Next Article in Journal
An Entropy-Based Approach to Model Selection with Application to Single-Cell Time-Stamped Snapshot Data
Previous Article in Journal
Workload of Queueing Systems with Autocorrelated Service Times
Previous Article in Special Issue
Dynamics of Aggregation in Systems of Self-Propelled Rods
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Matter-Aggregating Systems at a Classical vs. Quantum Interface

Group of Modeling of Physicochemical Processes, Institute of Mathematics and Physics, Faculty of Chemical Technology and Engineering, Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology, 85-796 Bydgoszcz, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Entropy 2025, 27(3), 273; https://doi.org/10.3390/e27030273
Submission received: 27 February 2025 / Accepted: 2 March 2025 / Published: 6 March 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Matter-Aggregating Systems at a Classical vs. Quantum Interface)
This editorial refers to the contents of the eight papers published under a common flagship of matter-aggregating systems at a classical vs. quantum interface. Seven out of eight papers are collected in the Special Issue (SI) (https://www.mdpi.com/journal/entropy/special_issues/matter_aggreg, accessed on 27 February 2025), while the eighth, albeit formally not included, is inevitably related to the topical survey presented in the current SI; thus, it ultimately deserves, without a doubt, its intentional inclusion in the SI.
In the underlying Special Issue (SI), covering a very extensive topical survey of matter-aggregating systems across diverse physical space, time, object-size, and energy scales (see https://www.mdpi.com/journal/entropy/special_issues/matter_aggreg), one may directly jump into the items listed below and presented in Table 1 to summarize the main message addressed by the SI.
The topical range of contributions to this SI on matter-aggregating systems at a classical-quantum realm are broad, and can be figuratively described as polydispersive, in terms of the multitude of the physical scales uncovered, as well as in how they delve, if at all, into the passage between classical and quantum physical descriptions/approaches, meeting at the nanoscale, thus, at the objects’ characteristic dimensions of 10 hydrogen atoms (when “glued” together linearly one by one) up to a hundred of nm, ultimately.
The nanoscale per se (1–100 nm) has been typified as a nexus between the classically uncovered physical principles of the macroscale matter aggregation—based on non-equilibrium statistical thermodynamics—as having implicitly involved a) Newton’s laws, somehow (seemingly) hidden behind the molecular-dynamics experiments [1], and b) quantum-mechanics’ subtle, albeit unintuitive, reasoning, expressed (for simplicity and brevity) by the quantum-size effect, assigned to low-dimensional (Van der Waals-type) heterostructures [2].
The so-called conundrum of each matter-aggregation physical description appears to be a puzzle, at which point a scale is designated to commence effectively, whether this begins at a mesoscale (typically) or at one of the two adjacent scales, namely either at the macroscale (see item H from column #1 of Table 1) or at its microscale counterpart [3] (see items D, F, G from column #1 of Table 1, all included in the SI).
In Table 1, one can find mesoscopic but toward-quantum-interface-oriented approaches (see items, A–C and E) that unveil dynamics of soft matter and biomatter systems in a granules-involving and orderly manner (items A and B), as well as approaches expressing a biophysical point-of-view on matter aggregation (with a Fokker-Planck and Smoluchowski-type picture behind it), with virtual symmetry-breaking and chaotic behaviors involved (cf. C and E from Table 1, respectively). In particular, one can plunge into a numerical-simulation demonstration of an advanced but practical algorithmic analysis (based on recurrence plots and time series) of seed mucilage data (item E in Table 1) that reveal features of the system’s dynamics, namely, temperature-dependent regions with different dynamics concerning hydrogen bonds, and regions of stable oscillation of increments of several hydrophobic–polar interactions [4].
It is also worth noting that a certain concise-in-form forerunner of this SI appeared in the same Journal as a commentary in early 2023, cf. [5], and is referenced therein.
To summarize, this SI, as briefly presented in Table 1, has primarily focused on a very exhaustive topical survey, touching upon principles of matter aggregation, through their physically relevant size, length, time, and energy, as well as interactions scales. The range of topics addressed in the SI (see also ref. [6]) present a very expanded field, from the early universe to complex organisms (cf., review C in Table 1). In addition, the collected material of the SI can provoke us to foresee that a continuation of these studies, due to presumptions of improper statistical-mechanical incoherent mixing and the inclusion of many-body intermolecular (or, interatomic) interactions, ought to take into account principles of non-extensive thermodynamics (cf. an overview [7]).
To recap concisely, matter aggregation and cluster–cluster formation play a crucial role in the transition from classical to quantum stochastic description, ultimately leading to the formation of nanostructures with reduced dimensionality. This process involves several key mechanisms and phenomena, such as chaotic and quantized reaction pathways, Markov state (or, non-Markovian [8]) models, and/or Ising-type model analogies, as studied by the Monte Carlo method [9], with a plausible temperature- and interaction-type-dependent (also, memory-involving) classical vs. quantum excursion toward nonequilibria [10].

Acknowledgments

Let us acknowledge the very helpful assistance of Editorial Assistants and advisors from the Journal, balancing in some way the strict (new) publishing policy criteria met by the present Guest Editor. It is appropriate to mention those (anonymous) fellows who started to contribute to the SI but failed partly because of an influence of the same reasons invoked.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

List of Contributions

A.
Gadomski, A. (Nano)Granules-Involving Aggregation at a Passage to the Nanoscale as Viewed in Terms of a Diffusive Heisenberg Relation. Entropy 2024, 26, 76. https://doi.org/10.3390/e26010076.
B.
Siódmiak, J. (Non)Resonance Bonds in Molecular Dynamics Simulations: A Case Study Concerning C60 Fullerenes. Entropy 2024, 26, 214. https://doi.org/10.3390/e26030214.
C.
Arango-Restrepo, A.; Rubi, J. M. Thermodynamic Insights into Symmetry Breaking: Exploring Energy Dissipation across Diverse Scales. Entropy 2024, 26, 231. https://doi.org/10.3390/e26030231.
D.
Crisanti, A.; Salasnich, L.; Sarracino, A.; Zannetti, M. Canonical vs. Grand Canonical Ensemble for Bosonic Gases under Harmonic Confinement. Entropy 2024, 26, 367. https://doi.org/10.3390/e26050367.
E.
Sionkowski, P.; Kruszewska, N.; Kreitschitz, A.; Gorb, S.N.; Domino, K. Application of Recurrence Plot Analysis to Examine Dynamics of Biological Molecules on the Example of Aggregation of Seed Mucilage Components. Entropy 2024, 26, 380. https://doi.org/10.3390/e26050380.
F.
Cerdeiriña, C. A.; Troncoso, J. Ising Paradigm in Isobaric Ensembles. Entropy 2024, 26, 438. https://doi.org/10.3390/e26060438.
G.
Dajka, J. Interference of Particles with Fermionic Internal Degrees of Freedom. Entropy 2024, 26, 449. https://doi.org/10.3390/e26060449.
H.
Löffler, R. J. G.; Gorecki, J. Dynamics of Aggregation in Systems of Self-Propelled Rods. Entropy 2024, 26, 980. https://doi.org/10.3390/e26110980.

References

  1. Hansen, J.P.; Ian McDonald, R. Theory of Simple Liquids; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1976. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bawendi, M.G.; Steigerwald, M.L.; Brus, L.E. The Quantum Mechanics of Larger Semiconductor Clusters (“Quantum Dots”). Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 1990, 41, 477–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Schmelzer, J.; Roepke, G.; Mahnke, R. Aggregation Phenomena in Complex Systems; Wiley: Weinheim, Germany, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  4. Sionkowski, P.; Kruszewska, N.; Kreitschitz, A.; Gorb, S.N.; Domino, K. Application of Recurrence Plot Analysis to Examine Dynamics of Biological Molecules on the Example of Aggregation of Seed Mucilage Components. Entropy 2024, 26, 380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Gadomski, A.; Kruszewska, N. Matter-Aggregating Low-Dimensional Nanostructures at the Edge of the Classical vs. Quantum Realm. Entropy 2023, 25, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Arango-Restrepo, A.; Torrenegra-Rico, J.D.; Rubi, J.M. Entropy Production in a System of Janus Particles. Entropy 2025, 27, 112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Boon, J.P.; Tsallis, C. Nonextensive Statistical Mechanics: New Trends, New Perspectives. Europhys. News 2005, 36, 185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Łuczka, J.; Niemiec, M.; Rudnicki, R. Kinetics of Growth Process Controlled by Convective Fluctuations. Phys. Rev. E 2002, 65, 051401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Binder, K. Statistical Mechanics of Finite Three-Dimensional Ising Models. Phys. A 1972, 62, 508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Spiechowicz, J.; Marchenko, I.G.; Hänggi, P.; Łuczka, J. Diffusion Coefficient of a Brownian Particle in Equilibrium and Nonequilibrium: Einstein Model and Beyond. Entropy 2023, 25, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table 1. In the table, in column #1, the topics covered by the SI are listed in their order of appearance (cf. List of Contributions). In column #2, the main keyword is assigned to the corresponding topic, whereas in column #3, the basic signature of the classical vs. quantum passage is included.
Table 1. In the table, in column #1, the topics covered by the SI are listed in their order of appearance (cf. List of Contributions). In column #2, the main keyword is assigned to the corresponding topic, whereas in column #3, the basic signature of the classical vs. quantum passage is included.
#1#2#3
A/(Nano)Granules-Involving AggregationNanoscale quantum-size effectHeisenberg uncertainty relation
B/Molecular Dynamics Simulations of C60 Fullerenes(Non)resonance bondsElectron delocalization between different atoms within a molecule
C/Symmetry-Breaking Exploring Energy Dissipation across Diverse Aggregation Scales (review)Emergence of life in complex systems and organismsEnantiomeric amino acids and proteins, and their aggregates
D/Bosonic Gases under Harmonic ConfinementCanonical vs. grand canonical ensembleBose–Einstein condensation
E/Aggregation of Seed Mucilage ComponentsRecurrence plots uncovering dynamics of biological moleculesNon-covalent interactions and bonding
F/Ising Paradigm in Isobaric Ensembles (review)Local entropic effectsCompressible spin cells
G/Particles with Fermionic Internal Degrees of FreedomMach–Zehnder interferometer and Hubbard dimerInterference of fermionic-type particles
H/Aggregation in Systems of Self-Propelled RodsLow-symmetry interaction between rodsDynamics of self-propelled rods as resembling a vortex involving boson systems behavior
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gadomski, A.; Kruszewska, N. Matter-Aggregating Systems at a Classical vs. Quantum Interface. Entropy 2025, 27, 273. https://doi.org/10.3390/e27030273

AMA Style

Gadomski A, Kruszewska N. Matter-Aggregating Systems at a Classical vs. Quantum Interface. Entropy. 2025; 27(3):273. https://doi.org/10.3390/e27030273

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gadomski, Adam, and Natalia Kruszewska. 2025. "Matter-Aggregating Systems at a Classical vs. Quantum Interface" Entropy 27, no. 3: 273. https://doi.org/10.3390/e27030273

APA Style

Gadomski, A., & Kruszewska, N. (2025). Matter-Aggregating Systems at a Classical vs. Quantum Interface. Entropy, 27(3), 273. https://doi.org/10.3390/e27030273

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop