Next Article in Journal
On Increased Arc Endurance of the Cu–Cr System Materials
Next Article in Special Issue
The Potential Application of Multiscale Entropy Analysis of Electroencephalography in Children with Neurological and Neuropsychiatric Disorders
Previous Article in Journal
Spurious Memory in Non-Equilibrium Stochastic Models of Imitative Behavior
Previous Article in Special Issue
Cooperative Particle Filtering for Tracking ERP Subcomponents from Multichannel EEG
Article Menu
Issue 8 (August) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Entropy 2017, 19(8), 385;

Noise Robustness Analysis of Performance for EEG-Based Driver Fatigue Detection Using Different Entropy Feature Sets

The Center of Collaboration and Innovation, Jiangxi University of Technology, Nanchang 330098, China
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 16 June 2017 / Revised: 24 July 2017 / Accepted: 25 July 2017 / Published: 27 July 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Entropy and Electroencephalography II)
Full-Text   |   PDF [3612 KB, uploaded 27 July 2017]   |  


Driver fatigue is an important factor in traffic accidents, and the development of a detection system for driver fatigue is of great significance. To estimate and prevent driver fatigue, various classifiers based on electroencephalogram (EEG) signals have been developed; however, as EEG signals have inherent non-stationary characteristics, their detection performance is often deteriorated by background noise. To investigate the effects of noise on detection performance, simulated Gaussian noise, spike noise, and electromyogram (EMG) noise were added into a raw EEG signal. Four types of entropies, including sample entropy (SE), fuzzy entropy (FE), approximate entropy (AE), and spectral entropy (PE), were deployed for feature sets. Three base classifiers (K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Decision Tree (DT)) and two ensemble methods (Bootstrap Aggregating (Bagging) and Boosting) were employed and compared. Results showed that: (1) the simulated Gaussian noise and EMG noise had an impact on accuracy, while simulated spike noise did not, which is of great significance for the future application of driver fatigue detection; (2) the influence on noise performance was different based on each classifier, for example, the robust effect of classifier DT was the best and classifier SVM was the weakest; (3) the influence on noise performance was also different with each feature set where the robustness of feature set FE and the combined feature set were the best; and (4) while the Bagging method could not significantly improve performance against noise addition, the Boosting method may significantly improve performance against superimposed Gaussian and EMG noise. The entropy feature extraction method could not only identify driver fatigue, but also effectively resist noise, which is of great significance in future applications of an EEG-based driver fatigue detection system. View Full-Text
Keywords: driver fatigue; electroencephalogram (EEG); bagging; boosting; entropy driver fatigue; electroencephalogram (EEG); bagging; boosting; entropy

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Hu, J.; Wang, P. Noise Robustness Analysis of Performance for EEG-Based Driver Fatigue Detection Using Different Entropy Feature Sets. Entropy 2017, 19, 385.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Entropy EISSN 1099-4300 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top