Entropy? Exercices de Style
AbstractSince its inception, the concept of entropy has been known under a variety of guises and been used in an increasing number of contexts, achieving an almost rock star-like status in both the sciences and popular culture. The three most prominent “styles” which entropy has been (re)told in and which have determined its popularity are the thermodynamic, statistical and information-theoretic one, owing much to the work of Clausius, Boltzmann and Gibbs, and Shannon, respectively. In the relentless hunt for the core of the concept that spurred this development, connections with irreversibility and emergence of time, nature of probability and information emerged adding to its elusiveness as much as stimulating its proliferation and cross-contextual adoption. In this historical review, we retrace, through primary and secondary sources, the three main perspectives from which entropy has been regarded, emphasising the motivations behind each new version, their ramifications and the bridges that have been constructed to justify them. From this analysis of the foundations a number of characteristic traits of the concept emerge that underline its exceptionality as an engine of conceptual progress. View Full-Text
Share & Cite This Article
Gaudenzi, R. Entropy? Exercices de Style. Entropy 2019, 21, 742.
Gaudenzi R. Entropy? Exercices de Style. Entropy. 2019; 21(8):742.Chicago/Turabian Style
Gaudenzi, Rocco. 2019. "Entropy? Exercices de Style." Entropy 21, no. 8: 742.
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.