Maxwell’s Demon—A Historical Review
Department of Physics, University of Puget Sound, 1500 N Warner St, Tacoma, WA 98416, USA
Academic Editor: Kevin H. Knuth
Entropy 2017, 19(6), 240; https://doi.org/10.3390/e19060240
Received: 20 April 2017 / Revised: 12 May 2017 / Accepted: 19 May 2017 / Published: 23 May 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Limits to the Second Law of Thermodynamics: Experiment and Theory)
For more than 140 years Maxwell’s demon has intrigued, enlightened, mystified, frustrated, and challenged physicists in unique and interesting ways. Maxwell’s original conception was brilliant and insightful, but over the years numerous different versions of Maxwell’s demon have been presented. Most versions have been answered with reasonable physical arguments, with each of these answers (apparently) keeping the second law of thermodynamics intact. Though the laws of physics did not change in this process of questioning and answering, we have learned a lot along the way about statistical mechanics and thermodynamics. This paper will review a selected history and discuss some of the interesting historical characters who have participated. View Full-Text
Keywords: Maxwell’s demon; entropy; Maxwell; second law of thermodynamics; Szilard; information; erasure; Landauer►▼ Show Figures
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited
MDPI and ACS Style
Rex, A. Maxwell’s Demon—A Historical Review. Entropy 2017, 19, 240.
AMA StyleShow more citation formats Show less citations formats
Rex A. Maxwell’s Demon—A Historical Review. Entropy. 2017; 19(6):240.Chicago/Turabian Style
Rex, Andrew. 2017. "Maxwell’s Demon—A Historical Review." Entropy 19, no. 6: 240.
Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.