Next Article in Journal
Cyclodextrin-Based Contrast Agents for Medical Imaging
Next Article in Special Issue
Special Issue “Lignocellulosic Biomass”
Previous Article in Journal
Nanomaterial Lipid-Based Carrier for Non-Invasive Capsaicin Delivery; Manufacturing Scale-Up and Human Irritation Assessment
Previous Article in Special Issue
Micro-Fibrillated Cellulose in Adhesive Systems for the Production of Wood-Based Panels
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 25
Issue 23
10.3390/molecules25235577
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Copper Adsorption on Lignin for the Removal of Hydrogen Sulfide

by
Miroslav Nikolic
1,
Marleny Cáceres Najarro
1,*,
Ib Johannsen
1,
Joseph Iruthayaraj
1,
Marcel Ceccato
1,2 and
Anders Feilberg
1,*
1
Department of Engineering, Aarhus University, Hangøvej 2, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark
2
Interdisciplinary Nanoscience Center (iNANO), Aarhus University, Gustav Wieds Vej 14, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2020, 25(23), 5577; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25235577
Submission received: 28 September 2020 / Revised: 17 November 2020 / Accepted: 23 November 2020 / Published: 27 November 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Lignocellulosic Biomass)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Lignin is currently an underutilized part of biomass; thus, further research into lignin could benefit both scientific and commercial endeavors. The present study investigated the potential of kraft lignin as a support material for the removal of hydrogen sulfide (H2S) from gaseous streams, such as biogas. The removal of H2S was enabled by copper ions that were previously adsorbed on kraft lignin. Copper adsorption was based on two different strategies: either directly on lignin particles or by precipitating lignin from a solution in the presence of copper. The H2S concentration after the adsorption column was studied using proton-transfer-reaction mass spectrometry, while the mechanisms involved in the H2S adsorption were studied with X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. It was determined that elemental sulfur was obtained during the H2S adsorption in the presence of kraft lignin and the differences relative to the adsorption on porous silica as a control are discussed. For kraft lignin, only a relatively low removal capacity of 2 mg of H2S per gram was identified, but certain possibilities to increase the removal capacity are discussed.

1. Introduction

In recent times, significant efforts are being placed into the substitution of fossil-based natural gas, also known as synthetic natural gas (SNG), with renewable biomethane (CH4), which is mainly obtained from upgrading biogas via the removal of CO2, H2S, and other trace gases [1,2]. Before upgrading, the biogas composition can contain between 80 and 4000 ppm of H2S, depending on the feedstock material [3]. The corrosive and harmful nature of H2S [3,4] requires it to be efficiently removed for further uses of biogas/biomethane. Numerous technologies already exist for the removal of H2S from gaseous streams, including solid reagents (oxides and salts), activated carbon, biological removal, solvent absorption, and chelating solutions; however, all of them have various deficiencies, such as incomplete absorption, methane absorption, operational difficulties, or high costs involved [5]. Therefore, novel approaches are being explored in order to uncover more effective solutions.
Lignin, the second most abundant biopolymer after cellulose, is currently an underutilized component of lignocellulosic biomass due to its heterogeneity, recalcitrant nature, and difficulties in processing, amongst others [6,7,8]. Lignin is often treated as waste material and the largest quantities are currently being burnt for energy as a low-value fuel [9]. With the emergence of biorefineries, the availability of lignin is only expected to increase in the future, making the valorization of lignin to various chemicals and materials of high importance [10].
In material applications, lignin has been studied for many years as a precursor for activated carbon adsorbents [11,12]. Activated carbons with structured pores and large internal surface areas have high adsorption capacities toward various substances [13], including H2S [14]. The high cost of activated carbons [15], together with increased environmental considerations [16], has influenced research to move toward lower-cost natural adsorbent materials. Lignin has also been studied for its natural adsorbent properties, without the utilization of carbonization processes, but mainly for adsorbing metal ions for use in, e.g., water purification [17]. The adsorption of metal ions on lignin is mostly driven by a large fraction of functional groups that are available due to various processes of lignin isolation from nature [17]. For example, milled wood lignin, which is a reasonable representation of native lignin, contains mostly aliphatic alcohol groups and only around 1 mmol/g of phenolic OH and around 0.2 mmol/g of carboxyl groups [18]. On the other hand, the most abundant technical lignins, such as kraft lignin and lignosulfonates, differ from that. Kraft process leads to around 3 mmol/g of phenolic OH and around 0.5 mmol/g of carboxyl groups [18,19], while lignosulfonates are typically characterized by 5–8 wt% of sulfur all in the form of a low pKa sulfonic groups, which can represent 13% of lignosulfonates’ weight [20]. Since transition metals are also effective in the removal of H2S [3,5], we have chosen to premiere a study of utilizing non-carbonized lignin as a support for copper ions in the removal of H2S.
Ferric oxide and chelated ferric solutions are the most often used among the H2S removal technologies centered on transition metals [5,14] due to the high removal capacity and the more benign environmental effects of iron compared to most of the other transition metals. However, we have opted for copper in our study for the following reasons. First, a recent study has shown the good removal capacity of H2S by a copper (II) solution due to the precipitation of copper (II) sulfide [21]. When utilized heterogeneously (as adsorbed on other solid supports), copper has shown better results compared to several metal ions, including iron [22]. In addition, if the use of lignin in water purification is commercialized in the future, large amounts of lignin saturated with heavy metal ions, such as copper, can easily become available. To the best of our knowledge, the application of lignin as a support material for copper in gas purification has not been reported previously. The present study focused on establishing copper adsorption mechanisms on a lignin structure and determined their removal capacity toward H2S. The results offer an initial insight into potentially extending the value chain of lignin into biogas cleaning, going beyond water purification. The system was tested for the treatment of a model system consisting of H2S in N2 in order to characterize the process under controlled conditions. H2S is the dominant sulfur compound in many applications, including biogas [23,24,25], and its removal will not be significantly influenced by the presence of small amounts of other sulfur compounds. A lignin-Cu adsorbent would typically be applied as a final purification step to protect, e.g., catalysts from sulfur poisoning [24,25]. It is therefore relevant to test a model system containing only H2S.

2. Materials and Methods

Softwood kraft lignin BioPiva 100 was purchased from UPM (Helsinki, Finland). Copper (II) bromide and tetrahydrofurane (THF) were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (Vandtårnsvej, Denmark) and used as obtained. Davison silica gel grade 12 60/80 mesh was sourced from Supelco Analytical (Bellefonte, PA, USA). A hydrogen sulfide (H2S) gas cylinder (720 ppm) with nitrogen as a carrier gas was procured from AGA (Fredericia, Denmark).

2.1. Copper Adsorption

Before further treatment, the kraft lignin was washed three times with Milli-Q water (Millipore, Denmark) and dried at 45 °C. This process allowed for removing soluble compounds, e.g., sulfate ions [26]. In one set of experiments, 2 g of washed kraft lignin was dispersed in a 0.15 M solution of CuBr2 and stirred overnight. The following day, lignin was separated via centrifugation, washed several times, and dried at 45 °C before further use.
In the second set of experiments, washed kraft lignin was dissolved in THF, mixed with a CuBr2 water solution, and stirred overnight. The copper concentration (0.15 M) was kept the same as in the previous experiment, while a particular THF:water ratio of 5:2 by weight was selected based on trial and error to avoid precipitation. The following day, the THF was removed using a rotary evaporator and the lignin particles were washed with water several times and dried at 45 °C before further use.
Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was used to establish the amount of copper adsorbed on solid lignin. Kraft lignin powder before and after adsorption was heated from room temperature to 800 °C at a rate of 10 °C/min under nitrogen.

2.2. H2S Removal Experiments

For the H2S removal experiments, lignin was mixed with Davison porous silica in a 1:3 weight ratio and the adsorption experiments were repeated in the same manner. The H2S removal experiments were performed in a laboratory-developed test at room temperature to determine the capacity of lignin (with adsorbed copper) for H2S removal. Controls utilizing only silica with adsorbed copper, silica without adsorbed copper, and a silica/lignin mixture without adsorbed copper were tested to enable normalization and to calculate the adsorption capacity of lignin.
The material was packed in a Teflon column (length 90 mm, inner diameter 3.2 mm, 0.5 g of adsorbent material) by placing glass wool on both ends of the column to prevent material loss during the experiments. The H2S was diluted with compressed air and the flow rates were controlled with gas mass flow controllers (Bronkhorst EL FLOW, Ruurlo, The Netherlands). Air containing 5 ppm of H2S (the H2S concentration was chosen after initial screening tests) was passed through a Teflon column at 300 mL/min. To determine the influence of moisture on the H2S removal, the experiments were performed utilizing non-conditioned compressed air (14% relative humidity (RH)) and air passed through a water impinger to obtain 90–100% relative humidity.
A proton-transfer-reaction mass spectrometer (PTR-MS, Ionicon Analytik GmbH, Innsbruck, Austria), which allowed for online data collection, was used for monitoring the H2S (mass-to-charge ratio (m/z) of 35) removal by measuring after the adsorption column. The instrument used was a high-sensitivity quadrupole PTR-MS. The PTR-MS was operated under standard drift tube conditions with a voltage at 600 V and pressure close to 2.2 mbar, while the inlet and chamber temperature was set to 75 °C.
The experiments were stopped when a 10% (0.5 ppm of H2S) breakthrough was reached. An empty column was run before the actual experiment in order to establish the maximum measured level of H2S with PTR-MS under the set conditions. Although silica gel is hydrophilic, the humidity did not affect any of the packed columns over the course of the experiments to any significant degree. The H2S signal was therefore not corrected for humidity dependency in order to determine percentage removal efficiency [27]. The removal capacity was calculated based on the inlet and outlet H2S concentrations, flow rate, breakthrough time, and the volume of adsorbent material.

2.3. X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS)

The XPS analyses were performed with a Kratos Axis UltraDLD spectrometer (Kratos Analytical Ltd., Manchester, UK) using a monochromated Al X-ray source (1486.7 eV) operated at 150 W and pressure in the main chamber in the 10−9 torr range. The information collected was related to approximately the top 10 nm of the sample surface. Survey scans were performed with a 1.0 eV step size and a 160 eV analyzer pass energy, while the high-resolution scans were recorded at a 20 eV pass energy and a 0.1 eV step size. The spectra were processed using CasaXPS software (Version 2.3.20, Casa Software Ltd., Terrace Teignmouth, UK) and calibrated by setting the main C1s peak to 284.8 eV. The atomic surface concentration (atom%) was determined from the survey spectra and represents the average of the measurements taken at two different spots on each sample.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Copper Adsorption

The formation of stable surface complexes between the Cu(II) cations and the lignin substrate has been documented [28]. The surface of lignin particles is rich in functional groups, such as carboxyl and alcohol groups, that have a high affinity toward metal ions. The softwood kraft lignin used in this study was previously characterized to have 0.5 mmol/g of carboxyl groups, 2.0 mmol/g of aliphatic OH, and 4.8 mmol/g of various phenolic OH species [29]. Past research has shown higher adsorption of copper ions on lignin at higher pH levels in general [30,31], suggesting the importance of deprotonating surface carboxyl groups for obtaining a high adsorption capacity. At the same time, for certain metal ions, such as Fe(III), coordination with phenolic oxygen was established [32] and should not be neglected. Figure 1 shows the thermogravimetric analysis for kraft lignin and the samples with adsorbed copper. TGA is a technique that is broadly used to study the adsorption of materials [33,34,35,36], and in the present study, it allowed for establishing the amount of copper adsorbed on powder lignin. Kraft lignin had a residual weight of around 40% at 800 °C, which is in line with other research results for softwood kraft lignin with the same applied heating rate [37]. As expected, samples with adsorbed copper had a higher residual weight at 800 °C compared to pure kraft lignin. The copper adsorption capacity of lignin was calculated based on the TGA curves as the difference between the residual weight at 800 °C for lignin before and after adsorption. When Cu(II) was adsorbed on lignin particles, a capacity of 14 ± 5 mg/g of lignin was determined, in agreement with previous results for various lignin particles [30,31,38,39,40].
On the other hand, by dissolving lignin in the THF/H2O mixture and later precipitating it, the capacity for copper adsorption increased several times to 72 ± 13 mg/g of lignin. By solubilizing lignin, thus disentangling the polymer structure and solvating all the functional groups [41], the number of functional groups accessible to copper ions increased compared to the particle form, thereby increasing the total number of adsorption sites for copper ions. This effect can be considered as a general concept regarding the accessibility of functional groups. For example, Sun et al. [42] have shown with the use of qNMR combined with wet chemistry that the accessible amine content is lower on modified silica particles compared to the amine content of the same dissolved silica. It is well known that in solution, Cu(II) can form complexes of various stabilities with amines, acids, and hydroxy-acids [43]. For hydroxy-acids, such as dihydroxybenzoic acid, it has been shown that Cu complexes can remain stable without being dissolved through a combination of electrostatic interactions and an extended network of hydrogen bonds due to retention of water molecules [44]. Similar mechanisms are likely involved for macromolecular lignin-Cu complexes; thus, once copper is complexed in solution, it can remain stable upon precipitation. Considering all these, it is not surprising that the adsorption capacity increased for the same lignin. Metal ion adsorption on lignin is most often exploited for water purification, in which case, adsorption on already-formed particles is the most logical route [17]. However, this result shows that for other applications, alternative approaches should also be considered.

3.2. H2S Removal Experiments

The performances of the materials for H2S adsorption were characterized in terms of the breakthrough capacity using the method described in Section 2.2. The utilized PTR-MS instrument allowed for continuous and direct measurement of the H2S levels with a time resolution of 100 ms. Figure 2 shows an example of breakthrough curves during screening tests for a system with and without adsorbed copper. It was clear from the tested controls that without copper, breakthroughs were occurring practically immediately and that copper was responsible for the H2S removal from the air stream. Initially, tests were done by filling the column with only lignin. However, due to the kraft lignin powder packing density and low porosity of the particles, it was not possible to obtain stable airflow through the column (because of the large pressure build-up and likely occurrence of air channeling). The typical surface area of kraft lignin powder is in the range of 0.1–30 m2/g [45,46,47], which is low for powder adsorbents, and for this reason, Davison porous silica gel with a surface area of 750 m2/g (data obtained from the supplier) was introduced. The selected 3:1 weight ratio of silica powder to lignin powder provided a distribution of particles in the column such that there was no airflow fluctuation through the column during the experiment. Tests were also made with only porous silica as the adsorbent material (with and without copper) to enable the normalization of the results for lignin/silica mixtures.
Table 1 shows the determined breakthrough capacities for H2S removal. It can be seen that the higher removal capacity was obtained for the system that could adsorb more copper since the native materials (silica and kraft lignin) did not show tendencies toward adsorbing H2S at significant levels (data not shown). Past research has shown that the levels of copper adsorption by non-modified amorphous silica are around 5 mg/g [48,49,50], which is lower than the determined value for the two lignin systems herein and is likely the reason for the lower H2S removal capacity of silica.
The highest removal capacity was determined for lignin precipitated from solution with adsorbed copper at the level of 2 mg H2S/g of lignin, which is multiple times lower compared to, e.g., activated carbon [51]. In the current work, our main goal was to study the reactivity and no effort has been made to increase the porosity and surface area of the material. Therefore, it was not expected that the non-modified kraft lignin could reach the performance of specifically activated carbons with very high surface areas. However, certain H2S removal technologies for gas purification, such as amine absorption and biological purification, struggle to completely remove H2S [5], while implementation in national grids requires H2S concentrations under 5 ppm and applications in fuel cells can require levels below 0.1 ppm [3,52]. This suggests that if the processing conditions and the price levels are convenient, one can potentially utilize the lignin-Cu adsorbents as an additional post-treatment purification system for H2S removal for, e.g., fuel cell applications or biogas upgrading that require particularly low levels of H2S. This would mean that lignin-Cu would be used for the treatment of pretreated relatively clean gas (with respect to co-contaminants). Regarding processing, solid adsorbents are easy to handle, but in order to use lignin as a sole powder adsorbent (and without carbonization), the porosity and surface area of the particles would need to be increased without substantially reducing the concentration of functional groups. Examples of such methods could be related to the works of Li et al. [53] or Cantu et al. [54]. Specific modification of lignin can further increase the metal ion capacity, where values as high as 400 mg of Cu(II) per gram of lignin-based adsorbent have already been achieved via the carboxymethylation of lignin [55], where the H2S removal capacity could be enhanced in that manner. Increasing the capacity would also make studying the copper recovery relevant, which regarding lignin-based adsorbents, currently relies on desorption at low pH levels [56,57].
Biogas is typically saturated with water that is removed during the upgrading process [58]. H2S removal technologies, such as iron oxides and activated carbons, require a certain level of humidity in order to achieve high removal capacities, but too high a water content can negatively influence the process [58,59]. The humidity is believed to enable H2S dissociation on the surface of the carbon, which promotes redox reactions with dissociatively adsorbed oxygen [51]. For these reasons and to obtain a better understanding of our system, it was important to study whether the humidity level influenced the adsorption capacity and the H2S removal mechanisms. In our experiments, by saturating the air with humidity, the adsorption capacity decreased by 10–40% (Table 1) for all the samples; this issue is further discussed in the following section.

3.3. X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy

After the H2S adsorption, the silica samples and silica/kraft lignin samples with a higher capacity were collected and studied using XPS in order to understand the mechanisms and determine whether copper (II) sulfide was formed or a reaction was occurring on the adsorbent material. The determined peak positions are summarized in Table 2, while Figure 3 shows the copper and sulfur 2p XPS spectra for the silica sample.
The two Cu 2p3/2 peaks of 932.4 eV and 933.5 eV were both assigned to monovalent Cu(I) with a formal oxidation state +1 (Cu2−xS) [60]. The binding energy of 933.5 eV is also characteristic of Cu(II) [61], but the absence of a shake-up satellite peak (at approximately 944 eV) [62] excluded this possibility. The first peak at 932.4 eV was 0.2–0.3 eV lower than the value expected for CuS and indicated a S-rich nonstoichiometric environment. This was confirmed by the S 2p3/2 peak at 162.7–162.9 eV, which is higher than the typical S 2p3/2 peaks for Cu2S that are expected at 161.7–161.9 eV [63]. The presence of the two peaks in Figure 3b arose from a spin–orbit splitting between the S 2p1/2 and S2p3/2 states. Finally, the Cu (LMM) peak at 568.7–568.9 eV confirmed that the formal oxidation state of copper was Cu(I), since for Cu (0), the peak is expected at 568.1 eV [64]. To summarize, on the porous silica sample after H2S adsorption, the formal oxidative states could be confirmed as +1 for copper and −1 for sulfur.
For the sample that was a silica/lignin mixture, the situation was found to be somewhat different (Figure 4). The position of the S2p3/2 163.8–164.0 peak could be ascribed to elemental S0 [65]. Another possibility does exist, as unpassivated sulfur atoms in a Cu2−xS compound were found at a similar position [60]. Regarding copper, similar observations were made as that of the previous sample. Cu(II) and Cu0 oxidation states were excluded in the same manner. The Cu 2p3/2 peaks at 933.1–933.6 eV were assigned to Cu(I) in a Cu-rich environment, which could explain the high binding energy compared to Cu2S, while the Cu (LMM) at 571.6 eV was higher than expected for Cu(I), as has been observed before [64]. It was interesting to see that while the situation with copper did not change substantially, in the presence of lignin, the dominant form of sulfur was its elemental form. It seems that in the presence of lignin, the electrochemical potential of the reaction changed, allowing for a higher oxidative state of sulfur to emerge. It was previously found that the adsorption of transition metal ions, such as iron, on polymeric lignin model compounds can be responsible for the oxidation of phenolic groups to species like semiquinonic radicals [66]. The occurrence of these and other types of radicals, for example, hydroxyl radicals, can explain the formation of elemental sulfur.
When we observe the peak positions for all the samples in Table 2, it is clear that the mechanisms involved were the same, irrespective of the relative air humidity. It appears that low relative humidity is sufficient for effective changes in oxidative states of copper and sulfur, likely by enabling the dissociation of H2S on the surface of the adsorbent material. As the mechanisms are the same, a lower H2S adsorption capacity with 100% relative humidity of air (Table 1) is possibly explained by water molecules competing for the same sites on the adsorbent material. Another possibility could be the development of a similar situation observed with iron oxides, where water is necessary for the redox process, but a high water content leads to a decrease in available adsorption sites since the oxide surface area decreases due to the adsorbent material sticking together [58].

4. Conclusions

This study has shown that during H2S adsorption in the presence of kraft lignin, elemental sulfur was formed, while the oxidation state of copper changed to +1. By first solubilizing lignin, it was possible to increase the copper adsorption by several times compared to the adsorption on already-formed lignin particles, and thus, improve the H2S removal capacity. The observed H2S removal capacity of 2 mg/g of kraft lignin was low and it is clear that to consider the utilization of lignin from this perspective, further studies should be done. For instance, introducing porosity into lignin particles, along with increasing the adsorption of transition metal ions by specific chemical modifications, would positively influence the removal capacity.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments, all authors; performed the experiments, M.N., M.C.N., M.C., and A.F.; analyzed and interpreted the data, all authors; writing—original draft preparation, M.N.; writing—review and editing, M.N., M.C.N., M.C., I.J., J.I., I.B., & A.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The research was funded by the NordForsk organization through project number 82214 within the Nordic Green Growth Research and Innovation Programme.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank project partners within the Nordic Green Growth Research and Innovation Programme for helpful discussions during this work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Jensen, M.B.; Strubing, D.; de Jonge, N.; Nielsen, J.L.; Ottosen, L.D.M.; Koch, K.; Kofoed, M.V.W. Stick or leave-Pushing methanogens to biofilm formation for ex situ biomethanation. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 291, 121784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wall, D.M.; Dumont, M.; Murphy, J.D. Green Gas: Facilitating a Future Green Gas Grid through the Production of Renewable Gas; Murphy, J.D., Ed.; IEA Bioenergy: Paris, France, 2018; ISBN 978-1-910154-37-3. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bailon, L.; Hinge, J. Biogas Upgrading. Evaluation of Methods for H2S Removal; Danish Technological Institute, 2014. Available online: www.teknologisk.dk/_/media/60599_Biogas%20upgrading.%20Evaluation%20of%20methods%20for%20H2S%20removal.pdf (accessed on 1 September 2020).
  4. European Chemicals Agency: Homepage. Available online: https://echa.europa.eu/substance-information/-/substanceinfo/100.029.070. (accessed on 8 June 2020).
  5. Huertas, J.I.; Giraldo, N.; Izquierdo, S. Removal of H2S and CO2 from Biogas by Amine Absorption. In Mass Transfer in Chemical Engineering Processes; Markos, J., Ed.; InTech: Rijeka, Croatia, 2011; pp. 133–151. ISBN 978-953-307-619-5. [Google Scholar]
  6. Gosselink, R.J.A.; de Jong, E.; Guran, B.; Abächerli, A. Co-ordination network for lignin—standardisation, production and applications adapted to market requirements (EUROLIGNIN). Ind. Crops Prod. 2004, 20, 121–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Himmel, M.E.; Ding, S.Y.; Johnson, D.K.; Adney, W.S.; Nimlos, M.R.; Brady, J.W.; Foust, T.D. Biomass recalcitrance: Engineering plants and enzymes for biofuels production. Science 2007, 315, 804–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Vardon, D.R.; Franden, M.A.; Johnson, C.W.; Karp, E.M.; Guarnieri, M.T.; Linger, J.G.; Salm, M.J.; Strathmann, T.J.; Beckham, G.T. Adipic acid production from lignin. Energy Environ. Sci. 2015, 8, 617–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. De Jong, E.; Gosselink, R.J.A. Lignocellulose-Based Chemical Products; Elsevier Inc. Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2014; pp. 277–313. [Google Scholar]
  10. Zakzeski, J.; Bruijnincx, P.C.; Jongerius, A.L.; Weckhuysen, B.M. The catalytic valorization of lignin for the production of renewable chemicals. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 3552–3599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Hayashi, J.; Kazehaya, A.; Muroyama, K.; Watkinson, A.P. Preparation of activated carbon from lignin by chemical activation. Carbon N. Y. 2000, 38, 1873–1878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Khezami, L.; Chetouani, A.; Taouk, B.; Capart, R. Production and characterisation of activated carbon from wood components in powder: Cellulose, lignin, xylan. Powder Technol. 2005, 157, 48–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Suhas; Carrott, P.J.M.; Ribeiro Carrott, M.M.L. Lignin-from natural adsorbent to activated carbon: A review. Bioresour. Technol. 2007, 98, 2301–2312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Abatzoglou, N.; Boivin, S. A review of biogas purification processes. Biofuels Bioprod. Biorefining 2009, 3, 42–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Rafatullah, M.; Sulaiman, O.; Hashim, R.; Ahmad, A. Adsorption of methylene blue on low-cost adsorbents: A review. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 177, 70–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. O’Connell, D.W.; Birkinshaw, C.; O’Dwyer, T.F. Heavy metal adsorbents prepared from the modification of cellulose: A review. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99, 6709–6724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Ge, Y.; Li, Z. Application of Lignin and Its Derivatives in Adsorption of Heavy Metal Ions in Water: A Review. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 7181–7192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Balakshin, M.; Capanema, E. On the Quantification of Lignin Hydroxyl Groups With 31 P and 13 C NMR Spectroscopy. J. Wood Chem. Technol. 2015, 35, 220–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gosselink, R.J.A.; van Dam, J.E.G.; de Jong, E.; Scott, E.L.; Sanders, J.P.M.; Li, J.; Gellerstedt, G. Fractionation, analysis, and PCA modeling of properties of four technical lignins for prediction of their application potential in binders. Holzforschung 2010, 64, 193–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sumerskii, I.; Korntner, P.; Zinovyev, G.; Rosenau, T.; Potthast, A. Fast track for quantitative isolation of lignosulfonates from spent sulfite liquors. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 92732–92742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yan, G.; Weng, H.; Yang, J.; Bao, W.; Gao, Y.; Yin, Y. Hydrogen sulfide removal by copper sulfate circulation method. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2016, 33, 2359–2365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Nguyen-Thanh, D.; Bandosz, T.J. Activated carbons with metal containing bentonite binders as adsorbents of hydrogen sulfide. Carbon N. Y. 2005, 43, 359–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Montebello, A.M.; Fernández, M.; Almenglo, F.; Ramírez, M.; Cantero, D.; Baeza, M.; Gabriel, D. Simultaneous methylmercaptan and hydrogen sulfide removal in the desulfurization of biogas in aerobic and anoxic biotrickling filters. Chem. Eng. J. 2012, 200, 237–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Calbry-Muzyka, A.S.; Gantenbein, A.; Schneebeli, J.; Frei, A.; Knorpp, A.J.; Schildhauer, T.J.; Biollaz, S.M.A. Deep removal of sulfur and trace organic compounds from biogas to protect a catalytic methanation reactor. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 360, 577–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Dannesboe, C.; Hansen, J.B.; Johannsen, I. Removal of sulfur contaminants from biogas to enable direct catalytic methanation. Biomass Conv. Bioref. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Svensson, S. Minimizing the Sulphur Content in Kraft Lignin. Master’s Thesis, Mälardalen University, Västerås, Sweden, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  27. Feilberg, A.; Liu, D.; Adamsen, A.P.S.; Hansen, M.J.; Jonassen, K.E.N. Odorant Emissions from Intensive Pig Production Measured by Online Proton-Transfer-Reaction Mass Spectrometry. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44, 5894–5900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Merdy, P.; Guillon, E.; Aplincourt, M.; Dumonceau, J.; Vezin, H. Copper sorption on a straw lignin: Experiments and EPR characterization. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2002, 245, 24–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Abbadessa, A.; Oinonen, P.; Henriksson, G. Characterization of Two Novel Bio-based Materials from Pulping Process Side Streams: Ecohelix and CleanFlow Black Lignin. BioResources 2018, 13, 7606–7627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Harmita, H.; Karthikeyan, K.G.; Pan, X. Copper and cadmium sorption onto kraft and organosolv lignins. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100, 6183–6191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Mohan, D.; Pittman, C.U., Jr.; Steele, P.H. Single, binary and multi-component adsorption of copper and cadmium from aqueous solutions on Kraft lignin—A biosorbent. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2006, 297, 489–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Merdy, P.; Guillon, E.; Aplincourt, M.; Duomonceau, J. Interaction of metallic cations with lignins. Part 1: Stability of iron (III), manganese (II) and copper (II) complexes with phenolic lignin model compounds: Coumaric, ferulic and sinapic acids and coniferyl alcohol. J. Chem. Res. 2000, 2000, 76–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Badruddoza, A.Z.M.; Tay, A.S.H.; Tan, P.Y.; Hidajat, K.; Uddin, M.S. Carboxymethyl-β-cyclodextrin conjugated magnetic nanoparticles as nano-adsorbents for removal of copper ions: Synthesis and adsorption studies. J. Hazard. Mater. 2011, 185, 1177–1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Pajchel, L.; Kolodziejski, W. Solid-state MAS NMR, TEM, and TGA studies of structural hydroxyl groups and water in nanocrystalline apatites prepared by dry milling. J. Nanoparticle Res. 2013, 15, 1868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Nikolic, M.; Nguyen, H.D.; Daugaard, A.E.; Löf, D.; Mortensen, K.; Barsberg, S.; Sanadi, A.R. Influence of surface modified nano silica on alkyd binder before and after accelerated weathering. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2016, 126, 134–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Roonasi, P.; Holmgren, A. A Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) study of oleate adsorbed on magnetite nano-particle surface. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2009, 255, 5891–5895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ház, A.; Jablonský, M.; Šurina, I.; Kačík, F.; Bubeníková, T.; Ďurkovič, J. Chemical Composition and Thermal Behavior of Kraft Lignins. Forests 2019, 10, 483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Todorciuc, T.; Bulgariu, L.; Popa, V.I. Adsorption of cu(ii) from aqueous solution on wheat straw lignin: Equilibrium and kinetic studies. Cell. Chem. Technol. 2015, 49, 439–447. [Google Scholar]
  39. Sciban, M.; Klasnja, M. Study of the Adsorption of Copper(II) Ions from Water onto Wood Sawdust, Pulp and Lignin. Adsorpt. Sci. Technol. 2016, 22, 195–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Šćiban, M.B.; Klašnja, M.T.; Antov, M.G. Study of the biosorption of different heavy metal ions onto Kraft lignin. Ecol. Eng. 2011, 37, 2092–2095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Miller-Chou, B.A.; Koenig, J.L. A review of polymer dissolution. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2003, 28, 1223–1270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Sun, Y.; Kunc, F.; Balhara, V.; Coleman, B.; Kodra, O.; Raza, M.; Chen, M.; Brinkmann, A.; Lopinski, G.P.; Johnston, L.J. Quantification of amine functional groups on silica nanoparticles: A multi-method approach. Nanoscale Adv. 2019, 1, 1598–1607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Motschi, H. Correlation of EPR-parameters with thermodynamic stability constants for copper(II) complexes Cu(II)-EPR as a probe for the surface complexation at the water/oxide interface. Colloids Surf. 1984, 9, 333–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Cariati, F.; Erre, L.; Micera, G.; Panzanelli, A.; Ciani, G.; Sironi, A. Interaction of metal ions with humic-like models. Part. I. Synthesis, spectroscopic and structural properties of diaquabis(2,6-dihydroxybenzoato) copper(II) and hexaaquaM(II) bis(2,6-dihydroxybenzoate) dihydrate (M = Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu and Zn). Inorganica Chim. Acta 1983, 80, 57–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Abdelaziz, O.Y.; Ravi, K.; Mittermeier, F.; Meier, S.; Riisager, A.; Lidén, G.; Hulteberg, C.P. Oxidative Depolymerization of Kraft Lignin for Microbial Conversion. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 11640–11652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Ghavidel, N.; Fatehi, P. Synergistic effect of lignin incorporation into polystyrene for producing sustainable superadsorbent. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 17639–17652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Klapiszewski, Ł.; Wysokowski, M.; Majchrzak, I.; Szatkowski, T.; Nowacka, M.; Siwińska-Stefańska, K.; Szwarc-Rzepka, K.; Bartczak, P.; Ehrlich, H.; Jesionowski, T. Preparation and Characterization of Multifunctional Chitin/Lignin Materials. J. Nanomater. 2013, 2013, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Ibrahim, H.S.; Ammar, N.S.; Abdel Ghafar, H.H.; Farahat, M. Adsorption of Cd(II), Cu(II) and Pb(II) using recycled waste glass: Equilibrium and kinetic studies. Desalin. Water Treat. 2012, 48, 320–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Chiron, N.; Guilet, R.; Deydier, E. Adsorption of Cu(II) and Pb(II) onto a grafted silica: Isotherms and kinetic models. Water Res. 2003, 37, 3079–3086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Lee, J.Y.; Chen, C.H.; Cheng, S.; Li, H.Y. Adsorption of Pb(II) and Cu(II) metal ions on functionalized large-pore mesoporous silica. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 13, 65–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Bandosz, T.J. On the adsorption/oxidation of hydrogen sulfide on activated carbons at ambient temperatures. J Colloid Interface Sci 2002, 246, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Barelli, L.; Bidini, G.; de Arespacochaga, N.; Pérez, L.; Sisani, E. Biogas use in high temperature fuel cells: Enhancement of KOH-KI activated carbon performance toward H2S removal. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2017, 42, 10341–10353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Li, Z.; Ge, Y.; Wan, L. Fabrication of a green porous lignin-based sphere for the removal of lead ions from aqueous media. J. Hazard. Mater. 2015, 285, 77–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Perez-Cantu, L.; Liebner, F.; Smirnova, I. Preparation of aerogels from wheat straw lignin by cross-linking with oligo(alkylene glycol)-α,ω-diglycidyl ethers. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2014, 195, 303–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Tian, J.; Ren, S.; Fang, G.; Ma, Y.; Ai, Q. Preparation and Performance of Dimethyl-Acetoxy-(2-Carboxymethyl Ether)-Lignin Ammonium Chloride Amphoteric Surfactant. BioResources 2014, 9, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Ge, Y.; Qin, L.; Li, Z. Lignin microspheres: An effective and recyclable natural polymer-based adsorbent for lead ion removal. Mater. Des. 2016, 95, 141–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Qin, L.; Ge, Y.; Deng, B.; Li, Z. Poly (ethylene imine) anchored lignin composite for heavy metals capturing in water. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2017, 71, 84–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Wellinger, A.; Lindberg, A. Biogas Upgrading and Utilization. IEA Bionergy. Task 24. 2000. Available online: http://www.iea-biogas.net/files/daten-redaktion/download/publi-task37/Biogas%20upgrading.pdf (accessed on 1 September 2020).
  59. Sitthikhankaew, R.; Chadwick, D.; Assabumrungrat, S.; Laosiripojana, N. Effects of humidity, O2, and CO2 on H2S adsorption onto upgraded and KOH impregnated activated carbons. Fuel Process. Technol. 2014, 124, 249–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Majeski, M.W.; Bolotin, I.L.; Hanley, L. Cluster beam deposition of Cu2-XS nanoparticles into organic thin films. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 12901–12908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Silvester, E.J.; Grieser, F.; Sexton, B.A.; Healy, T.W. Spectroscopic studies on copper sulfide sols. Langmuir 1991, 7, 2917–2922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Biesinger, M.C.; Hart, B.R.; Polack, R.; Kobe, B.A.; Smart, R.S.C. Analysis of mineral surface chemistry in flotation separation using imaging XPS. Miner. Eng. 2007, 20, 152–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Kundu, M.; Hasegawa, T.; Terabe, K.; Yamamoto, K.; Aono, M. Structural studies of copper sulfide films: Effect of ambient atmosphere. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 2008, 9, 35011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Mott, D.; Yin, J.; Engelhard, M.; Loukrakpam, R.; Chang, P.; Miller, G.; Bae, I.-T.; Chandra Das, N.; Wang, C.; Luo, J.; et al. From Ultrafine Thiolate-Capped Copper Nanoclusters toward Copper Sulfide Nanodiscs: A Thermally Activated Evolution Route. Chem. Mater. 2010, 22, 261–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Moulder, J.; Stickle, W.; Sobol, P. Handbook of X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy; Chastain, K.B.J., Ed.; Perkin-Elmer Corporation: Waltham, MA, USA, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  66. Guillon, E.; Merdy, P.; Aplincourt, M.; Dumonceau, J.; Vezin, H. Structural Characterization and Iron(III) Binding Ability of Dimeric and Polymeric Lignin Models. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2001, 239, 39–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds are not available from the authors.
Molecules 25 05577 g001 550
Figure 1. Thermogravimetric analysis for kraft lignin (KL) and the samples with adsorbed copper.
Figure 1. Thermogravimetric analysis for kraft lignin (KL) and the samples with adsorbed copper.
Molecules 25 05577 g001
Molecules 25 05577 g002 550
Figure 2. (a) Adsorption curves of H2S for the silica particles (orange line) and a blend of silica and kraft lignin particles with (red line) and without (black line) adsorbed copper. (b) Continuation of the experiment for the blend of particles with adsorbed copper (red line).
Figure 2. (a) Adsorption curves of H2S for the silica particles (orange line) and a blend of silica and kraft lignin particles with (red line) and without (black line) adsorbed copper. (b) Continuation of the experiment for the blend of particles with adsorbed copper (red line).
Molecules 25 05577 g002
Molecules 25 05577 g003 550
Figure 3. The (a) copper 2p3/2 and (b) sulfur 2p3/2,1/2 X-ray photoelectron spectra of the silica sample after H2S adsorption. CPS: Counts per second, BE: Binding Energy.
Figure 3. The (a) copper 2p3/2 and (b) sulfur 2p3/2,1/2 X-ray photoelectron spectra of the silica sample after H2S adsorption. CPS: Counts per second, BE: Binding Energy.
Molecules 25 05577 g003
Molecules 25 05577 g004 550
Figure 4. The (a) copper 2p3/2 and (b) sulfur 2p3/2,1/2 X-ray photoelectron spectra of porous silica/KL precipitated from the solution/Cu(II) sample after H2S adsorption.
Figure 4. The (a) copper 2p3/2 and (b) sulfur 2p3/2,1/2 X-ray photoelectron spectra of porous silica/KL precipitated from the solution/Cu(II) sample after H2S adsorption.
Molecules 25 05577 g004
Table
Table 1. H2S adsorption capacities in milligrams per gram of adsorbent material for copper-adsorbed silica, copper-adsorbed kraft lignin particles, and copper-adsorbed kraft lignin obtained via precipitation from a solution, which was tested at low and high relative humidities.
Table 1. H2S adsorption capacities in milligrams per gram of adsorbent material for copper-adsorbed silica, copper-adsorbed kraft lignin particles, and copper-adsorbed kraft lignin obtained via precipitation from a solution, which was tested at low and high relative humidities.
SampleH2S Adsorption Capacity (mg/g)
Low Relative Humidity (14% RH) High Relative Humidity (90–100% RH)
Porous silica/Cu(II)0.62 ± 0.020.38 ± 0.05
KL particles/Cu(II)0.90 ± 0.390.52 ± 0.11
KL precipitated from solution/Cu(II)2.05 ± 0.401.80 ± 0.60
Table
Table 2. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy data for adsorbent materials after H2S removal.
Table 2. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy data for adsorbent materials after H2S removal.
SampleCu 2p3/2S 2p3/2Cu (LMM *)
Porous silica/Cu(II) 932.4, 933.5162.7568.4, 571.7
Porous silica/Cu(II) (adsorption at 90–100% RH) 932.4, 933.5162.9568.9, 572.3
Porous silica/KL precipitated from solution/Cu(II) 933.1163.8571.6
Porous silica/KL precipitated from solution/Cu(II) (adsorption at 90–100% RH) 933.6164.0571.6
* LMM = Auger transition.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nikolic, M.; Cáceres Najarro, M.; Johannsen, I.; Iruthayaraj, J.; Ceccato, M.; Feilberg, A. Copper Adsorption on Lignin for the Removal of Hydrogen Sulfide. Molecules 2020, 25, 5577. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25235577

AMA Style

Nikolic M, Cáceres Najarro M, Johannsen I, Iruthayaraj J, Ceccato M, Feilberg A. Copper Adsorption on Lignin for the Removal of Hydrogen Sulfide. Molecules. 2020; 25(23):5577. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25235577

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nikolic, Miroslav, Marleny Cáceres Najarro, Ib Johannsen, Joseph Iruthayaraj, Marcel Ceccato, and Anders Feilberg. 2020. "Copper Adsorption on Lignin for the Removal of Hydrogen Sulfide" Molecules 25, no. 23: 5577. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25235577

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop