#
An Overview of Self-Consistent Field Calculations Within Finite Basis Sets^{ †}

^{1}

^{2}

^{*}

^{†}

## Abstract

**:**

## 1. Introduction

## 2. Basis Set Expansion

## 3. Energy Expression

## 4. Unitary Invariance

## 5. Spin-Restriction vs. Unrestriction

## 6. Self-Consistent Field Equations

## 7. Solution of Self-Consistent Field Equations

## 8. Why Does the Self-Consistent Field Method Minimize the Energy?

## 9. Direct Minimization of the Energy

## 10. SCF vs. Direct Minimization

## 11. Density Functional Contributions to Kohn–Sham–Fock Matrix

#### 11.1. LDA Functionals

#### 11.2. GGA Functionals

#### 11.3. Meta-GGA Functionals

#### 11.4. Range-Separated Hybrid Functionals

#### 11.5. Non-Local Correlation

## 12. Summary and Discussion

## Author Contributions

## Funding

## Conflicts of Interest

Sample Availability: Not available. |

## References

- Poree, C.; Schoenebeck, F. A Holy Grail in Chemistry: Computational Catalyst Design: Feasible or Fiction? Acc. Chem. Res.
**2017**, 50, 605–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Lehtola, S. A review on non-relativistic, fully numerical electronic structure calculations on atoms and diatomic molecules. Int. J. Quantum Chem.
**2019**, 119, e25968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Lehtola, S. Fully numerical Hartree–Fock and density functional calculations. I. Atoms. Int. J. Quantum Chem.
**2019**, 119, e25945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Lehtola, S. Fully numerical Hartree–Fock and density functional calculations. II. Diatomic molecules. Int. J. Quantum Chem.
**2019**, 119, e25944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Roothaan, C. New Developments in Molecular Orbital Theory. Rev. Mod. Phys.
**1951**, 23, 69–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Hall, G.G. The Molecular Orbital Theory of Chemical Valency. VIII. A Method of Calculating Ionization Potentials. Proc. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci.
**1951**, 205, 541–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Löwdin, P.O. On the Nonorthogonality Problem. Adv. Quantum Chem.
**1970**, 5, 185–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Pople, J.A.; Nesbet, R.K. Self-Consistent Orbitals for Radicals. J. Chem. Phys.
**1954**, 22, 571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Berthier, G. Configurations électroniques incomplètes. Partie I. La Méthode du Champ Moléculaire Self-Consistent et l’Etude des Etats à Couches Incomplètes. J. Chim. Phys.
**1954**, 51, 363–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Roothaan, C. Self-Consistent Field Theory for Open Shells of Electronic Systems. Rev. Mod. Phys.
**1960**, 32, 179–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Krebs, S. A review on the derivation of the spin-Restricted Hartree–Fock (RHF) Self-Consistent Field (SCF) equations for open-shell systems. Description of different methods to handle the off-diagonal Lagrangian multipliers coupling closed and open shells. Comput. Phys. Commun.
**1999**, 116, 137–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Hohenberg, P.; Kohn, W. Inhomogeneous Electron Gas. Phys. Rev.
**1964**, 136, B864–B871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Kohn, W.; Sham, L.J. Self-Consistent Equations Including Exchange and Correlation Effects. Phys. Rev.
**1965**, 140, A1133–A1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Baerends, E.J. Perspective on “Self-consistent equations including exchange and correlation effects”. In Theoretical Chemistry Accounts; Cramer, C.J., Truhlar, D.G., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2000; pp. 265–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Geerlings, P.; De Proft, F.; Langenaeker, W. Conceptual Density Functional Theory. Chem. Rev.
**2003**, 103, 1793–1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Pople, J.A.; Gill, P.M.W.; Johnson, B.G. Kohn–Sham density-functional theory within a finite basis set. Chem. Phys. Lett.
**1992**, 199, 557–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Johnson, B.G.; Gill, P.M.W.; Pople, J.A. The performance of a family of density functional methods. J. Chem. Phys.
**1993**, 98, 5612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Johnson, B.G. Erratum: The performance of a family of density functional methods. J. Chem. Phys.
**1994**, 101, 9202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Kobayashi, K.; Kurita, N.; Kumahora, H.; Tago, K. Bond-energy calculations of Cu
_{2}, Ag_{2}, and CuAg with the generalized gradient approximation. Phys. Rev. A**1991**, 43, 5810–5813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Neumann, R.; Nobes, R.H.; Handy, N.C. Exchange functionals and potentials. Mol. Phys.
**1996**, 87, 1–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Vydrov, O.A.; Wu, Q.; Van Voorhis, T. Self-consistent implementation of a nonlocal van der Waals density functional with a Gaussian basis set. J. Chem. Phys.
**2008**, 129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Vydrov, O.A.; Van Voorhis, T. Improving the accuracy of the nonlocal van der Waals density functional with minimal empiricism. J. Chem. Phys.
**2009**, 130, 104105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Vydrov, O.A.; Van Voorhis, T. Nonlocal van der Waals density functional: The simpler the better. J. Chem. Phys.
**2010**, 133, 244103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version] - Vydrov, O.A.; Van Voorhis, T. Implementation and assessment of a simple nonlocal van der Waals density functional. J. Chem. Phys.
**2010**, 132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version] - Parrish, R.M.; Burns, L.A.; Smith, D.G.A.; Simmonett, A.C.; DePrince, A.E.; Hohenstein, E.G.; Bozkaya, U.; Sokolov, A.Y.; Di Remigio, R.; Richard, R.M.; et al. Psi4 1.1: An Open-Source Electronic Structure Program Emphasizing Automation, Advanced Libraries, and Interoperability. J. Chem. Theory Comput.
**2017**, 13, 3185–3197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Sun, Q.; Berkelbach, T.C.; Blunt, N.S.; Booth, G.H.; Guo, S.; Li, Z.; Liu, J.; McClain, J.D.; Sayfutyarova, E.R.; Sharma, S.; et al. PySCF: The Python-based simulations of chemistry framework. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Mol. Sci.
**2018**, 8, e1340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Becke, A.D.; Roussel, M.R. Exchange holes in inhomogeneous systems: A coordinate-space model. Phys. Rev. A
**1989**, 39, 3761–3767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Perdew, J.P. Jacob’s ladder of density functional approximations for the exchange-correlation energy. AIP Conf. Proc.
**2001**, 577, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Small, D.W.; Sundstrom, E.J.; Head-Gordon, M. Restricted Hartree Fock using complex-valued orbitals: A long-known but neglected tool in electronic structure theory. J. Chem. Phys.
**2015**, 142, 024104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Lee, J.; Bertels, L.W.; Small, D.W.; Head-Gordon, M. Kohn–Sham Density Functional Theory with Complex, Spin-Restricted Orbitals: Accessing a New Class of Densities without the Symmetry Dilemma. Phys. Rev. Lett.
**2019**, 123, 113001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Lehtola, S.; Head-Gordon, M.; Jónsson, H. Complex Orbitals, Multiple Local Minima, and Symmetry Breaking in Perdew–Zunger Self-Interaction Corrected Density Functional Theory Calculations. J. Chem. Theory Comput.
**2016**, 12, 3195–3207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Perdew, J.P.; Burke, K.; Ernzerhof, M. Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple. Phys. Rev. Lett.
**1996**, 77, 3865–3868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version] - Becke, A.D. A new mixing of Hartree–Fock and local density-functional theories. J. Chem. Phys.
**1993**, 98, 1372–1377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Stephens, P.J.; Devlin, F.J.; Chabalowski, C.F.; Frisch, M.J. Ab Initio Calculation of Vibrational Absorption and Circular Dichroism Spectra Using Density Functional Force Fields. J. Phys. Chem.
**1994**, 98, 11623–11627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Lehtola, S.; Jónsson, H. Unitary Optimization of Localized Molecular Orbitals. J. Chem. Theory Comput.
**2013**, 9, 5365–5372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Foster, J.; Boys, S. Canonical Configurational Interaction Procedure. Rev. Mod. Phys.
**1960**, 32, 300–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Edmiston, C.; Ruedenberg, K. Localized Atomic and Molecular Orbitals. Rev. Mod. Phys.
**1963**, 35, 457–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Pipek, J.; Mezey, P.G. A fast intrinsic localization procedure applicable for ab initio and semiempirical linear combination of atomic orbital wave functions. J. Chem. Phys.
**1989**, 90, 4916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Høyvik, I.; Jansik, B.; Jørgensen, P. Orbital localization using fourth central moment minimization. J. Chem. Phys.
**2012**, 137, 224114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Lehtola, S.; Jónsson, H. Pipek–Mezey Orbital Localization Using Various Partial Charge Estimates. J. Chem. Theory Comput.
**2014**, 10, 642–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Knizia, G.; Klein, J.E.M.N. Electron Flow in Reaction Mechanisms-Revealed from First Principles. Angew. Chemie Int. Ed.
**2015**, 54, 5518–5522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Liu, Y.; Kilby, P.; Frankcombe, T.J.; Schmidt, T.W. Calculating curly arrows from ab initio wavefunctions. Nat. Commun.
**2018**, 9, 1436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version] - Klein, J.E.M.N.; Knizia, G.; Rzepa, H.S. Epoxidation of Alkenes by Peracids: From Textbook Mechanisms to a Quantum Mechanically Derived Curly-Arrow Depiction. ChemistryOpen
**2019**, 8, 1244–1250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version] - Head-Gordon, M.; Pople, J.A. Optimization of wave function and geometry in the finite basis Hartree–Fock method. J. Phys. Chem.
**1988**, 92, 3063–3069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Van Voorhis, T.; Head-Gordon, M. A geometric approach to direct minimization. Mol. Phys.
**2002**, 100, 1713–1721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Coulson, C.A.; Fischer, I. XXXIV. Notes on the molecular orbital treatment of the hydrogen molecule. Lond. Edinb. Dublin Philos. Mag. J. Sci.
**1949**, 40, 386–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Löwdin, P.O. Quantum theory of cohesive properties of solids. Adv. Phys.
**1956**, 5, 1–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Lehtola, S. Curing basis set overcompleteness with pivoted Cholesky decompositions. J. Chem. Phys.
**2019**, 151, 241102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Lehtola, S. Accurate reproduction of strongly repulsive interatomic potentials. Phys. Rev. A.
**2020**, 101, 032504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Lehtola, S. Assessment of Initial Guesses for Self-Consistent Field Calculations. Superposition of Atomic Potentials: Simple yet Efficient. J. Chem. Theory Comput.
**2019**, 15, 1593–1604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Karlström, G. Dynamical damping based on energy minimization for use ab initio molecular orbital SCF calculations. Chem. Phys. Lett.
**1979**, 67, 348–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Cancès, E.; Le Bris, C. Can we outperform the DIIS approach for electronic structure calculations? Int. J. Quantum Chem.
**2000**, 79, 82–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Saunders, V.R.; Hillier, I.H. A “Level-Shifting” method for converging closed shell Hartree–Fock wave functions. Int. J. Quantum Chem.
**1973**, 7, 699–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Mitin, A.V. The dynamic "level shift" method for improving the convergence of the SCF procedure. J. Comput. Chem.
**1988**, 9, 107–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Dömötör, G.; Bán, M.I. Dynamic level-shifting. Comput. Chem.
**1989**, 13, 53–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Pulay, P. Convergence acceleration of iterative sequences. The case of SCF iteration. Chem. Phys. Lett.
**1980**, 73, 393–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Pulay, P. Improved SCF convergence acceleration. J. Comput. Chem.
**1982**, 3, 556–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Kudin, K.N.; Scuseria, G.E.; Cancès, E. A black-box self-consistent field convergence algorithm: One step closer. J. Chem. Phys.
**2002**, 116, 8255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Hu, X.; Yang, W. Accelerating self-consistent field convergence with the augmented Roothaan–Hall energy function. J. Chem. Phys.
**2010**, 132, 054109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Rabuck, A.D.; Scuseria, G.E. Improving self-consistent field convergence by varying occupation numbers. J. Chem. Phys.
**1999**, 110, 695–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Douady, J.; Ellinger, Y.; Subra, R.; Levy, B. A quadratically convergent SCF procedure. Comput. Phys. Commun.
**1979**, 17, 23–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Douady, J.; Ellinger, Y.; Subra, R.; Levy, B. Exponential transformation of molecular orbitals: A quadratically convergent SCF procedure. I. General formulation and application to closed-shell ground states. J. Chem. Phys.
**1980**, 72, 1452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Head-Gordon, M.; Pople, J.A.; Frisch, M.J. Quadratically convergent simultaneous optimization of wavefunction and geometry. Int. J. Quantum Chem.
**1989**, 36, 291–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Lehtola, S.; Jónsson, H. Variational, Self-Consistent Implementation of the Perdew–Zunger Self-Interaction Correction with Complex Optimal Orbitals. J. Chem. Theory Comput.
**2014**, 10, 5324–5337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Lehtola, S.; Jónsson, H. Correction to Variational, Self-Consistent Implementation of the Perdew–Zunger Self-Interaction Correction with Complex Optimal Orbitals. J. Chem. Theory Comput.
**2015**, 11, 5052–5053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Perdew, J.P.; Zunger, A. Self-interaction correction to density-functional approximations for many-electron systems. Phys. Rev. B
**1981**, 23, 5048–5079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Lehtola, S.; Parkhill, J.; Head-Gordon, M. Orbital optimisation in the perfect pairing hierarchy: Applications to full-valence calculations on linear polyacenes. Mol. Phys.
**2018**, 116, 547–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Parkhill, J.A.; Lawler, K.; Head-Gordon, M. The perfect quadruples model for electron correlation in a valence active space. J. Chem. Phys.
**2009**, 130, 084101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Parkhill, J.A.; Head-Gordon, M. A tractable and accurate electronic structure method for static correlations: The perfect hextuples model. J. Chem. Phys.
**2010**, 133, 024103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Seeger, R.; Pople, J.A. Self-consistent molecular orbital methods. XVIII. Constraints and stability in Hartree–Fock theory. J. Chem. Phys.
**1977**, 66, 3045–3050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Bauernschmitt, R.; Ahlrichs, R. Stability analysis for solutions of the closed shell Kohn–Sham equation. J. Chem. Phys.
**1996**, 104, 9047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Francisco, J.B.; Martínez, J.M.; Martínez, L. Globally convergent trust-region methods for self-consistent field electronic structure calculations. J. Chem. Phys.
**2004**, 121, 10863–10878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Thøgersen, L.; Olsen, J.; Yeager, D.; Jørgensen, P.; Sałek, P.; Helgaker, T. The trust-region self-consistent field method: Towards a black-box optimization in Hartree–Fock and Kohn–Sham theories. J. Chem. Phys.
**2004**, 121, 16–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Thøgersen, L.; Olsen, J.; Köhn, A.; Jørgensen, P.; Sałek, P.; Helgaker, T. The trust-region self-consistent field method in Kohn–Sham density-functional theory. J. Chem. Phys.
**2005**, 123, 074103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Almlöf, J.; Faegri, K.; Korsell, K. Principles for a direct SCF approach to LCAO-MO ab-initio calculations. J. Comput. Chem.
**1982**, 3, 385–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Van Lenthe, J.H.; Zwaans, R.; Van Dam, H.J.J.; Guest, M.F. Starting SCF calculations by superposition of atomic densities. J. Comput. Chem.
**2006**, 27, 926–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Gilbert, A.T.B.; Besley, N.A.; Gill, P.M.W. Self-Consistent Field Calculations of Excited States Using the Maximum Overlap Method (MOM). J. Phys. Chem. A
**2008**, 112, 13164–13171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Barca, G.M.J.; Gilbert, A.T.B.; Gill, P.M.W. Simple Models for Difficult Electronic Excitations. J. Chem. Theory Comput.
**2018**, 14, 1501–1509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Hait, D.; Head-Gordon, M. Excited state orbital optimization via minimizing the square of the gradient: General approach and application to singly and doubly excited states via density functional theory. J. Chem. Theory Comput.
**2020**. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Hait, D.; Head-Gordon, M. Highly Accurate Prediction of Core Spectra of Molecules at Density Functional Theory Cost: Attaining Sub-electronvolt Error from a Restricted Open-Shell Kohn–Sham Approach. J. Phys. Chem. Lett.
**2020**, 11, 775–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Thom, A.; Head-Gordon, M. Locating Multiple Self-Consistent Field Solutions: An Approach Inspired by Metadynamics. Phys. Rev. Lett.
**2008**, 101, 193001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Mardirossian, N.; Head-Gordon, M. Thirty years of density functional theory in computational chemistry: An overview and extensive assessment of 200 density functionals. Mol. Phys.
**2017**, 115, 2315–2372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Lehtola, S.; Steigemann, C.; Oliveira, M.J.T.; Marques, M.A.L. Recent developments in LIBXC—A comprehensive library of functionals for density functional theory. SoftwareX
**2018**, 7, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Ekström, U.; Visscher, L.; Bast, R.; Thorvaldsen, A.J.; Ruud, K. Arbitrary-Order Density Functional Response Theory from Automatic Differentiation. J. Chem. Theory Comput.
**2010**, 6, 1971–1980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Bloch, F. Bemerkung zur Elektronentheorie des Ferromagnetismus und der elektrischen Leitfähigkeit. Z. Phys.
**1929**, 57, 545–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Dirac, P.A.M. Note on Exchange Phenomena in the Thomas Atom. Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc.
**1930**, 26, 376–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Becke, A.D. Density-functional exchange-energy approximation with correct asymptotic behavior. Phys. Rev. A
**1988**, 38, 3098–3100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Perdew, J.P.; Yue, W. Accurate and simple density functional for the electronic exchange energy: Generalized gradient approximation. Phys. Rev. B
**1986**, 33, 8800–8802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Savin, A.; Flad, H.J. Density functionals for the Yukawa electron-electron interaction. Int. J. Quantum Chem.
**1995**, 56, 327–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Leininger, T.; Stoll, H.; Werner, H.J.; Savin, A. Combining long-range configuration interaction with short-range density functionals. Chem. Phys. Lett.
**1997**, 275, 151–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Heyd, J.; Scuseria, G.E.; Ernzerhof, M. Hybrid functionals based on a screened Coulomb potential. J. Chem. Phys.
**2003**, 118, 8207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Ahlrichs, R. A simple algebraic derivation of the Obara-Saika scheme for general two-electron interaction potentials. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.
**2006**, 8, 3072–3077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Heyd, J.; Scuseria, G.E.; Ernzerhof, M. Erratum: “Hybrid functionals based on a screened Coulomb potential”. J. Chem. Phys.
**2006**, 124, 219906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Mardirossian, N.; Head-Gordon, M. ωB97M-V: A combinatorially optimized, range-separated hybrid, meta-GGA density functional with VV10 nonlocal correlation. J. Chem. Phys.
**2016**, 144, 214110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version] - Berland, K.; Cooper, V.R.; Lee, K.; Schröder, E.; Thonhauser, T.; Hyldgaard, P.; Lundqvist, B.I. van der Waals forces in density functional theory: A review of the vdW-DF method. Rep. Prog. Phys.
**2015**, 78, 066501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version] - Grimme, S. Accurate description of van der Waals complexes by density functional theory including empirical corrections. J. Comput. Chem.
**2004**, 25, 1463–1473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Grimme, S.; Antony, J.; Ehrlich, S.; Krieg, H. A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H-Pu. J. Chem. Phys.
**2010**, 132, 154104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version] - Caldeweyher, E.; Bannwarth, C.; Grimme, S. Extension of the D3 dispersion coefficient model. J. Chem. Phys.
**2017**, 147, 034112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Najibi, A.; Goerigk, L. The Nonlocal Kernel in van der Waals Density Functionals as an Additive Correction: An Extensive Analysis with Special Emphasis on the B97M-V and ωB97M-V Approaches. J. Chem. Theory Comput.
**2018**, 14, 5725–5738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Santra, G.; Sylvetsky, N.; Martin, J.M.L. Minimally Empirical Double-Hybrid Functionals Trained against the GMTKN55 Database: revDSD-PBEP86-D4, revDOD-PBE-D4, and DOD-SCAN-D4. J. Phys. Chem. A
**2019**, 123, 5129–5143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Iron, M.A.; Janes, T. Evaluating Transition Metal Barrier Heights with the Latest Density Functional Theory Exchange–Correlation Functionals: The MOBH35 Benchmark Database. J. Phys. Chem. A
**2019**, 123, 3761–3781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Mardirossian, N.; Head-Gordon, M. Mapping the genome of meta-generalized gradient approximation density functionals: The search for B97M-V. J. Chem. Phys.
**2015**, 142, 074111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version] - Calbo, J.; Ortí, E.; Sancho-García, J.C.; Aragó, J. The Nonlocal Correlation Density Functional VV10. Annu. Rep. Comput. Chem.
**2015**, 11, 37–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

## Share and Cite

**MDPI and ACS Style**

Lehtola, S.; Blockhuys, F.; Van Alsenoy, C.
An Overview of Self-Consistent Field Calculations Within Finite Basis Sets. *Molecules* **2020**, *25*, 1218.
https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25051218

**AMA Style**

Lehtola S, Blockhuys F, Van Alsenoy C.
An Overview of Self-Consistent Field Calculations Within Finite Basis Sets. *Molecules*. 2020; 25(5):1218.
https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25051218

**Chicago/Turabian Style**

Lehtola, Susi, Frank Blockhuys, and Christian Van Alsenoy.
2020. "An Overview of Self-Consistent Field Calculations Within Finite Basis Sets" *Molecules* 25, no. 5: 1218.
https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25051218