Next Article in Journal
Hybrid CUSUM Change Point Test for Time Series with Time-Varying Volatilities Based on Support Vector Regression
Next Article in Special Issue
Professional or Amateur? The Phonological Output Buffer as a Working Memory Operator
Previous Article in Journal
Two-Dimensional Permutation Vectors’ (PV) Code for Optical Code Division Multiple Access Systems
Previous Article in Special Issue
What Limits Our Capacity to Process Nested Long-Range Dependencies in Sentence Comprehension?

Working Memory Training: Assessing the Efficiency of Mnemonic Strategies

Cognitive Neuroscience, Scuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi Avanzati, I-34136 Trieste, Italy
Scuola Peripatetica d’Arte Mnemonica (S.P.A.M.), 10125 Turin, Italy
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Current address: Center for Theoretical Neuroscience, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA.
Entropy 2020, 22(5), 577;
Received: 6 April 2020 / Revised: 9 May 2020 / Accepted: 18 May 2020 / Published: 20 May 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue What Limits Working Memory Performance?)
Recently, there has been increasing interest in techniques for enhancing working memory (WM), casting a new light on the classical picture of a rigid system. One reason is that WM performance has been associated with intelligence and reasoning, while its impairment showed correlations with cognitive deficits, hence the possibility of training it is highly appealing. However, results on WM changes following training are controversial, leaving it unclear whether it can really be potentiated. This study aims at assessing changes in WM performance by comparing it with and without training by a professional mnemonist. Two groups, experimental and control, participated in the study, organized in two phases. In the morning, both groups were familiarized with stimuli through an N-back task, and then attended a 2-hour lecture. For the experimental group, the lecture, given by the mnemonist, introduced memory encoding techniques; for the control group, it was a standard academic lecture about memory systems. In the afternoon, both groups were administered five tests, in which they had to remember the position of 16 items, when asked in random order. The results show much better performance in trained subjects, indicating the need to consider such possibility of enhancement, alongside general information-theoretic constraints, when theorizing about WM span. View Full-Text
Keywords: working memory; mnemonic strategies; complex span; memory training working memory; mnemonic strategies; complex span; memory training
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Di Santo, S.; De Luca, V.; Isaja, A.; Andreetta, S. Working Memory Training: Assessing the Efficiency of Mnemonic Strategies. Entropy 2020, 22, 577.

AMA Style

Di Santo S, De Luca V, Isaja A, Andreetta S. Working Memory Training: Assessing the Efficiency of Mnemonic Strategies. Entropy. 2020; 22(5):577.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Di Santo, Serena; De Luca, Vanni; Isaja, Alessio; Andreetta, Sara. 2020. "Working Memory Training: Assessing the Efficiency of Mnemonic Strategies" Entropy 22, no. 5: 577.

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Search more from Scilit
Back to TopTop