem, S.A. Analysis of diterpenes and diterpenoids. In Recent Advances in Natural Products Analysis; Elsevier Inc.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 313–345. ISBN 9780128164556. [Google Scholar]
  35. Costa, M.S.; Rego, A.; Ramos, V.; Afonso, T.B.; Freitas, S.; Preto, M.; Lopes, V.; Vasconcelos, V.; Magalhães, C.; Leaõ, P.N. The conifer biomarkers dehydroabietic and abietic acids are widespread in Cyanobacteria. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Itoh, H.; Tago, K.; Hayatsu, M.; Kikuchi, Y. Detoxifying symbiosis: Microbe-mediated detoxification of phytotoxins and pesticides in insects. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2018, 35, 434–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Brooks, S.N.; Pettinger, W.A. Defensive use by an insect of a plant resin. Science 1973, 184, 996–999. [Google Scholar]
  38. Blomquist, G.J.; VOgt, R.G. Insect Pheromone Biochemistry and Molecular Biology: The Biosynthesis and Detection of Pheromones and Plant Volatiles; Elsevier: London, UK, 2003; pp. 205–235. [Google Scholar]
  39. Blomquist, G.J.; Tittiger, C.; Jurenka, R. Cuticular Hydrocarbons and Pheromones of Arthropods. In Hydrocarbons, Oils and Lipids: Diversity, Origin, Chemistry and Fate; Springer International Publishing: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2018; pp. 1–32. [Google Scholar]
  40. Jurenka, R.A.; Subchev, M. Identification of cuticular hydrocarbons and the alkene precursor to the pheromone in hemolymph of the female gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar. Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 2000, 43, 108–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Provost, E.; Blight, O.; Tirard, A.; Renucci, M. Hydrocarbons and insects’ social physiology. In Social Insects: Structure, Function, and Behavior; Nova Science Publishers: Hauppauge, NY, USA, 2011; pp. 19–69. ISBN 9781617614668. [Google Scholar]
  42. Holze, H.; Schrader, L.; Buellesbach, J. Advances in deciphering the genetic basis of insect cuticular hydrocarbon biosynthesis and variation. Heredity 2021, 126, 219–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Qiu, Y.; Tittiger, C.; Wicker-Thomas, C.; Le Goff, G.; Young, S.; Wajnberg, E.; Fricaux, T.; Taquet, N.; Blomquist, G.J.; Feyereisen, R. An insect-specific P450 oxidative decarbonylase for cuticular hydrocarbon biosynthesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 14858–14863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Chung, H.; Carroll, S.B. Wax, sex and the origin of species: Dual roles of insect cuticular hydrocarbons in adaptation and mating. BIoEssays 2015, 37, 822–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Kumar, A.; Rao, R.; Yadav, P. Azelaic Acid: A Promising Agent for Dermatological Applications. Curr. Drug Ther. 2019, 15, 181–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Chai, W.M.; Liu, X.; Hu, Y.H.; Feng, H.L.; Jia, Y.L.; Guo, Y.J.; Zhou, H.T.; Chen, Q.X. Antityrosinase and antimicrobial activities of furfuryl alcohol, furfural and furoic acid. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2013, 57, 151–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Ullah, I.; Khan, A.L.; Ali, L.; Khan, A.R.; Waqas, M.; Hussain, J.; Lee, I.J.; Shin, J.H. Benzaldehyde as an insecticidal, antimicrobial, and antioxidant compound produced by Photorhabdus temperata M1021. J. Microbiol. 2015, 53, 127–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Kurashov, E.A.; Fedorova, E.V.; Krylova, J.V.; Mitrukova, G.G. Assessment of the potential biological activity of low molecular weight metabolites of freshwater macrophytes with QSAR. Scientifica 2016, 2016, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Abdul, Q.A.; Choi, R.J.; Jung, H.A.; Choi, J.S. Health benefit of fucosterol from marine algae: A review. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2016, 96, 1856–1866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. González, M.A. Aromatic abietane diterpenoids: Their biological activity and synthesis. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2015, 32, 684–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Vieira, A.J.; Beserra, F.P.; Souza, M.C.; Totti, B.M.; Rozza, A.L. Limonene: Aroma of innovation in health and disease. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2018, 283, 97–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. KIM, J.I.; JUNG, B.H. Contribution to the Tribes Diaperini doyen in Korea (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae: Diaperinae). Entomol. Res. 2005, 35, 95–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Ruby, M.V.; Davis, A.; Schoof, R.; Eberle, S.; Sellstone, C.M. Estimation of lead and arsenic bioavailability using a physiologically based extraction test. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1996, 30, 422–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Grouped essential oil compounds. The data are presented as the median of the peak area of each compound (grouped by type) and the range of the data. * Significant difference (p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 1. Grouped essential oil compounds. The data are presented as the median of the peak area of each compound (grouped by type) and the range of the data. * Significant difference (p ≤ 0.05).
