Next Article in Journal
Inhibitors of Fumarylacetoacetate Hydrolase Domain Containing Protein 1 (FAHD1)
Next Article in Special Issue
The Antifungal Action Mode of N-Phenacyldibromobenzimidazoles
Previous Article in Journal
Promise of the NLRP3 Inflammasome Inhibitors in In Vivo Disease Models
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 26
Issue 16
10.3390/molecules26165008
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

In Vitro Anti-Candida Activity and Action Mode of Benzoxazole Derivatives

by
Monika Staniszewska
1,*,
Łukasz Kuryk
2,3,
Aleksander Gryciuk
4,
Joanna Kawalec
4,
Marta Rogalska
4,
Joanna Baran
1,4,
Edyta Łukowska-Chojnacka
4 and
Anna Kowalkowska
4,*
1
Centre for Advanced Materials and Technologies CEZAMAT, Warsaw University of Technology, Poleczki 19, 02-822 Warsaw, Poland
2
Department of Virology, National Institute of Public Health-NIH-National Research Institute, Chocimska 24, 00-791 Warsaw, Poland
3
Clinical Science, Targovax Oy, Saukonpaadenranta 2, 00180 Helsinki, Finland
4
Faculty of Chemistry, Warsaw University of Technology, Noakowskiego St. 3, 00-664 Warsaw, Poland
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2021, 26(16), 5008; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26165008
Received: 15 July 2021 / Revised: 8 August 2021 / Accepted: 12 August 2021 / Published: 18 August 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of Novel Antifungals)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
A newly synthetized series of N-phenacyl derivatives of 2-mercaptobenzoxazole, including analogues of 5-bromo- and 5,7-dibromobenzoxazole, were screened against Candida strains and the action mechanism was evaluated. 2-(1,3-benzoxazol-2-ylsulfanyl)-1-(4-bromophenyl)ethanone (5d), 2-(1,3-benzoxazol-2-ylsulfanyl)-1-(2,3,4-trichloro-phenyl)ethanone (5i), 2-(1,3-benzoxazol-2-ylsulfanyl)-1-(2,4,6-trichlorophenyl)ethanone (5k) and 2-[(5-bromo-1,3-benzoxazol-2-yl)sulfanyl]-1-phenylethanone (6a) showed anti-C. albicans SC5314 activity, where 5d displayed MICT = 16 µg/mL (%R = 100) and a weak anti-proliferative activity against the clinical strains: C. albicans resistant to azoles (Itr and Flu) and C. glabrata. Derivatives 5k and 6a displayed MICP = 16 µg/mL and %R = 64.2 ± 10.6, %R = 88.0 ± 9.7, respectively, against the C. albicans isolate. Derivative 5i was the most active against C. glabrata (%R = 53.0 ± 3.5 at 16 µg/mL). Benzoxazoles displayed no MIC against C. glabrata. Benzoxazoles showed a pleiotropic action mode: (1) the total sterols content was perturbed; (2) 2-(1,3-benzoxazol-2-ylsulfanyl)-1-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)ethanol and 2-(1,3-benzoxazol-2-ylsulfanyl)-1-(2,3,4-trichlorophenyl)ethanol (8h–i) at the lowest fungistatic conc. inhibited the efflux of the Rho123 tracker during the membrane transport process; (3) mitochondrial respiration was affected/inhibited by the benzoxazoles: 2-(1,3-benzoxazol-2-ylsulfanyl)-1-(4-chlorophenyl)ethanol and 2-(1,3-benzoxazol-2-ylsulfanyl)-1-(4-bromophenyl)ethanol 8c–d and 8i. Benzoxazoles showed comparable activity to commercially available azoles due to (1) the interaction with exogenous ergosterol, (2) endogenous ergosterol synthesis blocking as well as (3) membrane permeabilizing properties typical of AmB. Benzoxazoles display a broad spectrum of anti-Candida activity and action mode towards the membrane without cross-resistance with AmB; furthermore, they are safe to mammals.

1. Introduction

Fungal diseases represent a critical worldwide health problem and they are one of the main causes of morbidity and mortality. Moreover, only a few classes of antifungals are currently available to treat patients with fungal infections due to their high toxicity [1]. Therefore, it is still relevant to develop new alternative compounds, without harmful side-effects for patients, to prevent the emergence of fungal resistance. We, thus, undertook in vitro studies of anti-Candida’s potential of new benzoxazoles. The benzoxazole ring is an important pharmacophore, that has for years been used to synthesize new biologically active compounds, including antifungal ones [2,3,4,5,6,7,8]. Among these compounds, there are derivatives of benzoxazoles active against Candida spp. [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12]. Taking into account the structure of the compounds: 5–8, the confirmed activity of the 2-mercaptobenzoxazole derivatives against Candida spp. is particularly important [13,14]. On the other hand, the compounds S-functionalized with the phenacyl or halogen-phenacyl group also exhibit antifungal activity [14,15,16,17,18,19,20].
This prompted us to synthesize the N-phenacyl derivatives of 2-mercaptobenzoxazole, including analogues of 5-bromo- and 5,7-dibromobenzoxazoles. The ketones were reduced to respective alcohols. In the study, we evaluated the toxicity of various benzoxazoles towards the mammalian cell lines as well as the fungistatic and fungicidal effect against the reference and clinical isolates resistant to azoles. The exogenous ergosterol affinity of the most active and randomly selected benzoxazoles was tested. Benzoxazoles inhibitory activity towards ergosterol synthesis was studied using the biochemical (high-performance liquid chromatography HPLC) and spectrophotometric method (SPE). Benzoxazole permeability/lytic activity against the fungal membrane was assessed via flow cytometry. Benzoxazoles exhibit the candidacidal mechanism via accidental cell death (ACD).

2. Results

2.1. Synthesis of Benzoxazoles

The synthesis of benzoxazole derivatives 5–8 is outlined in Scheme 1 and Scheme 2, as well as benzoxazoles summarized in Table 1. At first, 5-bromo-2-mercaptobenzoxazole 2 and 5,7-dibromo-2-mercaptobenzoxazole 3 were obtained according to procedures reported earlier [21] with the modification of one step. Instead of using a mixture of stannous chloride dihydrate and concentrated hydrochloric acid in a methanol reduction in the respective nitrophenols [21], it was carried out by NaBH4 in the presence of activated carbon in the THF-H2O mixture [22]. Ketones 5–7 were synthesized from 2-mercaptobenzoxazoles 1–3 and phenacyl bromides or chlorides 4 by S-alkylation carried out in the K2CO2/MeCN system (Scheme 1). Derivatives of 2-mercaptobenzoxazole 5 were easily obtained in high yields, while in the case of bromo-derivatives 6–7, more by-products were formed, so their yields were lower.
Reduction in ketones 5 with NaBH4 in MeOH in room temperature afforded the mixture of products, alcohols 8 and respective 2-hydroxybenzoxazoles [23]. Decreasing of the reduction temperature to 0–3 °C allowed to obtain compounds 8 with moderate to good yields (Scheme 2). All alcohols 8 were isolated, but some of them turned out to be unstable not only at room temperature, but even when stored in the refrigerator (ca 3–5 °C). Additionally, attempts to obtain respective alcohols, derivatives of bromobenzoxazoles 9 and 10, by the reduction in ketones 6 and 7 were rather unsuccessful, because of the formation of complicated mixtures of products. All alcohols 9 and 10, isolated in low yields and moderate purity, were unstable so they were not fully characterized and biologically tested.
All new stable compounds were fully characterized by 1H NMR, 13C NMR, IR and HRMS analyses.
Table
Table 1. Yields of ketones 5, 6, 7 and alcohols 8.
Table 1. Yields of ketones 5, 6, 7 and alcohols 8.
Lp.Benzoxazole4, ArCOCH2X aKetone (%)Alcohol (%)
11C6H55a [24,25,26,27]988a− b
214-FC6H45b918b88
314-ClC6H45c [24]958c91
414-BrC6H45d [24,27]968d95
512,4-F2C6H35e888e57
612,4-Cl2C6H35f878f61
712,5-Cl2C6H35g918g37 c
813,4-Cl2C6H35h678h73
912,3,4-Cl3C6H25i928i87
1012,4,5-Cl3C6H25j918j89
1112,4,6-Cl3C6H25k648k− d
122C6H56a719a39 c,e
1324-FC6H46b559b36 c,e
143C6H57a5310a33 c,e
1534-FC6H47b3910b− e
(a) Phenacyl bromide (Ar = C6H5, X = Br) and 4-chlorophenacyl bromide (Ar = 4-ClC6H4, X = Br) were used; for all other compounds 4, X = Cl. (b) Decomposition before purification. (c) Compound unstable. (d) Compound containing some by-products. (e) The mixture impossible to separate.

2.2. Anti-Candida Activity of Benzoxazoles

After the appropriate 48 h incubation time, the presence of growth was assessed visually and using the spectrophotometric method (SPE). Derivatives: 5d, 5i, 5k and 6a showed anti-C. albicans SC5314 ATCC activity (Table 2, Tables S1 and S2), where 5d displayed the total visual MICT after 48 h. Cell growth inhibition (SPE end-point %R) and MIC were also determined (Table 3, Tables S3 and S4) against the Candida clinical isolates. Derivatives 5k or 6a at 16 µg/mL showed the MICP partial values and, respectively, cell inhibition app. at % = 64.2 ± 10.6 or % = 88.0 ± 9.7 against the C. albicans isolates (Table 2). Among the tested benzoxazoles, 5i was the most active at 16 µg/mL against C. glabrata (% = 53.0 ± 3.5 in Table 3 and % = 36.9 ± 4.1 in Table S4). Benzoxazole’s MIC was not observed against the C. glabrata isolate.

2.3. Assessment of the Cytotoxicity against the Mammalian Cell Lines

In the study, the primary cell lines suitable and routinely employed for the compound cytotoxic examination were tested [29,30]. These lines were temporarily available in our laboratory and they were chosen due to the most sensitive models used for assessing the toxicity of compounds [29,30].
Among 5d, 6a and 7a tested against the Vero cells, a moderate cytotoxic effect (≤63.8% ± 8.7) was observed at 256 µg/mL (Table 4 and Table S5). In the case of these compounds, a weak or lack of cytotoxicity (app. at 18.4% ± 0.4 to 2.1 ± 0.1) at the conc. ranged from 128 to 1 µg/mL against Vero was noted. Derivatives 5a or 5j at 512 µg/mL showed a cytotoxicity, respectively, at 40.64% ± 3.0 or 50.75% ± 0.0. Contrariwise, 8h, 8c, 8i and 8d at the range of conc. starting from 512 to 128 µg/mL displayed a strong cytotoxicity (84.38% ± 0.1–63.26% ± 0.3) against MRC-5 (Table 4 and Table S6). To sum up, the tested benzoxazoles at the antifungal concentrations showed a lack of cytotoxicity against the mammalian cells.

2.4. Estimation of the Ergosterol Content in the Benzoxazole-Treated Candida Blastoconidia

The results of the spectrophotometric (SPE) analyses showed a conc.-dependent decrease in the ergosterol content when the C. albicans ref. strain was grown, respectively, at conc. of 16 or 4 µg/mL of 5d (Table 5). In comparison to the untreated control, the mean of the total ergosterol content in the 5d-treated C. albicans ref. strain decreased app. by 1.3-fold at 16 µg/mL and 1.2-fold at 4 µg/mL. Derivative 5d displayed the reverse action mode against the C. albicans isolate, e.g., 1.3-fold at 16 µg/mL and 1.7-fold increase at 4 µg/mL. Exposure of the ref. cells to 6a or 7a generated a higher ergosterol content at 16 µg/mL with a mean decrease in the total of its content, app. by one-fold (6a and 7a) for the ref. strain vs. the untreated control. The 6a- or 7a-treated clinical isolate displayed the mean decrease app. by 1-fold (6a and 7a) at conc. of 16 µg/mL and by 1.5-fold at 4 µg/mL, compared to the untreated control. Using the SPE analyses, we showed that the differences in the ergosterol content between the benzoxazole-treated vs. untreated control were statistically significant (p = 0.003).
Moreover, the ergosterol content was measured using HPLC (Table 6 and Table S7). Interestingly, when applying 5d at 16 µg/mL (MICT), the treatment favoured the increase in the ergosterol content app. by 0.9-fold vs. the untreated control, while 4 µg/mL inhibited the ergosterol content app. by 1.3-fold vs. the control (Table 6). Contrariwise, we observed a 1.5- or 1.3-fold-decreased ergosterol content, respectively, for 6a or 7a at 16 µg/mL vs. the untreated control. The content of ergosterol in the ref. strain was reduced in the range of 1.2-1.5-fold for all the tested compounds at 4 µg/mL. In the case of the clinical isolate, 7a at conc. of 16 µg/mL induced 0.9-fold higher ergosterol vs. the untreated control. On the contrary, 5d or 6a at 16 µg/mL reduced the ergosterol content by 1.9- or 3-fold, respectively, vs. the untreated control. These compounds at 4 µg/mL reduced the content of ergosterol by the following levels: 1-fold (5d), 2-fold (6a) or 1.4 (7a). Using HPLC, we showed the statistically significant differences in the ergosterol content between the benzoxazole-treated and the untreated control (p = 0.007).
Based on the method comparison studies (Regression and Pearson correlation coefficient), it was shown that there was a large bias in these two methods used to assess the ergosterol content. The Pearson correlation coefficient (r = 0.5) and p = 0.12 indicated a moderate correlation between these two methods. The SPE method produced slightly more accruable results due to the smaller p-value. In spite of this, there was p < 0.05 for these two methods; thus, both were worth applying.

2.5. Cell Death Assessment Using Flow Cytometry

To assess the ability of the benzoxazole derivatives to induce accidental cell death (ACD) in C. albicans, the blastoconidial cells were treated with compounds at 16 µg/mL (Figure 1) or 4 µg/mL (Table S8) and % of the cell death was assessed by the appearance of propidium iodide (PI) staining using flow cytometry. We found that the treatment of the cells with benzoxazoles led to an irreversible plasma membrane breakdown (app. ~99.52%) vs. the untreated blastoconidial control (99.77%). Additionally, benzoxazoles at 16 or 4 µg/mL induced necrosis in the C. albicans protoplasts.

2.6. Efflux Study in the Benzoxazole-Treated C. albicans Cells

The least active fungistatic compounds were tested for the Rho123 efflux at the highest (160 or 16 µg/mL) or the lowest (1.25 or 0.125 µg/mL) antifungal conc. tested (Figure 2, Table S9). The SPE reading revealed that 5j and 8h at 0.125 µg/mL as well as 5a and 5e at 16 µg/mL increased the efflux vs. the untreated control (OD600nm = 3901). Generally, the fungistatic compounds tested at lower conc. induced the cell efflux activity. In details, when all compounds at two different conc. were tested, there were differences in the efflux as follows: 5j (1-fold increase in the efflux at the lowest conc. tested vs. the highest one); 8d (1.2-fold); 5a and 8c (1.6-fold); 5e (1.7-fold). On the contrary, 8i caused a decrease in the efflux (4.6-fold) at the lowest conc. tested vs. the highest one. Although all benzoxazoles exhibited a comparable fungistatic effect, they showed a diversity in the cell efflux inhibition. Derivatives: 8c, 8i and 8d inhibited the blastoconidial efflux. The Rho123 efflux in the benzoxazole-treated SC5314 was stimulated by the glucose addition, but since it gradually decreased along with the increasing concentration of 8d, this derivative was taken as an illustrative example.

2.7. Determination of Antifungal Activity of Benzoxazole Derivatives in the Presence of Exogenous Ergosterol

To address whether exogenous ergosterol could relieve benzoxazole stress in C. albicans, blastoconidia at log phase were harvested and then treated with benzoxazoles at various concentrations in a medium containing ergosterol at 20 mM (Figure 3 and Figure S1). The itraconazole-treated blastoconidia in the medium supplemented with ergosterol and blastoconidia growing in the medium containing ergosterol were used as the controls. After 96 h of 8d or 8f treatment, the blastoconidial cell survival slightly decreased at the highest concentrations of compounds. The activity of 8d and 8f was comparable to Itr. Thus, the results were consistent with the antifungal activity of Itr, showing that exogenous ergosterol reduced the C. albicans tolerance to 8d and 8f. Differences in the antifungal effect between Itr and 5e as well as Itr vs. 8h were noted.
As it was shown in Figure S1, benzoxazoles 5a, 5j, 8c and 8i displayed no interaction with ergosterol as the curves differed from the Itr action. The curves of 5a, 5j, 8c and 8i differed from Itr vs. the growth control curves.

2.8. Anti-Candida Effect of Benzoxazole Derivatives Combined with Amphotericin B (AmB). FIC Index Calculation

As it was shown in Table 7, we summarized the combined activities of 5d with amphotericin (AmB) in the in vitro checkboard interactions against C. glabrata. The FIC index interpretations for the activities of 5d with AmB against C. glabrata recorded an indifference for all combinations. Synergism or antagonism were not recorded for any combinations.

3. Discussion

The library of 23 benzoxazoles featuring 2-mercaptobenzoxazole with the phenacyl moiety or respective alcohols was screened for the anti-Candida activity (Table 2 and Table 3, Tables S1–S4). The active derivatives 5d, 5i, 5k and 6a (MICT/P = 16 µg/mL) were tested against the C. albicans clinical isolates (resistant to Flu and Itr) and C. glabrata displaying an intrinsically decreased susceptibility to azoles [33]. 2,4,6-Trichlorophenacyl- (5k) or 5-bromobenzoxazole (6a) derivatives showed modest activity (spectrophotometric SPE end-point of %R = 64.2 ± 10.6 and %R = 88.0 ± 9.7 at 16 µg/mL) against the C. albicans clinical strain, respectively. The 2,3,4-trichlorophenacyl derivative (5i) exerted the most potent anti-C. glabrata action (%R = 53.0 ± 3.5 at 16 µg/mL). In spite of the total MICT = 16 µg/mL (%R = 100.3 ± 3.2) against the reference strain, 5d functionalized with the 4-bromophenacyl group displaying low activity against both azole-resistant isolates (Table 3). The structure activity relationship clearly indicated that the bromo- or chloro-substituted 2-mercaptobenzoxazole with the phenacyl moiety showed activity against the Candida reference and clinical azole-resistant strains. Contrary to the literature data [34], the fluoro derivatives were not among the most active compounds. It was evident from the results (Table 4 and Tables S5 and S6) that all benzoxazoles at 128 µg/mL displayed more than 81.6% ± 1.8 of the Vero cell viability. The MRC-5 cells showed a viability of app. ≥18.9% when treated with 8h or 8c–d, 8i at 512 µg/mL, as well as a ≥ 50.0% cell viability when treated with 5a, 5e or 5j.
We tested the capacity of benzoxazoles to inhibit the ergosterol synthesis (Table 5 and Table 6). The results showed 5d’s conc. dependent decrease in the ergosterol content when the C. albicans ref. strain was grown, respectively, at conc. of 16 or 4 µg/mL. In comparison to the untreated control, the mean of the total ergosterol content decreased in the 5d-treated C. albicans ref. (1.3-fold at 16 µg/mL and 1.2-fold at 4 µg/mL). The above was consistent with the cell proliferation inhibition data (in Table 2, Tables S1 and S2), where MIC’s 5d against SC5314 was the total and %R = 100 was noted. Contrariwise, 5d displayed the reverse action mode against the C. albicans isolate, e.g., the ergosterol content increase of app. 1.3-fold at 16 µg/mL and 1.7-fold at 4 µg/mL vs. the untreated control (Table 5 and Table S7). Derivative 5d displayed weak anti-proliferative activity against the following isolates: the C. albicans resistant to azoles and C. glabrata. HPLC analyses showed that 5d at 16 µg/mL generated the one-fold increase in ergosterol vs. the untreated control, while the C. albicans isolate showed a decrease in ergosterol in line with the increasing concentration of compounds (Table 6).
Exposure to 6a or 7a generated a high ergosterol content at 16 µg/mL with the mean decrease in the total ergosterol content of app. one-fold (6a or 7a) for the ref. strain vs. the untreated control. The 6a- or 7a-treated clinical isolate displayed a mean decrease of one-fold (6a or 7a) compared to the untreated control (Table 5). Our SPE results of the endogenous sterol quantification (sterols decreased app. 1.2-fold at 16 µg/mL) were consistent with the inhibition of cell proliferation data (SPE reading of end-point % = 100 in Table 2), where 5d = MICT against the SC5314 ref and the cell growth reduction (%R = 100) were noted. Additionally, a close agreement between the sterol quantification and broth microdilution results was seen previously by Arthington-Skaggs et al. [35]. Our HPLC results (Table 6 and Table S7) of the increased endogenous ergosterol in the clinical cells treated with 5d at 16 µg/mL corresponded with Arthington-Skaggs’s et al. [35] studies on azoles inducing the trailing growth phenomenon. In line with the results of Suchodolski et al. [36] for the strain displaying an uninterrupted ergosterol synthesis, we showed the highest ergosterol accumulation of an app. 0.9-fold increase in the 16 µg/mL-treated ref. strain vs. the untreated control. Since ergosterol was a target for azoles, we showed that the ergosterol content was unsettled in the benzoxazole-treated ref. cells compared to the untreated control (Table 5 and Table 6). While the way of ergosterol depletion in the 5d-treated Candida still has to be elucidated, we clearly demonstrated that the trailing growth phenomenon classified 5d as active against the blastoconidial cells. Interestingly, the outcomes of our work point to the plasma membrane as a key player in the benzoxazoles’ anti-Candida action (Figure 1, Figure 2 and Figure 3 and Tables S8 and S9 and Figure S1). In compliance with the studies of [37], showing that the ERG genes catalysing the late step in ergosterol synthesis were upregulated when the sterol levels were reduced, we concluded that benzoxazoles at MICT (5d) and MICP (6a and 7a) were subjected to the negative feedback regulation of the ergosterol biosynthesis [37]. We showed that the fungal cell wall is not a barrier to the action mode of benzoxazoles-inducing pyroptosis of the cells and protoplasts at a comparable percentage. Analysing ACD, no changes in susceptibility were noted for benzoxazoles that acted in spite of the cell wall presence (Figure 1) The benzoxazole mechanism was related to the weakened plasma membrane which may have lysed in the presence of MIC and sub-MIC conc. It was shown that the most selected active benzoxazoles induced ACD (Figure 1). Moreover, the tested compounds altered the membrane transport. As we showed (Figure 2), the accumulation of the lipophilic molecules, such as the Rho123 dye, was reduced in the C. albicans strains. Thus, when the benzoxazole (5j or 8h) treatment was conducted, the lipophilic molecule, such as the Rho123 tracker, was reduced in the uptake and/or retention in blastoconidials. It was noted that the total conc. of Rho123 in the loading medium was higher (from 1- to 3.3-fold) than within the cells when a lower conc. of 5a, 5e, 5j and 8h was tested. Our observation demonstrated that mitochondrial respiration was affected/inhibited by the benzoxazoles 8c–d and 8i. Although, all benzoxazoles exhibited a comparably weak fungistatic effect, they showed diversity in the cell efflux inhibition. The disparity was due to the sequestration of Rho123, leading to the heterogenous sub-cellular localization [38]. The degree of intracellular sequestration was compound-dependent with 8c–d and 8i at a higher conc., showing a stronger sequestration of ~3.3-fold vs. the lower conc. Therefore, the derivatives substituted with Cl or Br at C-4 or trisubstituted with Cl at C-2,3,4 blocked the fluorophore dye diffuse out of the sequestrating body in the blastoconidial cells. Thus, benzoxazoles could be the uptake transporter of ABCD1′s substrates [39]. Thus, in line with the latter authors [39], we showed that benzoxazoles could inhibit both the passive (micelle-mediated passive diffusion) and the active process occurring via ABC transporters. Moreover, benzoxazoles caused a lethal irreversibility starting with the collapse of the membrane transport through the formation of a leak (Figure 1). We monitored the cell membrane integrity using a PI transported passively into the blastoconidia. We quantified the loss of survival using flow cytometry and determining PI positivity in the benzoxazole-treated cells (Figure 1). Benzoxazole 5j appeared as the most effective compound inducing an efflux (Cefflux = 16 μg/mL or 1.25 μg/mL). This could have be expected, when CDR1 was overexpressed in Candida [40]. Derivative 8h at Cefflux = 1.25 μg/mL was also the most potent inducer of the Rho123 efflux in C. albicans, although this value was app. by 4.6-fold higher than at 0.125 μg/mL.
The interaction with ergosterol and MIC showed that there was a specific interaction of 8d or 8f with ergosterol, which led to the inhibition of the cell growth (Figure 3). A PI leakage assay (Figure 1) employed in our study supported the hypothesis that benzoxazoles form pores in the fungal membrane similarly to AmB [40]. Since Itr inhibited the ergosterol synthesis and it did not form pores, the latter action mode was the case for 8d and 8f. Based on our results of the ergosterol interactions and Rho123 efflux, benzoxazoles (8d and 8f) induced a leakage in ergosterol even at a very high concentration (1200 µg/mL in Figure 3). This indicates that benzoxazoles acted via the membrane barrier perturbation. Thus, benzoxazoles killed yeasts by permeabilizing the plasma membrane (Figure 1). Moreover, they had a similar mode of action as that of Itr inhibiting the ergosterol synthesis [41].
Based on our scaffold screening, derivatives substituted with Br and Cl facilitated the interaction with the negatively charged fungal membrane. They showed the ability to form an amphipathic secondary structure that permitted the incorporation into the outer leaflet of the bilayer of the membrane [42]. In line with Maurya et al. [42], we concluded that benzoxazoles showed a specific antifungal mechanism: an increased permeability and alterations in the cytoplasmic membrane (especially in ergosterol) without the mammalian cell toxicity (lack of ergosterol). Since the sterole-rich membrane was involved in the endo-, exocytosis and efflux, the mode of action of benzoxazoles was related to the important function of ergosterol in yeasts. Benzoxazoles inhibited these important processes by binding to ergosterol; thus, sterols could not perform their functional effects [43]. In line with Escalante et al. [44] and Virág et al. [45], during the interaction of 8d and 8f with ergosterol, we considered the possible formation of complexes between the carboxyl group of ergosterol and the OH groups of benzoxazoles (dative bounds) as well as hydrogen bounds. The activity of 5a, 5j, 8i and 8c (Figure S1) remained unchanged in the presence of exogenous ergosterol, suggesting that they did not interact with the membrane ergosterol.
In general, benzoxazoles can be considered as effective, safe and stable and could be used alone or in a combination therapy with AmB to treat candidiasis (including azole-resistant strains). Since the azoles’ efficiency is limited by the development of Candida resistance, we introduced the benzoxazoles active against the clinical isolates resistant to azoles. We selected benzoxazoles reducing efflux pumps; thus, the increase in the number of compounds taken up by the blastoconidia resulted from changes in the ergosterol cell membrane. The intracellular accumulation of benzoxazoles was dependent on an inactive efflux of compound out of the cells. Clearly, further work needs to be undertaken to unravel benzoxazole’s influence on the expression of the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) encoded by the CDR transporters and the major facilitator (MF) encoded by MDR1. Benzoxazoles based on their ergosterol biosynthesis-inhibiting capacity, membrane permeabilization activity and increased activity against the azole-resistant isolates, could be an interesting approach to address the problem of resistance. To conclude, the antifungal action of benzoxazoles and the lack of cytotoxicity as well as physico-chemical properties, e.g., good stability, water solubility, rendered 5d a potential candidate for the development of new antifungal drugs.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Synthesis of Benzoxazoles

Commercially available reagents from Sigma-Aldrich, Fluka and Avantor were used as supplied. Thin-layer chromatography was carried out on TLC aluminium plates with silica gel Kieselgel 60 F254 (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) (0.2 mm thickness film). The column chromatography was performed using Silica gel 60 (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) of 40–63 μm.
The melting points were measured with a commercial apparatus Thomas Hoover “UNI-MELT” (Thomas, Woonsocket, RI, USA) on samples placed in glass capillary tubes and were not corrected. Infrared (IR) spectra were taken on a Carl Zeiss SPECORD M80 instrument (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany).
The 1H and 13C NMR spectra were measured with a Varian 500 spectrometer (Varian, Palo Alto, CA, USA) operating at 500 MHz for 1H and 125 MHz for 13C nuclei. Chemical shifts (δ) were given in parts per million (ppm) relative to the residual solvent signal (CDCl3, δH of residual CHCl3 7.26 ppm); signal multiplicity assignment: s, singlet; br s, broad singlet; d, doublet; dd, doublet of doublets; ddd, doublet of doublets of doublets; m, multiplet. Coupling constant (J) was given in hertz (Hz). All these measurements were conducted in Warsaw University of Technology.
High-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) was carried out on Q Exactive Hybrid Quadrupole-Orbitrap Mass Spectrometer, ESI (electrospray) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Bremen, Germany) with spray voltage 4.00 kV at IBB PAS Warsaw. The most intensive signals were reported. Ketones 5–7 were synthesized according to procedures reported previously [21,22].

4.2. Synthesis of 2-amino-4-bromophenol

To a stirred suspension of 4-bromo-2-nitrophenol (23 mmol, 5 g) in H2O (30 mL) and THF (15 mL), activated carbon (9.2 g) was added. The mixture was heated to 50–60 °C, NaBH4 (180 mmol, 6.81 g) was added carefully in portions keeping the temperature within the range of 50–70 °C (ca 2–3 h). The reaction was carried out in 60–70 °C (typically 0.5–2 h) and monitored by TLC (hexane/acetate 9/1 v/v). After full conversion of bromonitrophenol, the mixture was cooled, EtOAc (100 mL) was added, stirring was continued overnight, filtered through a pad of celite, washed with EtOAc (100 mL, in portions), phases were separated, the organic phase was dried (MgSO4) and evaporated to dryness. 4-Bromo-2-aminophenol was obtained as orange solid (3.76 g, ca 87%) and used without purification for synthesis of 5-bromo-2-mercaptobenzoxazole 2.

4.3. Synthesis of 2-amino-4,6-dibromophenol

According to procedure reported above, 4,6-dibromo-2-nitrophenol (20.2 mmol, 6 g) in suspension with H2O (20 mL), THF (10 mL) and activated carbon (8 g) was reduced with NaBH4 (160 mmol, 6.05 g). 4,6-Dibromo-2-aminophenol was obtained as orange solid (4.32 g, ca 80%) and used without purification for synthesis of 5,7-dibromo-2-mercaptobenzoxazole 3.

4.4. General Procedure for Synthesis of Ketones 5–7

To a stirred solution of 2-mercaptobenzoxazole 1–3 (10 mmol) in MeCN (40 mL) K2CO3 (15 mmol), appropriate amount of phenacyl chloride or bromide (10 mmol) was added. The reaction was carried out at room temperature (20–22 °C) and monitored by TLC (hexane/acetate 9/1 v/v). After full conversion of substrates (typically 1 h, for 5k 24 h), the mixture was poured on ice (120 g), the crude product was filtered, washed with H2O and dried on air. Ketones 5 were purified by crystallization, 6 and 7 by column chromatography. After full conversion of substrates (typically 1 h, for 5k 24 h), the mixture was poured on ice (120 g), the crude product was filtered, washed with water and dried on air. Crude ketones 5 were used for synthesis of alcohols 8 and purified by crystallization for biological research. Ketones 6 and 7 were purified by column chromatography (hexane/EtOAc, gradient, 50/0 to 50/5 v/v).

4.5. General Procedure for Synthesis of Alcohols 8

To a stirred suspension of ketone 5 (8 mmol) in MeOH (40 mL) cooled to 0–2 °C, NaBH4 (12 mmol) was added in portions keeping the temperature below 2–3 °C (ca 0.5 h). The reaction was carried out at 0–2 °C and monitored by TLC (hexane/acetate 5/1 v/v). After full conversion of ketone 5 (typically 1–3 h), the mixture was poured on ice (120 g). Solid products (8b,c,d,i) were filtered and washed with H2O. Oily products were extracted with EtOAc (3 × 50 mL), washed with H2O (5 × 50 mL), dried (MgSO4), filtered and evaporated. Alcohols 8 were purified by crystallization (hexane/EtOAc 10/1 v/v) or by column chromatography (hexane/EtOAc, gradient, 50/0 to 50/5 v/v).

4.6. Fungal Strains and Culture Conditions

Antifungal activity of benzoxazole derivatives was tested against the reference Candida albicans SC5314 strain from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC). Additionally, two clinical isolates were used in biological activity testing: C. albicans (fluconazole- and itraconazole-resistant) and C. glabrata. The strains were stored at −80 °C in Microbank system (Pro-Lab Diagnostics, Round Rock, TX, USA). Prior to biological examinations, yeasts were cultured overnight in YEPD (Yeast Extract Peptone Dextrose) or in RPMI 1640 (Roswell Park Memorial Institute, NY, Buffalo, USA) at 30 °C with shaking at 100 rpm. Then, cells were harvested at 3,000 rpm for 5 min at 4 °C and washed twice with sterile water. The final inoculum ranged from 1.9 × 107 to 4.0 × 108 CFU/mL.

4.7. In Vitro Antifungal Activity

Antifungal activity was assessed using broth microdilution assay according to the reference CLSI (Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute) M27-A3 method [13,28,46]. Stock solution of compounds (1600 μg/mL) was prepared in 96% DMSO. Initial inoculum was 105-fold diluted in sterile water and then 1:20 in a medium. Sets of compound test wells (CTW) and sterility control wells (SCW) were prepared in 96-well plates in triplicate for each conc. containing the tested compounds and inoculum (CTW) or sterile water instead of inoculum (SCW) in YEPD or RPMI 1640 medium. Growth control wells (GCW) with inoculum and DMSO (the same amount as in the CTW/SCW wells) in suitable medium were prepared. Plates were incubated for 18 h at 30 °C and evaluated using Synergy H4 Hybrid Reader (BioTek Instruments, Winooski, VT, USA) or with Spark Control M10 (Tecan Group, Männedorf, Switzerland) at 405 nm. Percentage of cell growth inhibition was calculated as follows: % of inhibition = 100 × (1 − (ODCTW − ODSCW)/(ODGCW − ODSCW). MIC (Minimum Inhibitory Concentration) was determined as the lowest concentration in which a prominent decrease in growth was visible according to the standard criteria from CLSI [28].

4.8. Cytotoxicity Assay In Vitro

Cytotoxicity of 5d, 6a and 7a was assessed against mammal Vero cell line (ATCC CCL-81, LGC Standards, Poland) using MTS test (3-(4.5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium, MTS, Promega, USA) and for 5a, 5e, 5j, 8c, 8d, 8h, and 8i against mammal MRC-5 cell line (ATCC CCL-171) by MTT assay (3-(4.5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2.5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide, MTT, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) [47,48]. Vero and MRC-5 cell lines were maintained in EMEM (Eagle’s Minimum Essential Medium (Merck SA, Darmstadt, Germany) supplemented with 10% FBS (foetal bovine serum, Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Dublin, Irlandia) and 1% antibiotics at 37 °C and 5% CO2. Cells were incubated in 96-well microtiter plates for 24 h. Vero and MRC-5 cell monolayers were treated with different conc. of the benzoxazoles. Following 10 μL of MTS or MTT, reagents were added to each well and then each plate was incubated for 3 h in darkness.
The optical densities were measured at 490 nm (for MTS assay) and 495 nm (for MTT assay) with 660 nm as the reference wavelength using Synergy H4 Hybrid Reader (BioTek Instruments, Winooski, VT, USA) or Spark Control M10 (Tecan Group, Männedorf, Switzerland). Specific absorbance (SA) was calculated using the following formula: SA = A490/495 − A660. The cytotoxicity was calculated using the following formula: % cytotoxicity = (SA Positive control − SA Test)/(SA Positive control − SA Blank) × 100. Positive control means Vero or MCR-5 monolayer in EMEM and Blank means EMEM with tested conc. of compounds [31].

4.9. Ergosterol Estimation Assay Using Spectrophotometry and HPLC

Extraction of ergosterol was performed as previously described in literature with slight modifications [49]. Samples containing 0.5 mL of initial inoculum and tested compound (or no compound in growth controls) in YEPD (final volume 5 mL) were incubated for 24 h at 30 °C with shaking at 100 rpm. Cells were harvested using 3000 rpm for 5 min at 4 °C and washed with sterile water. The wet weight of the cell pellet was determined at the range of 0.04–0.09 g. Then, saponification was performed as follows: 3 mL of 25% alcoholic potassium hydroxide solution was added to each sample and mixed. Cell suspensions were incubated for 1 h at 85 °C in a water bath. Samples were then left to cool at room temp. Ergosterol was extracted by addition of 1 mL of sterile water and 3 mL of petroleum ether followed by vortex mixing. Organic layers were transferred to different tubes. For spectrophotometric analysis, organic layers were diluted five times with ethanol and then analysed using scanned spectrophotometry between 230 and 300 nm with Synergy H4 Hybrid Reader (BioTek Instruments, Winooski, VT, USA). Ergosterol content was calculated using the sum of ergosterol and 24(28)-dehydroergosterol (DHE. late sterol intermediate) according to the formulas [49,50]: %ergosterol + %DHE = (A282 × 5/290)/pellet weight (g); %DHE = (A230 × 5/518)/pellet weight (g); %ergosterol = (%ergosterol + %DHE) − %DHE.
For quantification of ergosterol by HPLC, organic solvent was evaporated. Sterols were re-dissolved in methanol (HPLC grade) and stored at 4 °C. HPLC analysis were performed using 200 Series Nelson NCI 900 system with UV/VIS detection at 282 nm (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA) and COSMOSIL C18-MS-II column (Nacalai Tesque, Kyoto, Japan). Gradient elusion was performed starting with acetonitrile: methanol 97:3 v/v as the mobile phase.

4.10. Cytometric Analysis of C. albicans Cell Death Type

Protoplasts of C. albicans SC5314 were prepared following the method described in previous article [51]. Cells and protoplasts were treated with 5d, 6a and 7a at conc. of 16 or 4 μg/mL with shaking at 200 rpm at 30 °C for 24 h and cells were treated with the following derivatives: 5e, 5a, 5j, 8h, 8c, 8i, 8d and 8f at 16 μg/mL for 24 h. After centrifugation at 3000 rpm at 4 °C for 5 min, the cells were washed and resuspended in sterile water. Staining was preformed according to the annexin and propidium iodide staining kit’s procedure (FITC Annexin V/Dead Cell Apoptosis Kit with FITC annexin V and PI for flow cytometry (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Dublin, Irlandia) [52]. Suspensions were 10 times diluted in suitable buffer (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Dublin, Irlandia). Then, 1 μL of annexin was added, mixed and after 15 min of incubation on ice, the cells and protoplasts were centrifuged at 6000 rpm and 4 °C for 5 min and resuspended in buffer. Then, 1 μL of PI was added and after 15 min incubation in ice, fluorescence was measured by flow cytometry with BD FACSLyric 2L6C (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) for the compounds 5d, 6a and 7a, and with FACSCanto II (Becton Dickinson, National Institute of Drugs, Warsaw, Poland) for 5e, 5a, 5j, 8h, 8c, 8i, 8d and 8f. Data were analysed with FACSuite Software 1.4 RUO (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA).

4.11. Examination of Rhodamine 123 Efflux in the C. albicans SC5314 Treated with Benzoxazole Derivatives

Procedure was based on the protocol in Gbelska’s article [53,54]. C. albicans SC5314 cells were added to YEPD medium and incubated at 28 °C for 20 h with shaking at 150 rpm. Cells were then washed with water and PBS/NaOH. Two microliters of 2-deoxy-D-glucose and Rhodamine123 (Rho123) both at 20 mM were added to 1 mL of the cell suspended in PBS for each tested compound (5e, 5a, 5j, 8h, 8c, 8i, 8d). After 18 h incubation at 28 °C and 150 rpm, suspensions were centrifuged and cells were washed with water and PBS. Tested compounds were added to final conc. Of 0.125 or 1.25 μg/mL (5j, 8h, 8i) and 16 or 160 μg/mL (5e, 5a, 8c, 8d). Then, 200 μL of 20 mM glucose were then added to cells and after 18 h incubation at 28 °C with shaking at 150 rpm, 100 μL of supernatant was placed into 96-well plate. Fluorescence of Rho123 was examined with excitation at 521 nm and emission at 600 nm using plate reader Spark Control M10 (Tecan Group, Männedorf, Switzerland).

4.12. Antifungal Studies Using Exogenous Ergosterol

To test compounds’ affinity to ergosterol, their antifungal activities in the presence of exogenous ergosterol were examined. Ergosterol (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA) was dissolved in 96% DMSO and Triton X-100 or Tween 20 (to final volumes of 10% and 1%, respectively) [55]. Emulsion was heated, mixed and added to the medium. A 96-well plate was prepared analogically to the reference broth microdilution CLSI M27-A3 method [28]. Compound test wells (CTW) containing C. albicans SC5314 inoculum and separately the following compounds: 5a, 5e, 5j, 8c, 8d, 8f, 8h, 8i, exogenous ergosterol in YPD or RPMI 1640 medium were prepared in triplicates. Sterility control wells (SCW) contained tested compounds and ergosterol in medium. The growth control wells (GCW) contained inoculum, DMSO and ergosterol suspended in medium. Final concentration of exogenous ergosterol in each well was 400 μg/mL. Additionally, for examination antifungal activity of 5a, 5e, 5j, 8c, 8d, 8f, 8h, 8i, wells containing inoculum, ergosterol and itraconazole ITR (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA) in medium (instead of tested derivatives) were prepared. Plates were incubated at 30 °C for 18–96 h and analysed using Synergy H4 Hybrid Reader (BioTek Instruments, Winooski, VT, USA) or with Spark Control M10 (Tecan Group, Männedorf, Switzerland) at 400 or 405 nm.

4.13. Determination of Antifungal Effect of Benzoxazole Derivatives Combined with Amphotericin B (AmB). FIC Index Calculation

To determine Fractional Inhibitory Concentration (FIC) index between 5d and AmB, a modification of checkerboard microdilution method was performed analogically to the CLSI M27-A3 method described above [28]. Compound test wells (CTW) contained as follows: AmB (250 µg/mL; Sigma-Aldrich. USA) (conc. ranging from 2.5 μg/mL to 0.0049 μg/mL) and 5d (16–0.25 μg/mL) or combination of these two compounds. GCW and SCW wells were prepared as described above in CLSI [28]. Samples were placed in 96-well plate and incubated at 30 °C for 96 h. Growth inhibition rate was measured at 405 nm and percentage of cell growth inhibition in each well was calculated. The FIC index was determined using the formula as follows: FIC = C(5d)/MIC(5d) + C(AmB)/MIC(AmB), where MIC of 5d or AmB and C stands for conc. of 5d or AmB in well containing combination of two compounds resulting in at least 50% growth inhibition in a given well in the 96-well microtiter plate in spectrophotometric (SPE) method [56]. Interactions were categorized according to the method of [32] by the following rules: synergism (FIC, ≤0.5), additivity (FIC, >0.5 to ≤1) and indifference (FIC, >1 to <4).

4.14. Statistical Analysis

All experiments were performed in triplicate. Data were represented as mean ± SD. Statistically significant differences (p values ≤0.05) between the control and test values were determined by means of the Wilcoxon-signed rank-matched pair test using SPSS 16.0 software (Spss 16.0 free download). Moreover, the method comparison studies were determined by the means of regression and Pearson correlation coefficient.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online. Figure S1: Interaction between benzoxazoles and ergosterol, Table S1: Antifungal activity of benzoxazole derivatives against C. albicans ATCC SC5314, Table S2. Antifungal activity of benzoxazole derivatives against C. albicans ATCC SC5314, Table S3. Antifungal activity of benzoxazole derivatives against the C. albicans clinical strain, Table S4. Antifungal activity of benzoxazole derivatives against the C. glabrata clinical strain, Table S5. Viability of the Vero cells-treated with benzoxazole derivatives, Table S6. Viability of the MRC-5 cells (mean% ± SD) treated with benzoxazole derivatives, Table S7. Ergosterol content measured by HPLC in C. albicans ATCC SC5314 treated with benzoxazole derivatives compared to the growth control, Table S8. Fraction of the C. albicans ATCC SC5314 cells in accidental cell death (ACD) caused by treatment with benzoxazole derivatives. Table S9. Rho123 efflux in cells treated with benzoxazoles in the MIC’s and sub-MIC’s concentrations.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.S. and A.K.; methodology, M.S.; software, J.B.; validation, M.S., A.K., E.Ł.-C. and Ł.K.; formal analysis, M.S.; investigation, A.G. and J.K.; resources, J.K.; data curation, J.K.; writing—original draft preparation, M.S. and J.K.; writing—review and editing, M.S.; visualization, M.R. and A.G.; supervision, M.S. and Ł.K.; project administration, M.S.; funding acquisition, M.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

M. Staniszewska was financed by the Centre for Advanced Materials and Technologies CEZAMAT, Warsaw University of Technology, Poland. Ł. Kuryk was supported by the grant (BW-3/2021 and 1BWBW/2021) funded by the National Institute of Public Health (NIH)-National Research Institute (NIPH NIH-NRI), Poland. M. Rogalska, Aleksander Gryciuk, Joanna Kawalec and J. Baran were supported by the Faculty of Chemistry, Warsaw University of Technology, Poland. E. Łukowska-Chojnacka and A. Kowalkowska were supported by the Faculty of Chemistry, Warsaw University of Technology, Poland.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Sample Availability

There is no sample availability.

References

  1. De Oliveira Filho, A.A.; de Oliveira, H.M.B.F.; de Sousa, J.P.; Meireles, D.R.P.; de Azevedo Maia, G.L.; Filho, J.M.B.; de Siqueira Júnior, J.P.; Lima, E.O. In vitro anti-Candida activity and mechanism of action of the flavonoid isolated from Praxelis clematidea against Candida albicans species. J. Appl. Pharm. Sci. 2016, 6, 066–069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  2. Sattar, R.; Mukhtar, R.; Atif, M.; Hasnain, M.; Irfan, A. Synthetic transformations and biological screening of benzoxazole derivatives: A review. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 2020, 57, 2079–2107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Luo, B.; Li, D.; Zhang, A.L.; Gao, J.M. Synthesis, antifungal activities and molecular docking studies of benzoxazole and benzothiazole derivatives. Molecules 2018, 23, 2457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  4. Kakkar, S.; Kumar, S.; Narasimhan, B.; Lim, S.M.; Ramasamy, K.; Mani, V.; Shah, S.A.A. Design, synthesis and biological potential of heterocyclic benzoxazole scaffolds as promising antimicrobial and anticancer agents. Chem. Cent. J. 2018, 12, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  5. Singh, S.; Veeraswamy, G.; Bhattarai, D.; Goo, J., II; Lee, K.; Choi, Y. Recent Advances in the Development of Pharmacologically Active Compounds that Contain a Benzoxazole Scaffold. Asian J. Org. Chem. 2015, 4, 1338–1361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kakkar, S.; Tahlan, S.; Lim, S.M.; Ramasamy, K.; Mani, V.; Shah, S.A.A.; Narasimhan, B. Benzoxazole derivatives: Design, synthesis and biological evaluation. Chem. Cent. J. 2018, 12, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Erol, M.; Celik, I.; Uzunhisarcikli, E.; Kuyucuklu, G. Synthesis, Molecular Docking, and DFT Studies of Some New 2,5-Disubstituted Benzoxazoles as Potential Antimicrobial and Cytotoxic Agents. Polycycl. Aromat. Compd. 2020, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. De Carvalho, L.I.S.; Alvarenga, D.J.; Do Carmo, L.C.F.; De Oliveira, L.G.; Silva, N.C.; Dias, A.L.T.; Coelho, L.F.L.; De Souza, T.B.; Dias, D.F.; Carvalho, D.T. Antifungal Activity of New Eugenol-Benzoxazole Hybrids against Candida spp. J. Chem. 2017, 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  9. Zomorodian, K.; Khabnadideh, S.; Sakhteman, A.; Mirjalili, B.B.F.; Ranjbar, M.; Zamani, L. Synthesis and antifungal activity of benzoxazole derivatives with their sar analysis by SAS-MAP. Farmacia 2020, 68, 155–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Padalkar, V.S.; Borse, B.N.; Gupta, V.D.; Phatangare, K.R.; Patil, V.S.; Umape, P.G.; Sekar, N. Synthesis and antimicrobial activity of novel 2-substituted benzimidazole, benzoxazole and benzothiazole derivatives. Arab. J. Chem. 2016, 9, S1125–S1130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  11. Kuroyanagi, J.I.; Kanai, K.; Sugimoto, Y.; Horiuchi, T.; Achiwa, I.; Takeshita, H.; Kawakami, K. 1,3-Benzoxazole-4-carbonitrile as a novel antifungal scaffold of β-1,6-glucan synthesis inhibitors. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2010, 18, 7593–7606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Jayanna, N.D.; Vagdevi, H.M.; Dharshan, J.C.; Raghavendra, R.; Telkar, S.B. Synthesis, antimicrobial, analgesic activity, and molecular docking studies of novel 1-(5,7-dichloro-1,3-benzoxazol-2-yl)-3-phenyl-1H-pyrazole-4-carbaldehyde derivatives. Med. Chem. Res. 2013, 22, 5814–5822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Łukowska-Chojnacka, E.; Mierzejewska, J.; Milner-Krawczyk, M.; Bondaryk, M.; Staniszewska, M. Synthesis of novel tetrazole derivatives and evaluation of their antifungal activity. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2016, 24, 6058–6065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Özdemir, A.; Turan-Zitouni, G.; Asim Kaplancikli, Z.; Revial, G.; Demirci, F.; Işcan, G. Preparation of some pyrazoline derivatives and evaluation of their antifungal activities. J. Enzym. Inhib. Med. Chem. 2010, 25, 565–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kaplancikli, Z.A.; Yurttaş, L.; Özdemir, A.; Turan-Zitouni, G.; Işcan, G.; Akalin, G.; Abu Mohsen, U. Synthesis, anticandidal activity and cytotoxicity of some tetrazole derivatives. J. Enzym. Inhib. Med. Chem. 2014, 29, 43–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Karaburun, A.Ç.; Çevik, U.A.; Osmaniye, D.; Saglık, B.N.; Çavuşoglu, B.K.; Levent, S.; Özkay, Y.; Koparal, A.S.; Behçet, M.; Asım Kaplancıklı, Z. Synthesis and evaluation of new 1,3,4-thiadiazole derivatives as potent antifungal agents. Molecules 2018, 23, 3129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  17. Kaplancikli, Z.A. Synthesis of some oxadiazole derivatives as new anticandidal agents. Molecules 2011, 16, 7662–7671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. El-Gohary, N.S.; Shaaban, M.I. Synthesis, antimicrobial, antiquorum-sensing and antitumor activities of new benzimidazole analogs. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2017, 137, 439–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Karaca Gençer, H.; Acar Çevik, U.; Levent, S.; Sağlık, B.N.; Korkut, B.; Özkay, Y.; Ilgın, S.; Öztürk, Y. New Benzimidazole-1,2,4-Triazole Hybrid Compounds: Synthesis, Anticandidal Activity and Cytotoxicity Evaluation. Molecules 2017, 22, 507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  20. Yurttaş, L.; Duran, M.; Demirayak, Ş.; Gençer, H.K.; Tunali, Y. Synthesis and initial biological evaluation of substituted 1-phenylamino-2-thio-4,5-dimethyl-1H-imidazole derivatives. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2013, 23, 6764–6768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Łukowska-Chojnacka, E.; Kowalkowska, A.; Napiórkowska, A. Lipase-catalyzed kinetic resolution of novel antitubercular benzoxazole derivatives. Chirality 2018, 30, 457–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zeynizadeh, B.; Setamdideh, D. NaBH4/charcoal: A new synthetic method for mild and convenient reduction of nitroarenes. Synth. Commun. 2006, 36, 2699–2704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yamada, N.; Mizuochi, M.; Takeda, M.; Kawaguchi, H.; Morita, H. A facile and efficient one-pot synthesis of thiirans by the reaction of benzoxazolyl β-ketosulfides with NaBH4/NaOH. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008, 49, 1166–1168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Loghmani-Khouzani, H.; Hajiheidari, D. Synthesis of difluorinated β-ketosulfones and novel gem-difluoromethylsulfone-containing heterocycles as fluorinated building blocks. J. Fluor. Chem. 2010, 131, 561–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Varun, B.V.; Gadde, K.; Prabhu, K.R. Synthesis of α-sulfenyl monoketones: Via a metal-free oxidative cross dehydrogenative coupling (CDC) reaction. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2016, 14, 7665–7670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yang, Z.; Li, J.; Hua, J.; Yang, T.; Yi, J.; Zhou, C. KI/K2S2O8-Mediated α-C-H Sulfenylation of Carbonyl Compounds with (Hetero)Aryl Thiols. Synlett 2017, 28, 2325–2329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Md. Khaja Mohinuddin, P.; Gangi Reddy, N.C. Zinc oxide catalyzed solvent-free mechanochemical route for C-S bond construction: A sustainable process. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2017, 2017, 1207–1214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Reference Method for Broth Dilution Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Yeasts, 3rd ed.; Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Wayne, PA, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  29. Menezes, C.; Valerio, E.; Dias, E. The Kidney Vero-E6 Cell Line: A Suitable Model to Study the Toxicity of Microcystins. N. Insights Toxic. Drug Test. 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  30. Abdi Goushbolagh, N.; Farhood, B.; Astani, A.; Nikfarjam, A.; Kalantari, M.; Zare, M.H. Quantitative Cytotoxicity, Cellular Uptake and Radioprotection Effect of Cerium Oxide Nanoparticles in MRC-5 Normal Cells and MCF-7 Cancerous Cells. BioNanoScience 2018, 8, 769–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Staniszewska, M.; Sobiepanek, A.; Małgorzata, G.; Peña-Cabrera, E.; Arroyo-Córdoba, I.J.; Michalina, K.; Kuryk, Ł.; Wieczorek, M.; Koronkiewicz, M.; Kobiela, T.; et al. Sulfone derivatives enter the cytoplasm of Candida albicans sessile cells. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2020, 191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Te Dorsthorst, D.T.A.; Verweij, P.E.; Meis, J.F.G.M.; Punt, N.C.; Mouton, J.W. Comparison of fractional inhibitory concentration index with response surface modeling for characterization of in vitro interaction of antifungals against itraconazole-susceptible and -resistant Aspergillus fumigatus isolates. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2002, 46, 702–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  33. Whaley, S.G.; Berkow, E.L.; Rybak, J.M.; Nishimoto, A.T.; Barker, K.S.; Rogers, P.D. Azole antifungal resistance in Candida albicans and emerging non-albicans Candida Species. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 7, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  34. Al-Harthy, T.; Zoghaib, W.; Abdel-Jalil, R. Importance of fluorine in benzazole compounds. Molecules 2020, 25, 4677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Arthington-Skaggs, B.A.; Lee-Yang, W.; Ciblak, M.A.; Frade, J.P.; Brandt, M.E.; Hajjeh, R.A.; Harrison, L.H.; Sofair, A.N.; Warnock, D.W. Comparison of visual and spectrophotometric methods of broth microdilution MIC end point determination and evaluation of a sterol quantitation method for in vitro susceptibility testing of fluconazole and itraconazole against trailing and nontrailing Cand. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2002, 46, 2477–2481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  36. Suchodolski, J.; Muraszko, J.; Bernat, P.; Krasowska, A. A crucial role for ergosterol in plasma membrane composition, localisation, and activity of Cdr1p and H+-ATPase in Candida albicans. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  37. Li, H.; Gong, H.; Qi, Y.; Li, J.; Ji, X.; Sun, J.; Tian, R.; Bao, H.; Song, X.; Chen, Q.; et al. In vitro and in vivo antifungal activities and mechanism of heteropolytungstates against Candida species. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  38. Yumoto, R.; Murakami, T.; Sanemasa, M.; Nasu, R.; Nagai, J.; Takano, M. Pharmacokinetic interaction of cytochrome P450 3A-related compounds with rhodamine 123, a P-glycoprotein substrate, in rats pretreated with dexamethasone. Drug Metab. Dispos. 2001, 29, 145–151. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  39. Forster, S.; Thumser, A.E.; Hood, S.R.; Plant, N. Characterization of rhodamine-123 as a tracer dye for use in in vitro drug transport assays. PLoS ONE 2012, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  40. Ramsdale, M. Programmed cell death in pathogenic fungi. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Res. 2008, 1783, 1369–1380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  41. François, I.E.J.A.; Cammue, B.P.A.; Borgers, M.; Ausma, J.; Dispersyn, G.D.; Thevissen, K. Azoles: Mode of antifungal action and resistance development. Effect of miconazole on endogenous reactive oxygen species production in Candida albicans. Anti-Infect. Agents Med. Chem. 2006, 5, 3–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Maurya, I.K.; Thota, C.K.; Sharma, J.; Tupe, S.G.; Chaudhary, P.; Singh, M.K.; Thakur, I.S.; Deshpande, M.; Prasad, R.; Chauhan, V.S. Mechanism of action of novel synthetic dodecapeptides against Candida albicans. Biochim. Biophys. Acta-Gen. Subj. 2013, 1830, 5193–5203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Te Welscher, Y.M.; Ten Napel, H.H.; Balagué, M.M.; Souza, C.M.; Riezman, H.; De Kruijff, B.; Breukink, E. Natamycin blocks fungal growth by binding specifically to ergosterol without permeabilizing the membrane. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283, 6393–6401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  44. Escalante, A.; Gattuso, M.; Pérez, P.; Zacchino, S. Evidence for the mechanism of action of the antifungal phytolaccoside B isolated from Phytolacca tetramera Hauman. J. Nat. Prod. 2008, 71, 1720–1725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Virág, E.; Pesti, M.; Kunsági-Máté, S. Complex formation between primycin and ergosterol: Entropy–driven initiation of modification of the fungal plasma membrane structure. J. Antibiot. 2012, 65, 193–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  46. Staniszewska, M.; Bondaryk, M.; Wieczorek, M.; Estrada-Mata, E.; Mora-Montes, H.M.; Ochal, Z. Antifungal effect of novel 2-bromo-2-chloro-2-(4-chlorophenylsulfonyl)-1-phenylethanone against Candida Strains. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  47. Promega CellTiter 96 AQueous One Solution Cell Proliferation Assay. Available online: http://www.promega.com (accessed on 14 June 2021).
  48. Thermofisher Scientific CyQUANTTM MTT Cell Proliferation Assay Kit. Available online: http://www.thermofisher.com (accessed on 14 June 2021).
  49. Singh, S.; Fatima, Z.; Hameed, S. Octyl gallate reduces ABC multidrug transporter CaCdr1p expression and leads to its mislocalisation in azole-resistant clinical isolates of Candida albicans. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2020, 22, 497–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Tian, J.; Ban, X.; Zeng, H.; He, J.; Chen, Y.; Wang, Y. The mechanism of antifungal action of essential oil from dill (Anethum graveolens l.) on Aspergillus flavus. PLoS ONE 2012, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  51. Borowiecki, P.; Wińska, P.; Bretner, M.; Gizińska, M.; Koronkiewicz, M.; Staniszewska, M. Synthesis of novel proxyphylline derivatives with dual Anti-Candida albicans and anticancer activity. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2018, 150, 307–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Invitrogen FITC Annexin V/Dead Cell Apoptosis Kit with FITC annexin V and PI, for Flow Cytometry. Available online: http://www.thermofisher.com (accessed on 14 June 2021).
  53. Gbelska, Y.; Toth Hervay, N.; Dzugasova, V.; Konecna, A. Measurement of Energy-dependent Rhodamine 6G Efflux in Yeast Species. Bio Protoc. 2017, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  54. Zielinska, P.; Staniszewska, M.; Bondaryk, M.; Koronkiewicz, M.; Urbanczyk-Lipkowska, Z. Design and studies of multiple mechanism of anti-Candida activity of a new potent Trp-rich peptide dendrimers. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2015, 105, 106–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Leite, M.C.A.; De Brito Bezerra, A.P.; De Sousa, J.P.; Guerra, F.Q.S.; De Oliveira Lima, E. Evaluation of antifungal activity and mechanism of action of citral against Candida albicans. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2014, 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  56. Vale-Silva, L.; Ischer, F.; Leibundgut-Landmann, S.; Sanglard, D. Gain-of-function mutations in PDR1, a regulator of antifungal drug resistance in candida glabrata, control adherence to host cells. Infect. Immun. 2013, 81, 1709–1720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
Molecules 26 05008 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Synthesis of ketones 5–7 by S-alkylation of 2-mercaptobenzokxazoles 1–3.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of ketones 5–7 by S-alkylation of 2-mercaptobenzokxazoles 1–3.
Molecules 26 05008 sch001
Molecules 26 05008 sch002 550
Scheme 2. Synthesis of alcohols 8 by reduction in ketones 5–7.
Scheme 2. Synthesis of alcohols 8 by reduction in ketones 5–7.
Molecules 26 05008 sch002
Molecules 26 05008 g001 550
Figure 1. Accidental cell death of C. albicans generated by benzoxazoles. Legend: PI means propidium iodide, PI intercalating strategy to characterize accidental cell death (ACD), % PI-Positivity means % cell death assessed during automated readout using flow cytometry BD FACSLyric 2L6C (BD Biosciences. USA).
Figure 1. Accidental cell death of C. albicans generated by benzoxazoles. Legend: PI means propidium iodide, PI intercalating strategy to characterize accidental cell death (ACD), % PI-Positivity means % cell death assessed during automated readout using flow cytometry BD FACSLyric 2L6C (BD Biosciences. USA).
Molecules 26 05008 g001
Molecules 26 05008 g002 550
Figure 2. Benzoxazoles’ influence on the passive efflux of Rho123. Legend: Rhodamine (Rho123) content as a relative difference between the control and test (%) in the post-culture medium of the C. albicans SC5314 treated with compounds 5a, 5e, 5j, 8c, 8h, 8i and 13d at different concentrations. %C = (A(test) − A(control))/A(control) × 100, where A (control) = 3901. The C. albicans cells were incubated with Rho123 at 20 mM for 10 min and the Rho123 extracellular conc. was determined against a standard curve following the cell lysis with Triton 6100. Standard curve: A = 1155.9 C + 3901 → C = A − 3901 1155.9 . Data mean the average of three separate repeats S.D.
Figure 2. Benzoxazoles’ influence on the passive efflux of Rho123. Legend: Rhodamine (Rho123) content as a relative difference between the control and test (%) in the post-culture medium of the C. albicans SC5314 treated with compounds 5a, 5e, 5j, 8c, 8h, 8i and 13d at different concentrations. %C = (A(test) − A(control))/A(control) × 100, where A (control) = 3901. The C. albicans cells were incubated with Rho123 at 20 mM for 10 min and the Rho123 extracellular conc. was determined against a standard curve following the cell lysis with Triton 6100. Standard curve: A = 1155.9 C + 3901 → C = A − 3901 1155.9 . Data mean the average of three separate repeats S.D.
Molecules 26 05008 g002
Molecules 26 05008 g003 550
Figure 3. The interaction between benzoxazoles and exogenous ergosterols. Legend: Absorbance at 400nm after 96 h incubation of the C. albicans SC5314 cells in YEPD containing different concentrations of benzoxazoles and exogenous ergosterol. The mean % of absorbance of the growth control is presented as GCW. ITR means Itraconazole. The assay was performed in triplicate. Values are presented as means ± SD.
Figure 3. The interaction between benzoxazoles and exogenous ergosterols. Legend: Absorbance at 400nm after 96 h incubation of the C. albicans SC5314 cells in YEPD containing different concentrations of benzoxazoles and exogenous ergosterol. The mean % of absorbance of the growth control is presented as GCW. ITR means Itraconazole. The assay was performed in triplicate. Values are presented as means ± SD.
Molecules 26 05008 g003
Table
Table 2. Antifungal activity of benzoxazole derivatives against C. albicans ATCC SC5314.
Table 2. Antifungal activity of benzoxazole derivatives against C. albicans ATCC SC5314.
Comp. Conc. (μg/mL)
1684210.5
5a11.7 ± 3.810.0 ± 2.310.4 ± 4.78.8 ± 2.48.1 ± 0.67.8 ± 1.1
5b99.3 ± 4.386.9 ± 10.680.3 ± 13.482.9 ± 1.572.0 ± 21.968.7 ± 16.8
5c96.4 ± 0.685.3 ± 16.685.7 ± 16.679.9 ± 7.379.4 ± 4.357.6 ± 16.4
5d100.3 ± 3.2 **96.4 ± 2.696.1 ± 6.676.5 ± 10.074.9 ± 9.571.0 ± 15.0
5e27.7 ± 3.310.9 ± 2.910.9 ± 3.510.0 ± 2.59.3 ± 3.17.2 ± 0.1
5f93.1 ± 8.8 *87.6 ± 2.287.9 ± 11.382.1 ± 2.680.0 ± 1.368.2 ± 20.3
5g73.8 ± 0.472.9 ± 0.670.9 ± 2.671.8 ± 5.169.4 ± 0.668.8 ± 0.6
5h98.55 ± 0.26 98.52 ± 0.2099.27 ± 0.0798.99 ± 0.1598.98 ± 0.1498.33 ± 0.26
5i78.7 ± 2.175.6 ± 1.673.3 ± 2.773.6 ± 3.573.3 ± 20.266.3 ± 10.9
5j17.6 ± 0.812.5 ± 3.69.1 ± 0.68.0 ± 0.28.1 ± 0.58.2 ± 0.5
5k76.6 ± 1.2 *74.5 ± 1.773.5 ± 0.872.5 ± 27.070.0 ± 14.365.8 ± 10.2
6a79.7 ± 3.1 *74.9 ± 1.274.9 ± 2.472.8 ± 15.270.6 ± 8.070.7 ± 0.2
6b60.9 ± 12.945.0 ± 8.341.3 ± 9.730.8 ± 7.25.0 ± 1.12.0 ± 1.1
7a79.5 ± 12.5 *45.0 ± 16.144.2 ± 8.242.0 ± 20.125.2 ± 4.017.7 ± 3.1
7b65.3 ± 21.839.7 ± 9.322.3 ± 4.331.6 ± 17.618.6 ± 0.25.0 ± 1.1
8b98.32 ± 0.23 98.47 ± 0.2198.18 ± 0.2798.84 ± 0.1898.55 ± 0.2398.59 ± 0.16
8c8.7 ± 1.98.8 ± 1.98.4 ± 1.17.5 ± 0.57.4 ± 0.56.9 ± 0.0
8d7.0 ± 1.56.5 ± 0.66.3 ± 0.16.4 ± 0.16.5 ± 0.06.4 ± 0.0
8e98.53 ± 0.12 99.43 ± 0.0799.32 ± 0.0698.78 ± 0.1099.17 ± 0.0899.24 ± 0.10
8f7.6 ± 1.36.8 ± 0.36.6 ± 0.06.9 ± 0.26.8 ± 0.26.6 ± 0.0
8h14.1 ± 3.98.1 ± 0.28.8 ± 0.98.7 ± 0.58.1 ± 0.17.8 ± 0.1
8i10.9 ± 4.78.9 ± 1.97.1 ± 0.17.1 ± 0.16.8 ± 0.06.9 ± 0.1
8j98.29 ± 0.02 99.28 ± 0.1698.79 ± 0.1298.38 ± 0.2298.40 ± 0.0498.41 ± 0.20
Legend: Visual and spectrophotometric reading after 48 h of incubation: % of growth inhibition at 405 nm; * partial MICP; ** total MICT were determined according to the CLSI method [28].
Table
Table 3. Antifungal activity of 5d, 5i, 5k and 6a against the fungal isolates.
Table 3. Antifungal activity of 5d, 5i, 5k and 6a against the fungal isolates.
Candida IsolateComp. (μg/mL)% Cell Growth Inhibition (Mean ± SD)
1684210.5
C. albicans5d52.0 ± 15.7 44.1 ± 9.140.6 ± 14.921.4 ± 4.420.4 ± 10.316.0 ± 3.3
5i55.7 ± 13.142.0 ± 12.222.9 ± 12.210.5 ± 2.96.5 ± 2.94.6 ± 1.2
5k64.2 ± 10.6 *56.5 ± 16.244.4 ± 14.340.0 ± 14.61.7 ± 0.41.0 ± 0.4
6a88.0 ± 9.7 *69.4 ± 6.548.0 ± 6.627.9 ± 4.326.5 ± 9.3 6.9 ± 3.0
C. glabrata5d38.3 ± 3.826.2 ± 4.616.6 ± 4.210.1 ± 2.114.5 ± 1.09.2 ± 0.8
5i53.0 ± 3.534.4 ± 3.014.4 ± 2.813.2 ± 1.411.6 ± 2.17.5 ± 1.4
5k35.0 ± 5.119.1 ± 1.725.5 ± 2.526.5 ± 3.43.5 ± 0.512.3 ± 1.4
6a27.0 ± 6.123.6 ± 3.310.4 ± 1.37.0 ± 0.53.0 ± 0.51.0 ± 0.5
Legend: C. albicans (fluconazole- and itraconazole-resistant) and C. glabrata were isolated from patients with candidiasis; visual and spectrophotometric reading at 405 nm after 48 h incubation: * partial MIC in line with CLSI [28].
Table
Table 4. Cytotoxicity (mean% ± SD) of benzoxazoles against the mammalian cell line.
Table 4. Cytotoxicity (mean% ± SD) of benzoxazoles against the mammalian cell line.
Cell Line ATCCComp. [µg/mL]% Cytotoxicity (Mean ± SD)
5122561286432168421
Kidney Vero E65d-61.3 ± 1.018.4 ± 0.417.0 ± 1.08.7 ± 0.26.1 ± 0.34.4 ± 0.23.6 ± 0.23.4 ± 0.12.1 ± 0.1
6a-60.2 ± 3.317.2 ± 0.410.1 ± 0.55.4 ± 0.35.0 ± 0.22.9 ± 0.10.1 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.0
7a-63.8 ± 8.714.4 ± 0.59.1 ± 0.75.4 ± 0.44.2 ± 0.11.6 ± 0.11.4 ± 0.10.9 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.0
Pulmonary Fibroblasts MRC-55a40.64 ± 3.039.03 ± 3.238.92 ± 5.538.69 ± 2.338.25 ± 3.236.67 ± 3.036.71 ± 4.136.15 ± 2.733.19 ± 1.632.59 ± 0.8
5e13.98 ± 0.712.33 ± 0.49.97 ± 0.69.56 ± 0.49.22 ± 0.58.44 ± 0.48.10 ± 0.53.38 ± 0.22.59 ± 0.22.59 ± 0.2
5j50.75 ± 0.046.22 ± 0.045.02 ± 0.044.01 ± 0.040.19 ± 0.139.56 ± 0.038.92 ± 0.137.72 ± 0.035.81 ± 0.034.46 ± 0.0
8c77.98 ± 0.081.91 ± 0.184.35 ± 0.08.92 ± 0.01.69 ± 0.07.42 ± 0.04.99 ± 0.00.65 ± 0.014.32 ± 0.020.04 ± 0.0
8d63.26 ± 0.383.54 ± 0.083.99 ± 0.022.09 ± 0.015.46 ± 0.013.21 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.012.37 ± 0.03.60 ± 0.06.75 ± 0.0
8h81.13 ± 0.081.41 ± 0.181.97 ± 0.06.13 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.01.98 ± 0.01.86 ± 0.013.21 ± 0.07.82 ± 0.013.32 ± 0.0
8i71.24 ± 0.283.86 ± 0.283.00 ± 0.061.65 ± 0.617.65 ± 0.09.71 ± 0.011.51 ± 0.015.25 ± 0.011.39 ± 0.014.61 ± 0.0
Legend: OD at 495 nm and 660 nm as the reference wavelength (Spark Control M10, Tecan Group, Austria; Synergy H4 Hybrid Reader, BioTek Instruments, USA). Specific absorbance (SA): SA = A490/495 − A660. % cytotoxicity = (SA Positive control − SA Test)/(SA Positive control − SA Blank) × 100. Positive control means MCR-5 or Vero E6 monolayer in EMEM and Blank: EMEM with the tested conc. of benzoxazoles [31].
Table
Table 5. UV spectrometric ergosterol content (%) in the benzoxazole-treated C. albicans.
Table 5. UV spectrometric ergosterol content (%) in the benzoxazole-treated C. albicans.
Candida albicansErgosterol Content (% ± SD) *
Comp. (µg/mL)5d6a7a
ATCC SC53141673.8 ± 3.293.9 ± 4.395.5 ± 3.7
479.8 ± 3.257.3 ± 1.684.2 ± 3.8
Clinical isolate1674.3 ± 3.583.4 ± 4.199.9 ± 5.0
457.8 ± 2.766.1 ± 4.368.0 ± 2.0
Legend: The data are compared to the untreated control. * Percentage of the cell pellet wet weight (mean ± SD). C. albicans (fluconazole- and itraconazole-resistant).
Table
Table 6. Ergosterol quantification in the benzoxazole-treated C. albicans using HPLC.
Table 6. Ergosterol quantification in the benzoxazole-treated C. albicans using HPLC.
Candida albicansComp. (µg/mL)Ergosterol Conc. (% ± SD)
5d6a7a
ATCC SC531416114.4 ± 9.265.9 ± 5.372.7 ± 5.8
478.0 ± 6.267.9 ± 5.463.2 ± 3.8
Clinical isolate1651.7 ± 4.133.1 ± 2.6112.4 ± 9.0
497.3 ± 7.852.6 ± 4.271.6 ± 5.7
Legend: Data are compared to the untreated control. HPLC analysis was performed using 200 Series Nelson NCI 900 system with UV/VIS detection at 282 nm (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA) and COSMOSIL C18-MS-II column (Nacalai tesque, Kyoto, Japan). Gradient elusion was performed starting with acetonitrile; methanol 97:3 v/v as the mobile phase. The C. albicans clinical isolate fluconazole- and itraconazole-resistant was used.
Table
Table 7. FIC indexes of 5d combined with AmB against C. glabrata.
Table 7. FIC indexes of 5d combined with AmB against C. glabrata.
Comp.MIC (µg/mL)Outcomes
AloneCombination
5d
AmB		4 *
1.25 **		16
2.5		No rules
2
1.25		Indifference
2
2.5
1
2.5
0.5
2.25
0.25
2.5
Legend: * partial inhibition: MICp; ** total inhibition: MICT. AmB means amphotericin B (stock conc.: 250 µg/mL), ΣFIC = C(5d)/MICP(5d) + C(AmB)/MICT(AmB); C means conc. of 5d or AmB in well containing combination of two compounds, resulting in 100% growth inhibition in the spectrophotometric (SPE) method at 405 nm. ΣFIC for 5d and AmB against C. glabrata and incubation time of 96 h. Interactions were categorized according to the method of Te Dorsthorst et al. [32] by the following rules: synergism (FIC ≤ 0.5), additivity (FIC > 0.5 to ≤1) and indifference (FIC > 1 to <4).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Staniszewska, M.; Kuryk, Ł.; Gryciuk, A.; Kawalec, J.; Rogalska, M.; Baran, J.; Łukowska-Chojnacka, E.; Kowalkowska, A. In Vitro Anti-Candida Activity and Action Mode of Benzoxazole Derivatives. Molecules 2021, 26, 5008. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26165008

AMA Style

Staniszewska M, Kuryk Ł, Gryciuk A, Kawalec J, Rogalska M, Baran J, Łukowska-Chojnacka E, Kowalkowska A. In Vitro Anti-Candida Activity and Action Mode of Benzoxazole Derivatives. Molecules. 2021; 26(16):5008. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26165008

Chicago/Turabian Style

Staniszewska, Monika, Łukasz Kuryk, Aleksander Gryciuk, Joanna Kawalec, Marta Rogalska, Joanna Baran, Edyta Łukowska-Chojnacka, and Anna Kowalkowska. 2021. "In Vitro Anti-Candida Activity and Action Mode of Benzoxazole Derivatives" Molecules 26, no. 16: 5008. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26165008

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop