Next Article in Journal
Mixed Convective Flow and Heat Transfer of a Dual Stratified Micropolar Fluid Induced by a Permeable Stretching/Shrinking Sheet
Next Article in Special Issue
Bayesian Determination of Parameters for Plasma-Wall Interactions
Previous Article in Journal
Why Does Space Feel the Way it Does? Towards a Principled Account of Spatial Experience
Previous Article in Special Issue
Stochastic Gradient Annealed Importance Sampling for Efficient Online Marginal Likelihood Estimation
Open AccessArticle

TI-Stan: Model Comparison Using Thermodynamic Integration and HMC

Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Mississippi, University, MS 38677, USA
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Entropy 2019, 21(12), 1161;
Received: 30 September 2019 / Revised: 25 November 2019 / Accepted: 25 November 2019 / Published: 27 November 2019
We present a novel implementation of the adaptively annealed thermodynamic integration technique using Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (HMC). Thermodynamic integration with importance sampling and adaptive annealing is an especially useful method for estimating model evidence for problems that use physics-based mathematical models. Because it is based on importance sampling, this method requires an efficient way to refresh the ensemble of samples. Existing successful implementations use binary slice sampling on the Hilbert curve to accomplish this task. This implementation works well if the model has few parameters or if it can be broken into separate parts with identical parameter priors that can be refreshed separately. However, for models that are not separable and have many parameters, a different method for refreshing the samples is needed. HMC, in the form of the MC-Stan package, is effective for jointly refreshing the ensemble under a high-dimensional model. MC-Stan uses automatic differentiation to compute the gradients of the likelihood that HMC requires in about the same amount of time as it computes the likelihood function itself, easing the programming burden compared to implementations of HMC that require explicitly specified gradient functions. We present a description of the overall TI-Stan procedure and results for representative example problems. View Full-Text
Keywords: model comparison; MCMC; thermodynamic Integration; HMC model comparison; MCMC; thermodynamic Integration; HMC
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Henderson, R.W.; Goggans, P.M. TI-Stan: Model Comparison Using Thermodynamic Integration and HMC. Entropy 2019, 21, 1161.

AMA Style

Henderson RW, Goggans PM. TI-Stan: Model Comparison Using Thermodynamic Integration and HMC. Entropy. 2019; 21(12):1161.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Henderson, R. W.; Goggans, Paul M. 2019. "TI-Stan: Model Comparison Using Thermodynamic Integration and HMC" Entropy 21, no. 12: 1161.

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Search more from Scilit
Back to TopTop