Search Results (8)

Hemorrhoidal disease remains a prevalent yet often overlooked condition, affecting millions worldwide and imposing a substantial healthcare burden. Despite the availability of multiple treatment options, gaps persist in patient education, early symptom recognition, and optimal treatment selection. Recent advancements are evolving the pharmacist’s role in hemorrhoid management beyond traditional over-the-counter (OTC) and prescription approaches. The 2024 American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS) guidelines introduce updates on the use of phlebotonics, a class of venoactive drugs gaining recognition for their role in symptom management, yet largely underutilized in U.S. clinical practice. In parallel, novel clinical tools are reshaping how pharmacists engage in assessment and care. The integration of digital decision-support platforms and structured evaluation algorithms now empowers them to systematically evaluate symptoms, identify red flag signs, and optimize patient triage. These tools reduce diagnostic variability and improve decision-making accuracy. Given their accessibility and trusted role in frontline healthcare, pharmacists are well-positioned to bridge these critical gaps by adopting emerging treatment recommendations, leveraging algorithm-driven assessments, and reinforcing best practices in patient education and referral. This narrative review aims to equip pharmacists with updated insights into evidence-based hemorrhoid management strategies and provide them with structured assessment algorithms to standardize symptom evaluation and treatment pathways. By integrating these innovations, pharmacists can enhance treatment outcomes, promote patient safety, and contribute to improved quality of life (QoL) for individuals suffering from hemorrhoidal disease. Full article

Background: Although considerable data are available on oral venoactive drugs, very little information has been published on the types and outcomes of topical treatments for venous disease (VD). This comprehensive review assesses the efficacy and safety of topical heparin and heparinoid-containing products (HCPs) for VD treatment. Methods: This narrative review adhered to established methodologies and standards, utilizing the Scale for the Assessment of Narrative Review Articles (SANRA) for quality assessment. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across MEDLINE (PubMed), Scopus, and Web of Science, covering publications from January 1, 1950, to December 1, 2024. Findings were presented in a narrative format, following structured recommendations to ensure clarity and coherence. Results: Topical heparin and HCPs provide anticoagulation, enhance microcirculation, and regulate skin permeability, with effects influenced by the concentration and formulation. While they effectively improve skin microcirculation in healthy individuals, research on their intracellular effects is limited. Mucopolysaccharide polysulfate (MPS) in heparinoids offers similar vascular benefits and promotes antithrombotic and anti-inflammatory actions. Moisture and gentle abrasion enhance heparin absorption. Topical heparin and HCPs effectively treat superficial vein thrombosis (SVT) and varicose veins (VVs). Products like Hirudoid significantly alleviate SVT symptoms, including pain and swelling. Clinical trials demonstrate substantial symptom improvement with heparin gel (1000 IU/g). For varicose veins, Xioglican cream stabilizes symptoms and improves quality of life, while other formulations like Essaven Gel and Venoruton enhance microcirculation. Conclusions: Managing VD with topical treatments is complicated by the outdated literature and inconsistent methodologies. There is a clear need for systematic research to establish guidelines on the administration, dosage, and frequency of topical treatments. The recommendations in this review aim to provide a foundation for future studies to improve the management of SVT and VVs disease. Full article

Chronic venous disease (CVeD) affects millions of patients globally, being a multifactorial progressive condition that significantly impacts the quality of life of individuals. Micronized Purified Flavonoid Fraction (MPFF) is the most utilized and studied venoactive drug because of its safety and effectiveness. This study is a real-world, prospective, observational, multicenter cohort study including patients diagnosed with CVeD who were receiving one tablet of MPFF 1000 mg/day for at least one month and who visited medical facilities in Romania in June–July 2022. We aimed to assess their adherence to pharmacological treatment. The intensity of CVeD symptoms was assessed with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), while adherence to conservative treatment was evaluated using the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8) at study inclusion (Visit 1 (V1)) and 8 weeks later, at the study’s end (Visit 3 (V3)). This study recruited 1267 patients diagnosed with CVeD, and the statistical analysis set included 1200 patients, the majority of whom were female (71.5%), ≥51 years old (81.8%), and overweight (41.2%) or obese (33.8%), with a mean Body Mass Index (BMI) value (±SD) of 28.9 ± 5.1 kg/m², classified using the Clinical, Etiological, Anatomical, and Pathophysiological (CEAP) clinical categories as CEAP C3 (38.7%) and C2 (22.6%) at baseline. Mean MMAS-8 scores increased from 6.2 ± 1.9 (V1) to 6.7 ± 1.7 (V3) (p < 0.001). Despite improvement in treatment adherence throughout this study, novel strategies are needed to improve medication adherence and overall health outcomes in CVeD. Full article

Background. Vasoactive drugs are considered an important therapeutic tool in managing phlebolymphologic disease. The current study was performed to evaluate the results of a high-dose diosmin-based combination (Venoplant 2g) in symptomatic patients with chronic venous disease (CVD), treated with endovascular venous surgery, regarding the efficacy of this treatment and the clinical signs and patients’ compliance. Methods: We identified, between April 2022 and March 2023, 50 patients with symptomatic CVD who underwent endovenous ablation and additionally were administered high-dose micronized diosmin. Parameters analyzed in the pre- and post-operative period were the venous clinical severity score (VCSS), the calf circumference, and a VEINES-QOL/Sym questionnaire. Treatment efficacy was assessed in post-operative follow-ups at 1 month and 2 months. Results: Quality-of-life analysis showed a significant improvement between t1 and t2 in both tests administered (VEINES-QOL/Sym: 55.2 ± 2.9, 39.2 ± 12.3, p: 0.001) (VCSS: 6.6 ± 1, 5.1 ± 0.7, p: 0.001). At the secondary endpoint, the results maintained the same improvement trend. Calf circumference was significantly reduced between t1 and t3 (41.7 ± 5.1, 38.3 ± 3.4, p: 0.001). Conclusion: High-dose diosmin, combined with sweet clover 320 mg, Centella asiatica 40 mg, and Vitamin C 200 mg, in patients treated with endovenous ablation, can be significantly effective in terms of clinical results in treating superficial venous disease. A patient’s calf circumference was also found to have decreased considerably during follow-up. No adverse effects have been recorded to date. Full article

Diosmin is widely used as a venoactive drug in the pharmacological treatment of chronic venous disorders. It exerts a strong protective effect on blood vessels via an increase in the elasticity of vessel walls and reduces the permeability of capillary walls, thereby producing an anti-edematous effect. In this paper, we investigated the effectiveness of diosmin and diosmetin in modulating the level of proinflammatory factors in human skin fibroblasts treated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Two variants of the experiments were performed: the flavonoid was added 2 h prior to or 24 h after LPS stimulation. Our study revealed that both flavonoids reduced the levels of IL-6 and Il-1β as well as COX-2 and PGE2 but had no impact on IL-10. However, the addition of the compounds prior to the LPS addition was more effective. Moreover, diosmetin modulated the proinflammatory factors more strongly than diosmin. Our investigations also showed that both flavonoids were potent inhibitors of elastase and collagenase activity, and no differences between the glycoside and aglycone forms were observed. Full article

Objective. To evaluate the incidence of post-embolization syndrome (PES) and the effect of venoactive therapy on its development, severity, and duration after endovascular embolization of gonadal veins (EEGV) with coils in patients with pelvic congestion syndrome (PCS). Materials and Methods. We analyzed the outcomes of EEGV with coils in 70 female patients who received (n = 38; group 1) or did not receive (n = 32; group 2) treatment with a venoactive drug (VAD) before and after the procedure. Assessments of the EEGV efficacy and for possible signs of PES were done on days 1, 5, 10, 15, 20, and 30 after the intervention. All patients underwent transvaginal and transabdominal duplex ultrasound scanning (DUS) after EEGV. In addition, patients with PES were examined using the computed tomography of the pelvic veins in the postprocedural period. Results. Technical success of EEGV was achieved in 100% of patients. Pelvic venous pain (PVP) reduction after EEGV was observed in 77.1% of patients. The PES was diagnosed in 18.6% of cases (10.5% in group 1 vs. 28.1% in group 2, p > 0.05). In three patients of group 1, the protrusion of coils was suspected and eventually verified during the resection of the left gonadal vein with coils. The group 1 patients had less severe post-embolization pain (6.2 ± 0.4 vs. 7.8 ± 0.3 scores in group 2; p = 0.009) and three times shorter duration of PES (5.0 ± 1.2 vs. 16.2 ± 2.7 days; p = 0.003). No significant differences in the diameters of gonadal veins, side of embolization, and number of coils were revealed between patients with and without PES. The rate of parametrium vein thrombosis was found to be significantly higher in patients with PES than in those without PES (30.7% vs. 18.5%, respectively; p < 0.05). Conclusion. The PES is a frequent complication of EEGV with coils and occurs in 18.6% of patients. Venoactive treatment does not effect the incidence of this complication but reduces the PES severity and duration. Full article

Chronic Venous Disease (CVD) is a common medical condition affecting up to 80% of the general population. Clinical manifestations can range from mild to more severe signs and symptoms that contribute to the impairment of the quality of life (QoL) of affected patients. Among treatment options, venoactive drugs such as diosmin are widely used in the symptomatic treatment in all clinical stages. The aim of this study is to determine the effectiveness of a new formulated diosmin in relieving symptoms and improving QoL in patients suffering from CVD. In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter clinical study, CVD patients with a Clinical-Etiology-Anatomy-Pathophysiology (CEAP) classification system between C2 and C4 were randomized to receive a bioavailable diosmin (as μsmin^® Plus) 450 mg tablet once daily or a placebo for 8 weeks. Clinical symptoms and QoL were monitored using the measurement of leg circumference, visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, Global Index Score (GIS) and Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS). A total of 72 subjects completed the study. From week 4, leg edema was significantly decreased in the active group (p < 0.001). An improvement in the VAS score was observed in the active group compared to placebo at the end of treatment (p < 0.05). GIS and VCSS scores were significantly improved in the active group at week 8 (p < 0.001). No treatment related-side effects were recorded. The results of this study showed that the administration of low-dose μsmin^® Plus was safe and effective in relieving symptoms and improving QoL in subjects with CVD. Full article

Chronic venous disease (CVD) is a common pathology, with significant physical and psychological impacts for patients and high economic costs for national healthcare systems. Throughout the last decades, several risk factors for this condition have been identified, but only recently, have the roles of inflammation and endothelial dysfunction been properly assessed. Although still incompletely understood, current knowledge of the pathophysiological mechanisms of CVD reveals several potential targets and strategies for therapeutic intervention, some of which are addressable by currently available venoactive drugs. The roles of these drugs in the clinical improvement of venous tone and contractility, reduction of edema and inflammation, as well as in improved microcirculation and venous ulcer healing have been studied extensively, with favorable results reported in the literature. Here, we aim to review these pathophysiological mechanisms and their implications regarding currently available venoactive drug therapies. Full article