Next Article in Journal
Biotechnological Transformation of Hydrocortisone into 16α-Hydroxyprednisolone by Coupling Arthrobacter simplex and Streptomyces roseochromogenes
Next Article in Special Issue
Membrane-Supported Layered Coordination Polymer as an Advanced Sustainable Catalyst for Desulfurization
Previous Article in Journal
Tannin-Based Hybrid Materials and Their Applications: A Review
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Application of NF Polymeric Membranes for Removal of Multicomponent Heat-Stable Salts (HSS) Ions from Methyl Diethanolamine (MDEA) Solutions

Molecules 2020, 25(21), 4911; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25214911
by Asma Ghorbani 1, Behrouz Bayati 1,*, Teresa Poerio 2,*, Pietro Argurio 3, Tavan Kikhavani 1, Marzieh Namdari 4 and Licínio M. Ferreira 5
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3:
Molecules 2020, 25(21), 4911; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25214911
Submission received: 2 July 2020 / Revised: 2 October 2020 / Accepted: 21 October 2020 / Published: 23 October 2020

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

attached

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Dear reviewer, a point-by-point reply to your comments can be found in the attached file.

The authors are grateful to the reviewer for helping to improve the quality of the work.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Natural gas sweetening is important. Amine absorption method is currently the dominating method for the application; however, it is also limited by a number of challenges. The authors pursue to address one of them, heat-stable salts (HSS) removal, using NF membranes. This work is publishable if the authors can address the following concerns.

  1. Membranes are used to separate HSS from amine solution for natural gas sweetening, while had the authors considered to remove H2S and CO2 directly from natural gas using membranes? It will be more promising to completely replace the amine scrubber using membranes, which will be more energy efficient.
  2.  The authors propose to use a extremely high pressure, >70 bar, but this will cause a huge amount of extra energy input, capital cost etc. The authors may need to consider this aspect for the future application of their approach.
  3.  In Fig. 7, the membrane's permeate and retentate are illustrated wrongly

Author Response

Dear reviewer, a point-by-point reply to your comments can be found in the attached file.

The authors are grateful to the reviewer for helping to improve the quality of the work.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

This article concerns with ion rejections containing amine solution through a polyamide NF membrane. The research field is suitable to the Molecules. The data and the discussions are original. However, there is a lack of specific description especially for the osmotic pressures or the concentration polarization. I think this article requires major revision for publication to the Molecules.

 

P4 line 160: The “osmotic pressure” should be specified. The extrapolation to the flux at 0 shown in the Figure 2 must be the same to the osmotic pressure.

 

P6 line 195: The concentration polarization should be calculated. It is hard to believe the following sentences without the calculation.

 

P7 line 209: In order to discuss the Donnan exclusion, the ion strength of the solution should be noted.

 

Figure 3: The stability of the membranes should be noted. Especially the data after the high pressure permeation tests are preferred.

 

Author Response

Dear reviewer, a point-by-point reply to your comments can be found in the attached file.

The authors are grateful to the reviewer for helping to improve the quality of the work.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 3 Report

The revision is enough for publication in the Molecules.

Back to TopTop