Next Article in Journal
Antidiabetic Activity and Potential Mechanism of Amentoflavone in Diabetic Mice
Previous Article in Journal
Lycopodium Attenuates Loss of Dopaminergic Neurons by Suppressing Oxidative Stress and Neuroinflammation in a Rat Model of Parkinson’s Disease
Open AccessArticle

Systematic Studies on the Protocol and Criteria for Selecting a Covalent Docking Tool

1
Research Center for Drug Discovery, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Sun Yat-Sen University, 132 East Circle at University City, Guangzhou 510006, China
2
National Supercomputer Center in Guangzhou & School of Data and Computer Science, Sun Yat-Sen University, 132 East Circle at University City, Guangzhou 510006, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2019, 24(11), 2183; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24112183
Received: 13 May 2019 / Revised: 6 June 2019 / Accepted: 7 June 2019 / Published: 10 June 2019
(This article belongs to the Section Computational and Theoretical Chemistry)
With the resurgence of drugs with covalent binding mechanisms, much attention has been paid to docking methods for the discovery of targeted covalent inhibitors. The existence of many available covalent docking tools has inspired development of a systematic and objective procedure and criteria with which to evaluate these programs. In order to find a tool appropriate to studies of a covalently binding system, protocols and criteria are proposed for protein–ligand covalent docking studies. This paper consists of three sections: (1) curating a standard data set to evaluate covalent docking tools objectively; (2) establishing criteria to measure the performance of a tool applied for docking ligands into a complex system; and (3) creating a protocol to evaluate and select covalent binding tools. The protocols were applied to evaluate four covalent docking tools (MOE, GOLD, CovDock, and ICM-Pro) and parameters affecting covalent docking performance were investigated. View Full-Text
Keywords: drug design; chemoinformatics; molecular modeling; covalent docking; protein binding drug design; chemoinformatics; molecular modeling; covalent docking; protein binding
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Wen, C.; Yan, X.; Gu, Q.; Du, J.; Wu, D.; Lu, Y.; Zhou, H.; Xu, J. Systematic Studies on the Protocol and Criteria for Selecting a Covalent Docking Tool. Molecules 2019, 24, 2183.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop