Next Article in Journal
New Frontiers for the Use of IP6 and Inositol Combination in Treating Diabetes Mellitus: A Review
Next Article in Special Issue
2-Methyloxolane as a Bio-Based Solvent for Green Extraction of Aromas from Hops (Humulus lupulus L.)
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction and Solvent on the Phenolic Profile, Bacterial Growth, and Anti-Inflammatory/Antioxidant Activities of Mediterranean Olive and Fig Leaves Extracts
Previous Article in Special Issue
Direct Analysis of Psilocin and Muscimol in Urine Samples Using Single Drop Microextraction Technique In-Line with Capillary Electrophoresis
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 25
Issue 7
10.3390/molecules25071719
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Green Approaches to Sample Preparation Based on Extraction Techniques

by
Alshymaa A. Aly
1,2 and
Tadeusz Górecki
1,*
1
Department of Chemistry, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
2
Analytical Chemistry Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Minia University, Menia Governorate 61519, Egypt
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2020, 25(7), 1719; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25071719
Submission received: 21 February 2020 / Revised: 25 March 2020 / Accepted: 29 March 2020 / Published: 9 April 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Analytical methods and Green chemistry: A Themed Issue in Honor of Professor Jacek Namieśnik)
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Preparing a sample for analysis is a crucial step of many analytical procedures. The goal of sample preparation is to provide a representative, homogenous sample that is free of interferences and compatible with the intended analytical method. Green approaches to sample preparation require that the consumption of hazardous organic solvents and energy be minimized or even eliminated in the analytical process. While no sample preparation is clearly the most environmentally friendly approach, complete elimination of this step is not always practical. In such cases, the extraction techniques which use low amounts of solvents or no solvents are considered ideal alternatives. This paper presents an overview of green extraction procedures and sample preparation methodologies, briefly introduces their theoretical principles, and describes the recent developments in food, pharmaceutical, environmental and bioanalytical chemistry applications.

1. Introduction

In recent years, awareness of the impact of dangerous solvents on the environment has increased significantly. Many developments have been introduced to reduce this impact and protect the environment. If a development meets the requirements of the current generations without affecting the needs of future generations, it is considered sustainable [1]. The overarching goal of sustainable development is to enhance the quality of life, even at a cost of certain restrictions to human actions. Technologies that mainly involve chemical activities at both industrial and laboratory scale are considered major factors influencing sustainability. Even small-scale activities of chemists, such as laboratory experiments utilizing significant volumes of hazardous chemicals, have the potential to negatively affect the environment in case of uncontrolled disposal of chemical waste [2].
Various measures have been developed to mitigate the impact of chemical activities and to protect the environment and the chemists that are often in direct contact with hazardous chemical reagents and samples (environmental, biological, clinical, etc.) [3,4,5,6]. A variety of terms such as “green chemistry”, “environmentally benign chemistry”, “clean chemistry”, etc. [7], have been introduced to emphasize the need to perform chemical activities in an environmentally friendly way. These approaches rely on minimizing the consumption of reagents and the generation of waste, and eliminating hazardous chemicals [8]. The concept of “green chemistry” was introduced in 1998 by Anastas [9]. Green analytical chemistry (GAC), an offshoot of green chemistry, relies on green chemistry principles to increase the safety of operators, decrease energy consumption, properly manage wastes, minimize or even eliminate the use of hazardous chemicals and replace them with benign ones whenever practical [10,11].
In practice, four factors—sample collection, sample preparation, reagents, and instrumentation, are considered significant in greening analytical methods [2]. Preparing the sample prior to analysis is a fundamental part of many analytical protocols. As a result, it is very important to make this step greener, especially if samples are prepared from complex matrices. Recent progress in sample preparation techniques have been focused on automation, miniaturization and simplification of the extraction procedures [12].
Several books devoted to this area have been published, such as Green Analytical Chemistry [13], Green Analytical Chemistry: Past, Present and Perspectives [14], and Handbook of Green Analytical Chemistry [15]. In addition to this, several review articles presenting some of these green sample preparation techniques have been published in the last twenty years [1,14,16,17,18,19,20,21]. Herein, an overview of various benign sample preparation and extraction techniques, their theoretical principles and recent applications will be described in detail.

2. Ecofriendly Extraction and Sample Preparation Procedures

2.1. Direct Analysis without Sample Pretreatment

Various steps including drying, grinding, dissolution, etc. are necessary to treat solid samples before analysis. Additional steps such as distillation, evaporation, precipitation or re-crystallization might be required before measurement to increase the concentration of the target analyte(s) in the sample to match the sensitivity of the instrument. Numerous instruments require liquid samples, which have to be prepared using large volumes of organic solvents that have the potential to seriously affect both the environment and the chemists.
To limit the impact of solvents on the environment, the preferred approach is to use direct analysis, which eliminates the need for sample preparation. However, direct methodologies are usually appropriate only when analyzing clean matrices [22]. Nevertheless, they have been successfully implemented in both gas and liquid chromatography. Sample preparation-free gas chromatographic analysis based on direct on-column injection was introduced in 1978 [23]. Other applications adopted direct injection to analyze various compounds in water samples, such as halogenated compounds [24], volatile organic compounds [25], volatile organic components with various polarities [26] and high-boiling volatile organic compounds [27]. An example of direct analysis in liquid chromatography is the determination of pesticides in water samples without sample pretreatment [28]. Other analytical procedures requiring only simple sample pretreatment, such as filtration [29], dilution [30] or centrifugation [31], can be considered direct green techniques.

2.2. Green Sample Preparation Methodologies

Sample preparation is the most time-consuming step in many methodologies, especially those used for complicated matrices. In order to make this step more benign, various approaches including miniaturization, simplification and automation of extraction procedures have been adopted. Following is an overview of the most common green sample preparation methods focusing mostly on organic analytes.

2.2.1. Solid Phase Extraction (SPE)

SPE is one of the most widely used sample preparation techniques. In SPE, an aqueous sample is passed through a short column containing a suitable solid sorbent, and the solutes are adsorbed onto the column. Afterwards, small amounts of organic solvents of high elution strength are used to recover the analytes from the sorbent, which leads to their enrichment [32]. Solid phase extraction utilizes small amounts of solvent and generates little waste. As a result, it is considered an ecofriendly technique. Despite the merits of this technique, it has some potential downsides that must be considered in order to avoid inefficient extraction of analytes. One of the issues is the non-uniformity of the packing material bed, which may lead to efficiency loss. The use of commercial cartridges is a safe way to alleviate this problem. In addition, limited selectivity of some conventional sorbents may lead to insufficient retention of very polar compounds [33]. Another issue is the competition between the analytes and the sample matrix for retention, which can dramatically impact analyte recovery. Consequently, careful optimization of the method is required to ensure effective extraction of analytes [34].
SPE has been implemented as a green sample preparation method in a large variety of applications. Several review articles presented selected applications of SPE in different areas [34,35,36,37,38,39]. Some examples of SPE applications are listed in Table 1.

QuEChERS Extraction Methodology

QuEChERS is a popular extraction method which is renowned for its quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged and safe characteristics. The initial letter(s) of each of these words form the acronym under which the technique is known. The detailed QuEChERS procedure was introduced in 2002 by Anastassiades et al. [73]. This technique utilizes small volumes of organic solvents compared to other extraction procedures, and that is why it is considered a green extraction technique. QuEChERS procedures involve two main steps: solvent extraction and sample clean up. The solvent extraction step is performed via vigorous shaking of the sample with acetonitrile (extraction solvent), anhydrous magnesium sulfate and sodium chloride (salting out), and buffer (to protect base-sensitive analytes in the sample). The sample cleanup step is crucial in order to eliminate interfering matrix compounds such as fatty acids and carbohydrates. This is done through quick dispersive solid phase extraction to clean the extract using magnesium sulfate (to absorb residual water) and a weak anion exchanger called “primary secondary amine” (PSA) sorbent as dispersive solid-phase extraction agent [74].
Initially, QuEChERS was considered the method of choice in the analysis of pesticide residues in vegetables and fruits [75]. More recently, it has found numerous applications in the analysis of a plethora of other compounds in food and other types of matrices. Several reviews have presented the applications of QuEChERS as an effective extraction methodology [76,77,78]. Prominent examples of QuEChERS applications in food analysis include the analysis of mycotoxins in rice [79], quinolones in fish by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) [80], acrylamide in Sudanese food [81], determination of sulfonamide residues in pasteurized milk [82], as well as pesticide residues in honeybees [83] and fruits and vegetables [84,85]. In addition to this, some applications employed QuEChERS to extract analytes of interest from blood samples, including extraction of 40 pharmaceutical drugs from blood before determination by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) [86], removal of various contaminants from human blood samples [87], extraction of amphetamines, opiates and cocaine metabolites from blood before analysis by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry [88], and recently complete extraction of tetrahydrocannabinol and its metabolites from blood samples followed by gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry [89].

Solid Phase Microextraction (SPME)

SPME was introduced by Belardi and Pawliszyn in 1989. According to the GAC guidelines, it is a green extraction procedure because it avoids the use of organic solvents and combines extraction, enrichment and sample injection into a single step. Analytes can be efficiently extracted by SPME from liquid or gas samples by absorption into or adsorption onto a thin layer of polymer attached to a solid surface of a fiber fixed inside a capillary or an injection needle. Analytes partition between the sample matrix and the SPME fiber coating when the fiber is immersed directly in the sample (direct immersion, or DI-SPME), or between the sample headspace and the fiber coating when the fiber is placed in the space above the sample (HS-SPME). Partitioning continues until equilibrium is established between all phases involved. When the extraction process is completed, the SPME fiber is transferred directly to the analytical instrument of choice, typically a gas chromatograph, where analyte desorption takes place. The major advantages of SPME include low cost, simplicity, elimination of the solvent disposal costs, short sample preparation time, reliability, sensitivity, and selectivity. Nevertheless, there are some drawbacks which should be pinpointed to avoid poor results. They include the fragility of the fiber, which may be easily broken during handling, the potential damage of the fiber coating if it is used repeatedly, competitive sorption when adsorbent-type coatings are used, pronounced effect of temperature and mass transfer conditions on equilibration, matrix effects, etc. Consequently, adequate quality control and quality assurance measures are essential when using SPME.
SPME has been employed successfully numerous times as an ecofriendly sample preparation technique combined with GC or GC-MS prior to analysis of organic compounds in complicated sample matrices [90]. In addition to this, SPME has also been used effectively in combination with high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) in the analysis of thermally unstable or poorly volatile compounds which cannot be analyzed by gas chromatography [90]. However, SPME is not a completely solvent-free technique when combined with HPLC because small volumes of the organic solvent are necessary for desorption of the analytes from the fiber prior to HPLC separation. Numerous reviews have presented the applications of SPME in the analysis of various samples, e.g., [91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104]. Table 2 illustrates some representative examples of SPME applications.

Microextraction by Packed Sorbent (MEPS)

MEPS uses the same sorbents as SPE. However, in this technique, analytes are concentrated onto a small amount of a sorbent integrated into a syringe. The analytes are recovered from the sorbent using a small volume of a suitable solvent. The liquid extract is then injected into a chromatographic system for further analysis, and sorbent regeneration can be effectively achieved by washing it with additional portions of a solvent. MEPS is considered more advantageous than SPE because sorbent integration into a liquid-handling syringe results in low void volume and makes sample manipulations easy. Furthermore, MEPS procedures significantly reduce the solvent volume compared to conventional solid phase extraction (about 10 µL vs. several mL for the latter). As a result, the extraction time can be reduced to as little as one minute with minimal solvent and energy consumption. In addition to this, MEPS can be performed online in a fully automated fashion using the same syringe for sample extraction and extract injection into the analytical instrument. Numerous applications employing MEPS as an environmentally friendly extraction technique for various matrices have been described, including tricyclic antidepressant drugs in human oral fluid [137], non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in urine and human plasma [138], brominated diphenyl ethers in sewage sludge [139], clenbuterol in pork samples [140], drugs of abuse in plasma (cocaine, amphetamines and opiates) [141] and human hair [142], various metabolites in urine [143] as well as risperidone and clozapine with their metabolites in urine [144].

Stir-Bar Sorptive Extraction (SBSE)

SBSE is a green, solvent-free extraction technique which was introduced in 1999 as an alternative to SPME. SBSE was initially used for the extraction and enrichment of volatile analytes from aqueous matrices. Its applications have been extended later to the analysis of the headspace over solid or liquid samples, gaseous samples, as well as nonvolatile analytes in combination with HPLC. Like SPME, SBSE involves sorptive extraction. However, in this case analytes are absorbed into a layer of a polymer (e.g., polydimethylsiloxane; PDMS) coated on a magnetic stir rod rather than a fiber. Extraction efficiency depends on the partitioning coefficient of the analytes between the sample and the coating. The major difference between SBSE and SPME is the much larger volume of the sorptive phase used with the former. This results in better sensitivity, especially for compounds with low partition coefficients or when using large sample volumes. Volatile analytes extracted by the coating can be thermally desorbed directly into a GC, making this technique in this case completely solvent-free. Nonvolatile analytes are desorbed with small volumes of a solvent, maintaining the green character of the method.
Examples of SBSE applications include determination of volatile compounds in cooked cured pork ham [145], volatile organic compounds in human urine, and water samples [146], organic pollutants in water samples [147], free fatty acids in the exudates of cooked ham [148], barbiturates in urine [149], coffee volatiles in roasted Arabica coffee [150], organic pollutants in water samples [151] and odorous compounds in drinking water [152]. Recently, SBSE has been used for enhanced recovery of pesticides in wines and aromatic compounds in beers [153] and selective enrichment and analysis of polychlorinated biphenyls in fish [154].

Solid Phase Nanoextraction (SPNE)

SPNE is based on strong affinity of analytes to nanoparticles. In this extraction technique, an aqueous sample is mixed with a colloidal solution of nanoparticles. Analytes bind to the nanoparticles’ surface in a very short time. Afterwards, centrifugation is performed to recover the nanoparticles, and the analytes are recovered from them using various solvents. There have been several applications which adopted SPNE as a green extraction technique, e.g., the analysis of PAHs (polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons) in drinking water [155,156] and polychlorinated biphenyls in environmental waters [157].

2.2.2. Liquid-Phase Microextraction Techniques (LPME)

LPME techniques use a small volume of an organic solvent (typically 1–100 μL) to extract the analytes. The major modes of LPME are single drop microextraction (SDME), hollow fiber liquid-phase microextraction (HF-LPME) and dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME).

Single Drop Microextraction (SDME)

SDME, also referred to as liquid–liquid microextraction (LLME), involves the distribution of the analytes between an aqueous sample and a small droplet of a solvent suspended at the tip of a microsyringe needle. Once equilibrium between the two phases is reached, the microdrop is retracted into the syringe, and introduced to the analytical system. If the drop is directly immersed in the aqueous sample, the technique is called direct immersion SDME (DI-SDME); when the drop is fixed in the headspace above the sample, the technique is called headspace SDME (HS-SDME) [158]. Extraction efficiency in SDME is dependent on several parameters, including extraction time, the nature of the organic solvent and the analytes, stirring conditions, organic drop volume, etc. These parameters must be carefully optimized during method development to obtain the best results [159].
SDME has become popular because it is a nearly solvent-free extraction technique (only a few µL of a solvent are required). In addition to this, it is inexpensive, easy to operate, can be used to highly enrich analytes in a relatively short time, and can be conducted using very basic apparatus. These features make this technique more advantageous than other microextraction techniques in the eyes of many users. SDME has been widely employed as a green microextraction technique for trace analysis in chemical, biological, food, environmental, clinical, pharmaceutical, and forensic analysis. Representative examples include analysis of Pd, Be, Co, and Cd in biological samples [160], methamphetamine in human plasma and urine [161], carbaryl and triazophos pesticides in fruit juice and water samples [162], organic compounds in environmental matrices [163], xylene, toluene, benzene, and ethylbenzene in water samples [164], essential oils in plants and herbs [165], accelerants of fire in fire debris samples [166], volatile organic compounds in water and air [167], phenol derivatives in dairy products and soft drinks and organophosphorus pesticides in juice [168].

Hollow Fiber Liquid-Phase Microextraction (HF-LPME)

This microextraction technique utilizes a porous capillary made of an inert material as a carrier for the extraction solvent. It can be operated in two modes [158]:
  • Two-phase hollow fiber LPME. In this technique, an organic solvent fills the pores and lumen of a semipermeable membrane, which is a porous hollow fiber made e.g. of polypropylene. The membrane is immersed in the sample and analytes partition through the pores of the membrane into the organic solvent inside.
  • Three-phase hollow fiber LPME. In this technique, an immiscible solvent fills the pores of the hollow fiber, which separates the sample from another solvent inside the lumen, so that two equilibria for the analytes take place. The first one is between the aqueous sample and the organic solvent in the capillary wall pores, and the second one is between the solvent in the pores and the solvent in the lumen. In other words, the analytes cross the organic solvent embedded in the holes of the semipermeable membrane and are concentrated into a third phase inside the capillary’s lumen.
HF-LPME has been utilized as a green microextraction methodology for multiple analytes, such as chlorophenols in water samples [169], organic contaminants in the aquatic environment [170], pesticides and their metabolites in water and soils [171], antidepressants in vitreous humor [172], NSAIDs in sewage sludge [173], amino alcohols in water samples [174], anabolic steroids in urine [175], selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in sewage sludge [176], basic drugs in water [177], haloacetic acids in water [178], cocaine and its derivatives in hair [179], bisphenol A in river water samples [180], organochlorine pesticides in water [181], pesticides in environmental water [182,183], chloroanilines in water samples [184], aromatic amines in environmental water samples [185], paraben preservatives in cosmetic samples [186], short-chain fatty acids in plasma [187], fungicides in water [188], food analysis [189,190], nortriptyline in biological matrices [191], aromatic hydrocarbon isomers [192] and pesticide residues in food samples [193].

Dispersive Liquid-Liquid Microextraction (DLLME)

DLLME is a novel addition to LPME. It was introduced in 2006 by Rezaee et al. [194]. The technique involves a three-phase system, which consists of an aqueous sample, a water-immiscible extracting solvent, and a dispersive solvent that is miscible with both phases. The two solvents are mixed together, and the mixture is injected rapidly into the sample forming a very fine emulsion. This allows very fast transfer of the analytes into the dispersed extraction solvent. The emulsion formed is then centrifuged, and the high-density extracting phase is collected with a microsyringe and introduced into the analytical instrument of choice. DLLME offers several advantages including small sample volume, low consumption of solvents, high enrichment factor, good repeatability, and high recovery. The fine emulsion formed after the addition of the solvent mixture results in a large contact area between the aqueous phase and the extracting solvent. Consequently, the equilibration is fast and the extraction is efficient.
All types of LPME are equilibrium techniques. They are particularly suitable for the extraction of nonpolar analytes from aqueous samples. The presence of the water-miscible dispersive solvent may lead to the reduction of the analyte’s partition coefficient between water and the extracting solvent. To mitigate this limitation, dispersion of the extraction solvent in the sample can be achieved by the application of ultrasounds [195], vortexing [196,197] or air [198]. When ultrasounds are used in order to disperse the extraction solvent in the sample, the technique is called US-DLLME.
DLLME has been applied for the extraction of numerous analytes from various matrices, including phthalate esters in soybean milk [199] and in commercial beverages [200], milk and dairy products [201], biogenic amines in meat [202], methylated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in water [203], tetrabromobisphenol A from dust samples [204], organochlorine pesticide residues in honey [205], amines in home-made fermented alcoholic drinks [206], chlorinated phenols in water samples [207], volatile organohalogen compounds in drinking water [208] and aryloxyphenoxy-propionate herbicides in water [209]. Other applications which adopted US-DLLME included the analysis of endosulfan and its metabolites in urine and soil samples [210] and pyrethroids in soil [211].
Another development in DLLME was the utilization of ionic liquids as alternative extraction solvents rather than toxic chlorinated solvents. This technique has been named IL-DLLME. It is considered a green technique because it avoids the use of toxic solvents and can be performed without using a disperser solvent. When ionic liquids are adopted for extraction of aqueous samples, the system can be heated until it is homogeneous, then cooled to promote phase separation. Afterwards, the ionic liquid with the analytes is isolated by centrifugation. Procedures based on this principle are called temperature-controlled IL-DLLME. Numerous applications of IL-DLLME have been developed, including determination of pesticides and their metabolites in soils [212], copper in natural waters [213], chlorophenols in honey samples [214], organophosphorus pesticides in wheat [215], phenols [216], trihalomethanes in water [217], polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons [218], and organophosphorus pesticides in environmental samples [219].

2.2.3. Membrane Extraction

These procedures utilize nonporous membranes that can be a solid (polymer impregnated with a liquid) or a liquid, and which are fixed between two other phases, usually liquid, but sometimes gaseous.

Supported Liquid Membrane Extraction (SLME)

SLME is based on the same principle as three-phase HF-LPME; there is variation in solute concentration between donor and acceptor phases. Adjusting the concentration gradient between these two phases can be achieved by adjusting the pH; the solutes exist in nonionized form in the donor phase, and ionized form in the acceptor phase. Analytes in nonionized form in the donor phase can be easily extracted into the membrane, while the ionized form is irreversibly trapped in the acceptor phase. Afterwards, the acceptor phase is introduced into the analytical instrument of choice for the analysis. Examples of the use of SLME as an ecofriendly extraction technique include determination of metals in waste water [220], pesticides in water [221], phenols in water samples [222], black B dye in waste water [223] and basic drugs in human plasma [224].

Microporous Membrane Liquid–Liquid Extraction (MMLLE)

MMLLE technique is based on the same principle as two-phase HF-LPME, and the only difference is the name used for this technique. The analytes partition between the aqueous and organic phase across the membrane. MMLLE permits the extraction and enrichment of analytes which cannot be extracted by SLME [20]. MMLLE has been used for the extraction and enrichment of numerous compounds from various complicated matrices. Examples include determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon in soil [225], organotin compounds [226], sulfonylurea herbicides in water samples [227] and pesticide residues in red wines [228].

Membrane Extraction with a Sorbent Interface (MESI)

This technique was first described more than two decades ago. It is a solvent-free technique that allows direct introduction of preconcentrated analytes to a gas chromatograph. MESI can be used to monitor semivolatile and volatile organic compounds on site. It requires no sample preparation, and the potential for analyte losses is dramatically reduced. MESI preconcentrates analytes during the extraction process, enhancing the sensitivity of trace analysis.
MESI is based on partitioning of the analytes from a gas or a liquid phase into a nonporous polymeric membrane. The analytes permeating through the membrane are then released from the inner membrane surface into a stream of gas passing through the extraction module. The gas carries the analytes to a suitable sorbent placed in-line, which traps and concentrates them. The enriched analytes are periodically thermally desorbed and directly introduced into a GC column by a stream of carrier gas. MESI is thus a solvent-free membrane extraction technique which can be applied to on-site analysis and produces semicontinuous data, meeting numerous requirements of GAC. It has been applied for the extraction of various analytes, including biogenic emissions from eucalyptus leaves [229], toluene, benzene, xylene and ethylbenzene in water [230], volatile organic compounds in breath [231] as well as aromatic hydrocarbons in soil, water and air [232]. MESI was also applied for field analysis [233], analysis of human breath [234,235] and characterization of ethylene in human breath [236].

Membrane Assisted Solvent Extraction (MASE)

MASE is a substitute for standard liquid–liquid extraction (LLE). It is a small-scale LLE method utilizing a low-density polyethylene (LDPE) membrane, which isolates the aqueous sample from the organic solvent. Organic compounds in the aqueous sample are transferred across the polymeric membrane to a small amount of organic solvent, which is immiscible with water and is able to dissolve them. The extraction is typically performed at elevated temperature to accelerate mass transfer of the analytes into the solvent. The extract is then analyzed by gas chromatography. Since MASE uses only small amounts of organic solvents for the extraction, it is considered a green technique. MASE applications include the analysis of synthetic musks in water [237], endocrine disrupting compounds in wastewater [238], organophosphorus pesticides in water [239], phenols [240], tetramines in food [241], organophosphorus compounds in complex samples [242] and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in wastewater [243].

Green Agarose Gel Electro-Membrane Extraction

Pedersen-Bjergaard introduced electro-membrane extraction (EME) in 2006 [244]. EME involves electric field-driven movement of charged cationic and anionic analytes from a donor into an acceptor phase via a hollow fiber membrane inserted between the two phases. The hollow fiber membrane is saturated with an organic solvent before extraction [245]. To avoid the use of organic solvents, agarose gel membrane was introduced as a green solvent-free alternative for EME [246]. This membrane offers several advantages compared to conventional EME membranes, such as easy preparation, wide availability, eco-friendliness and ability to extract polar compounds. Agarose gel membrane was adopted for the extraction of verapamil, rivastigmine, amlodipine and morphine. It was also coupled with dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction to extract basic drugs from biological fluids [247].

Microdialysis Sampling

Microdialysis is a minimally invasive sampling technique that can be used to enrich hydrophilic analytes with low molecular weight in vivo. This technique is based on placing a probe with a semipermeable membrane in the sample. An electrolyte solution is then pumped through the probe, creating a concentration gradient between the perfusate and the surrounding medium. The analytes are transferred into the perfusate because of this concentration gradient. The dialysate containing the enriched analytes is then injected into an analytical instrument. Microdialysis sampling is more advantageous than conventional LLE because it requires small samples and solvent volumes. There have been numerous applications for microdialysis in pharmacokinetic and drug metabolism studies to monitor biologically active compounds in vivo [248,249,250,251,252]. In addition to this, it has been widely employed for extracting some analytes such as sugar in milk products [253], pesticide residues in a jade plant [254], metal ions [255], alachlor and its metabolites in microbial culture medium [256], aniline and 2-chloroaniline in industrial wastewater [257] and recently proteins, cytokines and metabolites in wounds [258].

Thin-Film Microextraction (TFME)

The technique is based on the same principle as SPME, except that it uses a thin film of the extraction phase rather than a polymer coating on a fiber [259]. It is an ecofriendly solventless microextraction methodology which was used for the extraction of PAHs from water [260].

2.2.4. Green Alternatives to Extraction Solvents

Subcritical Water Extraction (SWE)

SWE is considered one of the greenest methodologies because water is naturally abundant, nontoxic, non-flammable, non-corrosive, environmentally safe and available at low cost. Nevertheless, water has some drawbacks that limit its use as a universal extraction solvent, such as low solubilizing power for nonpolar compounds, and high energy consumption during the extraction process. SWE is based on using superheated water instead of an organic solvent in the extraction process; below the critical point (Pc = 218 atm, Tc = 374 °C) water can extract polar analytes at low temperatures, whereas moderately polar or nonpolar organic analytes require higher temperatures for effective extraction. SWE is also called pressurized water extraction (PWE) or hot water extraction (HWE). SWE has been successfully used for the extraction of fatty acids, mannitol, antioxidants (phenols and flavonoids), sugars, resorcinol, essential oils, carotenoids, and pectin [261], polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in soil [262], dioxins in soil [263], explosives and heavy metals in soil [264], anthocyanins from fruit berry [265], europium and yttrium from waste cathode-ray tube phosphor [266], oil and tea saponins [267], isoflavones from herbal plants [268] and pesticides in soil [269].

Supercritical Fluid Extraction (SFE)

In this technique, analytes are extracted from the matrix using supercritical fluids as the extracting solvents. SFE is primarily used for the extraction of organic compounds from solid matrices, but can be used for liquids as well. The process can be carried out in two modes: static and dynamic. In the static mode, the solvent is added to the sample and the mixture is left for a certain time at the required temperature and pressure. The dynamic mode involves the supercritical fluid continuously flowing through the sample. In both modes, the fluid needs to be depressurized to release the analytes, which are then collected in a solvent or using a solid sorbent, or are transferred directly to a chromatographic system. The most popular solvent used in SFE is carbon dioxide because it is non-corrosive, non-explosive, easily available and inexpensive. SFE minimizes or completely eliminates the use of hazardous organic solvents, earning it green credentials. It has been used for the extraction of petroleum hydrocarbons in soil [270,271,272], polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in human adipose tissue [273], active constituents in medical plants [274,275], petroleum hydrocarbons (PHCs) in sand [276] and hazardous substances from solid and liquid matrices [277] among many others. Nowadays, SFE has been largely supplanted by pressurized liquid extraction in the analytical laboratories, and is used mainly for preparative purposes.

Ionic Liquids (ILs)

ILs are organic salts consisting of an organic or inorganic anion and a large organic cation, with melting temperatures below 100 °C. They offer unique characteristics such as non-volatility, negligible flammability, thermal stability (about ∼300 °C), strong solvation power for a wide variety of compounds and high ionic conductivity [278]. Consequently, they have been used as substituents for conventional organic solvents. They are sometimes regarded as ecofriendly solvents because they do not emit poisonous vapors to the surroundings. On the other hand, they can be toxic and form hazardous waste, thus the “green” designation is somewhat controversial. Research involving ILs is gradually moving toward the use of more biodegradable and less toxic formulations [279].
Most studied ILs consist of pyridinium, pyrrolidinium, imidazolium, phosphonium and tetraalkylammonium-based cations, attached to anions including bromide, acetate, chloride, bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide, tetrafluoroborate and hexafluorophosphate [280]. Ionic liquids have been utilized in extraction procedures including supported liquid membrane extraction [281], liquid–liquid microextraction [282] and dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME) [283,284]. Table 3 shows some examples of extraction techniques that involved the use of ionic liquids as a benign alternative to conventional organic solvents.

Deep Eutectic Solvents (DES)

Abbott et al. introduced deep eutectic solvents for the first time in 2001 [299]. They are a promising alternative to the conventionally used volatile organic solvents. In addition to this, they have been deemed the most sustainable green replacement for ionic liquids, as they are manufactured from natural compounds such as organic acids, amino acids, sugars, alcohols, and cholinium derivatives. DES are prepared by combining a hydrogen bond donor (HBD) and a hydrogen bond acceptor (HBA). The strong hydrogen bond interactions between HBD and HBA result in a dramatic drop in the melting temperature of the mixture.
DES offer multiple advantages over ILs, including wide availability of their cheap natural individual components and easy preparation (no need for chemical synthesis). In addition to this, they are characterized by biodegradability, high solubilization power, adjustable polarity, wide range of liquid state and negligible volatility. However, they are less chemically inert than ionic liquids and highly viscous. As a result, the rate of mass transfer in dissolution or extraction processes is reduced. This drawback, caused by stronger Van der Waals bonds, hydrogen-bonding and electrostatic interactions between mixture components, can be mitigated by the addition of water during the preparation or as a diluent. DES have been used as green solvents for the extraction of various solutes, allowing for environmental monitoring of numerous pollutants in real matrices. Some representative examples of their applications are illustrated in Table 4.

Surfactants and Hydrotropes

Surfactants are amphiphilic chemicals which contain both hydrophobic and hydrophilic fragments in the molecule. Consequently, they are soluble in both aqueous and organic phases. In water, when the concentration of surfactant molecules exceeds the critical micellar concentration (CMC), the molecules arrange in micelle forms, in which the nonpolar chains are in the center of the micelle, whereas the polar heads are in contact with water. On the other hand, in nonpolar media, surfactant molecules arrange with the polar heads in the center of the structure to form reverse micelles [322].
Surfactants can be adsorbed onto inorganic surfaces forming a monolayer or a bilayer. In the monolayer assembly, the head groups of an ionic surfactant are attracted to the oppositely charged mineral oxide surface (silica, titanium oxide or alumina) resulting in a hemimicelle. In the bilayer or admicelle aggregation, a second layer is formed on top of the monolayer through the interaction between the nonpolar chains of the monolayer adsorbed to the surface and the surfactant molecules present in the solution. In this arrangement, polar heads of the surfactant molecules are in contact with water, while the nonpolar chains below form an organic core into which organic molecules can be dissolved [323]. The arrangement of hemimicelles or admicelles is dependent on pH, surfactant concentration and the ionic strength of the solution [324]. Surfactants adsorbed onto solid surfaces have been used for the extraction of multiple compounds. Table 5 illustrates some recent applications.
Hydrotropes, which are amphiphilic green solvents, solubilize hydrophobic compounds in the aqueous solutions by means other than micellar solubilization. They typically consist of a benzene-substituted molecule (hydrophobic part) and an ionic group (hydrophilic head). They are similar to surfactants; however, the hydrophobic part is too small to form a micelle through spontaneous self-aggregation [325]. At a particular concentration, which is known as the minimum hydrotrope concentration (MHC), hydrotropes can aggregate. This increases the solubility of hydrophobic compounds in the aqueous phase. Hydrotropes are nontoxic, inexpensive and chemically inert, and, as such, have found applications in the extraction of certain compounds [326]

Bioderived (Agro) Solvents

Bioderived solvents are renewable materials developed to replace dipolar aprotic solvents. They are characterized by low toxicity, renewability, biodegradability and non-flammability. Examples of these biobased solvents include ethyl lactate, 2-methyl tetrahydrofuran, glycerol, ethanol, terpenes and p-cymene. Some of these solvents have been applied for the extraction of various analytes from different matrices. For example, d-limonene from citrus fruit [345,346] can be used for effective extraction of fats and oils [347]. Limonene, first described as a solvent in 2008 by Virot et al. [348], can be used as a replacement for petroleum-based solvents such as n-hexane and toluene in the extraction of some natural compounds [349]. Another example is the extraction of thymol, which is the main monoterpene phenol in thyme essential oil, by using limonene, ethanol and ethyl lactate [350]. Heated water/glycerol mixture was used to extract polyphenols from olive leaves, and the polyphenols yield was comparable to that obtained with ethanol/water mixture [351].

3. Conclusions

Determination of trace analytes in different matrices typically involves various sample preparation steps leading to isolation and concentration of the analytes prior to their final determination. The introduction of novel procedures aiming at the simplification, automation, and minimization of wastes of analytical methods has become inevitable to protect the environment and the analysts. Multiple environmentally friendly sample preparation methodologies have been developed over time, including solid phase extraction techniques, liquid phase microextraction techniques, and using alternative green solvents, such as subcritical water, ionic liquids, supercritical liquids, deep eutectic solvents, surfactants and hydrotropes, and bioderived solvents. As the attention paid to GAC principles is continuously growing, it is expected that the development of novel environmentally friendly extraction techniques will continue in the future.

Funding

Financial support of this research by NSERC and the Government of Egypt is gratefully acknowledged.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Płotka, J.; Tobiszewski, M.; Sulej, A.M.; Kupska, M.; Górecki, T.; Namieśnik, J. Green chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 2013, 1307, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Płotka-Wasylka, J.; Fabjanowicz, M.; Kalinowska, K.; Namieśnik, J. History and Milestones of Green Analytical Chemistry. In Green Analytical Chemistry: Past, Present and Perspectives; Płotka-Wasylka, J., Namieśnik, J., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2019; pp. 1–17. [Google Scholar]
  3. Sánchez, C.; Dessì, P.; Duffy, M.; Lens, P.N.L. OpenTCC: An open source low-cost temperature-control chamber. HardwareX 2020, 7, e00099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Alexovič, M.; Dotsikas, Y.; Bober, P.; Sabo, J. Achievements in robotic automation of solvent extraction and related approaches for bioanalysis of pharmaceuticals. J. Chromatogr. B 2018, 1092, 402–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Abdel-Rehim, M.; Pedersen-Bjergaard, S.; Abdel-Rehim, A.; Lucena, R.; Moein, M.M.; Cárdenas, S.; Miró, M. Microextraction approaches for bioanalytical applications: An overview. J. Chromatogr. A 2019. in print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Alexovič, M.; Horstkotte, B.; Solich, P.; Sabo, J. Automation of static and dynamic non-dispersive liquid phase microextraction. Part 2: Approaches based on impregnated membranes and porous supports. Anal. Chim. Acta 2016, 907, 18–30. [Google Scholar]
  7. Tobiszewski, M.; Mechlińska, A.; Namieśnik, J. Green analytical chemistry—Theory and practice. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 2869–2878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Płotka-Wasylka, J.; Gałuszka, A.; Namieśnik, J. Green Analytical Chemistry: Summary of Existing Knowledge and Future Trends. In Green Analytical Chemistry: Past, Present and Perspectives; Płotka-Wasylka, J., Namieśnik, J., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2019; pp. 431–449. [Google Scholar]
  9. Anastas, P.T.; Warner, J.C. Green Chemistry: Theory and Practice; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1998; p. 30. [Google Scholar]
  10. Marcinkowska, R.; Namieśnik, J.; Tobiszewski, M. Green and equitable analytical chemistry. Curr. Opin. Green Sustain. Chem. 2019, 19, 19–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tobiszewski, M.; Marć, M.; Gałuszka, A.; Namieśnik, J. Green Chemistry Metrics with Special Reference to Green Analytical Chemistry. Molecules 2015, 20, 10928–10946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Płotka-Wasylka, J.; Kurowska-Susdorf, A.; Sajid, M.; de la Guardia, M.; Namieśnik, J.; Tobiszewski, M. Green Chemistry in Higher Education: State of the Art, Challenges, and Future Trends. ChemSusChem 2018, 11, 2845–2858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Koel, M.; Kaljurand, M. Green Analytical Chemistry, 2nd ed.; Royal Society of Chemistry: Hong Kong, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  14. Aly, A.A.; Górecki, T. Green Chromatography and Related Techniques. In Green Analytical Chemistry: Past, Present and Perspectives; Płotka-Wasylka, J., Namieśnik, J., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2019; pp. 241–298. [Google Scholar]
  15. de la Guardia, M.; Garrigues, S. Handbook of Green Analytical Chemistry; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  16. Wang, Y.-L.; You, L.-Q.; Mei, Y.-W.; Liu, J.-P.; He, L.-J. Benzyl Functionalized Ionic Liquid as New Extraction Solvent of Dispersive Liquid-liquid Microextraction for Enrichment of Organophosphorus Pesticides and Aromatic Compounds. Chin. J. Anal. Chem. 2016, 44, 942–949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bojko, B.; Pawliszyn, J. The benefits of using solid-phase microextraction as a greener sample preparation technique. Bioanalysis 2012, 4, 1263–1265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Tobiszewski, M.; Mechlińska, A.; Zygmunt, B.; Namieśnik, J. Green analytical chemistry in sample preparation for determination of trace organic pollutants. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2009, 28, 943–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Armenta, S.; Garrigues, S.; de la Guardia, M. Green Analytical Chemistry. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2008, 27, 497–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jakubowska, N.; Polkowska, Z.; Namieśnik, J.; Przyjazny, A. Analytical Applications of Membrane Extraction for Biomedical and Environmental Liquid Sample Preparation. Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2005, 35, 217–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Namieśnik, J. Green analytical chemistry—Some remarks. J. Sep. Sci. 2001, 24, 151–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Tobiszewski, M.; Namieśnik, J. Direct chromatographic methods in the context of green analytical chemistry. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2012, 35, 67–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Grob, K.; Grob, K., Jr. On-column injection on to glass capillary columns. J. Chromatogr. A 1978, 151, 311–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Grob, K. Further development of direct aqueous injection with electron-capture detection in gas chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 1984, 299, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kubinec, R.; Adamuscin, J.; Jurdakova, H.; Foltin, M.; Ostrovsky, I.; Kraus, A.; Sojak, L. Gas chromatographic determination of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes using flame ionization detector in water samples with direct aqueous injection up to 250 µL. J. Chromatogr. A 2005, 1084, 90–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Aeppli, C.; Berg, M.; Hofstetter, T.B.; Kipfer, R.; Schwarzenbach, R.P. Simultaneous quantification of polar and non-polar volatile organic compounds in water samples by direct aqueous injection-gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A 2008, 1181, 116–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yu, B.; Song, Y.; Han, L.; Yu, H.; Liu, Y.; Liu, H. Optimizations of packed sorbent and inlet temperature for large volume-direct aqueous injection-gas chromatography to determine high boiling volatile organic compounds in water. J. Chromatogr. A 2014, 1356, 221–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Eldin, A.B.; Ismaiel, O.A.; Hassan, W.E.; Shalaby, A.A. Green analytical chemistry: Opportunities for pharmaceutical quality control. J. Anal. Chem. 2016, 71, 861–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Musshoff, F.; Lachenmeier, D.W.; Kroener, L.; Madea, B. Automated headspace solid-phase dynamic extraction for the determination of amphetamines and synthetic designer drugs in hair samples. J. Chromatogr. A 2002, 958, 231–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Edinboro, L.E.; Backer, R.C.; Poklis, A. Direct Analysis of Opiates in Urine by Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry. J. Anal. Toxicol. 2005, 29, 704–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Pozo, O.J.; Van Eenoo, P.; Van Thuyne, W.; Deventer, K.; Delbeke, F.T. Direct quantification of steroid glucuronides in human urine by liquid chromatography–electrospray tandem mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A 2008, 1183, 108–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Hennion, M.-C. Solid-phase extraction: Method development, sorbents, and coupling with liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 1999, 856, 3–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Płotka-Wasylka, J.; Marć, M.; Szczepańska, N.; Namieśnik, J. New Polymeric Materials for Solid Phase Extraction. Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2017, 47, 373–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Płotka-Wasylka, J.; Szczepańska, N.; de la Guardia, M.; Namieśnik, J. Modern trends in solid phase extraction: New sorbent media. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2016, 77, 23–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Dogan, A.; Płotka-Wasylka, J.; Kempińska-Kupczyk, D.; Namieśnik, J.; Kot-Wasik, A. Detection, identification and determination of chiral pharmaceutical residues in wastewater: Problems and challenges. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2020, 122, 115710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kalinowska, K.; Lenartowicz, P.; Namieśnik, J.; Marć, M. Analytical procedures for short chain chlorinated paraffins determination—How to make them greener? Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 671, 309–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Andrade-Eiroa, A.; Canle, M.; Leroy-Cancellieri, V.; Cerdà, V. Solid-phase extraction of organic compounds: A critical review (Part I). TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2016, 80, 641–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Andrade-Eiroa, A.; Canle, M.; Leroy-Cancellieri, V.; Cerdà, V. Solid-phase extraction of organic compounds: A critical review (Part II). TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2016, 80, 655–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Płotka-Wasylka, J.; Szczepańska, N.; de la Guardia, M.; Namieśnik, J. Miniaturized solid-phase extraction techniques. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2015, 73, 19–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Bagnati, R.; Castelli, M.G.; Airoldi, L.; Oriundi, M.P.; Ubaldi, A.; Fanelli, R. Analysis of diethylstilbestrol, dienestrol and hexestrol in biological samples by immunoaffinity extraction and gas chromatography-negative-ion chemical ionization mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. B Biomed. Sci. Appl. 1990, 527, 267–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Pou, K.; Ong, H.; Adam, A.; Lamothe, P.; Delahaut, P. Combined immunoextraction approach coupled to a chemiluminescence enzyme immunoassay for the determination of trace levels of salbutamol and clenbuterol in tissue samples. Analyst 1994, 119, 2659–2662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Silva, M.M.; Arruda, M.A.Z.; Krug, F.J.; Oliveira, P.V.; Queiroz, Z.F.; Gallego, M.; Valcárcel, M. On-line separation and preconcentration of cadmium, lead and nickel in a fullerene (C60) minicolumn coupled to flow injection tungsten coil atomic absorption spectrometry1Presented at the Flow Analysis VII Conference held in Piracicaba, Brazil, 23–26 August 1997.1. Anal. Chim. Acta 1998, 368, 255–263. [Google Scholar]
  43. Rivasseau, C.; Hennion, M.-C. Potential of immunoextraction coupled to analytical and bioanalytical methods (liquid chromatography, ELISA kit and phosphatase inhibition test) for an improved environmental monitoring of cyanobacterial toxins. Anal. Chim. Acta 1999, 399, 75–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Baena, J.R.; Gallego, M.; Valcárcel, M. Group speciation of metal dithiocarbamates by sorption on C60 fullerene. Analyst 2000, 125, 1495–1499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Watanabe, E.; Yoshimura, Y.; Yuasa, Y.; Nakazawa, H. Immunoaffinity column clean-up for the determination of imazalil in citrus fruits. Anal. Chim. Acta 2001, 433, 199–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Yu, Y.Q.; Gilar, M.; Kaska, J.; Gebler, J.C. A rapid sample preparation method for mass spectrometric characterization of N-linked glycans. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2005, 19, 2331–2336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kaware, M.; Bronshtein, A.; Safi, J.; Van Emon, J.M.; Chuang, J.C.; Hock, B.; Kramer, K.; Altstein, M. Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) and Sol−Gel-Based Immunoaffinity Purification (IAP) of the Pyrethroid Bioallethrin in Food and Environmental Samples. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006, 54, 6482–6492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Sheibani, A.; Tabrizchi, M.; Ghaziaskar, H.S. Determination of aflatoxins B1 and B2 using ion mobility spectrometry. Talanta 2008, 75, 233–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Turrell, E.; Stobo, L.; Lacaze, J.-P.; Piletsky, S.; Piletska, E. Optimization of Hydrophilic Interaction Liquid Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry and Development of Solid-Phase Extraction for the Determination of Paralytic Shellfish Poisoning Toxins. J. AOAC Int. 2008, 91, 1372–1386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. Kim, H.S.; Siluk, D.; Wainer, I.W. Quantitative determination of fenoterol and fenoterol derivatives in rat plasma using on-line immunoextraction and liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A 2009, 1216, 3526–3532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Jiménez-Soto, J.M.; Cárdenas, S.; Valcárcel, M. Evaluation of carbon nanocones/disks as sorbent material for solid-phase extraction. J. Chromatogr. A 2009, 1216, 5626–5633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Yang, L.; Vail, M.A.; Dadson, A.; Lee, M.L.; Asplund, M.C.; Linford, M.R. Functionalization of Deuterium- and Hydrogen-Terminated Diamond Particles with Mono- and Multilayers using Di-tert-Amyl Peroxide and Their Use in Solid Phase Extraction. Chem. Mater. 2009, 21, 4359–4365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Soylak, M.; Unsal, Y.E. Use of multiwalled carbon nanotube disks for the SPE of some heavy metals as 8-hydroxquinoline complexes. J. AOAC Int. 2011, 94, 1297–1303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Olkowska, E.; Polkowska, Z.; Namieśnik, J. A solid phase extraction–ion chromatography with conductivity detection procedure for determining cationic surfactants in surface water samples. Talanta 2013, 116, 210–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Esteve-Turrillas, F.A.; Mercader, J.V.; Agulló, C.; Abad-Somovilla, A.; Abad-Fuentes, A. Development of immunoaffinity columns for pyraclostrobin extraction from fruit juices and analysis by liquid chromatography with UV detection. J. Chromatogr. A 2011, 1218, 4902–4909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Boonjob, W.; Miró, M.; Segundo, M.A.; Cerdà, V. Flow-through Dispersed Carbon Nanofiber-Based Microsolid-Phase Extraction Coupled to Liquid Chromatography for Automatic Determination of Trace Levels of Priority Environmental Pollutants. Anal. Chem. 2011, 83, 5237–5244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Radosław Czernych, J.J.H. Agata Kot-Wasik, Jacek Namieśnik, Development and validation of SPE-HPLC-MS/MS method for determining cyclophosphamide in surface waters. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2014, 23, 1537–1545. [Google Scholar]
  58. Dubiella-Jackowska, A.; Polkowska, Z.; Dariusz, L.; Pasławski, P.; Staszek, W.; Namieśnik, J. Estimation of platinum in environmental water samples with solid phase extraction technique using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Open Chem. 2009, 7, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Zhou, W.; Wang, P.G.; Krynitsky, A.J.; Rader, J.I. Rapid and simultaneous determination of hexapeptides (Ac-EEMQRR-amide and H2N-EEMQRR-amide) in anti-wrinkle cosmetics by hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography–solid phase extraction preparation and hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A 2011, 1218, 7956–7963. [Google Scholar]
  60. Jiménez-Soto, J.M.; Cárdenas, S.; Valcárcel, M. Evaluation of single-walled carbon nanohorns as sorbent in dispersive micro solid-phase extraction. Anal. Chim. Acta 2012, 714, 76–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Van Damme, T.; Zhang, Y.; Lynen, F.; Sandra, P. Determination of cyclic guanosine- and cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cGMP and cAMP) in human plasma and animal tissues by solid phase extraction on silica and liquid chromatography–triple quadrupole mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. B 2012, 909, 14–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Polo-Luque, M.L.; Simonet, B.M.; Valcárcel, M. Solid-phase extraction of nitrophenols in water by using a combination of carbon nanotubes with an ionic liquid coupled in-line to CE. Electrophoresis 2013, 34, 304–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Cai, B.-D.; Zhu, J.-X.; Shi, Z.-G.; Yuan, B.-F.; Feng, Y.-Q. A simple sample preparation approach based on hydrophilic solid-phase extraction coupled with liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry for determination of endogenous cytokinins. J. Chromatogr. B 2013, 942, 31–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Van Damme, T.; Lachová, M.; Lynen, F.; Szucs, R.; Sandra, P. Solid-phase extraction based on hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography with acetone as eluent for eliminating matrix effects in the analysis of biological fluids by LC-MS. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2014, 406, 401–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Li, X.; Liu, Y.; Shen, A.; Wang, C.; Yan, J.; Zhao, W.; Liang, X. Efficient purification of active bufadienolides by a class separation method based on hydrophilic solid-phase extraction and reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2014, 97, 54–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Pilipczuk, T.; Dawidowska, N.; Kusznierewicz, B.; Namieśnik, J.; Bartoszek, A. Simultaneous Determination of Indolic Compounds in Plant Extracts by Solid-Phase Extraction and High-Performance Liquid Chromatography with UV and Fluorescence Detection. Food Anal. Methods 2015, 8, 2169–2177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Armenta, S.; de la Guardia, M.; Abad-Fuentes, A.; Abad-Somovilla, A.; Esteve-Turrillas, F.A. Off-line coupling of multidimensional immunoaffinity chromatography and ion mobility spectrometry: A promising partnership. J. Chromatogr. A 2015, 1426, 110–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Shen, Q.; Yang, Q.; Cheung, H.-Y. Hydrophilic interaction chromatography based solid-phase extraction and MALDI TOF mass spectrometry for revealing the influence of Pseudomonas fluorescens on phospholipids in salmon fillet. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2015, 407, 1475–1484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Lindberg, R.H.; Fedorova, G.; Blum, K.M.; Pulit-Prociak, J.; Gillman, A.; Järhult, J.; Appelblad, P.; Söderström, H. Online solid phase extraction liquid chromatography using bonded zwitterionic stationary phases and tandem mass spectrometry for rapid environmental trace analysis of highly polar hydrophilic compounds—Application for the antiviral drug Zanamivir. Talanta 2015, 141, 164–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Wang, Y.; Ji, S.; Zhang, F.; Zhang, F.; Yang, B.; Liang, X. A polyvinyl alcohol-functionalized sorbent for extraction and determination of aminoglycoside antibiotics in honey. J. Chromatogr. A 2015, 1403, 32–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Shi, Z.; Li, Q.; Xu, D.; Huai, Q.; Zhang, H. Graphene-based pipette tip solid-phase extraction with ultra-high performance liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry for the analysis of carbamate pesticide residues in fruit juice. J. Sep. Sci. 2016, 39, 4391–4397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Wu, L.; Liu, F.; Wang, G.; Guo, Z.; Zhao, J. Bifunctional monomer molecularly imprinted polymers based on the surface of multiwalled carbon nanotubes for solid-phase extraction of tartrazine from drinks. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 464–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Anastassiades, M.; Lehotay, S.J.; Štajnbaher, D.; Schenck, F.J. Fast and easy multiresidue method employing acetonitrile extraction/partitioning and “dispersive solid-phase extraction” for the determination of pesticide residues in produce. J. AOAC Int. 2003, 86, 412–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Jose, A.; Broekaert, C. Harris: Quantitative chemical analysis. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2015, 407, 8943–8944. [Google Scholar]
  75. Wilkowska, A.; Biziuk, M. Determination of pesticide residues in food matrices using the QuEChERS methodology. Food Chem. 2011, 125, 803–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. González Curbelo, M.Á.; Socas-Rodríguez, B.; Herrera-Herrera, A.; González-Sálamo, J.; Hernández-Borges, J.; Rodríguez-Delgado, M.Á. Evolution and applications of the QuEChERS method. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2015, 71, 169–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Garcia, C.V.; Gotah, A. Application of QuEChERS for Determining Xenobiotics in Foods of Animal Origin. J. Anal. Methods Chem. 2017, 2017, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  78. Zhang, C.; Deng, Y.; Zheng, J.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, L.; Liao, C.; Su, L.; Zhou, Y.; Gong, D.; Chen, L.; et al. The application of the QuEChERS methodology in the determination of antibiotics in food: A review. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2019, 118, 517–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Koesukwiwat, U.; Sanguankaew, K.; Leepipatpiboon, N. Evaluation of a modified QuEChERS method for analysis of mycotoxins in rice. Food Chem. 2014, 153, 44–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Lombardo-Agüí, M.; García-Campaña, A.M.; Cruces-Blanco, C.; Gámiz-Gracia, L. Determination of quinolones in fish by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection using QuEChERS as sample treatment. Food Control 2015, 50, 864–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Omar, M.M.A.; Elbashir, A.A.; Schmitz, O.J. Determination of acrylamide in Sudanese food by high performance liquid chromatography coupled with LTQ Orbitrap mass spectrometry. Food Chem. 2015, 176, 342–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Parab, S.R.; Amritkar, P.N. Development and Validation of a Procedure for Determination of Sulfonamide Residues in Pasteurized Milk Using Modified QuEChERS Method and Liquid Chromatography/Tandem Mass Spectrometry. J. AOAC Int. 2012, 95, 1528–1533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Bargańska, Z.; Ślebioda, M.; Namieśnik, J. Determination of Pesticide Residues in Honeybees using Modified QUEChERS Sample Work-Up and Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry. Molecules 2014, 19, 2911–2924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Garrido Frenich, A.; Martínez Vidal, J.L.; Pastor-Montoro, E.; Romero-González, R. High-throughput determination of pesticide residues in food commodities by use of ultra-performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2008, 390, 947–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Stocka, J.; Biziuk, M.; Namieśnik, J. Analysis of pesticide residue in fruits and vegetables using analytical protocol based on application of the QuEChERS technique and GC-ECD system. Int. J. Glob. Environ. Issues 2016, 15, 136–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Plössl, F.; Giera, M.; Bracher, F. Multiresidue analytical method using dispersive solid-phase extraction and gas chromatography/ion trap mass spectrometry to determine pharmaceuticals in whole blood. J. Chromatogr. A 2006, 1135, 19–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Plassmann, M.M.; Schmidt, M.; Brack, W.; Krauss, M. Detecting a wide range of environmental contaminants in human blood samples—Combining QuEChERS with LC-MS and GC-MS methods. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2015, 407, 7047–7054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Dulaurent, S.; El Balkhi, S.; Poncelet, L.; Gaulier, J.-M.; Marquet, P.; Saint-Marcoux, F. QuEChERS sample preparation prior to LC-MS/MS determination of opiates, amphetamines, and cocaine metabolites in whole blood. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2016, 408, 1467–1474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Dybowski, M.P.; Dawidowicz, A.L. Application of the QuEChERS procedure for analysis of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol and its metabolites in authentic whole blood samples by GC–MS/MS. Forensic Toxicol. 2018, 36, 415–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  90. Kataoka, H.; Lord, H.L.; Pawliszyn, J. Applications of solid-phase microextraction in food analysis. J. Chromatogr. A 2000, 880, 35–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Wardencki, W.; Michulec, M.; Curyło, J. A review of theoretical and practical aspects of solid-phase microextraction in food analysis. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2004, 39, 703–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Kumar, A.; Malik, A.K.; Tewary, D.K.; Singh, B. A review on development of solid phase microextraction fibers by sol–gel methods and their applications. Anal. Chim. Acta 2008, 610, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Hamidi, S.; Alipour-Ghorbani, N.; Hamidi, A. Solid Phase Microextraction Techniques in Determination of Biomarkers. Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2018, 48, 239–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Owczarek, K.; Szczepańska, N.; Płotka-Wasylka, J.; Namieśnik, J. New Achievements in the Field of Extraction of Trace Analytes from Samples Characterized by Complex Composition of the Matrix. In Green Analytical Chemistry: Past, Present and Perspectives; Płotka-Wasylka, J., Namieśnik, J., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2019; pp. 103–150. [Google Scholar]
  95. Sajid, M.; Khaled Nazal, M.; Rutkowska, M.; Szczepańska, N.; Namieśnik, J.; Płotka-Wasylka, J. Solid Phase Microextraction: Apparatus, Sorbent Materials, and Application. Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2019, 49, 271–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Fabjanowicz, M.; Kalinowska, K.; Namieśnik, J.; Płotka-Wasylka, J. Evaluation of Green Sample Preparation Techniques for Organic Compounds. Curr. Green Chem. 2018, 5, 168–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Souza-Silva, É.A.; Jiang, R.; Rodríguez-Lafuente, A.; Gionfriddo, E.; Pawliszyn, J. A critical review of the state of the art of solid-phase microextraction of complex matrices I. Environmental analysis. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2015, 71, 224–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Bojko, B.; Reyes-Garcés, N.; Bessonneau, V.; Goryński, K.; Mousavi, F.; Souza Silva, E.A.; Pawliszyn, J. Solid-phase microextraction in metabolomics. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2014, 61, 168–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Souza-Silva, É.A.; Gionfriddo, E.; Pawliszyn, J. A critical review of the state of the art of solid-phase microextraction of complex matrices II. Food analysis. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2015, 71, 236–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Souza-Silva, É.A.; Reyes-Garcés, N.; Gómez-Ríos, G.A.; Boyacı, E.; Bojko, B.; Pawliszyn, J. A critical review of the state of the art of solid-phase microextraction of complex matrices III. Bioanalytical and clinical applications. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2015, 71, 249–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Piri-Moghadam, H.; Ahmadi, F.; Pawliszyn, J. A critical review of solid phase microextraction for analysis of water samples. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2016, 85, 133–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Xu, C.-H.; Chen, G.-S.; Xiong, Z.-H.; Fan, Y.-X.; Wang, X.-C.; Liu, Y. Applications of solid-phase microextraction in food analysis. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2016, 80, 12–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Zhang, Q.-H.; Zhou, L.-D.; Chen, H.; Wang, C.-Z.; Xia, Z.-N.; Yuan, C.-S. Solid-phase microextraction technology for in vitro and in vivo metabolite analysis. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2016, 80, 57–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  104. Moein, M.M.; Said, R.; Bassyouni, F.; Abdel-Rehim, M. Solid Phase Microextraction and Related Techniques for Drugs in Biological Samples. J. Anal. Methods Chem. 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Adahchour, M.; Beens, J.; Vreuls, R.J.J.; Batenburg, A.M.; Rosing, E.A.E.; Brinkman, U.A.T. Application of solid-phase micro-extraction and comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography (GC × GC) for flavour analysis. Chromatographia 2002, 55, 361–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Lavine, B.K.; Mirjankar, N.; LeBouf, R.; Rossner, A. Prediction of mold contamination from microbial volatile organic compound profiles using solid phase microextraction and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Microchem. J. 2012, 103, 37–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Penton, Z.E. Sample preparation for gas chromatography with solid-phase extraction and solid-phase microextraction. Adv. Chromatogr. 1997, 37, 205. [Google Scholar]
  108. Cha, D.; Liu, M.; Zeng, Z.; Cheng, D.e.; Zhan, G. Analysis of fatty acids in lung tissues using gas chromatography–mass spectrometry preceded by derivatization-solid-phase microextraction with a novel fiber. Anal. Chim. Acta 2006, 572, 47–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Camarasu, C.; Mezei, M.; Szabo, A. Headspace solid phase micro-extraction method optimization for residual solvent analysis. Acta Pharm. Hung. 1999, 69, 77–84. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  110. Camarasu, C.C. Headspace SPME method development for the analysis of volatile polar residual solvents by GC-MS. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2000, 23, 197–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Zhang, Z.; Pawliszyn, J. Quantitative Extraction Using an Internally Cooled Solid Phase Microextraction Device. Anal. Chem. 1995, 67, 34–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Carasek, E.; Cudjoe, E.; Pawliszyn, J. Fast and sensitive method to determine chloroanisoles in cork using an internally cooled solid-phase microextraction fiber. J. Chromatogr. A 2007, 1138, 10–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Gokbulut, I.; Karabulut, I. SPME–GC–MS detection of volatile compounds in apricot varieties. Food Chem. 2012, 132, 1098–1102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Wang, X.; Zhu, L.; Han, Y.; Xu, L.; Jin, J.; Cai, Y.; Wang, H. Analysis of volatile compounds between raw and cooked beef by HS-SPME–GC–MS. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2018, 42, e13503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Spietelun, A.; Marcinkowski, Ł.; Kloskowski, A.; Namieśnik, J. Determination of volatile organic compounds in water samples using membrane-solid phase microextraction (M-SPME) (headspace version). Analyst 2013, 138, 5099–5106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Feng, D.; Liu, L.; Zhao, L.; Zhou, Q.; Tan, T. Determination of Volatile Nitrosamines in Latex Products by HS-SPME–GC–MS. Chromatographia 2011, 74, 817–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Li, J.; Xu, H. A novel polyaniline/polypyrrole/graphene oxide fiber for the determination of volatile organic compounds in headspace gas of lung cell lines. Talanta 2017, 167, 623–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Liu, F.; Xu, H. Development of a novel polystyrene/metal-organic framework-199 electrospun nanofiber adsorbent for thin film microextraction of aldehydes in human urine. Talanta 2017, 162, 261–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Beitlich, N.; Koelling-Speer, I.; Oelschlaegel, S.; Speer, K. Differentiation of Manuka Honey from Kanuka Honey and from Jelly Bush Honey using HS-SPME-GC/MS and UHPLC-PDA-MS/MS. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014, 62, 6435–6444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Yang, Z.; Mao, H.; Long, C.; Sun, C.; Guo, Z. Rapid determination of volatile composition from Polygala furcata Royle by MAE–HS-SPME followed by GC–MS. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2010, 230, 779–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  121. Verzera, A.; Dima, G.; Tripodi, G.; Ziino, M.; Lanza, C.M.; Mazzaglia, A. Fast Quantitative Determination of Aroma Volatile Constituents in Melon Fruits by Headspace–Solid-Phase Microextraction and Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry. Food Anal. Methods 2011, 4, 141–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Yilmaztekin, M. Analysis of Volatile Components of Cape Gooseberry (Physalis peruviana L.) Grown in Turkey by HS-SPME and GC-MS. Sci. World J. 2014, 2014, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  123. Cheng, H.; Chen, J.; Li, X.; Pan, J.; Xue, S.J.; Liu, D.; Ye, X. Differentiation of the volatile profiles of Chinese bayberry cultivars during storage by HS-SPME–GC/MS combined with principal component analysis. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2015, 100, 59–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Ye, L.; Yang, C.; Li, W.; Hao, J.; Sun, M.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, Z. Evaluation of volatile compounds from Chinese dwarf cherry (Cerasus humilis (Bge.) Sok.) germplasms by headspace solid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. Food Chem. 2017, 217, 389–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Cincotta, F.; Verzera, A.; Tripodi, G.; Condurso, C. Volatile emerging contaminants in melon fruits, analysed by HS-SPME-GC-MS. Food Addit. Contam. Part 2018, 35, 512–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Ma, C.; Qu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Qiu, B.; Wang, Y.; Chen, X. Determination of nerolidol in teas using headspace solid phase microextraction–gas chromatography. Food Chem. 2014, 152, 285–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Campillo, N.; Peñalver, R.; Hernández-Córdoba, M. Pesticide analysis in herbal infusions by solid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography with atomic emission detection. Talanta 2007, 71, 1417–1423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Campillo, N.; Peñalver, R.; Aguinaga, N.; Hernández-Córdoba, M. Solid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography with atomic emission detection for multiresidue determination of pesticides in honey. Anal. Chim. Acta 2006, 562, 9–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Campillo, N.; Peñalver, R.; Hernández-Córdoba, M. Solid-phase microextraction combined with gas chromatography and atomic emission detection for the determination of cyclopentadienylmanganese tricarbonyl and (methylcyclopentadienyl) manganese tricarbonyl in soils and seawaters. J. Chromatogr. A 2007, 1173, 139–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Carpinteiro, J.; Rodríguez, I.; Cela, R. Applicability of solid-phase microextraction combined with gas chromatography atomic emission detection (GC-MIP AED) for the determination of butyltin compounds in sediment samples. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2004, 380, 853–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Setyaningsih, W.; Majchrzak, T.; Dymerski, T.; Namieśnik, J.; Palma, M. Key-Marker Volatile Compounds in Aromatic Rice (Oryza sativa) Grains: An HS-SPME Extraction Method Combined with GC × GC-TOFMS. Molecules 2019, 24, 4180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  132. Papageorgiou, M.; Lambropoulou, D.; Morrison, C.; Namieśnik, J.; Płotka-Wasylka, J. Direct solid phase microextraction combined with gas chromatography—Mass spectrometry for the determination of biogenic amines in wine. Talanta 2018, 183, 276–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  133. Garwolińska, D.; Hewelt-Belka, W.; Namieśnik, J.; Kot-Wasik, A. Rapid Characterization of the Human Breast Milk Lipidome Using a Solid-Phase Microextraction and Liquid Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry-Based Approach. J. Proteome Res. 2017, 16, 3200–3208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Sulej-Suchomska, A.M.; Polkowska, Z.; Chmiel, T.; Dymerski, T.M.; Kokot, Z.J.; Namieśnik, J. Solid phase microextraction–comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography–time-of-flight mass spectrometry: A new tool for determining PAHs in airport runoff water samples. Anal. Methods 2016, 8, 4509–4520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  135. Sulej-Suchomska, A.M.; Polkowska, Z.; Kokot, Z.J.; de la Guardia, M.; Namieśnik, J. Determination of antifreeze substances in the airport runoff waters by solid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry method. Microchem. J. 2016, 126, 466–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Marcinkowski, Ł.; Kloskowski, A.; Spietelun, A.; Namieśnik, J. Evaluation of polycaprolactone as a new sorbent coating for determination of polar organic compounds in water samples using membrane–SPME. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2015, 407, 1205–1215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  137. Woźniakiewicz, M.; Wietecha-Posłuszny, R.; Moos, A.; Wieczorek, M.; Knihnicki, P.; Kościelniak, P. Development of microextraction by packed sorbent for toxicological analysis of tricyclic antidepressant drugs in human oral fluid. J. Chromatogr. A 2014, 1337, 9–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Locatelli, M.; Ferrone, V.; Cifelli, R.; Barbacane, R.C.; Carlucci, G. Microextraction by packed sorbent and high performance liquid chromatography determination of seven non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in human plasma and urine. J. Chromatogr. A 2014, 1367, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Martínez-Moral, M.P.; Tena, M.T. Use of microextraction by packed sorbents following selective pressurised liquid extraction for the determination of brominated diphenyl ethers in sewage sludge by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A 2014, 1364, 28–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Du, W.; Lei, C.; Zhang, S.; Bai, G.; Zhou, H.; Sun, M.; Fu, Q.; Chang, C. Determination of clenbuterol from pork samples using surface molecularly imprinted polymers as the selective sorbents for microextraction in packed syringe. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2014, 91, 160–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Fernández, P.; González, M.; Regenjo, M.; Ares, A.M.; Fernández, A.M.; Lorenzo, R.A.; Carro, A.M. Analysis of drugs of abuse in human plasma using microextraction by packed sorbents and ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 2017, 1485, 8–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Moeller, M.R.; Fey, P.; Wennig, R. Simultaneous determination of drugs of abuse (opiates, cocaine and amphetamine) in human hair by GC/MS and its application to a methadone treatment program. Forensic Sci. Int. 1993, 63, 185–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Silva, C.; Cavaco, C.; Perestrelo, R.; Pereira, J.; Câmara, J. Microextraction by Packed Sorbent (MEPS) and Solid-Phase Microextraction (SPME) as Sample Preparation Procedures for the Metabolomic Profiling of Urine. Metabolites 2014, 4, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Gonçalves, J.L.; Alves, V.L.; Conceição, C.J.F.; Teixeira, H.M.; Câmara, J.S. Development of MEPS–UHPLC/PDA methodology for the quantification of clozapine, risperidone and their major active metabolites in human urine. Microchem. J. 2015, 123, 90–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Benet, I.; Guàrdia, M.D.; Ibañez, C.; Solà, J.; Arnau, J.; Roura, E. Analysis of SPME or SBSE extracted volatile compounds from cooked cured pork ham differing in intramuscular fat profiles. Lwt Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 60, 393–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  146. Jakubowska, N.; Henkelmann, B.; Schramm, K.-W.; Namiesnik, J. Optimization of a Novel Procedure for Determination of VOCs in Water and Human Urine Samples Based on SBSE Coupled with TD-GC-HRMS. J. Chromatogr. Sci. 2009, 47, 689–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  147. Ochiai, N.; Sasamoto, K.; Kanda, H.; Pfannkoch, E. Sequential stir bar sorptive extraction for uniform enrichment of trace amounts of organic pollutants in water samples. J. Chromatogr. A 2008, 1200, 72–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Benet, I.; Ibañez, C.; Guàrdia, M.D.; Solà, J.; Arnau, J.; Roura, E. Optimisation of stir-bar sorptive extraction (SBSE), targeting medium and long-chain free fatty acids in cooked ham exudates. Food Chem. 2015, 185, 75–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Tienpont, B.; David, F.; Benijts, T.; Sandra, P. Stir bar sorptive extraction-thermal desorption-capillary GC–MS for profiling and target component analysis of pharmaceutical drugs in urine. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2003, 32, 569–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Bicchi, C.; Iori, C.; Rubiolo, P.; Sandra, P. Headspace Sorptive Extraction (HSSE), Stir Bar Sorptive Extraction (SBSE), and Solid Phase Microextraction (SPME) Applied to the Analysis of Roasted Arabica Coffee and Coffee Brew. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 50, 449–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  151. Montero, L.; Popp, P.; Paschke, A.; Pawliszyn, J. Polydimethylsiloxane rod extraction, a novel technique for the determination of organic micropollutants in water samples by thermal desorption–capillary gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A 2004, 1025, 17–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Benanou, D.; Acobas, F.; De Roubin, M.R. Optimization of stir bar sorptive extraction applied to the determination of odorous compounds in drinking water. Water Sci. Technol. 2004, 49, 161–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Ochiai, N.; Sasamoto, K.; David, F.; Sandra, P. Solvent-assisted stir bar sorptive extraction by using swollen polydimethylsiloxane for enhanced recovery of polar solutes in aqueous samples: Application to aroma compounds in beer and pesticides in wine. J. Chromatogr. A 2016, 1455, 45–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  154. Lin, S.; Gan, N.; Zhang, J.; Qiao, L.; Chen, Y.; Cao, Y. Aptamer-functionalized stir bar sorptive extraction coupled with gas chromatography–mass spectrometry for selective enrichment and determination of polychlorinated biphenyls in fish samples. Talanta 2016, 149, 266–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Wang, H.; Campiglia, A.D. Determination of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Drinking Water Samples by Solid-Phase Nanoextraction and High-Performance Liquid Chromatography. Anal. Chem. 2008, 80, 8202–8209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Wilson, W.B.; Campiglia, A.D. Determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons with molecular weight 302 in water samples by solid-phase nano-extraction and laser excited time-resolved shpol’ skii spectroscopy. Analyst 2011, 136, 3366–3374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Piramoon, S.; Aberoomand Azar, P.; Saber Tehrani, M.; Mohammadiazar, S.; Tavassoli, A. Solid-phase nanoextraction of polychlorinated biphenyls in water and their determination by gas chromatography with electron capture detector. J. Sep. Sci. 2017, 40, 449–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Prosen, H. Applications of liquid-phase microextraction in the sample preparation of environmental solid samples. Molecules 2014, 19, 6776–6808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  159. Pakade, Y.B.; Tewary, D.K. Development and applications of single-drop microextraction for pesticide residue analysis: A review. J. Sep. Sci. 2010, 33, 3683–3691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  160. Xia, L.; Hu, B.; Jiang, Z.; Wu, Y.; Liang, Y. Single-Drop Microextraction Combined with Low-Temperature Electrothermal Vaporization ICPMS for the Determination of Trace Be, Co, Pd, and Cd in Biological Samples. Anal. Chem. 2004, 76, 2910–2915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  161. Pedersen-Bjergaard, S.; Rasmussen, K.E. Liquid−Liquid−Liquid Microextraction for Sample Preparation of Biological Fluids Prior to Capillary Electrophoresis. Anal. Chem. 1999, 71, 2650–2656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Fu, L.; Liu, X.; Hu, J.; Zhao, X.; Wang, H.; Wang, X. Application of dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction for the analysis of triazophos and carbaryl pesticides in water and fruit juice samples. Anal. Chim. Acta 2009, 632, 289–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Pena-Pereira, F.; Duarte, R.M.B.O.; Duarte, A.C. Considerations on the application of miniaturized sample preparation approaches for the analysis of organic compounds in environmental matrices. Cent. Eur. J. Chem. 2012, 10, 433–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Assadi, Y.; Ahmadi, F.; Hossieni, M.R.M. Determination of BTEX Compounds by Dispersive Liquid–Liquid Microextraction with GC–FID. Chromatographia 2010, 71, 1137–1141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Adam, M.; Dobiáš, P.; Pavlíková, P.; Ventura, K. Comparison of solid-phase and single-drop microextractions for headspace analysis of herbal essential oils. Cent. Eur. J. Chem. 2009, 7, 303–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Sanagi, M.M.; Basri, R.S.; Miskam, M.; Ibrahim, W.A.W.; Ahmad, U.K.; Aboul-Enein, H.Y. Headspace Single Drop Microextraction for the Analysis of Fire Accelerants in Fire Debris Samples. Anal. Lett. 2010, 43, 2257–2266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Demeestere, K.; Dewulf, J.; De Witte, B.; Van Langenhove, H. Sample preparation for the analysis of volatile organic compounds in air and water matrices. J. Chromatogr. A 2007, 1153, 130–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Zhao, E.; Han, L.; Jiang, S.; Wang, Q.; Zhou, Z. Application of a single-drop microextraction for the analysis of organophosphorus pesticides in juice. J. Chromatogr. A 2006, 1114, 269–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  169. Ghambarian, M.; Yamini, Y.; Esrafili, A.; Yazdanfar, N.; Moradi, M. A new concept of hollow fiber liquid–liquid–liquid microextraction compatible with gas chromatography based on two immiscible organic solvents. J. Chromatogr. A 2010, 1217, 5652–5658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  170. Farré, M.; Pérez, S.; Gonçalves, C.; Alpendurada, M.F.; Barceló, D. Green analytical chemistry in the determination of organic pollutants in the aquatic environment. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2010, 29, 1347–1362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Asensio-Ramos, M.; Hernández-Borges, J.; González-Hernández, G.; Rodríguez-Delgado, M.Á. Hollow-fiber liquid-phase microextraction for the determination of pesticides and metabolites in soils and water samples using HPLC and fluorescence detection. Electrophoresis 2012, 33, 2184–2191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. dos Santos, M.F.; Yamada, A.; Seulin, S.C.; Leyton, V.; Pasqualucci, C.A.G.; Muñoz, D.R.; Yonamine, M. Liquid-Phase Microextraction and Gas Chromatographic-Mass Spectrometric Analysis of Antidepressants in Vitreous Humor: Study of Matrix Effect of Human and Bovine Vitreous and Saline Solution. J. Anal. Toxicol. 2016, 40, 187–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  173. Saleh, A.; Larsson, E.; Yamini, Y.; Jönsson, J.Å. Hollow fiber liquid phase microextraction as a preconcentration and clean-up step after pressurized hot water extraction for the determination of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in sewage sludge. J. Chromatogr. A 2011, 1218, 1331–1339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Hou, L.; Wen, X.; Tu, C.; Lee, H.K. Combination of liquid-phase microextraction and on-column stacking for trace analysis of amino alcohols by capillary electrophoresis. J. Chromatogr. A 2002, 979, 163–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Leinonen, A.; Vuorensola, K.; Lepola, L.-M.; Kuuranne, T.; Kotiaho, T.; Ketola, R.; Kostiainen, R. Liquid-phase microextraction for sample preparation in analysis of unconjugated anabolic steroids in urine. Anal. Chim. Acta 2006, 559, 166–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Sagristà, E.; Cortés, J.M.; Larsson, E.; Salvadó, V.; Hidalgo, M.; Jönsson, J.Å. Comparison of two extraction methods for the determination of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in sewage sludge by hollow fiber liquid-phase microextraction. J. Sep. Sci. 2012, 35, 2460–2468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Pedersen-Bjergaard, S.; Rasmussen, K.E.; Brekke, A.; Ho, T.S.; Grønhaug Halvorsen, T. Liquid-phase microextraction of basic drugs—Selection of extraction mode based on computer calculated solubility data. J. Sep. Sci. 2005, 28, 1195–1203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Cardador, M.J.; Gallego, M. Optimisation and comparison of several microextraction/methylation methods for determining haloacetic acids in water using gas chromatography. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2010, 396, 1331–1343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  179. Pego, A.M.; Roveri, F.L.; Kuninari, R.Y.; Leyton, V.; Miziara, I.D.; Yonamine, M. Determination of cocaine and its derivatives in hair samples by liquid phase microextraction (LPME) and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Forensic Sci. Int. 2017, 274, 83–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  180. Kawaguchi, M.; Ito, R.; Endo, N.; Okanouchi, N.; Sakui, N.; Saito, K.; Nakazawa, H. Liquid phase microextraction with in situ derivatization for measurement of bisphenol A in river water sample by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A 2006, 1110, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  181. Huang, S.-P.; Huang, S.-D. Determination of organochlorine pesticides in water using solvent cooling assisted dynamic hollow-fiber-supported headspace liquid-phase microextraction. J. Chromatogr. A 2007, 1176, 19–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Lambropoulou, D.A.; Albanis, T.A. Liquid-phase micro-extraction techniques in pesticide residue analysis. J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods 2007, 70, 195–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Menezes, H.C.; Paulo, B.P.; Paiva, M.J.; Cardeal, Z.L. A Simple and Quick Method for the Determination of Pesticides in Environmental Water by HF-LPME-GC/MS. J. Anal. Methods Chem. 2016, 2016, 7058709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  184. Pan, Y.L.; Chen, F.; Zhang, M.Y.; Wang, T.Q.; Xu, Z.C.; Zhang, W.; Chu, Q.C.; Ye, J.N. Sensitive determination of chloroanilines in water samples by hollow fiber-based liquid-phase microextraction prior to capillary electrophoresis with amperometric detection. Electrophoresis 2013, 34, 1241–1248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Lin, Z.; Zhang, J.; Cui, H.; Zhang, L.; Chen, G. Determination of aromatic amines in environmental water sample by hollow fiber-liquid phase microextraction and microemulsion electrokinetic chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 2010, 1217, 4507–4510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Esrafili, A.; Yamini, Y.; Ghambarian, M.; Moradi, M. Analysis of Paraben Preservatives in Cosmetic Samples: Comparison of Three Different Dynamic Hollow Fiber Liquid-Phase Microextraction Methods. Chromatographia 2014, 77, 317–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Tan, L.; Zhao, X.P.; Liu, X.Q.; Ju, H.X.; Li, J.S. Headspace Liquid-Phase Microextraction of Short-Chain Fatty Acids in Plasma, and Gas Chromatography with Flame Ionization Detection. Chromatographia 2005, 62, 305–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Pan, H.-J.; Ho, W.-H. Determination of fungicides in water using liquid phase microextraction and gas chromatography with electron capture detection. Anal. Chim. Acta 2004, 527, 61–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Asensio-Ramos, M.; Ravelo-Pérez, L.; González Curbelo, M.Á.; Hernández-Borges, J. Liquid phase microextraction applications in food analysis. J. Chromatogr. A 2011, 1218, 7415–7437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  190. Campillo, N.; López-García, I.; Hernández-Córdoba, M.; Viñas, P. Food and beverage applications of liquid-phase microextraction. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2018, 109, 116–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Wu, H.-F.; Ku, H.-Y.; Yen, J.-H. Liquid-phase microextraction for rapid AP-MALDI and quantitation of nortriptyline in biological matrices. J. Sep. Sci. 2008, 31, 2288–2294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Chen, Y.-C.; Wu, H.-F. Revolving hollow fiber–liquid phase microextraction coupled to GC/MS using electron ionization for quantification of five aromatic hydrocarbon isomers. J. Sep. Sci. 2009, 32, 3013–3019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Andraščíková, M.; Matisová, E.; Hrouzková, S. Liquid Phase Microextraction Techniques as a Sample Preparation Step for Analysis of Pesticide Residues in Food. Sep. Purif. Rev. 2015, 44, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Rezaee, M.; Assadi, Y.; Milani Hosseini, M.-R.; Aghaee, E.; Ahmadi, F.; Berijani, S. Determination of organic compounds in water using dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction. J. Chromatogr. A 2006, 1116, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Andruch, V.; Burdel, M.; Kocúrová, L.; Šandrejová, J.; Balogh, I.S. Application of ultrasonic irradiation and vortex agitation in solvent microextraction. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2013, 49, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Yiantzi, E.; Psillakis, E.; Tyrovola, K.; Kalogerakis, N. Vortex-assisted liquid–liquid microextraction of octylphenol, nonylphenol and bisphenol-A. Talanta 2010, 80, 2057–2062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Papadopoulou, A.; Román, I.P.; Canals, A.; Tyrovola, K.; Psillakis, E. Fast screening of perfluorooctane sulfonate in water using vortex-assisted liquid–liquid microextraction coupled to liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry. Anal. Chim. Acta 2011, 691, 56–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Farajzadeh, M.A.; Mogaddam, M.R.A. Air-assisted liquid–liquid microextraction method as a novel microextraction technique; Application in extraction and preconcentration of phthalate esters in aqueous sample followed by gas chromatography–flame ionization detection. Anal. Chim. Acta 2012, 728, 31–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  199. Bai, S.; Wang, X.; Hu, F.; Wang, T.; Cheng, P.; Zhou, Z. Determination of phthalate acid esters in soybean milk using dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction coupled with gas chromatography and mass spectrometric detection. Anal. Methods 2014, 6, 7361–7366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Wang, F.; Liu, Y.; Tang, Z.; Hou, M.; Wang, C.; Wang, X.; Wang, Q.; Xiao, Q. Simultaneous determination of 15 phthalate esters in commercial beverages using dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction coupled to gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Anal. Methods 2017, 9, 1912–1919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Quigley, A.; Cummins, W.; Connolly, D. Dispersive Liquid-Liquid Microextraction in the Analysis of Milk and Dairy Products: A Review. J. Chem. 2016, 2016, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  202. Wojnowski, W.; Namieśnik, J.; Płotka-Wasylka, J. Dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction combined with gas chromatography–mass spectrometry for in situ determination of biogenic amines in meat: Estimation of meat’s freshness. Microchem. J. 2019, 145, 130–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Tobiszewski, M.; Bigus, P.; Namieśnik, J. Determination of parent and methylated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in water samples by dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction–two dimensional gas chromatography–time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Anal. Methods 2014, 6, 6678–6687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Di Napoli-Davis, G.; Owens, J.E. Quantitation of tetrabromobisphenol-A from dust sampled on consumer electronics by dispersed liquid-liquid microextraction. Environ. Pollut. 2013, 180, 274–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Zacharis, C.K.; Rotsias, I.; Zachariadis, P.G.; Zotos, A. Dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction for the determination of organochlorine pesticides residues in honey by gas chromatography-electron capture and ion trap mass spectrometric detection. Food Chem. 2012, 134, 1665–1672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Płotka-Wasylka, J.; Simeonov, V.; Namieśnik, J. An in situ derivatization—dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction combined with gas-chromatography—mass spectrometry for determining biogenic amines in home-made fermented alcoholic drinks. J. Chromatogr. A 2016, 1453, 10–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Bigus, P.; Namieśnik, J.; Tobiszewski, M. Implementation of multicriteria decision analysis in design of experiment for dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction optimization for chlorophenols determination. J. Chromatogr. A 2018, 1553, 25–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Bigus, P.; Szalkiewicz, A.; Namiesnik, J.; Tobiszewski, M. Volatile Organohalogen Compounds Determination with Dispersive Liquid-Liquid Microextraction Applying Solvent Lighter than Water. Curr. Anal. Chem. 2017, 13, 262–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Herrera-Herrera, A.; Asensio-Ramos, M.; Hernández-Borges, J.; Ángel Rodríguez-Delgado, M. Dispersive Liquid-Liquid Microextraction for Determination of Organic Analytes. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2010, 29, 728–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Reddy Mudiam, M.K.; Ch, R.; Chauhan, A.; Manickam, N.; Jain, R.; Murthy, R.C. Optimization of UA-DLLME by experimental design methodologies for the simultaneous determination of endosulfan and its metabolites in soil and urine samples by GC–MS. Anal. Methods 2012, 4, 3855–3863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Wang, H.; Yan, H.; Qiao, J. Miniaturized matrix solid-phase dispersion combined with ultrasound-assisted dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction for the determination of three pyrethroids in soil. J. Sep. Sci. 2012, 35, 292–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  212. Asensio-Ramos, M.; Hernández-Borges, J.; Borges-Miquel, T.M.; Rodríguez-Delgado, M.Á. Ionic liquid-dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction for the simultaneous determination of pesticides and metabolites in soils using high-performance liquid chromatography and fluorescence detection. J. Chromatogr. A 2011, 1218, 4808–4816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Çağlar, Y.; Saka, E.T. Ionic liquid based dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction procedure for the spectrophotometric determination of copper using 3-dimethylamino rhodanine as a chelating agent in natural waters. Karbala Int. J. Mod. Sci. 2017, 3, 185–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Fan, C.; Li, N.; Cao, X. Determination of chlorophenols in honey samples using in-situ ionic liquid-dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction as a pretreatment method followed by high-performance liquid chromatography. Food Chem. 2015, 174, 446–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  215. Liu, W.; Quan, J.; Hu, Z. Detection of Organophosphorus Pesticides in Wheat by Ionic Liquid-Based Dispersive Liquid-Liquid Microextraction Combined with HPLC. J. Anal. Methods Chem. 2018, 2018, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Fan, Y.C.; Chen, M.L.; Shen-Tu, C.; Zhu, Y. A ionic liquid for dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction of phenols. J. Anal. Chem. 2009, 64, 1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Aguilera-Herrador, E.; Lucena, R.; Cárdenas, S.; Valcárcel, M. Determination of Trihalomethanes in Water by Ionic Liquid-Based Single Drop Microextraction/Gas Chromatographic/Mass Spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A 2008, 1209, 76–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. Teresa Pena, M.; Casais, C.; Carmen Mejuto, M.; Cela, R. Development of an Ionic Liquid Based Dispersive Liquid–Liquid Microextraction Method for the Analysis of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Water Samples. J. Chromatogr. A 2009, 1216, 6356–6364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  219. Zhou, Q.; Bai, H.; Xie, G.; Xiao, J. Trace Determination of Organophosphorus Pesticides in Environmental Samples by Temperature-controlled Ionic Liquid Dispersive Liquid-phase Microextraction. J. Chromatogr. A 2008, 1188, 148–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  220. Ho, W.S.W.; Wang, B.; Neumuller, T.E.; Roller, J. Supported liquid membranes for removal and recovery of metals from waste waters and process streams. Environ. Prog. 2001, 20, 117–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Knutsson, M.; Nilvé, G.; Mathiasson, L.; Jönsson, J.Å. Supported liquid membranes for sampling and sample preparation of pesticides in water. J. Chromatogr. A 1996, 754, 197–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Berhanu, T.; Liu, J.-F.; Romero, R.; Megersa, N.; Jönsson, J.Å. Determination of trace levels of dinitrophenolic compounds in environmental water samples using hollow fiber supported liquid membrane extraction and high performance liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 2006, 1103, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  223. Harruddin, N.; Othman, N.; Lim Ee Sin, A.; Raja Sulaiman, R.N. Selective removal and recovery of Black B reactive dye from simulated textile wastewater using the supported liquid membrane process. Environ. Technol. 2015, 36, 271–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  224. Huang, C.; Shen, X.; Gjelstad, A.; Pedersen-Bjergaard, S. Investigation of alternative supported liquid membranes in electromembrane extraction of basic drugs from human plasma. J. Membr. Sci. 2018, 548, 176–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  225. Kuosmanen, K.; Hyötyläinen, T.; Hartonen, K.; Riekkola, M.-L. Analysis of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in soil and sediment with on-line coupled pressurised hot water extraction, hollow fibre microporous membrane liquid–liquid extraction and gas chromatography. Analyst 2003, 128, 434–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  226. Ndungu, K.; Mathiasson, L. Microporous Membrane Liquid-liquid Extraction Technique Combined with Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry for the Determination of Organotin Compounds. Anal. Chim. Acta 2000, 404, 319–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  227. Zhou, Q.; Liu, J.-F.; Cai, Y.; Liu, G.; Jiang, G. Micro-porous membrane liquid–liquid extraction as an enrichment step prior to nonaqueous capillary electrophoresis determination of sulfonylurea herbicides. Microchem. J. 2003, 74, 157–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  228. Hyötyläinen, T.; Tuutijärvi, T.; Kuosmanen, K.; Riekkola, M.-L. Determination of pesticide residues in red wines with microporous membrane liquid–liquid extraction and gas chromatography. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2002, 372, 732–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  229. Liu, X.; Pawliszyn, R.; Wang, L.; Pawliszyn, J. On-site monitoring of biogenic emissions from Eucalyptus dunnii leaves using membrane extraction with sorbent interface combined with a portable gas chromatograph system. Analyst 2004, 129, 55–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  230. Kim, H.; Kim, S.; Lee, S. Use of flat-sheet membrane extraction with a sorbent interface for solvent-free determination of BTEX in water. Talanta 2012, 97, 432–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  231. Ma, V.; Lord, H.; Morley, M.; Pawliszyn, J. Application of membrane extraction with sorbent interface for breath analysis. Methods Mol. Biol. 2010, 610, 451–468. [Google Scholar]
  232. Raza, N.; Hashemi, B.; Kim, K.-H.; Lee, S.-H.; Deep, A. Aromatic hydrocarbons in air, water, and soil: Sampling and pretreatment techniques. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2018, 103, 56–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  233. Segal, A.; Górecki, T.; Mussche, P.; Lips, J.; Pawliszyn, J. Development of membrane extraction with a sorbent interface–micro gas chromatography system for field analysis. J. Chromatogr. A 2000, 873, 13–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  234. Ma, W.; Liu, X.; Pawliszyn, J. Analysis of human breath with micro extraction techniques and continuous monitoring of carbon dioxide concentration. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2006, 385, 1398–1408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  235. Yu, Y.; Pawliszyn, J. On-line monitoring of breath by membrane extraction with sorbent interface coupled with CO2 sensor. J. Chromatogr. A 2004, 1056, 35–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  236. Morley, M.; Pawliszyn, J. Membrane Extraction with a Sorbent Interface and Gas Chromatography for the Characterization of Ethylene in Human Breath. IEEE Sens. J. 2010, 10, 167–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  237. Posada-Ureta, O.; Olivares, M.; Navarro, P.; Vallejo, A.; Zuloaga, O.; Etxebarria, N. Membrane assisted solvent extraction coupled to large volume injection-gas chromatography–mass spectrometry for trace analysis of synthetic musks in environmental water samples. J. Chromatogr. A 2012, 1227, 38–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  238. Iparraguirre, A.; Navarro, P.; Rodil, R.; Prieto, A.; Olivares, M.; Etxebarria, N.; Zuloaga, O. Matrix effect during the membrane-assisted solvent extraction coupled to liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry for the determination of a variety of endocrine disrupting compounds in wastewater. J. Chromatogr. A 2014, 1356, 163–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  239. Schellin, M.; Hauser, B.; Popp, P. Determination of organophosphorus pesticides using membrane-assisted solvent extraction combined with large volume injection–gas chromatography–mass spectrometric detection. J. Chromatogr. A 2004, 1040, 251–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  240. Schellin, M.; Popp, P. Membrane-assisted solvent extraction of seven phenols combined with large volume injection–gas chromatography–mass spectrometric detection. J. Chromatogr. A 2005, 1072, 37–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  241. De Jager, L.S.; Perfetti, G.A.; Diachenko, G.W. Comparison of membrane assisted solvent extraction, stir bar sorptive extraction, and solid phase microextraction in analysis of tetramine in food. J. Sep. Sci. 2009, 32, 1081–1086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  242. Hauser, B.; Schellin, M.; Popp, P. Membrane-Assisted Solvent Extraction of Triazines, Organochlorine, and Organophosphorus Compounds in Complex Samples Combined with Large-Volume Injection-Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometric Detection. Anal. Chem. 2004, 76, 6029–6038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  243. Ncube, S.; Tavengwa, N.; Soqaka, A.; Cukrowska, E.; Chimuka, L. Development of a single format membrane assisted solvent extraction-molecularly imprinted polymer technique for extraction of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in wastewater followed by gas chromatography mass spectrometry determination. J. Chromatogr. A 2018, 1569, 36–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  244. Pedersen-Bjergaard, S.; Rasmussen, K.E. Electrokinetic migration across artificial liquid membranes: New concept for rapid sample preparation of biological fluids. J. Chromatogr. A 2006, 1109, 183–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  245. Tabani, H.; Khodaei, K.; Varanusupakul, P.; Alexovič, M. Gel electromembrane extraction: Study of various gel types and compositions toward diminishing the electroendosmosis flow. Microchem. J. 2020, 153, 104520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  246. Tabani, H.; Asadi, S.; Nojavan, S.; Parsa, M. Introduction of agarose gel as a green membrane in electromembrane extraction: An efficient procedure for the extraction of basic drugs with a wide range of polarities. J. Chromatogr. A 2017, 1497, 47–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  247. Tabani, H.; Shokri, A.; Tizro, S.; Nojavan, S.; Varanusupakul, P.; Alexovič, M. Evaluation of dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction by coupling with green-based agarose gel-electromembrane extraction: An efficient method to the tandem extraction of basic drugs from biological fluids. Talanta 2019, 199, 329–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  248. Verbeeck, R. Blood microdialysis in pharmacokinetic and drug metabolism studies. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2001, 45, 217–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  249. Davies, M. A review of microdialysis sampling for pharmacokinetic applications. Anal. Chim. Acta 1999, 379, 227–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  250. Glöggler, S.; Rizzitelli, S.; Pinaud, N.; Raffard, G.; Zhendre, V.; Bouchaud, V.; Sanchez, S.; Radecki, G.; Ciobanu, L.; Wong, A.; et al. In Vivo online magnetic resonance quantification of absolute metabolite concentrations in microdialysate. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 36080. [Google Scholar]
  251. Krebs-Kraft, D.L.; Frantz, K.J.; Parent, M.B. In Vivo Microdialysis: A Method for Sampling Extracellular Fluid in Discrete Brain Regions. In Handbook of Neurochemistry and Molecular Neurobiology: Practical Neurochemistry Methods; Lajtha, A., Baker, G., Eds.; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 2007; pp. 219–256. [Google Scholar]
  252. Anderzhanova, E.; Wotjak, C. Brain microdialysis and its applications in experimental neurochemistry. Cell Tissue Res. 2013, 354, 27–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  253. Mannino, S.; Cosio, M.S.; Zimei, P. Microdialysis sampling and high performance liquid chromatography with amperometric detection for sugar analysis in milk products. Electroanalysis 1996, 8, 353–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  254. Zhou, S.N.; Oakes, K.D.; Servos, M.R.; Pawliszyn, J. Use of simultaneous dual-probe microdialysis for the determination of pesticide residues in a jade plant (Crassula ovata). Analyst 2009, 134, 748–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  255. Torto, N.; Mwatseteza, J.; Sawula, G. A study of microdialysis sampling of metal ions. Anal. Chim. Acta 2002, 456, 253–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  256. Chen, C.Z.; Yan, C.T.; Kumar, P.V.; Huang, J.W.; Jen, J.F. Determination of alachlor and its metabolite 2,6-diethylaniline in microbial culture medium using online microdialysis enriched-sampling coupled to high-performance liquid chromatography. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011, 59, 8078–8085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  257. Jen, J.F.; Chang, C.T.; Yang, T.C. On-line microdialysis-high-performance liquid chromatographic determination of aniline and 2-chloroaniline in polymer industrial wastewater. J. Chromatogr. A 2001, 930, 119–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  258. Förster, Y.; Schmidt, J.R.; Wissenbach, D.K.; Pfeiffer, S.E.; Baumann, S.; Hofbauer, L.C.; Rammelt, S. Microdialysis Sampling from Wound Fluids Enables Quantitative Assessment of Cytokines, Proteins, and Metabolites Reveals Bone Defect-Specific Molecular Profiles. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0159580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  259. Jiang, R.; Pawliszyn, J. Thin-film microextraction offers another geometry for solid-phase microextraction. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2012, 39, 245–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  260. Pena-Pereira, F.; Costas-Mora, I.; Lavilla, I.; Bendicho, C. Rapid screening of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in waters by directly suspended droplet microextraction-microvolume fluorospectrometry. Talanta 2012, 89, 217–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  261. Cvjetko Bubalo, M.; Vidović, S.; Radojčić Redovniković, I.; Jokić, S. New perspective in extraction of plant biologically active compounds by green solvents. Food Bioprod. Process. 2018, 109, 52–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  262. Islam, M.N.; Park, J.-H.; Shin, M.-S.; Park, H.-S. Decontamination of PCBs-containing soil using subcritical water extraction process. Chemosphere 2014, 109, 28–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  263. Hashimoto, S.; Watanabe, K.; Nose, K.; Morita, M. Remediation of soil contaminated with dioxins by subcritical water extraction. Chemosphere 2004, 54, 89–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  264. Islam, M.N.; Jung, H.-Y.; Park, J.-H. Subcritical water treatment of explosive and heavy metals co-contaminated soil: Removal of the explosive, and immobilization and risk assessment of heavy metals. J. Environ. Manag. 2015, 163, 262–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  265. King, J.W.; Grabiel, R.D.; Wightman, J.D. Subcritical water extraction of anthocyanins from fruit berry substrates. In Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Supercritical Fluids, Versailles, France, 28–30 April 2003. [Google Scholar]
  266. Lin, E.Y.; Rahmawati, A.; Ko, J.-H.; Liu, J.-C. Extraction of yttrium and europium from waste cathode-ray tube (CRT) phosphor by subcritical water. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2018, 192, 166–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  267. Wu, H.; Li, C.; Li, Z.; Liu, R.; Zhang, A.; Xiao, Z.; Ma, L.; Li, J.; Deng, S. Simultaneous extraction of oil and tea saponin from Camellia oleifera Abel. Seeds under subcritical water conditions. Fuel Process. Technol. 2018, 174, 88–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  268. Zhang, H.; Liu, S.; Li, H.; Xue, F.; Han, S.; Wang, L.; Cheng, Y.; Wang, X. Extraction of isoflavones from Puerariae lobata using subcritical water. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 22652–22658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  269. Islam, M.N.; Jo, Y.-T.; Jung, S.-K.; Park, J.-H. Evaluation of Subcritical Water Extraction Process for Remediation of Pesticide-Contaminated Soil. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2013, 224, 1652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  270. Eckert-Tilotta, S.E.; Hawthorne, S.B.; Miller, D.J. Supercritical fluid extraction with carbon dioxide for the determination of total petroleum hydrocarbons in soil. Fuel 1993, 72, 1015–1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  271. Librando, V.; Hutzinger, O.; Tringali, G.; Aresta, M. Supercritical fluid extraction of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from marine sediments and soil samples. Chemosphere 2004, 54, 1189–1197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  272. Geranmayeh, A.; Mowla, A.; Rajaei, H.; Esmaeilzadeh, F.; Kaljahi, J.F. Extraction of hydrocarbons from the contaminated soil of Pazanan II production unit by supercritical carbon dioxide. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2012, 72, 298–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  273. van Bavel, B.; Dahl, P.; Karlsson, L.; Harden, L.; Rappe, C.; Lindstöm, G. Supercritical fluid extraction of pcbs from human adipose tissue for HRGC/LRMS analysis. Chemosphere 1995, 30, 1229–1236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  274. Simandi, B.; Kery, A.; Lemberkovics, E.; Oszagyan, M.; Ronyai, E.; Mathe, I.; Fekete, J.; Hethelyi, E. Supercritical fluid extraction of medicinal plants. In Process Technology Proceedings; von Rohr, P.R., Trepp, C., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1996; Volume 12, pp. 357–362. [Google Scholar]
  275. Lang, Q.; Wai, C.M. Supercritical fluid extraction in herbal and natural product studies—A practical review. Talanta 2001, 53, 771–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  276. Meskar, M.; Sartaj, M.; Sedano, J.A.I. Optimization of operational parameters of supercritical fluid extraction for PHCs removal from a contaminated sand using response surface methodology. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 3083–3094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  277. Sunarso, J.; Ismadji, S. Decontamination of hazardous substances from solid matrices and liquids using supercritical fluids extraction: A review. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 161, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  278. Freire, M.G.; Cláudio, A.F.M.; Araújo, J.M.M.; Coutinho, J.A.P.; Marrucho, I.M.; Lopes, J.N.C.; Rebelo, L.P.N. Aqueous biphasic systems: A boost brought about by using ionic liquids. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 4966–4995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  279. Marcinkowska, R.; Konieczna, K.; Marcinkowski, Ł.; Namieśnik, J.; Kloskowski, A. Application of ionic liquids in microextraction techniques: Current trends and future perspectives. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2019, 119, 115614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  280. Yavir, K.; Marcinkowski, Ł.; Marcinkowska, R.; Namieśnik, J.; Kloskowski, A. Analytical applications and physicochemical properties of ionic liquid-based hybrid materials: A review. Anal. Chim. Acta 2019, 1054, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  281. Ahmad Malik, M.; Hashim, M.; Nabi, F. Ionic Liquids in Supported Liquid Membrane Technology. Chem. Eng. J. 2011, 171, 242–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  282. Zhang, P.; Hu, L.; Lu, R.; Zhou, W.; Gao, H. Application of ionic liquids for liquid–liquid microextraction. Anal. Methods 2013, 5, 5376–5385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  283. Rykowska, I.; Ziemblińska, J.; Nowak, I. Modern approaches in dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME) based on ionic liquids: A review. J. Mol. Liq. 2018, 259, 319–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  284. Płotka-Wasylka, J.; Rutkowska, M.; Owczarek, K.; Tobiszewski, M.; Namieśnik, J. Extraction with environmentally friendly solvents. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2017, 91, 12–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  285. Gure, A.; Lara, F.J.; García-Campaña, A.M.; Megersa, N.; del Olmo-Iruela, M. Vortex-assisted ionic liquid dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction for the determination of sulfonylurea herbicides in wine samples by capillary high-performance liquid chromatography. Food Chem. 2015, 170, 348–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  286. Cacho, J.I.; Campillo, N.; Viñas, P.; Hernández-Córdoba, M. In Situ ionic liquid dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction coupled to gas chromatography-mass spectrometry for the determination of organophosphorus pesticides. J. Chromatogr. A 2018, 1559, 95–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  287. Zhou, Q.; Gao, Y. Determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in water samples by temperature-controlled ionic liquid dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction combined with high performance liquid chromatography. Anal. Methods 2014, 6, 2553–2559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  288. Abdolmohammad-Zadeh, H.; Sadeghi, G.H. A novel microextraction technique based on 1-hexylpyridinium hexafluorophosphate ionic liquid for the preconcentration of zinc in water and milk samples. Anal. Chim. Acta 2009, 649, 211–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  289. Passos, H.; Sousa, A.C.A.; Pastorinho, M.R.; Nogueira, A.J.A.; Rebelo, L.P.N.; Coutinho, J.A.P.; Freire, M.G. Ionic-liquid-based aqueous biphasic systems for improved detection of bisphenol A in human fluids. Anal. Methods 2012, 4, 2664–2667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  290. Yao, C.; Li, T.; Twu, P.; Pitner, W.R.; Anderson, J.L. Selective extraction of emerging contaminants from water samples by dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction using functionalized ionic liquids. J. Chromatogr. A 2011, 1218, 1556–1566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  291. Almeida, H.F.D.; Freire, M.G.; Marrucho, I.M. Improved monitoring of aqueous samples by the preconcentration of active pharmaceutical ingredients using ionic-liquid-based systems. Green Chem. 2017, 19, 4651–4659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  292. Zhou, Q.; Zhang, X.; Xiao, J. Ultrasound-assisted ionic liquid dispersive liquid-phase micro-extraction: A novel approach for the sensitive determination of aromatic amines in water samples. J. Chromatogr. A 2009, 1216, 4361–4365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  293. Shi, F.; Liu, J.; Liang, K.; Liu, R. Tris (pentafluoroethyl) trifluorophosphate-basd ionic liquids as advantageous solid-phase micro-extraction coatings for the extraction of organophosphate esters in environmental waters. J. Chromatogr. A 2016, 1447, 9–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  294. Abujaber, F.; Zougagh, M.; Jodeh, S.; Ríos, Á.; Guzmán Bernardo, F.J.; Rodríguez Martín-Doimeadios, R.C. Magnetic cellulose nanoparticles coated with ionic liquid as a new material for the simple and fast monitoring of emerging pollutants in waters by magnetic solid phase extraction. Microchem. J. 2018, 137, 490–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  295. Dinis, T.B.V.; Passos, H.; Lima, D.L.D.; Sousa, A.C.A.; Coutinho, J.A.P.; Esteves, V.I.; Freire, M.G. Simultaneous extraction and concentration of water pollution tracers using ionic-liquid-based systems. J. Chromatogr. A 2018, 1559, 69–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  296. Zhou, Q.-X.; Gao, Y.-Y. Combination of ionic liquid dispersive liquid-phase microextraction and high performance liquid chromatography for the determination of triazine herbicides in water samples. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2014, 25, 745–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  297. Vichapong, J.; Burakham, R.; Santaladchaiyakit, Y.; Srijaranai, S. A preconcentration method for analysis of neonicotinoids in honey samples by ionic liquid-based cold-induced aggregation microextraction. Talanta 2016, 155, 216–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  298. Li, S.; Cai, S.; Hu, W.; Chen, H.; Liu, H. Ionic liquid-based ultrasound-assisted dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction combined with electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry for a sensitive determination of cadmium in water samples. Spectrochim. Acta Part B At. Spectrosc. 2009, 64, 666–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  299. Abbott, A.P.; Capper, G.; Davies, D.L.; Munro, H.L.; Rasheed, R.K.; Tambyrajah, V. Preparation of novel, moisture-stable, Lewis-acidic ionic liquids containing quaternary ammonium salts with functional side chains. Chem. Commun. 2001, 19, 2010–2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  300. Farajzadeh, M.A.; Shahedi Hojghan, A.; Afshar Mogaddam, M.R. Development of a new temperature-controlled liquid phase microextraction using deep eutectic solvent for extraction and preconcentration of diazinon, metalaxyl, bromopropylate, oxadiazon, and fenazaquin pesticides from fruit juice and vegetable samples followed by gas chromatography-flame ionization detection. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2018, 66, 90–97. [Google Scholar]
  301. Makoś, P.; Przyjazny, A.; Boczkaj, G. Hydrophobic deep eutectic solvents as “green” extraction media for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in aqueous samples. J. Chromatogr. A 2018, 1570, 28–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  302. Helalat–Nezhad, Z.; Ghanemi, K.; Fallah–Mehrjardi, M. Dissolution of biological samples in deep eutectic solvents: An approach for extraction of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons followed by liquid chromatography-fluorescence detection. J. Chromatogr. A 2015, 1394, 46–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  303. Habibi, E.; Ghanemi, K.; Fallah-Mehrjardi, M.; Dadolahi-Sohrab, A. A novel digestion method based on a choline chloride–oxalic acid deep eutectic solvent for determining Cu, Fe, and Zn in fish samples. Anal. Chim. Acta 2013, 762, 61–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  304. Habibollahi, M.H.; Karimyan, K.; Arfaeinia, H.; Mirzaei, N.; Safari, Y.; Akramipour, R.; Sharafi, H.; Fattahi, N. Extraction and determination of heavy metals in soil and vegetables irrigated with treated municipal wastewater using new mode of dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction based on the solidified deep eutectic solvent followed by GFAAS. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2019, 99, 656–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  305. Wang, R.; Li, W.; Chen, Z. Solid phase microextraction with poly (deep eutectic solvent) monolithic column online coupled to HPLC for determination of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Anal. Chim. Acta 2018, 1018, 111–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  306. Torbati, M.; Mohebbi, A.; Farajzadeh, M.A.; Afshar Mogaddam, M.R. Simultaneous derivatization and air–assisted liquid–liquid microextraction based on solidification of lighter than water deep eutectic solvent followed by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry: An efficient and rapid method for trace analysis of aromatic amines in aqueous samples. Anal. Chim. Acta 2018, 1032, 48–55. [Google Scholar]
  307. Jeong, K.M.; Zhao, J.; Jin, Y.; Heo, S.R.; Han, S.Y.; Yoo, D.E.; Lee, J. Highly efficient extraction of anthocyanins from grape skin using deep eutectic solvents as green and tunable media. Arch. Pharmacal Res. 2015, 38, 2143–2152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  308. Yang, M.; Hong, K.; Li, X.; Ge, F.; Tang, Y. Freezing temperature controlled deep eutectic solvent dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction based on solidification of floating organic droplets for rapid determination of benzoylureas residual in water samples with assistance of metallic salt. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 56528–56536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  309. Florindo, C.; Branco, L.C.; Marrucho, I.M. Development of hydrophobic deep eutectic solvents for extraction of pesticides from aqueous environments. Fluid Phase Equilibria 2017, 448, 135–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  310. Cao, J.; Chen, L.; Li, M.; Cao, F.; Zhao, L.; Su, E. Two-phase systems developed with hydrophilic and hydrophobic deep eutectic solvents for simultaneously extracting various bioactive compounds with different polarities. Green Chem. 2018, 20, 1879–1886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  311. Kazi, T.G.; Afridi, H.I.; Bhatti, M.; Akhtar, A. A rapid ultrasonic energy assisted preconcentration method for simultaneous extraction of lead and cadmium in various cosmetic brands using deep eutectic solvent: A multivariate study. Ultrason. Sonochemistry 2019, 51, 40–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  312. van Osch, D.J.G.P.; Zubeir, L.F.; van den Bruinhorst, A.; Rocha, M.A.A.; Kroon, M.C. Hydrophobic deep eutectic solvents as water-immiscible extractants. Green Chem. 2015, 17, 4518–4521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  313. Ribeiro, B.D.; Florindo, C.; Iff, L.C.; Coelho, M.A.Z.; Marrucho, I.M. Menthol-based Eutectic Mixtures: Hydrophobic Low Viscosity Solvents. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2015, 3, 2469–2477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  314. Farajzadeh, M.A.; Afshar Mogaddam, M.R.; Aghanassab, M. Deep eutectic solvent-based dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction. Anal. Methods 2016, 8, 2576–2583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  315. Rajabi, M.; Ghassab, N.; Hemmati, M.; Asghari, A. Emulsification microextraction of amphetamine and methamphetamine in complex matrices using an up-to-date generation of eco-friendly and relatively hydrophobic deep eutectic solvent. J. Chromatogr. A 2018, 1576, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  316. Zhu, S.; Zhou, J.; Jia, H.; Zhang, H. Liquid–liquid microextraction of synthetic pigments in beverages using a hydrophobic deep eutectic solvent. Food Chem. 2018, 243, 351–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  317. Safavi, A.; Ahmadi, R.; Ramezani, A.M. Vortex-assisted liquid-liquid microextraction based on hydrophobic deep eutectic solvent for determination of malondialdehyde and formaldehyde by HPLC-UV approach. Microchem. J. 2018, 143, 166–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  318. Nedaei, M.; Zarei, A.R.; Ghorbanian, S.A. Development of a new emulsification microextraction method based on solidification of settled organic drop: Application of a novel ultra-hydrophobic tailor-made deep eutectic solvent. New J. Chem. 2018, 42, 12520–12529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  319. Shishov, A.; Volodina, N.; Nechaeva, D.; Gagarinova, S.; Bulatov, A. An automated homogeneous liquid-liquid microextraction based on deep eutectic solvent for the HPLC-UV determination of caffeine in beverages. Microchem. J. 2019, 144, 469–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  320. Ahmadi, R.; Kazemi, G.; Ramezani, A.M.; Safavi, A. Shaker-assisted liquid-liquid microextraction of methylene blue using deep eutectic solvent followed by back-extraction and spectrophotometric determination. Microchem. J. 2019, 145, 501–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  321. Deng, W.; Yu, L.; Li, X.; Chen, J.; Wang, X.; Deng, Z.; Xiao, Y. Hexafluoroisopropanol-based hydrophobic deep eutectic solvents for dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction of pyrethroids in tea beverages and fruit juices. Food Chem. 2019, 274, 891–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  322. Ghasemi, J.B.; Hashemi, B.; Shamsipur, M. Simultaneous spectrophotometric determination of uranium and zirconium using cloud point extraction and multivariate methods. J. Iran. Chem. Soc. 2012, 9, 257–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  323. Moradi, M.; Yamini, Y. Surfactant roles in modern sample preparation techniques: A review. J. Sep. Sci. 2012, 35, 2319–2340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  324. Hashemi, B.; Zohrabi, P.; Dehdashtian, S. Application of green solvents as sorbent modifiers in sorptive-based extraction techniques for extraction of environmental pollutants. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2018, 109, 50–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  325. Nagarajan, J.; Wah Heng, W.; Galanakis, C.M.; Nagasundara Ramanan, R.; Raghunandan, M.E.; Sun, J.; Ismail, A.; Beng-Ti, T.; Prasad, K.N. Extraction of phytochemicals using hydrotropic solvents. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2016, 51, 1151–1165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  326. Kunz, W.; Holmberg, K.; Zemb, T. Hydrotropes. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 2016, 22, 99–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  327. Shi, Z.; Xu, D.; Zhao, X.; Li, X.; Shen, H.; Yang, B.; Zhang, H. Dispersive admicelle solid-phase extraction based on sodium dodecyl sulfate coated Fe3O4 nanoparticles for the selective adsorption of three alkaloids in Gegen-Qinlian oral liquid before high-performance liquid chromatography. J. Sep. Sci. 2017, 40, 4591–4598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  328. Liu, Q.; Shi, J.; Wang, T.; Guo, F.; Liu, L.; Jiang, G. Hemimicelles/admicelles supported on magnetic graphene sheets for enhanced magnetic solid-phase extraction. J. Chromatogr. A 2012, 1257, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  329. Qi, P.; Liang, Z.-A.; Wang, Y.; Xiao, J.; Liu, J.; Zhou, Q.-Q.; Zheng, C.-H.; Luo, L.-N.; Lin, Z.-H.; Zhu, F.; et al. Mixed hemimicelles solid-phase extraction based on sodium dodecyl sulfate-coated nano-magnets for selective adsorption and enrichment of illegal cationic dyes in food matrices prior to high-performance liquid chromatography-diode array detection detection. J. Chromatogr. A 2016, 1437, 25–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  330. Li, C.; Chen, L.; Li, W. Magnetic titanium oxide nanoparticles for hemimicelle extraction and HPLC determination of organophosphorus pesticides in environmental water. Microchim. Acta 2013, 180, 1109–1116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  331. Beiraghi, A.; Pourghazi, K.; Amoli-Diva, M. Mixed supramolecular hemimicelles aggregates and magnetic carrier technology for solid phase extraction of ibuprofen in environmental samples prior to its HPLC-UV determination. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2014, 108, 103–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  332. Wang, W.; Chen, B.; Huang, Y. Eggshell Membrane-Based Biotemplating of Mixed Hemimicelle/Admicelle as a Solid-Phase Extraction Adsorbent for Carcinogenic Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014, 62, 8051–8059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  333. Wang, L.; Yuan, Q.; Liang, G.; Shi, L.; Zhan, Q. Magnetic mixed hemimicelles solid-phase extraction coupled with high-performance liquid chromatography for the extraction and rapid determination of six fluoroquinolones in environmental water samples. J. Sep. Sci. 2015, 38, 996–1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  334. Esmaeili-Shahri, E.; Es’haghi, Z. Superparamagnetic Fe3O4@SiO2 core–shell composite nanoparticles for the mixed hemimicelle solid-phase extraction of benzodiazepines from hair and wastewater samples before high-performance liquid chromatography analysis. J. Sep. Sci. 2015, 38, 4095–4104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  335. Mukdasai, S.; Butwong, N.; Thomas, C.; Srijaranai, S.; Srijaranai, S. A sensitive and selective spectrophotometric method for 2-chlorophenol based on solid phase extraction with mixed hemimicelle magnetic nanoparticles. Arab. J. Chem. 2016, 9, 463–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  336. Li, Y.; Wang, A.; Bai, Y.; Wang, S. Evaluation of a mixed anionic–nonionic surfactant modified eggshell membrane as an advantageous adsorbent for the solid-phase extraction of Sudan I–IV as model analytes. J. Sep. Sci. 2017, 40, 2591–2602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  337. Faraji, M.; Shariati, S.; Yamini, Y.; Adeli, M. Preconcentration of trace amounts of lead in water samples with cetyltrimethylammonium bromide coated magnetite nanoparticles and its determination by flame atomic absorption spectrometry. Arab. J. Chem. 2016, 9, S1540–S1546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  338. Mohammadi, S.Z.; Afzali, D.; Fallahi, Z.; Mehrabi, A.; Moslemi, S. Ligand-less in situ surfactant-based solid phase extraction for preconcentration of cobalt, nickel and zinc from water samples prior to their FAAS determination. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 2015, 26, 51–56. [Google Scholar]
  339. Viñas, P.; Pastor-Belda, M.; Torres, A.; Campillo, N.; Hernández-Córdoba, M. Use of oleic-acid functionalized nanoparticles for the magnetic solid-phase microextraction of alkylphenols in fruit juices using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Talanta 2016, 151, 217–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  340. Lashgari, M.; Basheer, C.; Kee Lee, H. Application of surfactant-templated ordered mesoporous material as sorbent in micro-solid phase extraction followed by liquid chromatography–triple quadrupole mass spectrometry for determination of perfluorinated carboxylic acids in aqueous media. Talanta 2015, 141, 200–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  341. Asgharinezhad, A.A.; Ebrahimzadeh, H. A simple and fast method based on mixed hemimicelles coated magnetite nanoparticles for simultaneous extraction of acidic and basic pollutants. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2016, 408, 473–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  342. Sobhi, H.R.; Ghambarian, M.; Behbahani, M.; Esrafili, A. Application of dispersive solid phase extraction based on a surfactant-coated titanium-based nanomagnetic sorbent for preconcentration of bisphenol A in water samples. J. Chromatogr. A 2017, 1518, 25–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  343. Zhou, Q.; Fang, Z. Highly sensitive determination of sulfonamides in environmental water samples by sodium dodecylbenzene sulfonate enhanced micro-solid phase extraction combined with high performance liquid chromatography. Talanta 2015, 141, 170–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  344. Raoufi, F.; Bagheri, S.; Niknam, E.; Niknam, K.; Farmani, H.R. Flame atomic absorption spectrometric determination of Cd (II), Zn (II) and Ag (I) in different matrixes after solid phase extraction on sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-coated alumina as their 2, 3 Di Hydro 2, 3 para tolyl Qinazoline (1 H)-4 one (DPTQO). J. Phys. Chem. 2015, 12, 265–276. [Google Scholar]
  345. Chemat, F.; Abert-Vian, M.; Fabiano-Tixier, A.S.; Strube, J.; Uhlenbrock, L.; Gunjevic, V.; Cravotto, G. Green extraction of natural products. Origins, current status, and future challenges. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2019, 118, 248–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  346. Tobiszewski, M.; Namieśnik, J. Greener organic solvents in analytical chemistry. Curr. Opin. Green Sustain. Chem. 2017, 5, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  347. Virot, M.; Tomao, V.; Ginies, C.; Chemat, F. Total Lipid Extraction of Food Using d-Limonene as an Alternative to n-Hexane. Chromatographia 2008, 68, 311–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  348. Villanueva Bermejo, D.; Angelov, I.; Vicente, G.; Stateva, R.P.; Rodriguez García-Risco, M.; Reglero, G.; Ibañez, E.; Fornari, T. Extraction of thymol from different varieties of thyme plants using green solvents. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2015, 95, 2901–2907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  349. Ciriminna, R.; Lomeli-Rodriguez, M.; Demma Carà, P.; Lopez-Sanchez, J.A.; Pagliaro, M. Limonene: A versatile chemical of the bioeconomy. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 15288–15296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  350. Tzia, C.; Liadakis, G. Extraction Optimization in Food Engineering; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  351. Negro, V.; Mancini, G.; Ruggeri, B.; Fino, D. Citrus waste as feedstock for bio-based products recovery: Review on limonene case study and energy valorization. Bioresour. Technol. 2016, 214, 806–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table
Table 1. Examples of solid phase extraction (SPE) applications in the analysis of various samples.
Table 1. Examples of solid phase extraction (SPE) applications in the analysis of various samples.
AnalytesMatrixTechniqueRef.
Diethylstilbestrol, dienestrol and hexestrolUrine and plasma GC-MS[40]
Salbutamol and clenbuterolLiver, kidney, muscleELISA[41]
Cd, Ni, PbWaterFAAS[42]
MicrocystinsWaterLC-MS[43]
Metal dithiocarbamatesWater and tissuesFAAS[44]
ImazalilCitrus fruitLC-MS[45]
GlycansGlycoproteinsMALDI-MS[46]
Pyrethroid BioallethrinFruit, vegetables, soil and dustELISA[47]
Aflatoxins B1 and B2PistachioIMS[48]
Paralytic shellfish poisoning toxinsShellfishLC-MS[49]
Fenoterol and fenoterol deravativesRat plasmaLC-MS[50]
ChlorophenolsWater GC-MS[51]
CyanazineWaterTOF-SIMS, DRIFT[52]
Pb, Cd, Ni, Zn, Fe, Cu, Co WaterFAAS[53]
Cationic surfactantsSurface waterIon chromatography[54]
PyraclostrobinFruit juicesLC-UV[55]
Chlorotriazine residues and dealkylated metabolitesSoil and waterLC-DAD[56]
CyclophosphamideSurface waterHPLC-MS[57]
PlatinumWater ICP-MS[58]
HexapeptidesAntiwrinkle cosmeticsLC-MS[59]
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbonsRiver, tap and mineral waterGC-MS[60]
Cyclic guanosine and cyclic adenosine monophosphateHuman plasma and animal tissueLC-MS[61]
NitrophenolsRiver waterCE-UV[62]
Endogenous cytokininsPlantLC-MS[63]
Proteins and phospholipidsPlasmaLC-MS[64]
BufadienolideTraditional Chinese medicinesLC-MS[65]
Indolic compoundsPlant extractsHPLC-UV[66]
Pyraclostrobin, picoxystrobin, and azoxystrobinWater samples strawberry juiceIAC-IMS[67]
Phosphatidylcholine and phosphatidylethanolamineSalmon fishMALDI-TOF[68]
ZanamivirWaterLC-MS[69]
Aminoglycoside antibioticsHoneyLC-MS[70]
Carbamate pesticide residuesFruit juiceUHPLC-MS[71]
TartrazineMilkLC-UV[72]
GC: gas chromatography; MS: mass spectrometry; ELISA: enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; FAAS: flame atomic absorption spectrometry; LC: liquid chromatography; MALDI: matrix-assisted laser desorption and ionization; IMS: ion mobility spectrometry; ToF-SIMS: time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry; DRIFT: diffuse reflectance Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy; ICP-MS: inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry; CE: capillary electrophoresis; UV: ultraviolet detector; IAC: immunoaffinity chromatography; UHPLC-MS: ultra-high performance liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry.
Table
Table 2. Examples of solid phase microextraction SPME applications in the analysis of various samples.
Table 2. Examples of solid phase microextraction SPME applications in the analysis of various samples.
AnalytesMatrixMethodRef.
Flavor volatilesGarlicHS-SPME-GC×GC-FID[105]
VolatilesBiological fluidsHS-SPME-GC/MS[106]
SolventsPharmaceutical productsSPME-GC-FID[107]
Fatty acidsLung tissuesHS-SPME-GC/MS[108]
Solvent residualsPharmaceutical samplesHS-SPME-GC[109]
Polar volatile solvent residualsPharmaceutical samplesHS-SPME-GC/MS[110]
Ethylbenzene, toluene, and xylene isomers.Water, gas, and soilHS-SPME-GC/MS[111]
Dichloroanisoles, trichloroanisoles and pentachloroanisoleCorkHS-SPME-GC-TOF-MS[112]
Aroma compoundsApricotsSPME-GC-MS[113]
Flavor volatile compoundsUncooked and cooked beef shanks, flanks, and ribsHS-SPME-GC-MS[114]
Volatile organic compoundsWater HS-SPME-GC-MS[115]
NitrosaminesLatex productsHS-SPME-GC-MS[116]
Volatile organic compoundsLung cell linesHS-SPME-GC-MS[117]
AldehydesHuman urineHPLC[118]
Manuka honeyA solid food model system HS-SPME-GC/MS[119]
Volatile compoundsJelly bush honeyMAE–HS-SPME-GC-MS[120]
Aroma volatile constituentsVegetation materialsHS-SPME-GC/MS[121,122,123,124]
Volatile contaminantsFruitsHS-SPME-GC/MS[125]
NerolidolFruitsHS-SPME-GC[126]
PesticidesTea SPME-GC-MIP-AED[127]
PesticidesHerbal and tea infusions.SPME-GC-MIP-AED[128]
Manganese compoundsHoneySPME-GC-MIP-AED[129]
Butyltin compounds Seawaters and soils SPME-GC-MIP-AED[130]
Volatile compoundsAromatic rice grainsHS-SPME-GCxGC-MS[131]
Biogenic aminesWineGC-MS[132]
LipidsHuman breast milkLC-MS[133]
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbonsAirport runoff waterGCxGC-MS[134]
Antifreeze substances Airport runoff watersGC-MS[135]
Polar organic compoundsWaterGC-FID[136]
HS-SPME: headspace solid phase microextraction; GC×GC: comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography; GC-FID: gas chromatography with flame ionization detection; GC-ToF-MS: gas chromatography/time-of-flight mass spectrometry; GC-MS: gas chromatography/mass spectrometry; GC-MIP-AED: gas chromatography/microwave-induced plasma atomic emission detection; HPLC: high performance liquid chromatography.
Table
Table 3. Examples of applications of ionic liquids (ILs) for sample preparation.
Table 3. Examples of applications of ionic liquids (ILs) for sample preparation.
AnalytesMatrixMethodRef.
Sulfonylurea herbicidesWine samplesHPLC[285]
Organophosphorus pesticidesWaterGC-MS[286]
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbonsWaterHPLC[287]
ZincWater and milkFAAS[288]
Bisphenol AHuman fluidsHPLC-MS[289]
Emerging contaminantsWaterHPLC-UV/Vis[290]
Fluoroquinolones and NSAIDsWaterHPLC-DAAD[291]
Aromatic aminesWaterHPLC[292]
Organophosphate esterswaterGC-MS[293]
Emerging pollutantsWaterHPLC-UV[294]
PollutantsWaterHPLC-UV[295]
Triazine herbicidesWaterHPLC-UV[296]
NeonicotinoidsHoneyHPLC-DAAD[297]
Organophosphorus pesticides and aromatic compoundsTap, rain and river waterHPLC-UV[16]
CadmiumWaterETAAS[298]
HPLC: high-performance liquid chromatography; FAAS: flame atomic absorption spectrometry; GC-MS: gas chromatography mass spectrometry; NSAIDs: nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; ETAAS: electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry.
Table
Table 4. Selected applications of deep eutectic solvents (DES) as green solvents in sample preparation.
Table 4. Selected applications of deep eutectic solvents (DES) as green solvents in sample preparation.
AnalytesMatrixMethodRef.
Diazinon, metalaxyl, bromopropylate, oxadiazon, and fenazaquin pesticidesFruit juice and vegetable samplesGC-FID[300]
PAHs (phenanthrene, anthracene, fluoranthene and pyrene)WaterGC-MS[301]
PAHs (naphthalene, biphenyl, fluorine, acenaphthylene, fluoranthene and anthracene)Marine biological samples (fish and microalgae)HPLC-FL[302]
Heavy metals (Zn, Fe, and Cu)FishFAAS[303]
Heavy metals (Cd, Pb, and Hg)Soil and vegetablesFAAS[304]
Ketoprofen, flurbiprofen and diclofenacLake waterHPLC-UV[305]
Aromatic aminesTap, surface and river water; wastewaterGC-MS[306]
AnthocyaninsGrapesHPLC-MS[307]
Benzoylureas residualRiver water, well water, and swimming pool waterHPLC-UV[308]
Pesticides (imidacloprid, acetamiprid, nitenpyram, and thiamethoxam)WaterUV-Vis[309]
Flavonoids, terpene trilactones, procyanidine, polyprenyl acetatesGinkgo biloba leavesHPLC-UV[310]
Lead and cadmiumLipsticks and eye shadowsFAAS[311]
Propionic acid, acetic acid, and butyric acidWaterHPLC-UV[312]
Caffeine, tryptophan, isophthalic acid and vanillinWaterUV-Vis[313]
Pesticides Fruit juiceGC-FID[314]
Amphetamine and methamphetamineHuman plasma, pharmaceutical waste waterHPLC-UV[315]
Synthetic pigmentsTea beverages, carbonated drinks, fruit juices, lactobacillus beveragesHPLC-PDA[316]
Malondialdehyde and formaldehydeHuman urine, apple juice, and rain waterHPLC-UV[317]
Nitroaromatic compoundsWaterHPLC-UV[318]
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbonsIndustrial effluentsGC-MS[301]
CaffeineGreen tea, cola and energy drinkHPLC-UV[319]
Methylene blueWastewater and river waterUV-Vis[320]
Pyrethroid pesticidesTea beverages and fruit juicesHPLC-UV[321]
GC–FID: gas chromatography with flame ionization detection; GC-MS: gas chromatography with mass spectrometric detection; FL: fluorescence detector; FAAS: flame atomic absorption spectrometry; UV: ultraviolet; Vis: visible; HPLC-PDA: high performance liquid chromatography equipped with photodiode array detector.
Table
Table 5. Examples of applications of surfactants for solid phase extraction of multiple analytes from various matrices.
Table 5. Examples of applications of surfactants for solid phase extraction of multiple analytes from various matrices.
AnalytesMatrixMethodRef.
Three alkaloidsOral liquidHPLC-UV[327]
PFASs and alkylphenolsEnvironmental waterHPLC-MS[328]
Illegal cationic dyesChili sauce, soybean paste and tomato sauceHPLC-DAAD[329]
Alkyltrimethylammonium saltsEnvironmental waterHPLC-UV[328]
Organophosphorus pesticidesEnvironmental waterHPLC-UV[330]
IbuprofenEnvironmental waterHPLC-UV[331]
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbonsEnvironmental waterHPLC-UV[332]
Six fluoroquinolonesEnvironmental waterHPLC-UV[333]
BenzodiazepinesHair and waste waterHPLC-DAAD[334]
2-ChlorophenolSoil UV-Vis[335]
Sudan dyeChilli sauce and ketchupHPLC-UV[336]
LeadWater FAAS[337]
Heavy metalsWater FAAS[338]
AlkylphenolsFruit juicesHPLC-MS[339]
Perfluorinated carboxylic acidsWaterHPLC-MS[340]
Acidic and basic pollutantsWaterHPLC-DAAD[341]
Bisphenol AWaterHPLC-UV[342]
SulfonamidesEnvironmental waterHPLC-UV[343]
Heavy metalsBlood, amalgam and natural waterFAAS[344]
HPLC-MS: high performance liquid chromatography with mass spectrometric detection; PFASs: perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances; FAAS: flame atomic absorption spectrometry; UV: ultraviolet; Vis: visible.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Aly, A.A.; Górecki, T. Green Approaches to Sample Preparation Based on Extraction Techniques. Molecules 2020, 25, 1719. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25071719

AMA Style

Aly AA, Górecki T. Green Approaches to Sample Preparation Based on Extraction Techniques. Molecules. 2020; 25(7):1719. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25071719

Chicago/Turabian Style

Aly, Alshymaa A., and Tadeusz Górecki. 2020. "Green Approaches to Sample Preparation Based on Extraction Techniques" Molecules 25, no. 7: 1719. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25071719

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop