Phytochemicals and Amino Acids Profiles of Selected sub-Saharan African Medicinal Plants’ Parts Used for Cardiovascular Diseases’ Treatment

Abstract

For years, the focus on the lipid–atherosclerosis relationship has limited the consideration of the possible contribution of other key dietary components, such as amino acids (AAs), to cardiovascular disease (CVD) development. Notwithstanding, the potential of plant-based diets, some AAs and phytochemicals to reduce CVDs’ risk has been reported. Therefore, in this study, the phytochemical and AA profiles of different medicinal plants’ (MPs) parts used for CVDs’ treatment in sub-Saharan Africa were investigated. Fourier-transform infrared analysis confirmed the presence of hydroxyl, amino and other bioactive compounds’ functional groups in the samples. In most of them, glutamic and aspartic acids were the most abundant AAs, while lysine was the most limiting. P. biglobosa leaf, had the richest total branched-chain AAs (BCAAs) level, followed by A. cepa bulb. However, A. cepa bulb had the highest total AAs content and an encouraging nutraceutical use for adults based on its amino acid score. Principal component analysis revealed no sharp distinction between the AAs composition of MPs that have found food applications and those only used medicinally. Overall, the presence of medicinally important phytochemicals and AAs levels in the selected MPs’ parts support their use for CVDs treatment as they might not add to the AAs (e.g., the BCAAs) burden in the human body.

1. Introduction

Scientific reports have revealed that cardiovascular diseases (CVDs)—a group of heart and blood vessels’ disorders involving pathologic process (usually atherosclerosis)—are the number one global cause of death [1,2,3,4,5,6]. These diseases, which include coronary artery disease, coronary heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, rheumatic heart disease, heart failure, stroke [2,3,5,6,7,8] and other conditions with diabetes mellitus, high blood pressure, hyperlipidemia, obesity, physical inactivity, smoking, increased age and family history as some of the risk factors [1,9], claim the lives of approximately 17.9 million people annually [6]. Myocardial infarction (heart attack), one of the manifestations of CVDs [1], occurs after prolonged ischemia (reduced blood flow) of the coronary arteries [10].

As most of the deaths arising from CVDs are in low- and middle-income countries [5], traditional medicine, involving the application of medicinal plants (MPs), has been used for treatment. This can be attributed to the inadequate primary health care systems, limited access to modern health services [11,12,13,14] and unavailability/high cost of modern medicine [12,14,15] in some of these countries. The WHO [16] described herbal medicine to include herbs, herbal materials, herbal preparations and finished herbal products that have parts of plants, other plant materials, or combinations as active ingredients.

Meanwhile, atherosclerosis development has been indicated as the primary cause of CVDs [5] in which cholesterol deposits within the artery; triglycerides and their chief components, fatty acids, are contributing factors. The attention on the lipid–atherosclerosis relationship has, however, led to less consideration of the possible contribution of other key dietary components, such as amino acids (AAs), to atherogenesis and CVDs’ development [5]. Among the >300 of these AAs occurring in nature, 20 serve as building blocks of protein [17]. The essential AAs (EAAs), or indispensable AAs [18], are those whose carbon skeletons cannot be synthesized or are inadequately synthesized de novo by the body based on their needs and must be obtained from the diet to satisfy optimal requirements, while the non-essential AAs (NEAAs) are those that can be synthesized de novo by the body in required sufficient amounts [17]. Functional AAs, which include arginine, cysteine, glutamine, leucine, proline and tryptophan, help in the regulation of important metabolic pathways needed for maintenance, growth, reproduction and immunity [17].

The branched-chain AAs (BCAAs) comprising isoleucine (Ile), leucine (Leu) and valine (Val) are a sub-group of EAAs in humans [19,20,21]. Similar to other EAAs, they are mainly obtained via dietary protein intake [20] with rich levels found in meat, fish, dairy products and eggs [21]. Nevertheless, McDougall [22] pointed out the possibility of the consumption of animal protein contributing to some human health-related problems such as heart disease, diabetes and obesity, among others. Olsen et al. [23] also reported that studies have related a high regular intake of animal protein with increased adiposity, whereas the prevention of CVDs and some of their risk factors has been linked with plant-based diets.

Broadly, BCAAs are important for normal growth/function at the cellular and organ levels [5,24] with vital mediation effects on protein synthesis, glucose homeostasis, anti-obesity as well as nutrient-sensitive signaling pathways [25]. Despite these, their accumulation and that of related metabolites may bring about negative effects [19]. For instance, they have been linked with several cardiometabolic risk factors such as high blood pressure and dyslipidemia [26]. White and Newgard [21] reported that a chronic rise in BCAAs is observed in blood from individuals with obesity-associated conditions such as insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes and CVDs. In addition to BCAAs, Ntzouvani et al. [27] revealed that aromatic AAs (ArAAs), particularly phenylalanine (an EAA) and tyrosine (a NEEA), have also been associated with cardiometabolic risk. Other potential atherogenic AAs that have been indicated include glutamate, glutamine, methionine (with its metabolic intermediate) and homocysteine [5].

On the other hand, phytochemicals, also referred to as phytonutrients [28], are natural bioactive compounds in plants with human health benefits of preventing and reducing the risk of chronic diseases such as CVDs [29,30,31,32,33,34]. According to Geetha et al. [31] and Patle et al. [35], they are classified into two categories, namely, primary and secondary metabolites in which the former include proteins, while their general profiling can be carried out using Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. FTIR spectroscopy has been indicated as a fast, versatile, cheap, non-destructive and effective analytical technique for carrying out chemical constituents analysis of biological materials [35,36,37,38], including plant matrices [39]. It aids the detection, characterization and identification of the key functional groups and chemical bonds of bioactive compounds present in the sample [31,38].

As infrared (IR) spectrometry helps in herbal analysis [36], and dietary intake, among other factors, may contribute to the elevation of BCAAs in circulation [19], this research was aimed at assessing the phytochemicals profile and principally the distribution of AAs (including BCAAs and ArAAs) in eight MPs’ parts used for the treatment of CVDs as well as their associated risk factors in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). This becomes necessary as (1) plants contain phytochemicals in addition to essential nutrients [29]; (2) the association of several AAs such as BCAAs, phenylalanine, tyrosine, glutamate, glutamine, methionine and homocysteine with atherosclerosis development, CVDs risk and related cardio-metabolic disorders has been reported [5,19,21,26]; (3) different plants’ parts of some spices and vegetables with food applications are used as/with other MPs in SSA for CVDs’ treatment; (4) non-animal protein is noted to be more effective than animal protein in reducing blood pressure [40]; (5) a diet rich in plant-based proteins has been recommended by nutritionists and relevant agencies [41] and (6) the potential of some AAs such as arginine, glutamine, glycine, leucine and taurine [5,27,42] to reduce atherogenic effects/CVDs risk has been indicated.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Collection and Preparation of Samples

Based on the literature, different plants’ parts of eight MPs used for CVDs and related risk factors’ treatment in SSA, some of which have found food applications, were investigated. These MPs’ parts were purchased at Odopetu market, Akure, Ondo State, Nigeria, with identification and authentication at the Department of Crop, Soil and Pest Technology, The Federal University of Technology, Akure, Ondo State, Nigeria. Details of the selected MPs and additional information regarding their key bioactive compounds are provided in

Table 1. Details of the selected sub-Saharan African medicinal plants.

S/N	Medicinal Plants	Family	English Name	Plant’s Part Used in the Current Study	Ailments Used for	Countries in SSA Where Use Has Been Reported	References
Studied part with medicinal food plant applications
1	Allium cepa	Amaryllidaceae	Onion	Bulb	Cardiovascular disease, Diabetes, High cholesterol level, Hypertension	Benin, Burkina Faso Cameroon, DR Congo Eritrea, Ethiopia Gabon, Mauritius, Nigeria, Sudan, Togo	[43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59]
2	Syzgium aromaticum L.	Myrtaceae	Clove bud/Clove	Flower	Diabetes, Hypertension	Nigeria	[47,51,60]
3	Tetrapleura tetraptera	Fabaceae	Ring worm bush	Fruit	Cardiovascular activities, Diabetes, Hypertension	Benin, Cameroon Gabon, Ghana, Nigeria	[43,51,53,58,60,61,62]
4	Zingiber officinale	Zingiberaceae	Ginger	Rhizome	Diabetes, High cholesterol level, Hypertension	Benin, Eritrea, Gabon, Mauritius, Nigeria	[43,47,51,57,58,59,63,64]
Studied part used solely for medicinal applications
5	Aristolochia ringens Vahl.	Aristochiaceae	Pelican flower	Root	Diabetes, Heart attack	Nigeria	[48,51,60]
6	Mangifera indica L.	Anacardiaceae	Mango	Bark	Diabetes, Hypertension	Benin, Cameroon, DR Congo, Eritrea, Gabon, Ghana, Guinea, Kenya, Mauritius, Nigeria, Togo, Zambia, Zimbabwe	[43,47,51,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72]
7	Parkia biglobosa Benth.	Fabaceae	African locust bean	Leaf	Diabetes, Hypertension, Heart disorders	Benin, Burkina Faso, Cote d’Ivoire, Ghana, Nigeria, Togo	[47,50,51,52,61,66,70,73,74,75,76]
8	Picralima nitida	Apocynaceae	Picralima	Seed	Cardiovascular diseases, Diabetes, Hypertension	Benin, Gabon, Ghana Nigeria, Togo	[43,50,51,58,60,61,70,77,78]

and

Table 2. Key bioactive compounds in the selected sub-Saharan African medicinal plants based on the literature.

S/N	Medicinal Plants	Key Bioactive Compounds	Chemical Structure	Influence on Cardiovascular Diseases and Their Risk Factors	References
1	Allium cepa	Flavonoids (particularly flavonols), frutooligosaccharides and sulfur compounds. Characterized for its flavonol quercetin and quercetin derivates.	Quercetin	Inhibit platelet aggregation. Reduce serum triglycerides and cholesterol levels. Alleviate hyperglycemia.	[79,80,81,82,83]
2	Syzgium aromaticum L.	Eugenol	Eugenol: 4-allyl-2-methoxyphenol	Inhibits platelet aggregation. Reduce serum triglycerides and cholesterol levels.	[84,85,86,87,88]
3	Tetrapleura tetraptera	Saponin triterpenes, a triterpene glycoside (aridanin) and a coumarin (scopoletin).	Aridanin (an N-acetylglycoside of oleanolic acid)	Lowers blood glucose level.	[89,90,91,92,93,94]
4	Zingiber officinale	Terpenes: β-Bisabolene, α-Curcumene, Zingiberene, α-Farnesene and β-Sesquiphellandrene. Phenolic compounds: Gingerols (e.g., 6-gingerol), Shogaols (e.g., 6-shogaol) and Paradols (e.g., 6-paradol)	6-Gingerol: Often used as an indicator of ginger quality	Inhibits platelet aggregation. Reduce the levels of blood lipids and blood pressure.	[95,96,97,98]
5	Aristolochia ringens Vahl.	Dianoside G, Trilobine, Asiatic acid, Magnoflorine, Quercetin 3-O-glucuronide and Strictosidine.	Quercetin 3-O-glucuronide (A flavonol glucuronide)	Reduce blood glucose level.	[99,100]
6	Mangifera indica L.	Gallotanins, Gallic acid and its derivatives, Mangiferin, Flavonoids, Catechin and Phenolic acids	Mangiferin (2-β-D-glucopyranosyl-1, 3, 6, 7-tetrahydroxyxanthone): Major component in mango stem bark extract	Reduce serum total cholesterol level and glucose absorption.	[101,102,103,104,105]
7	Parkia biglobosa Benth.	Flavonoids (catechin, epigallocatechin, epigallocatechin gallate, quercetin, rutin and kaempferol) and Phenolic acids (gallic, chlorogenic and caffeic acids)	Catechin: A flavanol	Serum cholesterol lowering activity	[106,107,108,109]
8	Picralima nitida	Indole Alkaloids: akuammine, akuammidine, akuammicine, akuammigine and pseudoakuammigine	Akuammine: Most abundant alkaloid in the seed	Reduce glycaemia	[110,111]

, respectively.

After collection, the selected samples were washed, dried and ground to a powder with the use of a Binatone grinder (BLG 450) or a hammer mill (Changzhou, China) as appropriate. The powdered samples were then stored at −20 °C prior to FTIR and AAs analyses.

2.2. FTIR Spectroscopy Analysis

For the FTIR analysis, dried powdered samples of each of the selected MPs’ parts were loaded directly onto the FTIR spectroscope [112] and the spectra recorded in the middle infrared (MIR) region of 4000 cm⁻¹ and 650 cm⁻¹ [113]. PerkinElmer Spectrum 100 FTIR spectrometer was used for this purpose with a universal ATR sampling accessory. Scanning was performed at room temperature (25 ± 2 °C), while the background spectra collected under the same experimental conditions were subtracted from the sample spectra.

2.3. Determination of Crude Protein Content

The micro-Kjeldahl method [114] was used in determining the nitrogen content of the MPs’ parts powdered samples. With respect to Salo-väänänen and Koivistoinen [115] who noted the possibility of overestimating the true protein content of foods and other biological materials using a default conversion factor, the average nitrogen-to-protein conversion factor of 4.40 provided by Mariotti et al. [116] for vegetables, mushrooms and leaf proteins was used in converting the percentage nitrogen to crude protein.

2.4. Determination of Amino Acids Profile

The method as described by Adeyeye [117] with slight modifications was used in determining the AAs profile, except for tryptophan, of the selected MPs’ parts powdered samples. This involved defatting of the dried samples (about 2.0 g) using a Soxhlet apparatus with chloroform/ethanol mixture at a ratio of 2:1. Thereafter, hydrolysis of the defatted samples, involving seven milliliters of 6 M hydrochloric acid, was carried out, followed by evaporation of the filtrate to dryness in a rotary evaporator. Each residue of the MPs’ parts samples was then dissolved with 5 mL of acetate buffer (pH 2.0) and cool stored in a plastic specimen bottle at −20 °C.

For tryptophan determination, the method provided by Yust et al. [118] and Oriolowo et al. [119], involving alkaline hydrolysis with 4.2 M sodium hydroxide as well as neutralization of the hydrolysates to pH 7, was employed. Quantitative analysis of the amino acids in the hydolysates was achieved via the use of Applied Biosystems PTH Amino Acid Analyzer (Applied Biosystems Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) equipped with 2.1 mm ID × 220 mm cartridge columns packed with a reverse-phase support (PTH-C18). Norleucine was used as the internal standard.

2.5. Quantification and Estimation of Protein Quality

From the results obtained, the total AAs (TAAs), total EAAs (TEAAs), total NEAAs (TNEAAs), total acidic AAs (TAAAs) comprising glutamic and aspartic acids [117], total basic AAs (TBAAs) involving lysine, arginine and histidine [120], total neutral AAs (TNAAs) calculated as TAAs—(TAAAs + TBAAs), total sulfur AAs (TSAAs) from methionine and cysteine levels [18], percentage cysteine in TSAAs, total aromatic AAs (TArAAs) based on phenylalanine and tyrosine contents [18], as well as their percentages, were estimated. In addition, the percentages and ratio of TEAAs/TNEAAs [121,122], total BCAAs (TBCAAs), leucine to isoleucine (Leu/Ile) ratio [114], percentage of bitter AAs from the sum of leucine, valine, histidine, isoleucine, phenylalanine, methionine and tryptophan [123], savory (umami) amino AAs—glutamic and aspartic acids [122,123], sweet (threonine, serine, glycine and alanine) AAs [123] and the most limiting AAs were evaluated.

One of the equations of Alsmeyer and other researchers employed by Adeyeye et al. [114] and Kowalczewski et al. [124] (see Equation (1) below) was used in determining the predicted protein efficiency ratio (P-PER) of the MPs’ parts based on their AAs composition.

i.e., P-PER = −0.468 + 0.454 (Leu) − 0.105 (Tyr)

(1)

In contrast, the slightly modified procedure of Tan et al. [123], involving the application of Equation (2), was followed for the amino acid scores’ (AAS) determination. For this, the FAO [125] recommended amino acid scoring patterns for young children (6 months to 3 years) as well as those for older children, adolescents and adults were also employed. The AAS were expressed as a ratio to unity, rather than in percentage, as recommended by the FAO/WHO [126].

$$\mathrm{Amino}\mathrm{acid}\mathrm{score},\mathrm{AAS}=\frac{\mathrm{concentration}\mathrm{of}\mathrm{amino}\mathrm{acid}\left(\frac{\mathrm{mg}}{\mathrm{g}}\right)\mathrm{in}\mathrm{the}\mathrm{medicinal}\mathrm{plants}{}^{’}\mathrm{parts}}{\mathrm{scoring}\mathrm{pattern}\left(\frac{\mathrm{mg}}{\mathrm{g}}\right)\mathrm{protein}\mathrm{requirement}}$$

(2)

2.6. Statistical Analyses

The AAs, including EAAs, NEAAs, BCAAs and ArAAs, content of eight SSA MPs’ parts used for CVDs’ and related risk factors’ treatment were assessed with their AAS. One-way Analysis of Variance (SPSS^®, version 26, IBM Statistics for Windows, New York, NY, USA) of the results obtained at 95% confidence level with Tukey’s post-hoc test was carried out. A readily available web tool for visualizing clustering of multivariate data, ClustVis (https://biit.cs.ut.ee/clustvis (accessed on 3 March 2021) [127]), was used for generating the heatmap, while principal component analysis was achieved by means of JMP^® Statistical Discovery^TM software, version 14 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. FTIR Analysis

Results of the FTIR analysis showing the different functional groups of the metabolites present in the assessed MPs’ parts are illustrated in Figure 1 and Figure 2, while details of the absorption bands and wave number of the dominant peaks in the functional group region are provided in

Table 3. Major absorption bands observed in the functional group region of the selected medicinal plants’ parts’ FTIR spectra.

Medicinal Plants	Absorption Peak (cm−1) (Vibration Type)	Functional Group Assignment
Studied part with medicinal food plant applications
A. cepa	1547.59 (N-O bend); 1623.79 (N-H bend); 2852.11 (C-H stretch); 2920.24 (C-H stretch); 3273.70 (O-H stretch)	Nitro compound; Primary amine; Alkyl group; Alkyl group; Alcohol
S. aromaticum	1512.25 (N-O bend); 1607.42 (C=C bend); 1637.28 (N-H bend); 1731.54 (C=O bend); 2853.17 (C-H stretch); 2925.13 (C-H stretch); 3004.02 (C-H stretch); 3078.29 (N-H stretch); 3384.16 (O-H stretch)	Nitro compound; Diene; Primary amine; Aldehyde; Alkyl group; Alkyl group; Alkyl group; Secondary amine; Alcohol
T. tetraptera	1623.75 (C=C bend); 2854.79 (C-H stretch); 2924.86 (C-H stretch); 299.24 (C-H stretch); 3273.37 (O-H stretch); 3310.40 (O-H stretch); 3405.13 (O-H stretch)	Diene; Alkyl group; Alkyl group; Vinyl group; Alcohol; Alcohol; Alcohol
Z. officinale	1553.06 (C=O bend); 1640.08 (N-H bend); 2926.48 (C-H stretch); 3276.83 (O-H stretch)	Carboxylic acid/derivative; Primary amine; Alkyl group; Alcohol
Studied part used solely for medicinal applications
A. ringens	1627.92 (N-H bend); 2853.37 (C-H stretch); 2885.68 (C-H stretch); 2926.30 (C-H stretch); 3251.78 (O-H stretch); 3312.25 (O-H stretch)	Primary amine; Alkyl group; Alkyl group; Alkyl group; Alcohol; Alcohol
M. indica	1510.35 (N-O bend); 1611.55 (N-H bend); 2922.77 (C-H stretch); 3303.05 (O-H stretch)	Nitro compound; Primary amine; Alkyl group; Alcohol
P. biglobosa	1540.32 (N-O bend); 1611.77 (N-H bend); 1729.74 (C=O bend); 2849.23 (C-H stretch); 2917.09 (C-H stretch); 3280.68 (O-H stretch)	Nitro compound; Primary amine; Aldehyde; Alkyl group; Alkyl group; Alcohol
P. nitida	1647.63 (C=C bend); 2853.82 (C-H stretch); 2922.75 (C-H stretch); 3276.53 (O-H stretch)	Alkene; Alkyl group; Alkyl group; Alcohol

. FTIR spectra of the samples established the presence of different bioactive functional groups such as -NH₂, NH, as well as -OH, -NO₂ and -CHO, among others, in the phytochemicals of these MPs’ parts. Similar to a study by Poojary et al. [128], they all showed the presence of a broad peak for hydrogen bonded -OH stretching in the diagnostic region, which is also seen in all the chemical structures in Table 2.

The presence of a hydroxyl (-OH) functional group is a fundamental part of most of the phenolic phytochemicals such as flavonoids and tannins [128] and would have contributed to the reported antioxidants as well as antidiabetic properties [35] of these MPs’ parts. Generally, the recorded functional groups, such as the nitro compound, alkyl group, alcohol, diene, aldehyde, vinyl group, carboxylic acid/derivative, alkene, primary and secondary amines in the assessed MPs’ parts, confirm the presence of secondary metabolites such as alkaloids, flavonoids, tannins and polyphenols [31,128], which explains their use in traditional medicine in different parts of SSA. For instance, Geetha et al. [31] linked the consumption of diets rich in polyphenols with protection against the development of diabetes, CVDs and some other diseases.

3.2. Crude Protein Content and Amino Acids Profile

Protein is required for growth and other functions of the body [122], while Odukoya [29] identified plants as the chief source of proteins consumed by humans. Outcome of the statistical analysis revealed that out of the eight investigated MPs’ plants, the bulb of A. cepa, which has been used as a food, spice and medicinal plant [82,129] for hyperlipidemia and CVD prevention [130], had the significantly highest (p < 0.05) crude protein content (10.95 g/100 g), while M. indica bark had the least (3.16 g/100 g) (Figure 3). In line with Odukoya et al. [131], this suggests that A. cepa bulb may have the highest concentration of EAAs among the studied MPs’ parts. Notwithstanding, the relatively low protein content of the A. cepa bulb when compared to other food sources agrees with Odukoya [29], who pointed out that vegetables have low protein contents.

Amino Acids

Results of the AA composition of the selected MPs’ parts that aid the assessment of their quality/value [132] are shown in

Table 4. Essential amino acids profile (mg/g crude protein) of the selected medicinal plants’ parts.

Medicinal Plants	His	Ile	Leu	Lys	Met	Phe	Thr	Try	Val
Studied Part with Medicinal Food Plant Applications
A. cepa	28.10 a ± 0.00	40.80 a ± 0.50	74.40 a ± 0.30	56.60 a ± 0.10	13.70 b ± 0.20	44.30 a ± 0.00	34.70 a,b ± 2.35	9.70 a,b ± 0.30	43.50 b ± 0.20
S. aromaticum	22.35 b,c ± 0.65	31.60 c ± 0.50	60.45 b ± 1.45	31.00 c ± 0.30	16.65 a ± 0.45	40.35 b ± 0.45	30.80 a,b ± 0.80	8.00 b,c ± 0.10	35.50 c,d ± 0.50
T. tetraptera	18.70 d ± 0.50	34.35 b ± 0.35	37.60 e ± 0.90	26.10 c ± 0.10	10.70 c ± 0.50	33.25 d ± 0.45	25.20 b ± 0.80	6.95 c,d ± 0.15	31.70 e ± 0.20
Z. officinale	6.25 f ± 0.15	10.65 e ± 0.15	43.50 d ± 0.30	14.55 d,e ± 0.25	4.95 e ± 0.15	22.60 e ± 0.40	23.05 b ± 0.25	5.90 d,e ± 0.10	18.10 f ± 0.00
Studied Part Used Solely for Medicinal Applications
A. ringens	20.75 c ± 0.35	30.60 c ± 0.50	37.95 e ± 0.55	21.48 c,d ± 2.42	8.55 d ± 0.55	37.65 c ± 0.45	28.85 b ± 0.55	10.25 a ± 0.25	33.75 d ± 0.15
M. indica	9.05 e ± 0.15	7.05 f ± 0.15	23.35 f ± 0.55	11.35 e ± 0.25	5.05 e ± 0.25	13.75 f ± 0.45	52.60 a ± 2.33	5.00 e ± 0.80	14.30 g ± 0.30
P. biglobosa	23.30 b ± 0.30	39.75 a ± 0.15	72.10 a ± 0.30	45.75 b ± 0.65	12.15 b,c ± 0.15	42.15 a,b ± 0.45	27.75 b ± 2.23	8.50 a,b,c ± 0.10	52.60 a ± 0.60
P. nitida	18.20 d ± 0.30	28.50 d ± 0.30	55.40 c ± 0.60	31.00 c ± 0.80	11.50 c ± 0.30	34.15 d ± 0.45	26.95 b ± 0.85	10.25 a ± 0.25	36.00 c ± 0.00

Values represent mean ± standard error. Means followed by different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05) according to Tukey’s post-hoc test. His = histidine; Ile = isoleucine; Leu = leucine; Lys = lysine; Met = methionine; Phe = phenylalanine; Thr = threonine; Try = tryptophan; Val = valine.

(for EAAs) and

Table 5. Non-essential amino acids profile (mg/g crude protein) of the selected medicinal plants’ parts.

Medicinal Plants	Ala	Asp	Arg	Cys	Glu	Gly	Pro	Ser	Tyr
Studied Part with Medicinal Food Plant Applications
A. cepa	40.20 b,c ± 0.00	92.79 a ± 1.68	51.60 a ± 0.00	9.40 b ± 0.30	136.25 a ± 2.52	33.50 a ± 1.70	38.60 a,b ± 0.00	35.15 a ± 2.15	34.40 a ± 0.00
S. aromaticum	37.15 c,d ± 0.75	77.70 a,b ± 0.80	46.85 b ± 0.45	8.20 b,c ± 0.30	132.85 a ± 0.35	35.15 a ± 0.95	30.50 c ± 0.00	35.65 a ± 0.55	33.55 a,b ± 0.85
T. tetraptera	30.70 e ± 0.40	53.05 c ± 0.95	36.55 d ± 0.45	6.40 d ± 0.30	64.75 c ± 1.15	30.90 a ± 0.70	28.90 c,d ± 0.50	30.65 a,b ± 0.45	9.45 e ± 0.85
Z. officinale	13.45 g ± 0.15	34.40 d ± 0.30	21.50 f ± 0.90	7.30 c,d ± 0.00	41.65 c,d ± 0.75	12.55 b ± 0.25	10.70 e ± 0.50	8.90 c ± 0.30	13.75 d,e ± 0.05
Studied Part Used Solely for Medicinal Applications
A. ringens	36.20 d ± 0.20	65.40 b,c ± 0.30	42.15 c ± 0.85	9.40 b ± 0.30	112.00 a,b ± 0.00	36.55 a ± 0.45	27.40 d ± 1.00	30.95 a,b ± 0.15	24.95 b,c ± 0.85
M. indica	22.80 f ± 0.00	24.35 d ± 3.55	30.95 e ± 0.85	11.25 a ± 0.25	34.45 d ± 0.35	12.15 b ± 0.25	3.58 f ± 0.53	3.65 c ± 0.45	6.90 e ± 0.00
P. biglobosa	43.20 a,b ± 0.00	69.39 b,c ± 2.15	50.45 a ± 0.45	11.80 a ± 0.30	90.73 b ± 3.38	30.93 a ± 1.82	36.55 b ± 0.05	22.80 b ± 2.10	32.05 a,b ± 1.05
P. nitida	44.75 a ± 1.55	64.50 b,c ± 0.60	39.60 c,d ± 0.00	9.40 b ± 0.30	95.00 b ± 1.10	32.55 a ± 0.45	40.10 a ± 0.50	34.00 a ± 0.00	21.40 c,d ± 2.05

Values represent mean ± standard error. Means followed by different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05) according to Tukey’s post-hoc test. Ala = alanine; Asp = aspartic acid; Arg = arginine; Cys = cysteine; Glu = glutmamic acid; Gly = glycine; Pro = proline; Ser = serine; Tyr = tyrosine.

(for NEAAs). For the EAAs, A. cepa was found to have the significantly (p < 0.05) highest concentration of histidine, lysine and phenylalanine (Table 4). The bulb of this MP, i.e., A. cepa and P. biglobosa leaf (solely used for medicinal purpose), also recorded the highest level of isoleucine and leucine. S. aromaticum flower, M. indica bark and P. biglobosa leaf had the highest methionine, threonine and valine contents, respectively, while the greatest amount of tryptophan was in A. ringens root and P. nitida seed.

Two MPs—A. cepa (aspartic acid and tyrosine) as well as P. nitida (alanine and proline)—singly had the highest concentration of two of the NEAAs. In contrast, the greatest amount of arginine (A. cepa and P. biglobosa), cysteine (M. indica and P. biglobosa) and glutamic acid (A. cepa and S. aromaticum) was found in two of the studied MPs. The significantly highest level of serine (p < 0.05) was recorded in A. cepa, S. aromaticum and P. nitida, while Z. officinale and M. indica had the lowest glycine contents. A relatively high value of arginine, which is reported to be vital for children [117], was noted in A. cepa.

The results of the analyses are in agreement with a study by Poggiogalle et al. [133], where vegetable proteins were reported to be rich sources of glutamic acid. They are also in line with Olsen et al. [23], who pointed out that plants are poor sources of the sulfur AAs, methionine and cysteine. With respect to Ntuli [134], the significantly highest concentration of hydrophilic AAs (histidine, lysine and tyrosine) and the relatively high concentration of cysteine in A. cepa, in a way, explains the semi-succulence and soft-textured nature of the bulb [134]. As reported by this author, i.e., Ntuli [134], the presence of cysteine and tyrosine (an ArAA) in A. cepa will contribute to its antioxidant activities when found in certain peptides chains.

Generally, as seen in the heatmap (Figure 4), glutamic acid and aspartic acid were the most abundant AAs in most of the tested MPs’ parts. Although they are both NEAAs (Table 5), glutamic acid is vital for optimal organ functioning [135]. The research outcome is consistent with a study by Fredotovic et al. [136], where glutamic acid was the second most abundant AA in A. cepa, and that by Neves et al. [137], where it was reported that these two NEAAs (glutamic acid and aspartic acid) were the most common AAs in the examined jambu (Acmella oleracea) and several vegetables. They were also the most abundant AAs in the two accessions of Amaranthus cruentus seeds flour examined by Esan et al. [138] as well as fish samples studied by Adeyeye et al. [117]. The two NEAAs impart acidic characteristics to proteins [134], act as a neurotransmitter as well as contribute to energy production, transamination, insulin regulation and the formation of other AAs [137]. Lopez et al. [139] indicated their importance in the food industry based on their respective role in hormonal regulation and immunological stimulation. Glutamic acid is also reported to be the key “umami” substrate underlying the unique taste of A. cepa [136].

As clearly observed in the heatmap (Figure 4), leucine was the most abundant AA in Z. officinale rhizome, which contributes to the imbalance of its Leu/Ile ratio discussed in Section 3.3.

3.3. Protein Quality

According to Elhardallou et al. [140] and Sun et al. [141], the quality of proteins depends on their AA composition and proportion. Among the tested MPs’ parts, A. cepa bulb had the significantly highest level (p < 0.05) of TAAs, TNEAAs, TNAAs, TAAAs and TBAAs; the greatest amounts of TEAAs (with or without histidine) and P-PER were also recorded in this MP (A. cepa bulb) as well as P. biglobosa leaf (

Table 6. Concentration (mg/g crude protein), percentage and ratio of specific groups of amino acids in the selected medicinal plants’ parts.

Groups of Amino Acids	Studied Part with Medicinal Food Plant Applications				Studied Part Used Solely for Medicinal Applications
	A. cepa	S. aromaticum	T. tetraptera	Z. officinale	A. ringens	M. indica	P. biglobosa	P. nitida
Total amino acids (TAAs)	817.69 a ± 6.01	714.30 b ± 0.20	515.90 d ± 2.10	313.75 e ± 1.15	614.83 c ± 6.78	291.58 e ± 7.23	711.94 b ± 9.33	633.25 c ± 6.95
Total essential amino acids (TEAAs)
-With Histidine	345.80 a ± 5.30	276.70 b ± 0.70	224.55 d ± 1.85	149.55 e ± 0.35	229.83 c,d ± 4.28	141.50 e ± 9.10	324.05 a ± 5.45	251.95 b,c ± 1.55
-No Histidine	317.70 a ± 5.30	254.35 b ± 0.05	205.85 d ± 1.35	143.30 e ± 0.20	209.08 c,d ± 4.63	132.45 e ± 8.95	300.75 a ± 5.75	233.75 b,c ± 1.85
TEAAs (%)
-With Histidine	42.29 c,d,e ± 0.28	38.74 e,f ± 0.09	43.53 b,c,d ± 0.18	47.67 a,b ± 0.06	37.38 f ± 0.28	48.48 a ± 1.92	45.56 a,b,c ± 1.03	39.79 d,e,f ± 0.19
-No Histidine	38.86 b,c ± 0.21	35.61 c,d ± 0.00	39.90 b,c ± 0.09	45.67 a ± 0.10	34.00 d ± 0.38	45.38 a ± 1.95	42.28 a,b ± 0.85	36.91 c,d ± 0.11
Total non-essential amino acids (TNEAAs)	471.89 a ± 4.25	437.60 a,b ± 0.50	291.35 d ± 0.25	164.20 e ± 0.80	385.00 b,c ± 2.50	150.08 e ± 1.88	387.89 b,c ± 7.51	381.30 c ± 5.40
TNEAAs (%)	57.70 b,c,d ± 0.28	61.26 a,b ± 0.09	56.47 c,d,e ± 0.18	52.33 e,f ± 0.06	62.62 a ± 0.28	51.52 f ± 1.92	54.44 d,e,f ± 1.03	60.21 a,b,c ± 0.19
Ratio of TEAAs to TNEAAs
-With Histidine	0.73 c,d,e ± 0.01	0.63 d,e ± 0.00	0.77 b,c,d ± 0.01	0.91 a,b ± 0.00	0.59 e ± 0.01	0.94 a ± 0.07	0.84 a,b,c ± 0.03	0.66 d,e ± 0.01
-No Histidine	0.67 b,c,d ± 0.01	0.58 c,d ± 0.00	0.71 b,c ± 0.00	0.87 a ± 0.00	0.54 d ± 0.01	0.88 a ± 0.07	0.78 a,b ± 0.03	0.61 c,d ± 0.00
Total branched-chain amino acids (TBCAAs)	158.70 b ± 0.60	127.55 c ± 1.45	103.65 e ± 1.45	72.25 f ± 0.15	102.30 e ± 0.20	44.70 g ± 0.70	164.45 a ± 0.15	119.90 d ± 0.30
TBCAAs (%)	19.42 b ± 0.35	17.86 b,c ± 0.21	20.09 b ± 0.19	23.03 a ± 0.04	16.64 c,d ± 0.15	15.35 d ± 0.62	23.13 a ± 0.89	18.94 b,c ± 0.26
Total neutral amino acids (TNAAs)	452.35 a ± 5.55	403.55 b,c ± 0.55	316.75 e ± 1.45	195.40 f ± 0.60	353.05 d ± 1.75	181.43 f ± 9.18	432.33 a,b ± 3.84	384.95 c,d ± 6.95
TNAAs (%)	55.33 c ± 0.54	56.49 c ± 0.06	61.39 a ± 0.03	62.28 a ± 0.04	57.43 b,c ± 0.35	62.18 a ± 1.61	60.76 a,b ± 0.77	60.79 a,b ± 0.43
Total acidic amino acids (TAAAs)	229.04 a ± 4.19	210.55 a,b ± 1.15	117.80 d,e ± 0.20	76.05 e,f ± 1.05	177.40 b,c ± 0.30	58.80 f ± 3.20	160.12 c ± 5.52	159.50 c,d ± 0.50
TAAAs (%)	27.99 a,b ± 0.92	29.48 a ± 0.17	22.83 c,d ± 0.13	24.24 b,c,d ± 0.25	28.86 a,b ± 0.37	20.21 d ± 1.59	22.43 c,d ± 1.44	25.19 a,b,c ± 0.36
Total basic amino acids (TBAAs)	136.30 a ± 0.10	100.20 c ± 0.80	81.35 d ± 0.85	42.30 e ± 0.50	84.38 d ± 5.33	51.35 e ± 1.25	119.50 b ± 0.10	88.80 d ± 0.50
TBAAs (%)	16.68 a ± 0.38	14.03 b,c ± 0.11	15.77 a,b ± 0.10	13.48 c ± 0.21	13.72 b,c ± 0.71	17.61 a ± 0.01	16.81 a ± 0.67	14.02 b,c ± 0.07
Total sulphur amino acids (TSAAs)	23.10 a,b ± 0.50	24.85 a ± 0.15	17.10 c ± 0.20	12.25 d ± 0.15	17.95 c ± 0.85	16.30 c ± 0.50	23.95 a ± 0.15	20.90 b ± 0.60
TSAAs (%)	2.83 c ± 0.12	3.48 b,c ± 0.02	3.31 b,c ± 0.05	3.90 b ± 0.06	2.92 c ± 0.17	5.59 a ± 0.31	3.37 b,c ± 0.15	3.29 b,c ± 0.06
Cys in TSAAs (%)	40.68 e,f ± 0.42	33.01 g ± 1.41	37.45 f,g ± 2.19	59.60 b ± 0.73	52.41 c ± 0.81	69.04 a ± 0.58	49.26 c,d ± 0.94	44.97 d,e ± 0.14
Total aromatic amino acids (TArAAs)	78.70 a ± 0.00	73.90 a ± 1.30	42.70 c ± 0.40	36.35 c ± 0.45	62.60 b ± 1.30	20.65 d ± 0.45	74.20 a ± 0.60	55.55 b ± 4.55
TArAAs (%)	9.63 b,c ± 0.21	10.35 a,b ± 0.18	8.28 c,d ± 0.04	11.59 a ± 0.19	10.18 a,b ± 0.09	7.09 d ± 0.33	10.44 a,b ± 0.49	8.77 b,c,d ± 0.62
P-PER	2.55 a ± 0.01	1.92 b ± 0.07	1.14 c,d ± 0.03	1.36 c ± 0.01	0.99 d ± 0.02	0.52 e ± 0.02	2.47 a ± 0.00	1.82 b ± 0.07
Leu/Ile ratio	1.82 c ± 0.02	1.91 c ± 0.08	1.09 d ± 0.02	4.09 a ± 0.09	1.24 d ± 0.04	3.32 b ± 0.15	1.81 c ± 0.00	1.94 c ± 0.04
Leu–Ile (difference)	33.60 a ± 0.20	28.85 a,b ± 1.95	3.25 d ± 0.55	32.85 a ± 0.45	7.35 d ± 1.05	16.30 c ± 0.70	32.35 a ± 0.15	26.90 b ± 0.90
Leu–Ile (difference %)	45.16 b ± 0.45	47.68 b ± 2.08	8.61 d ± 0.42	75.51 a ± 0.51	19.33 c ± 0.83	69.78 a ± 1.35	44.87 b ± 0.02	48.54 b ± 1.09
Major taste components
Bitter AAs	254.50 a ± 0.70	214.90 c ± 0.20	173.25 f ± 1.15	111.95 g ± 0.15	179.50 e ± 0.00	77.55 h ± 0.45	250.55 b ± 0.35	194.00 d ± 0.10
Bitter AAs (%)	31.14 b,c ± 0.60	30.09 c,d ± 0.02	33.58 a,b ± 0.09	35.68 a ± 0.18	29.19 c,d ± 0.32	26.62 d ± 0.81	35.25 a ± 1.34	30.64 b,c ± 0.35
Savory (Umami) AAs	229.04 a ± 4.19	210.55 a,b ± 1.15	117.80 d,e ± 0.20	76.05 e,f ± 1.05	177.40 b,c ± 0.30	58.80 f ± 3.20	160.12 c ± 5.52	159.50 c,d ± 0.50
Savory (Umami) AAs (%)	27.99 a,b ± 0.92	29.48 a ± 0.17	22.83 c,d ± 0.13	24.24 b,c,d ± 0.25	28.86 a,b ± 0.37	20.21 d ± 1.59	22.43 c,d ± 1.44	25.19 a,b,c ± 0.36
Sweet AAs	143.55 a ± 5.15	138.75 a ± 0.45	117.45 a,b ± 0.15	57.95 c ± 0.45	132.55 a ± 0.15	91.20 b ± 9.50	124.68 a ± 4.09	138.25 a ± 2.85
Sweet AAs (%)	17.55 b ± 0.24	19.42 b ± 0.06	22.77 b ± 0.06	18.47 b ± 0.08	21.56 b ± 0.26	31.22 a ± 2.48	17.47 b ± 1.04	21.83 b ± 0.21

Values represent mean ± standard error. Means followed by different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05) according to Tukey’s post-hoc test.

). This latter MP, i.e., P. biglobosa leaf, had the highest concentration of TBCAAs. The highest percentages of TNAAs (T. tetraptera, Z. officinale and M. indica), TAAAs (S. aromaticum) and TBAAs (A. cepa, M. indica and P. biglobosa) with respect to the TAAs were also observed in some of these MPs’ parts. Surprisingly, M. indica bark had the highest TEAAs/TNEAAs ratio, percentage of cysteine in TSAAs and percentage of sweet AAs.

The richest TSAAs was found in S. aromaticum flower and P. bigblobosa leaf, while the highest level of TArAAs was noted in these MPs (i.e., S. aromaticum and P. bigblobosa) and A. cepa bulb. Meanwhile, Z. officinale rhizome had the highest Leu/Ile ratio of 4.09. This medicinal plant (Z. officinale) and P. biglobosa also had the greatest percentage of bitter AAs, whereas S. aromaticum recorded the highest percentage of savory (umami) AAs.

The outcome of the experiment revealed that although A. cepa bulb had the richest level of AAs, all the studied MPs’ parts had a TEAAs/TAAs percentage content higher than the 36% considered appropriate for an ideal protein [134,138,142]. Notwithstanding, as reported by Parniakov et al. [143], their TEAAs/TNEAAs ratio being less than unity (< 1) showed that they are not good sources of EAAs. P. biglobosa leaf, followed by A. cepa bulb, had the highest concentration of total BCAAs (leucine, isoleucine and valine), which, according to Jin et al. [144], have antioxidant potentials and play other important roles in the body. In addition, the results of the investigation agree with Tobias et al. [145] that vegetable proteins are also sources of BCAAs. With respect to Esan et al. [138], the percentage of total acidic AAs (TAAAs (%)) of all the tested MPs’ parts greater than that of total basic AAs (TBAAs (%)) indicates that the protein of these plants is chiefly acidic in nature.

Meanwhile, Mendoza [146] noted that cysteine can positively affect mineral absorption and, according to Adeyeye et al. [114,117], most animal proteins have a lower level of this sulfur AA (cysteine) than methionine, in which the reverse is the case in many vegetable proteins. Thus, with respect to the latter authors, M. indica bark, with the significantly (p < 0.05) highest percentage of cysteine in TSAA (69.04%), can be likened to plant proteins, whereas five of the studied MPs’ (A. cepa, S. aromaticum, T. tetraptera, P. biglobosa and P. nitida) parts with a percentage of cysteine in TSAAs less than 50% is similar to those of animal proteins, as Adeyeye et al. [114] reported that cysteine is unlikely to contribute more than 50% of the total SAAs in animal protein. Adeyeye et al. [114] also pointed out that cysteine and tyrosine can supply up to 33.33% of the need for TSAAs and TArAAs, respectively.

According to Kowalczewski et al. [124], PER can be used to assess the nutritional value of a protein in which a value greater than two indicates the high quality of the protein. In this study, A. cepa bulb and P. biglobosa leaf were found to have the significantly highest P-PER. In line with Kowalczewski et al. [124], the P-PER values of these two MPs’ parts (i.e., A. cepa bulb and P. biglobosa leaf) being > 2 suggest that only their protein is of high quality. In contrast, the significantly highest Leu/Ile ratio in Z. officinale rhizome of 4.09 suggests that the excessive intake of this MP, when included as part of a human diet, may contribute to pellagra, as an amino acid imbalance from excess leucine has been connected to the development of this disease because high leucine in the diet impairs tryptophan and niacin metabolism [114]. The results of the major taste components (bitter AAs (%), savory AAs (%) and sweet AAs (%)) of the assessed MPs’ parts agree with Lisiewska et al. [147] that AAs influence the sensory attribute of products.

Amino Acid Score (AAS)

Following the FAO recommended [125] amino acid scoring patterns for young children (6 months to 3 years) as well as for older children, adolescents and adults, a similar statistical result obtained for the EAAs was recorded for the AAS of histidine, the BCAAs (isoleucine, leucine and valine), lysine, threonine and valine in the selected MPs’ parts, as seen in

Table 7. Amino acids scores and limiting amino acid of the selected medicinal plants’ parts following the FAO recommended (2013) amino acid scoring patterns for young children (6 months to 3 years).

Amino Acids	Studied Part with Medicinal Food Plant Applications				Studied Part Used Solely for Medicinal Applications
	A. cepa	S. aromaticum	T. tetraptera	Z. officinale	A. ringens	M. indica	P. biglobosa	P. nitida
Histidine	1.41 a ± 0.00	1.12 b,c ± 0.03	0.94 d ± 0.03	0.31 f ± 0.01	1.04 c ± 0.02	0.45 e ± 0.01	1.17 b ± 0.02	0.91 d ± 0.02
Isoleucine	1.28 a ± 0.02	0.99 c ± 0.02	1.07 b ± 0.01	0.33 e ± 0.00	0.96 c ± 0.02	0.22 f ± 0.00	1.24 a ± 0.00	0.89 d ± 0.01
Leucine	1.13 a ± 0.00	0.92 b ± 0.02	0.57 e ± 0.01	0.66 d ± 0.00	0.58 e ± 0.01	0.35 f ± 0.01	1.09 a ± 0.00	0.84 c ± 0.01
Lysine	0.99 a ± 0.00	0.54 c ± 0.01	0.48 c ± 0.00	0.26 d,e ± 0.00	0.38 c,d ± 0.08	0.19 e ± 0.00	0.80 b ± 0.01	0.54 c ± 0.01
Methionine + cysteine	0.86 a,b ± 0.02	0.92 a ± 0.01	0.63 c ± 0.01	0.45 d ± 0.01	0.66 c ± 0.03	0.60 c ± 0.02	0.89 a ± 0.01	0.77 b ± 0.02
Phenylalanine + tyrosine	1.51 a ± 0.00	1.42 a ± 0.03	0.82 c ± 0.01	0.69 c ± 0.01	1.20 b ± 0.03	0.39 d ± 0.01	1.43 a ± 0.01	1.07 b ± 0.09
Threonine	1.12 a,b ± 0.15	0.99 a,b ± 0.03	0.81 b ± 0.03	0.74 b ± 0.01	0.93 b ± 0.02	1.69 a ± 0.30	0.89 b ± 0.14	0.87 b ± 0.03
Tryptophan	1.14 a,b ± 0.03	0.94 b,c ± 0.01	0.82 c,d ± 0.02	0.69 d,e ± 0.01	1.21 a ± 0.03	0.59 e ± 0.09	1.00 a,b,c ± 0.01	1.21 a ± 0.03
Valine	1.01 b ± 0.00	0.83 c,d ± 0.01	0.74 e ± 0.00	0.42 f ± 0.00	0.78 d ± 0.00	0.33 g ± 0.01	1.22 a ± 0.01	0.84 c ± 0.00
Most limiting AA	Methionine + cysteine	Lysine	Lysine	Lysine	Lysine	Lysine	Lysine	Lysine

Values represent mean ± standard error. Means followed by different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05) according to Tukey’s post-hoc test.

and

Table 8. Amino acids scores and limiting amino acid of the selected medicinal plants’ parts following the FAO recommended (2013) amino acid scoring patterns for older children, adolescents and adults.

Amino Acids	Studied Part with Medicinal Food Plant Applications				Studied Part Used Solely for Medicinal Applications
	A. cepa	S. aromaticum	T. tetraptera	Z. officinale	A. ringens	M. indica	P. biglobosa	P. nitida
Histidine	1.76 a ± 0.00	1.39 b,c ± 0.04	1.17 d ± 0.03	0.39 f ± 0.01	1.29 c ± 0.02	0.57 e ± 0.01	1.46 b ± 0.02	1.14 d ± 0.02
Isoleucine	1.36 a ± 0.02	1.05 c ± 0.02	1.15 b ± 0.01	0.36 e ± 0.01	1.02 c ± 0.02	0.24 f ± 0.01	1.33 a ± 0.01	0.95 d ± 0.01
Leucine	1.22 a ± 0.00	0.99 b ± 0.02	0.62 e ± 0.01	0.71 d ± 0.00	0.62 e ± 0.01	0.38 f ± 0.01	1.18 a ± 0.00	0.91 c ± 0.01
Lysine	1.18 a ± 0.00	0.65 c ± 0.01	0.54 c ± 0.00	0.30 d,e ± 0.01	0.45 c,d ± 0.10	0.24 e ± 0.01	0.95 b ± 0.01	0.65 c ± 0.02
Methionine + cysteine	1.00 a,b ± 0.02	1.08 a ± 0.01	0.74 c ± 0.01	0.53 d ± 0.01	0.78 c ± 0.04	0.71 c ± 0.02	1.04 a ± 0.01	0.91 b ± 0.03
Phenylalanine + tyrosine	1.92 a ± 0.00	1.80 a ± 0.03	1.04 c ± 0.01	0.89 c ± 0.01	1.53 b ± 0.03	0.50 d ± 0.01	1.81 a ± 0.01	1.35 b ± 0.11
Threonine	1.39 a,b ± 0.19	1.23 a,b ± 0.03	1.01 b ± 0.03	0.92 b ± 0.01	1.15 b ± 0.02	2.10 a ± 0.37	1.11 b ± 0.18	1.08 b ± 0.03
Tryptophan	1.47 a,b ± 0.05	1.21 b,c ± 0.02	1.05 c,d ± 0.02	0.89 d,e ± 0.02	1.55 a ± 0.04	0.76 e ± 0.12	1.29 a,b,c ± 0.02	1.55 a ± 0.04
Valine	1.09 b ± 0.01	0.89 c,d ± 0.01	0.79 e ± 0.01	0.45 f ± 0.00	0.84 d ± 0.00	0.36 g ± 0.01	1.32 a ± 0.02	0.90 c ± 0.00
Most limiting AA	-	Lysine	Lysine	Lysine	Lysine	Lysine	Lysine	Lysine

Values represent mean ± standard error. Means followed by different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05) according to Tukey’s post-hoc test.

. The AAS of methionine and cysteine, sulfur AAs [18,23,134,148], based on the two scoring patterns, was highest in S. aromaticum and P. biglobosa, while these two MPs with A. cepa also had the greatest AAS for phenylalanine and tyrosine, aromatic AAs [18].

According to the FAO/WHO [126], the limiting AA (LAA) is the EAA present in the lowest proportion when compared to the same quantity of the standard protein, while Neves et al. [137] noted that scores less than unity pinpoint the LAAs. As shown in Table 7 and Table 8, lysine was the most limiting AA in almost all the assessed MPs’ parts. This is in line with the research finding of Lisiewska et al. [147], where, in relation to protein quality, lysine was the first LAA in the studied kale leaves. The present study’s experimental results also agree with the FAO/WHO [126], which noted that lysine is usually the first-limiting AA in many food sources. Adeyeye et al. [117] also reported that the EAAs that often act in a limiting capacity are lysine, methionine and cysteine, threonine as well as tryptophan. This explains the selection of lysine in Table 8 as the real LAA in M. indica. Among all the studied MPs’ parts, only A. cepa bulb had no LAA for older children, adolescents and adults. Surprisingly, Z. officinale rhizome, with food application, was found to be limiting in all the AAs considered for all the age categories.

To a great extent, the AAS results in Table 7 and Table 8 agree with Bleakley and Hayes [41] as well as Marti-Quijal et al. [121] that plant proteins are often an incomplete protein source as they usually lack one or more EAAs. Hence, aside from A. cepa bulb, all the other studied MPs with food applications (though not consumed majorly as food) are to be combined with other protein sources to achieve the AA requirements in human nutrition [137].

3.4. Principal Component Analysis (PCA)

PCA, an unsupervised clustering/display method, was used to check the similarities, hidden patterns and outliers in the data set obtained as well as reduce the dimensionality [51,149,150]. The biplot from the PCA (Figure 5) showed two principal components, PC1 and PC2, describing 84% of the variation. As seen in quadrant two, there is a close association between the AAs’ composition of A. cepa bulb and P. biglobosa leaf with two AAs (leucine and arginine) contributing principally to the separation of the clusters of these two MPs from those of the others. Meanwhile, the clusters of M. indica bark in quadrant one and Z. officinale rhizome in quadrant three reflect the difference in the AA content of these MPs when compared with the observed levels in the other studied MPs. To a large extent, the PCA revealed that there is no marked difference between the AA composition of MPs that have found food and medicinal applications from those solely used for medicinal purposes.

4. Conclusions

The current study provides the required information on the AA distribution as well as the phytochemicals profile of different MPs’ parts used in SSA for the treatment of CVDs and their associated risk factors. FTIR analysis confirmed the presence of hydroxyl, nitro, amino and other functional groups in the bioactive compounds of the assessed MPs’ parts. Despite the highest crude protein and TAA contents recorded in A. cepa bulb, including the noted quality of its protein, analysis of the TEAAs/TNEAAs ratio revealed that all the studied MPs’ parts are not good sources of EAAs. An investigation on their percentage TAAAs and TBAAs showed that their protein is chiefly acidic in nature, while Z. officinale rhizome, with food application, was found to be limiting in all the AAs considered for all the age categories.

Generally, the study indicated that the use of any of the selected MPs’ parts for CVDs and related risk factors’ treatment in SSA, vis-à-vis their AA composition, is less likely to contribute to an elevation in the circulation of BCAAs and other AAs in a way that would affect human health negatively. It also affirmed that although plants may be incomplete protein sources lacking one or more EAAs, some are rich sources of medicinally important phytochemicals that can assist in the discovery of new drugs for CVDs’ treatment. The inclusion of A. cepa bulb in food for patients (adults) suffering from CVDs and their risk factors is encouraged, while excessive intake of Z. officinale rhizome (Leu/Ile ratio = 4.09) in the human diet or as a traditional home remedy should be avoided to prevent pellagra development.