Testimonials

What Editors, Authors and Reviewers are saying
 

On behalf of all authors, I would like to thank the Editorial Team for handling our manuscript in an excellent and professional manner during all the steps of the review [...] Read more.

Thank you very much for your quick reply and work. We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional, and rapid processing of our paper by your team, which meets our satisfaction. Looking [...] Read more.

The whole peer-review process is fast and easy to follow, and the comments were helpful to the authors. [...] Read more.

The review process has been quite rapid, with the reviewers providing useful comments and feedback. Gels will definitely play a significant role in bringing visibility to our work and the [...] Read more.

We had a positive experience with the peer review and publication processes of Multimodal Technologies and Interaction. The editors were professional, providing clear and timely communication, while the reviewers [...] Read more.

This is our first research manuscript published in Multimodal Technologies and Interaction (MTI).

We found that the Editorial Office conducted the peer review process professionally and efficiently, contributing to [...] Read more.

The experiences with publishing with IJERPH was positive. Reviewers were insightful with their comments and provided guidance on ways to strengthen various aspects of the manuscript, particularly in description of [...] Read more.

Our team was very satisfied with the experience of publishing in your journal. The template was a bit cumbersome to enter the text into but worth it given how it [...] Read more.

Congratulations on 20 years for the IJERPH journal. We have appreciated our experiences publishing with IJERPH. The journal is very timely in its reviews, comprehensive in its response to [...] Read more.

The process has been very efficient, good feedback from reviewers, and high visibility for our work. [...] Read more.

Publishing with IJERPH has always been a simple, timely process. Reviews are completed quickly and the editors have excellent, clear, and responsive communication. The journal seems to be well-staffed and [...] Read more.

All of my experiences publishing with IJERPH have been wonderful. The journal is a well-oiled machine and in many ways is a model for how the peer-review process should be [...] Read more.

This paper was our first publication in the Multimodal Technologies and Interaction journal. It was a pleasure to manage the process with our associated editor, who was very active and [...] Read more.

It is a pleasure to share our experience with the peer review and publication process of Multimodal Technologies and Interaction. The editors demonstrated exceptional professionalism and provided clear, timely, [...] Read more.

The process of reviewing scientific papers is extremely important. While certainly not as significant as research and the preparation of papers, researchers must still pay due attention to peer review, [...] Read more.

My experience reviewing for MDPI has been highly positive. The review process is well-structured and efficient, providing clear guidelines and evaluation criteria. The platform is user-friendly, and the editorial team [...] Read more.

The reviewing system and process are more convenient for reviewers to review manuscripts and submit comments. Flexibility in submitting revisions is one of the merits of the reviewing process of [...] Read more.

There was an extremely efficient and pleasant review process. Comments from the first reviewer were provided well before the revisions had to be made. MDPI also gave 7 days for [...] Read more.

Publishing in Antioxidants has been a very positive experience. The editors were professional and helpful, and the reviewers were knowledgeable. In addition, the whole process was smooth and rapid, resulting [...] Read more.

The entire process of submission, peer review and editing the article ran very smoothly and professionally. The Editors were quick and efficient and the peer reviewers noticed areas of weakness [...] Read more.

Displaying testimonial 41-60 on page 3 of 68.
Go to page       chevron_left 1 2 3 4 5 chevron_right last_page
Back to TopTop