Next Article in Journal
Network Pharmacology of Ginseng (Part II): The Differential Effects of Red Ginseng and Ginsenoside Rg5 in Cancer and Heart Diseases as Determined by Transcriptomics
Previous Article in Journal
Phenotypic Switching of B16F10 Melanoma Cells as a Stress Adaptation Response to Fe3O4/Salicylic Acid Nanoparticle Therapy
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Pharmaceuticals
Volume 14
Issue 10
10.3390/ph14101009
pharmaceuticals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

HIV-1 Reverse Transcriptase Inhibition by Major Compounds in a Kenyan Multi-Herbal Composition (CareVid™): In Vitro and In Silico Contrast

by
Winnie Rotich
1,
Nicholas J. Sadgrove
2,*,
Eduard Mas-Claret
2,
Guillermo F. Padilla-González
2,
Anastasia Guantai
3 and
Moses K. Langat
2
1
Sigowet-Soin Sub-County Hospital, Sondu-Kapsoit Road, Sigowet, Kericho County, P.O. Box 112, Kericho 20200, Kenya
2
Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Kew Green, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3AE, UK
3
Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacognosy, School of Pharmacy, University of Nairobi, P.O. Box 19676-00202, Nairobi 00100, Kenya
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pharmaceuticals 2021, 14(10), 1009; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph14101009
Submission received: 25 August 2021 / Revised: 22 September 2021 / Accepted: 28 September 2021 / Published: 30 September 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Natural Products)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
CareVid is a multi-herbal product used in southwest Kenya as an immune booster and health tonic and has been anecdotally described as improving the condition of HIV-positive patients. The product is made up of roots, barks and whole plant of 14 African medicinal plants: Acacia nilotica (L.) Willd. ex Delile (currently, Vachelia nilotica (L.) P.J.H Hurter & Mabb.), Adenia gummifera (Harv.) Harms, Anthocleista grandiflora Gilg, Asparagus africanus Lam., Bersama abyssinica Fresen., Clematis hirsuta Guill. & Perr., Croton macrostachyus Hochst. ex Delile, Clutia robusta Pax (accepted as Clutia kilimandscharica Engl.), Dovyalis abyssinica (A. Rich.) Warb, Ekebergia capensis Sparm., Periploca linearifolia Quart.-Dill. & A. Rich., Plantago palmata Hook.f., Prunus africana Hook.f. Kalkman and Rhamnus prinoides L’Her. The objective of this study was to determine the major chemical constituents of CareVid solvent extracts and screen them for in vitro and in silico activity against the HIV-1 reverse transcriptase enzyme. To achieve this, CareVid was separately extracted using CH2Cl2, MeOH, 80% EtOH in H2O, cold H2O, hot H2O and acidified H2O (pH 1.5–3.5). The extracts were analysed using HPLC–MS equipped with UV diode array detection. HIV-1 reverse transcriptase inhibition was performed in vitro and compared to in silico HIV-1 reverse transcriptase inhibition, with the latter carried out using MOE software, placing the docking on the hydrophobic pocket in the subdomain of p66, the NNRTI pocket. The MeOH and 80% EtOH extracts showed strong in vitro HIV-1 reverse transcriptase inhibition, with an EC50 of 7 μg·mL−1. The major components were identified as sucrose, citric acid, ellagic acid, catechin 3-hexoside, epicatechin 3-hexoside, procyanidin B, hesperetin O-rutinoside, pellitorine, mangiferin, isomangiferin, 4-O-coumaroulquinic acid, ellagic acid, ellagic acid O-pentoside, crotepoxide, oleuropein, magnoflorine, tremulacin and an isomer of dammarane tetrol. Ellagic acid and procyanidin B inhibited the HIV-1 reverse transcription process at 15 and 3.2 µg/mL−1, respectively. Docking studies did not agree with in vitro results because the best scoring ligand was crotepoxide (ΔG = −8.55 kcal/mol), followed by magnoflorine (ΔG = −8.39 kcal/mol). This study showed that CareVid has contrasting in vitro and in silico activity against HIV-1 reverse transcriptase. However, the strongest in vitro inhibitors were ellagic acid and procyanidin B.

1. Introduction

In the developing world, a large fraction of the population is dependent on herbal remedies as their primary form of healthcare. In Africa, wild harvested medicines are commonly used in the form of bark or root [1] because it is believed that these organs have a higher accumulation of secondary metabolites. Bark and root medicines are dried, powdered and extracted into an aqueous solution with heat and consumed as a potent tea. While it is common for these therapies to be administered for acute conditions, such as gastrointestinal disturbance or fevers, there is no dearth of clients with chronic diseases, such as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), that benefit from herbal prescriptions by attenuating symptoms, delaying their inevitable mortality, or treating comorbidities. Although there is plenty of scope for multi-herbal compositions to stand in as adjuvant therapies to mainstream treatments for HIV, the financial barrier to acquiring antiretroviral therapies in the remote regions of Kenya [2] means that such therapies become primary, which has persuaded herbalists to innovate multi-herbal compositions to give people with a lower socioeconomic status who are living with HIV a better quality of life.
As of 2021, the global prevalence of people living with HIV is over 37.7 million [3], with a normal mean of 680,000 people dying annually because of compromised access to life-saving treatments that should ideally be cheap and easily available. HIV has two types—type 1 (HIV-1) and type 2 (HIV-2). HIV-1 is the principal variant that causes chronic disease because it decreases the body’s immune cell count (CD4 cells), leading to acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), which predisposes one to life-threatening opportunistic infections [4]. Because of socioeconomic barriers to antiretroviral therapy in African countries, and the suboptimal adherence to these therapies in middle class youth [5], people commonly progress from HIV infection to AIDS. Hence, the control of infections due to HIV is a major challenge in these low-income countries [6,7,8,9].
Numerous reports describe the use of herbal concoctions against HIV and related complications [10,11]. Concomitant with increasing prevalence of HIV infection is the commercialisation of herbal medicines, which has dramatically risen in the last 10 years, as evidenced by the rising number of African traditional medicine (ATM) traders [12]. As part of this upsurge, the CareVid multi-herbal formulation was realised, which has its origins in southwest Kenya, in Kericho county.
The CareVid therapy is now a protected invention that is a popular adjuvant therapy for HIV in Kenya, whose formula is published in several patents [13,14]. As previously mentioned, the herbal product is steeped in hot water and taken as a tea. Currently, there is mounting anecdotal evidence that its composition supports the body’s resistance to viral infection. People living with HIV who have used CareVid reported increased CD4 cell counts [13,14].
The use of traditional medicines presents probable opportunities to discover workable and socially acceptable HIV treatments for use as adjuvants to antiretroviral therapies. The industry also creates jobs and revenue streams for a substantial number of grassroots-level businesses. However, traditional medicines that are purportedly effective against serious diseases should be subjected to some form of empirical analysis to allay concerns regarding safety, efficacy, and additive benefits [15]. Realisation of a positive therapeutic outcome in vitro is feasible because several natural products from plants [16] and marine organisms [17] have already been reported to have anti-HIV effects.
In this study, the tea was extracted and analysed by HPLC–MS to determine the dominant chemical components; then, pure authentic standards were screened for reverse transcription inhibitory effects. HIV-1 reverse transcriptase (RT) has both RNA-dependent ribonuclease H (RNase H) and DNA polymerase (RDDP) activities that work in tandem to translate viral genomic single-stranded RNA to double-stranded DNA, which is then integrated into the DNA of the infected host cell [18]. RT-associated RDDP and RNase H functions are essential for HIV-1 genome replication. Among HIV-1 RT inhibitors, non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTI) constitute a prominent class of drugs, which, for almost 20 years, has served as the cornerstone of combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) [19,20]. NNRTI are small molecules that bind to HIV-1 RT at a site distinct from the DNA polymerase active site of the enzyme and block HIV-1 reverse transcription via an allosteric mechanism of action [19]. The conformation of RT for RNA hydrolysis is distinctly different from that for DNA synthesis and reveals a structural cavity, which serves as a target for RT inhibition [21].
The specific objectives of the study included: (i) to describe the major chemical constituents of CareVid that are present in CH2Cl2, MeOH, 80% EtOH in H2O, cold H2O, hot H2O, and acidified H2O (pH 1.5–3.5) using HPLC–MS, (ii) to subject the extracts and the major constituents to in vitro HIV-1 reverse transcriptase inhibition, and (iii) to conduct in silico HIV-1 reverse transcriptase inhibition of the major constituents.

2. Results

2.1. Chemical Analysis

The major components of the MeOH extract were identified as sucrose (1), citric acid (2), catechin 3-hexoside (3), epicatechin 3-hexoside (4), procyanidin dimer (5), mangiferin (6), isomangiferin (7), 4-O-coumaroulquinic acid (8), ellagic acid O-pentoside (9), hesperetin O-rutinoside also known as hesperidin (10a), ellagic acid (10b), oleuropein (11), tremulacin (12), magnoflorine (13), crotepoxide (14), unidentified alkaloid (15), pellitorine (16) and an isomer of dammarane tetrol (17) (Figure 1 and Figure 2, Table S1). Authentic standards were obtained for 5, 6, 10a, 10b, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 16 and their relative quantities in the MeOH extract was determined semi-quantitatively as 2.8%, 0.54%, 1.41%, 0.49%, 1.83%, 0.92%, 3.26%, 1.8%, and 1.19%, respectively.
Some of these components can be traced to the herbal ingredients by a cross-examination of the published literature, i.e., catechin 3-hexoside [22], ellagic acid and ellagic acid O-pentoside [23] have been reported from Acacia nilotica. Magnoflorine is expressed by a climber plant on Acacia nilotica [24], but is also known from a species in Croton. Crotepoxide was reported from Croton macrostachyus [25], tremulacin from Dovyalis abyssinica [26], and mangiferin has been reported from Bersama abyssinica [27].

2.2. Docking Results

The docking studies were performed using HIV-1 RT in complex with the known inhibitor Nevirapine obtained from the RCSB Protein data bank (PDB ID 1JLB). Nevirapine is a dipyridodiazepinone discovered in 1990 and was FDA approved in 1996 for use as a first-generation NNRTI [28]. Its use in combination with two NRTIs is recommended for first line therapy in developing countries. After the crystal structure of RT complexed with Nevirapine was first published [29], several complexes with RT mutants have been published in order to study the mechanisms of action and drug resistance [30]. Nevirapine, like other NNRTIs, inhibits RT by binding the hydrophobic pocket of the p66 subunit, which has a destabilising effect that reduces the interactions of the polymerase domain with DNA [31].
To validate the docking protocol, Nevirapine was removed from the binding pocket and redocked. The Root Mean Square Deviation (RMSD) value from the known co-crystallised conformation was 0.5582 Å. The method is considered successful when values below 1.5–2 Å are obtained [32]. After method validation, the ligands were energy minimised, and MOE 2015 was used to determine their free energy of binding (ΔG) (Table 1). As expected, the variety of molecular weights and structural motifs of the ligands studied led to a wide distribution of calculated energy of binding values. Crotepoxide 14 and magnoflorine 13 gave the best predicted affinity (ΔG −8.55, −8.39 kcal/mol, respectively), with predicted inhibition constants at the high nanomolar level.
Crotepoxide 14 presents π-stacking interaction between its aryl group and Trp229, as the position of the phenyl moiety shifts slightly compared to that of the pyrido group of Nevirapine (Figure 3 and Figure 4). Presenting an aromatic moiety at this position could contribute importantly to the energy of binding, as it is placed in an aromatic-rich subpocket consisting of Tyr181, Tyr188, Phe227 and Trp229. Trp229 also contributes to the binding affinity of magnoflorine 13, in this case, with a π–H interaction with one of its hydroxy groups. Additionally, the isopropyl group of Val106 stablishes a second π–H interaction with 13.
The highest scoring ligand crotepoxide 14 presents one of its acetyl groups occupying a similar position to that of the cyclopropyl group in Nevirapine (Figure 3), thus stablishing a hydrophobic interaction with the pocket found in the active site and contributing favourably to the free energy of binding.
On the other hand, ellagic acid, which was one of the most active compounds in vitro, showed a slightly higher value of predicted free energy of binding (ΔG −6.80 kcal/mol). In this case, the key π-stacking interactions with aromatic residues in the subpocket are not observed. Instead, there is hydrogen bonding present between Lys101 and one of the hydroxy groups of the ligand (Figure 5). Procyanidin B1 and B2 also showed high in vitro activity, but presented very poor free energy of binding in the docking results, which suggests that their activity could be caused by a different mechanism of action.

2.3. In Vitro Reverse Transcription Inhibition

Polar extracts demonstrated the lowest EC50 values against reverse transcription using the HIV-1 reverse transcriptase enzyme (Table 2). With values as low as 7 μg·mL−1, these alcoholic extracts were slightly more active than the aqueous extracts, which were >10 μg·mL−1. Assay of the authentic standards clarified that this activity is related to the presence of procyanidin B and ellagic acid, which had EC50 values of 3.2 and 15.3 μg·mL−1. Other components that demonstrated moderate activity include tremulacin (539.5 μg·mL−1) and hesperidin (624.1 μg·mL−1).

3. Discussion

In a U.S. Patent (No. 7,556,830), it is described that the CareVid formula was developed after 50 plants known to Kenyan traditional medicine for their anti-infectious properties were assayed to determine potency, and 14 of the most active plants were formulated as CareVid [13,14]. The 14 plants are Acacia nilotica (L.) Willd. ex Delile (currently, Vachelia nilotica (L.) P.J.H Hurter & Mabb.), Adenia gummifera (Harv.) Harms, Anthocleista grandiflora Gilg, Asparagus africanus Lam., Bersama abyssinica Fresen., Clematis hirsuta Guill. & Perr., Croton macrostachyus Hochst. ex Delile, Clutia robusta Pax (accepted as Clutia kilimandscharica Engl.), Dovyalis abyssinica (A. Rich.) Warb, Ekebergia capensis Sparm., Periploca linearifolia Quart.-Dill. & A. Rich., Plantago palmata Hook.f., Prunus africana Hook.f. Kalkman and Rhamnus prinoides L’Her (Table 3).
Table
Table 3. Documented ethnomedicinal uses of the 14 medicinal plants.
Table 3. Documented ethnomedicinal uses of the 14 medicinal plants.
Plant NameLocal NamesPlant PartTraditional Use on HIV and Other Related DiseasesReferences
Acacia nilotica (L.) Willd. ex Delile ChebitetStem barkChest pains, coughs, pneumonia, tuberculosis, coughs
Gastrointestinal problems (diarrhoea)		[33]
Adenia gummifera (Harv.) HarmsKinyelwetRoots Oral candidiasis, Respiratory infections (chest pains, colds, cough and tuberculosis), Sexually transmitted infections (gonorrhoea and venereal diseases) [34,35,36,37,38]
Anthocleista grandiflora Gilg MosombobetStem barkChest pains[39]
Asparagus africanus Lam.BirirwapsotRootsTuberculosis, venereal diseases[40]
Bersama abyssinica Fresen.Cheptorwoget Stem barkSexually transmitted infections (gonorrhoea and venereal diseases)[41]
Clematis hirsuta Guill. & Perr.BisingwetRoots Pain management
Sexually transmitted infections (gonorrhoea and venereal diseases)		[42,43]
Croton macrostachyus Hochst. ex DelileTebeswuet Stem barkSexually transmitted infections (gonorrhoea and venereal diseases)
Chest problems		[44,45]
Clutia robusta PaxKurbanyatRoots Diarrhoea, gonorrhoea, chest pains[45]
Dovyalis abyssinica (A.Rich.) WarbNukiatRoots Sexually transmitted infections (gonorrhoea and venereal diseases)
Gastrointestinal problems		[46,47]
Ekebergia capensis SparmArorwet Stem barkRespiratory problems (chest pains, cold, cough, respiratory complaints)
Sexually transmitted infections (gonorrhoea and venereal diseases)
Mouth sores		[48,49]
Periploca linearifolia Quart.-Dill. & A.Rich.SinendetRootsCough and Pneumonia
Sexually transmitted infections (gonorrhoea and venereal diseases), warts, Diarrhoea		[36]
Plantago palmata Hook.f.ChepinderemWhole plantSexually transmitted infections (gonorrhoea and venereal diseases)
Gastrointestinal problems		[50]
Prunus Africana Hook.f. KalkmanTendwetStem barkProstate cancer, Benign prostate hypertrophy
Chest infections
Diarrhoea 		[51,52]
Rhamnus prinoides L’Her.KosisitietRootsSexually transmitted diseases
Respiratory infections
Gastrointestinal infections
Tuberculosis 		[53,54,55]
The inventor claims that a female HIV-positive relative who did not respond well to antiretroviral therapy, had her condition improved on using the tea. Subsequently, twenty-six HIV-positive patients in Kericho volunteered to take the decoction, which was administered as a liquid produced by steeping two grams of CareVid in 250 mL of hot water for 5 min, and taken twice a day [13,14]. After two months, two patients felt clinically well and requested a viral load test at a VCT Centre and were determined to be below detection, which is commonly achieved by using antiretroviral therapies but is rarely a validated outcome from exclusive use of natural medicines. By the fourth month six more patients were determined as having viral load below detection. Because none of these patients declared the use of antiretroviral therapies it is of interest if the multi-herbal formulation of CareVid has a stand-alone benefit to human responders in the context of HIV infection [13,14].
While there are various mechanisms by which metabolites can antagonise the life cycle of the HIV-1 virion, the current study focused on a single pathway, the reverse transcription process. For any natural product to achieve therapeutic effects via this pathway, the EC50 should conform to a realistic pharmacokinetic metric [56], such as a physiologically relevant concentration and good bioavailability. Hence, ingredients with EC50 values at >20 μg·mL−1 may be regarded as unrealistic in the translation of in vitro results to in vivo outcomes. Nevertheless, these concentrations were determined as a matter of interest to make a comparison to the results of the in silico study. It was revealed that there was no agreement, and this could be for multiple reasons. The docking approach focused on candidates that are compatible with the binding pocket of nevirapine. Yet, other reverse transcriptase inhibitors, such as zidovudine, antagonise the process by competing with nucleotides and incorporating into the viral DNA strand, causing chain termination due to the lack of a 3′ OH group.
A mechanism for either ellagic acid or procyanidin could be the precipitation of the enzyme, or the compromising of nucleotides. Because of the poor pharmacokinetics of procyanidins [57] and ellagic acid, it may be necessary to consider similar catabolised forms that are created in human digestion. For example, ellagic acid is produced in human digestion by acid hydrolysis of ellagitannins in the stomach. However, ellagic acid is incapable of achieving systemic concentrations high enough to enact the effects of the current in vitro outcome, because high doses of ellagic acid promote microbial processes leading to catabolism of ellagic acid into a urolithin. This creates a high systemic concentration of the urolithins [58]. If urolithins are capable of inhibiting the reverse transcription process at the same concentration as the precursor ellagitannin, then viral inhibition is feasible. It is encouraged to examine the urolithins in a follow up study and ellagic acid may be considered as a suitable prodrug moving forward. Ellagic acid is ubiquitously expressed throughout the plant kingdom, as the hydrolysable precursor of ellagitannin, which is abundant in roots, rhizomes, and bark.
Furthermore, the current study should be followed up by screening against other targets of the HIV-1 virion life cycle, such as integrase or protease inhibition. Nevertheless, if the tea extract is subjected to a bioassay-guided fractionation, then further compounds can be investigated beyond the authentic reference standards used in the current study.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Sample Preparation

Six different types of solvent were used to produce six crude extracts of CareVid Tea powder. Each extract was prepared from 20 g of fresh tea powder. The extract solvents were dichloromethane, ethanol, methanol, water, acidified water (0.1 M HCl), and hot water (>90 °C). These crude extracts were screened in the assay at a starting concentration of 50 μg/mL. The extract that demonstrated the strongest inhibitory activity against the reverse transcriptase enzyme was chemically characterised using HPLC–MS (the methanol extract). The major components that were identified were purchased separately and screened against the reverse transcriptase enzyme in a separate assay.

4.2. HPLC–MS Analysis

Metabolic profiling of the methanolic extract was performed by UHPLC–UV–HRMS/MS on a Vanquish UHPLC system (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) coupled to a 100 Hz photodiode array detector (PDA) and an Orbitrap Fusion Tribrid (Thermo Scientific) high-resolution tandem mass spectrometer. Chromatographic separation (5 µL) was performed on a Luna C18 column (150 mm × 3 mm i.d., 3μm, Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA) using a mobile phase gradient of 0:90:10 to 90:0:10 (MeOH (A): water (C): acetonitrile + 1% formic acid (D)) over 60 min. Then, 90% A was held for 10 min and returned to initial conditions over 5 min, at 30 °C (flow rate: 400 μL/min). UV detection was recorded between 210 and 550 nm. Mass spectrometry detection was performed in both positive and negative ionisation modes using the full scan and data-dependent MS2 and MS3 acquisition modes. Total Ion Current (TIC) chromatograms were obtained over the range of 125–1800 m/z using a spray voltage of +3.5 kV and −2.5 kV for the positive and negative ionisation modes, respectively. Four different scan events were recorded for each ionisation mode as follows: (1) Full scan; (2) MS2 of the most intense ion in scan event 1; (3) MS3 of the most intense ion in scan event 2; and (4) MS3 of the second most intense ion in scan event 2. Additional parameters for the mass spectrometer include: full scan resolution, 60,000 FWHM; capillary temperature, 350 °C; ion transfer tube temperature, 325 °C; RF lens (%), 50; automatic gain control (AGC) target, 4.0 × 105 (Full scan) and 1.0 × 104 (MSn); intensity threshold, 1.0 × 104; CID collision energy, 35; activation Q, 0.25; and isolation window (m/z), 4. Nitrogen was used as the drying, nebuliser and fragmentation gas. The identification of compounds was performed by comparing accurate mass values, UV spectra and MS2 and MS3 data with literature information and data available in our in-house library of tandem spectra. This library contains more than 5000 tandem mass spectra of isolated or commercially available natural products, including information from some commercially available databases such as NIST. To confirm peak assignments, the fragmentation patterns of each of the identified metabolites were proposed based on MS2 and MS3 data. Detailed analyses of fragmentation patterns were also used to identify compounds not available in our in-house library. To have an overview of the confidence level achieved in the identification of metabolites, we adopted the four levels of accuracy reported in the Metabolomics Standard Initiative.

4.3. HIV-1 Reverse Transcriptase Inhibition Determination

The HIV-1 reverse transcriptase inhibition assay was conducted in vitro using the EnzChek® Reverse transcriptase assay kit (E-22064) provided by Molecular Probes (Eugene, OR, USA), following the manufacturer’s instructions. Reverse transcriptase was purchased from Promega (Madison, WI, USA) (GoScript™ Reverse Transcriptase: catalogue number A5004) and the enzyme dilution buffer from Thermo Fisher (Waltham, MA, USA) (catalogue number B19). Briefly, the EnzChek® RT kit caters to 1000 assays. Assays were performed in increments of 96 using a 96-well microtiter plate. GoScript™ RT was supplied at a concentration of 160 u/μL, but was diluted to 53.3 u/μL in enzyme dilution buffer and frozen as 10 aliquots in volumes of 150 μL at −80°C. A preliminary run was conducted using titrants of the RT to determine the ideal starting concentration, using a ladder with a starting concentration of 26.7 u/μL. A final enzyme concentration of 1.1 u/μL was used, so frozen stock was diluted to 3.4 u/μL in enzyme dilution buffer as the aliquot concentration to give the final concentration of 1.1 u/μL after the reactants were combined. The assay was initiated by annealing of the template and primer. A volume of 5 μL of the poly(A) ribonucleotide template was combined with 5 μL of oligo d(t)16 primer and allowed to anneal for an hour at room temperature. After annealing, the 10 μL volume of template/primer was diluted by adding 1.99 mL of polymerisation buffer. This final solution was used as the reaction mixture. The reaction was commenced by combining 20 μL of reaction mixture and 30 μL of treatment, and thereafter adding the 10 μL of enzyme at 3.4 u/μL. The treatment is either the diluted tea extract or pure compound. The reaction was completed after 1 h at 25 °C and terminated with the addition of 30 μL of 15 mM EDTA. Results were determined by adding 180 μL of PicoGreen® dsDNA quantitation reagent solution to the wells and allowing 5 min to pass before reading fluorescence intensity, using 480 nm as excitation wavelength and 520 nm for emission wavelength. The results are reported as concentration of treatment to give 50% enzyme inhibition (EC50). Extracts and pure compounds were prepared by dissolving to a concentration of 20 mg/mL in dimethyl sulfoxide and diluting in nuclease free water to double the desired starting concentration. During initial testing, a starting concentration of 50 μg/mL was used, so aliquot concentration was 100 μg/mL to ensure a final concentration of 50 μg/mL. Thereafter, final concentrations of 5–2000 μg/mL were used. All samples and extracts were assayed in triplicate and the averages are provided as results.

4.4. Docking Methodology

The docking studies were performed by using the MOE 2015 software. A first energy minimisation of the compounds was performed by MOE using the MMFF94x forcefield, followed by subsequent energy minimisation using Gaussian 09 at the B3LYP/6-31G(d) level of theory. A crystal structure of Y181C mutant HIV-1 RT in complex with Nevirapine was obtained from the RCSB Protein data bank (PDB ID 1JLB). Before docking, the addition of hydrogen and partial charges were performed on 1JLB. To validate the docking protocol, the ligand was redocked into the binding pocket (RMSD 0.5582). Next, the different inhibitor candidates were docked using the triangle matcher method, scoring by London dG, 30 poses, and refined by the rigid receptor, scoring by GBVI/WSA dG, 5 poses.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ph14101009/s1, Table S1. Compounds tentatively identified in the MeOH extract from carevid.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, W.R., N.J.S. and M.K.L.; methodology, W.R., N.J.S., G.F.P.-G., E.M.-C. and M.K.L.; A.G.; writing—original draft preparation, W.R., M.K.L. and N.J.S.; writing—review and editing, N.J.S. and W.R.; supervision, M.K.L. and A.G.; project administration, M.K.L. and N.J.S.; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

W.R. shows appreciation to the inventor, Paul Kiprono Chepkwony and co-inventors, Mitchell Medina and Maria Medina for allowing her to conduct further research on CareVid to validate the claim of use in Kenya.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Khumalo, G.P.; Sadgrove, N.J.; Van Vuuren, S.F.; Van Wyk, B.E. South Africa′s Best BARK Medicines Prescribed at the Johannesburg Muthi Markets for Skin, Gut, and Lung Infections: MIC’s and Brine Shrimp Lethality. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Haacker, M.; Birungi, C. Poverty as a barrier to antiretroviral therapy access for people living with HIV/AIDS in Kenya. Afr. J. AIDS Res. 2018, 17, 145–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. UNAIDS. Fact Sheet—Latest Global and Regional Statistics on the Status of the AIDS Epidemic. Available online: https://www.unaids.org/en/resources/documents/2021/UNAIDS_FactSheet (accessed on 22 August 2021).
  4. Rege, A.; Dahake, R.; Roy, S.; Chowdhary, A. Screening of Natural Products for Anti-HIV Potential: An In vitro Approach. JOJ Immuno Virol. 2015, 1, 555556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Cherutich, P.; Kim, A.A.; Kellogg, T.A.; Sherr, K.; Waruru, A.; De Cock, K.M.; Rutherford, G.W. Detectable HIV Viral Load in Kenya: Data from a Population-Based Survey. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0154318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Lubinga, S.J.; Kintu, A.; Atuhaire, J.; Asiimwe, S. Concomitant herbal medicine and Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) use among HIV patients in Western Uganda: A cross-sectional analysis of magnitude and patterns of use, associated factors and impact on ART adherence. AIDS Care 2012, 24, 1375–1383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Mamba, P.; Adebayo, S.A.; Tshikalange, T.E. Anti-microbial, anti-Inflammatory and HIV-1 reverse transcriptase activity of selected South African plants used to treat sexually transmitted diseases. Int. J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem. Res. 2016, 8, 1870–1876. [Google Scholar]
  8. Namuddu, B.; Kalyango, J.N.; Karamagi, C.; Mudiope, P.; Sumba, S.; Kalende, H.; Wobudeya, E.; Kigozi, B.K.; Waako, P. Prevalence and factors associated with traditional herbal medicine use among patients on highly active antiretroviral therapy in Uganda. BMC Public Health 2011, 11, 855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Nlooto, M.; Naidoo, P. Clinical relevance and use of traditional, complementary and alternative medicines for the management of HIV infection in local African communities, 1989–2014: A review of selected literature. PULA Botsw. J. Afr. Stud. 2014, 28, 105–116. [Google Scholar]
  10. Mushiwokufa, W. Treating HIV Infection with Herbal Medicine: A Case Report. J. Tradit. Med. Clin. Naturop. 2016, 5, 1000192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Onifade, A.A.; Jewell, A.P.; Ajadi, T.A.; Rahamon, S.K.; Ogunrin, O.O. Effectiveness of a herbal remedy in six HIV patients in Nigeria. J. Herb. Med. 2013, 3, 99–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ndhlala, A.R.; Stafford, G.I.; Finnie, J.F.; van Staden, J. Commercial herbal preparations in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa: The urban face of traditional medicine. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2011, 77, 830–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Chepkwony, P.C.; Medina, M.; Medina, M. Compounds and Compositions for Treating Infection. 20120190734A1, 26 January 2014. [Google Scholar]
  14. Medina, M.; Chepkwony, P.C.; Medina, M. Medicinal and Herbal Composition and Uses Thereof. U.S. Patent 8404284B2, 23 December 2010. [Google Scholar]
  15. Kloos, H.; Mariam, D.H.; Kaba, M.; Tadele, G. Traditional medicine and HIV/AIDS in Ethiopia: Herbal medicine and faith healing: A review. Ethiop. J. Health Dev. 2013, 27, 141–155. [Google Scholar]
  16. Chinsembu, K.C. Chemical diversity and activity profiles of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase inhibitors from plants. Braz. J. Pharm. 2019, 29, 504–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ahn, M.J.; Yoon, K.D.; Min, S.Y.; Lee, J.S.; Kim, J.H.; Kim, T.G.; Kim, S.H.; Kim, N.G.; Huh, H.; Kim, J. Inhibition of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase and protease by phlorotannins from the brown alga Ecklonia cava. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2004, 27, 544–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Figiel, M.; Krepl, M.; Park, S.; Poznanski, J.; Skowronek, K.; Golab, A.; Ha, T.; Sponer, J.; Nowotny, M. Mechanism of polypurine tract primer generation by HIV-1 reverse transcriptase. J. Biol. Chem. 2018, 293, 191–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Sluis-Cremer, N. Future of nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, 637–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Poongavanam, V.; Namasivayam, V.; Vanangamudi, M.; Shamaileh, H.A.; Veedu, R.N.; Kihlberg, J.; Murugan, N.A. Integrative approaches in HIV-1 non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor design. WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 2017, 8, e1328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tian, L.; Kim, M.S.; Li, H.; Wang, J.; Yang, W. Structure of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase cleaving RNA in an RNA/DNA hybrid. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, 507–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Wei, S.D.; Zhou, H.C.; Lin, Y.M. Antioxidant activities of fractions of polymeric procyanidins from stem bark of Acacia confusa. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2011, 12, 1146–1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Al-Nour, M.Y.; Ibrahim, M.M.; Elsaman, T. Ellagic Acid, Kaempferol, and Quercetin from Acacia nilotica: Promising Combined Drug with Multiple Mechanisms of Action. Curr. Pharmacol. Rep. 2019, 5, 255–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Sharma, B.; Yadav, A.; Dabur, R. Interactions of a medicinal climber Tinospora cordifolia with supportive interspecific plants trigger the modulation in its secondary metabolic profiles. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 14327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Tane, P.; Tatsimo, S.; Conolly, J.D. Crotomacrine, a new clerodane diterpene from the fruits of Croton macrostachyus. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 6997–6998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Rasmussen, B.; Nkurunziza, A.-J.; Witt, M.; Oketch-Rabah, H.A.; Jaroszewski, J.W.; Staerk, D. Dovyalicin-type spermidine alkaloids from Dovyalis species. J. Nat. Prod. 2006, 69, 1300–1304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sinan, K.I.; Chiavaroli, A.; Orlando, G.; Bene, K.; Zengin, G.; Cziaky, Z.; Jeko, J.; Mahomoodally, M.F.; Picot-Allain, M.C.N.; Menghini, L.; et al. Biopotential of Bersama abyssinica Fresen Stem Bark Extracts: UHPLC Profiles, Antioxidant, Enzyme Inhibitory, and Antiproliferative Propensities. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Smerdon, S.J.; Jager, J.; Wang, J.; Kohlstaedt, L.A.; Chirino, A.J.; Friedman, J.M.; Rice, P.A.; Steitz, T.A. Structure of the binding site for nonnucleoside inhibitors of the reverse transcriptase of human immunodeficiency virus type 1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1994, 91, 3911–3915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Kohlstaedt, L.A.; Wang, J.; Friedman, J.M.; Rice, P.A.; Steitz, T.A. Crystal structure at 3.5 A resolution of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase complexed with an inhibitor. Science 1992, 256, 1783–1790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Ren, J.; Nichols, C.; Bird, L.; Chamberlain, P.; Weaver, K.; Short, S.; Stuart, D.I.; Stammers, D.K. Structural mechanisms of drug resistance for mutations at codons 181 and 188 in HIV-1 reverse transcriptase and the improved resilience of second generation non-nucleoside inhibitors. J. Mol. Biol. 2001, 312, 795–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Das, K.; Martinez, S.E.; Bauman, J.D.; Arnold, E. HIV-1 reverse transcriptase complex with DNA and nevirapine reveals non-nucleoside inhibition mechanism. Nat. Struct Mol. Biol. 2012, 19, 253–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Hevener, K.E.; Zhao, W.; Ball, D.M.; Babaoglu, K.; Qi, J.; White, S.W.; Lee, R.E. Validation of molecular docking programs for virtual screening against dihydropteroate synthase. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2009, 49, 444–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Rather, L.J.; Shahid-ul-Islam, S.; Mohammad, F. A review of its traditional uses, phytochemistry, and pharmacology. Sustain. Chem. Pharm. 2015, 2, 12–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Barbosa, F.; Hlashwayo, D.; Sevastyanov, V.; Chichava, V.; Mataveia, A.; Boane, E.; Cala, A. Medicinal plants sold for treatment of bacterial and parasitic diseases in humans in Maputo city markets, Mozambique. BMC Complement. Med. Ther. 2020, 20, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Chhabra, S.C.; Mahunnah, R.L.A.; Mshiu, E.N. Plants used in traditional medicine in Eastern Tanzania. V. Angiosperms (Passifloraceae to Sapindaceae). J. Ethnopharmacol. 1991, 33, 143–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Jeruto, P.; Lukhoba, C.; Ouma, G.; Otieno, D.; Mutai, C. An ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants used by the Nandi people in Kenya. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2008, 116, 370–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Kisangau, D.P.; Herrmann, T.M.; Lyaruu, H.V.; Hosea, K.M.; Joseph, C.C.; Mbwambo, Z.H.; Masimba, P.J. Traditional knowledge, use practices and conservation of medicinal plants for HIV/AIDS care in rural Tanzania. Ethnobot. Res. Appl. 2011, 9, 043–057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Kisangau, D.P.; Lyaruu, H.V.; Hosea, K.M.; Joseph, C.C. Use of traditional medicines in the management of HIV/AIDS opportunistic infections in Tanzania: A case in the Bukoba rural district. J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 2007, 3, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Adongo, O. Medicinal Plants of Chuka Community in Tharaka Nithi County, Kenya and Some of Their Selected Essential Elements. Master’s Thesis, Kenyatta University, Kahawa, Kenya, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  40. Madikizela, B.; Ndhlala, A.R.; Finnie, J.F.; Staden, J.V. In vitro antimicrobial activity of extracts from plants used traditionally in South Africa to treat tuberculosis and related symptoms. Evid. Based Complementary Altern. Med. 2013, 2013, 840719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Kidane, B.; van Andel, T.; van der Maesen, L.J.; Asfaw, Z. Use and management of traditional medicinal plants by Maale and Ari ethnic communities in southern Ethiopia. J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 2014, 10, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Al-Taweel, A.M.; El-Deeb, K.S.; Abdel-Kader, M.S.; Mossa, J.S. GC/MS Analysis of the Fatty Acids of Three Clematis species Growing in Saudi Arabia and their Anti-inflammatory activity. Saudi Pharm. J. 2007, 15, 224. [Google Scholar]
  43. Watt, J.M.; Breyer-Brandwijk, M.G. The Medicinal and Poisonous Plants of Southern and Eastern Africa, 2nd ed.; Livingstone: London, UK, 1962. [Google Scholar]
  44. Maroyi, A. Ethnopharmacological Uses, Phytochemistry, and Pharmacological Properties of Croton macrostachyus Hochst. Ex Delile: A Comprehensive Review. Evid. Based Complementary Altern. Med. 2017, 2017, 1694671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Schmelzer, G.H.; Gurib-Fakim, A.; Arroo, R.; Bosch, C.H.; de Ruijter, A.; Simmonds, M.S.J.; Lemmens, R.H.M.J.; Oyen, L.P.A. Plant. Resource of Tropical Africa 11 (1) Medicinal Plants 1; Backhuys Publishers: Leiden, The Netherlands, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  46. Chirchir, K.; Cheplogoi, P.; Omolo, J.; Langat, M.K. Chemical constituents of Solanum mauense (Solanaceae) and Dovyalis abyssinica (Salicaceae). Int. J. Biol. Chem. Sci. 2018, 12, 999–1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Omwoyo, H.N.; Maingi, J.; Kebira, A. The efficacy of some medicinal plants used locally within Transmara west, Narok County, Kenya against selected Enterobacteria and Candida. IOSR J. Pharm. Biol. Sci. 2017, 12, 115–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Mulaudzi, R.; Ndhlala, A.; Kulkarni, M.; Finnie, J.; Van Staden, J. Anti-inflammatory and mutagenic evaluation of medicinal plants used by Venda people against venereal and related diseases. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2013, 146, 173–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Tuasha, N.; Petros, B.; Asfaw, Z. Medicinal plants used by traditional healers to treat malignancies and other human ailments in Dalle District, Sidama Zone, Ethiopia. J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 2018, 14, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. Jeruto, P.; Too, E.; Mwamburi, L.; Amuka, O. An Inventory of Medicinal Plants used to Treat Gynaecological-Obstetric-Urino-Genital Disorders in South Nandi Sub County in Kenya. J. Nat. Sci. Res. 2015, 5, 136–152. [Google Scholar]
  51. Bii, C.C.; Korir, K.; Rugutt, J.; Mutai, C. The potential use of Prunus africana for the control, treatment and management of common fungal and bacterial infections. J. Med. Plants Res. 2010, 4, 995–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Komakech, R.; Kang, Y.; Lee, J.H.; Omujal, F. A Review of the Potential of Phytochemicals from Prunus africana (Hook f.) Kalkman Stem Bark for Chemoprevention and Chemotherapy of Prostate Cancer. Evid. Based Complementary Altern. Med. 2017, 2017, 3014019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Dzoyem, J.P.; Eloff, J.N. Anti-inflammatory, anticholinesterase and antioxidant activity of leaf extracts of twelve plants used traditionally to alleviate pain and inflammation in South Africa. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2015, 160, 194–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Kiringe, J.W. A survey of traditional health remedies used by the Maasai of Southern Kajiado District, Kenya. Ethnobot. Res. Appl. 2006, 4, 61–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Tabuti, J.R.; Kukunda, C.B.; Waako, P.J. Medicinal plants used by traditional medicine practitioners in the treatment of tuberculosis and related ailments in Uganda. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2010, 127, 130–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Sadgrove, N.J.; Jones, G.L. From Petri Dish to Patient: Bioavailability Estimation and Mechanism of Action for Antimicrobial and Immunomodulatory Natural Products. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 2470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Serra, A.; Macia, A.; Romero, M.P.; Valls, J.; Blade, C.; Arola, L.; Motilva, M.J. Bioavailability of procyanidin dimers and trimers and matrix food effects in in vitro and in vivo models. Br. J. Nutr. 2010, 103, 944–952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. González-Sarríasa, A.; García-Villalba, R.; Núñez-Sánchez, M.A.; Tomé-Carneiroa, J.; Zafrilla, P.; Mulero, J.; Tomás-BarberánaJuan, F.A.; Espín, C. Identifying the limits for ellagic acid bioavailability: A crossover pharmacokinetic study in healthy volunteers after consumption of pomegranate extracts. J. Funct. Foods 2015, 19, 225–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Pharmaceuticals 14 01009 g001 550
Figure 1. LC–MS base peak chromatogram (negative ionisation mode) of a MeOH extract of CareVid. For compound identities, refer to Section 2.1 or Table S1 in Supplementary Files.
Figure 1. LC–MS base peak chromatogram (negative ionisation mode) of a MeOH extract of CareVid. For compound identities, refer to Section 2.1 or Table S1 in Supplementary Files.
Pharmaceuticals 14 01009 g001
Pharmaceuticals 14 01009 g002 550
Figure 2. LC–MS base peak chromatogram (positive ionisation mode) of a MeOH extract of CareVid. For compound identities, refer to Section 2.1 or Table S1 in Supplementary Files.
Figure 2. LC–MS base peak chromatogram (positive ionisation mode) of a MeOH extract of CareVid. For compound identities, refer to Section 2.1 or Table S1 in Supplementary Files.
Pharmaceuticals 14 01009 g002
Pharmaceuticals 14 01009 g003 550
Figure 3. Overlay of top scoring ligands crotepoxide 14 (orange) and magnoflorine 13 (pink) with known inhibitor Nevirapine (green) in the non-nucleoside inhibitor binding pocket portion of reverse transcriptase RT (PDB ID 1JLB).
Figure 3. Overlay of top scoring ligands crotepoxide 14 (orange) and magnoflorine 13 (pink) with known inhibitor Nevirapine (green) in the non-nucleoside inhibitor binding pocket portion of reverse transcriptase RT (PDB ID 1JLB).
Pharmaceuticals 14 01009 g003
Pharmaceuticals 14 01009 g004 550
Figure 4. Ligand interactions of top scoring ligands with non-nucleoside inhibitor binding pocket portion of reverse transcriptase RT.
Figure 4. Ligand interactions of top scoring ligands with non-nucleoside inhibitor binding pocket portion of reverse transcriptase RT.
Pharmaceuticals 14 01009 g004
Pharmaceuticals 14 01009 g005 550
Figure 5. Overlay of ellagic acid 10b (yellow) with known inhibitor Nevirapine (green) in the non-nucleoside inhibitor binding pocket portion of reverse transcriptase RT (PDB ID 1JLB) (left) and ligand interactions of 10b with non-nucleoside inhibitor binding pocket of RT (right).
Figure 5. Overlay of ellagic acid 10b (yellow) with known inhibitor Nevirapine (green) in the non-nucleoside inhibitor binding pocket portion of reverse transcriptase RT (PDB ID 1JLB) (left) and ligand interactions of 10b with non-nucleoside inhibitor binding pocket of RT (right).
Pharmaceuticals 14 01009 g005
Table
Table 1. Calculated free energy of binding of ligands docked with RT.
Table 1. Calculated free energy of binding of ligands docked with RT.
Compound NumberTentative IdentityFree Energy of Binding (ΔG) kcal/mol
14Crotepoxide−8.55
13Magnoflorine−8.39
16Pellitorine−6.94
10bEllagic acid−6.80
11Oleuropein−6.36
6Mangiferin−4.47
12Tremulacin−3.74
5bProcyanidin B2−3.52
5aProcyanidin B1−2.60
Table
Table 2. EC50 values for compounds and extracts (treatment group) against the HIV-1 reverse transcription process. A high rating is for values <100 ppm, whereas moderate is 100–1000 ppm. Low activity is above this value. Nil is for no activity detected.
Table 2. EC50 values for compounds and extracts (treatment group) against the HIV-1 reverse transcription process. A high rating is for values <100 ppm, whereas moderate is 100–1000 ppm. Low activity is above this value. Nil is for no activity detected.
TreatmentEC50 ppmRatingTreatmentEC50 ppmRating
DCM>100n.aCatechin1969.2Low
H2O15HighHesperidin624.1Moderate
Hot H2O11.25HighHesperitin4131.7Low
MeOH6.9HighTremulacin539.5Moderate
80% EtOH7.5HighCrotepoxide1368.1Low
Pellitorinen.aNilMangiferinn.aNil
Oleuropeinn.aNilEllagic acid 115.3High
Magnoflorinen.aNilEllagic acid 237.2High
Zidovudine40.1HighProcyanidin B3.2High
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rotich, W.; Sadgrove, N.J.; Mas-Claret, E.; Padilla-González, G.F.; Guantai, A.; Langat, M.K. HIV-1 Reverse Transcriptase Inhibition by Major Compounds in a Kenyan Multi-Herbal Composition (CareVid™): In Vitro and In Silico Contrast. Pharmaceuticals 2021, 14, 1009. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph14101009

AMA Style

Rotich W, Sadgrove NJ, Mas-Claret E, Padilla-González GF, Guantai A, Langat MK. HIV-1 Reverse Transcriptase Inhibition by Major Compounds in a Kenyan Multi-Herbal Composition (CareVid™): In Vitro and In Silico Contrast. Pharmaceuticals. 2021; 14(10):1009. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph14101009

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rotich, Winnie, Nicholas J. Sadgrove, Eduard Mas-Claret, Guillermo F. Padilla-González, Anastasia Guantai, and Moses K. Langat. 2021. "HIV-1 Reverse Transcriptase Inhibition by Major Compounds in a Kenyan Multi-Herbal Composition (CareVid™): In Vitro and In Silico Contrast" Pharmaceuticals 14, no. 10: 1009. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph14101009

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop