Next Article in Journal
Assessing the Buyer Trust and Satisfaction Factors in the E-Marketplace
Previous Article in Journal
Experiment and Analysis for QoS of E-Commerce Systems
 
 
Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research is published by MDPI from Volume 16 Issue 3 (2021). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY 3.0 licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Faculty of Engineering of the Universidad de Talca.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Uncovering the Nature of Information Processing of Men and Women Online: The Comparison of Two Models Using the Think-Aloud Method

1
Marketing Department, ESG-UQAM, Montreal, QC, Canada
2
Marketing Department, HEC Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 2012, 7(2), 106-120; https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-18762012000200010
Submission received: 29 November 2011 / Revised: 9 May 2012 / Accepted: 15 May 2012 / Published: 1 August 2012

Abstract

This paper compares two models predicting gender differences in information processing to determine if either of the models is more pertinent to goal-oriented Internet searches. The Selectivity Model (Meyers-Levy 1989) proposes that women make more comprehension effort than men whereas the Item-Specific/Relational Processing Model (Putrevu 2001) suggests that men and women differ primarily in their processing style, with men tending to use item-specific processing by focusing on product attributes and women tending to use relational processing by looking for interrelationships among multiple pieces of information. The study participants (106 total, 50% female) were asked to think aloud while performing one of two goal-oriented search tasks on a website. Their thoughts were then coded according to relevant categories by two independent analysts using Atlas TI software. Consistent with the Selectivity Model, women made more comprehension effort than did men. However, our hypotheses related to a difference in processing style between men and women received less support. Overall, the results help disentangle the two theories and provide website developers with a basis for creating sites that are suited to men’s and women’s distinctive information processing strategies.
Keywords: selectivity model; item-specific processing; relational processing; gender differences; information processing; online consumer behavior; verbal protocol selectivity model; item-specific processing; relational processing; gender differences; information processing; online consumer behavior; verbal protocol

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Arcand, M.; Nantel, J. Uncovering the Nature of Information Processing of Men and Women Online: The Comparison of Two Models Using the Think-Aloud Method. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 2012, 7, 106-120. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-18762012000200010

AMA Style

Arcand M, Nantel J. Uncovering the Nature of Information Processing of Men and Women Online: The Comparison of Two Models Using the Think-Aloud Method. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research. 2012; 7(2):106-120. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-18762012000200010

Chicago/Turabian Style

Arcand, Manon, and Jacques Nantel. 2012. "Uncovering the Nature of Information Processing of Men and Women Online: The Comparison of Two Models Using the Think-Aloud Method" Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research 7, no. 2: 106-120. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-18762012000200010

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop