The Impact of Chatbots on Customer Loyalty: A Systematic Literature Review
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Theoretical Background
2.1. Customer Loyalty
2.2. Chatbots
3. Materials and Methods
4. Results
4.1. Descriptive Analysis
4.2. Thematic Analysis
4.2.1. The Drivers of Customer Loyalty: Satisfaction, Trust, and Commitment
4.2.2. The Role of Chatbots within Customer Experience: System Quality, Service Quality, and Information Quality
4.2.3. Complaint Handling
4.2.4. Privacy Paradox and Personalization
4.2.5. Customer Experience and Customer Loyalty
5. Discussion
5.1. Practical Implications
5.2. Theoretical Implications and Future Research
5.3. Limitations
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Maroengsit, W.; Piyakulpinyo, T.; Phonyiam, K.; Pongnumkul, S.; Chaovalit, P.; Theeramunkong, T. A Survey on Evaluation Methods for Chatbots. In Proceedings of the 2019 7th International Conference on Information and Education Technology–ICIET 2019, Aizu-Wakamatsu, Japan, 29–31 March 2019; ACM Press: New York, NY, USA, 2019; pp. 111–119. [Google Scholar]
- Suwono, L.V.; Sihombing, S.O. Factors Affecting Customer Loyalty of Fitness Centers: An Empirical Study. J. Din. Manaj. 2016, 7, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McLean, G.; Wilson, A. Evolving the online customer experience … is there a role for online customer support? Comput. Hum. Behav. 2016, 60, 602–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Siswi, A.A.; Wahyono, W. The Role of Customer Satisfaction in Increasing Customer Loyalty. Manag. Anal. J. 2020, 9, 17–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brandtzaeg, P.B.; Følstad, A. Why People Use Chatbots. Internet Sci. 2017, 377–392, 377–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ameen, N.; Hosany, S.; Tarhini, A. Consumer interaction with cutting-edge technologies: Implications for future research. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2021, 120, 106761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hallowell, R. The relationships of customer satisfaction, customer loyalty, and profitability: An empirical study. Int. J. Serv. Ind. Manag. 1996, 7, 27–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- MSI. Research Priorities 2020–2022. Massachusetts, in Marketing Science Institute. Available online: https://www.msi.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/MSI_RP20-22.pdf (accessed on 12 January 2022).
- Innis, D.E.; La Londe, B.J. Modelling the Effects of Customer Service Performance on Purchase Intentions in the Channel. J. Mark. Theory Pract. 1994, 2, 45–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hoyer, W.D.; Kroschke, M.; Schmitt, B.; Kraume, K.; Shankar, V. Transforming the Customer Experience Through New Technologies. J. Interact. Mark. 2020, 51, 57–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lemon, K.N.; Verhoef, P.C. Understanding Customer Experience Throughout the Customer Journey. J. Mark. 2016, 80, 69–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Crolic, C.; Thomaz, F.; Hadi, R.; Stephen, A.T. Blame the Bot: Anthropomorphism and Anger in Customer–Chatbot Interactions. J. Mark. 2021, 86, 132–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gartner Says 25 Percent of Customer Service Operations Will Use Virtual Customer Assistants by 2020. (2018, February 19). Gartner. Available online: https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2018-02-19-gartner-says-25-percent-of-customer-service-operations-will-use-virtual-customer-assistants-by-2020. (accessed on 3 April 2021).
- Fornell, C. A National Customer Satisfaction Barometer: The Swedish Experience. J. Mark. 1992, 56, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McMullan, R.; Gilmore, A. Customer loyalty: An empirical study. Eur. J. Mark. 2008, 42, 1084–1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pratminingsih, S.A.; Lipuringtyas, C.; Rimenta, T. Factors Influencing Customer Loyalty Toward Online Shopping. Int. J. Trade Econ. Financ. 2013, 4, 104–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Van Vuuren, T.; Roberts-Lombard, M.; Van Tonder, E. Customer satisfaction, trust and commitment as predictors of customer loyalty within an optometric practice environment. South. Afr. Bus. Rev. 2012, 16, 81–96. [Google Scholar]
- Bryant, A.; Colledge, B. Trust in electronic commerce business relationships. J. Electron. Commer. Res. 2002, 3, 32–39. [Google Scholar]
- Herrmann, A.; Xia, L.; Monroe, K.B.; Huber, F. The influence of price fairness on customer satisfaction: An empirical test in the context of automobile purchases. J. Prod. Brand Manag. 2007, 16, 49–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kotler, P.; Armstrong, G. Principles of Marketing; Pearson Education: London, UK, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Leck, J.D.; Saunders, D.M. Hirschman’s loyalty: Attitude or behavior? Empl. Responsib. Rights J. 1992, 5, 219–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rust, R.T.; Zahorik, A.J. Customer satisfaction, customer retention, and market share. J. Retail. 1993, 69, 193–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shoemaker, S.; Lewis, R.C. Customer loyalty: The future of hospitality marketing. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 1999, 18, 345–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lake, D.G. Winning the service game, by Benjamin Schneider and David E. Bowen, Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Hum. Res. Manag. 1995, 34, 463–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carvajal, S.A. The impact of personalization and complaint handling on customer loyalty. Afr. J. Bus. Manag. 2011, 5, 13187–13196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mende, M.; Scott, M.L.; Van Doorn, J.; Grewal, D.; Shanks, I. Service Robots Rising: How Humanoid Robots Influence Service Experiences and Elicit Compensatory Consumer Responses. J. Mark. Res. 2019, 56, 535–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sidaoui, K.; Jaakkola, M.; Burton, J. AI feel you: Customer experience assessment via chatbot interviews. J. Serv. Manag. 2020, 31, 745–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Delone, W.H.; McLean, E.R. Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable. Inf. Syst. Res. 1992, 3, 60–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Trivedi, J. Examining the Customer Experience of Using Banking Chatbots and Its Impact on Brand Love: The Moderating Role of Perceived Risk. J. Internet Commer. 2019, 18, 91–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hagberg, J.; Jonsson, A.; Egels-Zandén, N. Retail digitalization: Implications for physical stores. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2017, 39, 264–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chung, M.; Ko, E.; Joung, H.; Kim, S.J. Chatbot e-service and customer satisfaction regarding luxury brands. J. Bus. Res. 2020, 117, 587–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kokolakis, S. Privacy attitudes and privacy behaviour: A review of current research on the privacy paradox phenomenon. Comp. Sec. 2017, 64, 122–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hokanson, S. The deeper you analyze, the more you satisfy customers. Mark. News 1995, 29, 16. [Google Scholar]
- Lyngdoh, T.; Chefor, E.; Hochstein, B.; Britton, B.P.; Amyx, D. A systematic literature review of negative psychological states and behaviors in sales. J. Bus. Res. 2021, 122, 518–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hoy, M.B. Alexa, Siri, Cortana, and More: An Introduction to Voice Assistants. Med Ref. Serv. Q. 2018, 37, 81–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Need-to-Know Chatbot Statistics in 2021. (2020, May 6). ChatBot. Available online: https://www.chatbot.com/blog/chatbot-statistics/ (accessed on 3 April 2021).
- Yen, C.; Chiang, M.-C. Trust me, if you can: A study on the factors that influence consumers’ purchase intention triggered by chatbots based on brain image evidence and self-reported assessments. Behav. Inf. Technol. 2021, 40, 1177–1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akhtar, M.; Neidhardt, J.; Werthner, H. The Potential of Chatbots: Analysis of Chatbot Conversations. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE 21st Conference on Business Informatics (CBI), Moscow, Russia, 15–17 July 2019; Volume 1, pp. 397–404. [Google Scholar]
- Ba, S.; Johansson, W.C. An Exploratory Study of the Impact of e-Service Process on Online Customer Satisfaction. Prod. Oper. Manag. 2008, 17, 107–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Følstad, A.; Skjuve, M. Chatbots for customer service. In Proceedings of 1st International Conference on Conversational User Interfaces–CUI ’19; Dublin, Ireland, 22–23 August 2019, ACM Press: New York, NY, USA, 2019; Volume 19, pp. 1–9. [Google Scholar]
- Kormpho, P.; Liawsomboon, P.; Phongoen, N.; Pongpaichet, S. Smart Complaint Management System. In Proceedings of the 2018 Seventh ICT International Student Project Conference (ICT-ISPC), Nakhonpathom, Thailand, 11–13 July 2018; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Przegalinska, A.; Ciechanowski, L.; Stroz, A.; Gloor, P.; Mazurek, G. In bot we trust: A new methodology of chatbot performance measures. Bus. Horiz. 2019, 62, 785–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Araujo, T. Living up to the chatbot hype: The influence of anthropomorphic design cues and communicative agency framing on conversational agent and company perceptions. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2018, 85, 183–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chattaraman, V.; Kwon, W.-S.; Gilbert, J.E. Virtual agents in retail web sites: Benefits of simulated social interaction for older users. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2012, 28, 2055–2066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Toader, D.-C.; Boca, G.; Toader, R.; Măcelaru, M.; Toader, C.; Ighian, D.; Rădulescu, A.T. The Effect of Social Presence and Chatbot Errors on Trust. Sustainability 2019, 12, 256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Følstad, A.; Nordheim, C.B.; Bjørkli, C.A. What Makes Users Trust a Chatbot for Customer Service? An Exploratory Interview Study. Internet Sci. 2018, 194–208, 194–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Youn, S.; Jin, S.V. “In A.I. we trust?” The effects of parasocial interaction and technopian versus luddite ideological views on chatbot-based customer relationship management in the emerging “feeling economy”. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2021, 119, 106721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nguyen, T.; Quach, S.; Thaichon, P. The effect of AI quality on customer experience and brand relationship. J. Consum. Behav. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gnewuch, U.; Morana, S.; Adam, M.; Maedche, A. Faster is not always better: Understanding the effect of dynamic re-sponse delays in human-chatbot interaction. In Proceedings of the 26th European Conference on Information Systems: Beyond Digitization–Facets of Socio-Technical Change, ECIS 2018, Portsmouth, UK, 23–28 June 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Rossmann, A.; Zimmermann, A.; Hertweck, D. The Impact of Chatbots on Customer Service Performance. In Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing; Springer: Singapore, 2020; pp. 237–243. [Google Scholar]
- Hwang, S.; Kim, B.; Lee, K. A Data-Driven Design Framework for Customer Service Chatbot. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 2019, 222–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elsholz, E.; Chamberlain, J.; Kruschwitz, U. Exploring Language Style in Chatbots to Increase Perceived Product Value and User Engagement. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval, Glasgow, UK, 10–14 March 2019; ACM Press: New York, NY, USA, 2019; pp. 301–305. [Google Scholar]
- Johari, N.M.; Zaman, H.B.; Nohuddin, P.N.E. Ascertain Quality Attributes for Design and Development of New Improved Chatbots to Assess Customer Satisfaction Index (CSI): A Preliminary Study. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science; Springer: Singapore, 2019; pp. 135–146. [Google Scholar]
- Ashfaq, M.; Yun, J.; Yu, S.; Loureiro, S.M.C. I, Chatbot: Modeling the determinants of users’ satisfaction and continuance intention of AI-powered service agents. Telemat. Inform. 2020, 54, 101473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kvale, K.; Sell, O.A.; Hodnebrog, S.; Følstad, A. Improving Conversations: Lessons Learnt from Manual Analysis of Chatbot Dialogues. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 2020, 187–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, Y.; Jiang, H. How Do AI-driven Chatbots Impact User Experience? Examining Gratifications, Perceived Privacy Risk, Satisfaction, Loyalty, and Continued Use. J. Broadcast. Electron. Media 2020, 64, 592–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nordheim, C.B.; Følstad, A.; Bjørkli, C.A. An Initial Model of Trust in Chatbots for Customer Service—Findings from a Questionnaire Study. Interact. Comput. 2019, 31, 317–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martin, K.D.; Kim, J.J.; Palmatier, R.W.; Steinhoff, L.; Stewart, D.W.; Walker, B.A.; Wang, Y.; Weaven, S.K. Data Privacy in Retail. J. Retail. 2020, 96, 474–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van der Goot, M.J.; Pilgrim, T. Exploring Age Differences in Motivations for and Acceptance of Chatbot Communication in a Customer Service Context. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 2020, 173–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Xu, A.; Liu, Z.; Guo, Y.; Sinha, V.; Akkiraju, R. A New Chatbot for Customer Service on Social Media. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Denver, CO, USA, 6–11 May 2017; ACM Press: New York, NY, USA, 2017; pp. 3506–3510. [Google Scholar]
- Liebrecht, C.; Sander, L.; Van Hooijdonk, C. Too Informal? How a Chatbot’s Communication Style Affects Brand Attitude and Quality of Interaction. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 2021, 16–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rajaobelina, L.; Prom Tep, S.; Arcand, M.; Ricard, L. Creepiness: Its antecedents and impact on loyalty when interacting with a chatbot. Psychol. Mark. 2021, 38, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hallam, C.; Zanella, G. Online self-disclosure: The privacy paradox explained as a temporally discounted balance between concerns and rewards. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2017, 68, 217–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gutierrez, A.; O’Leary, S.; Rana, N.P.; Dwivedi, Y.K.; Calle, T. Using privacy calculus theory to explore entrepreneurial directions in mobile location-based advertising: Identifying intrusiveness as the critical risk factor. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2019, 95, 295–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rese, A.; Ganster, L.; Baier, D. Chatbots in retailers’ customer communication: How to measure their acceptance? J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2020, 56, 102176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van der Goot, M.J.; Hafkamp, L.; Dankfort, Z. Customer Service Chatbots: A Qualitative Interview Study into the Communication Journey of Customers. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 2021, 190–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moriuchi, E. An empirical study on anthropomorphism and engagement with disembodied AIs and consumers’ re-use behavior. Psychol. Mark. 2021, 38, 21–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Go, E.; Sundar, S.S. Humanizing chatbots: The effects of visual, identity and conversational cues on humanness perceptions. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2019, 97, 304–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sheehan, B.; Jin, H.S.; Gottlieb, U. Customer service chatbots: Anthropomorphism and adoption. J. Bus. Res. 2020, 115, 14–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ling, E.C.; Tussyadiah, I.; Tuomi, A.; Stienmetz, J.; Ioannou, A. Factors influencing users’ adoption and use of conversational agents: A systematic review. Psychol. Mark. 2021, 38, 1031–1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Balakrishnan, J.; Dwivedi, Y.K. Role of cognitive absorption in building user trust and experience. Psychol. Mark. 2021, 38, 643–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Borau, S.; Otterbring, T.; Laporte, S.; Wamba, S.F. The most human bot: Female gendering increases humanness perceptions of bots and acceptance of AI. Psychol. Mark. 2021, 38, 1052–1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
ScopusSearch Words | Hits | Papers Selected Based on Abstract | Additional Related Papers Selected Based on Abstract | Papers Excluded after Reading the Full Text | Total Chosen Papers |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
“customer loyalty” AND chatbot * | 5 | 3 | 9 | 4 | 8 |
“customer experience” AND chatbot * | 35 | 20 | 12 | 22 | 14 |
“customer satisfaction” AND chatbot * OR “virtual assistant” | 42 | 21 | 9 | 17 | 16 |
“loyalty” AND chatbot * | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Construct | Definition | Found Articles | Findings/Comments | Future Research | Practical Implications |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Customer loyalty: Customer trust Included in 17 studies | Trust of a customer in a brand [18]. | Hallowell [7]; Van Vuuren et al. [17]; Bryant and Colledge [18]; Mende et al. [26]; Sidaoui et al. [27]; Yen and Chiang [37]; Akhtar et al. [38]; Ba and Johansson [39]; Følstad and Skjuve [40]; Kormpho et al. [41]; Przegalinska et al. [42]; Araujo [43]; Chattaraman et al. [44]; Toader et al. [45]; Følstad et al. [46]; Youn and Jin [47]; Nguyen et al. [48]. | Initial evidence that chatbots with human-like cues can significantly influence emotional connection and users’ trust. The same outcome is not found for satisfaction. for chatbots, trust is a crucial factor because users do not want to share personal information if they have trust concerns. | The chatbot and its trust reduction may be more efficient in complex websites or with older people. That needs further research. | Companies should put into winning customers’ trust by sharing reviews and being transparent. |
Customer loyalty: Customer satisfaction Included in 12 studies | Satisfaction of customers with company’s products, services, and capabilities [19]. | Van Vuuren [17]; Herrmann et al. [19]; Yen and Chiang [37]; Følstadt and Skjuve [40]; Kormpho et al. [41]; Araujo [43]; Youn and Jin [47]; Gnewuch et al. [49]; Rossmann et al. [50]; Hwang et al. [51]; Elsholz et al. [52]; Johari et al. [53]. | Chatbots have a more substantial impact on word-of-mouth and reuse intent, while customer satisfaction obtained through traditional customer service has a stronger impact on customer loyalty. | The most important thing for customer satisfaction is helping the customer out and giving them a good experience. Studies found that chatbots improve the customer experience. Investigate the relationship between loyalty and chatbots. | Optimize the customer experience to raise customer satisfaction. |
Customer loyalty: Customer commitment Included in 4 studies | Customers’ engagement or continuous obligation to return to the same company [20]. | Van Vuuren et al. [17]; Kotler and Armstrong [20]; Trivedi [29]; Akhtar et al. [38]; Araujo [43]. | Customer loyalty can only happen if companies can build an emotional relationship with their customers. | Further analyze the role of the language of chatbots to create commitment. | Focus on social bonding tactics to improve customer commitment. |
Chatbots: Service quality Included in 10 studies | Service quality is essential for companies because it influences customers’ satisfaction, loyalty, and purchase intentions. Assurance, responsiveness, and empathy are the dimensions of service quality [29]. | Brandtzaeg and Følstad [5]; Hoyer et al. [10]; Trivedi [29]; Yen and Chiang [37]; Kormpho et al. [41]; Følstad and Skjuve [40]; Følstad et al. [46]; Nguyen et al. [48]; Rossmann et al. [50]; Ashfaq et al. [54]; Kvale et al. [55]. | Service quality positively affects customer experience, which in turn influences brand love. Chatbots impact stronger on word-of-mouth and intention to reuse, whereas customer satisfaction derived by a hotline is affecting stronger on customer loyalty. | Analysis to understand and improve chatbot dialogue to improve the customer experience. | The need for diligence in chatbot training to optimize service. Involve inter-disciplinary teams in training chatbots to optimize the chatbot service. |
Chatbots: System quality Included in 8 studies | System quality consists of the dimensions: accuracy, response time, usability, reliability, availability, and adaptability to measure technical success [29]. | Brandtzaeg and Følstad [5]; Trivedi [29]; Yen and Chiang [37]; Akhtar et al. [38]; Følstad and Skjuve [40]; Følstad et al. [46]; Gnewuch et al. [49]; Ashfaq et al. [54]. | System quality has a significant relationship with customer experience, which influences customer loyalty. A chatbots’ response time represents a social signal that elicits social responses shaped by social expectations. Dynamic response delays increase an individuals’ perception of humanness in a chatbot and, in turn, lead to greater customer satisfaction. | Further research more different types of response delay by chatbots and their effects, e.g., dependent on the text length, static response delays. | The paper examines the importance of system quality toward creating a customer experience. To ensure that, the chatbots need to be highly relevant, reliable, and offer information quickly. Users often feel like the chatbot will harm their privacy. Companies should make the customers aware of the ease and risk-free use. |
Chatbots: Information quality Included in 3 studies | Provide customers with clear, relevant, and valuable information [29]. | Brandtzaeg and Følstad [5]; Trivedi [29]; Følstad and Skjuve [40]. | The customer experience of using chatbots leads to satisfaction and loyalty for the organization. | Further analyze the age, gender, background differences of the understanding in chatbots and the experience with chatbots. | Companies should ensure that chatbots offer highly relevant, reliable, and quick information to consumers at the right time and the place where the customer needs it. |
Complaint handling Included in 4 studies | Handling customer complaints within an organization and helping the customers out. | Carvajal [25]; Chung et al. [31]; Yen and Chiang [37]; Cheng and Jiang [56]. | Chatbots offer customers an easier way to send their complaints to the company. Chatbots could decrease duplicate complaints by suggesting similar complaints to their customers. | Test chatbots in different contexts and different types of websites in terms of complaint handling. | In terms of complaint handling, companies could make use of chatbots as first-line support. |
Personalization Included in 6 studies | Tailored communication based on information an organization has learned about an individual. | Carvajal [25]; Chung et al. [31]; Akhtar et al. [38]; Przegalinska et al. [42]; Hwang et al. [51]; Ashfaq et al. [54]. | Chatbots can satisfy customers by offering personalized service and real-time conversation. Human-like chatbots with a personal approach have a positive influence on customer experience. | Further analyze how chatbots can make personal approaches. | Find the right balance between privacy issues and personalization. |
Privacy paradox Included in 9 studies | Concerns about the exposure of personal information. At the same time, those concerns fade into the background in the face of a reward or offer [32]. | Mende et al. [26]; Sidaoui et al. [27]; Kokolakis [32]; Yen and Chiang [37]; Kormpho et al. [41]; Przegalinska et al. [42]; Cheng and Jiang [56]; Nordheim et al. [57]; Martin et al. [58]. | Individuals might trust machines even more than personal information humans, with users providing more personal information even when they are concerned about their privacy. | Further analyze privacy paradox with chatbots and explore the relationship between privacy concerns, machine heuristic and privacy protection behaviors. | As a company, finding the right balance for customers in terms of their personal information and exposing this in exchange for an offer. There are privacy concerns about chatbots because of unawareness. When customers have more knowledge about chatbots, they will have fewer trust issues. |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Jenneboer, L.; Herrando, C.; Constantinides, E. The Impact of Chatbots on Customer Loyalty: A Systematic Literature Review. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 2022, 17, 212-229. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer17010011
Jenneboer L, Herrando C, Constantinides E. The Impact of Chatbots on Customer Loyalty: A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research. 2022; 17(1):212-229. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer17010011
Chicago/Turabian StyleJenneboer, Liss, Carolina Herrando, and Efthymios Constantinides. 2022. "The Impact of Chatbots on Customer Loyalty: A Systematic Literature Review" Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research 17, no. 1: 212-229. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer17010011
APA StyleJenneboer, L., Herrando, C., & Constantinides, E. (2022). The Impact of Chatbots on Customer Loyalty: A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 17(1), 212-229. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer17010011