Next Article in Journal
Communic Acids: Occurrence, Properties and Use as Chirons for the Synthesis of Bioactive Compounds
Previous Article in Journal
Total Synthesis and Antidepressant Activities of Laetispicine and Its Derivatives
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Sesquiterpenes β-Caryophyllene and Caryophyllene Oxide Isolated from Senecio salignus Act as Phytogrowth and Photosynthesis Inhibitors

by
B. Arturo Sánchez-Muñoz
1,
Maria Isabel Aguilar
2,
Beatriz King-Díaz
1,
José Fausto Rivero
2 and
Blas Lotina-Hennsen
1,*
1
Departamento de Bioquímica, Facultad de Química, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria, Delegación Coyoacan, México D. F. 04510, Mexico
2
Departamento de Farmacia, Facultad de Química, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria, Delegación Coyoacan, México D. F. 04510, Mexico
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2012, 17(2), 1437-1447; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules17021437
Submission received: 9 December 2011 / Revised: 26 January 2012 / Accepted: 1 February 2012 / Published: 6 February 2012
(This article belongs to the Section Natural Products Chemistry)

Abstract

:
The n-hexane extract of S. salignus plants inhibited ATP synthesis and two sesquiterpenes, the β-caryophyllene (1) and caryophyllene oxide (2) were isolated from this nonpolar fraction. Compound 1 inhibited by 42% the root elongation of Physalis ixocarpa seedlings at 50 µg/mL and by 53% at 150 µg/mL, whereas at 150 µg/mL this compound only inhibited root elongation of Echinochloa crus-galli by 30%. On the other hand, compound 2 had no effect on either germination or root and stem growth of E. cruss galli and P. ixocarpa. However, 1 and 2 inhibited the dry biomass of P. ixocarpa plants grown for 18 days previous to treatment and it was found that 1 was the most active biomass inhibitor. The Chl a fluorescence transient in vivo experiment indicates that 1 (100 µg/mL) has a major effect at 72 h after treatment on leaves of P. ixocarpa plants by inhibiting photosystem II (PS II) transforming active reaction centers to “heat sinks” or the formation of silent reaction centers unable to reduce QA. β-Caryophyllene also induces chlorosis on treated leaves.

1. Introduction

The genus Senecio includes approximately 1,500 species widely distributed in Mexico and Central America [1]. Among the many species, the synonymous genus Barkleyanthus only has a single species: B. salicifolius or Senecio salignus (H.B.K.) Rob. and Brett. Quercetin was isolated from S. salignus (B. salicifolius) [2]. Furoeremophilane epoxides were also isolated from the aerial parts of S. salignus and 7-ketofuranoeremophilane from the roots in 1976 [3]. Later, the same authors found the pyrrolizidine alkaloid 7-angelylheliotridine [4]. S. salignus leaves are used against intermittent fever and rheumatism [5]. Our search for secondary metabolites in plants that affect photosynthesis, identified two sesquiterpenes: β-caryophyllene (1) and caryophyllene oxide (2) in S. salignus. It is well known that β-caryophyllene has anti-inflammatory, insecticidal and fungicidal [6] activities. In this work, compound 1 inhibited the germination and growth of Physalis ixocarpa, as well as the growth (root and stem elongation) of Echinocloa crus-galli. In vitro assays showed that sesquiterpene 1 also inhibited photosynthetic activities; however, compound 2 only inhibited Physalis ixocarpa plant growth, root and stem elongation. Light reactions of photosynthesis were performed by fluorescence induction curves of chlorophyll a of photosystem II (PS II), as shown by a JIP test.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Sesquiterpene Isolation and ATP Synthesis Determination

In the screening bioassay (ATP synthesis) it was found that the n-hexane extract (leaves and stems) of S. salignus, exhibited the major inhibition result (I50 79.3 µg/mL) (Figure 1), indicating that it might contain secondary metabolites with inhibitory activity on photosynthesis.
Figure 1. Inhibitory effect of increasing concentrations of n-hexane extract (obtained from aerial parts of S. salignus) on ATP synthesis rate of spinach thylakoids. Control value was 971 µM ATP / mg Chl × h. The data are results of three replicates.
Figure 1. Inhibitory effect of increasing concentrations of n-hexane extract (obtained from aerial parts of S. salignus) on ATP synthesis rate of spinach thylakoids. Control value was 971 µM ATP / mg Chl × h. The data are results of three replicates.
Molecules 17 01437 g001
F30-F54 of the primary fraction obtained from a chromatographic column inhibited ATP synthesis with an I50 value equal to that obtained for the extract. In order to know the compounds involved in this active fraction, a secondary chromatographic fractionation eluting with an ascendant gradient of n-hexane–EtOAc 80:20, and then with acetone 100%, gave a mixture of compounds, spectroscopically identified as β-caryophyllene (1, 3 mg) and caryophyllene oxide (2, 2 mg) [7] (Figure 2).
Figure 2. Structures of β-caryophyllene (1), and caryophyllene oxide (2).
Figure 2. Structures of β-caryophyllene (1), and caryophyllene oxide (2).
Molecules 17 01437 g002

2.2. Effects of 1 and 2 on Germination and Root and Stem Growth of E. cruss-galli and P. ixocarpa

As concentration of caryophyllene oxide increased root elongation of E. crus-galli was partially inhibited (23 and 30% at 100 and 150 µg/mL respectively); the significance values were 0.014 and 1.21 × 10−4 (obtained from the statistical t test for two populations method). The root growth of P. ixocarpa plants was inhibited by 42 to 53%, when concentrations of 1 were varied from 50 to 150 µg/mL with p values of 0.0046 and 1.94 × 10−4 (Table 1). These results are in agreement with the previously reported inhibition of seed germination, root and shoot growth of Brassica. campestris, Raphanus sativus, Lactuca sativa, Mikania micrantha and Achyranthes japonica [8]. On the other hand, compound 2 had no effect on either germination and root and stem growth of E. cruss-galli and P. ixocarpa.
Table 1. β-Caryophyllene inhibition of root, shoot and germination of P. ixocarpa seedlings.
Table 1. β-Caryophyllene inhibition of root, shoot and germination of P. ixocarpa seedlings.
Conc. [µg/mL]Root Elongation (%) pShoot Elongation (%) pGermination (%)
50420.0046160.0750
100446.04 × 10−4180.060
150531.94 × 10−4190.0644

2.3. Postemergence Activity of 1 and 2 on Biomass Production of P. ixocarpa and L. perenne Plants

Compounds 1 and 2 acted inhibiting mainly the dry biomass production of P. ixocarpa plants (Table 2). Compound 1 (100 µM) inhibited the dry biomass of P. ixocarpa plants by 37%, and 2 only by 22%, suggesting that the double bond between carbons 4–5 in the β-caryophyllene molecule is necessary for activity. L. perenne plants were less inhibited by both sesquiterpenes. Figure 3A shows bleached leaves of P. ixocarpa plants treated with 1, after one week and the elongation of the plant decreased (Figure 3B), which are in agreement with the dry biomass and bleaching effect results reported for monoterpene derivatives of another Asteraceae species plant family [9] which inhibits phytoene desaturase, a key enzyme in carotenoid pigment biosynthesis. Since carotenoids protect chlorophyll from photooxidation, their lack would result in loss of chlorophyll. The bleaching of P. ixocarpa leaves caused by β-caryophyllene suggests that it could act as a carotenoid biosynthesis inhibitor. L. perenne plants were less inhibited (15% and 4%) with 1 and 2 (100 µg/mL).
Table 2. Effects of 1 and 2 on biomass production in vivo (measured as dry weight of P. ixocarpa and L. perenne plants grown previously for 18 days before treatment). The data are results of five replicates.
Table 2. Effects of 1 and 2 on biomass production in vivo (measured as dry weight of P. ixocarpa and L. perenne plants grown previously for 18 days before treatment). The data are results of five replicates.
P. ixocarpa L. perenne
Comp / Conc. G%g%
Control0.7203 ± 0.1841001.068 ± 0.031100
DCMU0.533 ± 0.053740.897 ± 0.05484
(1) / [µg/mL]
250.663 ± 0.03921.107 ± 0.142104
500.575 ± 0.021800.879 ± 0.13282
1000.45 ± 0.104630.908 ± 0.19785
(2) / [µg/mL]
250.685 ± 0.055950.953 ± 0.11189
500.654 ± 0.065910.962 ± 0.11790
1000.657 ± 0.02781.02 ± 0.11196
Figure 3. (A) Bleaching of the P. ixocarpa leaves observed on plants after one week treated with: (1) Control; (2) 50 µM DCMU; (3) 50 and (4) 100 µg/mL of β-caryophyllene. (B) shows the plants growth under the effect of: (1) control; (2) control with the solvent (EtOH); (3) 50 and (4) 100 µg/mL of β-caryophyllene and (5) 50 µM DCMU.
Figure 3. (A) Bleaching of the P. ixocarpa leaves observed on plants after one week treated with: (1) Control; (2) 50 µM DCMU; (3) 50 and (4) 100 µg/mL of β-caryophyllene. (B) shows the plants growth under the effect of: (1) control; (2) control with the solvent (EtOH); (3) 50 and (4) 100 µg/mL of β-caryophyllene and (5) 50 µM DCMU.
Molecules 17 01437 g003

2.4. Localization of the Target of 1 on Photosynthetic Electron Transport Chain Studied by the Fluorescence of Chl a in Vivo Technique on Leaves of P. ixocarpa and L. perenne Plants

Chlorophyll a fluorescence is an intrinsic evidence of the photosynthetic system and the intensity of the fluorescence is a direct measure of the PS II activity. The fluorescence induction curve of intact leaves of P. ixocarpa and L. perenne plants, exhibited a polyphasic rise O-J-I-P transient (control leaves) (Figure 4) [10]. The addition of the herbicide DCMU, used as positive control, resulted in a fast rise of fluorescence yield during the first 2 ms of illumination, transforming the regular O-J-I-P sequence into an O-J curve (Figure 4) [10]. The plot on a logarithmic time scale revealed that there are large differences between the control and samples treated with 100 μM of 1, 72 h after treatments (Figure 4).
Figure 4. Fluorescence rise kinetic curves of P. ixocarpa leaves measured 72 h after treatment with 1, 100 µg/mL (▲), control (■) and 50 µM DCMU (○). Data are an average of ten replicates.
Figure 4. Fluorescence rise kinetic curves of P. ixocarpa leaves measured 72 h after treatment with 1, 100 µg/mL (▲), control (■) and 50 µM DCMU (○). Data are an average of ten replicates.
Molecules 17 01437 g004
From the kinetics data of the fluorescence curve measured at 24, 48 and 72 h after treatment on leaves and compared with the control, various parameters were calculated and plotted as a radar graph, a circular graphic with a series of spokes or rays projecting from a central point, with each ray label representing a different variable (Figure 5). Data values were normalized to a common specific range or percentile values. Figure 5 shows the parameters (Strasser et al. [11]) of P. ixocarpa plants affected with 1, Panel A shows the effects at 24 h of treatment. Performance index decreased 25% and 10% at 50 and 100 µg/mL, respectively; and the absorption per reaction center (ABS/RC), the quantum yield for energy dissipation PHI(D0), the trapped energy flux per reaction center TR0/RC and the indicator of the water splitting enzyme function (dV/dt0) all were increased 10% at 100 µg/mL. Furthermore, at 72 h of treatments of P. ixocarpa plants with 1 (100 µg/mL): The electron transport per cross section (ET0/CS) and the maximum quantum yield of primary photochemistry [PHI(P0)] decreased 50% (Figure 5, Panel C). The probability that a trapped exciton moves an electron into the electron transport chain beyond QA− (PSI0), the density of the reaction centers (RC/CS0), the trapping and the electron transport per cross section (TR0/CS and ET0/CS) decreased around 50%; while the following parameters increased up to 20%: dV/dt0, ABS/RC and TR0/RC. These observations suggested that some PSII RCs were transformed to “heat sinks” or “silent reaction centers”; these centers can neither reduce QA and their excitation energy is dissipated as heat [11], this is the reason why PHI(D0) values increase. The mechanism of action of 1 is similar to other natural products like robustaflavone [12]. In panel D the effects of 50 µM of DCMU on the parameters are shown to compare them.
Figure 5. Effect of 1 at 50 (■) and 100 µg/mL (▲) on different calculated parameters from OJIP curves measured on P. ixocarapa plants treated after 24 h (Panel A), 48 h (Panel B) and 72 h (Panel C), and 50 µM DCMU (Panel D) after 72 h of treatment.
Figure 5. Effect of 1 at 50 (■) and 100 µg/mL (▲) on different calculated parameters from OJIP curves measured on P. ixocarapa plants treated after 24 h (Panel A), 48 h (Panel B) and 72 h (Panel C), and 50 µM DCMU (Panel D) after 72 h of treatment.
Molecules 17 01437 g005
Table 3, shows how the active reaction centers (RCSi), calculated as [(ABS/RC)C/(ABS/RC)T × 100] for each treatment; [(ABS/RC)C means for control value and the (ABS/RC)T means the treatments values] decreased in function of time of treatment. Thus 1 (100 µM) at 72 h of treatment decreased 86%, and the increased value of the RE/ET0 parameter is due to the lack of the reduced equivalents of PS II (Figure 5, Panels B and C).
Table 3. Active Reaction Centers calculated as [(ABS/RC)C /ABS/(RC)T] × 100 in control and treated P. ixocarpa plants with β-caryophyllene 50 and 100 mg/mL.
Table 3. Active Reaction Centers calculated as [(ABS/RC)C /ABS/(RC)T] × 100 in control and treated P. ixocarpa plants with β-caryophyllene 50 and 100 mg/mL.
24 h48 h72 h
(1) [µg/mL]ABS/RCActive RC (%)ABS/RCActive RC (%)ABS/RCActive RC (%)
01.91 ± 0.191002.053 ± 0.251002.282 ± 0.27100
251.736 ± 0.111101.992 ± 0.141031.888 ± 0.08120
502.09 ± 0.22912.273 ± 0.13902.66 ± 0.586
1001.98 ± .25963.323 ± 1.496216.13 ± 3.414

3. Experimental

3.1. General

3.1.1. Reagents

Reagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and the salts from J. T. Baker.

3.1.2. Methods

3.1.2.1. Tested Material

Aerial parts of S. salignus were collected in the state of Guerrero, Mexico in 2004 (R. Santiago, collection No R1995) and a voucher specimen was deposited at Facultad de Ciencias UNAM. No 115634. The aerial parts of S. salignus were dried, powdered and extracted exhaustively by maceration at room temperature with n-hexane. The resultant crude extract (22 g) inhibited ATP synthesis (I50 = 79.3 µg/mL) (Figure 1) and was fractionated via column chromatography on silica gel (0.0063–0.200 mm), and eluted with a mixture of increasing polarity gradient of n-hexane–EtOAc. The fractions eluted with n-hexane–EtOAc 90:10 were subjected to a second fractionation and eluted with mixtures of n-hexane–EtOAc of ascendant polarity, and β-caryophyllene and caryophyllene oxide were isolated with hexane–EtOAc 80:20 (Figure 2). The compounds structures were identified by spectroscopic methods with a Bruker DRX 400spectrometer for NMR, for mass spectra an Shimadzu QP5050A device for electron impact (70 eV) low-resolution (EI-MS) was used and for gas chromatography/mass (GC/MS) spectrometry an Shimadzu QP-5050A, equipped with a PTE™-5 was used, to give values consistent with data reported in the literature [7].

3.1.2.2. Chloroplast Isolation and Chlorophyll Determination

Intact chloroplasts were isolated from market spinach leaves (Spinacea oleracea) as reported [13,14]. Chloroplasts were suspended in a small volume of the following solution: 400 mM sucrose, 5 mM MgCl2, 10 mM KCl, and 30 mM N-Tris[hydroxymethyl)methyl]glycine (tricine) pH 8.0 with KOH addition. Chloroplasts were stored as concentrated suspension in the dark for 1 h at 4 °C. The chlorophyll (Chl) concentration was measured according to Strain et al. [15].

3.1.2.3. Determination of ATP Synthesis

Intact chloroplasts (20 μg of Chl /mL) were broken before each assay by osmotic rupture in a solution (3 mL) containing: 100 mM sorbitol, 10 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mM KCN, 1 mM tricine-KOH at pH 8.0 in the presence of 50 μM methylviologen (MV) and 1 mM adenosine diphosphate (ADP) at pH 6.5. The pH was adjusted to 8.0 with 50 mM KOH and ATP synthesis was titrimetrically determined using a microelectrode (Orion Mod. 8103 Ross) connected to a potentiometer (Corning Medical, model 12, Acton, MA, USA) with an expanded scale and a Gilson recorder (Kipp & Zonen, Bohemia, NY, USA). Alkalization rates were measured in the linear part during illumination. The reaction was calibrated by back titration with saturated HCl. The reaction started when turning the light on in the presence of chloroplasts (20 µg of chlorophyll per mL) [14,16]. The I50 value (concentration producing 50% inhibition) for each activity was determined from plots of the activity at different concentrations of compound.

3.1.2.4. Chlorophyll a Fluorescence of PS II

Chlorophyll fluorescence induction curves were measured at room temperature with a Hansatech Handy PEA (Plant Efficient Analyzer) as previously described [12]. The maximum fluorescence yield of PS II was generated using three light-emitting diodes (broad 650 nm). The pulse duration was 2 s, with intensity of 2830 nm and gain of 0.7. Chlorophyll fluorescence determination in vivo, in intact and dark adapted (30 min) leaves, was performed for control and sprayed plants with concentrations of 25, 50 and 100 µg/mL of 1 and 2, after 24, 48 an 72 h of treatments. Data were analyzed and processed with Handy PEA and Biolyzer programs to obtain different photosynthetic parameters associated to PSII, according to the O-J-I-P test equations [14,17]: F0 is the Fluorescence intensity level at 20 μs when plastoquinone electron acceptor pool (QA) is fully oxidized; Fm is the Fluorescence level when QA is transiently fully reduced; M0 is an indication of the water splitting enzyme function calculated as dV/dt0 = 4[(F300 − F0)/(FM − F0)]; ABS/RC is the absorption of photons flux (ABS) per active reaction center (RC) showing the antenna size equal to (M0/VJ)/PHI(P0); ET/RC is the electron transport rate per active reaction center calculated as (M0/VJ)(1 − VJ); TR/RC is the trapped energy flux per RC (at t = 0) equal to M0(1/VJ); dR/RC is the efficiency when an electron moves from the reduced PSII intersystem electron acceptors to the PSI electron acceptors end calculated as (1 − VI/1 − VJ); RE/RC is the reduction of the PSI electron acceptor end side per RC at t = 0 calculated as (dR/RC)(ET/RC); PHI(P0) is the maximum quantum yield of primary photochemistry at P transient (t = 0), it measures the PS II efficiency at plastoquinone pool reduction equal to 1 − (F0/FM); PSI0, calculated as 1 − VJ is the probability (at t = 0) that a trapped exciton moves an electron into the electron transport chain beyond QA; PHI(D0) is the quantum yield (at t = 0) of energy dissipation determined as (FJ − F0)/(FM − F0); VJ, is the fluorescence quantum yield at J transient and used as an indication of PS II efficiency in the primary photochemistry; VI is the relative variable fluorescence at 30 ms calculated as (F30 ms − F0)/(FM − F0); RC/CS determined as PHI(P0)(VJ/M0)(ABS/CS), is the density of the reaction centers; ABS/CS equal to F0, a phenomenological energy flux is the absorption flux per excited cross section; RC/ABS is the fraction of reaction center Chl molecules relative to the total Chl content; PI(abs) is the performance index (PI) on absorption basis calculated as [RC/ABS] × [PHI(P0)/(1 − PHI(P0)] × [PSI0/(1 − PSI0)].

3.1.2.5. Seed Germination Bioassays

Monocot seeds of Echinochloa crus galli L. P. Beauv. an annual grass and dicotyledon seeds of Physalis ixocarpa L. (green tomato) were purchased from Semillas Berentsen, S. A. de C. V. (Celaya, Guanajuato, Mexico). Germination tests were run in triplicate with 40 E. crus galli seeds and 40 P. ixocarpa seeds for each concentration of sample for five days (three days for germination and two days more for root and shoot growth). The number of seeds used for each experiment was selected for that show an appreciable change in O2 uptake that could be detected by the oxygraph (Yellow Spring Instrument) Model 5300. The test seeds were held in the dark at 28 °C in 9.0-cm Petri dishes containing an 8.5-cm sheet of Whatman No. 1 filter paper and 10.0 mL of test or control solution. Dishes were wrapped with Parafilm foil and incubated at 28 °C in the dark. The number of germinated seeds was determined according to the criterion of 1 mm extrusion of the radicle. Germination rates were counted at 72 and 120 h later for root and shoot growth measurements. 1 and 2 were initially dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). The maximum final concentration of DMSO was less than 0.1% and the same DMSO concentration was used in the control solution [18].

3.1.2.6. Plant Material for in Vivo Assays

The seeds of P. ixocarpa and L. perenne, were sown in 12 cm diameter pots and were watered daily in the greenhouse at 27 ± 2 °C. After 15 and 18 days of emergence for P. ixocarpa and L. perenne, respectively, the plants were selected for similar size and were sprayed manually with the 1 and 2 at concentrations of 25, 50 and 100 µg/mL (one stock of 10 mg/mL of each compound was prepared in DMSO). An aliquot of the stock solution was taken to obtain the desired concentration in an aqueous suspension containing 0.05% w/v of polyoxyethylenesorbitan monolaurate (Tween-20). The control samples were sprayed with distilled water containing the same amount of DMSO and Tween-20 [19].

4. Conclusions

Allelochemicals play a role in mediating interspecific interactions [20,21], and various plants enhance competitiveness and fitness [22,23]. β-caryophyllene (1), a well-known volatile sesquiterpene with allelopathic potential, has been reported to inhibit development of seedlings of various plant species [24,25]. In this work, for the first time from the n-hexane extract of aerial parts of S. salignus plants, were isolated β-caryophyllene and caryophyllene oxide. Compound 1 inhibited 42% the root elongation of Physalis ixocarpa seedling at 50 µg/mL and 53% at 150 µg/mL and it inhibited the root elongation of Echinochloa crus-galli to a lesser extent (30% at 150 µg/mL). On the other hand, compound 2 was inactive in both seedlings. Both compounds inhibited the dry biomass of Physalis ixocarpa plants, being β-caryophyllene the most active. The Chl a fluorescence transient in vivo indicated that 100 µg/mL of β-caryophyllene presented a major effect on photosynthesis of P. ixocarpa plants 72 h after treatment, inhibiting PS II by transforming active reaction centers to “heat sinks” or the formation of silent reaction centers, and also induces chlorosis on treated leaves.

Acknowledgments

We thank Facultad de Química (PAIP), UNAM and Dirección General de Asuntos del Personal Académico de la UNAM (DGAPA) for financial support (PAPIIT IN 211309, 205806 and IN 223411) and to Q. A. Acosta for spectroscopic assistance.

References and Notes

  1. Romo de Vivar, A.; Pérez-Castorena, A.-L.; Arciniegas, A.; Villaseñor, J.L. Secondary metabolites from Mexican species of the Tribe senecioneae (Asteraceae). J. Mex. Chem. Soc. 2007, 51, 160–172. [Google Scholar]
  2. Rodríguez, J.; Tello, H.; Quijano, L.; Calderón, J.; Gómez, F.; Romo, J.; Ríos, T. Flavonoids of Mexican plants, isolation and structure of santin and glycoferide. Rev. Latinoamer. Quim. 1974, 5, 41–53. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bohlmann, F.; Zdero, C. Naturally occurring terpene derivatives, LVI. New furoeremophilanes from Mexican Senecio species. Chem. Ber. 1976, 109, 819–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bohlmann, F.; Zdero, C.; Jakupovic, J.; Grenz, M.; Castro, V.; Kino, R.M.; Robinson, H.; Vincent, L.P.D. Further pyrrolizidine alkaloids and furoeremophilanes from Senecio species. Phytochemistry 1986, 25, 1151–1159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Rzedowski, G.C.; de Rzedowski, J. Flora fanerogámica del valle de México. In Comisión nacional para el conocimiento y uso de la biodiversidad, 2nd ed; Instituto de ecologia, A.C. y: Michoacán, Mexico, 2005; p. 1406. [Google Scholar]
  6. Arrhenius, J.H.; Langenheim, L. Sesquiterpenes in leaf pocket resins of Capaifera species. Phytochemistry 1983, 22, 471–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Adams, R.P. Identification of Essential Oil Components by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy; Allured Publishing Co.: Carol Stream, IL, USA, 1995; pp. 94–358. [Google Scholar]
  8. Wang, R.-L.; Staehelin, C.; Peng, S.-L.; Wang, W.-T.; Xie, X.-M.; Lu, H.-N. Responses of Mikania micrantha, an invasive weed to elevated CO2: Induction of β-caryophyllene synthase, changes in emission capability and allelopathic potential of β-caryophyllene. J. Chem. Ecol. 2010, 36, 1076–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Perez-Vasquez, A.; Linares, E.; Bye, R.; Cerda-Garcia-Rojas, C.M.; Mata, R. Phytotoxic activity and conformational analysis of thymol analogs from Hofmeisteria schaffneri. Phytochemistry 2008, 69, 1339–1347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Strasser, R.J.; Srivastava, A.; Govindjee. Polyphasic chlorophyll a fluorescence transients in plants and cyanobacteria. Photochem. Photobiol. 1995, 61, 32–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Strasser, R.J.; Tsimilli-Michael, M.; Srivastava, A. Analysis of chlorophyll a fluorescence transient. In Chlorophyll Fluorescence: A Signature of Photosynthesis; Papageorgiou, G.C., Govindjee, Eds.; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2004; Chapter 12, pp. 321–362. [Google Scholar]
  12. Aguilar, M.I.; Romero, M.G.; Chávez, M.I.; King-Díaz, B.; Lotina-Hennsen, B. Biflavonoids isolated from Selaginella lepidophylla inhibit photosynthesis in spinach chloroplasts. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 6994–7000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Mills, J.D.; Mitchell, P.; Schurrmann, P. Modulation of coupling ATPase activity in intact chloroplasts. FEBS Lett. 1980, 191, 144–148. [Google Scholar]
  14. Torres-Romero, D.; King-Díaz, B.; Strasser, R.J.; Jiménez, I.A.; Lotina-Hennsen, B.; Bazzocchi, I.L. Friedelane triterpenes from Celastrus vulcanicola as photosynthetic inhibitors. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010, 58, 10847–10854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Strain, H.H.; Cope, B.T.; Svec, W.A. Analytical procedures for the isolation, identification, estimation and investigation of the chlorophylls. Meth. Enzymol. 1971, 23, 452–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Dilley, R.A. Ion transport (H+, K+, Mg2+ exchange phenomena). Methods Enzymol. 1972, 24, 68–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Panda, D.; Rao, D.N.; Sharma, S.G.; Strasser, R.J.; Sarkar, R.K. Subemergence effects on rice genotypes during seedling stage: Probing of subemergence driven changes of photosystem II by chlorophyll a fluorescence induction O-J-I-P transients. Photosynthetica 2006, 44, 69–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Céspedes, C.L.; Calderón, J.S.; Salazar, J.R.; Lotina-Hennsen, B.; Segura, R. Plant-growth inhibitory activity of cedrelanolide from Cedrela salvadorensis. J. Chem. Ecol. 2001, 27, 137–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. González-Ibarra, M.; Farfán, N.; Trejo, C.; Uribe, S.; Lotina-Hennsen, B. Selective herbicide activity of 2,5-di(benzylamine)-p-benzoquinone against the monocot weed Echinochloa crus-galli. An in vivo analysis of photosynthesis and growth. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005, 53, 3415–3420. [Google Scholar]
  20. Dicke, M.; Sabelis, M.W.; Takabayashi, J.; Bruin, J.; Posthumus, M.A. Plant strategies of manipulating predator prey interactions through allelochemicals: Prospects for application in pest control. J. Chem. Ecol. 1990, 16, 3091–3118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Duke, S.O. Inderjit. Ecophysiological aspects of allelopathy. Planta 2003, 217, 529–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Singh, H.P.; Batish, D.R.; Kohli, R.K. Allelopathic interactions and allelochemicals new possibilities for sustainable weed management. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2003, 22, 239–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kegge, W.; Pierik, R. Biogenic volatile organic compounds and plant competition. Trends Plant Sci. 2010, 15, 126–132. [Google Scholar]
  24. Kil, B.S.; Han, D.M.; Lee, C.H.; Kim, Y.S.; Yun, K.Y.; Yoo, H.G. Allelopathic effects of Artemisia lavandulaefolia. Korean J. Ecol. 2000, 23, 149–155. [Google Scholar]
  25. Wang, R.L.; Peng, S.L.; Zeng, R.S.; Ding, L.W.; Xu, Z.F. Cloning, expression and wounding induction of β-caryophyllene synthase gene from Mikania micrantha H. B. K. and allelopathic potential of β-caryophyllene. Allelopathy J. 2009, 24, 35–44. [Google Scholar]
  • Sample Availability: Not available.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sánchez-Muñoz, B.A.; Aguilar, M.I.; King-Díaz, B.; Rivero, J.F.; Lotina-Hennsen, B. The Sesquiterpenes β-Caryophyllene and Caryophyllene Oxide Isolated from Senecio salignus Act as Phytogrowth and Photosynthesis Inhibitors. Molecules 2012, 17, 1437-1447. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules17021437

AMA Style

Sánchez-Muñoz BA, Aguilar MI, King-Díaz B, Rivero JF, Lotina-Hennsen B. The Sesquiterpenes β-Caryophyllene and Caryophyllene Oxide Isolated from Senecio salignus Act as Phytogrowth and Photosynthesis Inhibitors. Molecules. 2012; 17(2):1437-1447. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules17021437

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sánchez-Muñoz, B. Arturo, Maria Isabel Aguilar, Beatriz King-Díaz, José Fausto Rivero, and Blas Lotina-Hennsen. 2012. "The Sesquiterpenes β-Caryophyllene and Caryophyllene Oxide Isolated from Senecio salignus Act as Phytogrowth and Photosynthesis Inhibitors" Molecules 17, no. 2: 1437-1447. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules17021437

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop