Next Article in Journal
In Vitro Hormetic Effect Investigation of Thymol on Human Fibroblast and Gastric Adenocarcinoma Cells
Previous Article in Journal
Quantification of Veterinary Antibiotics in Pig and Poultry Feces and Liquid Manure as a Non-Invasive Method to Monitor Antibiotic Usage in Livestock by Liquid Chromatography Mass-Spectrometry
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Theoretical Investigation on Molecular Structure and Electronic Properties of BxLiy Cluster for Lithium-Ion Batteries with Quantum ESPRESSO Program

by
Mustafa Ali Çipiloğlu
* and
Ali Özkurt
Department of Physics, Faculty of art and Sciences, Manisa Celal Bayar University, TR-145140 Manisa, Turkey
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2020, 25(14), 3266; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25143266
Submission received: 31 May 2020 / Revised: 13 July 2020 / Accepted: 14 July 2020 / Published: 17 July 2020

Abstract

:
In this study, molecular structure and electronic properties of eleven BxLiy (x = 1–3, y = 1–3) clusters are examined using the Perdew, Burke and Ernezerhof (PBE) method in the Quantum ESPRESSO program. Three main groups, consisting of two atoms, three atoms and four atoms, are selected as the starting points. The stable configurations, their binding energies per atom (Eb), dissociation energy (ΔE), and the second difference in energy (Δ2E), HOMO-LUMO (HOMO: Highest Occupied Molecular Orbital LUMO: Lowest Occupied Molecular Orbital) gaps, total energy, frequency, force on atom, point group, bond length, density of state (DOS) and band structures are investigated for BxLiy (x = 1–3, y = 1–3) clusters. The results of binding energies (Eb), dissociation energy (ΔE) and the second difference in energy (Δ2E) show that BLi, BLi2 first isomer, BLi2 second isomer, B2Li2 first isomer, B2Li2 second isomer and BLi3 are the most stable among all 11 molecules of BxLiy (x = 1–3, y = 1–3). The stability of BxLiy (x = 1–3, y = 1–3) clusters depend on both the formation of geometrical structures on the number of Li atoms. As the number of Li atoms in the group increases, the stability of BxLiy clusters also increases. Within each group formation of geometrical structures, the stability of BxLiy clusters changes. It is observed that they may change the capability of chemical reactions in BxLiy clusters.

1. Introduction

Depletion of fossil energy resources together with severe air pollution are the main reasons why the present world requires a sustainable green energy strategy. Reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change clearly showed that a healthy and sustainable environment can only be achieved by supporting clean energy systems. Therefore, experimental and theoretical studies of atomic and molecular clusters have been performed in recent decades for the solution of these problems [1,2,3,4,5,6].
Tailoring of the new materials is a main focus of the researchers. Experimentally, one can tailor new materials from the known empirical data, but most of the researchers carry this out on a trial and error basis. Theoretical simulation is one of the most promising strategies to design and predict new materials and is also a boon for experimental researchers. In view of this, researchers focused on condensed matter physics. Because on this, different physical and chemical properties, atomic and molecular behavior patterns of materials could be actively researched. Nowadays, structures with different geometrical and electronic features are mixed and examined by experimental and theoretical studies [7,8]. Some examples of chemically stable hydrogen storage systems based on boron atom are given in Refs. [9,10]. If we can categorize these new materials, which have more hydrogen storage capability, we can classify eight different groups. These are aluminum nitride nanostructures, transition-metal doped boron nitride systems, alkali-metal-doped benzenoid, Lithium-boron clusters, fullerene clusters, light metal and transition-metal-coated boron Bucky balls, B80 and magnesium clusters [11].
Lithium is the lightest metal under normal conditions, and it is a member of alkali metals on the periodic table. It is the best point for a theoretical understanding the physical and chemical properties of metal clusters. Additionally, Lithium can make different heterogeneous clusters with other elements. There are two sub-units of the doped Lithium clusters. The first one is Lithium monoxide (LinO) cluster and the second one is the lithium monocarbide (LinC) cluster [12]. The practical significance of Li-B alloys is as anode materials for the production of lithium batteries. Because of this reason the B-doped lithium clusters have been widely studied. However, contrarily, LinO and LinC clusters are more well-known than B-doped Li clusters [12].
Wang et al. [13] proposed a crystalline structure for Li5B4 based on X-ray and neutron powder diffraction data, which they confirmed by performing nuclear magnetic resonance measurements. Based on the known atomic (metallic) radii of Li and B, they concluded that the actual Li-Li distances in Li5B4 are slightly larger than 2.44 Å and the B-B distances are slightly smaller than 1.41 Å. Therefore, Wang et al. observed that the approximate inter-atom distances in Li5B4 for Li and B are 13–16% shorter than the corresponding inter-atom distances in their metallic state [14]. In the irregular state, they assumed that the distances between atoms within and between four-faced sets are 2.44 Å and 2.67 Å, respectively [14].
Early borides of the alkali metals (NaB6) were prepared in 1963 [15]. Additionally, LiB4 was claimed in a French patent [16]. However, the existence of LiB6 has been suggested [17] and more recently confirmed experimentally [18]. The compounds LiB2 and LiB6 are reported to have been prepared under pressure at temperatures in excess of 1400 °C [19]. It has also been reported [20,21] that a compound containing about 32% Li exists in the Li-B system. All these Li-B compounds are blackish powders, except LiB2 and LiB6, which are reported to be golden yellow and bluish black, respectively [19]. All of them are fragile and stable in the air.
From this point of view, Meden et al. computed structures and energetics of the boron-lithium clusters at the SCF/6-31G (d) level [22]. The theoretical investigations on structures, bonding and stabilities of hyperlithiated borides were reported by Nguyen et al. [23,24]. They found BLi6 clusters to be most stable among BLin clusters on the basis of B3LYP cohesive energies of Li and Li2 elimination reactions. Bandaru et al. investigated the ability of neutral and cationic BxLiy (x = 2–6, y = 1, 2) systems as effective hydrogen-trapping materials at the MP2 level of theory using the 6-311+G (d,p) basis set [11]. Additionally, the lowest energy structures and electronics properties of the BLin (n = 1–7) clusters were investigated using the B3LYP, MP2 and CCSD (T) methods with the aug-cc-pVDZ basis set [12].
In this study, we obtained the stable configurations of BxLiy (x = 1–3, y = 1–3) clusters using the Perdew, Burke and Ernezerhof (PBE) method in the Quantum ESPRESSO program, and used the Chemcraft graphical program for all our clusters and the binding energies per atom (Eb), dissociation energy (ΔE), the second difference in energy (Δ2E), HOMO-LUMO gaps, total energy, frequency, force on atom, point group, bond length, density of state (DOS) and band structures for these BxLiy (x = 1–3, y = 1–3) clusters.

2. Computational and Mathematical Details

Initially, BxLiy (x = 1–3, y = 1–3) clusters have been examined with four methods and two program packages. The Perdew, Burke and Ernezerhof (PBE) method has been studied with the Quantum-ESPRESSO program package. Quantum-ESPRESSO is an abbreviation for Quantum opEn-Source Package for Research in Electronic Structure, Simulation and Optimization. It should be noted that Quantum-ESPRESSO is more efficient for large clusters and extended system wave-function expansions in plane waves [25,26]. We used the Chemcraft graphical program for all our clusters. Chemcraft is a graphical program for working with quantum chemistry computations. It is a convenient tool for visualizing computed results and preparing new jobs for a calculation [27]; moreover, we used BURAI 1.3 for the clusters of Band Structure and DOS graphics [28]. In the computational chemistry, a coupled cluster is a common Post-Hartree-Fock ab-initio method. It expands the multi-electron wavefunction for electron correlation. This method is used for the most correct calculations for small or medium clusters. The PBE functional is a member of the class of generalized gradient approximation (GGA) functional for the exchange correlation energy; PBE developed one example of such a parameter-free GGA functional. It is known for its general applicability and it gives rather accurate results for a wide range of systems [29]. There exist hundreds of the GGA functional. The most famous are the B88 exchange functional and LYP correlation functional and PBE functional [30,31,32].
E x c G G A [ n , n ] =   d 3 r   e x c G G A ( n ( r ) , n ( r ) , n ( r ) , n ( r ) )
E x P B E =   d 3 r   e x u n i f ( n ) [ 1 + κ κ 1 + β π 2 s 2 / 3 κ ]
E c P B E =   d 3 r   [ e c u n i f ( n ) + n c 0 ϕ 3 l n { 1 + ( 1 + A t 2 ) β t 2 / c 0 1 + A t 2 + A 2 t 4 } ]
s ( r ) = | n ( r ) | 2 n ( r ) k F ( r ) ,           t ( r ) = | n ( r ) | 2 n ( r ) k s ( r ) ,       k s = 4 k F / π
Binding energies per atom (Eb), dissociation energy (ΔE), the second difference in energy (Δ2E), HOMO-LUMO gaps, total energy, force on atom, point group, bond length (Å), frequency, density of state (DOS) and band structures were calculated for BxLiy (x = 1–3, y = 1–3) clusters. The HOMO-LUMO difference energy was also calculated by taking the difference between the HOMO energy and the LUMO energy. A minimal HOMO-LUMO difference means that these nanostructures electrons can pass into LUMO orbitals with smaller electrically potential energy or smaller photon energy. In the optimized clusters the binding energy per atoms formula are computed by using the Equation (5). Lastly, Boron-Lithium clusters were compared. We found that as the number of atoms in clusters decrease, the binding energy per atoms increase due to that the bond making capabilities of boron atoms are greater than Lithium atoms. The dissociation energy means that the energy is needed to break every chemical bond in a molecule and completely separate all atoms. The dissociation energy and the second difference in energy are computed for Boron-Lithium clusters using Equations (6) and (7):
E (BxLiy) = [x. E(B) + y. E(Li) − E (BxLiy)]/x + y + 1
ΔE (BxLiy) = E (BxLiy) − [E (BxLiy) + E (Li)]
2E (BxLiy) = [E (BxLiy+1) + E (BxLiy-1)] − 2E (BxLiy)

3. Structures and Stabilities of BxLiy (x = 1–3, y = 1–3) Clusters

The BxLiy (x = 1–3, y = 1–3) clusters have been selected, with three main groups: two atoms, three atoms and four atoms. We have created 11 different BxLiy clusters. The optimized geometries parameters (bond lengths), in accordance with the atom numbers of Figure 1, of the most stable structures are given in Table 1. The lowest energy structures of BxLiy (x = 1–3, y = 1–3) clusters were created based off of 11 molecules using PBE.

3.1. The BxLiy (x = 1–3, y = 1–3) Clusters of Diatomic Group

The BLi molecule is formed by boron and lithium atoms (Figure 1a) The BLi molecule has a very simple geometric form with an average bond length of 2.437 Å. It has Cv symmetry. The binding energy per atom, total energy, force on atom and HOMO-LUMO gap information of the BLi molecule are given in Table 2.

3.2. The BxLiy (x = 1–3, y = 1–3) Clusters of Triple Group

BLi2 first isomer, BLi2 second isomer, B2Li first isomer and B2Li second isomer are formed of this group. The initial structure of the BLi2 first isomer was made up of two lithium atoms and one boron atom (Figure 1a–c). The BLi2 first isomer has a linear geometric form with a 180° angle. The B-Li average bond length is 2.207 Å and Li-Li distance is 4.414 Å. It has Dh symmetry. BLi2 second isomer is brought forth by two lithium atoms and one boron atom with an angle of 77.84°. This molecule geometry is different from BLi2 first isomer. The B-Li average bond length is 2.324 Å and Li-Li distance is 2.921 Å. It has C2V symmetry.
B2Li first isomer was created with two boron atoms and one lithium atom in Figure 1e,f. It has a linear geometric form with almost a 180° angle and its geometric form is the same form of BLi2 first isomer. The B-Li average distance is 2.113 Å and the bond length among boron atoms is 1.617 Å. Symmetry of this molecule is CS. Additionally, B2Li second isomer is made up of two boron atoms and one lithium atom with a triangle geometric structure, and the angles of the molecule are 69.56°, 69.73° and 40.71°. The B-Li average bond length is 2.263 Å and the B-B average bond length is 1.568 Å. It has CS symmetry. The BxLiy (x = 1–3, y = 1–3) clusters of the three atoms group of two molecules are first and second isomers of BLi2 molecules and they correspond to a much deeper position on the potential energy surface. This result is also supported by the HOMO-LUMO gap value of these clusters. The HOMO-LUMO energy gap can be used as a measure of chemical hardness, which describes the resistance for a change or deformation of structure [33]. On the other hand, a large HOMO-LUMO energy gap is more stable than a molecule that has a smaller HOMO-LUMO energy gap. For this reason, when we compared four clusters, BLi2 first isomer and BLi2 second isomer are the most stable molecules within this group. This result has shown in Figure 1; the total energy, force on atom, point group, binding energy per atom, frequency and HOMO-LUMO gap are presented in Table 2 and Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 4.

3.3. The BxLiy (x = 1–3, y = 1–3) Clusters of Quadrate Group

As shown in Figure 1, there are six molecules, which have four atoms among 11 molecules (Figure 1d,g–k). These six molecules are BLi3, B2Li2 first isomer, B2Li2 second isomer, B2Li2 third isomer, B3Li first isomer and B3Li second isomer. BLi3 consists of one boron atom and three lithium atoms. The boron atom forms the central atom in this molecule. In addition, three lithium atoms are located in the vicinity of the central atom and are bonded with the boron atom. BLi3 is a planar kite-like geometry and can be viewed as a distorted Li4 structure, where B impurity substitutes one Li atom. The average bond length of the B-Li cluster is 2.202 Å and the average distance is 3.606 Å among lithium atoms. The angles of BLi3 molecule are 178.67°, 89.34° and 98.34°. It has C1 symmetry. In this group, BLi3 is the molecule with the second smallest HOMO-LUMO energy gap. B2Li2 first isomer consists of two boron atoms and two lithium atoms. Because of the geometric structure, boron atoms are positioned as central atoms with Lithium atoms at the right side and left side of central atoms. Lithium atoms are located with angled atoms. This molecule consists of four B-Li bonds and one B-B bond. The average B-Li bond length is 2.180 Å, and the B-B bond length is 1.528 Å; lastly, the distance between the two lithium atoms is 3.258 Å. B2Li2 first isomer has eight different angles (two different 101.99° angles (Li-B-Li), two different 41.29° angles (B-Li-B) and four different 69.35°(angles Li-B-B)). B2Li2 first isomer has C1 symmetry. With regard to HOMO-LUMO energy gap, B2Li2 first isomer is the second largest of HOMO-LUMO energy gap (Figure 1). This means that B2Li2 first isomer is the second most stable molecule of this group.
B2Li2 second isomer has a linear geometric form with two boron atoms and two lithium atoms. Two boron atoms are in the center of the molecule and two lithium atoms are located at the left and right side of the molecule. This molecule formed with three bonds, which are two boron-lithium bonds and one bond of B-B atoms. Additionally, the molecule has a 180° angle. The average B-Li bond length is 2.087 Å and the B-B bond length is 1.596 Å. Additionally, the distance between lithium atoms is 5.770 Å. It has Dh symmetry. The HOMO-LUMO gap of B2Li2 second isomer was calculated as zero. This value is the smallest HOMO-LUMO energy gap in all 11 BxLiy clusters. It is understood that the cluster of this molecule will be the most reactive. B2Li2 third isomer is similar to B2Li2 first isomer. Two boron atoms were formed the central atoms. One lithium atom was located at the right side and the other lithium atom was located at the left side. All the atoms are in the same plane geometrically. It has four boron-lithium bonds and one boron-boron bond, with a total of five bonds. The average bond length of B-Li cluster is 2.455 Å and the B-B bond length is 1.639 Å. In addition, the distance between the lithium atoms is 4.6298 Å. B2Li2 third isomer has eight angles (two 55.07° and 57.36° angles (B-Li-B), four 61.00°, 63.93°, 59.64° and 63.00° angles (Li-B-B) and two 120.64° and 126.93° angles (Li-B-Li). The molecule has C2V symmetry group. B2Li2 third isomer is the third largest of HOMO-LUMO energy gap.
B3Li first isomer has a linear geometric structure as BLi2 first isomer; for B2Li2 second isomer, one boron atom is positioned to the left side of the cluster and the lithium atom is positioned to the right side of the cluster. Two other boron atoms are placed linearly between the lithium and boron atoms. The molecule has a 180° band angle, two boron-boron bonds and one boron-lithium bond. Boron-boron average bond length is 2.305 Å and boron-lithium bond length is 1.618 Å. It has CV symmetry. This molecule has the third smallest HOMO-LUMO energy gap. B3Li second isomer has a triangle pyramid geometric structure. As a result of this, the molecule has the largest HOMO-LUMO energy gap. B3Li second isomer structure has six bonds and 12 bond angles: three boron lithium bond angles of 40.07°, 40.04° and 40.04° (B-Li-B), three boron bond angles of 60.00°, 60.01° and 59.99° (B-B-B) and six boron lithium bond angles consisting of two 69.98° angles (B-B-Li), one 70.11° angle (B-B-Li), one 70.10° angle (Li-B-B), one 69.96° angle (Li-B-B), one 69.86° angle (B-B-Li) and one 69.85° angle (B-B-Li). It has C1 symmetry. The B-Li average bond length is 2.269 Å and the B-B average bond length is 1.545 Å.

4. Electronic Properties of BxLiy (x = 1–3, y = 1–3) Cluster

4.1. The Second Difference in Energy (Δ2E) and Dissociation Energy (ΔE)

The second Difference in Energy (Δ2E) shows the same value except for B2Li2 third isomer and B3Li first and second isomers. B3Li first isomer has the highest value of Δ2E among all molecules. The dissociation energy for first eight molecules does not change significantly and dissociation energy values were close to zero. The dissociation energy shows a sharp decrease for B3Li first isomer. After combining the second difference in energy and dissociation energy results, BLi, BLi2 first isomer, BLi2 second isomer, B2Li2 first isomer, B2Li2 second isomer, and BLi3 actually show the greatest stability among the 11 clusters studied (Figure 5, Figure 6 and Figure 7).

4.2. Binding Energy per Atoms

BLi, BLi2 first isomer, BLi2 second isomer and BLi3 have one boron atom in each molecule, while B2Li first isomer, B2Li second isomer, B2Li2 first isomer, B2Li2 second isomer and B2Li2 third isomer have two boron atoms in each molecule. B3Li first isomer and B3Li second isomer have three boron atoms in each molecule. The binding energy per atom value is different; B3Li first isomer has the highest value and BLi has the smallest value of the 11 molecules for the binding energy per atom. Consequently, the binding energy per atom values is increased with the boron atom number depending on the geometrical structure of each molecule (Figure 5)

4.3. Total Energy (eV)

When the total energies of the 11 clusters (which were classified into a diatomic, triple and quaternary atom group) are examined, it is seen that BLi has the smallest total energy in all clusters. In the triple atomic group, B2Li first isomer has the smallest total energy and BLi2 second isomer has the highest total energy within the group. In the quaternary atomic group, BLi3 has the highest total energy and B3Li second isomer has the smallest total energy. It can be said that the total energy decreases as the number of Li atom increases, depending on the geometrical shape of molecule.

4.4. HOMO-LUMO Gap

In molecules when light of a high energy is absorbed by an electron in the HOMO, it jumps to the LUMO. For this reason, the energy difference between HOMO and LUMO is termed the HOMO-LUMO gap. HOMO and LUMO are sometimes called frontier orbitals in frontier molecular orbital theory, and we can understand that the difference in energy between these two frontier orbitals can be used to predict the strength and stability of metal complexes. B2Li2 second isomer has the smallest HOMO-LUMO gap and B3Li second isomer has the highest HOMO-LUMO gap. Eventually, the HOMO-LUMO different energies are affected by the geometric structure of molecules and numbers of boron atoms and lithium atoms in the molecules.

4.5. Fermi Energy (eV)

The Fermi energy is a notion in quantum mechanics. It generally refers to the energy distinction between the highest occupied and lowest occupied single-particle states in a quantum system of non-interacting fermions at absolute zero temperature. It is changed by the boron atom and the lithium atom, number of molecules and the geometric shape of molecules.

4.6. Force on Atom (eV/Å)

The atom consists of three important particles—protons, neutrons and electrons. There are four forces that account for the behavior of the three important particles, and thus, they keep the atom together. The names of these four forces are electromagnetic, gravity, strong and weak interactions. Electromagnetism is a force that amalgamates the effects of electrical charge and magnetism. The electromagnetic force can either attract or repel the particles on which it acts. Opposite-charged particles attract each other, while, same-charged particles repel each other. For example, electrons are kept in the orbit around the nucleus with this force, because the nucleus in the center of the atom is positively charged and attracts the negatively charged electrons. The strong force keeps the protons together to form the nucleus. This goes against the electromagnetic force of repulsion between protons. The atom is held together by both the strong forces and the electromagnetic forces. Weak force is an important force; it stabilizes particles through the process of radioactive decay, in which a neutron in the nucleus changes into a proton and an electron. Inside the nucleus of an atom, the effect of gravity is small compared to the effects of the other three forces. For this reason, gravity is the weakest of the four forces. We can notice that BLi2 first isomer has the smallest force value on the atom and B2Li2 third isomer has the largest force value on the atom. As a result of this information, B2Li2 third isomer is the most durable molecule. BLi2 first isomer is the weakest molecule.

5. Results and Discussion

The structures and geometrical parameters of the BxLiy (x = 1–3, y = 1–3) clusters at the PBE are presented in Figure 1. Total energies, frequencies, the binding energies per atom (Eb), HOMO-LUMO gaps, force on atom, point group and the bond lengths at PBE of all clusters are collected in Table 1 and Table 2. Density of state (DOS) and band structures are collected in Figure 8 and Figure 9. When our results are compared with the well-studied clusters by Nguyen et al. [23], Srinivas et al. [34] and Ying Li et al. [12], we can conclude that our calculations are correct and compatible. The calculated bond length of BLi is 2.141 Å at the QCISD (2.174 Å at the CCSD (T)). The BLi cluster has the largest BLi stretching vibrational frequency of 515 cm−1 among all BLin clusters, indicating a relatively stronger BLi bond than Ying Li et al. [12]. Additionally, the bond length of BLi is 2.416 Å at B3LYP (2.426 Å at UHF, 2.426 Å at MP2 and 2.425 Å at CASSCF) and the BLi stretching vibrational frequency is 425 cm−1 [23]. The BLi cluster has a very simple geometric form with an average bond length of 2.437 Å and a BLi stretching vibrational frequency of 428.919 cm−1 at PBE in our results. According to Ying Li et al. [12], BLi2 second isomer is at the apex, and the Li-Li distance of 2.802 Å is a bit longer than that of the Li dimer (2.727 Å at the CCSD (T)). The B-Li bond length is 2.299 Å at B3LYP (2.323 Å at MP2 and 2.359 Å at CCSD (T)). The B-Li stretching vibrational frequency is 408 cm−1. However, the Li-Li bond of BLi2 second isomer is 2.779 Å at B3LYP (2.706 Å at UHF, 2.734 Å at MP2 and 2.760 Å at CASSCF). The B-Li bond length is 2.317 Å at B3LYP (2.349 Å at UHF, 2.333 Å at MP2 and 2.365 Å at CASSCF) [23]. The BLi2 second isomer stretching vibrational frequency is 430 cm−1. BLi2 second isomer is made up of two lithium atoms and one boron atom with 77.84° angles at PBE. B-Li average bond length is 2.324 Å and Li-Li distance is 2.921 Å at PBE. The BLi2 second isomer stretching vibrational frequency is 420.81 cm−1 at PBE in our results. In accordance with Ying Li et al. [12] the Li-Li distance of BLi3 is 3.053 Å. The B-Li bond length is 2.158 Å at B3LYP (2.196 Å at MP2 and 2.230 Å at CCSD(T)). The B-Li stretching vibrational frequency is 401 cm−1. However, the B-Li bond length is 2.155 Å at B3LYP (2.182 Å at UHF, 2.172 Å at MP2 and 2.199 Å at CASSCF). The BLi3 stretching vibrational frequency is 582 cm−1, as shown by Nguyen et al. [23]. BLi3 has a planar kite-like geometry and can be viewed as a distorted Li4 structure, where B impurity substitutes one Li atom. The B-Li average bond length is 2.202 Å and the average distance is 3.606 Å among lithium atoms at PBE. The angles of the BLi3 molecule are 178.67°, 89.3° and 98.34° at PBE. The B-Li stretching vibrational frequency is 608.29 cm−1 at PBE in our results. The B-B bond distance of B2Li is 1.565 Å at B3LYP (1.547 Å at MP2, 1.583 Å at HF and 1.562 Å at CASSCF). In contrast, the B-Li distance of B2Li is 2.260 Å at B3LYP, (2.303 Å at MP2, 2.309 Å at HF and 2.294 Å at CASSCF). The B-B bond vibrational stretching frequency is 1118 cm−1 for B2Li and 1014 cm−1 for B2 at B3LYP. Total energy of B2Li is −56.56928 au at HF (−56.72242 au at MP2, −56.99109 au at B3LYP and −56.72824 au at CASSCF), as shown by Srinivas et al. [34]. B2Li second isomer is made up of two boron atoms and one lithium atom with a triangular geometric structure, and the angles of this molecule are 69.56°, 69.73° and 40.71°. The B-Li average bond length is 2.263 Å and the B-B average bond length is 1.568 Å at PBE. The total energy of B2Li second isomer is 359.81842 eV at PBE. The B-B bond vibrational stretching frequency is 1112.38 cm−1 at PBE in our results. The B-B bond distance of B2Li2 first isomer is 1.532 Å at B3LYP (1.530 Å at MP2, 1.548 Å at HF and 1.554 Å at CASSCF). Additionally, the B-Li average distances of B2Li2 first isomer is 2.188 Å at B3LYP (2.217 Å at MP2, 2.252 Å at HF and 2.219 Å at CASSCF). The Li-Li bond distances of B2Li2 first isomer is 3.352 Å at B3LYP (3.219 Å at MP2, 3.504 Å at HF and 3.382 Å at CASSCF). The total energy of B2Li2 first isomer is −64.06043 au at HF (−64.25728 au at MP2, −64.57928 au at B3LYP and −64.21198 au at CASSCF), as shown by Srinivas et al. [34]. B2Li2 first isomer consists of four B-Li bonds and one B-B bond. The B-Li average bond length is 2.180 Å and the B-B bond length is 1.528 Å; the distance between two Lithium atoms is 3.258 Å. B2Li2 first isomer has eight different angles (two different 101.99° angles (Li-B-Li), two different 41.29° angles (B-Li-B) and four different 69.35° angles (Li-B-B)) at PBE. The total energy of B2Li2 first isomer is 561.36346 eV at PBE. The B-B bond vibrational stretching frequency is 1170.00 cm−1 at PBE in our results. The B-B bond distance of B2Li2 third isomer is 1.532 Å at B3LYP (1.543 Å at MP2, 1.540 Å at HF and 1.551 Å at CASSCF). The B-Li average distances of B2Li2 third isomer is 2.156 Å at B3LYP (2.182 Å at MP2, 2.197 Å at HF and 2.177 Å at CASSCF). The total energy of B2Li2 third isomer is -64.04676 au at HF (−64.27386 au at MP2, −64.57507 au at B3LYP and −64.20757 au at CASSCF), as shown by Srinivas et al. [34]. B2Li2 third isomer has four boron-lithium bonds and one boron-boron bond, with a total of five bonds. The B-Li average bond length is 2.455 Å and the B-B bond length is 1.639 Å. In addition, the distance between lithium atoms is 4.6298 Å. B2Li2 third isomer has eight angles (two 55.07° and 57.36° angles (B-Li-B), four 61.00°, 63.93°, 59.64° and 63.00° angles (Li-B-B) and two 120.64°, 126.93° angles (Li-B-Li)) at PBE. The total energy of B2Li2 third isomer is 559.07518 eV at PBE. The B-B bond vibrational stretching frequency is 1148.02 cm−1 at PBE in our results. The B-B bond distance of B2Li2 second isomer is 1.600 Å at B3LYP and 1.602 Å at MP2, 1.591 Å at HF and 1.560 Å at CASSCF. The B-Li average distances of B2Li2 second isomer are 2.107 Å at B3LYP, 2.137 Å at MP2, 2.135 Å at HF and 2.142 Å at CASSCF. The total energy of B2Li2 second isomer is −64.05724 au at HF (−64.20792 au at MP2, −64.54499 au at B3LYP and −64.11602 au at CASSCF), as shown by Srinivas et al. [34]. B2Li2 second isomer is formed with three bonds, which are two boron-lithium bonds and one bond of B-B atoms. Additionally, the molecule has a 180° angle. The B-Li average bond length is 2.087 Å and the B-B bond length is 1.596 Å. Additionally, the distance between lithium atoms is 5.770 Å at PBE. The total energy of B2Li2 second isomer is 559.90784 eV at PBE. The B-B bond vibrational stretching frequency is 1171.04 cm−1 at PBE in our results.
The boron and lithium atoms make small clusters among them in the BxLiy cluster. In particular, Li atoms generally prefer to be close to other Li atoms, unless they are placed symmetrically around the boron clusters, which have shapes similar to the corresponding bare boron clusters. Additionally, depending on the number of lithium atoms and geometrical structure of molecules, an increase or decrease in the average bond length of the small boron clusters are observed. This means that lithium atoms stretch or compact small boron clusters. It appears that this stress also concerns the position of Li atoms and is formed when they are symmetrically located around a small group of boron. Furthermore, the number of Li atoms affects the stability of the cluster, i.e., as the number of Li atoms increases, the total energy of the cluster increases, while the HOMO–LUMO energy gap decreases. These results show that while the stability of the cluster reduces, the probability of the reactivity for the cluster increases with the number of Li atoms. Consequently, we can understand that all molecules have changed the capability of the chemical reaction. The obtained results of the binding energies (Eb), dissociation energy (ΔE) and the second difference in energy (Δ2E) show that BLi, BLi2 first isomer, BLi2 second isomer, B2Li2 first isomer, B2Li2 second isomer and BLi3 are the most stable among all 11 molecules of BxLiy (x = 1–3, y = 1–3). In addition, the obtained results of the Density of State (DOS) and Band structures show that the LiB clusters do not act as an expectation stability because of highly coordinated boron atoms. It was found that the stability of the molecules in these 11 molecules is changed with the molecule of the boron atoms and the lithium atoms number. Additionally, geometric structures can change the stability of the molecules.

6. Conclusions

In summary, the BxLiy (x = 1–3, y = 1–3) clusters were examined using the PBE method in the Quantum ESPRESSO program using the Chemcraft graphical program for all our clusters. The stable configurations, their binding energies per atom (Eb), dissociation energy (ΔE), the second difference in energy (Δ2E), HOMO-LUMO gaps, total energy, frequency, force on atom, point group, bond length, density of state (DOS) and band structures were investigated for these BxLiy (x = 1–3, y = 1–3) clusters. The obtained results of the binding energies (Eb), dissociation energy (ΔE) and the second difference in energy (Δ2E) show that BLi, BLi2 first isomer, BLi2 second isomer, B2Li2 first isomer, B2Li2 second isomer and BLi3, to be most stable among all 11 molecules of BxLiy (x = 1–3, y = 1–3). The stability of BxLiy (x = 1–3, y = 1–3) clusters depends on both the formation of geometrical structures and on the number of Li atoms. As the number of Li atoms in the groups increases, the stability of the BxLiy clusters also increases. Within each group, the formation of geometrical structures also changes the stability of the BxLiy clusters. It is observed that this may change the capability of chemical reactions in the BxLiy clusters. Consequently, we can understand that all molecules have changed the capability of the chemical reaction. For these reasons, it can be concluded that using BxLiy clusters could be an acceptable strategy to improve the ability of studied nanostructures as new materials of energy storage. Further experimental studies needed to evaluate the potential of BxLiy clusters as new materials of energy storage.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, supervision and methodology, M.A.Ç.; Software, investigation and writing—original draft preparation A.Ö. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Balema, V.P. Mechanical processing in Hydrogen storage research and development. Mater. Matters 2007, 2, 16–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Soloveichik, G.L. Metal borohydrides as hydrogen storage materials. Mater. Matters 2007, 2, 11–15. [Google Scholar]
  3. Demirbaş, A. Hydrogen and Boron as Recent Alternative Motor Fuels. Energy Sour. 2005, 27, 741–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Xiong, Z.T.; Yong, C.K.; Wu, G.T.; Chen, P.; Shaw, W.; Karkambar, A.; Aurtrey, T.; Jones, M.O.; Johnson, S.R.; Edwards, P.P.; et al. High-capacity hydrogen storage in lithium and sodium amidoboranes. Nat. Mater. 2008, 7, 138–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Mormillan, M.; Veziroğlu, T.; Mormillan, M.; Veziroğlu, T. Current status of hydrogen energy. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2002, 6, 141–179. [Google Scholar]
  6. Ewald, R. Requirements for advanced mobile storage systems. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 1998, 23, 803–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Karabacak, M.; Özçelik, S.; Güvenç, Z.B. Structures and energetics Of Pdn (n = 2–20) clusters using an embedded-atom model potential. Surf. Sci. 2003, 507, 636–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Böyükata, M.; Özdoğan, C.; Güvenç, Z.B. An investigation of hydrogen bonded neutral B4Hn (n = 1–11) and anionic B4H11(−1) clusters: Density functional study. J. Mol. Struct. THEOCHEM 2007, 805, 91–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sudik, A.; Yang, J.; Halliday, D.; Wolverton, C. Hydrogen Storage Properties in (LiNH2)2−LiBH4−(MgH2)X Mixtures (X = 0.0−1.0). J. Phys. Chem. C 2008, 112, 4384–4390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Böyükata, M.; Güvenç, Z.B. Density functional study of AlBn clusters for n = 1–14. J. Alloys Compd. 2011, 509, 4214–4234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bandaru, S.; Chakraborty, A.; Giri, S.; Chattaraj, P.K. Toward analyzing some neutral and cationic boron–lithium clusters (Bx Liy x = 2–6; y = 1, 2) as effective hydrogen storage materials: A conceptual density functional study. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 2012, 112, 695–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Li, Y.; Wu, D.; Li, Z.; Sun, C.C. Structural and electronic properties of boron-doped lithium clusters: Ab initio and DFT studies. J. Comput. Chem. 2007, 28, 1677–1684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Wang, F.E.; Mitchell, M.A.; Sutula, R.A.; Holden, J.R. Crystal structure study of a new compound Li5B4. J. Less-Common Met. 1978, 61, 237–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Sutton, L.E. (Ed.) Tables of Interatomic Distances and Configuration in Molecules and Ions. In Interatomic Distances Supplement; The Chemical Society: London, UK, 1958. [Google Scholar]
  15. Hagenmueller, P.; Naslain, R. L’hexaboruce NaB6. Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sci. 1963, 257, 1294–1296. [Google Scholar]
  16. Lipp, A. Process for the Preparation of Alkali Borides. Fr. Patent 1461878, 9 December 1966. [Google Scholar]
  17. Kiessling, R. The Borides of Some Transition Elements. Acta Chem. Stand. 1950, 4, 209–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Rupp, L.W.; Hodges, D.J. Conduction-electron spin resonance in alkali hexaborides. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 1974, 35, 617–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Schmidt, P.H. Personal Communication; Be11 Telephone Laboratories: Murray Hill, NJ, USA, 1976. [Google Scholar]
  20. Secrist, D.R.; Childs, W.J. Lithium-Boron-Carbide Reaction Studies; USAEC Rep. TID-17149, Knolls Atomic Power Lab.: Schenectady, NY, USA, 1962. [Google Scholar]
  21. Secrist, D.R. Compound Formation in the Systems Lithium‐Carbon and Lithium-Boron. J. Am. Ceram. Sot. 1967, 50, 520–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Meden, A.; Mavri, J.; Bele, M.; Pejovik, S. Dissolution of Boron in Lithium Melt. J. Phys. Chem. 1995, 99, 4252–4259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Nguyen, K.A.; Lammertsma, K. Structure, Bonding, and Stability of Small Boron−Lithium Clusters. J. Phys. Chem A 1998, 102, 1608–1614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Nguyen, K.A.; Srinivas, G.N.; Hamilton, T.P.; Lammerstsma, K. Stability of Hyperlithiated Borides. J. Phys. Chem A 1999, 103, 710–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Giannozzi, P.; Baroni, S.; Bonini, N.; Calandra, M.; Car, R.; Cavazzoni, C.; Ceresoli, D.; Chiarotti, G.L.; Cococcioni, M.; Dabo, I.; et al. QUANTUM ESPRESSO: A modular and open-source software project for quantum simulations of materials. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2009, 21, 395502–395521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Giannozzi, P.; Andreussi, O.; Brumme, T.; Bunau, O.; Buongiorno Nardelli, M.; Calandra, M.; Car, R.; Cavazzoni, C.; Ceresoli, D.; Cococcioni, M.; et al. Advanced capabilities for materials modelling with Quantum ESPRESSO. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2017, 29, 465901–465931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Zhurko, G.A. Chemcraft—Graphical Program for Visualization of Quantum Chemistry Computations. Available online: https://chemcraftprog.com (accessed on 18 January 2020).
  28. Burai. Available online: https://nisihara.wixsite.com/burai (accessed on 6 March 2020).
  29. Dion, M.; Rydberg, H.; Schröder, E.; Langreth, D.C.; Lundquist, B.I. Van der Waals Density Functional for General Geometrie. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004, 92, 246401–246405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Becke, A.D. Density-functional exchange-energy approximation with correct asymptotic behavior. Phys. Rev. A 1988, 38, 3098–3100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Lee, C.; Yang, W.; Parr, R.G. Development of the Colle-Salvetti correlation-energy formula into a functional of the electron density. Phys. Rev. B 1988, 37, 785–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Perdew, J.P.; Burke, K.; Ernzerhof, M. Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996, 77, 3865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Nagabalasubramanian, P.B.; Karabacak, M.; Periandy, S.; Govindarajan, M. Molecular structure, vibrational, electronic and thermal properties of 4-vinylcyclohexene by quantum chemical calculations. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectr. 2015, 145, 340–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Srinivas, G.N.; Hamilton, T.P.; Boatz, J.A.; Lammertsma, K. Theoretical Studies of B2Lin (n = 1−4). J. Phys. Chem. A 1999, 103, 9931–9937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds are not available from the authors.
Figure 1. The BxLiy (x = 1–3, y = 1–3) molecules.
Figure 1. The BxLiy (x = 1–3, y = 1–3) molecules.
Molecules 25 03266 g001
Figure 2. HOMO-LUMO Gap.
Figure 2. HOMO-LUMO Gap.
Molecules 25 03266 g002
Figure 3. Total Energy.
Figure 3. Total Energy.
Molecules 25 03266 g003
Figure 4. Force on Atom.
Figure 4. Force on Atom.
Molecules 25 03266 g004
Figure 5. Binding Energy per Atom.
Figure 5. Binding Energy per Atom.
Molecules 25 03266 g005
Figure 6. The Second Difference in Energy.
Figure 6. The Second Difference in Energy.
Molecules 25 03266 g006
Figure 7. Dissociation Energy.
Figure 7. Dissociation Energy.
Molecules 25 03266 g007
Figure 8. (ak). The BxLiy (x = 1–3, y = 1–3) clusters of the Density of States.
Figure 8. (ak). The BxLiy (x = 1–3, y = 1–3) clusters of the Density of States.
Molecules 25 03266 g008aMolecules 25 03266 g008bMolecules 25 03266 g008cMolecules 25 03266 g008dMolecules 25 03266 g008eMolecules 25 03266 g008f
Figure 9. (ak). The BxLiy (x = 1–3, y = 1–3) clusters of the Band Structure.
Figure 9. (ak). The BxLiy (x = 1–3, y = 1–3) clusters of the Band Structure.
Molecules 25 03266 g009aMolecules 25 03266 g009bMolecules 25 03266 g009cMolecules 25 03266 g009dMolecules 25 03266 g009eMolecules 25 03266 g009f
Table 1. Average Bond Lengths of the BxLiy clusters.
Table 1. Average Bond Lengths of the BxLiy clusters.
ParametersB–LiB–BLi–Li
Bond Lengths (Å)
BLi2.437--
BLi2 1. isomer2.207-4.414
BLi2 2. isomer2.324-2.921
BLi32.202-3.606
B2Li 1. isomer2.1131.617-
B2Li 2. isomer2.2631.568-
B2Li2 1. isomer2.1801.5283.258
B2Li2 2. isomer2.0871.5965.770
B2Li2 3. isomer2.4551.6394.629
B3Li 1. isomer2.3051.618-
B3Li 2. isomer2.2691.545-
Table 2. Properties of the BxLiy Clusters.
Table 2. Properties of the BxLiy Clusters.
Clusters/IsomerTotal Energy (eV)Force on Atom
(eV/Å)
Frequency Lowest/Highest
(cm−1)
Point GroupBinding Energy Per AtomHOMO-LUMO Gap
BLi−277.377050.0217515428.919/-CV0.8186404240.3392
BLi2 1. isomer−477.547320.001696976.22/601.68Dh1.1789754140.8877
BLi2 2. isomer−477.547680.0329979214.99/420.81C2V1.1789874460.8901
BLi3−677.850930.0350184123.46/608.29C11.3899841420.2944
B2Li 1. isomer−359.139390.0286678164.70/1193.25CS1.9784639310.0063
B2Li 2. isomer−359.818420.0086903305.08/1112.38CS2.2048070090.3025
B2Li2 1. isomer−561.363460.0230113108.68/1170.00C12.4709663690.7278
B2Li2 2. isomer−559.907840.023631476.05/1171.04Dh2.1070606420.0000
B2Li2 3. isomer−579.075180.0407777245.10/1148.02C2V6.8988973290.5800
B3Li 1. isomer−462.463800.032498771.43/1526.35CV7.9489005020.3191
B3Li 2. isomer−444.959860.0270737244.13/1245.33C13.5729158542.1249

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Çipiloğlu, M.A.; Özkurt, A. Theoretical Investigation on Molecular Structure and Electronic Properties of BxLiy Cluster for Lithium-Ion Batteries with Quantum ESPRESSO Program. Molecules 2020, 25, 3266. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25143266

AMA Style

Çipiloğlu MA, Özkurt A. Theoretical Investigation on Molecular Structure and Electronic Properties of BxLiy Cluster for Lithium-Ion Batteries with Quantum ESPRESSO Program. Molecules. 2020; 25(14):3266. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25143266

Chicago/Turabian Style

Çipiloğlu, Mustafa Ali, and Ali Özkurt. 2020. "Theoretical Investigation on Molecular Structure and Electronic Properties of BxLiy Cluster for Lithium-Ion Batteries with Quantum ESPRESSO Program" Molecules 25, no. 14: 3266. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25143266

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop