What Editors, Authors and Reviewers are saying

On behalf of all authors, we would like to thank you for your help during the process of the manuscript (antioxidants-2297297). Thank you for your support in publishing in the [...] Read more.

The peer-reviewing process was efficient, with critical comments aiming to improve the content and quality of the presented data. We would like to highlight the competent and well-organized communication with [...] Read more.

This is my first publication in Antioxidants and I must say that I am very pleased with the whole process. I would like to thank the editor who really upgraded [...] Read more.

It has been a pleasant experience working with the editorial team to have our first manuscript submitted to Antioxidants published in less than a month. The review process is efficient [...] Read more.

The following is the text of my testimonial about the whole peer-review process for my above-mentioned paper which has just been published: I would like to thank the Antioxidants Editorial [...] Read more.

I would like to thank the Antioxidants Editorial team and Ms. Renee Wei for all their efforts with our publication. It was wonderful working with you through this process. [...] Read more.

This is my first publication in Antioxidants. I am very pleased with the whole process, from the initial submission to the revision stage and the acceptance of the manuscript. [...] Read more.

It was the first time that we submitted our paper entitled "Comparison of Intake of Food Groups Based on Dietary Inflammatory Index (DII) and Cardiovascular Risk Factors in the Middle-Age [...] Read more.

We are pleased to publish our work for the second time in Antioxidants. The peer review process is thorough, fair, and constructive. The reviewers provide thoughtful feedback and suggestions [...] Read more.

It was a pleasure to publish in Antioxidants and work with the editors of Antioxidants. We were impressed that the review and publication processes were very fast and our [...] Read more.

Our experience with Antioxidants is a very positive one. Paper management by the Editorial team was fast, effective, and smooth. The submission procedure was simple and quick, starting with the [...] Read more.

Thank you very much for your help. The editing and handling of our manuscript was superb. Hope we can publish again in Antioxidants in the near future. [...] Read more.

Publishing a paper in Antioxidants has been an excellent experience. Everything is very clearly explained, the Editors are helpful and very quick in answering questions, and the reviewing process is [...] Read more.

It has been a pleasure working together with other Guest Editors and the staff of the section "Polymer Networks" of the journal Polymers to achieve a successful Special Issue. I [...] Read more.

The dedication of your staff allows for efficient work on the Special Issues and the success shows that the readers are interested in the topics raised. [...] Read more.

In general very good, flexibility in deadlines important, sometimes it takes time to get good reviewers that deliver and authors that can pay. Free slots for participants in lesseconomical developed [...] Read more.

My experience is good. Reviewers specialized in the subject matter should be sought. The presence of reference authors with discounts and free articles should be increased. It demonstrates the professionalism of the [...] Read more.

This was my first time submitting an article to MDPI, and the submission process was simple and straightforward. We had good communication with the Assistant Editor, and we received clear [...] Read more.

I would like to use this opportunity to thank the MDPI team for publishing my paper.
The swift publication process and polite staff have made this yet another successful and [...] Read more.

I recently had my first publication with MDPI, and it was quite an experience. Despite facing many rounds of revisions and critical remarks from the reviewer, I can confidently say [...] Read more.

Displaying testimonial 41-60 on page 3 of 64.
Back to TopTop