Search Results (3)

Background/Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy, accuracy, safety, and long-term stability of topography-guided photorefractive keratectomy (TGPRK) in eyes where post-LASIK (PLE) ectasia progression was stabilized with under-flap corneal crosslinking (ufCXL). Methods: This retrospective interventional case series included six eyes from five patients with PLE after microkeratome LASIK. All eyes underwent ufCXL to halt ectatic progression. A shallow TGPRK enhancement was performed on the LASIK flap surface after corneal and refractive stability was confirmed (18 months median) post ufCXL Outcome measures included uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity (UDVA, CDVA), spherical equivalent (SEQ), refractive astigmatism, keratometry, and corneal irregularity indices over a mean follow-up of 47 months. Results: ufCXL stabilized ectatic progression but left residual refractive errors, limiting UDVA. TGPRK performed subsequently significantly improved UDVA, from 0.38 to 0.10 LogMAR (p = 0.017), and increased the LASIK efficacy index from 0.46 to 0.83 (p = 0.0087). Refractive astigmatism was reduced in all eyes achieving a SEQ within ±1.00 D of the target. Long-term stability was maintained, with no ectasia progression, no change in SEQ, no change in corneal irregularity indices, and no increase in maximal keratometry. Conclusions: TGPRK performed in ufCXL stabilized corneas can safely correct residual refractive errors, resulting in significant and sustained improvements in both refractive and visual outcomes in PLE. Full article

Background: Managing post-keratoplasty astigmatism remains challenging. Even though graft viability is the main concern in keratoplasty, astigmatism might hinder vision recovery following a successful corneal transplant. Photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and topography-guided PRK may be options for correcting refractive errors in patients who underwent keratoplasty. The aim of the study was to compare the results of PRK and topography-guided PRK in patients who had undergone corneal keratoplasty. Methods: This study was conducted at the Chair and Ophthalmology Clinic of the Medical University of Silesia, at the Railway Hospital Katowice, from 2023 to 2024. Patients who underwent penetrating keratoplasty due to keratoconus or corneal scar (post-traumatic and post-inflammatory) with a residual spherical myopic or mixed myopic astigmatic refractive defect were included in this study. The studied patients were divided into two groups: 15 patients underwent PRK and 15 patients underwent topography-guided PRK. Each participant underwent a preoperative examination, including uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) and best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) measured on the Snellen chart (LCD panel for visual acuity testing Frey CP-400, Optotech Medical, Niepołomnice, Niepołomice, Poland), cycloplegic refraction, corneal pachymetry and topography (Schwind Sirius+, Pentacam), wavefront aberrations (Schwind Peramis, Pentacam), applanation tonometry, and anterior and posterior segment examinations, conducted at baseline and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. Results: Keratoconus was the most common reason for keratoplasty (80% vs. 60%). Following PRK, the mean KI in group (1) decreased significantly to 43.88 ± 3.64 (p < 0.001), and in the group (2), the mean diopters decreased significantly after the intervention to 46.46 ± 2.80 (p < 0.001). The mean spherical refractive error in group (2) changed significantly after the intervention, reaching −2.72 ± 1.28 D (p < 0.001). The mean cylinder in group (1) changed significantly after PRK to have a mean of −2.75 ± 1.44 D (p < 0.001). Also, in group (2), it changed significantly after the intervention to have a mean of −2.95 ± 1.99 D (p < 0.001). There was a significant increase in both uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) after topography-guided PRK at all the follow-up points of 1, 3, 6, and 12 months (p < 0.001). The mean higher-order corneal aberrations (HOAs) after topography-guided PRK were 1.33 ± 0.50, ranging from 0.22 to 2.34 (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Topography-guided PRK is safer and more effective in correcting aberrations and refractive errors after corneal keratoplasty than regular PRK. Additionally, topography-guided PRK reduces high-order aberrations by utilizing advanced topographic mapping of the cornea, enabling precise customization of the treatment to address individual corneal surface irregularities. Full article

Purpose: To investigate if topography-guided photorefractive keratectomy (TGPRK) alleviates headache, particularly headache attributed to refractive errors (HARE) in keratoconus. Methods: Patients diagnosed with keratoconus undergoing TGPRK for refractive correction were included. Best spectacle corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) using the logMAR scale and refractive error were measured. Patients answered a questionnaire exploring headaches, characteristics, treatment, and the Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) before and 6 months after the surgery. Results: 40 patients were included. Preoperatively, 24 patients (60%) met criteria for headaches: five for migraine, 14 for HARE, and five for tension-type headache (TTH). Patients with headaches preoperatively were more likely to require bilateral TGPRK, and the mean sphere and cylindrical power were higher. Postoperatively, 15 out of the 24 patients of the headache group experienced complete resolution of headaches, and only nine patients met diagnostic criteria for headaches: two for migraine, six for HARE, and one for TTH. The number of headaches reduced from 4.4 ± 2.4 to 0.5 ± 0.7 days/week (p < 0.001). Headache duration decreased from 108.5 ± 100.7 min to 34.4 ± 63.5 min (p = 0.002). Postoperatively, the consumption of analgesia decreased. The HIT-6 revealed an improvement in the quality-of-life post-procedure (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Surgical correction of irregular astigmatism in patients with keratoconus can alleviate or resolve headaches in a large proportion of patients, resulting in an improvement in their quality of life. Physicians should consider keratoconus in patients fitting criteria for HARE not alleviated by spectacle correction and suboptimal vision in glasses. Full article