Search Results (5)

Background: Upper eyelid blepharoplasty is one of the most common aesthetic surgeries performed worldwide. The procedure consists of removing excess skin with or without muscle and/or fat from the upper eyelid by a transcutaneous approach and placement of a supratarsal crease. The surgery is performed in a cosmetically sensitive area and every attempt to avoid poor scar formation should be made. Methods: This review presents a conspectus of the existing medical literature regarding scar-avoiding strategies in upper blepharoplasty with the aim of contributing to the reduction in postoperative scar formation. The Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched on 2 September 2025. Results: The search yielded a total of 562 records, and, following screening, eleven publications were included. Conclusions: A systematic approach to pre-, intra-, and postoperative measures to minimize scarring are presented. There is a need to standardize scar assessment and reporting to facilitate inter-study comparison of effects, as well as prospective, randomized studies comparing suture materials and techniques. Full article

This study investigates the effects of levator advancement, with and without upper blepharoplasty, on dry-eye symptoms in patients with unilateral ptosis. A total of 92 patients were included, divided into three groups based on surgical intervention: Group A (ptosis correction alone), Group B (ptosis correction with blepharoplasty), and Group C (blepharoplasty alone). Dry-eye parameters were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively at 1, 3, and 6 months using Tear Break-Up Time (TBUT), Schirmer test, corneal and conjunctival staining, and the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire. Our findings indicate that patients in Groups A and B exhibited a temporary increase in dry-eye symptoms, with the most significant effects observed in Group B at the 1- and 3-month follow-ups. By 6 months, dry-eye parameters in all groups returned close to baseline levels, underscoring the reversible nature of these symptoms. This study highlights the importance of preoperative counseling regarding potential temporary dry-eye symptoms, particularly for patients undergoing combined ptosis and blepharoplasty procedures. The results support the safety of these surgical approaches, provided there is appropriate patient monitoring and management to ensure symptom resolution over time. Full article

Supraorbital hollowness and pretarsal fullness, commonly known as the sunken eyelid and charming roll, respectively, are significant anatomical features that impact the aesthetic appearance of the periorbital region. Supraorbital hollowness is characterized by a recessed appearance of the upper eyelid, often attributed to genetic factors, aging, or surgical alterations, such as excessive fat removal during blepharoplasty. This condition is particularly prevalent among East Asians due to anatomical differences, such as weaker levator muscles and unique fat distribution patterns. Pretarsal fullness, also known as aegyo-sal, enhances the youthful and expressive appearance of the lower eyelid, forming a roll above the lash line that is considered aesthetically desirable in East Asian culture. Anatomical-based filler injection techniques are critical for correcting these features, involving precise placement within the correct tissue planes to avoid complications and achieve natural-looking results. This approach not only improves the aesthetic appeal of the eyelid but also enhances the overall facial harmony, emphasizing the importance of tailored procedures based on individual anatomy and cultural preferences. Full article

Background and Objective: Various periorbital rejuvenation techniques have been introduced over the last 3 decades. This study highlights important milestones in the evolution of periorbital rejuvenation surgery by identifying the 100 most-cited articles in this field. Material and Methods: The Web of Science citation index was used to identify the 100 most-cited articles concerning periorbital rejuvenation. Articles published in English from January 1989–April 2020 describing periorbital rejuvenation-related surgical techniques, facial aging, and anatomy were included. The terms “lower blepharoplasty”, “upper blepharoplasty”, “browlift”, “browplasty”, “endobrow lift”, “endoscopic brow”, “Foreheadplasty”, “lower eyelid anatomy”, “upper eyelid anatomy”, “forehead lift”, “eyelid rejuvenation”, “canthopexy”, “canthoplasty”, “eyelid fat pad”, “orbital fat pad”, “tear trough”, and “eyelid bags” were entered into the citation search. Web of Science Core Collection was the database used for the search. A manual review of the initial 159 studies was performed. Articles describing reconstructive or non-invasive techniques, injectable fillers, lasers, and neurotoxins were excluded. Of the 100 most-cited articles, the publication year, specialty journal, the corresponding author’s primary specialty, the focus of the article, the corresponding author’s country of residence, the type of study, and the level of evidence were analyzed. Results: The mean number of citations per article was 75 ± 42. There were more articles published from 1989–1999 (n = 53) than later decades. Most articles originated from the USA (n = 82) and were published in plastic surgery journals (n = 81). Plastic surgery was the primary specialty of the corresponding authors (n = 71), followed by oculoplastic surgery (n = 22). Most articles (n = 69) reported on surgical techniques. Of the clinical studies (n = 69), 45 (79%) provided level IV evidence. Conclusions: Of the 100 most-cited studies on periorbital rejuvenation, studies focusing on periorbital anatomy, aging, and surgical techniques comprised the most-cited publications. An anatomically based approach accounting for age-related changes in the periorbital structures is paramount in the field of contemporary periorbital rejuvenation. Full article

Study Design: A prospective randomized comparative study was conducted to evaluate the postsurgical scar with Supraorbital Eyebrow (SE) Approach and Upper Blepharoplasty (UB) Approach used for open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) fractures. Objective: To evaluate and compare the post-operative scar using Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) following ORIF of ZMC fractures with SE and UB approaches. Methods: In this study, 88 patients with ZMC fractures requiring ORIF and meeting the inclusion criteria were recruited between 2019 and 2020. Patients were randomly divided into SE and UB group, 44 patients in each. Clinical and radiological assessment was done preoperatively and post-operative scar evaluation was carried out at different intervals over a period of 6 months using VSS. A blinded observer rated the scar. Results: The results showed that after 6 months of surgery, all the 44 (100%) patients in UB group had a mild scar (VSS score 1–5), while in the SE group 34 (77.3%) patients had a mild scar (VSS score 1–5) and 10 (22.7%) had a moderate scar (VSS score 6–10). The difference between the 2 groups was statistically significant (p-value = 0.001). Conclusions: The UB approach has been established to be superior to SE approach in terms of post-operative scar as the results were statistically significant. This study can be used to advocate more frequent use of UB approach as compared to the previously popular SE approach for the management of ZMC fractures. Full article