Next Article in Journal
Phenolics and Polyphenolics from Melastomataceae Species
Next Article in Special Issue
Water-Soluble Lignins from Different Bioenergy Crops Stimulate the Early Development of Maize (Zea mays, L.)
Previous Article in Journal
Is Promiscuous CALB a Good Scaffold for Designing New Epoxidases?
Previous Article in Special Issue
Enzymatic Transesterification of Kraft Lignin with Long Acyl Chains in Ionic Liquids
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Glucuronoyl Esterase Screening and Characterization Assays Utilizing Commercially Available Benzyl Glucuronic Acid Ester

1
Industrial Biotechnology, Department of Biology and Biological Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg SE-412 96, Sweden
2
Wallenberg Wood Science Centre, Teknikringen 56-58, Stockholm SE-100 44, Sweden
3
Biotechnology Laboratory, School of Chemical Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 5 Iroon Polytechniou Str., Zografou Campus, Athens 15780, Greece
4
Biochemical Process Engineering, Division of Chemical Engineering, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå SE-971 87, Sweden
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2015, 20(10), 17807-17817; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules201017807
Submission received: 15 July 2015 / Revised: 10 September 2015 / Accepted: 17 September 2015 / Published: 25 September 2015
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biocatalytic Lignin Modification)

Abstract

:
Research on glucuronoyl esterases (GEs) has been hampered by the lack of enzyme assays based on easily obtainable substrates. While benzyl d-glucuronic acid ester (BnGlcA) is a commercially available substrate that can be used for GE assays, several considerations regarding substrate instability, limited solubility and low apparent affinities should be made. In this work we discuss the factors that are important when using BnGlcA for assaying GE activity and show how these can be applied when designing BnGlcA-based GE assays for different applications: a thin-layer chromatography assay for qualitative activity detection, a coupled-enzyme spectrophotometric assay that can be used for high-throughput screening or general activity determinations and a HPLC-based detection method allowing kinetic determinations. The three-level experimental procedure not merely facilitates routine, fast and simple biochemical characterizations but it can also give rise to the discovery of different GEs through an extensive screening of heterologous Genomic and Metagenomic expression libraries.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Glucuronoyl esterases (GEs) are a recently discovered group of enzymes, which have been attributed the functional role of hydrolyzing the ester bonds between lignin alcohols and the 4-O-methyl-d-glucuronic acid side chains of xylan in plant cell walls [1,2]. These ester bonds constitute one of several bond types postulated to link lignin to carbohydrates (LC-bonds) in lignified plant matter [3]. As potential hydrolysers of this type of ester bonds, GEs may prove valuable as research tools for the investigation of lignin and LC-bond chemistry, as well as in a broad range of industrial applications for the biocatalytic processes of lignocellulose degradation and modification of lignocellulosic materials.
The first GE, ScGE1 from Schizophyllum commune, was discovered and characterized in 2006 [1]. Its gene sequence was determined in 2007, leading to the discovery of the Hypocrea jecorina GE Cip2 [4] whose structure was determined in 2011 [5]. The ScGE1 sequence initiated the establishment of carbohydrate esterase (CE) family 15 in the CAZy classification [6]. In addition, two GE enzymes from Phanerochaete chrysosporium (PcGE1 and PcGE2) [7], two from Myceliophthora thermophila (StGE1 [8] and StGE2 [9]), one from Podospora anserina (PaGE1) [10] and one from Cerrena unicolor (CuGE) [11] have been characterized. Structural determination of a catalytically inactive StGE2 mutant in complex with methyl 4-O-methyl-β-d-glucopyranuronate [12] provided novel insight into the structural determinants involved in substrate recognition and catalytic mechanism of GEs. To date, despite the new findings on CE15 family members, their physiological role and function remain to be fully delineated.
The discovery and characterization of GEs rests upon substrates that are products of laborious organic synthesis procedures, e.g., [13,14,15], thus limiting their accessibility and impeding the development and utilization of this promising class of enzymes. To broaden the scope of GE research, as well as to enhance its applicability in the sector of Industrial Biotechnology, standardized assays based on readily available substrates are required. Different types of assays have different requirements. For screening, simple and sensitive assays that are positive for a wide range of substrate specificities are ideal. To assess screening results, specificity is preferred over generality, whereas for enzyme purification purposes simplicity is preferable. Furthermore, for characterization, high precision and a large dynamic range are key features. Much of the value of characterization assays lies in activity comparisons between different enzymes using the same substrate. A kinetic GE assay on a substrate easily attainable for research purposes would therefore be the ideal.
The aim of this work is to present well-designed assay methods for the determination and screening of novel GE activity, using the commercially available benzyl d-glucuronic acid ester (BnGlcA) as a substrate. This substrate resembles the postulated β-O-4 α-carbon ester bond of d-glucuronic acid and constitutes a subset of the diaryl benzyl LC-ester model 1-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)-1-(α-d-glucuronate)-2-(2-methoxyphenoxy)-3-propanol that was recently synthesized and demonstrated to be hydrolysable by StGE2 [16]. We describe the application of this substrate in (a) a Thin Layer Chromatography (TLC) assay for qualitative activity assessment (b) a spectrophotometer-based assay useful for screening, and (c) an HPLC-based assay allowing more precise activity determinations, enabling enzyme kinetics characterization. In addition, TLC and spectrophotometric methods are less costly and time consuming, and there is no need for complicated instruments for the analysis.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Thin Layer Chromatography Assay

As a method for qualitative detection of GE activity, the TLC assay is a straightforward application of the N-(1-naphthyl)ethylenediamine dihydrochloride-based method [1,17], with the option to use an H2SO4-anisaldehyde reagent for development.
The TLC assay methodology was validated on purified PaGE1 and concentrated StGE2 culture filtrate. Figure 1 presents the TLC chromatograms and demonstrates the plate appearances for both suggested developing reagents. The substrate spot in the PaGE1 sample lanes have completely disappeared while the reduced intensity of corresponding spot in the crude StGE2 culture filtrate shows an incomplete enzymatic reaction. The analysis had a runtime of 30 min (4.7 cm rise) and for both reagents complete color development required 10 min at 100 °C. Color fading and storage corresponded to what has been previously reported [17]. GlcA and BnGlcA had Rfs of 0.1 and 0.85, respectively. The TLC image shows a secondary spot of varying intensity in the BnGlcA substrate at Rf 0.7. This could be due to ring-closing isomers or dimers of the substrate and is consistent with the appearance of BnGlcA as a double peak in HPLC. The prominence of this spot in the culture filtrate samples indicates that the composition affects the equilibrium.
Figure 1. TLC chromatograms of two different plates. GlcA and BnGlcA were used as standards. As samples, BnGlcA that had been incubated with either of StGE2, boiled StGE2 (StGE2 bl.), PaGE1 or boiled PaGE1 (PaGE1 bl.) was used. Plate (a) was developed using the N-(1-naphthyl)ethylenediamine dihydrochloride reagent and Plate (b) using the H2SO4-anisaldehyde reagent.
Figure 1. TLC chromatograms of two different plates. GlcA and BnGlcA were used as standards. As samples, BnGlcA that had been incubated with either of StGE2, boiled StGE2 (StGE2 bl.), PaGE1 or boiled PaGE1 (PaGE1 bl.) was used. Plate (a) was developed using the N-(1-naphthyl)ethylenediamine dihydrochloride reagent and Plate (b) using the H2SO4-anisaldehyde reagent.
Molecules 20 17807 g001

2.2. Spectrophotometric Assay

As a method for screening and activity estimation, the spectrophotometric assay uses NAD+-dependent oxidation of GlcA by uronate dehydrogenase (UDH) [18] as implemented in the uronic acid detection kit (K-URONIC Megazymes, Ireland) for quantification of the GlcA released by GE activity in a discontinuous coupled-assay protocol.
The methodology of the spectrophotometric assay was verified, and the detection limit determined, using concentrated StGE2 culture filtrate, chosen in order to resemble the conditions of a screening assay. Table 1 presents the detected activities for the culture filtrate in two separate dilution series, of four or ten times initial dilution. The lowest detected activity was 0.74 mU for the 9 µL sample (Table 1), corresponding to 0.9 µg StGE2. From these results, it can be concluded that the detection limit is at least 1 mU for a 1-tailed significance of p ~ 0.001. This corresponds to a detection limit of at least 4 mU/mL for an undiluted sample. Accepting a lower significance level, such as the customary p < 0.05, would give a better detection limit.
Table 1. Results from the spectrophotometric assay for an StGE2 culture filtrate for two separate dilution series. Sample volume in the first column refers to the volume of undiluted culture filtrate. Activity is calculated (i) separately for each dilution and (ii) for each series as a regression on all dilutions. For each sample, the determined activity (Det.Act.) and the volumetric activity (Vol.Act.; based on the undiluted sample) are presented. The coefficient of determination (r2) and the 1-tailed significance for each slope (p) are given. The analysis is also outlined in Figure 3.
Table 1. Results from the spectrophotometric assay for an StGE2 culture filtrate for two separate dilution series. Sample volume in the first column refers to the volume of undiluted culture filtrate. Activity is calculated (i) separately for each dilution and (ii) for each series as a regression on all dilutions. For each sample, the determined activity (Det.Act.) and the volumetric activity (Vol.Act.; based on the undiluted sample) are presented. The coefficient of determination (r2) and the 1-tailed significance for each slope (p) are given. The analysis is also outlined in Figure 3.
Undil. Sample Vol. (µL)Det.Act (mU)Vol.Act. (mU/mL)Slope (Au/mL/min)r2p 1-Tail
StGE2 culture filtrate with an initial dilution of ten times in H2O
90.7482.115.40.9060.00095
13.51.1484.215.80.9771 × 10−5
181.6088.716.60.9882 × 10−6
regression on all dilutions88.016.50.9642 × 10−9
StGE2 culture filtrate with an initial dilution of four times in H2O
22.51.6472.913.70.9873 × 10−6
453.5378.414.70.9972 × 10−8
67.55.1275.814.20.9991 × 10−6
regression on all dilutions76.614.30.9971 × 10−16

2.3. HPLC Assay and Kinetic Parameter Estimation

As a precision method for GE activity determination and kinetic parameter estimation, the HPLC method uses a stopped-reaction protocol followed by reverse-phase HPLC separation and quantification of the released benzyl alcohol by its UV absorbance at 254 nm.
The HPLC assay was validated by using it for the estimation of the kinetic parameters of purified PaGE1 and StGE2. Table 2 presents the determined kinetic parameters and Figure 2 shows the measured specific activities and the fitted Michaelis-Menten functions with their 95% confidence intervals. When fitting the experimental data, both fits gave a correlation coefficient for Km and Vmax of 0.97. Because of this parameter dependence, which is to be expected when the maximum substrate concentration is not sufficiently high compared to Km, the 95% confidence intervals, shown as a contour plot in the inset graph of Figure 2, could not be computed from the standard errors and were instead constructed by a non-parametric method. To assess the limitations for the assay conditions, the half-life of BnGlcA was estimated at 30 °C and 40 °C and found to be 1.1 and 2.6 h at 40 °C and 3 and 6 h at 30 °C for pH 6.2 and 5.8, respectively.
Table 2. The kinetic parameters of PaGE1 and StGE2 on BnGlcA as determined in the HPLC assay. The standard errors were calculated from the covariance matrix of the parameter fitting and the 95% confidence intervals were estimated as described in the Experimental Section.
Table 2. The kinetic parameters of PaGE1 and StGE2 on BnGlcA as determined in the HPLC assay. The standard errors were calculated from the covariance matrix of the parameter fitting and the 95% confidence intervals were estimated as described in the Experimental Section.
Km (mM)Vmax (U/mg)Kcat (s−1)
Km (s.e.)95% c.i.Vmax (s.e.)95% c.i.Kcat (s.e.)95% c.i.
PaGE112.1 (0.8)9.4–15.87.5 (0.2)6.6–8.67.8 (0.3)6.9–9.0
StGE28.9 (0.5)7.3–11.14.9 (0.1)4.4–5.43.5 (0.1)3.2–3.9
Figure 2. A least-squares regression fit of the Michaelis-Menten equation to the assay rate data for PaGE1 and StGE2. The dashed lines in the main graph and the inset contour plot present two different views of the 95% confidence intervals of the parameter estimates.
Figure 2. A least-squares regression fit of the Michaelis-Menten equation to the assay rate data for PaGE1 and StGE2. The dashed lines in the main graph and the inset contour plot present two different views of the 95% confidence intervals of the parameter estimates.
Molecules 20 17807 g002

2.4. Comparison of the Three BnGlcA Assay Procedures

BnGlcA is easily used for a TLC-based assay for straightforward assaying without equipment requirements (Figure 1). This method constitutes a fast qualitative screening of sample activity, ideal for protein purification and useful for simple screening assays.
The results from the spectrophotometric assay indicate that BnGlcA can be used as substrate in assays to detect enzyme activities with a detection limit of <4 mU/mL, corresponding to 0.9 µg for StGE2. The applicability of the screening assay depends on how the aforementioned detection limit compares to the activity of actual titers attained in screening experiments. Literature titers for native expressions are 10 U/mL for S. commune [1] on methyl ester of 4-O-methyl GlcA, 19–120 mU/mL for P. chrysosporium [2] and 77 mU/mL for M. thermophila [8] both on 4-nitrophenyl 2-O-(methyl 4-O-methyl-α-d-glucopyranosyluronate)-β-d-xylopyranoside. No reliable data is available to directly estimate the corresponding activities on BnGlcA for these enzymes. However, for PaGE1 the activity on 2 mM BnGlcA determined in this study (1 U/mg) is somewhat higher than the activity exhibited on 2 mM 4-nitrophenyl 2-O-(methyl 4-O-methyl-α-d-glucopyranosyluronate)-β-d-xylopyranoside (0.6 U/mg [10]), showing that for this enzyme, a direct comparison is possible. Furthermore, the calculated detection limit for PaGE1 and StGE2 with the spectrophotometric assay is less than 1 µg/mL, which would be sufficient for detecting and quantifying the GE titers that have been previously reported for native GE expression (10 µg/mL [1] and 5 µg/mL [8]). The determining factor for the applicability of BnGlcA in screening assays is consequently the specific activity that each target enzyme exhibits for this substrate.
The spectrophotometric assay is, in the microplate format, also applicable for activity determination in expression libraries or during a downstream process, such as protein purification. As the suggested protocol is designed to fulfill several requirements at once—statistical significance, low detection limit and quantification over two orders of magnitude—it can be simplified to match the assay requirements. However, appropriate reference samples should be used and the limited linear range of the assay should be considered. For simple activity detection TLC analysis using BnGlcA may also be a suitable option.
The measured half-times around pH 6 illustrate the pH and temperature dependence of the BnGlcA background hydrolysis and show that the assay is practically limited to pH 4–6 and to temperatures below 50 °C. Even at moderate pH and temperature, background hydrolysis may cause activity underestimation if not taken into account, and at high pH and temperature assay accuracy cannot be maintained. Hence, BnGlcA is not reliable at neutral to basic pH or at high temperatures. However, as GEs constitute a class of enzymes where substrate specificities have not yet been thoroughly explored, the usable range of conditions would be applicable for most assay situations.
The HPLC-based assay has a broader applicability than the spectrophotometric assay. The ability to stop the enzymatic and background reactions allows the assay to be applied over a wider range of pH and temperature. The spectrophotometric assay is not suitable for kinetics, as the reaction system in that assay is too complex to accurately estimate initial enzymatic hydrolysis rates. In contrast, the HPLC assay uses a simpler reaction system where the enzymatic and background reactions are stopped after a certain incubation time. This, in conjunction with the use of one boiled-enzyme control for each sample, gives the HPLC assay the precision and accuracy required for kinetic characterization.
The apparent factors that decide the applicability of BnGlcA for the determination of kinetic parameters are the solubility of the substrate, the affinities of the target enzymes and the pH and temperature limits of the assay. The hydrophobic BnGlcA has a limited solubility without co-solvents or emulsifiers, and their usage may have appreciable effects on reaction kinetics. Determining a Km parameter requires a substrate concentration of at least double the Km value. Thus, uncertainty increases with an increasing Km and the high Kms observed for several enzymes on BnGlcA (see Table 2 and [11]) should therefore be interpreted with caution. In addition, to the authors’ knowledge, there is no report on the significance of Km values determined with soluble substrates as estimators of the affinity or reaction rate on insoluble ones. Regardless of their validity, the kinetic parameters estimates can be used practically for activity prediction inside of the assayed substrate range, although predictions based on the measured activities rather than derived kinetic parameters may give more accurate results.
The third factor, which is the limited range of usable assay conditions, is not necessarily a drawback for activity comparison. The ability to assay all available GEs and determine the kinetic properties at a single pH and temperature, even if not the optimal for the individual enzyme, would nonetheless provide a common denominator and to this end a pH of 6 at temperatures of 30–40 °C is a good starting point.
Our work outlines strategies and suggests methods that can be used to overcome the pitfalls that could otherwise be encountered when designing, applying, reporting on and interpreting BnGlcA-based assays, such as those related to the instability and limited solubility of BnGlcA. BnGlcA is indeed a suitable candidate substrate to be routinely employed for general activity determinations, as well as for biochemical characterization of GEs.

3. Experimental Section

3.1. Chemicals and Enzymes

BnGlcA was purchased from Carbosynth (Compton, UK). StGE2 and PaGE1 were produced and purified as described previously [9,10], while StGE2 was used before purification as a concentrated StGE2 culture filtrate in the TLC and spectrophotometric assays. The P. anserina strain used for the expression of PaGE1 in the present work was kindly provided by Jean-Guy Berrin (INRA, Aix Marseille Université, Marseille, France). Deionized H2O was used for all experimentation. All other chemicals were of HPLC grade and purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA).

3.2. Thin-Layer Chromatography Assay

10 µL of 5 mM BnGlcA in 50 mM pH 6 acetate buffer was incubated for 30 min by purified PaGE1 (50 µg; 35 °C) or StGE2 culture filtrate (1 µg; 45 °C). 0.5 µL samples were blotted onto Merck silica gel 60 F254-precoated plates and analysed, as previously described [1]. H2SO4-anisaldehyde reagent (170 mL methanol, 20 mL glacial acetic acid, 10 mL H2SO4 and 1 mL 4-anisaldehyde) or N-(1-naphthyl)ethylenediamine dihydrochloride reagent [17] were used as developing reagents.

3.3. Spectrophotometric Assay

The spectrophotometric assay uses the K-URONIC kit (Megazyme, Bray, Ireland) and is based on the oxidation of d-glucuronic acid to d-glucarate by uronate dehydrogenase which is monitored by measuring the absorbance of NADH at 340 nm [18], a wavelength where benzyl alcohol and BnGlcA have negligible absorbance. Measurements were performed with 250 µL well volume in a 96-well flat-bottomed microplate (Sarstedt 82.1581, Nümbrecht, Germany) in absorbance mode (FLUOstar Omega, BMG Labtech, Ortenberg, Germany). BnGlcA was dissolved in 100% dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO) to a 100 mM substrate stock and stored at −20 °C. To determine effective molar absorptivity and plate reader linear range, a standard curve of GlcA covering the entire detection range was generated. For each subsequent analysis, at least one upper-range standard was included as an external standard.
The StGE2 culture filtrate was diluted in H2O and a portion of the dilution was heat-inactivated whereafter active and boiled culture filtrate were recombined at varying proportions to create a dilution series with the same protein concentration and background composition but with varying activity. Each dilution was assayed in duplicate in 2 mM BnGlcA at 45 °C for 30 min. The samples were transferred to a microplate in technical duplicates and supplemented with 50 µL of cold detection solution (Figure 3a), consisting of 40% buffer, 40% NAD+ and 4% UDH, as included in the K-URONIC kit. The detection reaction was followed by the NADH formation by taking the absorbance every 30–60 s for 60 min. The GlcA released during the enzyme reaction is quickly hydrolysed and a semi steady-state condition is eventually reached (Figure 3b), when the GlcA concentration is slowly decreasing, following the decreasing concentration of BnGlcA, which is continuously hydrolysed during the detection reaction.
Figure 3. Summary of the spectrophotometric assay. After the enzymatic reaction the samples are; (a) loaded together with controls and standards into a 96-well microplate and supplemented with detection reagents; In the detection reaction (b) GlcA released during the enzymatic reaction is oxidized while BnGlcA is continuously hydrolyzing to release additional GlcA. A (semi) steady-state is eventually reached at time t; (c) The detection reaction is assumed to be at steady-state when the included standard(s) have reached 95% conversion (time t*); (d) The slope of sample amount vs. absorbance at t* is calculated.
Figure 3. Summary of the spectrophotometric assay. After the enzymatic reaction the samples are; (a) loaded together with controls and standards into a 96-well microplate and supplemented with detection reagents; In the detection reaction (b) GlcA released during the enzymatic reaction is oxidized while BnGlcA is continuously hydrolyzing to release additional GlcA. A (semi) steady-state is eventually reached at time t; (c) The detection reaction is assumed to be at steady-state when the included standard(s) have reached 95% conversion (time t*); (d) The slope of sample amount vs. absorbance at t* is calculated.
Molecules 20 17807 g003
The steady-state condition was estimated by analysis of the included standards: samples were assumed to be in a steady-state from the first time point when all the included standards had reached 95% of their plateau values (Figure 3c). A linear regression was made for the absorbance values at this time point as a function of the amount of active enzyme in each sample of the dilution series (Figure 3d). A significance value for the sample being positive could then be obtained from the t-statistic of the slope of this line. In order to estimate the sample activity, the slope and its standard error were converted to specific activities by the specific absorbance of the NADH as estimated by the standard curve.

3.4. HPLC-Based Assay

BnGlcA was dissolved in 100% DMSO to stock solutions of 100 mM and 250 mM, which were aliquoted and stored at −20 °C. Before each experiment, the substrate was diluted in a 100 mM pH 6 phosphate buffer into 15 concentrations 0.25–20 mM (PaGE1) or 16 concentrations 0.25–18 mM (StGE2). For each sample, 470 µL of the substrate solution were supplemented by 30 µL PaGE1 (7.1 µg) or StGE2 (18 µg) in 20 mM pH 8 Tris-HCl buffer and incubated at 35 °C and 45 °C respectively. For each sample, a corresponding boiled-enzyme control was made. After 30 min, 100 μL of glacial acetic acid were added to stop the reaction and each sample was analysed by HPLC in duplicate at 20 °C overnight. Separation of BnGlcA and benzyl alcohol was achieved in a C18 Nucleosil column (250 mm × 4.6 mm) (Macherey Nagel, Düren, Germany) using acetonitrile/water (6:4 v/v) with a flow rate of 0.4 mL·min−1 (Jasco PU 987, Tokyo, Japan) at room temperature. The benzyl group was detected by UV absorption at 254 nm (UV-Vis ProStar 335 Diode Array Detector, Agilent Technologies). For estimation of the BnGlcA background hydrolysis, the hydrolysis rates of 1 mM BnGlcA in 50 mM acetate-phosphate buffers at pH 5.8 and 6.2 (as measured at 40 and 30 °C) were monitored by HPLC at minimally 6 time points per sample over at least 30 min.
Km and Vmax were estimated by a non-linear least squares optimization of the Michaelis-Menten equation. This was done using the lmfit (lmfit.github.io/lmfit-py) python (python.org) package. lmfit also provided non-parametric estimates of the two-dimensional confidence intervals by F-testing the χ2s of the optimal fit to each alternative Km and Vmax combination close to the best fit. The confidence intervals were then extracted from the resulting probability matrix, which was also used to generate a contour plot of each fit (combined for both enzymes in Figure 2).

4. Conclusions

The lack of available substrates for GE assays has been hampering GE research and a new reference substrate is required. The substrate should be universally available, cheap and easily applicable. BnGlcA is a low-cost, commercially available substrate and our work shows that it can be used for assaying GE activity in multiple contexts. It can be exploited non-quantitatively in a TLC-based assay that is fast to apply, scales easily and does not require any special equipment. With the use of a spectrophotometer, a quantitative coupled-enzyme assay can be set up. The presented protocol allows quantification of GE activity as well as screening, with a detection limit below 1 mU or 12 µg, as estimated for the two GEs studied. An HPLC-based GE assay on BnGlcA, using a standard C18 column for separation and UV absorbance to monitor the release of benzyl alcohol, allows determination of activity with higher precision and accuracy in a larger dynamic range augmenting the methodology’s potential for enzyme characterization. In addition, the spectrophotometric GE assay presented in this paper, is suitable for the high-throughput analysis of screening expression libraries that will enable the discovery of novel GEs. BnGlcA, a low cost and commercially available substrate, can be used in laboratory practice for a simple and fast assay approach using three different analytical methodologies supporting the discovery of novel GEs from saprophytic microorganisms.

Supplementary Materials

suppl_microplate _protocol.pdf: Detailed protocol for the microplate assay;
suppl_data_analysis.xlsx: Template for statistical hypothesis testing of microplate assay results;
Supplementary materials can be accessed at: https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/20/10/17807/s1.

Acknowledgments

HS and LO gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the Knut and Alice Wallenberg foundation through the Wallenberg Wood Science Center (WWSC). Silvia Hüttner and Sylvia Klaubauf at Chalmers University of Technology were instrumental for the development of the spectrophotometric assay. Maurizio Bettiga is thanked for fruitful discussions and scientific input. This research was co-financed by the European Union (European Social Fund—ESF) and Greek national funds through the Operational Program “Education and Lifelong Learning” of the National Strategic Reference Framework (NSRF)—Research Funding Program Heracleitus II, Investing in Knowledge Society through the European Social Fund.

Author Contributions

E.T. and P.C. conceived the approach, H.S. and M-D.C. designed and performed the experiments, H.S. analysed the data, E.T., L.O. and P.C. participated in the discussion of the results, E.T. and H.S. wrote the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Špániková, S.; Biely, P. Glucuronoyl esterase—Novel carbohydrate esterase produced by Schizophyllum commune. FEBS Lett. 2006, 580, 4597–4601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Duranová, M.; Hirsch, J.; Kolenová, K.; Biely, P. Fungal Glucuronoyl Esterases and Substrate Uronic Acid Recognition. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2009, 73, 2483–2487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Jeffries, T.W. Biodegradation of lignin-carbohydrate complexes. Biodegradation 1990, 1, 163–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Li, X.-L.; Špániková, S.; de Vries, R.P.; Biely, P. Identification of genes encoding microbial glucuronoyl esterases. FEBS Lett. 2007, 581, 4029–4035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Pokkuluri, P.R.; Duke, N.E.C.; Wood, S.J.; Cotta, M.A.; Li, X.-L.; Biely, P.; Schiffer, M. Structure of the catalytic domain of glucuronoyl esterase Cip2 from Hypocrea jecorina. Proteins 2011, 79, 2588–2592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Lombard, V.; Golaconda Ramulu, H.; Drula, E.; Coutinho, P.M.; Henrissat, B. The carbohydrate-active enzymes database (CAZy) in 2013. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 42, D490–D495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Duranová, M.; Špániková, S.; Wösten, H.A.B.; Biely, P.; de Vries, R.P. Two glucuronoyl esterases of Phanerochaete chrysosporium. Arch. Microbiol. 2009, 191, 133–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Vafiadi, C.; Topakas, E.; Biely, P.; Christakopoulos, P. Purification, characterization and mass spectrometric sequencing of a thermophilic glucuronoyl esterase from Sporotrichum thermophile. Fems Microbiol. Lett. 2009, 296, 178–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Topakas, E.; Moukouli, M.; Dimarogona, M.; Vafiadi, C.; Christakopoulos, P. Functional expression of a thermophilic glucuronyl esterase from Sporotrichum thermophile: Identification of the nucleophilic serine. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 87, 1765–1772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Katsimpouras, C.; Bénarouche, A.; Navarro, D.; Karpusas, M.; Dimarogona, M.; Berrin, J.-G.; Christakopoulos, P.; Topakas, E. Enzymatic synthesis of model substrates recognized by glucuronoyl esterases from Podospora anserina and Myceliophthora thermophila. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014, 98, 5507–5516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. d’Errico, C.; Jørgensen, J.O.; Krogh, K.B.R.M.; Spodsberg, N.; Madsen, R.; Monrad, R.N. Enzymatic degradation of lignin-carbohydrate complexes (LCCs): Model studies using a fungal glucuronoyl esterase from Cerrena unicolor. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2015, 112, 914–922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Charavgi, M.D.; Dimarogona, M.; Topakas, E.; Christakopoulos, P.; Chrysina, E.D. The structure of a novel glucuronoyl esterase from Myceliophthora thermophila gives new insights into its role as a potential biocatalyst. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2013, 69 Pt 1, 63–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Hirsch, J.; Langer, V.; Koós, M. Synthesis and molecular structure of methyl 4-O-methyl-α-d-glucopyranuronate. Molecules 2005, 10, 251–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Hirsch, J.; Koos, M.; Kovac, P. Improved synthesis of an aldobiouronic acid related to hardwood xylans, and preparation of a derivative thereof suitable for linking to proteins. Carbohydr Res. 1998, 310, 145–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Polakova, M.; Joniak, D.; Duris, M. Synthesis and acid-catalyzed hydrolysis of some 3-(4-methoxyphenyl)propyl glucuronates. Collect Czech Chem. C 2000, 65, 1609–1618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Nylander, F.; Sunner, H.; Olsson, L.; Christakopoulos, P.; Westman, G. Synthesis and enzymatic hydrolysis of a diaryl benzyl ester model of a lignin-carbohydrate complex (LCC). Holzforschung 2015, in press. [Google Scholar]
  17. Bounias, M. N-(1-naphthyl)ethylenediamine dihydrochloride as a new reagent for nanomole quantification of sugars on thin-layer plates by a mathematical calibration process. Anal. Biochem. 1980, 106, 291–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Moon, T.S.; Yoon, S.-H.; Tsang Mui Ching, M.-J.; Lanza, A.M.; Prather, K.L.J. Enzymatic assay of d-glucuronate using uronate dehydrogenase. Anal. Biochem. 2009, 392, 183–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds are not available from the authors.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sunner, H.; Charavgi, M.-D.; Olsson, L.; Topakas, E.; Christakopoulos, P. Glucuronoyl Esterase Screening and Characterization Assays Utilizing Commercially Available Benzyl Glucuronic Acid Ester. Molecules 2015, 20, 17807-17817. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules201017807

AMA Style

Sunner H, Charavgi M-D, Olsson L, Topakas E, Christakopoulos P. Glucuronoyl Esterase Screening and Characterization Assays Utilizing Commercially Available Benzyl Glucuronic Acid Ester. Molecules. 2015; 20(10):17807-17817. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules201017807

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sunner, Hampus, Maria-Despoina Charavgi, Lisbeth Olsson, Evangelos Topakas, and Paul Christakopoulos. 2015. "Glucuronoyl Esterase Screening and Characterization Assays Utilizing Commercially Available Benzyl Glucuronic Acid Ester" Molecules 20, no. 10: 17807-17817. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules201017807

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop