Can Influencer Persona Increase the Effectiveness of Social Media Video Ads? The Mediating Effect of Consumer Perceptions of Self
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
2.1. Influencer Marketing and SMIs
2.2. Image Management and SMIs’ Personas
2.3. Effectiveness of Social Media Ads and Influencer Marketing
3. Theoretical Framework and Hypotheses
3.1. Stimulus-Organism-Response (S-O-R) Model
3.2. Personal Values and Charismatic Leadership
3.3. The Mediating Role of Consumer Self-Perceptions
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Data Collection
4.2. Measurement Items
4.3. Features and Measurement Models
4.4. Sample Description
5. Results
5.1. Structural Equation Modeling
5.1.1. Reliability
5.1.2. Validity
5.1.3. Model Fit for the Measurement Model
5.1.4. Validation of Structural Model
5.2. Bootstrap Analysis
5.3. Independent Samples T-Test
6. Discussion
6.1. Key Findings
6.2. Theoretical Contributions
6.3. Practical Contributions
6.4. Limitations and Future Research Directions
7. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Vrontis, D.; Makrides, A.; Christofi, M.; Thrassou, A. Social media influencer marketing: A systematic review, integrative framework and future research agenda. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 2021, 45, 617–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sokolova, K.; Kefi, H. Instagram and YouTube bloggers promote it, why should I buy? How credibility and parasocial interaction influence purchase intentions. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2020, 53, 101742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lamberton, C.; Stephen, A.T. A thematic exploration of digital, social media, and mobile marketing: Research evolution from 2000 to 2015 and an agenda for future inquiry. J. Mark. 2016, 80, 146–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arora, A.; Bansal, S.; Kandpal, C.; Aswani, R.; Dwivedi, Y. Measuring social media influencer index-insights from Facebook, Twitter and Instagram. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2019, 49, 86–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goat. The 61 Crucial Social Media Marketing Statistics You Need to Know in 2024. Available online: https://goatagency.com/blog/social-media-marketing/social-media-marketing-statistics/#social-media-advertising-statistics (accessed on 23 January 2024).
- Forbes ADVISOR. Top Social Media Statistics and Trends of 2024. Available online: https://www.forbes.com/advisor/business/social-media-statistics/#source (accessed on 18 October 2023).
- De Veirman, M.; Cauberghe, V.; Hudders, L. Marketing through Instagram influencers: The impact of number of followers and product divergence on brand attitude. Int. J. Advert. 2017, 36, 798–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, S.; Barnes, L.; McCormick, H.; Cano, M.B. Social media influencers’ narrative strategies to create eWOM: A theoretical contribution. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2021, 59, 102293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, D.Y.; Kim, H.Y. Influencer advertising on social media: The multiple inference model on influencer-product congruence and sponsorship disclosure. J. Bus. Res. 2021, 130, 405–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Casaló, L.V.; Flavián, C.; Ibáñez-Sánchez, S. Influencers on Instagram: Antecedents and consequences of opinion leadership. J. Bus. Res. 2020, 117, 510–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Enke, N.; Borchers, N.S. Social media influencers in strategic communication: A conceptual framework for strategic social media influencer communication. In Social Media Influencers in Strategic Communication, 1st ed.; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2021; pp. 7–23. [Google Scholar]
- Delisle, M.P.; Parmentier, M.A. Navigating person-branding in the fashion blogosphere. J. Glob. Fash. Mark. 2016, 7, 211–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Djafarova, E.; Rushworth, C. Exploring the credibility of online celebrities’ Instagram profiles in influencing the purchase decisions of young female users. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2017, 68, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Malär, L.; Krohmer, H.; Hoyer, W.D.; Nyffenegger, B. Emotional brand attachment and brand personality: The relative importance of the actual and the ideal self. J. Mark. 2011, 75, 35–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- CNNIC. Statistical Report on Internet Development in China 2024. Available online: https://www.cnnic.net.cn/n4/2024/0322/c88-10964.html (accessed on 22 August 2024).
- Ge, J.; Sui, Y.; Zhou, X.; Li, G. Effect of short video ads on sales through social media: The role of advertisement content genera-tors. Int. J. Advert. 2021, 40, 870–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nikolinakou, A.; King, K.W. Viral video ads: Emotional triggers and social media virality. Psychol. Mark. 2018, 35, 715–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Coker, K.K.; Flight, R.L.; Baima, D.M. Skip it or view it: The role of video storytelling in social media marketing. Mark. Manag. J. 2017, 27, 75–87. [Google Scholar]
- Marshall, P.D.; Moore, C.; Barbour, K. Persona as method: Exploring celebrity and the public self through persona studies. Celebr. Stud. 2015, 6, 288–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, S.; Blazquez, M.; McCormick, H.; Barnes, L. How social media influencers’ narrative strategies benefit cultivating influencer marketing: Tackling issues of cultural barriers, commercialised content, and sponsorship disclosure. J. Bus. Res. 2021, 134, 122–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kretz, G.; de Valck, K. “Pixelize me!“: Digital storytelling and the creation of archetypal myths through explicit and implicit self-brand association in fashion and luxury blogs. In Research in Consumer Behavior; Belk, R.W., Ed.; Emerald Group Publishing Limited: Leeds, UK, 2010; Volume 12, pp. 313–329. [Google Scholar]
- Jiménez-Castillo, D.; Sánchez-Fernández, R. The role of digital influencers in brand recommendation: Examining their impact on engagement, expected value and purchase intention. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2019, 49, 366–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lou, C.; Yuan, S. Influencer marketing: How message value and credibility affect consumer trust of branded content on social media. J. Interact. Advert. 2019, 19, 58–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Jans, S.; Cauberghe, V.; Hudders, L. How an advertising disclosure alerts young adolescents to sponsored vlogs: The moderating role of a peer-based advertising literacy intervention through an informational vlog. J. Advert. 2018, 47, 309–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baber, R.; Baber, P. Influence of social media marketing efforts, e-reputation and destination image on intention to visit among tourists: Application of SOR model. J. Hosp. Tour. Insights 2023, 6, 2298–2316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benlian, A. Web personalization cues and their differential effects on user assessments of website value. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 2015, 32, 225–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rabbanee, F.K.; Roy, R.; Spence, M.T. Factors affecting consumer engagement on online social networks: Self-congruity, brand attachment, and self-extension tendency. Eur. J. Mark. 2020, 54, 1407–1431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Godey, B.; Manthiou, A.; Pederzoli, D.; Rokka, J.; Aiello, G.; Donvito, R.; Singh, R. Social media marketing efforts of luxury brands: Influence on brand equity and consumer behavior. J. Bus. Res. 2016, 69, 5833–5841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Katz, E.; Lazarsfeld, P.F.; Roper, E. The part played by people in the flow of mass communications. In Personal Influence, 1st ed.; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2017; pp. 17–28. [Google Scholar]
- Goffman, E. Presentation of self in everyday life. Am. J. Sociol. 1949, 55, 6–7. [Google Scholar]
- Thompson, C.J.; Hirschman, E.C. Understanding the socialized body: A poststructuralist analysis of consumers’ self-conceptions, body images, and self-care practices. J. Consum. Res. 1995, 22, 139–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bishop, P. The development of the personality. In Analytical Psychology and German Classical Aesthetics: Goethe, Schiller, and Jung, 1st ed.; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2007; Volume 1, pp. 1–11. [Google Scholar]
- Dawn, D. In search of brand image: A foundation analysis. Adv. Consum. Res. 1990, 17, 110–119. [Google Scholar]
- Peña-García, N.; Gil-Saura, I.; Rodríguez-Orejuela, A.; Siqueira-Junior, J.R. Purchase intention and purchase behavior online: A cross-cultural approach. Heliyon 2020, 6, e04284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mehrabian, A.; Russell, J.A. An Approach to Environmental Psychology; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1974. [Google Scholar]
- Ajzen, I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 1991, 50, 179–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brown, S.P.; Stayman, D.M. Antecedents and consequences of attitude toward the ad: A meta-analysis. J. Consum. Res. 1992, 19, 34–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, C.S.; Ma, L. News sharing in social media: The effect of gratifications and prior experience. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2012, 28, 331–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wirtz, B.W.; Piehler, R.; Ullrich, S. Determinants of social media website attractiveness. J. Electron. Commer. Res. 2013, 14, 11. [Google Scholar]
- Belk, R. You are what you can access: Sharing and collaborative consumption online. J. Bus. Res. 2014, 67, 1595–1600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eroglu, S.A.; Machleit, K.A.; Davis, L.M. Atmospheric qualities of online retailing: A conceptual model and implications. J. Bus. Res. 2001, 54, 177–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, H.J.; Eckman, M.; Yan, R.N. Application of the Stimulus-Organism-Response model to the retail environment: The role of hedonic motivation in impulse buying behavior. Int. Rev. Retail Distrib. Consum. Res. 2011, 21, 233–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spranger, E. The psychology and ethics of personality. In Types of Men; Niemeyer: Halle, Germany, 1928. [Google Scholar]
- Bruno, L.F.; Lay, E.G. Personal values and leadership effectiveness. J. Bus. Res. 2008, 61, 678–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Illies, J.J.; Reiter-Palmon, R. Responding destructively in leadership situations: The role of personal values and problem construction. J. Bus. Ethics. 2008, 82, 251–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- House, R.J. Path-goal theory of leadership: Lessons, legacy, and a reformulated theory. Leadersh. Q. 1996, 7, 323–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tannenbaum, R.; Schmidt, W.H. How to choose a leadership pattern. In Leadership Perspectives, 1st ed.; Hooper, A., Ed.; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2006; pp. 75–84. [Google Scholar]
- Schwartz, S.H. Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1992; Volume 25, pp. 1–65. [Google Scholar]
- Bearden, W.O.; Netemeyer, R.G.; Teel, J.E. Measurement of consumer susceptibility to interpersonal influence. J. Consum. Res. 1989, 15, 473–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bagozzi, R.P.; Dholakia, U.M. Antecedents and purchase consequences of customer participation in small group brand communities. Int. J. Res. Mark. 2006, 23, 45–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sirgy, M.J. The self-concept in relation to product preference and purchase intention. In Marketing Horizons: A 1980’s Perspective. In Proceedings of the 1980 Academy of Marketing Science (AMS) Annual Conference, Dallas, TX, USA, 30 April–3 May 1980; Bellur, V.V., Camerius, J.W., Gnauck, B.G., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Germany, 2014; pp. 350–354. [Google Scholar]
- Sirgy, M.J. Self-concept in consumer behavior: A critical review. J. Consum. Res. 1982, 9, 287–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jensen Schau, H.; Gilly, M.C. We are what we post? Self-presentation in personal web space. J. Consum. Res. 2003, 30, 385–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choi, S.M.; Rifon, N.J. It is a match: The impact of congruence between celebrity image and consumer ideal self on endorsement effectiveness. Psychol. Mark. 2012, 29, 639–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gerbing, D.W.; Anderson, J.C. An updated paradigm for scale development incorporating unidimensionality and its assessment. J. Mark. Res. 1988, 25, 186–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hair, J.F. Multivariate data analysis. In International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science; Lovric, M., Ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Nunnally, J.C. An overview of psychological measurement. In Clinical Diagnosis of Mental Disorders: A Handbook; Wolman, B.B., Ed.; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 1978; pp. 97–146. [Google Scholar]
- Pett, M.A.; Lackey, N.R.; Sullivan, J.J. Making sense of factor analysis: The use of factor analysis for instrument development in health care research. In Making Sense of Factor Analysis; Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Fornell, C.; Larcker, D.F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 1981, 18, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, L.T.; Bentler, P.M. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct. Equ. Model. A Multidiscip. J. 1999, 6, 1–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bollen, K.A. Structural Equations with Latent Variables; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1989; Volume 210. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, T.K. T test as a parametric statistic. Korean J. Anesthesiol. 2015, 68, 540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, M.H.; Kim, S.J.; Yoon, S.H.; Park, S. An integrative approach to determinants of pre-roll ad acceptance and their relative impact: Evidence from big data. J. Advert. 2022, 51, 76–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Topics | Focuses and Antecedents | Sources | Research Gaps |
---|---|---|---|
Source characteristics | Perceived credibility | [2,13,23] | Prior work explores a wide range of SMIs’ characteristics. But they overlook the characteristics derived from specific personalities and values that impact consumers. |
Popularity | [7] | ||
Expertise | [12,22] | ||
Psychological-related influential factors | Endorser–brand fit [9] | [7,9] | These studies solely consider SMIs as products and brand promoters. They overlook a perspective of charismatic leaders that SMIs serve online to provide an in-depth and comprehensive understanding of SMIs’ effect. |
Desires to follow advice and mimic behaviors [18] | [10,22] | ||
Parasocial interaction and intimacy | [2,22] | ||
Reputation and electronic word of mouth (eWOM) | [8,25] | ||
Perceived fit of personalities, interests, attitudes between SMIs, and consumers | [2,10] | The research explores consumers’ perceived congruency as a whole concept and the corresponding impact in fostering consumer positive responses. However, these studies neglect the in-depth exploration of how specific value exerted by SMIs affects consumers. | |
Content features | Message value and narrative strategies | [8,10, 20,21] | These studies primarily illustrate characteristics of strategies employed by SMIs to structure eWOM and to convey marketing contents, particularly by textual and photo-based posts. They neglect an in-depth exploration on specific strategies to structure eWOM to interpret the meanings of products and brands to consumers. |
Disclosure of sponsorship | [9,20,24] | ||
Consumer outcomes | Brand attitude | [4,7,13,26] | Prior studies primarily focused on consumer outcomes variables that were motivated by SMIs on traditional social media platforms such as Twitter, TikTok, and Instagram. More exploration on video-based platforms that has stronger user bonding and attachment is needed. |
Engagement, including likes and comments | [10,22,27] | ||
Trust | [23] | ||
Purchase intention | [2,23,26] |
Constructs | Label | Items | Sources |
---|---|---|---|
Purchase intention | PI1 | I would like to know more about this product. | Sokolova and Kefi [2] |
PI2 | I would like to keep the information about this product as a reference when shopping. | ||
PI3 | It is very likely that I will consider buying this product. | ||
Forwarding intention | FI1 | I am willing to forward and discuss this video ad with others. | Rabbanee et al. [27]; Lee and Ma [38] |
FI2 | I am willing to share and discuss this product with others. | ||
FI3 | I am willing to share and discuss the videos of this influencer with others. | ||
Self-enhancement value | SEV1 | I think this influencer is competent to recommend the product. | Schwartz [48] |
SEV2 | I think this influencer is very capable. | ||
SEV3 | I think this influencer is very accomplished. | ||
SEV4 | I think this influencer is knowledgeable. | ||
SEV5 | I think this influencer is authoritative. | ||
SEV6 | I think this influencer has influential power. | ||
Self-transcendence value | STV1 | I think this blogger cares about others. | |
STV2 | I think this blogger is friendly. | ||
STV3 | I think this blogger is inclusive. | ||
STV4 | I think this blogger is willing to help. | ||
STV5 | I think this blogger advocates for the benefits of others. | ||
STV6 | I emotionally endorse this blogger. | ||
The ideal self | IS1 | I think the state of this influencer corresponds to the ideal state I want to have. | Malär et al. [14]; Sirgy et al. [51] |
IS2 | The overall image of this influencer corresponds to the image I wish to have. | ||
IS3 | I hope to have the personal characteristics presented by the influencer. | ||
The actual self | AS1 | The status of this influencer reminds me of my state at work. | |
AS2 | The overall image of this influencer corresponds to my image in reality. | ||
AS3 | I think I have the personal characteristics presented by the influencer. |
Category | Category | N | % |
---|---|---|---|
Gender | Male | 216 | 48.54 |
Female | 229 | 51.46 | |
Age | Under 18 | 70 | 15.73 |
19–25 | 56 | 12.58 | |
26–30 | 73 | 16.40 | |
31–40 | 73 | 16.40 | |
41–50 | 72 | 16.18 | |
Above 51 | 101 | 22.70 | |
Education | High school or lower | 104 | 23.37 |
College | 125 | 28.09 | |
Bachelor | 102 | 22.92 | |
Master or above | 114 | 25.62 | |
Actual monthly income | CNY 3000 or lower, (USD 419 or lower) | 72 | 16.18 |
CNY 3001–CNY 6000, (USD 420–USD 840) | 87 | 19.55 | |
CNY 6001–CNY 10,000, (USD 841–USD 1400) | 72 | 16.18 | |
CNY 10,001–CNY 15,000, (USD 1401 to USD 2101) | 74 | 16.63 | |
CNY 15,001–CNY 20,000 (USD 1402 to USD 2801) | 67 | 15.06 | |
Above CNY 20,001 (above USD 2802) | 73 | 16.40 |
Constructs | Items | Sig. | Std. Estimate | Average Variance Extracted (AVE) | Composite Reliability (CR) | IS | AS | FI | PI |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IS | IS1 | - | 0.812 | 0.591 | 0.812 | 0.796 | |||
IS2 | <0.001 | 0.719 | |||||||
IS3 | <0.001 | 0.773 | |||||||
AS | AS1 | - | 0.842 | 0.589 | 0.810 | 0.203 | 0.767 | ||
AS2 | <0.001 | 0.717 | |||||||
AS3 | <0.001 | 0.737 | |||||||
FI | FI1 | - | 0.861 | 0.591 | 0.811 | 0.266 | 0.313 | 0.769 | |
FI2 | <0.001 | 0.760 | |||||||
FI3 | <0.001 | 0.674 | |||||||
PI | PI1 | - | 0.935 | 0.645 | 0.843 | 0.346 | 0.393 | 0.2353 | 0.803 |
PI2 | <0.001 | 0.744 | |||||||
PI3 | <0.001 | 0.712 |
Fit Indices | df | Sig. | /DF | GFI | RMSEA | AGFI | CFI | NFI | TLI | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cut-off Point | - | - | <0.05 | <3 | >0.9 | <0.10 | >0.9 | >0.9 | >0.9 | >0.9 |
Figures | 109.047 | 48 | 0.000 | 2.272 | 0.962 | 0.054 | 0.938 | 0.971 | 0.950 | 0.960 |
Path | Estimate | S.E. | t-Value | p | Decision |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
IS ← SEV | 0.251 | 0.052 | 4.871 | *** | H1a Support |
AS ← SEV | 0.241 | 0.041 | 5.819 | *** | H1b Support |
IS ← SEV | 0.253 | 0.047 | 5.442 | *** | H2a Support |
AS ← SEV | 0.229 | 0.037 | 6.187 | *** | H2b Support |
FI ← IS | 0.268 | 0.066 | 4.044 | *** | H3a Support |
PI ← IS | 0.215 | 0.041 | 5.234 | *** | H3b Support |
FI ← AS | 0.454 | 0.085 | 5.348 | *** | H4a Support |
PI ← AS | 0.343 | 0.052 | 6.543 | *** | H4b Support |
Path | Effect | Estimate | S.E. | BootLLCI | BootULCI |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEV ≥ IS → FI | Indirect Effect | 0.035 | 0.011 | 0.016 | 0.059 |
Direct Effect | 0.121 *** | 0.037 | 0.049 | 0.195 | |
Total Effect | 0.157 *** | 0.037 | 0.084 | 0.229 | |
SEV → IS → PI | Indirect Effect | 0.044 | 0.012 | 0.023 | 0.070 |
Direct Effect | 0.215 *** | 0.035 | 0.146 | 0.284 | |
Total Effect | 0.258 *** | 0.036 | 0.189 | 0.328 | |
SEV → AS → FI | Indirect Effect | 0.051 | 0.013 | 0.027 | 0.080 |
Direct Effect | 0.106 *** | 0.037 | 0.032 | 0.179 | |
Total Effect | 0.157 *** | 0.037 | 0.084 | 0.229 | |
SEV → AS → PI | Indirect Effect | 0.059 | 0.013 | 0.036 | 0.088 |
Direct Effect | 0.199 *** | 0.035 | 0.130 | 0.269 | |
Total Effect | 0.258 *** | 0.036 | 0.189 | 0.328 | |
STV → IS → FI | Indirect Effect | 0.033 | 0.010 | 0.015 | 0.054 |
Direct Effect | 0.190 *** | 0.035 | 0.120 | 0.259 | |
Total Effect | 0.222 *** | 0.035 | 0.153 | 0.291 | |
STV → IS → PI | Indirect Effect | 0.047 | 0.012 | 0.023 | 0.072 |
Direct Effect | 0.187 *** | 0.034 | 0.120 | 0.255 | |
Total Effect | 0.234 *** | 0.035 | 0.166 | 0302 | |
STV → AS → FI | Indirect Effect | 0.044 | 0.012 | 0.023 | 0.069 |
Direct Effect | 0.177 *** | 0.036 | 0.108 | 0.247 | |
Total Effect | 0.222 *** | 0.035 | 0.153 | 0.291 | |
STV → AS → PI | Indirect Effect | 0.059 | 0.013 | 0.037 | 0.086 |
Direct Effect | 0.175 *** | 0.034 | 0.107 | 0.242 | |
Total Effect | 0.234 *** | 0.035 | 0.166 | 0.302 |
Construct | Male | Female | T | p |
---|---|---|---|---|
IS (scenario 1) | 0.983 | −1.326 | 0.186 | |
AS (scenario 1) | −0.259 | 0.796 | ||
FI (scenario 1) | −2.225 | 0.027 | ||
PI (scenario 1) | −1.786 | 0.075 | ||
IS (scenario 2) | −0.819 | 0.413 | ||
AS (scenario 2) | −0.338 | 0.736 | ||
FI (scenario 2) | 0.969 | 0.333 | ||
PI (scenario 2) | −2.295 | 0.022 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Chen, H.; Ren, J. Can Influencer Persona Increase the Effectiveness of Social Media Video Ads? The Mediating Effect of Consumer Perceptions of Self. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 2024, 19, 2451-2475. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer19030118
Chen H, Ren J. Can Influencer Persona Increase the Effectiveness of Social Media Video Ads? The Mediating Effect of Consumer Perceptions of Self. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research. 2024; 19(3):2451-2475. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer19030118
Chicago/Turabian StyleChen, Haoyu, and Jifan Ren. 2024. "Can Influencer Persona Increase the Effectiveness of Social Media Video Ads? The Mediating Effect of Consumer Perceptions of Self" Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research 19, no. 3: 2451-2475. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer19030118
APA StyleChen, H., & Ren, J. (2024). Can Influencer Persona Increase the Effectiveness of Social Media Video Ads? The Mediating Effect of Consumer Perceptions of Self. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 19(3), 2451-2475. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer19030118