Next Article in Journal
Uncertainty Relations for Coarse–Grained Measurements: An Overview
Next Article in Special Issue
On the Geodesic Distance in Shapes K-means Clustering
Previous Article in Journal
Hybrid Newton–Successive Substitution Method for Multiphase Rachford-Rice Equations
Previous Article in Special Issue
Maxwell’s Demon and the Problem of Observers in General Relativity
Article

Entropy and Geometric Objects

ACCESS e.V., Intzestr. 5, D-52072 Aachen, Germany
Entropy 2018, 20(6), 453; https://doi.org/10.3390/e20060453
Received: 27 April 2018 / Revised: 30 May 2018 / Accepted: 5 June 2018 / Published: 9 June 2018
Different notions of entropy can be identified in different scientific communities: (i) the thermodynamic sense; (ii) the information sense; (iii) the statistical sense; (iv) the disorder sense; and (v) the homogeneity sense. Especially the “disorder sense” and the “homogeneity sense” relate to and require the notion of space and time. One of the few prominent examples relating entropy to both geometry and space is the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy of a Black Hole. Although this was developed for describing a physical object—a black hole—having a mass, a momentum, a temperature, an electrical charge, etc., absolutely no information about this object’s attributes can ultimately be found in the final formulation. In contrast, the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy in its dimensionless form is a positive quantity only comprising geometric attributes such as an area A—the area of the event horizon of the black hole, a length LP—the Planck length, and a factor 1/4. A purely geometric approach to this formulation will be presented here. The approach is based on a continuous 3D extension of the Heaviside function which draws on the phase-field concept of diffuse interfaces. Entropy enters into the local and statistical description of contrast or gradient distributions in the transition region of the extended Heaviside function definition. The structure of the Bekenstein-Hawking formulation is ultimately derived for a geometric sphere based solely on geometric-statistical considerations. View Full-Text
Keywords: gradient-entropy; contrast; phase-field models; diffuse interfaces; entropy of geometric objects; Bekenstein-Hawking entropy; Heaviside function; Dirac function; 3D delta function gradient-entropy; contrast; phase-field models; diffuse interfaces; entropy of geometric objects; Bekenstein-Hawking entropy; Heaviside function; Dirac function; 3D delta function
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Schmitz, G.J. Entropy and Geometric Objects. Entropy 2018, 20, 453. https://doi.org/10.3390/e20060453

AMA Style

Schmitz GJ. Entropy and Geometric Objects. Entropy. 2018; 20(6):453. https://doi.org/10.3390/e20060453

Chicago/Turabian Style

Schmitz, Georg J. 2018. "Entropy and Geometric Objects" Entropy 20, no. 6: 453. https://doi.org/10.3390/e20060453

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop