Mapping and Clustering Analysis on Environmental, Social and Governance Field a Bibliometric Analysis Using Scopus
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
2.1. Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG)
2.2. Why Bibliometric Analysis?
- Citation and Co-citation analysis.
- Bibliographical coupling.
- Keyword co-occurrence analysis
3. Methods
3.1. Database Choice and Search Terms
3.2. Data Cleaning
3.3. Indicators
3.4. Software and Technique
4. Result
4.1. Publication Trend
4.2. Leading Countries in ESG Research
4.3. Country Bibliographic Coupling
4.4. Authors Bibliographic Coupling
4.5. Most Productive Journal
4.6. Most Influential Publications Ranked by Number of Citations
4.7. Most Productive Authors
4.8. Keyword Co-Occurrence
4.9. Dynamic Topic Model
5. Conclusions and Discussion
6. Limitations and Future Work
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Ding, W.; Levine, R.; Lin, C.; Xie, W. Corporate immunity to the COVID-19 pandemic. J. Financ. Econ. 2021, 141, 802–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gary, S.N. Best Interests in the Long Term: Fiduciary Duties and ESG Integration. SSRN Electron. J. 2019, 90, 731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Claessens, S. Corporate Governance and Development. World Bank Res. Obs. 2006, 21, 91–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kostant, P.C. Exit, voice and loyalty in the course of corporate governance and counsel’s changing role. J. Socio-Econ. 1999, 28, 203–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, C.; Ma, Y.; Su, D. Corporate governance and firm efficiency: Evidence from China’s publicly listed firms. Manag. Decis. Econ. 2009, 30, 193–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Friede, G.; Busch, T.; Bassen, A. ESG and financial performance: Aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. J. Sustain. Financ. Invest. 2015, 5, 210–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Nollet, J.; Filis, G.; Mitrokostas, E. Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: A non-linear and disaggregated approach. Econ. Model. 2016, 52, 400–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Duque-Grisales, E.; Aguilera-Caracuel, J. Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Scores and Financial Performance of Multilatinas: Moderating Effects of Geographic International Diversification and Financial Slack. J. Bus. Ethics 2021, 168, 315–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sassen, R.; Hinze, A.K.; Hardeck, I. Impact of ESG factors on firm risk in Europe. J. Bus. Econ. 2016, 86, 867–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Giese, G.; Lee, L.E.; Melas, D.; Nagy, Z.; Nishikawa, L. Foundations of ESG Investing: How ESG Affects Equity Valuation, Risk, and Performance. J. Portf. Manag. 2019, 45, 69–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amel-Zadeh, A.; Serafeim, G. Why and How Investors Use ESG Information: Evidence from a Global Survey. Financ. Anal. J. 2018, 74, 87–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Heyduk, R.G.; Fenigstein, A. Influential works and authors in psychology: A survey of eminent psychologists. Am. Psychol. 1984, 39, 556–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fagerberg, J.; Fosaas, M.; Sapprasert, K. Innovation: Exploring the knowledge base. Res. Policy 2012, 41, 1132–1153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, K.R. 10 years of innovation studies in Asia through the Asian Journal of Technology Innovation. Asian J. Technol. Innov. 2014, 22, 168–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rashid, Y.; Waseem, A.; Akbar, A.A.; Azam, F. Value co-creation and social media. Eur. Bus. Rev. 2019, 31, 761–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brooks, C.; Oikonomou, I. The effects of environmental, social and governance disclosures and performance on firm value: A review of the literature in accounting and finance. Br. Account. Rev. 2018, 50, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, K.H.; Cin, B.C.; Lee, E.Y. Environmental Responsibility and Firm Performance: The Application of an Environmental, Social and Governance Model. Bus. Strateg. Environ. 2016, 25, 40–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aguilera, R.V.; Rupp, D.E.; Williams, C.A.; Ganapathi, J. Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations. Acad. Manag. Rev. 2007, 32, 836–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Buallay, A.; Al-Ajmi, J.; Barone, E. Sustainability engagement’s impact on tourism sector performance: Linear and nonlinear models. J. Organ. Chang. Manag. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Imran Ahmed, S.; Farrukh, M.; Yihua, W.; Trunk, N. Human systems management: A retrospective of 40 years. Hum Syst Manag. 2021, 41, 15–30. [Google Scholar]
- Farrukh, M.; Meng, F.; Raza, A.; Tahir, M.S. Twenty-seven years of Sustainable Development Journal: A bibliometric analysis. Sustain. Dev. 2020, 28, 1725–1737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Farrukh, M.; Meng, F.; Wu, Y.; Nawaz, K. Twenty-eight years of business strategy and the environment research: A bibliometric analysis. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2020, 29, 2572–2582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hassan, A.N. Discrimination of ECG signal based on S-interpolation and Quantum Neural Network. Ann. Trop. Med. Public Heal. 2020, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nawaz, K.; Aslam, T.; Saeed, H.A. A Bibliometric Analysis of International Journal of Sports Marketing & Sponsorship. Int. J. Bus. Psychol. 2020, 2, 45–60. [Google Scholar]
- Nawaz, K.; Saeed, H.A.; Sajeel, T.A. Covid-19 and the State of Research from the Perspective of Psychology. Int. J. Bus. Psychol. [Internet] 2020, 2, 35–44. [Google Scholar]
- Farrukh, M.; Raza, A.; Meng, F.; Wu, Y. CMS at 13: A retrospective of the journey. Chin. Manag. Stud. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aksnes, D.W.; Sivertsen, G. A Criteria-based Assessment of the Coverage of Scopus and Web of Science. J. Data Inf. Sci. 2019, 4, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Farhan, M.; Iqbal, M.K. Twenty Years of Sustainable Supply Chain: Past Trends and Future Research suggestions. Int. J. Bus. Psychol. 2021, 3, 1–16. [Google Scholar]
- Farrukh, M.; Shahzad, I.A.; Meng, F.; Wu, Y.; Raza, A. Three decades of research in the technology analysis & strategic management: A bibliometrics analysis. Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag. [Internet] 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Eck, N.J.; Waltman, L. How to normalize cooccurrence data? An analysis of some well-known similarity measures. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 2009, 60, 1635–1651. [Google Scholar]
- Allaire, J. RStudio: Integrated Development Environment for R; Boston, MA, USA, 2012; Volume 770, p. 394. Available online: https://www.r-project.org/conferences/useR-2011/abstracts/180111-allairejj.pdf (accessed on 24 June 2021).
- Tarmuji, I.; Maelah, R.; Tarmuji, N.H. The Impact of Environmental, Social and Governance Practices (ESG) on Economic Performance: Evidence from ESG Score. Int. J. Trade Econ. Financ. 2016, 7, 67–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kotula, T. ESG and Financial Returns: The Academic Perspective. 2019. Available online: www.axa-im-usa.com/content/-/asset_publisher/xnQOfhEPDlxp/content/esg-and-financial-returns-the-academic-perspective/23818 (accessed on 24 June 2021).
- Gu, Z.; Meng, F.; Farrukh, M. Mapping the Research on Knowledge Transfer: A Scientometrics Approach. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 34647–34659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eccles, R.G.; Serafeim, G.; Seth, D.; Ming, C.C.Y. The Performance Frontier: Innovating for a Sustainable Strategy: Interaction. Harv. Bus. Rev. 2013, 91, 17–18. [Google Scholar]
- Luo, X.; Bhattacharya, C.B. Corporate social responsibility, customer satisfaction, and market value. J. Mark. 2006, 70, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Skarmeas, D.; Leonidou, C.N. When consumers doubt, Watch out! The role of CSR skepticism. J. Bus. Res. 2013, 66, 1831–1838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, M. Corporate governance, ESG, and stock returns around the world. Financ. Anal. J. 2019, 75, 103–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- McWilliams, A.; Siegel, D.S.; Wright, P.M. Corporate Social Responsibility: Strategic Implications. J. Manag. Stud. 2006, 43, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Peng, X.E.; Liang, C. Before nonprofit organisations become social enterprises. Volunt. Int. J. Volunt. Nonprofit Organ. 2019, 30, 460–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Escrig-Olmedo, E.; Fernández-Izquierdo, M.; Ferrero-Ferrero, I.; Rivera-Lirio, J.; Muñoz-Torres, M. Rating the Raters: Evaluating how ESG Rating Agencies Integrate Sustainability Principles. Sustainability 2019, 11, 915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Verheyden, T.; Eccles, R.G.; Feiner, A. ESG for all? The impact of ESG screening on return, risk, and diversification. J. Appl. Corp. Financ. 2016, 28, 47–55. [Google Scholar]
- Drei, A.; Guenedal, T.L.; Lepetit, F.; Mortier, V.; Roncalli, T.; Sekine, T. ESG Investing in Recent Years: New Insights from Old Challenges. 2019. Available online: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3683469 (accessed on 24 June 2021).
- Fatemi, A.; Glaum, M.; Kaiser, S. ESG performance and firm value: The moderating role of disclosure. Glob. Financ. J. 2018, 38, 45–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eccles, R.G.; Stroehle, J.C. Exploring Social Origins in the Construction of ESG Measures. 2018. Available online: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3212685 (accessed on 24 June 2021).
- Li, F.; Polychronopoulos, A. What a difference an ESG ratings provider makes. Res. Affil. 2020. Available online: https//www.Res.com/documents/770-what-a-difference-an-esg-ratings-provider-makes.pdf (accessed on 24 June 2021).
Year | No. of Publications | Citations |
---|---|---|
2020 | 243 | 497 |
2019 | 132 | 701 |
2018 | 80 | 982 |
2017 | 50 | 981 |
2016 | 42 | 980 |
2015 | 38 | 1076 |
2014 | 24 | 1268 |
2013 | 19 | 283 |
2012 | 20 | 87 |
2011 | 12 | 109 |
2010 | 9 | 93 |
2009 | 2 | 6 |
2008 | 5 | 75 |
2007 | 2 | 25 |
2006 | 2 | 0 |
2005 | 1 | 0 |
2004 | 3 | 0 |
2003 | 0 | 0 |
2002 | 0 | 0 |
2001 | 0 | 0 |
2000 | 0 | 0 |
1999 | 0 | 0 |
1998 | 0 | 0 |
1997 | 0 | 0 |
1996 | 0 | 0 |
1995 | 0 | 0 |
1994 | 0 | 0 |
1993 | 0 | 0 |
1992 | 0 | 0 |
1991 | 0 | 0 |
1990 | 2 | 59 |
Rank | Country | Documents | Citations | AC/D |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | USA | 228 | 1657 | 7.267 |
2 | UK | 124 | 596 | 4.806 |
3 | France | 80 | 348 | 4.350 |
4 | Australia | 74 | 542 | 7.324 |
5 | Germany | 73 | 855 | 11.712 |
6 | Italy | 68 | 211 | 3.103 |
7 | Canada | 59 | 275 | 4.661 |
8 | Spain | 50 | 296 | 5.920 |
9 | Malaysia | 39 | 36 | 0.923 |
10 | India | 36 | 74 | 2.056 |
11 | Netherlands | 26 | 109 | 4.192 |
12 | China | 21 | 15 | 0.714 |
13 | Brazil | 20 | 126 | 6.300 |
14 | Japan | 20 | 60 | 3.000 |
15 | South Korea | 20 | 29 | 1.450 |
16 | Switzerland | 19 | 109 | 5.7372 |
17 | Ukraine | 19 | 0 | 0 |
18 | South Africa | 18 | 153 | 8.500 |
19 | Sweden | 18 | 71 | 3.944 |
20 | Romania | 16 | 12 | 0.750 |
Journals | Documents | Citations |
---|---|---|
Journal of sustainable finance and investment | 50 | 398 |
Business strategy and the environment | 34 | 716 |
Journal of business ethics | 24 | 633 |
Corporate social responsibility and environmental management | 21 | 333 |
Journal of portfolio management | 21 | 38 |
Journal of cleaner production | 15 | 380 |
Journal of asset management | 14 | 109 |
Critical studies on corporate responsibility, governance and sustainability | 12 | 29 |
Journal of investing | 12 | 17 |
Finance research letters | 11 | 27 |
Social responsibility journal | 9 | 61 |
Sustainability accounting, management and policy journal | 9 | 173 |
Journal of corporate finance | 8 | 166 |
Sustainable investing: a path to a new horizon | 8 | 0 |
Journal of business research | 7 | 98 |
Journal of index investing | 7 | 8 |
Accounting and finance | 6 | 23 |
Corporate governance (bingley) | 6 | 23 |
Corporate governance: an international review | 6 | 92 |
Global finance journal | 6 | 102 |
Title | Journal | Year | Total Citation |
---|---|---|---|
Corporate social responsibility and access to finance | Strategic Management Journal | 2014 | 721 |
ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 | Journal of Sustainable Finance and | 2015 | 234 |
empirical studies | Investment | ||
Socially responsible funds and market crises | Journal of Banking and Finance | 2014 | 122 |
Investigating the relationship of sustainable supply chain management with corporate financial performance | International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management | 2013 | 109 |
Integrated reporting in South Africa in 2012: Perspectives from South African institutional investors | Meditari Accountancy Research | 2015 | 103 |
Corporate social responsibility governance, outcomes, and financial performance | Journal of Cleaner Production | 2017 | 95 |
Environmental responsibility and firm performance: The application of an Environmental, Social and Governance Model | Business Strategy and the Environment | 2016 | 95 |
Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: A non-linear and disaggregated approach | Economic Modelling | 2016 | 92 |
The effects of environmental, social and governance disclosures and performance on firm value: A review of the literature in accounting and finance | British Accounting Review | 2018 | 87 |
Diversity of Board of Directors and Environmental Social Governance: Evidence from Italian Listed Companies | Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management | 2018 | 82 |
Sustainable Development and Financial Markets: Old Paths and New Avenues | Business and Society | 2016 | 82 |
Corporate Sustainable Development: Is ’Integrated Reporting’ a Legitimation Strategy? | Business Strategy and the Environment | 2016 | 81 |
Commitment Strategies for Sustainability: How Business Firms Can Transform Trade-Offs Into Win-Win Outcomes | Business Strategy and the Environment | 2014 | 81 |
The impact of strategic relevance and assurance of sustainability indicators on investors’ decisions | Auditing | 2015 | 80 |
The impact of environmental, social, and governance disclosure on firm value: The role of CEO power | British Accounting Review | 2018 | 79 |
ESG performance and firm value: The moderating role of disclosure | Global Finance Journal | 2018 | 71 |
The effects of board characteristics and sustainable compensation policy on carbon performance of UK firms | British Accounting Review | 2017 | 64 |
Integrating Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Disclosure for a Sustainable Development: An Australian Study | Business Strategy and the | 2017 | 63 |
Environment | |||
ESG Integration and the Investment Management Process: Fundamental Investing Reinvented | Journal of Business Ethics | 2016 | 63 |
Corporate social responsibility and Eurozone corporate bonds: The moderating role of country sustainability | Journal of Banking and Finance | 2015 | 63 |
Rank | Author | Documents | Citations | C/D |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Hebb T. | 10 | 100 | 10.00 |
2 | Dorfleitner G. | 6 | 101 | 16.83 |
3 | Serafeim G. | 6 | 788 | 131.33 |
4 | Buallay A. | 5 | 14 | 2.80 |
5 | Crifo P. | 5 | 95 | 19.00 |
6 | Escrig-Olmedo E. | 5 | 90 | 18.00 |
7 | Muñoz-Torres M.J. | 5 | 72 | 14.40 |
8 | Rezaee Z. | 5 | 136 | 27.20 |
9 | Utz S. | 5 | 46 | 9.20 |
10 | Cucari N. | 4 | 109 | 27.25 |
11 | Eccles R.G. | 4 | 20 | 5.00 |
12 | FernÁNdez-Izquierdo M.Á. | 4 | 41 | 10.25 |
13 | Giamporcaro S. | 4 | 9 | 2.25 |
14 | Krosinsky C. | 4 | 1 | 0.25 |
15 | Lee L.-E. | 4 | 15 | 3.75 |
16 | Managi S. | 4 | 58 | 14.50 |
17 | Melas D. | 4 | 16 | 4.00 |
18 | Nagy Z. | 4 | 16 | 4.00 |
19 | Uyar A. | 4 | 24 | 6.00 |
20 | Arayssi M. | 3 | 74 | 24.67 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Gao, S.; Meng, F.; Gu, Z.; Liu, Z.; Farrukh, M. Mapping and Clustering Analysis on Environmental, Social and Governance Field a Bibliometric Analysis Using Scopus. Sustainability 2021, 13, 7304. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137304
Gao S, Meng F, Gu Z, Liu Z, Farrukh M. Mapping and Clustering Analysis on Environmental, Social and Governance Field a Bibliometric Analysis Using Scopus. Sustainability. 2021; 13(13):7304. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137304
Chicago/Turabian StyleGao, Shang, Fanchen Meng, Zhouyang Gu, Zhiyuan Liu, and Muhammad Farrukh. 2021. "Mapping and Clustering Analysis on Environmental, Social and Governance Field a Bibliometric Analysis Using Scopus" Sustainability 13, no. 13: 7304. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137304
APA StyleGao, S., Meng, F., Gu, Z., Liu, Z., & Farrukh, M. (2021). Mapping and Clustering Analysis on Environmental, Social and Governance Field a Bibliometric Analysis Using Scopus. Sustainability, 13(13), 7304. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137304