Next Article in Journal
Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles in Chitosan, Gelatin and Chitosan/Gelatin Bionanocomposites by a Chemical Reducing Agent and Their Characterization
Next Article in Special Issue
Recent Advances in Microflow Photochemistry
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of ASP2151, a Herpesvirus Helicase-Primase Inhibitor, in a Guinea Pig Model of Genital Herpes
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Flow Injection Spectrophotometric Determination of N-Acetyl-L-cysteine as a Complex with Palladium(II)

1
Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry and Technology, Teslina 10/V, 21000 Split, Croatia
2
Department of Mediterranean Agriculture and Aquaculture, University of Zadar, Mihovila Pavlinovića bb, 23000 Zadar, Croatia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2011, 16(9), 7224-7236; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules16097224
Submission received: 18 July 2011 / Revised: 16 August 2011 / Accepted: 17 August 2011 / Published: 25 August 2011
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Flow Chemistry)

Abstract

:
We describe a new method using flow-injection analysis with spectro-photometric detection, suitable for the determination of N-acetyl-l-cysteine (NAC). The proposed method is appropriate for the determination of NAC in reaction with Pd2+ ions in the concentration range from 1.0 × 10−5 mol L−1 to 6.0 × 10−5 mol L−1. The detection limit NAC was 5.84 × 10−6 mol L−1 and the recorded relative standard deviation of the method is in the range from 1.67 to 4.11%. NAC and Pd2+ form complexes of Pd2+:NAC molar ratios of 1:1 and 1:2, depending on the ratio of their analytical concentrations. The cumulative conditional stability constant for the Pd(NAC)22+ complex is β12’ = 2.69 × 109 L2 mol−2. The proposed method was compared with the classic spectrophotometric determination of NAC, using the same reagent, PdCl2, and had shown certain advantages: a) shorter analysis time; b) the use of smaller volumes of sample and reagents, which make the proposed method cheaper and faster for NAC determination in real samples without sample pretreatment.

1. Introduction

N-acetyl-l-cysteine, NAC, is a biologically active substance used as mucolitic agent and as an antidote against paracetamol poisoning. NAC has been determined by direct potentiometry [1,2,3,4,5], different Flow-injection analysis (FIA) methods (potentiometry [6], indirect FIA [7], chemiluminescence-FIA [8]), spectrophotometry [9,10,11,12], spectrophotometric catalytic titration [13,14], enzyme spectrophotometry [14], LC-UV-MS [15] and different chromatographic techniques [16,17,18,19].
Several NAC determination methods by spectrophotometry are described based on formation of the colored compounds using different substances: Fe3+ and ferrozine [9], o-phthalaldehyde and isoleucine [10], or palladium(II) [11]. Penicillamine and cysteine have been determined by FIA spectrophotometry [12]. The NAC complex with palladium(II) has been determined by spectrophotometry in large volumes [11]. Since flow injection determinations have advantages in speed, precision and lower chemical consumption [20], flow-injection analysis using Pd2+ for determination of NAC was applied.

2. Results and Discussion

N-acetyl-l-cysteine reacts with Pd2+ to form a yellow complex; this reaction has been used by Jovanović and Stanković [11] for the spectrophotometric determination of injection formulations. At the chosen experimental conditions large volume spectrophotometric analyses were conducted in order to establish the stoichiometric ratio of the complex and conditional stability constants.
Absorption spectra were recorded over the range 250-700 nm (Figure 1). The complex shows a maximum absorbance at 380 nm, which was therefore used as the wavelength for the determination. At this wavelength N-Acetyl-l-cysteine does not absorb and palladium(II) chloride has a low absorbance. All measurements were performed against a reagent blank.
Influence of pH of the reaction mixture on the amounts of NAC-PdCl2 complex produced is shown on the Figure 2.
The absorbance is similar in the pH range 1.96 to 4.62 and increases at pH 7.00. The probable reason for the rising absorbance of the formed complex at pH = 7 is that by increasing the pH value, the dominant NAC species becomes a deprotonated one. Eventually, the deprotonated NAC species forms a complex with Pd2+. The best NAC - PdCl2 complex spectra were obtained at pH 2. The shape of the absorption spectrum and the position of the maximum of the NAC - PdCl2 complex do not vary with pH, which indicates that under experimental conditions only one type of complex is formed.
The ionic strength has little influence on the course of reaction. Different ionic strengths were adjusted by adding the needed mass of solid NaCl and dissolving in solution of the desired pH value. The best spectrum was obtained at an ionic strength of 0.4 mol L−1 (Figure 3).
The stoichiometric ratio of NAC to Pd2+ in the complex was determined by Job’s continuous variation method (Figure 4). Each of the three curves for three isomolar solution series reaches a single maximum value corresponding to the same mole fraction, [Pd2+]/([Pd2+] + [NAC]), of 0.33, which proves that a single complex compound was formed and that its Pd2+:NAC molar ratio = 1:2. The results were confirmed by the molar ratio method. The plot obtained at constant [NAC] had a maximum value at molar ratio of Pd2+ to NAC of 0.50, which indicated the formation of complex Pd2+ to NAC molar ratio of 1:2.0 (Figure 5). The conditional stability constant K’ of the Pd-NAC complex was calculated by using data of the methods of molar ratios and of the method of continuous variation (Table 1).
At maximum absorbance the concentration of the PdCl2 - NAC complex is equal to analytical concentration of PdCl2 in that point:
A max = c ( Pd 2 + ) a Pd ( NAC ) 2 b  
In every solution i the concentration of complex Pd2+-NAC is:
A i = [ Pd ( NAC ) 2 ] i a Pd ( NAC ) 2 b  
From relations (1) and (2) [Pd(NAC)2]i is calculated. The [Pd2+]i and [NAC]i concentrations are calculated from Equations (3) and (4):
[ Pd 2 + ] i = c ( Pd 2 + ) [ Pd ( NAC ) 2 ] i  
[ NAC ] i = c ( NAC ) 2 [ Pd ( NAC ) 2 ] i  
The cumulative conditional stability constants, β2, are calculated using calculated equilibrium concentrations of Pd(NAC)22+, Pd2+ and NAC and using Equation (5):
β i = [ Pd ( NAC ) 2 2 + ] i [ Pd 2 + ] i [ NAC ] i 2  
The results are presented in Table 1.
Beer’s law was verified in buffer solution at pH 2 (Figure 5).
A linear relationship between the absorbance and the concentration of NAC was obtained over the range 1.0 × 10−5 to 6.0 × 10−4 M NAC. The regression equation was A = 0.1649 × c(NAC) − 0.0166, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9980 (n = 8), indicating good linearity.

2.1. Flow-Injection Analysis

Since the chemical reaction is fast, an equilibrium method can be easily adopted to the FIA technique using the simple manifold as shown in Figure 9. For the analyses a flow cell volume of 80 μL was chosen since calibration curve at 80-μL flow cell was closer to the curve of stationary state than calibration curve of a 160-μL flow cell (Figure 7).
Figure 8 shows the effect of the loop size, coil length, and pumping rate on the peak height. An increase in loop size produces an increase in peak height (Figure 8a); when the volume of NAC injected is 1000 μL the absorbance is high providing relatively high sample throughput of 70 samples per hour. Thus, a 1000 μL loop size was chosen. The pumping rate was increased from 2.5 to 10 mL min−1 (Figure 8b). The maximum absorbance values were at 7.5 mL min−1. Thus, a 7.5 mL min−1 pumping rate was selected. The influence of the coil length was studied between minimum possible distance between the mixing point and the detector and 1.70 m (Figure 8c). The results showed that the peak height continuously decreases with the increase of the reactor length. The complexation reaction occurs instantaneously and by increasing the length of the coil, the dispersion will be higher. Thus, the coil has to be as short as possible, to avoid dispersion effects.
In order to find the optimal concentration of Pd2+ in the reagent solution, the concentration of PdCl2 was varied from 1.0 × 10−5 to 1.5 × 10−3 M. A constant absorbance was achieved for total molar ratios of Pd2+ to NAC higher than 2:1. Thus, the concentration of PdCl2 of 1.2 × 10−3 M was chosen.
The optimal values for the FIA parameters were as follows: injected volume 1,000 μL; reactor length 50 cm, pumping rate 7.5 mL min−1 and PdCl2 concentration 1.2 × 10−3 M. For the described manifold, the calibration graph for the determination of N-acetyl-l-cysteine is linear between 1.0 × 10−5 and 6.0 × 10−4 M. The regression equation was y = 0.008265 × x + 0.011802, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9976. The detection limit [21] was 5.84 × 10−5 M NAC, which was determined by measuring absorbance of the carrier solution and using Equation (6):
c L = 3 s B a b  
where a and b are slope and intercept of the calibration curve, n = 20.
Comparison of our FIA method to the equilibrium method for Pd–NAC determination by spectrophotometry is shown in Table 2. Although the equilibrium method uses a lower concentration of PdCl2, the FIA method has the advantage over the equilibrium method of significantly higher sample throughput.
In Table 3 are given data for the calculated conditional constants of complexes between NAC and Pd2+ in acidic medium at pH = 2 and 25 °C and their compared with conditional constants of complexes between NAC and other transition metals. The palladium and NAC complex has medium stability according to this data.
Table 4 gives a comparison of analytical parameters of three different NAC determination techniques, two of which are FIA methods. The method proposed by Jovanović and Stanković [11] is a classic spectrophotometric analysis and it is very slow in comparison with the FIA methods and can be hardly compared with these. The method of Jovanović and Stanković has a shorter linear response range and greater limit of detection (LOD) in comparing with the FIA methods.
When the FIA method proposed by Sanchez-Pedreño et al. [23] is compared with our proposed FIA method, it can be seen that our method has a lower limit of detection (LOD), works in mildly acidic medium (pH = 2) and the linear response range begins at lower NAC concentrations.
It has also been shown that the proposed FIA method is simple, rapid and accurate and can be applied to the determination of NAC in Fluimukan injections. The precision of determination was studied using three Fluimukan injection samples. The applicability of the method for the assay of simple dosage forms was examined by analyzing Fluimukan injections. The relative standard deviation (RSD) of the method was from 1.67 to 4.11% (n = 5, Table 5). The determination of NAC in Fluimukan samples was performed without any pharmaceutical pretreatment.

3. Experimental

3.1. Apparatus

A Shimadzu 1601-UV spectrophotometer with 10-mm quartz cells was used for recording spectra and absorbance measurements. The flow injection system consisted of a ISMATEC IPC peristaltic pump, injection valve (model V-100, Tecator, Sweden), a Hellma 80 μL and 160 μL flow cells and the Shimadzu 1601-UV spectrophotometer as detector. Connecting tubing and connectors were 0.5 mm i.d. (Rheodyne, USA).

3.2. Reagents

All chemicals were of analytical grade and dissolved in suprapure water made by a Millipore Simplicity system (Millipore, USA). Palladium chloride was supplied by Merck (Germany), sodium hydroxide, hydrochloride acid, acetic acid and phosphorus acid from Kemika (Croatia) were used. N-Acetyl-l-cysteine was supplied by Merck. Fluimukan injections from Lek Ljubljana (Slovenia) were used for testing the method.
Buffer solution, pH = 2, which also used as carrier solution in FIA, was prepared by dissolving acetic acid (4.7980 g), boric acid (4.9464 g) and phosphorus acid (5.4580 g) in suprapure water.
Solution for equilibrium measurements of stability constant and stoichiometric ratio was prepared in a 25-mL volumetric flask by adding appropriate volumes of N-acetyl-l-cysteine and PdCl2 solutions and diluting to the mark with carrier solution. The solutions’ absorbencies were measured as absorbance heights at 380 nm against reagent blank.
FIA measurements were conducted using the simple manifold shown in Figure 1. The carrier solution was prepared by adding NaCl (2.338 g) for constant ionic strength (μ) and buffer pH = 2 (400 mL) to a 1-L volumetric flask, and diluting to the mark with suprapure water. The carrier solution ionic strength was adjusted with 0.4 mol L−1 NaCl. The reagent solution was prepared by adding PdCl2 (0.1068 g), a few drops of concentrated HCl and approximately 400 mL of suprapure water to a 500-mL volumetric flask. The flask was placed in a warm water bath or left overnight to dissolve. Solution was diluted to the mark with suprapure water. The reagent solution was 1.2 × 10−3 mol L−1 PdCl2. The calibration graph was prepared over the range 1 × 10−5 mol L−1 – 6 × 10−4 mol L−1 NAC. Sample volume injected was 1000 μL and solutions absorbencies were measured as the peak height at 380 nm.

4. Conclusions

A new method using flow-injection analysis with spectrophotometric detection suitable for the determination of N-acetyl-l-cysteine (NAC) was described. NAC and Pd2+ form complexes of molar ratio of Pd2+:NAC 1:1 and 1:2, depending on the ratio of their analytical concentrations. The average conditional stability constant for the Pd(NAC)2+ complex is K1’= 6.61 × 105 L mol−1 and for the Pd(NAC)22+ complex is K2’ = 4.07 × 103 L2 mol−2. Molar absorption coefficient for Pd(NAC)2+ is 1,599.8 ± 36, n = 20 and for Pd(NAC)22+ is 3,875.6 ± 23, n = 20. The NAC detection limit is 5.84 × 10−6 mol L−1 and relative standard deviation of the method ranges from 1.67 to 4.11% for determination of NAC in real samples without pretreatment. The proposed method is appropriate for determination of NAC in the concentration range from 1.0 × 10−5 mol L−1 to 6.0 × 10−4 mol L−1 in reaction with Pd2+ ions. The proposed method was compared with the classic spectrophotometric determination of NAC, using the same reagent, PdCl2, and had shown certain advantages in a shorter time of analysis, and the use of smaller volumes of sample and reagents, which means the proposed method for NAC determination in real samples is cheaper and faster without sample pretreatment.

References and Notes

  1. Komljenović, J.; Radić, Nj. Potentiometric determination of N-acetylcysteine based on its reduction action on Fe(III). Acta Pharm. 1993, 43, 99–106. [Google Scholar]
  2. Jovanović, T.; Stanković, B.; Stefanović, A. Determination of N-acetyl-l-cysteine by potentiometric titration. Pharmazie 1987, 42, 136–137. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  3. Kolar, M.; Dobcnik, D. Chemically prepared silver electrode for determination of N-acetyl-l-cysteine by flow-injection potentiometry. Pharmazie 2003, 58, 25–28. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  4. Martinovic, A.; Radic, Nj. Kinetic Potentiometric Determination of some Thiols with Iodide Ion-Sensitive Electrode. Anal. Lett. 2003, 40, 2851–2859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Martinovic, A.; Radic, Nj. Kinetic Potentiometric Determination of Penicillamine and N-acetyl-l-cysteine Based on Reaction with Iodate. Acta Chim. Slov. 2009, 56, 503–506. [Google Scholar]
  6. Radić, Nj.; Komljenović, J. Determination of N-acetyl-l-cysteine by flow-injection potentiometry. Fresenius J. Anal. Chem. 1998, 360, 675–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Vieira, H.J.; Fatibello-Filho, O. Indirect flow injection determination of N-acetyl-l-cysteine using cerium(IV) and ferroin. Quim. Nova 2005, 28, 797–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Vinas, P.; Lopez Garcia, L.; Martinez Gil, J.A. Determination of thiol-containing drugs by chemiluminescence-flow injection analysis. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 1993, 11, 15–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Maher, A.E. Spectrophotometric determination of cysteine and N-acetylcysteine in pharmaceutical preparations. Mikrochim. Acta 1998, 129, 91–95. [Google Scholar]
  10. Garcia Alvarez-Coque, M.C.; Medina Hernandez, M.J.; Villanueva Camañas, R.M.; Mongay Fernendez, C. Spectrophotometric determination of N-acetylcysteine in drug formulations with o-phtalaldehyde and isoleucine. Analyst 1989, 114, 975–977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jovanović, T.; Stanković, B. Use of palladium(II) chloride as a color-forming reagent for the determination of N.acetyl-l-cysteine in water and Fluimukan injections. Analyst 1989, 114, 401–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Garcia, M.S.; Sanchez-Pedreño, C.; Albero, M.I.; Rodenas, V. Determination of penicillamine or tiopronin in pharmaceutical preparations by flow injection analyses. J. Pharm. Biom. Anal. 1993, 11, 633–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Viñas, P.; Hernandez-Cordoba, M.; Sanchez-Pedreño, C. Catalytic titration of N-penicillamine, N-acetilcysteine, cysteine and 2-mercaptopropionylglycine. Analyst 1990, 115, 757–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lopez-Garcia, I.; Viñas, P.; Martinez Gil, J.A. FIA titrations of sulphide, cysteine and thiol-containing drugs with chemiluminescent detection. Fresenius J. Anal. Chem. 1993, 345, 723–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ogwu, V.; Cohen, G. A simple colorimetric method for the simultaneous determination of N-acetylcysteine and cysteine. Free Rad. Biol. Med. 1998, 25, 362–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Toussaint, B.; Pitti, Ch.; Streel-Ceccato, B.; Hubert, A.Ph.; Crommen, J. Quantitative analysis of N-acetylcysteine and its pharmacopeial impurities in a pharmaceutical formulation by liquid chromatography-UV detection-mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A 2000, 896, 191–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Harada, D.; Naito, S.; Kawauchi, Y.; Ishikawa, K.; Koshitani, O.; Hiraoka, I.; Otagiri, M. Determination of Reduced, Protein-Unbound, and Total Concentrations of N-Acetyl-l-cysteine and l-Cysteine in Rat Plasma by Postcolumn Ligand Substitution High-Performance Liquid Chromatography. Anal. Biochem. 2001, 290, 251–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Stanek, W.; Krenmayr, P.; Scherer, G.; Schmid, E.R. Quantitative determination of N-acetyl(-l-)cysteine derivatives in human urine by tandem mass spectrometry. Biol. Mass Spectrom. 1993, 22, 133–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Celma, C.; Allué, J.A.; Pruñonosa, J.; Peraire, C.; Obach, R. Determination of N-acetyl-l-cysteine in human plasma by liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A 2000, 870, 13–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Valcarcel, M.; Luque de Castro, M.D. Flow-Injection Analyses—Principals and Applications; Ellis Horwood Limited: Chichester, UK, 1987. [Google Scholar]
  21. Long, L.G.; Winefordner, J.D. Limit of detection, a closer look at the IUPAC definition. Anal. Chem. 1983, 55, 712A–724A. [Google Scholar]
  22. Güzeloglu, S.; Yalçin, G.; Pekin, M. The determination of stability constants of N-acetyl-l-cysteine chrome, nickel, cobalt and iron complexes by potenciometric method. J. Organometal. Chem. 1998, 568, 143–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Sanchez-Pedreño, C.; Albero, M.I.; Garcia, M.S.; Rodenas, V. Determination of N-Acetylcysteine in Pharmaceutical Samples by Flow Injection. Analyst 1992, 117, 925–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sample Availability: Not available.
Figure 1. Absorption spectra of: (1) N-Acetyl-l-cysteine; (2) PdCl2; (3) the NAC-Pd2+ complex. [NAC] = 2 × 10−4 mol L−1; [Pd2+] = 5 × 10−4 mol L−1; pH = 3; μ = 0.2 mol L−1.
Figure 1. Absorption spectra of: (1) N-Acetyl-l-cysteine; (2) PdCl2; (3) the NAC-Pd2+ complex. [NAC] = 2 × 10−4 mol L−1; [Pd2+] = 5 × 10−4 mol L−1; pH = 3; μ = 0.2 mol L−1.
Molecules 16 07224 g001
Figure 2. Effect of pH on complex formation: [NAC] = 2 × 10−4 M; [Pd2+] = 5 × 10−4 mol L−1; pH = 3; μ = 0.2 mol L−1. (1) pH = 1.96; (2) pH = 3.52; (3) pH = 4.62; (4) pH = 5.33; (5) pH = 7.00.
Figure 2. Effect of pH on complex formation: [NAC] = 2 × 10−4 M; [Pd2+] = 5 × 10−4 mol L−1; pH = 3; μ = 0.2 mol L−1. (1) pH = 1.96; (2) pH = 3.52; (3) pH = 4.62; (4) pH = 5.33; (5) pH = 7.00.
Molecules 16 07224 g002
Figure 3. Effect of ionic strength on complex formation: [NAC] = 1 × 10−4 mol L−1; [Pd2+] = 5 × 10−4 mol L−1; pH = 2, (1) μ = 0.1 mol L−1; (2) μ = 0.4 mol L−1; (3) μ = 0.6 mol L−1, (4) μ = 0.8 mol L−1.
Figure 3. Effect of ionic strength on complex formation: [NAC] = 1 × 10−4 mol L−1; [Pd2+] = 5 × 10−4 mol L−1; pH = 2, (1) μ = 0.1 mol L−1; (2) μ = 0.4 mol L−1; (3) μ = 0.6 mol L−1, (4) μ = 0.8 mol L−1.
Molecules 16 07224 g003
Figure 4. Job’s plot for isomolar solution series: (1) [Pd2+] + [NAC] = 8 × 10−4 mol L−1; (2) [Pd2+] + [NAC] = 4 × 10−4 mol L−1; (3) [Pd] + [NAC] = 2 × 10−4 mol L−1; pH = 2; μ = 0.4 mol L−1.
Figure 4. Job’s plot for isomolar solution series: (1) [Pd2+] + [NAC] = 8 × 10−4 mol L−1; (2) [Pd2+] + [NAC] = 4 × 10−4 mol L−1; (3) [Pd] + [NAC] = 2 × 10−4 mol L−1; pH = 2; μ = 0.4 mol L−1.
Molecules 16 07224 g004
Figure 5. Molar ratio method: [NAC] = 4 × 10−4 mol L−1; pH = 2; μ = 0.4 mol L−1.
Figure 5. Molar ratio method: [NAC] = 4 × 10−4 mol L−1; pH = 2; μ = 0.4 mol L−1.
Molecules 16 07224 g005
1 - molar ratios method at constant [Pd2+] of 1.0 × 10−4 M; 2 - molar ratios method at constant [NAC] of 4.0 × 10−4 M; 3 - continuous variation method, isomolar solution series 1; 4 - continuous variation method, isomolar solution series 2.
Figure 6. Calibration curve. [Pd2+] = 5 × 10−4 M, pH = 2, μ = 0.4 mol L−1.
Figure 6. Calibration curve. [Pd2+] = 5 × 10−4 M, pH = 2, μ = 0.4 mol L−1.
Molecules 16 07224 g006
Figure 7. Effect of flow cell volume on peak height. Injection loop, V = 1000 μL, pumping rate Q = 7.5 mL min−1.
Figure 7. Effect of flow cell volume on peak height. Injection loop, V = 1000 μL, pumping rate Q = 7.5 mL min−1.
Molecules 16 07224 g007
Figure 8. Effect of loop size: (a), pumping rate; (b) reactor length; (c) on the peak height. Sample injected 4.0 × 10−4 mol L−1 NAC.
Figure 8. Effect of loop size: (a), pumping rate; (b) reactor length; (c) on the peak height. Sample injected 4.0 × 10−4 mol L−1 NAC.
Molecules 16 07224 g008
Figure 9. FIA manifold for the determination of N-acetyl-l-cysteine.
Figure 9. FIA manifold for the determination of N-acetyl-l-cysteine.
Molecules 16 07224 g009
Table 1. Cumulative conditional stability constant (β’) of the Pd(NAC)22+ complex. Conditions: pH = 2; μ = 0.4 mol L−1.
Table 1. Cumulative conditional stability constant (β’) of the Pd(NAC)22+ complex. Conditions: pH = 2; μ = 0.4 mol L−1.
log K ¯ = logβ2Method
9.011
8.132
8.113
8.454
8.43, RSD = 4.98%log K ¯
Table 2. Comparison of analytical parameters for two methods of NAC determination.
Table 2. Comparison of analytical parameters for two methods of NAC determination.
ParameterEquilibrium methodFIA method
calibration range1 × 10−5 – 6 × 10−4 mol L−1 NAC1 × 10−5 – 6 × 10−4 mol L−1 NAC
Molar absorption coefficient, ε / L mol−1 cm−1Pd(NAC)2+: 1599.8 ± 36, n = 20
Pd(NAC)22+: 3875.6 ± 23, n = 20
coefficient of determination, R20.99800.9976
PdCl2 concentration 5.0 × 10−4 mol L−11.2 × 10−3 mol L−1
sample throughput per hour3070
Table 3. Conditional constants of forming complexes between NAC and different metals.
Table 3. Conditional constants of forming complexes between NAC and different metals.
MetallogK1logK2logβ2
Cr3+ a8.266.7415.00
Co2+ a4.183.627.80
Ni2+ a5.024.329.34
Fe3+ a10.588.2218.80
Pd2+ b 4.823.618.43
a μ = 0.12 mol L−1 (NaClO4), t = 25 °C22; b this work
Table 4. Comparison of analytic parameters for three different techniques for NAC determination.
Table 4. Comparison of analytic parameters for three different techniques for NAC determination.
Analytical parametersClassic Spectrophotometric analysis [11]FIA Spectrophotometric analysis [23]FIA Spectrophotometric analysis a
Linear response range, mol L−1 NAC2.45 × 10−5 – 4 × 10−45 × 10−5 – 5 × 10−31 × 10−5 – 6 × 10−4
Correlation factor (R)0.99700.99950.9980
μ, mol L−10.21.00.4
pH4.6402
LOD, mol L−1 2.0 × 10−51.6 × 10−55.84 × 10−6
Reproducibility (RSD) / %0.63 – 1.92 1.4, n = 101.04 – 1.22, n = 10
Recovery (RSD) / %0.70, n = 7N/A1.67 – 4.11, n = 3
Table 5. Determination of NAC in real samples.
Table 5. Determination of NAC in real samples.
Labeled, mgFound ±SD (%)
(n = 5)
Recovery (%)
Fluimukan®100101.2 ± 4.11101.23
200203.2 ± 2.54101.60
600603.3 ± 1.67100.55

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Giljanović, J.; Brkljača, M.; Prkić, A. Flow Injection Spectrophotometric Determination of N-Acetyl-L-cysteine as a Complex with Palladium(II). Molecules 2011, 16, 7224-7236. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules16097224

AMA Style

Giljanović J, Brkljača M, Prkić A. Flow Injection Spectrophotometric Determination of N-Acetyl-L-cysteine as a Complex with Palladium(II). Molecules. 2011; 16(9):7224-7236. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules16097224

Chicago/Turabian Style

Giljanović, Josipa, Mia Brkljača, and Ante Prkić. 2011. "Flow Injection Spectrophotometric Determination of N-Acetyl-L-cysteine as a Complex with Palladium(II)" Molecules 16, no. 9: 7224-7236. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules16097224

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop