Next Article in Journal
BDNF as a Putative Target for Standardized Extract of Ginkgo biloba-Induced Persistence of Object Recognition Memory
Next Article in Special Issue
Redox State and Lysosomal Activity in Women with Ovarian Cancer with Tumor Recurrence and Multiorgan Metastasis
Previous Article in Journal
Comparison between the Test and Simulation Results for PLA Structures 3D Printed, Bending Stressed
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Impact of Olive Oil Compounds on the Metabolic Reprogramming of Cutaneous Melanoma Cell Models
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 26
Issue 11
10.3390/molecules26113327
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Design, Synthesis and In-Vitro Biological Evaluation of Antofine and Tylophorine Prodrugs as Hypoxia-Targeted Anticancer Agents

by
Ziad Omran
1,*,
Chris P. Guise
2,
Linwei Chen
3,
Cyril Rauch
4,
Ashraf N. Abdalla
5,
Omeima Abdullah
5,
Ikhlas A. Sindi
6,
Peter M. Fischer
7,
Jeff B. Smaill
2,
Adam V. Patterson
2,
Yuxiu Liu
3 and
Qingmin Wang
3
1
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Pharmacy Department, Batterjee Medical College, Jeddah 21442, Saudi Arabia
2
Auckland Cancer Society Research Centre, School of Medical Sciences, The University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland 1142, New Zealand
3
State Key Laboratory of Elemento-Organic Chemistry, Research Institute of Elemento-Organic Chemistry, College of Chemistry, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China
4
School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, College Road, Sutton Bonington LE12 5RD, UK
5
College of Pharmacy, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah 21955, Saudi Arabia
6
Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
7
School of Pharmacy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2021, 26(11), 3327; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26113327
Submission received: 9 May 2021 / Revised: 20 May 2021 / Accepted: 29 May 2021 / Published: 1 June 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Therapies based on Cancer Metabolic Remodelling)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Phenanthroindolizidines, such as antofine and tylophorine, are a family of natural alkaloids isolated from different species of Asclepiadaceas. They are characterized by interesting biological activities, such as pronounced cytotoxicity against different human cancerous cell lines, including multidrug-resistant examples. Nonetheless, these derivatives are associated with severe neurotoxicity and loss of in vivo activity due to the highly lipophilic nature of the alkaloids. Here, we describe the development of highly polar prodrugs of antofine and tylophorine as hypoxia-targeted prodrugs. The developed quaternary ammonium salts of phenanthroindolizidines showed high chemical and metabolic stability and are predicted to have no penetration through the blood–brain barrier. The designed prodrugs displayed decreased cytotoxicity when tested under normoxic conditions. However, their cytotoxic activity considerably increased when tested under hypoxic conditions.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Cancer is a complex disease characterized by the loss of control of cell division. It is the second cause of mortality in the world after cardiovascular diseases. Chemotherapy has shown reasonable success in treating cancer; however, the lack of selectivity of chemotherapy drugs, which causes severe side effects, and the emergence of resistance are two major drawbacks preventing the effective clinical use of chemotherapeutic agents [1,2,3,4].
Natural products have been the major source of the currently available drugs. About 50% of the FDA-approved small molecule anticancer drugs introduced from the early 1940s to the end of 2014 were either natural products or directly derived from them [5]. One example is the phenanthroindolizidine family, a group of alkaloids with general structure (1) isolated from different species of Asclepiadaceas (Figure 1). These alkaloids display very interesting biological activities, such as pronounced cytotoxicity against different human cancerous cell lines. Prototype compounds, such as tylocrebrine, tylophorine, and antofine (Figure 1), exhibit low nanomolar to picomolar half-maximal growth inhibition (GI50) values, as well as effectiveness against multidrug-resistant human cancerous cell lines [6]. Phenanthroindolizidines exert their anticancer activity through a combination of diverse mechanisms [7] such as the inhibition of hypoxia-inducible factor-1 (HIF-1) [8], the inhibition of DNA, RNA and protein synthesis [9,10,11,12], the inhibition of thymidylate synthase [13,14,15], the inhibition of dihydrofolate reductase [13,14,15], the inhibition of Activator Protein-1, and NF-κB, and the down-regulation of cyclin D1 [16,17].
Notwithstanding their therapeutic potential, no compound in this class has yet successfully passed clinical trials. The main drawbacks are their severe central nervous system toxicity and a significant loss of anti-cancer activity when administered in vivo [18,19]. These drawbacks are attributed to the highly lipophilic nature of these alkaloids [6,19] that enables them to cross the blood–brain barrier (BBB) and to undergo high nonspecific protein binding and rapid metabolism.
One proposed solution has been the use of more polar analogues that cannot cross the BBB and therefore could have less toxic side effects [19]. Nonetheless, efforts to increase the polarity of this type of alkaloid (e.g., by opening the indolizidine ring or introducing hydroxyl groups on the E ring) have led to significant losses of cytotoxicity [20,21].
The aim of the present work was to develop polar prodrugs of phenanthroindolizidine alkaloids. The rationale was that the polarity of the new derivatives would prevent them from penetrating the BBB, thereby attenuating their neurotoxicity. The prodrugs were designed to be activated only within the cancerous microenvironment by targeting the unique biochemical alterations in cancer cells, i.e., the low concentrations of molecular oxygen (hypoxia). This, in turn, would further increase the selectivity of the proposed molecules.
Hypoxia, or oxygen deficiency, is a common feature of most solid tumors and is considered a negative prognostic factor [22]. Hypoxia results from the disorganized tumor vasculature, where the intercapillary distances usually exceed the oxygen diffusion range (around 200 μm) [23]. Hypoxia is responsible, at least in part, for tumor resistance to radio- and chemotherapy [24]. Additionally, hypoxia induces metastasis [25], promotes angiogenesis and vasculogenesis [26,27], and enhances invasiveness [28]. Given the important role of hypoxia in tumor development and progression, and given its relative absence in healthy tissues [29], hypoxia represents an attractive therapeutic target [22,30,31,32]. The main approach to targeting hypoxia consists of the development of bioreductive prodrugs that can be activated in hypoxic tissues by enzymatic reduction [33,34,35,36]. Designing drug delivery systems targeting tumor-hypoxia is another promising approach [37,38,39].
Nitro(hetero)cylic derivatives are now well established as prodrugs that can be activated by reductive metabolism mediated by the oxidoreductase enzymes present in human cells [40]. This reduction is repressed by molecular oxygen, making this type of prodrug specific to the hypoxic tumor microenvironment [40]. Some of these prodrugs, such as PR-104 and evofosfamide, also known as TH-302, (Figure 2), have reached Phase II and III clinical trials, either as monotherapy or in combination therapy to treat various types of solid tumors [33,40,41,42]. The permanent positive charge of the tarloxotinib bromide (Figure 2) renders the molecule less permeable to cells than the parent drug, thereby decreasing the toxicity. This attenuation of toxicity permits the administration of such type of quaternary ammonium prodrugs at higher doses than can be achieved with the parent drugs. Additionally, the relative positioning of positive charge and lipophilic head group of this prodrug class leads to sustained tumor residence over time [43]. Tarloxotinib bromide is currently in phase II clinical trials to treat non-small cell lung cancer with HER2 activating mutations [44].
During this work, we successfully applied the approach employed to synthesize tarloxotinib bromide to develop quaternary ammonium salts of antofine and tylophorine alkaloids as hypoxia-targeted prodrugs.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Chemistry

Both enantiomers of tylophorine and (R)-antofine were obtained as previously described [45] with slight modification (Figure 3). Briefly, dibromides 2 were alkylated by the corresponding N,N-diethylpyrrolidine-2-carboxamide. Amides 3 were then treated with nBuLi and TMEDA, followed by sodium borohydride, to yield alcohols 4, which were finally reduced using triethylsilane and trifluoroacetic acid to give the desired alkaloids. The target quaternary ammonium salts 5a–c were successfully synthesized by reacting appropriate precursor alkaloids with 5-(bromomethyl)-1-methyl-4-nitro-1H-imidazole [43,46]. The prodrugs 5a–c obtained with reasonable yields (52–68%) after purification by silica gel.

2.2. Physicochemical Properties

The physicochemical properties of the new compounds were evaluated (Table 1). The water solubility of the alkaloids was considerably increased, up to 80-fold, when they were transformed to their corresponding quaternary ammonium salts 5a–b. Consequently, these derivatives lost their BBB penetrability, as predicted by the BBB-Parallel Artificial Membrane Permeability Assay (BBB-PAMPA), whereas their parent alkaloids had free passage through the BBB. Additionally, the developed salts had significantly less affinity for plasma proteins than did their parent alkaloids.
The chemical and metabolic stability of quaternary ammonium salts was also evaluated to ensure that our prodrugs would not be transformed into the parent alkaloids before arriving at their site of action, the hypoxic tumor. The developed prodrugs displayed high plasma stability when incubated with either mouse or human plasma (Figure 4A,B), attested by t1/2 values ranging between 63 and 145 h, Table 2. Interestingly, after 24 h of incubation in either mouse or human plasma, no more than 1% of compounds 5a or 5b were transformed into their parent drugs.
Similarly, consistent with their reduced lipophilicity the developed quaternary ammonium salts showed significantly higher metabolic stability than was observed for their parent alkaloids following incubation with mouse liver microsomes (Figure 5). The alkaloid half-lives were increased by three- to four-fold upon their transformation to the corresponding ammonium salts (Table 3). It is also noteworthy that less than 1% of compounds 5a or 5b was metabolized into the parent drug under these conditions.

2.3. Cytotoxic Activity

The cytotoxicity of the compounds 5a–c and their parent alkaloids was evaluated by the 3-[4,5-dimethylthiazole-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay against 5 cancerous and 2 non-cancerous cell lines (Table 4). All three quaternary ammonium salts 5a–c showed significantly decreased cytotoxicity (up to 1000-fold) against cancerous and noncancerous cell lines alike under normoxic conditions when compared with the parent drugs.
We also checked if the designed prodrugs were able to liberate the active alkaloids in hypoxic tumors by testing them under hypoxic conditions using an anaerobic chamber. The three prodrugs 5a–c and their parent alkaloids as well as the reference compounds PR-104A, the parent alcohol form of the phosphate pre-prodrug PR-104, and evofosfamide were tested using the HCT116 and H460 cell lines under both normoxic and hypoxic conditions (Table 5). The prodrugs were much less cytotoxic than the parent drugs, in agreement with our observations using the other cell lines described above (Figure 6).
The extent to which a prodrug is deactivated relative to its parent drug under normoxic conditions is defined as the Deactivation Ratio (DR). The DR can be simply calculated as DR = IC50 (prodrug)/IC50 (parent drug). The developed prodrugs 5a–c displayed excellent DRs ranging between 128 and 719. When tested under hypoxic conditions, the parent antofine and tylophorine drugs showed similar cytotoxicities to those seen under normoxic conditions. By contrast, prodrugs 5a–c showed significantly higher cytotoxicity under hypoxia than under normoxia (Table 4).
The efficacy of prodrug activation under hypoxic conditions can be expressed by the Hypoxia Cytotoxicity Ratio (HCR), which can be calculated for a given prodrug as: HCR = normoxic IC50/hypoxic IC50. Prodrugs 5a–c displayed interesting HCRs ranging between 1.5 and 26, thereby confirming the selectivity of these new derivatives for hypoxic tumors (Table 5).

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Chemistry

(13aR)-2,3,6-trimethoxy-10-((1-methyl-4-nitro-1H-imidazol-5-yl)methyl)-10,11,12,13,13a,14-hexahydro-9H-dibenzo[f,h]pyrrolo[1,2-b]isoquinolin-10-ium bromide (5a). To a solution of (R)-antofine (0.17 g, 0.48 mmol) in CHCl3 (30 mL) was added 5-(bromomethyl)-1-methyl-4-nitro-1H-imidazole (0.16 g, 0.73 mmol), and the reaction mixture was heated at reflux for 20 h under an atmosphere of argon. After the mixture was evaporated under vacuum, the residue was purified by column chromatography on silica gel (CH2Cl2:CH3OH = 10:1) to give the quaternary ammonium salt as a yellow solid (yield 52%). Mp:177–179 °C; purity: >99%; 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.24 (s, 2H), 8.14 (s, 1H), 7.87 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 1H), 7.53 (s, 1H), 7.33 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 1H), 5.21 (s, 2H), 5.01 (d, J = 17.1 Hz, 1H), 4.87–4.70 (m, 2H), 4.12 (s, 3H), 4.08 (s, 3H), 4.06 (s, 3H), 3.90–3.45 (m, 7H), 2.50–2.37 (m, 1H), 2.32–2.20 (m, 2H), 1.98–1.80 (m, 1H); 13C-NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 158.0, 149.7, 149.3, 147.4, 139.8 (2C), 130.5, 124.9, 124.5, 123.9, 122.1, 120.7, 118.3, 115.8, 105.1, 104.8, 104.6, 67.9, 62.6, 56.0, 55.6, 51.5, 50.7, 33.3, 26.8, 24.0, 18.5. HRMS (ESI) calcd for C29H33N3O5 (M-Br)+ 503.2415, found 503.2301. The spectra are joined in the Supplementary Materials.
(13aS)-2,3,6,7-tetramethoxy-10-((1-methyl-4-nitro-1H-imidazol-5-yl)methyl)-10,11,12,13,13a,14-hexahydro-9H-dibenzo[f,h]pyrrolo[1,2-b]isoquinolin-10-ium bromide (5b). The synthetic procedure was similar to that of compound 5a. Compound 5b was obtained as yellow solid (0.17 g, 58%). Mp:165–167 °C; purity: >99%;1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.11 (s, 1H), 8.10 (s, 1H), 8.07 (s, 1H), 7.45 (s, 1H), 7.21 (s, 1H), 5.13 (s, 2H), 4.99 (d, J = 17.5 Hz, 1H), 4.76–4.66 (m, 2H), 4.07 (s, 3H), 4.06 (s, 3H), 3.99 (s, 3H), 3.96–3.85 (m, 5H), 3.81–3.69 (m, 2H), 3.69–3.49 (m, 2H), 2.46–2.15 (m, 3H), 1.94–1.80 (m, 1H).13C-NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 149.9, 149.5, 149.4, 149.3, 147.9, 140.2, 124.5, 124.2, 124.1, 122.9, 121.2, 105.0, 104.93, 104.85, 104.4, 68.2, 63.1, 56.51, 56.48, 56.4, 56.1, 51.9, 51.0, 31.2, 27.2, 24.5, 18.8. HRMS (ESI) calcd for C30H35N3O6 (M-Br)+ 533.2520, found 533.2403.
(13aR)-2,3,6,7-tetramethoxy-10-((1-methyl-4-nitro-1H-imidazol-5-yl)methyl)-10,11,12,13,13a,14-hexahydro-9H-dibenzo[f,h]pyrrolo[1,2-b]isoquinolin-10-ium bromide (5c). The synthetic procedure was similar to that of compound 5a. Compound 5c was obtained as yellow solid (yield 55%). Mp:185-187 °C; purity: >99%;1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.11 (s, 1H), 8.10 (s, 1H), 8.08 (s, 1H), 7.45 (s, 1H), 7.20 (s, 1H), 5.13 (s, 2H), 4.98 (d, J = 17.4 Hz, 1H), 4.80–4.62 (m, 2H), 4.07 (s, 6H), 4.00 (s, 3H), 3.96–3.84 (m, 5H), 3.82–3.68 (m, 2H), 3.67–3.42 (m, 2H), 2.46–2.14 (m, 3H), 1.94–1.81 (m, 1H).13C-NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 149.9, 149.5, 149.4, 149.3, 147.9, 140.2, 124.5, 124.2, 124.1, 122.9, 121.2, 117.9, 104.92, 104.90, 104.8, 104.4, 68.2, 63.1, 56.50, 56.45, 56.4, 56.0, 51.8, 50.9, 49.1, 27.2, 24.4, 18.8. HRMS (ESI) calcd for C30H35N3O6 (M-Br)+ 533.2520, found 533.2400.

3.2. Physiochemical Properties

Water solubility, logD, and PAMPA-BBB were evaluated using the protocols we previously described [47].

3.3. Mouse/Human Plasma Stability Test

Incubations were carried out in 6 aliquots of 70 μL each in duplicates. The test compounds (1 μM, final DMSO concentration 0.5%) were incubated at 37 °C with shaking at 100 rpm. Six time points over 24 h (0, 3, 6, 9, 12 and 24 h) have been analyzed. The reactions were stopped by adding 350 μL of acetonitrile with subsequent plasma proteins sedimentation by centrifuging at 5500 rpm for 5 min. Supernatants were analyzed by LC-MS using Shimadzu VP HPLC system including vacuum degasser, gradient pumps, reverse phase column, column oven and autosampler. The HPLC system was coupled with tandem mass spectrometer API 3000 (PE Sciex, Foster City, CA, USA). Both the positive and negative ion modes of the TurboIonSpray ion source were used. The acquisition and analysis of the data were performed using Analyst 1.5.2 software (PE Sciex, API 3000 mass spectrometer, Foster City, CA, USA). The percentage of the test compounds remaining after incubation in plasma and their half-lives (T1/2) were calculated.

3.4. Mouse Microsomal Liver Stability Assay

Mouse hepatic microsomes were isolated from pooled, perfused livers of Balb/c male mice according to the standard protocol [48]. The batch of microsomes was tested for quality control using imipramine and propranolol as reference compounds. Microsomal incubations were carried out in 96-well plates in 5 aliquots of 40 μL each. Liver microsomal incubation medium contained PBS (100 mM, pH 7.4), MgCl2 (3.3 mM), NADPH (3 mM), glucose- 6-phosphate (5.3 mM), glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (0.67 units/mL) with 0.42 mg of liver microsomal protein per ml. Control incubations were performed by replacing the NADPH-cofactor system with PBS. The additional control incubations in PBS (with 3.3 mM MgCl2) without added microsomes were carried out in this study. Test compound (2 μM, final solvent concentration 1.6%) was incubated with microsomes at 37 °C, shaking at 100 rpm. The incubations were performed in duplicates. Five time points over 40 min had been analyzed. The reactions were stopped by adding 12 volumes of 90% acetonitrile-water to incubation aliquots, followed by protein sedimentation by centrifuging at 5500 rpm for 3 min. The supernatants were analyzed using LC-MS as mentioned above.

3.5. Cytotoxicity Assay

The eight cell lines HEK293 (Human embryonic kidney 293), CHO-K1 (Chinese hamster ovary K1), MCF-7 cells (Human breast adenocarcinoma), HCT116 (human colorectal carcinoma), RKO (Human rectal carcinoma), SW480 (human colorectal carcinoma), H460 (Human lung cancer), and MRC5 (Normal human foetal lung fibroblast), were obtained from the ATCC. The cell lines were routinely grown in alpha minimum essential medium (α-MEM) containing 5% foetal calf serum (FCS). The appropriate number of cells (HCT116 = 400 cells/well, H460 cells = 600 cells/well) were seeded into 96-well plates under normoxic or hypoxic conditions. Cells were plated in 100 µL α-MEM containing 10% FCS, 10mM D-Glucose and 0.2mM 2′-deoxycytidine. After incubation for 2 h, the compounds were added at the appropriate concentration and incubated for further 4 h. The cells were then washed three times with drug-free α-MEM (containing 5% FCS and pen/strep). The plates were then incubated for 5 days under normoxic conditions. The cells were stained with sulphorhodamine B to measure total cells [49]. The IC50 was determined by interpolation as the compound concentration reducing staining to 50% of controls on the same plate [50].

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, we successfully developed 1-methyl-4-nitro-1H-imidazol-5-yl quaternary ammonium salts of phenanthroindolizidine alkaloids as polar hypoxia-selective prodrugs. These new derivatives showed no predicted BBB penetration. Thus, these novel prodrugs should be devoid of neurotoxicity, the main reason for the failure of their parent alkaloids in clinical trials. The developed polar prodrugs 5a–c showed high chemical and metabolic stability and displayed decreased cytotoxicity when tested under normoxic conditions. However, their cytotoxic activity considerably increased when tested under hypoxic conditions. These new derivatives represent promising lead compounds that can be considered for further preclinical evaluation.

Supplementary Materials

Spectroscopic data (1H-NMR, 13C-NMR and HRMS) for compounds 5a–c are available online.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.O.; methodology, Y.L., Q.W. and O.A.; validation, C.R., P.M.F., J.B.S. and A.V.P.; formal analysis, I.A.S.; data curation, C.P.G., L.C. and A.N.A.; writing—original draft preparation, Z.O. and J.B.S.; funding acquisition, Z.O. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support provided by King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology (KACST), Grant No. 13-MED2515-10, and Batterjee Medical College, Grant No. B-RES-2020-0028.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Ethics Review Board of the College of Pharmacy at Umm AlQura University, (protocol code UQU-COP-EA # 143915 and date: 15 October 2017).

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Guillemard, V.; Saragovi, H.U. Novel approaches for targeted cancer therapy. Curr. Cancer Drug Targets 2004, 4, 313–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Holohan, C.; Van Schaeybroeck, S.; Longley, D.B.; Johnston, P.G. Cancer drug resistance: An evolving paradigm. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2013, 13, 714–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Housman, G.; Byler, S.; Heerboth, S.; Lapinska, K.; Longacre, M.; Snyder, N.; Sarkar, S. Drug resistance in cancer: An overview. Cancers 2014, 6, 1769–1792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Omran, Z.; Rauch, C. Acid-mediated Lipinski’s second rule: Application to drug design and targeting in cancer. Eur. Biophys. J. 2014, 43, 199–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Newman, D.J.; Cragg, G.M. Natural Products as Sources of New Drugs from 1981 to 2014. J. Nat. Prod. 2016, 79, 629–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Chemler, S.R. Phenanthroindolizidines and Phenanthroquinolizidines: Promising Alkaloids for Anti-Cancer Therapy. Curr. Bioact. Compd. 2009, 5, 2–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Omran, Z.; Abdalla, A.N.; Ibrahim, M.M.; Hossain, M.A.; Alarja, M.; Chen, L.; Liu, Y.; Wang, Q. Boronic Analogues of (R)-6-O-Desmethylantofine as Anticancer Agents. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2019, 67, 1324–1327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chen, C.-Y.; Zhu, G.-Y.; Wang, J.-R.; Jiang, Z.-H. Phenanthroindolizidine alkaloids from Tylophora atrofolliculata with hypoxia-inducible factor-1 (HIF-1) inhibitory activity. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 79958–79967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bucher, K.; Skogerson, L. Cryptopleurine--an inhibitor of translocation. Biochemistry 1976, 15, 4755–4759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Huang, M.T.; Grollman, A.P. Mode of action of tylocrebrine: Effects on protein and nucleic acid synthesis. Mol. Pharmacol. 1972, 8, 538–550. [Google Scholar]
  11. Carrasco, L.; Fernandez-Puentes, C.; Vazquez, D. Antibiotics and compounds affecting tanslation by eukaryotic ribosomes. Specific enhancement of aminoacyl-tRNA binding by methylaxnthines. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 1976, 10, 97–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Liu, Y.; Qing, L.; Meng, C.; Shi, J.; Yang, Y.; Wang, Z.; Han, G.; Wang, Y.; Ding, J.; Meng, L.H.; et al. 6-OH-Phenanthroquinolizidine Alkaloid and Its Derivatives Exert Potent Anticancer Activity by Delaying S Phase Progression. J. Med. Chem. 2017, 60, 2764–2779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Narasimha Rao, K.; Bhattacharya, R.K.; Venkatachalam, S.R. Thymidylate synthase activity in leukocytes from patients with chronic myelocytic leukemia and acute lymphocytic leukemia and its inhibition by phenanthroindolizidine alkaloids pergularinine and tylophorinidine. Cancer Lett. 1998, 128, 183–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Rao, K.N.; Venkatachalam, S.R. Inhibition of dihydrofolate reductase and cell growth activity by the phenanthroindolizidine alkaloids pergularinine and tylophorinidine: The in vitro cytotoxicity of these plant alkaloids and their potential as antimicrobial and anticancer agents. Toxicol. Vitro Int. J. Publ. Assoc. BIBRA 2000, 14, 53–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Rao, K.N.; Bhattacharya, R.K.; Venkatachalam, S.R. Inhibition of thymidylate synthase and cell growth by the phenanthroindolizidine alkaloids pergularinine and tylophorinidine. Chem. Biol. Interact. 1997, 106, 201–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Shiah, H.S.; Gao, W.; Baker, D.C.; Cheng, Y.C. Inhibition of cell growth and nuclear factor-kappaB activity in pancreatic cancer cell lines by a tylophorine analogue, DCB-3503. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2006, 5, 2484–2493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Gao, W.L.; Bussom, S.; Grill, S.P.; Gullen, E.A.; Hu, Y.C.; Huang, X.S.; Zhong, S.B.; Kaczmarek, C.; Gutierrez, J.; Francis, S.; et al. Structure-activity studies of phenanthroindolizidine alkaloids as potential antitumor agents. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2007, 17, 4338–4342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Huang, Y.F.; Liao, C.K.; Lin, J.C.; Jow, G.M.; Wang, H.S.; Wu, J.C. Antofine-induced connexin43 gap junction disassembly in rat astrocytes involves protein kinase Cbeta. Neurotoxicology 2013, 35, 169–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Suffness, M.; Douros, J. Anticancer Agents Based on Batural Product Models; Cassady, J.M., Douros, J., Eds.; Academic Press: London, UK, 1980; pp. 465–487. [Google Scholar]
  20. Wei, L.Y.; Brossi, A.; Kendall, R.; Bastow, K.F.; Morris-Natschke, S.L.; Shi, Q.; Lee, K.H. Antitumor agents 251: Synthesis, cytotoxic evaluation, and structure-activity relationship studies of phenanthrene-based tylophorine derivatives (PBTs) as a new class of antitumor agents. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2006, 14, 6560–6569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Yang, X.; Shi, Q.; Lai, C.Y.; Chen, C.Y.; Ohkoshi, E.; Yang, S.C.; Wang, C.Y.; Bastow, K.F.; Wu, T.S.; Pan, S.L.; et al. Antitumor agents 295. E-ring hydroxylated antofine and cryptopleurine analogues as antiproliferative agents: Design, synthesis, and mechanistic studies. J. Med. Chem. 2012, 55, 6751–6761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Wilson, W.R.; Hay, M.P. Targeting hypoxia in cancer therapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2011, 11, 393–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Dewhirst, M.W.; Cao, Y.; Moeller, B. Cycling hypoxia and free radicals regulate angiogenesis and radiotherapy response. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2008, 8, 425–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Denny, W.A. The role of hypoxia-activated prodrugs in cancer therapy. Lancet Oncol. 2000, 1, 25–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lunt, S.J.; Chaudary, N.; Hill, R.P. The tumor microenvironment and metastatic disease. Clin. Exp. Metastasis 2009, 26, 19–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Harris, A.L. Hypoxia--a key regulatory factor in tumour growth. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2002, 2, 38–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Kioi, M.; Vogel, H.; Schultz, G.; Hoffman, R.M.; Harsh, G.R.; Brown, J.M. Inhibition of vasculogenesis, but not angiogenesis, prevents the recurrence of glioblastoma after irradiation in mice. J. Clin. Invest. 2010, 120, 694–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Pennacchietti, S.; Michieli, P.; Galluzzo, M.; Mazzone, M.; Giordano, S.; Comoglio, P.M. Hypoxia promotes invasive growth by transcriptional activation of the met protooncogene. Cancer Cell 2003, 3, 347–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Vaupel, P.; Hockel, M.; Mayer, A. Detection and characterization of tumor hypoxia using pO2 histography. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2007, 9, 1221–1235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Jing, X.; Yang, F.; Shao, C.; Wei, K.; Xie, M.; Shen, H.; Shu, Y. Role of hypoxia in cancer therapy by regulating the tumor microenvironment. Mol. Cancer 2019, 18, 157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Zhang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Wang, M.; Schmid, T.; Xin, Z.; Kozhuharova, L.; Yu, W.K.; Huang, Y.; Cai, F.; Biskup, E. Hypoxia in Breast Cancer-Scientific Translation to Therapeutic and Diagnostic Clinical Applications. Front. Oncol. 2021, 11, 652266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Shi, R.; Liao, C.; Zhang, Q. Hypoxia-Driven Effects in Cancer: Characterization, Mechanisms, and Therapeutic Implications. Cells 2021, 10, 678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Brown, J.M.; Wilson, W.R. Exploiting tumour hypoxia in cancer treatment. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2004, 4, 437–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Chen, Y.; Hu, L. Design of anticancer prodrugs for reductive activation. Med. Res. Rev. 2009, 29, 29–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Zeng, Y.; Ma, J.; Zhan, Y.; Xu, X.; Zeng, Q.; Liang, J.; Chen, X. Hypoxia-activated prodrugs and redox-responsive nanocarriers. Int. J. Nanomed. 2018, 13, 6551–6574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Li, Y.; Zhao, L.; Li, X.F. The Hypoxia-Activated Prodrug TH-302: Exploiting Hypoxia in Cancer Therapy. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 12, 636892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. He, H.; Zhu, R.; Sun, W.; Cai, K.; Chen, Y.; Yin, L. Selective cancer treatment via photodynamic sensitization of hypoxia-responsive drug delivery. Nanoscale 2018, 10, 2856–2865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Long, M.; Lu, A.; Lu, M.; Weng, L.; Chen, Q.; Zhu, L.; Chen, Z. Azo-inserted responsive hybrid liposomes for hypoxia-specific drug delivery. Acta Biomater. 2020, 115, 343–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Weng, J.; Huang, Z.; Pu, X.; Chen, X.; Yin, G.; Tian, Y.; Song, Y. Preparation of polyethylene glycol-polyacrylic acid block copolymer micelles with pH/hypoxic dual-responsive for tumor chemoradiotherapy. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2020, 191, 110943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Guise, C.P.; Mowday, A.M.; Ashoorzadeh, A.; Yuan, R.; Lin, W.H.; Wu, D.H.; Smaill, J.B.; Patterson, A.V.; Ding, K. Bioreductive prodrugs as cancer therapeutics: Targeting tumor hypoxia. Chin. J. Cancer 2014, 33, 80–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wilson, W.R.; Ferry, D.M.; Tercel, M.; Anderson, R.F.; Denny, W.A. Reduction of nitroarylmethyl quaternary ammonium prodrugs of mechlorethamine by radiation. Radiat. Res. 1998, 149, 237–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kriste, A.G.; Tercel, M.; Anderson, R.F.; Ferry, D.M.; Wilson, W.R. Pathways of reductive fragmentation of heterocyclic nitroarylmethyl quaternary ammonium prodrugs of mechlorethamine. Radiat. Res. 2002, 158, 753–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Smaill, J.B.; Patterson, A.V.; Hay, M.P.; Denny, W.A.; Wilson, W.R.; Lu, G.-L.; Anderson, R.F.; Lee, H.H.; Ashoorzadeh, A. Prodrug Forms of Kinase Inhibitors and Their Use in Therapy. PCT International Application. WO2010104406A1, 16 September 2010. Available online: https://patents.google.com/patent/WO2010104406A1/ja (accessed on 21 May 2021).
  44. Liu, S.V.; Villaruz, L.C.; Lee, V.H.F.; Zhu, V.W.; Baik, C.S.; Sacher, A.; McCoach, C.E.; Nguyen, D.; Li, J.Y.C.; Pacheco, J.M.; et al. LBA61 First analysis of RAIN-701: Study of tarloxotinib in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) EGFR Exon 20 insertion, HER2-activating mutations & other solid tumours with NRG1/ERBB gene fusions. Ann. Oncol. 2020, 31, S1189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wang, Z.; Li, Z.; Wang, K.; Wang, Q. Efficient and Chirally Specific Synthesis of Phenanthro-Indolizidine Alkaloids by Parham-Type Cycloacylation. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 2010, 292–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Lu, G.-L.; Ashoorzadeh, A.; Anderson, R.F.; Patterson, A.V.; Smaill, J.B. Synthesis of substituted 5-bromomethyl-4-nitroimidazoles and use for the preparation of the hypoxia-selective multikinase inhibitor SN29966. Tetrahedron 2013, 69, 9130–9138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Omran, Z.; Alarja, M.; Abdalla, A.N.; Ibrahim, M.M.; Hossain, M.A.; Chen, L.; Liu, Y.; Wang, Q. Design, Synthesis, and in Vitro Biological Evaluation of 14-Hydroxytylophorine-dichloroacetate Co-drugs as Antiproliferative Agents. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2019, 67, 1208–1210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Hill, J.R. In Vitro Drug Metabolism Using Liver Microsomes. Curr. Protoc. Pharmacol. 2003, 23, 7.8.1–7.8.11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Skehan, P.; Storeng, R.; Scudiero, D.; Monks, A.; McMahon, J.; Vistica, D.; Warren, J.T.; Bokesch, H.; Kenney, S.; Boyd, M.R. New colorimetric cytotoxicity assay for anticancer-drug screening. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1990, 82, 1107–1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Guise, C.P.; Wang, A.T.; Theil, A.; Bridewell, D.J.; Wilson, W.R.; Patterson, A.V. Identification of human reductases that activate the dinitrobenzamide mustard prodrug PR-104A: A role for NADPH:cytochrome P450 oxidoreductase under hypoxia. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2007, 74, 810–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Molecules 26 03327 g001 550
Figure 1. Chemical structure of some phenanthroindolizidine alkaloids.
Figure 1. Chemical structure of some phenanthroindolizidine alkaloids.
Molecules 26 03327 g001
Molecules 26 03327 g002 550
Figure 2. Chemical structure of some hypoxia-targeted nitro(hetero)aromatic-based prodrugs.
Figure 2. Chemical structure of some hypoxia-targeted nitro(hetero)aromatic-based prodrugs.
Molecules 26 03327 g002
Molecules 26 03327 g003 550
Figure 3. Chemical synthesis of prodrugs 5a–c.
Figure 3. Chemical synthesis of prodrugs 5a–c.
Molecules 26 03327 g003
Molecules 26 03327 g004 550
Figure 4. Stability of prodrugs 5a,b in mouse (A), and in human (B) plasma.
Figure 4. Stability of prodrugs 5a,b in mouse (A), and in human (B) plasma.
Molecules 26 03327 g004
Molecules 26 03327 g005 550
Figure 5. Mouse hepatic microsomal stability for prodrugs 5a,b and their parent alkaloids.
Figure 5. Mouse hepatic microsomal stability for prodrugs 5a,b and their parent alkaloids.
Molecules 26 03327 g005
Molecules 26 03327 g006 550
Figure 6. Cytotoxicity of compounds 5a–c and their parent alkaloids under normoxia and hypoxia against (A) HCT116 and (B) H460 (IC50, nM).
Figure 6. Cytotoxicity of compounds 5a–c and their parent alkaloids under normoxia and hypoxia against (A) HCT116 and (B) H460 (IC50, nM).
Molecules 26 03327 g006
Table
Table 1. Physiochemical properties prodrugs 5a,b and their parent alkaloids.
Table 1. Physiochemical properties prodrugs 5a,b and their parent alkaloids.
CompoundPBS (pH 7.4) Solubility
μM Mean ± SE		LogD
Mean ± SE		Permeability (Papp)
Log [10−6 cm/s]
Mean ± SE		PPB (% of Bound Compound)
Mean ± SE
5a154 ± 00.69 ± 0.01<−787.0 ± 15
5b162 ± 30.38 ± 0.04<−758.9 ± 0.9
(R)-Antofine27 ± 23.68 ± 0.03−5.6 ± 0.5898.1 ± 0.15
(S)-Tylophorine2 ± 03.14 ± 0.02−5.4 ± 0.1793.9 ± 0.7
Ondansetron
(Reference)		96 ± 3---
Mebendazole
(Reference)		-3.26 ± 0.01--
Chlorpromazine
(Reference)		--−5.4 ± 0.13-
Clozapine
(Reference)		--−5.1 ± 0.12-
Ranitidine
(Reference)		--<−7-
Verapamil
(Reference)		---89.4 ± 0.4
Table
Table 2. Mouse and human plasm stability for prodrugs 5a,b, t1/2: half-life.
Table 2. Mouse and human plasm stability for prodrugs 5a,b, t1/2: half-life.
Compoundt1/2, h
(Mouse Plasma)		t1/2, h
(Human Plasma)
5a65.1 ± 0.7144.7 ± 4.7
5b73.0 ± 1.763.3 ± 0.1
Verapamil
(Reference)		13.0 ± 1.012.2 ± 0.4
Propantheline
(Reference)		<3<3
Table
Table 3. Mouse hepatic microsomal stability for prodrugs 5a,b and their parent alkaloids. Kel: elimination rate constant, t1/2: half-life.
Table 3. Mouse hepatic microsomal stability for prodrugs 5a,b and their parent alkaloids. Kel: elimination rate constant, t1/2: half-life.
CompoundKel, min−1t1/2, min
5a0.010 ± 0286.9 ± 6.5
5b0.002 ± 0404.0 ± 3.2
(R)-Antofine0.002 ± 067.5 ± 2.1
(S)-Tylophorine0.005 ± 0127.5 ± 3.0
Imipramine
(Reference)		0.083 ± 08.3 ± 0.4
Propranolol
(Reference)		0.021 ± 033.5 ± 1.0
Table
Table 4. Cytotoxicity of compounds 5a–c and their parent alkaloids under normoxia (nM, IC50).
Table 4. Cytotoxicity of compounds 5a–c and their parent alkaloids under normoxia (nM, IC50).
CompoundHEK293CHO-K1MCF7HCT116RKOSW480MRC5
5a5080 ± 5191680 ± 5421530 ± 1441038 ± 212034 ± 2671350 ± 0.126327 ± 147
5b950 ± 1743490 ± 8431498 ± 1283304 ± 15624056 ± 1817245 ± 4903313 ± 163
5c--8050 ± 03439019 ± 11288821 ± 30819862 ± 16933943 ± 127
(R)-Antofine30 ± 4333 ± 502 ± 02 ± 06 ± 19 ± 026 ± 2
(S)-Tylophorine16 ± 2635 ± 4262 ± 1385 ± 6202 ± 369 ± 2027 ± 2
(R)-Tylophorine--101 ± 88440 ± 36338 ± 0611148 ± 024495 ± 6
Table
Table 5. Cytotoxicity of compounds 5a–c and their parent alkaloids under normoxia and hypoxia (IC50, nM).
Table 5. Cytotoxicity of compounds 5a–c and their parent alkaloids under normoxia and hypoxia (IC50, nM).
Cell LineHCT116H460
CompoundIC50
(Normoxia)		DRIC50
(Hypoxia)		HCRIC50
(Normoxia)		DRIC50
(Hypoxia)		HCR
5a16,471.5 ± 11,571543424.7 ± 518.815,847.0 ± 6339543618.0 ± 4426
(R)-Antofine23.9 ± 716.7 ± 90.429.2 ± 1225.4 ± 90.6
5b4489.0 ± 6986891463.3 ± 41111.377,598.3 ± 22,4027193220.0 ± 107124
(S)-Tylophorine35.1 ± 1550.1 ± 180.5107.9 ± 28101.9 ± 321.1
5c9055.0 ± 75921283024.7 ± 6561.551,024.7 ± 22,4022936500.0 ± 18127.8
(R)-Tylophorine1711.0 ± 96556.4 ± 350.6174.9 ± 78160.9 ± 771.1
PR-104A16,471.5 ± 11,571-860.7 ± 12210.51337 ± 386-533.0 ± 472.5
Evofosfamide23.9 ± 7-20.1 ± 3854322.7 ± 1931-17.2 ± 1251
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Omran, Z.; Guise, C.P.; Chen, L.; Rauch, C.; Abdalla, A.N.; Abdullah, O.; Sindi, I.A.; Fischer, P.M.; Smaill, J.B.; Patterson, A.V.; et al. Design, Synthesis and In-Vitro Biological Evaluation of Antofine and Tylophorine Prodrugs as Hypoxia-Targeted Anticancer Agents. Molecules 2021, 26, 3327. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26113327

AMA Style

Omran Z, Guise CP, Chen L, Rauch C, Abdalla AN, Abdullah O, Sindi IA, Fischer PM, Smaill JB, Patterson AV, et al. Design, Synthesis and In-Vitro Biological Evaluation of Antofine and Tylophorine Prodrugs as Hypoxia-Targeted Anticancer Agents. Molecules. 2021; 26(11):3327. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26113327

Chicago/Turabian Style

Omran, Ziad, Chris P. Guise, Linwei Chen, Cyril Rauch, Ashraf N. Abdalla, Omeima Abdullah, Ikhlas A. Sindi, Peter M. Fischer, Jeff B. Smaill, Adam V. Patterson, and et al. 2021. "Design, Synthesis and In-Vitro Biological Evaluation of Antofine and Tylophorine Prodrugs as Hypoxia-Targeted Anticancer Agents" Molecules 26, no. 11: 3327. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26113327

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop