Next Article in Journal
A Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Techniques for Muon Count in UHECR Extensive Air-Showers
Next Article in Special Issue
Ultracold Bosons on a Regular Spherical Mesh
Previous Article in Journal
Analytical Analysis of Heat Transfer and Entropy Generation in a Tube Filled with Double-Layer Porous Media
Previous Article in Special Issue
Entropy Multiparticle Correlation Expansion for a Crystal
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Structural and Thermodynamic Peculiarities of Core-Shell Particles at Fluid Interfaces from Triangular Lattice Models

Entropy 2020, 22(11), 1215; https://doi.org/10.3390/e22111215
by Vera Grishina 1, Vyacheslav Vikhrenko 1 and Alina Ciach 2,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Entropy 2020, 22(11), 1215; https://doi.org/10.3390/e22111215
Submission received: 12 September 2020 / Revised: 21 October 2020 / Accepted: 22 October 2020 / Published: 26 October 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Statistical Mechanics and Thermodynamics of Liquids and Crystals)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

See the attached.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please, see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors present results for a 2D lattice model inspired by core-shell nanoparticles (NPs) at an interface.  The potential energy between sites incorporates two-scale repulsion (driven shell-shell and core-core interactions) and longer range attraction due to capillary forces. The authors calculate thermodynamic quantities for both open and closed ensembles at T=0, varying key interactions parameters, and carry out MC simulations at finite T, reporting phase diagrams and data on thermodynamic response functions, where the ordered phases are based on a 9-site unit cell.  The work builds on previous 1-D and 2-D modelling of the system.

I have not checked details of the calculations.

The work should be of interest to both researchers interested in understanding the phase behaviour of NPs at interfaces, and those interested in lattice models inter own right, perhaps for pedagogical reasons.  I recommend publication.

Minor points

line 116-177 "J2 and J5 are dimensionless ... energies in unit of ... J"  This sentence appears contradictory.  J2 and J5 are dimensionless.  J has units of energy.  Please reword. 

line 124.  Please explain in detail why only including up to the 5th nn interactions implies that only the 9-site unit cell needs to be considered. 

line 176  looses -> loses

Author Response

Please, see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop