Next Article in Journal
A Co-Opetitive Automated Negotiation Model for Vertical Allied Enterprises Teams and Stakeholders
Next Article in Special Issue
Maximum Entropy Theory of Ecology: A Reply to Harte
Previous Article in Journal
Dimensional Lifting through the Generalized Gram–Schmidt Process
Previous Article in Special Issue
Nonequilibrium Entropic Bounds for Darwinian Replicators
Reply published on 24 April 2018, see Entropy 2018, 20(5), 308.
Comment

Maximum Entropy and Theory Construction: A Reply to Favretti

Energy and Resources Group, and Department of Environmental Science, Policy & Management, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
Entropy 2018, 20(4), 285; https://doi.org/10.3390/e20040285
Received: 26 December 2017 / Revised: 5 March 2018 / Accepted: 5 March 2018 / Published: 14 April 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Entropy and Its Applications across Disciplines)
In the maximum entropy theory of ecology (METE), the form of a function describing the distribution of abundances over species and metabolic rates over individuals in an ecosystem is inferred using the maximum entropy inference procedure. Favretti shows that an alternative maximum entropy model exists that assumes the same prior knowledge and makes predictions that differ from METE’s. He shows that both cannot be correct and asserts that his is the correct one because it can be derived from a classic microstate-counting calculation. I clarify here exactly what the core entities and definitions are for METE, and discuss the relevance of two critical issues raised by Favretti: the existence of a counting procedure for microstates and the choices of definition of the core elements of a theory. I emphasize that a theorist controls how the core entities of his or her theory are defined, and that nature is the final arbiter of the validity of a theory. View Full-Text
Keywords: maximum entropy; ecology; macroecology; abundance; metabolism; ecological theory maximum entropy; ecology; macroecology; abundance; metabolism; ecological theory
MDPI and ACS Style

Harte, J. Maximum Entropy and Theory Construction: A Reply to Favretti. Entropy 2018, 20, 285. https://doi.org/10.3390/e20040285

AMA Style

Harte J. Maximum Entropy and Theory Construction: A Reply to Favretti. Entropy. 2018; 20(4):285. https://doi.org/10.3390/e20040285

Chicago/Turabian Style

Harte, John. 2018. "Maximum Entropy and Theory Construction: A Reply to Favretti" Entropy 20, no. 4: 285. https://doi.org/10.3390/e20040285

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop