Next Article in Journal
TCA Cycle Replenishing Pathways in Photosynthetic Purple Non-Sulfur Bacteria Growing with Acetate
Next Article in Special Issue
The Baseline Structure of the Enteric Nervous System and Its Role in Parkinson’s Disease
Previous Article in Journal
The Effect of Different Traditional Chinese Exercises on Blood Lipid in Middle-Aged and Elderly Individuals: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Association of Gut Microbiome Dysbiosis with Neurodegeneration: Can Gut Microbe-Modifying Diet Prevent or Alleviate the Symptoms of Neurodegenerative Diseases?
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Life
Volume 11
Issue 7
10.3390/life11070715
life-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Microbiota Gut–Brain Axis in Ischemic Stroke: A Narrative Review with a Focus about the Relationship with Inflammatory Bowel Disease

by
Emanuele Sinagra
1,2,*,†,
Gaia Pellegatta
3,†,
Valentina Guarnotta
4,
Marcello Maida
5,
Francesca Rossi
1,
Giuseppe Conoscenti
1,
Socrate Pallio
6,
Rita Alloro
1,7,
Dario Raimondo
1,
Fabio Pace
8 and
Andrea Anderloni
3
1
Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Istituto San Raffaele—G. Giglio, Contrada Pietra Pollastra Pisciotto, 90015 Cefalù, Italy
2
Euro-Mediterranean Institute of Science and Technology (IEMEST), 90100 Palermo, Italy
3
Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Rozzano, Italy
4
Endocrinology Section, PROMISE Department, AOUP Paolo Giaccone, 90127 Palermo, Italy
5
Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, S. Elia-Raimondi Hospital, 93100 Caltanissetta, Italy
6
Endoscopy Unit, Department of clinical and experimental medicine, University of Messina, AOUP Policlinico G. Martino, 98125 Messina, Italy
7
Emergency Unit, Fondazione Istituto G. Giglio, Contrada Pietra Pollastra Pisciotto, 90015 Cefalù, Italy
8
Unit of Gastroenterology, Bolognini Hospital, 24100 Bergamo, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
Emanuele Sinagra and Gaia Pellegatta share the 1st authorship.
Life 2021, 11(7), 715; https://doi.org/10.3390/life11070715
Submission received: 28 May 2021 / Revised: 4 July 2021 / Accepted: 13 July 2021 / Published: 19 July 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis in Neurodegenerative Diseases)
Browse Figure
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The gut microbiota is emerging as an important player in neurodevelopment and aging as well as in brain diseases including stroke, Alzheimer’s disease, and Parkinson’s disease. The complex interplay between gut microbiota and the brain, and vice versa, has recently become not only the focus of neuroscience, but also the starting point for research regarding many diseases such as inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). The bi-directional interaction between gut microbiota and the brain is not completely understood. The aim of this review is to sum up the evidencesconcerningthe role of the gut–brain microbiota axis in ischemic stroke and to highlight the more recent evidences about the potential role of the gut–brain microbiota axis in the interaction between inflammatory bowel disease and ischemic stroke.

1. Introduction: The Gut–Brain Microbiota Axis

The extent and mechanisms of interaction between the gut microbiota, defined as an ecological unit composed of microorganisms within a specific environment, and non-gastrointestinal organs are still scanty, although many experimental and clinical experiences show that a bidirectional communication exists between the gut and its microbiota, and the brain [1]. This system, which has not been entirely explored, is based on neural, endocrine, immunological and metabolic pathways [2,3,4]. The communication between the brain and the gut occurs through both neuronal and non-neuronal mechanisms [1]. These communications are defined as “top-down” when signaling is directed from brain to gut, and defined as “bottom-up” when signaling is directed from gut to brain.
In the “bottom up” signaling, the central nervous system (CNS) receives input through a number of different mechanisms. The CNS includes the hypothalamus, amygdala, and hippocampus and their interaction with emotional centers localized within the limbic system, which are mainly involved in the control of body reaction in response to stress [2]. These communications occur:
  • Directly, through the vagus nerve (VN), whose stimulation is mediated by microbial metabolites and neuro-hormones [1] released from the enteric nervous system (ENS), that controls bowel function even though it is completely separate from the CNS; the ENS is made up of interneurons, sensory neurons, motor neurons, and neurotransmitters [2]. Furthermore, neuroinflammation could be caused also by the production of immunogenic microbial endotoxins (such as LPS), that act both through a direct damage or through the activation of immune cells [1,5,6].
  • Indirectly, through the microbial releasing of metabolites such as short-chain fatty acids (SCFA), bile acids, indoles and neurotransmitters that, after entering the systemic blood, travel to the brain in order to modulate the function of neurons, microglia, astrocytes, and the blood brain barrier [1,7,8,9].
  • In the “top-down” signaling, the gut microbiota receives input:
    -
    Indirectly, from the enteric nervous system (ENS). In this context, also the neuroendocrine signaling network mediated by the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis, activated by the integrative reactions of specific centres in the CNS, plays a pivotal role; in fact, it represents a central integrative system essential for the successful physiological adaptation of our organism to stress [2].
    -
    Directly, through the autonomic nervous system (ANS), the pivotal modulator of the ENS [2].
Based on this premise, it is conceivable that gut microbiota might play an important role both under pathological conditions and in physiological processes [10]. Researchers have identified changes in gut microbiota composition of in several diseases, such as inflammatory bowel disease [11], irritable bowel syndrome [12], diabetes [13], cancer [14], and diseases of the nervous system, such as Alzheimer’s disease [15], Parkinson’s disease (PD) [16], spinal cord injury [17], autism [18], and stroke [19].
The aim of this narrative review is to sum up the evidence about the role of the gut–brain microbiota axis in ischemic stroke and to highlight the more recent evidence about the potential role of the gut–brain microbiota axis in the interaction between IBD and ischemic stroke.

2. The Role of Microbiota Gut–Brain Axis in Ischemic Stroke

According to the World Health Organization, strokes are the second leading cause of death and the third leading cause of disability worldwide [20]. Ischemic stroke (IS), defined as an obstruction within a blood vessel supplying blood to the brain (most frequently to the middle cerebral artery (MCA)), accounts for about 70–80% of all strokes [21].
Alterations in gut microbiome can be a risk factor and may also lead to IS. Risk factors for IS and alteration of gut-microbiome composition (defined as dysbiosis) are influenced by similar factors, including aging, metabolic diseases, hypertension, and vascular dysfunction [22] Furthermore, the systemic inflammatory response after IS can impair the clinical outcome after IS, therefore yielding to liver, renal, respiratory, gastrointestinal, and cardiovascular impairment, including the multiple organ dysfunction syndrome [22]. Figure 1 summarizes the signaling involved in the microbiota brain–gut axis.

2.1. The Role of Gut Dysbiosis inInfluencing Stroke Risk Factors

2.1.1. Aging

Little is known about how the gut–brain axis changes with aging [23]. Aging is associated with an impairment of the gut epithelial barrier, a loss of enteric neurons, and an altered mucosal immune function that cause an imbalance in the secretion of proinflammatory cytokines [1]. Such changes, often defined as “inflammeging”, may decreases the ability in the elderly to cope with antigenic, toxic, physical and ischemic stress [1].
Recently, Lee et al. [19] performed a systematic review including eighteen studies, and suggested that aging, inflammation, and different microbial compositions could contribute to ischemic stroke. Interestingly, it was found that the aged mice with a high Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio were more exposed to an IS, and unable to recover from neurological deficits, thus showing a higher mortality rate [23,24].

2.1.2. Metabolic Diseases

With regard to the role of metabolic diseases, evidence arising from randomized controlled trials, showed that lean-donor fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) in subjects with metabolic syndrome improved obesity and insulin sensitivity, thus suggesting that the microbiota can regulate host metabolism as an “organ” [25,26].
It is already known the effect of microbiota-derived metabolites of carbohydrates and proteins on host metabolism. The importance of the involvement of gut–brain microbiota axis in controlling host metabolism was also demonstrated from experimental studies showing that acetate, a SCFA, reaches the hypothalamus through the blood-brain barrier, and induces the production of gamma-aminobutyric acid, resulting in suppression of central appetite [25,27].
Further pathways include also: peptide YY production through GPR41, which inhibits intestinal motility and increases the absorption rate of nutrients through the intestinal epithelium [28], the beneficial role of indole and its derivatives (through the production of the incretin hormone GLP-1 from intestinal enteroendocrine cells) [29] and the harmful effect of imidazole propionate, a microbial metabolites of histidine [25,30]. Furthermore, microbial-derived metabolites control bile acid homeostasis via farnesoid X receptors, which can also influence glucose metabolism [25,31].

2.1.3. Arterial Hypertension and Vascular Dysfunction

The gut microbiota is probably involved in the genesis of hypertension, despite the mechanism is not yet fully elucidated.
It has been shown that in spontaneously hypertensive rats, a significant decrease in the composition of microflora in the gut occur, associated with an increase in the ratio of Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes [32,33]. Infusion of angiotensin II (AngII) attenuated the blood pressure increase in germ-free mice compared with conventionally raised mice, indicating that gut microbiota involves blood pressure regulation [32,34].
Furthermore, the role of various G-protein-coupled receptors (GPRs) in hypertension has been pointed out [32,35]. In fact, the gut microbial metabolites SCFAs modulate the activity of GPRs, including GPR41, GPR43, and GPR109A [32,35].
On the other hand, high-fiber diet and acetate supplementation significantly decrease diastolic blood pressure, cardiac fibrosis and ventricular hypertrophy when compared to a control standard diet [36] thus suggesting that the gut microbiota-producing SCFAs in circulation play an important role in hypertension [32].
Finally, the gut microbial metabolite, SCFAs, and their effect on ox-LDL levels and other pathways may also contribute to increasing arterial pressure [32], for example by inhibiting nitric oxide synthesis (NO) and endothelin-1 [37,38].
As in the case of arterial hypertension and metabolic diseases, bacterial metabolites such as SCFAs, nitrites, flavanol, Trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO), indoles, and sulfidic acid have been identified all as causative factors of vascular dysfunction [22]. In the case of TMAO, a link between this microbial metabolite with atherosclerosis has been well established [1]. SCFAs and sulfidic acid are particularly capable of inducing vasodilatation, whereas indole and TMAO increase the production of reactive oxygen species, thus reducing cerebral vasodilatation [22].

2.2. The Effect of Gut Dysbiosis in Influencing Stroke Outcomes

As indicated by the aforementioned review performed by Lee et al. [19], stroke may be linked with gut dysbiosis, altering the microbial composition, and therefore conditioning the post-stroke outcome [6,23,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53]. An inverted Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio is suggested to be a hallmark for aging, and it is significantly associated with ischemic stroke in mouse models [19].
In fact, these studies focused on dysbiosis-induced intestinal paralysis, an increased gut permeability and the loss of cholinergic innervation in ileum, and an increased sympathetic activity [1,5,40,54].
Another point of interest is the relationship between the dysbiosis and specific inflammatory markers that are present in the stroke mice. As SCFAs and TMAO have been shown as the emerging factors in ischemic stroke in animal studies, further studies investigating the association between SCFAs and TMAO among patients need to be performed [19].
Furthermore, changes caused by stroke on the gut microbiota can induce neurological complications, stroke-associated pneumonia, cardiovascular complications, gastrointestinal complications, and renal dysfunction, with possible development of the systemic inflammatory response and multiple organ dysfunction syndromes [22].
With regard to neurological complications, after stroke, innate immune cells respond within hours, followed by the adaptive immune response through activation of T and B lymphocytes. Subpopulations of T-cells can help or worsen ischemic brain injury [21]. Pro-inflammatory Th1, Th17, and γδ T-cells are often associated with increased inflammatory damage, whereas regulatory T-cells are known to suppress post-ischemic inflammation by increasing the secretion of anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 [21]. Therefore, all these changes could influence the stroke severity, and therefore the cognitive, motor and sensory dysfunction.
Complication following stroke is pneumonia, representing a further example of dysbiosis-induced infection, with an incidence occurring in up to 10% of cases of IS [22,55], and in turn linked with immunosuppression and dysphagia [22,55,56].
Cardiovascular complications, occurring in up to 39% of cases of IS, and including several conditions, such as arrhythmias, Takotsubo syndrome, and myocardial infarction, are presumably linked with post-stroke dysbiosis [22,57]. In fact, as aforementioned, in this setting the altered secretion of TMAO increases the production of reactive oxygen species, thus reducing cerebral vasodilatation. Moreover, other studies demonstrated that serum levels of gamma-butyrobetaine and trimethyl-lysine, metabolites of carnitine, were also associated with cardiovascular death [58]. With regard to renal dysfunction, occurring in up to 10% of cases of IS, it is also influenced by stroke-induced dysbiosis [10,59]. Here, the link is atherosclerosis [60]; and probably also the altered secretion of TMAO following an inflammatory process which supports the existence of a gut–brain–kidney axis, associated with tubule-interstitial fibrosis and renal dysfunction [10,58,61].
Finally, a multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS), due to the release of intestinal lumen bacteria and toxins into the circulation, may occur in up to 12% of cases of IS thus enhancing systemic inflammation and causing sepsis or a systemic inflammatory response [62]. Despite that a clear correlation between its occurrence and a microbiota gut–brain axis has not been clearly demonstrated, an impaired intestinal permeability (defined as “leaky gut”) could be considered as trigger factor in this setting [10].

3. The Role of the Gut–Brain Microbiota Axis in the Occurrence of Gastrointestinal Complications after Ischemic Stroke, and the Focus about the Link between Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Ischemic Stroke

After an acute ischemic stroke up to 50% of patients can present gastrointestinal complications such bleeding, bowel obstruction and incontinence, and dysphagia. These complications may increase the days of hospitalization and the risk of mortality [51]. To date, clinical and experimental data about gastrointestinal consequences after acute ischemic stroke are limited (Table 1).
Experimental traumatic brain injury in rats is associated with severe mucosal atrophy and disruption of gut epithelial cell tight junctions after few hours from stroke, which can persist for 7 days [60].
In two Chinese studies it has been observed in murine models that ischemic stroke leads to destruction and necrosis of the small bowel villus epithelium with consequences on small intestinal motility [63,64].
Recently, it has been demonstrated that experimental induced stroke in mice leads to noradrenaline release with altered cecal mucoprotein production and goblet cell numbers. These changes are associated with a mutation in the composition of cecal microbiota, with specific changes in Peptococcaceae and Prevotellaceae correlating with the extent of injury [65].
In a recent prospective case–control study rectal swabs from stroke patients were collected within 24 h of hospital admission. This study showed an altered microbiota composition in adults with acute ischemic stroke and cerebral hemorrhage. In particular, patients after stroke showed a higher level of bacteria implicated in trimethylamine-N-oxide (TMAO) production and a loss of butyrate-producing bacteria. In particular, butyrate-producing bacteria have been identified to play a protective role against a variety of systemic infectious diseases. Moreover, a butyrate-producing bacteria increase was independently associated with reduced infection rate [44].
In a recent study the authors found a reduction of SCFAs-producing bacteria in cases with ischemic stroke when compared to controls [45]. Nonetheless, a study showed that the butyrate-producing bacteria were remarkably less abundant in ischemic stroke and with increasing abundance of lactic acid bacteria [46].
In another study the authors investigated the effects on cellularity of the lymphoid tissue of the gut. In particular, they observed a reduction of T and B cells after ischemic stroke, and a stability in the amount of natural killer cells and macrophages [66].
A reduction in parasympathetic nerve activity following acute CNS injury is associated with overgrowth of bacteria in the bowel and increased bacterial translocation. Substances released by bacteria and metabolites and media released by the gastrointestinal immune system can affect gastrointestinal movement [67,68].
In particular, it has been described that, after CNS injury as ischemic stroke, mast cells present in the gut release histamine and tryptase activating submucosal neurons and peptidergic neurons to secrete vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) which alters the movements of the gastrointestinal tract [69].
Enteric nervous system with the release of nitric oxide can also lead to a delay of gastric emptying [70].
Recently a link between ischemic stroke and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has been proposed and some interesting studies about the relationship between these two clinical entities are currently available in literature.
In particular, IBD patients present a higher risk for arterial and venous thromboem-bolism (TE) than patients without IBD and this complication is associated with a consid-erable morbidity and mortality rates (overall mortality 25% per episode). In particular, cerebrovascular TE represents the most frequent and severe CNS complication in IBD [70].
In a retrospective single center cohort study, it has been demonstrated that the risk of TE is higher in patients with active IBD than IBD in remission [71].
In a population-based retrospective cohort study it has been shown that the frequency of IBD exacerbation and hospitalization are risk factors for ischemic stroke [72].
Current data regarding cerebrovascular risk modification induced by treatment for IBD are contradictory. A beneficial effect with increased carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV) has been shown with salicylates, but not with steroids or azathioprine. Moreover, TNF-a inhibitors appear to decrease the ischemic heart disease rate but increase the risk of cerebrovascular events [73].
Currently some studies reported a possible role of gut dysbiosis in the association between IBD and ischemic stroke (Table 1).
In particular in IBD patients has been described an expansion of potential pathogens such as Enterobacteriaceae including E. coli and changes in microbial composition with a reduction of Firmicutes species [74]. Moreover, the metabolic pathway of amino acid biosynthesis, carbohydrate metabolism, oxidative stress and bile salt seem to be modified in the microbiota of patients affected by IBD, suggesting a functional impact of gut microbiota on pathogenesis of these diseases [74].
In IBD patients has been reported an aberrant immune response to microbial dysbiosis due to genetic alteration in innate immunity, intestinal barrier, microbial recognition and processing. It leads to a persistently stimulation of proinflammatory condition and macrophage/monocyte infiltration in the gut [3].
Some recent studies present an excellent example for the modulation by gut microbiota through gut–brain axis via bottom-up in IBD related neurological complication such as memory impairment and anxiety-like behavior in animal models [75,76,77].
Since IBD patients present higher risk of ischemic stroke, the gut–brain axis is very likely to represent a potential link between gut pathology and the increased risk of ischemic stroke. However, currently there are still no studies in the literature regarding the role of gut–brain axis in the relationship between ischemic stroke and IBD. Moreover, there is no data about the potential role of IBD therapies on risk of ischemic stroke.
Future studies are needed to establish causal association between active IBD and cerebrovascular events in order to also establish a possible therapeutic target.

4. Conclusions and Perspectives

The brain–gut axis communication occur through both neuronal and non-neuronal pathways supporting notion that gut microbiota might play a role in many pathological and physiological conditions. A relationship between gut microbiota and ischemic stroke has been reported. The gut dysbiosis has a strong influence on stroke risk factors such as aging, metabolic disease and arterial hypertension. In addition, the brain–gut axis appear significantly distressed after stroke by injury, with induced damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) and cytokine release, resulting in neurological, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal and nephrological complications with a possible multiple organ dysfunction. Notably, the gastrointestinal complications are very common and may be related to an increase in bacteria involved in the TMAO production and loss of butyrate-producing bacteria. Interestingly, a link between inflammatory bowel disease and its grade activity with ischemic stroke has been suggested. However, the exact molecular mechanisms underlying the changes in the brain–gut axis and the related inflammatory and immune responses after ischemic stroke should be further investigated. Prospective studies to identify the bacterial species of microbiota involved in ischemic stroke are required. Gut microbiota analysis could act as a potential personalized therapeutic approach for the treatment of cardiovascular and metabolic diseases against stroke.

Author Contributions

E.S. and G.P. designed the study; E.S., G.P., R.A., V.G., F.R., G.C. and M.M. wrote the paper; F.P., D.R., A.A. and S.P. supervised the work. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

All the authors declare that this research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors, and thus there is no conflict of interest regarding this paper.

References

  1. Durgan, D.J.; Lee, J.; McCullough, L.D.; Bryan, R.M., Jr. Examining the Role of the Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis in Stroke. Stroke 2019, 50, 2270–2277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Sinagra, E.; Utzeri, E.; Morreale, G.C.; Fabbri, C.; Pace, F.; Anderloni, A. Microbiota-gut-brain axis and its affect inflammatory bowel disease: Pathophysiological concepts and insights for clinicians. World J. Clin. Cases 2020, 8, 1013–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Rhee, S.H.; Pothoulakis, C.; Mayer, E.A. Principles and clinical implications of the brain-gut-enteric microbiota axis. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2009, 6, 306–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. El Aidy, S.; Dinan, T.G.; Cryan, J.F. Gut Microbiota: The Conductor in the Orchestra of Immune-Neuroendocrine Communication. Clin. Ther. 2015, 37, 954–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Singh, V.; Roth, S.; Llovera, G.; Sadler, R.; Garzetti, D.; Stecher, B.; Dichgans, M.; Liesz, A. Microbiota Dysbiosis Controls the Neuroinflammatory Response after Stroke. J. Neurosci. 2016, 36, 7428–7440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Benakis, C.; Brea, D.; Caballero, S.; Faraco, G.; Moore, J.; Murphy, M.; Sita, G.; Racchumi, G.; Ling, L.; Pamer, E.G.; et al. Commensal microbiota affects ischemic stroke outcome by regulating intestinal γδ T cells. Nat. Med. 2016, 22, 516–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Erny, D.; Hrabě de Angelis, A.L.; Jaitin, D.; Wieghofer, P.; Staszewski, O.; David, E.; Keren-Shaul, H.; Mahlakoiv, T.; Jakobshagen, K.; Buch, T.; et al. Host microbiota constantly control maturation and function of microglia in the CNS. Nat. Neurosci. 2015, 18, 965–977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Sun, J.; Ling, Z.; Wang, F.; Chen, W.; Li, H.; Jin, J.; Zhang, H.; Pang, M.; Yu, J.; Liu, J. Clostridium butyricum pretreatment attenuates cerebral ischemia/reperfusion injury in mice via anti-oxidation and anti-apoptosis. Neurosci. Lett. 2016, 613, 30–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Sun, J.; Wang, F.; Ling, Z.; Yu, X.; Chen, W.; Li, H.; Jin, J.; Pang, M.; Zhang, H.; Yu, J. Clostridium butyricum attenuates cerebral ischemia/reperfusion injury in diabetic mice via modulation of gut microbiota. Brain Res. 2016, 1642, 180–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Winek, K.; Dirnagl, U.; Meisel, A. The Gut Microbiome as Therapeutic Target in Central Nervous System Diseases: Implications for Stroke. Neurotherapeutics 2016, 13, 762–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Ni, J.; Wu, G.D.; Albenberg, L.; Tomov, V.T. Gut microbiota and IBD: Causation or correlation? Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2017, 14, 573–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Quigley, E.M.M. The Gut-Brain Axis and the Microbiome: Clues to Pathophysiology and Opportunities for Novel Management Strategies in Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS). J. Clin. Med. 2018, 7, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Zhang, S.; Cai, Y.; Meng, C.; Ding, X.; Huang, J.; Luo, X.; Cao, Y.; Gao, F.; Zou, M. The role of the microbiome in diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2021, 172, 108645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Song, B.C.; Bai, J. Microbiome-gut-brain axis in cancer treatment-related psychoneurological toxicities and symptoms: A systematic review. Supportive Care Cancer 2021, 29, 605–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Goyal, D.; Ali, S.A.; Singh, R.K. Emerging role of gut microbiota in modulation of neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration with emphasis on Alzheimer’s disease. Prog. Neuro Psychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 2021, 106, 110112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Shen, T.; Yue, Y.; He, T.; Huang, C.; Qu, B.; Lv, W.; Lai, H.Y. The Association between the Gut Microbiota and Parkinson’s Disease, a Meta-Analysis. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2021, 13, 636545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Jing, Y.; Bai, F.; Yu, Y. Spinal cord injury and gut microbiota: A review. Life Sci. 2021, 266, 118865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Moradi, K.; Ashraf-Ganjouei, A.; Tavolinejad, H.; Bagheri, S.; Akhondzadeh, S. The interplay between gut microbiota and autism spectrum disorders: A focus on immunological pathways. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 2021, 106, 110091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Lee, Y.T.; Mohd Ismail, N.I.; Wei, L.K. Microbiome and ischemic stroke: A systematic review. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0245038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Johnson, W.; Onuma, O.; Owolabi, M.; Sachdev, S. Stroke: A global response is needed. Bull. World Health Organ. 2016, 94, 634A. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Arya, A.K.; Hu, B. Brain-gut axis after stroke. Brain Circ. 2018, 4, 165–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Battaglini, D.; Pimentel-Coelho, P.M.; Robba, C.; Dos Santos, C.C.; Cruz, F.F.; Pelosi, P.; Rocco, P.R.M. Gut Microbiota in Acute Ischemic Stroke: From Pathophysiology to Therapeutic Implications. Front. Neurol. 2020, 11, 598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Spychala, M.S.; Venna, V.R.; Jandzinski, M.; Doran, S.J.; Durgan, D.J.; Ganesh, B.P.; Ajami, N.J.; Putluri, N.; Graf, J.; Bryan, R.M.; et al. Age-related changes in the gut microbiota influence systemic inflammation and stroke outcome. Ann. Neurol. 2018, 84, 23–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Jandzinski, M. Manipulation of the Microbiome and Its Impact on Functional Recovery Following Ischemic Stroke. Honors Scholar Theses. University of Connecticut. 2015. Available online: https://opencommons.uconn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=1444&context=srhonors_theses (accessed on 18 July 2021).
  25. Kootte, R.S.; Levin, E.; Salojärvi, J.; Smits, L.P.; Hartstra, A.V.; Udayappan, S.D.; Hermes, G.; Bouter, K.E.; Koopen, A.M.; Holst, J.J.; et al. Improvement of Insulin Sensitivity after Lean Donor Feces in Metabolic Syndrome Is Driven by Baseline Intestinal Microbiota Composition. Cell Metab. 2017, 26, 611–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Frost, G.; Sleeth, M.L.; Sahuri-Arisoylu, M.; Lizarbe, B.; Cerdan, S.; Brody, L.; Anastasovska, J.; Ghourab, S.; Hankir, M.; Zhang, S.; et al. The short-chain fatty acid acetate reduces appetite via a central homeostatic mechanism. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 3611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Samuel, B.S.; Shaito, A.; Motoike, T.; Rey, F.E.; Backhed, F.; Manchester, J.K.; Hammer, R.E.; Williams, S.C.; Crowley, J.; Yanagisawa, M.; et al. Effects of the gut microbiota on host adiposity are modulated by the short-chain fatty-acid binding G protein-coupled receptor, Gpr41. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 16767–16772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Roager, H.M.; Licht, T.R. Microbial tryptophan catabolites in health and disease. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 3294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Koh, A.; Molinaro, A.; Ståhlman, M.; Khan, M.T.; Schmidt, C.; Mannerås-Holm, L.; Wu, H.; Carreras, A.; Jeong, H.; Olofsson, L.E.; et al. Microbially Produced Imidazole Propionate Impairs Insulin Signaling through mTORC1. Cell 2018, 175, 947–961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Ahmad, T.R.; Haeusler, R.A. Bile acids in glucose metabolism and insulin signalling-mechanisms and research needs. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2019, 15, 701–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Duttaroy, A.K. Role of Gut Microbiota and Their Metabolites on Atherosclerosis, Hypertension and Human Blood Platelet Function: A Review. Nutrients 2021, 13, 144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Yang, T.; Santisteban, M.M.; Rodriguez, V.; Li, E.; Ahmari, N.; Carvajal, J.M.; Zadeh, M.; Gong, M.; Qi, Y.; Zubcevic, J.; et al. Gut dysbiosis is linked to hypertension. Hypertension 2015, 65, 1331–1340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Karbach, S.H.; Schönfelder, T.; Brandão, I.; Wilms, E.; Hörmann, N.; Jäckel, S.; Schüler, R.; Finger, S.; Knorr, M.; Lagrange, J.; et al. Gut Microbiota Promote Angiotensin II-Induced Arterial Hypertension and Vascular Dysfunction. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2016, 5, e003698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Pluznick, J.L. Renal and cardiovascular sensory receptors and blood pressure regulation. Am. J. Physiol. Renal. Physiol. 2013, 305, 439–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Almeida, C.; Barata, P.; Fernandes, R. The influence of gut microbiota in cardiovascular diseases-a brief review. Porto Biomed. J. 2021, 6, e106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ma, F.X.; Zhou, B.; Chen, Z.; Ren, Q.; Lu, S.H.; Sawamura, T.; Han, Z.C. Oxidized low density lipoprotein impairs endothelial progenitor cells by regulation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase. J. Lipid. Res. 2006, 47, 1227–1237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Subah Packer, C. Estrogen protection, oxidized LDL, endothelial dysfunction and vasorelaxation in cardiovascular disease: New insights into a complex issue. Cardiovasc. Res. 2007, 73, 6–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Stanley, D.; Mason, L.J.; Mackin, K.E.; Srikhanta, Y.N.; Lyras, D.; Prakash, M.D.; Nurgali, K.; Venegas, A.; Hill, M.D.; Moore, R.J.; et al. Translocation and dissemination of commensal bacteria in post-stroke infection. Nat. Med. 2016, 22, 1277–1284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Tonomura, S.; Ihara, M.; Friedland, R.P. Microbiota in cerebrovascular disease: A key player and future therapeutic target. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2020, 40, 1368–1380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Crapser, J.; Ritzel, R.; Verma, R.; Venna, V.R.; Liu, F.; Chauhan, A.; Koellhoffer, E.; Patel, A.; Ricker, A.; Maas, K.; et al. Ischemic stroke induces gut permeability and enhances bacterial translocation leading to sepsis in aged mice. Aging. 2016, 8, 1049–1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Haak, B.W.; Westendorp, W.F.; van Engelen, T.S.R.; Brands, X.; Brouwer, M.C.; Vermeij, J.D.; Hugenholtz, F.; Verhoeven, A.; Derks, R.J.; Giera, M.; et al. Disruptions of Anaerobic Gut Bacteria Are Associated with Stroke and Post-stroke Infection: A Prospective Case-Control Study. Transl. Stroke Res. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Tan, C.; Wu, Q.; Wang, H.; Gao, X.; Xu, R.; Cui, Z.; Zhu, J.; Zeng, X.; Zhou, H.; He, Y.; et al. Dysbiosis of Gut Microbiota and Short-Chain Fatty Acids in Acute Ischemic Stroke and the Subsequent Risk for Poor Functional Outcomes. JPEN J. Parenter. Enteral. Nutr. 2021, 45, 518–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Li, H.; Zhang, X.; Pan, D.; Liu, Y.; Yan, X.; Tang, Y.; Tao, M.; Gong, L.; Zhang, T.; Woods, C.R.; et al. Dysbiosis characteristics of gut microbiota in cerebral infarction patients. Transl. Neurosci. 2020, 11, 124–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Huang, L.; Wang, T.; Wu, Q.; Dong, X.; Shen, F.; Liu, D.; Qin, X.; Yan, L.; Wan, Q. Analysis of microbiota in elderly patients with Acute Cerebral Infarction. PeerJ 2019, 7, e6928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Li, N.; Wang, X.; Sun, C.; Wu, X.; Lu, M.; Si, Y.; Ye, X.; Wang, T.; Yu, X.; Zhao, X.; et al. Change of intestinal microbiota in cerebral ischemic stroke patients. BMC Microbiol. 2019, 19, 191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Xia, G.H.; You, C.; Gao, X.X.; Zeng, X.L.; Zhu, J.J.; Xu, K.Y.; Tan, C.H.; Xu, R.T.; Wu, Q.H.; Zhou, H.W.; et al. Stroke Dysbiosis Index (SDI) in Gut Microbiome Are Associated with Brain Injury and Prognosis of Stroke. Front. Neurol. 2019, 10, 397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Wang, W.; Li, X.; Yao, X.; Cheng, X.; Zhu, Y. The characteristics analysis of intestinal microecology on cerebral infarction patients and its correlation with apolipoprotein E. Medicine 2018, 97, e12805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Singh, V.; Sadler, R.; Heindl, S.; Llovera, G.; Roth, S.; Benakis, C.; Liesz, A. The gut microbiome primes a cerebroprotective immune response after stroke. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2018, 38, 1293–1298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Stanley, D.; Moore, R.J.; Wong, C.H.Y. An insight into intestinal mucosal microbiota disruption after stroke. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Boaden, E.; Lyons, M.; Singhrao, S.K.; Dickinson, H.; Leathley, M.; Lightbody, C.E.; McLoughlin, A.; Khan, Z.; Crean, S.; Smith, C.; et al. Oral flora in acute stroke patients: A prospective exploratory observational study. Gerodontology 2017, 34, 343–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Yamashiro, K.; Tanaka, R.; Urabe, T.; Ueno, Y.; Yamashiro, Y.; Nomoto, K.; Takahashi, T.; Tsuji, H.; Asahara, T.; Hattori, N. Gut dysbiosis is associated with metabolism and systemic inflammation in patients with ischemic stroke. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0171521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Yin, J.; Liao, S.X.; He, Y.; Wang, S.; Xia, G.H.; Liu, F.T.; Zhu, J.J.; You, C.; Chen, Q.; Zhou, L.; et al. Dysbiosis of Gut Microbiota with Reduced Trimethylamine-N-Oxide Level in Patients With Large-Artery Atherosclerotic Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2015, 4, e002699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Vermeij, J.D.; Westendorp, W.F.; van de Beek, D.; Nederkoorn, P.J. Post-stroke infections and preventive antibiotics in stroke: Update of clinical evidence. Int. J. Stroke 2018, 13, 913–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Santos Samary, C.; Pelosi, P.; Leme Silva, P.; Rieken Macedo Rocco, P. Immunomodulation after ischemic stroke: Potential mechanisms and implications for therapy. Crit. Care 2016, 20, 391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Martino, R.; Foley, N.; Bhogal, S.; Diamant, N.; Speechley, M.; Teasell, R. Dysphagia after stroke: Incidence, diagnosis, and pulmonary complications. Stroke 2005, 36, 2756–2763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Battson, M.L.; Lee, D.M.; Weir, T.L.; Gentile, C.L. The gut microbiota as a novel regulator of cardiovascular function and disease. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2018, 56, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Skagen, K.; Trøseid, M.; Ueland, T.; Holm, S.; Abbas, A.; Gregersen, I.; Kummen, M.; Bjerkeli, V.; Reier-Nilsen, F.; Russell, D.; et al. The Carnitine-butyrobetaine-trimethylamine-N-oxide pathway and its association with cardiovascular mortality in patients with carotid atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis 2016, 247, 64–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Hénaut, L.; Grissi, M.; Brazier, F.; Assem, M.; Poirot-Leclercq, S.; Lenglet, G.; Boudot, C.; Avondo, C.; Boullier, A.; Choukroun, G.; et al. Cellular and molecular mechanisms associated with ischemic stroke severity in female mice with chronic kidney disease. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 6432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Arnold, J.; Ng, K.P.; Sims, D.; Gill, P.; Cockwell, P.; Ferro, C. Incidence and impact on outcomes of acute kidney injury after a stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Nephrol. 2018, 19, 283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  60. Liu, H.B.; Tian, J.; Zhao, J.X.; Song, D.B.; Tian, J.K. Study on the clinical epidemiological features of acute cerebral stroke inducing systemic inflammatory response syndrome and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi 2008, 29, 294–296. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  61. Toyoda, K.; Ninomiya, T. Stroke and cerebrovascular diseases in patients with chronic kidney disease. Lancet Neurol. 2014, 13, 823–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Tang, W.H.; Wang, Z.; Kennedy, D.J.; Wu, Y.; Buffa, J.A.; Agatisa-Boyle, B.; Li, X.S.; Levison, B.S.; Hazen, S.L. Gut microbiota-dependent trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO) pathway contributes to both development of renal insufficiency and mortality risk in chronic kidney disease. Circ. Res. 2015, 116, 448–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Xu, X.; Zhu, Y.; Chuai, J. Changes in serum ghrelin and small intestinal motility in rats with ischemic stroke. Anat. Rec. Adv. Integr. Anat. Evol. Biol. 2012, 295, 307–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Hang, C.H.; Shi, J.X.; Li, J.S.; Wu, W.; Yin, H.X. Alterations of intestinal mucosa structure and barrier function following traumatic brain injury in rats. World J. Gastroenterol. 2003, 9, 2776–2781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Liu, Y.; Luo, S.; Kou, L.; Chaogang, T.; Ruxun, H.; Zhong, P.; Zhendong, L. Ischemic stroke damages the intestinal mucosa and induces alteration of the intestinal lymphocytes and CCL19 mRNA in rats. Neurosci. Lett. 2017, 658, 165–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Houlden, A.; Goldrick, M.; Brough, D.; Vizi, E.S.; Lénárt, N.; Martinecz, B.; Roberts, I.S.; Denes, A. Brain injury induces specific changes in the caecal microbiota of mice via altered autonomic activity and mucoprotein production. Brain Behav. Immun. 2016, 57, 10–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Schulte-Herbrüggen, O.; Quarcoo, D.; Meisel, A.; Meisel, C. Differential affection of intestinal immune cell populations after cerebral ischemia in mice. Neuroimmunomodulation 2009, 16, 213–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Sorby-Adams, A.J.; Marcoionni, A.M.; Dempsey, E.R.; Woenig, J.A.; Turner, R.J. The role of neurogenic inflammation in blood-brain barrier disruption and development of cerebral oedema following acute central nervous system (CNS) injury. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 1788. [Google Scholar]
  69. Barbara, G.; Stanghellini, V.; Brandi, G.; Cremon, C.; di Nardo, G.; de Giorgio, R.; Corinaldesi, R. Interactions between commensal bacteria and gut sensorimotor function in health and disease. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2005, 100, 2560–2568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Huh, J.R.; Veiga-Fernandes, H. Neuroimmune circuits in inter-organ communication. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2019, 20, 217–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Kohoutova, D.; Moravkova, P.; Kruzliak, P.; Bures, J. Thromboembolic complications in inflammatory bowel disease. J. Thromb. Thrombolysis 2015, 39, 489–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Bollen, L.; Casteele, N.C.; Ballet, V. Thromboembolism as an important complication of inflammatory bowel disease. Eur. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2016, 28, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Huang, W.-S.; Tseng, C.-H.; Chen, P.-C.; Tsai, C.-H.; Lin, C.-L.; Sung, F.-C.; Kao, C.-H. Inflammatory bowel diseases increase future ischemic stroke risk: A Taiwanese population-based retrospective cohort study. Eur. J. Intern. Med. 2014, 25, 561–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Ana Maria, F.; Lucian, N.; Michelle, D.; Andreea, C.; Carmen, M.P.; Dragos, V. Cardiovascular involvement in inflammatory bowel disease: Dangerous liaisons. World J. Gastroenterol. 2015, 21, 9688–9692. [Google Scholar]
  75. Jacob, R.E.; Kevin, H.; Elaine, N.M.; Manvir, K.; Colin, R.; Kim, E.B.; Mélanie, G.G. Modulation of the microbiota-gut-brain axis by probiotics in a murine model of inflammatory bowel disease. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2016, 310, 989–998. [Google Scholar]
  76. Lee, H.J.; Jeong, J.J.; Han, M.J.; Kim, D.H. Lactobacillus plantarum c29 alleviates TNBS-induced memory impairment in mice. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018, 28, 175–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Jang, S.-E.; Lim, S.-M.; Jeong, J.-J.; Jang, H.-M.; Lee, H.-J.; Han, M.J.; Kim, D.-H. Gastrointestinal inflammation by gut microbiota disturbance induces memory impairment in mice. Mucosal Immunol. 2018, 11, 369–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Life 11 00715 g001 550
Figure 1. Summarizes the signaling involved in the microbiota brain–gut axis.
Figure 1. Summarizes the signaling involved in the microbiota brain–gut axis.
Life 11 00715 g001
Table
Table 1. Summarizes the evidences regarding the role of the gut–brain microbiota axis in the occurrence of gastrointestinal complications after ischemic stroke, and the link between the microbiota gut–brain axis, IBD and ischemic stroke.
Table 1. Summarizes the evidences regarding the role of the gut–brain microbiota axis in the occurrence of gastrointestinal complications after ischemic stroke, and the link between the microbiota gut–brain axis, IBD and ischemic stroke.
Role of the Gut–Brain Microbiota Axis in the Occurrence of Gastrointestinal Complications after Ischemic Stroke
AuthorYear of PublicationType of StudyPopulation Results
Hang C.H. et al. [64]2003Pre-clinical studyMice subjected to experimental strokeSevere mucosal atrophy and disruption of gut epithelial cell tight junctions after few hours from stroke to 7 days
Xu X. et al. [63]2012Pre-clinical studyMice subjected to experimental strokeDecreased gastrointestinal motility and damage to the intestinal mucosa existed in rats with experimental stroke
Liu Y. et al. [65]2017Pre-clinical studyMice subjected to experimental strokeIschemic stroke significantly damaged the intestinal epithelium and activated intestinal immunity.
Houlden A. et al. [66]2016Pre-clinical studyMice subjected to experimental strokeNoradrenaline release with alteration of cecal mucoprotein production, goblet cell numbers, composition of cecal microbiota, with specific changes in Peptococcaceae and Prevotellaceae
Haak B.W. et al. [42]2020Prospective case–control studyStroke patients and controlsAltered microbiota composition in adults with stroke with higher level of bacteria implicated in trimethylamine-N-oxide (TMAO) production and a loss of butyrate-producing bacteria.
Tan C. et al. [43]2021Prospective case–control studyStroke patients and controlsDysbiosis of SCFAs-producing bacteria and SCFAs in AIS patients increased the subsequent risk for poor functional outcomes
Li H. et al. [44]2020Prospective case–control studyStroke patients and controlsThe abundance and functions ofbutyrate-producing bacteria in stroke patients were significantly decreased while lactic acid bacteria were increased.
Schulte-Herbrüggen O. et al. [67]2009Pre-clinical studyMice subjected to experimental strokePeyer’s patches revealed a significant reduction of T and B cell counts after cerebral ischemia.
Link between inflammatory bowel disease and ischemic stroke
Bollen L. et al. [73]2016retrospective monocentric cohort studyIBD patients with a history of TE83% of patients developed a venous TE. At the time of TE, 71% patients were diagnosed with active disease
Huang W.S. et al. [45]2014population-based retrospective cohort studyIBD adult patients and IBD-free controlsThe risk of ischemic stroke was 1.12-fold higher among the IBD cohort than among the non-IBD cohort. The risk of developing ischemic stroke significantly increased with the increased frequency of IBD exacerbation and hospitalization.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sinagra, E.; Pellegatta, G.; Guarnotta, V.; Maida, M.; Rossi, F.; Conoscenti, G.; Pallio, S.; Alloro, R.; Raimondo, D.; Pace, F.; et al. Microbiota Gut–Brain Axis in Ischemic Stroke: A Narrative Review with a Focus about the Relationship with Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Life 2021, 11, 715. https://doi.org/10.3390/life11070715

AMA Style

Sinagra E, Pellegatta G, Guarnotta V, Maida M, Rossi F, Conoscenti G, Pallio S, Alloro R, Raimondo D, Pace F, et al. Microbiota Gut–Brain Axis in Ischemic Stroke: A Narrative Review with a Focus about the Relationship with Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Life. 2021; 11(7):715. https://doi.org/10.3390/life11070715

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sinagra, Emanuele, Gaia Pellegatta, Valentina Guarnotta, Marcello Maida, Francesca Rossi, Giuseppe Conoscenti, Socrate Pallio, Rita Alloro, Dario Raimondo, Fabio Pace, and et al. 2021. "Microbiota Gut–Brain Axis in Ischemic Stroke: A Narrative Review with a Focus about the Relationship with Inflammatory Bowel Disease" Life 11, no. 7: 715. https://doi.org/10.3390/life11070715

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop