The Demon in a Vacuum Tube
Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica, Via Fosso del Cavaliere 100, 00133 Roma, Italy
Entropy 2013, 15(5), 1916-1928; https://doi.org/10.3390/e15051916
Received: 23 April 2013 / Revised: 7 May 2013 / Accepted: 17 May 2013 / Published: 21 May 2013
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Maxwell’s Demon 2013)
AbstractIn the present paper, several issues concerning the second law of thermodynamics, Maxwell’s demon and Landauer’s principle are dealt with. I argue that if the demon and the system on which it operates without dissipation of external energy are made of atoms and molecules (gas, liquid or solid) in thermal equilibrium (whose behaviour is described by a canonical distribution), then the unavoidable reason why the demon cannot successfully operate resides in the ubiquity of thermal fluctuations and friction. Landauer’s principle appears to be unnecessary. I also suggest that if the behaviour of the demon and the system on which it acts is not always describable by a canonical distribution, as would happen for instance with the ballistic motion of electrons at early stages of thermionic emission, then a successful working demon cannot be ruled out a priori. A critical review of two recent experiments on thermionic emission Maxwell’s demons is also given. View Full-Text
Keywords: second law of thermodynamics; Maxwell's demon; Landauer's principle;Szilard's engine; thermionic emission; vacuum tube; contact potential; Fu's experiment►▼ Figures
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 3.0).
Share & Cite This Article
MDPI and ACS Style
D'Abramo, G. The Demon in a Vacuum Tube. Entropy 2013, 15, 1916-1928.
D'Abramo G. The Demon in a Vacuum Tube. Entropy. 2013; 15(5):1916-1928.Chicago/Turabian Style
D'Abramo, Germano. 2013. "The Demon in a Vacuum Tube." Entropy 15, no. 5: 1916-1928.
Find Other Styles
For more information on the journal statistics, click here. Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.