Molecules 26 06311 g001
Figure 2. Analysis of the amount and type of terpenes. (a) The data are presented as the median of the peak area of each terpene (grouped by type) and the range of the data. M: monoterpene, Mo: monoterpenoids, S: sesquiterpene, D: diterpene, Do: diterpenoids, St: sesterterpenes, Sto: sesterterpenoids, T: triterpene, To: Triterpenoids. * Significant difference (p ≤ 0.05). (b) Number of terpene compounds in each essential oil.
Figure 2. Analysis of the amount and type of terpenes. (a) The data are presented as the median of the peak area of each terpene (grouped by type) and the range of the data. M: monoterpene, Mo: monoterpenoids, S: sesquiterpene, D: diterpene, Do: diterpenoids, St: sesterterpenes, Sto: sesterterpenoids, T: triterpene, To: Triterpenoids. * Significant difference (p ≤ 0.05). (b) Number of terpene compounds in each essential oil.
Molecules 26 06311 g002
Table 1. VOCs produced by U. dermestoides and collected with CAR/PDMS fiber.
Table 1. VOCs produced by U. dermestoides and collected with CAR/PDMS fiber.
No.CompoundsKIRelative Abundance (%)
RefExp5 min1 h6 h18 h24 h
T1T2T1T2T1T2T1T2T1T2
Quinones
1p-Benzoquinone9129206.11 2.9 0.83
2Methyl-1,4-benzoquinone1015101614.30.0713.60.953.590.681.941.4212.10.97
3Ethyl-1,4-benzoquinone1215111239.21.933.34.899.92.657.446.7134.12.56
4Hydroquinone124112910.67 0.11 0.16
52-Methylhydroquinone137813590.4 0.370.110.13 0.65
62-Ethylhydroquinone141314401.16 1.080.250.46 0.18 2.02
Terpenes
1α-Pinene9229364.358.957.972.3522.26.8931.611.96.729.09
2Camphene9589520.13 0.18 0.43 0.75 0.06
3Carene100810011.271.151.61.243.912.793.583.91.882.94
4α-Phellandrene100710060.26 0.330.630.620.430.660.590.310.94
5o-Cymene102510290.910.670.970.481.80.951.530.920.631.18
6Limonene1020103321.829.228.43344.447.836.947.729.942.8
7γ-Terpinene105310630.08 0.050.130.170.120.150.160.060.2
8p-Cymenene108110950.64 0.550.530.710.330.660.70.320.75
9Di-epi-α-cedrene-(I)138814140.15 0.050.690.080.290.1 0.1
10α-Guaiene14571456 0.11
11cis-(-)-2,4a,5,6,9a-Hexahydro-3,5,5,9-tetramethyl(1H)benzocycloheptene14781486 0.3
12Cuparene153915400.09 0.021.040.030.19 0.070.37
Alkenes
11-Tridecene128712951.132.631.177.11.33.241.342.061.024.51
21,13-Tetradecadiene13931384 0.11
31-Tetradecene13881391 0.64
41,14-Pentadecadiene148014790.46 0.191.120.10.450.040.240.42
51-Pentadecene148614944.3353.74.6340.79.0631.71222.46.2831.5
Aromatic compounds
12,2′-Bifuran133413350.250.650.39 0.44 0.4 0.09
2Nonylbenzene15541584 0.18
RT: Retention time, KI: Kovats index, T1: Agitated only insects, T2: digested with PBET solution insects.
Table 2. VOCs produced by U. dermestoides and collected with PEG fiber.
Table 2. VOCs produced by U. dermestoides and collected with PEG fiber.
No.CompoundsKIRelative Abundance (%)
RefExp5 min1 h6 h18 h24 h
T1T2T1T2T1T2T1T2T1T2
Quinones
1p-Benzoquinone9129203.080.110.62 1.29
2Methyl-1,4-benzoquinone10151016171.1615.71.4610.81.097.421.6917.12.61
3Ethyl-1,4-benzoquinone1215111254.31154.714.74916.949.822.458.526.9
4Hydroquinone124112913.540.130.94 0.21 0.43 2.34
52-Methylhydroquinone137813591.490.462.760.612.281.22.552.032.961.47
62-Ethylhydroquinone141314407.454.8912.17.7415.812.321.622.412.516.4
Terpenes
1α-Pinene922936 0.54 0.50.29 0.66
3Carene10081001 0.19 0.150.07 0.17
6Limonene10201033110.21.1810.52.9810.20.649.260.5413.6
13cis-Verbenol11481158 0.32 0.19 0.08
14p-Cymen-8-ol117211960.11 0.3 0.16 0.17
15Verbenone12041204 0.02
16Myrtenol12131212 0.35 0.28
17Perillol12971318 0.1
9Di-epi-α-cedrene-(I)14141414 0.06
12Cuparene15021540 0.660.030.40.13 0.04
Aromatic compounds
3m-Cresol10531088 0.25 2.6
43,4-Dimethylphenol11671180 0.2 2.11
12,2′-Bifuran133413350.09
Alkenes
11-Tridecene12871295 1.940.51.370.45 0.31 0.47
41,14-Pentadecadiene148014793.061.040.590.591.14 0.88 0.74
51-Pentadecene148614945.6467.610.26214.558.310.542.22.1638.2
Table 3. Identified compounds of U. dermestoides essential oils.
Table 3. Identified compounds of U. dermestoides essential oils.
No.CompoundsEOUd1EOUd2KI Ref
RA (%)KI ExpRA (%)KI Exp
Terpenes4.31% 2.13%
1α-Pinene0.239 ± 0.007903.60.106 ± 0.002903.6922
18β-thujene0.015 ± 0.000958.1 968
19Isolimonene0.008 ± 0.000967.60.005 ± 0.001967.6974
32-Carene0.074 ± 0.002995.70.037 ± 0.001995.7996
4α-Phellandrene 0.002 ± 0.0011000.2997
20α-Terpinene0.037 ± 0.00110130.084 ± 0.0021012.91008
5o-Cymene0.029 ± 0.0011021.30.024 ± 0.0011021.11025.4
6D-Limonene2.898 ± 0.0751026.71.435 ± 0.0161025.41033
8p-Cymenene0.006 ± 0.0011085.10.004 ± 0.0011086.21081
21Terpinen-4-ol0.002 ± 0.0011174.90.006 ± 0.0001174.41161
14p-Cymen-8-ol0.002 ± 0.0011185.10.018 ± 0.0011183.41172
9Di-epi-α-cedrene-(I)0.213 ± 0.0071383.10.111 ± 0.0011382.71388.2
22β-Cedrene0.012 ± 0.0011418.20.005 ± 0.00214181423
23cis-Thujopsene0.005 ± 0.0001429.30.002 ± 0.0011428.51435
12Cuparene0.004 ± 0.0021518.70.075 ± 0.0021510.91502
24Phytan0.026 ± 0.0021807.9 1811
25Squalene 0.045 ± 0.0022826.82847
2628-Nor-17β(H)-hopane0.395 ± 0.0223044.90.038 ± 0.0053033.9
2722R-17alpha(h),21beta(H)-bishomohopane0.097 ± 0.0073313.6
28γ-Sitosterol0.248 ± 0.0283331.90.128 ± 0.0203333.73351.3
Alkanes6.01% 14.74%
14-Propylheptane0.002 ± 0.000920.20.046 ± 0.002920.2945
24-Ethyloctane0.004 ± 0.002934.40.114 ± 0.003934.4954
34-Methylnonane0.012 ± 0.001943.10.185 ± 0.003943.1963.8
45-Methyldecane0.022 ± 0.0131056.80.181 ± 0.0101055.21057.4
5Undecane0.003 ± 0.0011098.70.017 ± 0.00110981100
65-Ethyldecane 0.024 ± 0.0001142.61146
76-Methylundecane 0.028 ± 0.0011152.81157
8Dodecane0.004 ± 0.0011198.90.009 ± 0.0011198.21200
9Hexadecane0.020 ± 0.0021599.40.015 ± 0.0021598.31600
10Heptadecane0.097 ± 0.00917010.038 ± 0.0021700.31700
11Octadecane0.062 ± 0.0051798.30.012 ± 0.0011797.81800
12Eicosane0.241 ± 0.0112001.20.166 ± 0.0032002.42000
13Heneicosane0.169 ± 0.0112103.5 2100
14Docosane0.161 ± 0.0102202.20.066 ± 0.0122199.52200
15Tricosane1.551 ± 0.0662306.52.789 ± 0.0172302.92300
16Tetracosane0.545 ± 0.0352405.20.230 ± 0.0072399.12400
17Pentacosane1.833 ± 0.0842511.12.270 ± 0.0202503.52500
181-Hexadecyloctahydro-1H-indene0.802 ± 0.0682553.2
193-Ethyltetracosane 0.015 ± 0.0022572.82567
20Hexacosane 0.081 ± 0.00825992600
21Heptacosane0.324 ± 0.0052709.60.406 ± 0.00327002700
221-cyclohexyleicosane0.123 ± 0.0092704.2
23Octacosane 0.042 ± 0.0012797.52800
24Nonacosane 0.642±0.0062899.72900
25Triacontane 0.084±0.0132996.93000
26Hentriacontane0.032±0.0043104.96.537±0.0153107.53100
27Dotriacontane 0.107±0.0063198.43200
28Tritriacontane 0.638±0.0053300.33300
Alkenes82.78% 61.51%
6Decene0.003±0.0009850.005±0.001985987
7Dodecene0.006±0.0011190.80.011 ± 0.0001190.11187
11-Tridecene3.020 ± 0.12612951.755 ± 0.0061293.41287
31-Tetradecene0.434 ± 0.0191392.20.231 ± 0.0021391.61385
41,14-Pentadecadiene0.456 ± 0.0561479.20.714 ± 0.0071477.41480
51-Pentadecene77.671 ± 0.906151757.965 ± 0.2401507.11486
81-Hexadecene0.278 ± 0.0171592.60.183 ± 0.0061591.31587
9(Z,Z)-1,8,11-Heptadecatriene0.083 ± 0.0071663.30.054 ± 0.0021662.61664.6
10Heptadecadiene0.318 ± 0.0201670.80.196 ± 0.0021670.11671
11Heptadecene0.513 ± 0.0301694.40.354 ± 0.0211693.51687
12Pentacosene 0.037 ± 0.0012473.22488
Alkyl disulphides0.02% 1.16%
1Methyl n-butyl disulfide 0.004 ± 0.0011027.81016
2Ethyl n-butyl disulfide 0.006 ± 0.0011110.91120
3Propyl n-butyl disulfide 0.004 ± 0.0011202.21207
4Methyl n-heptyl disulfide0.007 ± 0.00212690.206 ± 0.0011268.6
5Ethyl n-heptyl disulfide0.003 ± 0.0011360.40.028 ± 0.0031359.5
6Propyl n-heptyl disulfide0.002 ± 0.0011425.60.057 ± 0.0021424.7
7Butyl n-heptyl disulfide 0.057 ± 0.0011524.4
8Pentyl n-heptyl disulfide 0.019 ± 0.0021552.2
9Diheptyl disulfide0.007 ± 0.0011738.50.776 ± 0.0031738.2
Aldehydes0.001% 0.18%
1Phenylacetaldehyde0.001 ± 0.00010410.105 ± 0.0041040.61048
2Hexadecanal 0.079 ± 0.0051815.71820
Alcohols
11-Heptanol0.003 ± 0.00110900.007 ± 0.0011089.41092
Quinones0.00% 0.11%
3Ethyl-1,4-benzoquinone 0.083 ± 0.0021102.6
62-Ethylhydroquinone 0.026 ± 0.0031437.91427
Carboxylic acids and derivatives0.58% 13.12%
12,4-Dimethyl-5-hexanolide0.002 ± 0.0001181.60.020 ± 0.0011180.1
2Dodecanoic acid 0.012 ± 0.0011567.21556
3n-Hexyl salicylate 0.004 ± 0.0011677.41684
4Myristic acid 0.263 ± 0.0191767.91765
5Ethyl myristate 0.021 ± 0.0021794.21780
6Methyl palmitate0.021 ± 0.00119290.033 ± 0.0011928.51927
7Pentadecanoic acid 0.065 ± 0.0141945.81942
8Palmitic acid0.219 ± 0.0311967.66.475 ± 0.1601982.21964
9Ethyl palmitate0.022 ± 0.0021996.50.212 ± 0.0021996.21982
10Linolenic acid 0.029 ± 0.0022058.62102
11γ-Palmitolactone 0.086 ± 0.0052104.42106
12Linoleic acid 2.795 ± 0.1422148.22140
13Oleic Acid 1.724 ± 0.02621542140
14Ethyl-9,12-octadecadienoate0.066 ± 0.0082165.90.345 ± 0.0192164.2
15Ethyl oleate0.015 ± 0.0012170.90.364 ± 0.0692170.92149
16Stearic acid0.077 ± 0.00421750.511 ± 0.0132173.52179
17Ethyl stearate 0.039 ± 0.0082196.32180
18Stearyl acetate0.156 ± 0.0172213.20.119 ± 0.0022211.32211
Aromatic compounds 0.00% 0.04%
5Benzothiazole 0.014 ± 0.0031220.91221
66-tert-Butyl-3-Methylanisole 0.026 ± 0.0011235.7
Table 4. Identified compounds of U. dermestoides essential oils derivatized by silanization.
Table 4. Identified compounds of U. dermestoides essential oils derivatized by silanization.
No.CompoundsEOUd1EOUd2KI Ref
RA (%)KI ExpRA (%)KI Exp
Carboxylic acids and derivatives0.60% 2.71%
19Butanoic acid 0.04 ± 0.005871.5891
20Valeric acid 0.010 ± 0.000982.4975
21Peracetic acid 0.030 ± 0.0071006
22Lactic acid0.058 ± 0.0011070.30.056 ± 0.0011072.51057
23Caproic acid0.009 ± 0.00110760.032 ± 0.0021078.11071
242-Ethylhexanoic acid0.002 ± 0.00111680.011 ± 0.0011168.7
25Heptanoic acid0.006 ± 0.0001184.90.047 ± 0.0021185.91166
26Benzoic acid0.089 ± 0.00112470.028 ± 0.0011247.41232
272-Octanoic acid0.001 ± 0.0061322.5 1313.2
28Succinic acid0.007 ± 0.0011325.60.213 ± 0.0271325.61314
29Propionylglycine0.006 ± 0.0011333.9 1341
30Nonanoic acid0.019 ± 0.0041366.20.038 ± 0.0021366.21358
31Decanoic acid0.03 ± 0.0061468.10.049 ± 0.00314671455
32m-Hydroxybenzoic acid0.009 ± 0.00115280.553 ± 0.0071526.41559
3310-Undecenoic acid 0.006 ± 0.0011545.21542.2
34Pimelic acid0.003 ± 0.0011614.20.001 ± 0.0001614.91608
35Suberic acid0.012 ± 0.0041710.3 1689
36Tridecanoic acid 0.008 ± 0.0011755.31748
37Azelaic acid0.061 ± 0.0191806.90.041 ± 0.0221807.71787
38β-Resorcylic acid 0.005 ± 0.0021833.91822
399-Tetradecenoic acid 0.018 ± 0.0031841.4
40Tetradecanoic acid0.231 ± 0.0041854.11.138 ± 0.0251856.21845
41Sebacic acid0.005 ± 0.00619070.002 ± 0.0001907.51920
42Pentadecanoic acid0.004 ± 0.0011925.10.015 ± 0.0011924.81942
4313-methyltetradec-9-enoic acid 0.010 ± 0.0011946.9
449-Hexadecenoic acid 0.002 ± 0.0011974.51977
45cis-9-Hexadecenoic acid0.005 ± 0.0012024.90.100 ± 0.0032023.72017
46cis-10-Heptadecenoic acid 0.002 ± 0.0012127.52126.2
47Margaric acid0.041 ± 0.0062152.60.085 ± 0.00221522140
48cis-11,14-Eicosadienoic acid 0.036 ± 0.0012414.82413.2
49cis-11-Eicosenoic acid 0.014 ± 0.0012420.22419.7
50Arachidic acid 0.039 ± 0.00224472437
511-Monopalmitin 0.007 ± 0.0012608.92606
52Docosanoic acid 0.016 ± 0.00226452638
53Triacontadienoic acid 0.033 ± 0.0053433.1
54Dotriacontadienoic acid 0.025 ± 0.0053639.9
Alcohols0.18% 1.15%
22,2-Dimethyl-3-pentanol 0.025 ± 0.001993.8
3Furfuryl alcohol 0.102 ± 0.0171003.8
42,4-Dimethyl-3-pentanol0.011 ± 0.0001009.8 975.3
53-heptanol0.016 ± 0.0011018.70.095 ± 0.0101018.7
62-heptanol0.034 ± 0.0141025.20.394 ± 0.0181024.81008.9
72,3-Butanediol 0.282 ± 0.00610441040
11-Heptanol0.004 ± 0.0011088.40.019 ± 0.00210901092
83-Ethylphenol0.001 ± 0.0011223.10.025 ± 0.0021223.11220
94-hydroxybenzenemethanol 0.003 ± 0.0011520.31500
101-Dodecanol0.046 ± 0.0041574.50.070 ± 0.0031574.31575
111-Tetradecanol0.039 ± 0.0021768.50.035 ± 0.0021768.71768
121-Pentadecanol 0.008 ± 0.0001868.11866
132-Pentadecanol 0.001 ± 0.0011879.4
141-Hexadecanol0.028 ± 0.0031966.40.022 ± 0.0021966.61965
151-Heptadecanol 0.013 ± 0.0002069.52856
16Oleyl alcohol 0.017 ± 0.0032136.32126
171-Hexacosanol 0.007 ± 0.00129492950
181-Octacosanol 0.016 ± 0.00431493148
191-Dotriacontanol 0.019 ± 0.0043532.93529.9
Quinones0.01% 0.05%
4Hydroquinone0.008 ± 0.0011409.70.049 ± 0.0021408.41400
Terpenes2.97% 2.46%
29Myrtenoic acid 0.014 ± 0.0001535.4
3018-Norabieta-8,11,13-triene 0.004 ± 0.0011978.2
3110,18-Bisnorabieta-8,11,13-triene 0.014 ± 0.0022040.9
32Allopregnane 0.009 ± 0.0032204.82175
33Levopimaric acid0.012 ± 0.0012262.70.015 ± 0.0032264.6
34Pimaric acid 0.020 ± 0.0042281.72287
357-Ethyl-1,4a,7-trimethyl-3,4,4b,5,6,8,10,10a-octahydro-2H-phenanthrene-1-carboxylic acid 0.015 ± 0.0042293.3
3615-Isobutyl-(13α-H)-isocopalane0.110 ± 0.0012294.2
37Isopimaric acid 0.010 ± 0.0022337.12329
388-Pimarenic acid 0.102 ± 0.0042353.8
39Abiet-8-en-18-oic acid 0.179 ± 0.0032371.8
40Dehydroabietic acid0.451 ± 0.01123940.831 ± 0.0102391.72385
4112α-Hydroxy-5α-pregnane 0.007 ± 0.0032756
42Coprostane 0.010 ± 0.0022835.62822
4317.alfa.,21β-28,30-Bisnorhopane0.177 ± 0.0102873.40.005 ± 0.0002858.8
44Gammacerane0.674 ± 0.0313135.10.019 ± 0.0043122.8
45Cholesterol 0.053 ± 0.0023151.53143
46Germanicol 0.012 ± 0.0013208.6
473-Epimoretenol 0.182 ± 0.0143244.3
48Campesterol 0.010 ± 0.00132593220
49Stigmasterol0.196 ± 0.0143296.40.090 ± 0.00332913274.3
50β-Sitosterol0.991 ± 0.0143355.20.606 ± 0.0083349.83348
51Fucosterol0.286 ± 0.0043370.80.197 ± 0.0073366.3
52Aven asterol 0.015 ± 0.0013421.7
5324-Methylenecycloartenol0.07 ± 0.0093463.60.042 ± 0.0043459.43460
Aromatic compounds0.001% 0.01%
72,4-Dihydroxyacetophenone0.001 ± 0.0011726.10.007 ± 0.0011726.41709.3
Table 5. Identified compounds of U. dermestoides essential oils derivatized by acetal and enol-ether reaction.
Table 5. Identified compounds of U. dermestoides essential oils derivatized by acetal and enol-ether reaction.
CompoundsEOUd1EOUd2KI Ref
RA (%)KI ExpRA (%)KI Exp
Aldehydes0.01% 0.49%
2Hexanal0.001 ± 0.001971.80.013 ± 0.000968.5964
3Heptanal0.003 ± 0.0001077.20.015 ± 0.0011077.21069
4Benzaldehyde 0.021 ± 0.0011107.61200
1Phenylacetaldehyde 0.161 ± 0.0011217.21194
5Nonanal0.001±0.0011278.50.041 ± 0.0011278.91267
6Decanal 0.014 ± 0.0021377.41366
7Dodecanal 0.013 ± 0.0001577.4
8Tridecanal 0.011 ± 0.0031676.5
9Tetradecanal0.001 ± 0.0011774.80.051 ± 0.0021774.8
10Pentadecanal 0.012 ± 0.0011876.8
11Hexadecanal 0.068 ± 0.0041976.9
12Octadecanal 0.065 ± 0.0102177.4
Alkynes0.00% 0.07%
1Pentadecine 0.009 ± 0.0021744.4
2Hexadecine 0.007 ± 0.0001849.8
3Octadecine 0.054 ± 0.0022017
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cázares-Samaniego, P.J.; Castillo, C.G.; Ramos-López, M.A.; González-Chávez, M.M. Volatilome and Essential Oil of Ulomoides dermestoides: A Broad-Spectrum Medical Insect. Molecules 2021, 26, 6311. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26206311

AMA Style

Cázares-Samaniego PJ, Castillo CG, Ramos-López MA, González-Chávez MM. Volatilome and Essential Oil of Ulomoides dermestoides: A Broad-Spectrum Medical Insect. Molecules. 2021; 26(20):6311. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26206311

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cázares-Samaniego, Paulina J., Claudia G. Castillo, Miguel A. Ramos-López, and Marco M. González-Chávez. 2021. "Volatilome and Essential Oil of Ulomoides dermestoides: A Broad-Spectrum Medical Insect" Molecules 26, no. 20: 6311. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26206311

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop