Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (4)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = sustainability hyperlinks

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
18 pages, 3723 KB  
Article
Empowering Weak Languages Through Cross-Language Hyperlink Recommendation
by Nhu Nguyen, Hideaki Takeda and Lakshan Karunathilake
Information 2025, 16(9), 749; https://doi.org/10.3390/info16090749 - 29 Aug 2025
Viewed by 1026
Abstract
Wikipedia is an important platform for promoting language inclusivity and sharing global knowledge. However, while languages with more resources have a lot of content, languages with fewer resources face challenges in accessibility and cultural representation. To help address this gap, we use multilingual [...] Read more.
Wikipedia is an important platform for promoting language inclusivity and sharing global knowledge. However, while languages with more resources have a lot of content, languages with fewer resources face challenges in accessibility and cultural representation. To help address this gap, we use multilingual datasets and neural graph collaborative filtering to recommend missing hyperlinks, helping to improve low-resource languages on Wikipedia. By encouraging cross-language collaboration, this method strengthens the connections and content of these languages, promoting cultural sustainability and digital inclusion. Experimental results show significant improvement in recommendation quality, with clear benefits for weaker languages. This highlights the role of recommender systems in preserving unique cultural aspects, building connections between language communities, and supporting fair knowledge sharing in a globalized world. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 1713 KB  
Article
Anti-Sustainability Narratives in Chat Apps: What Shapes the Brazilian Far-Right Discussion About Socio-Environmental Issues on WhatsApp and Telegram
by Rose Marie Santini, Débora Gomes Salles, Marina Loureiro Santos, Luciane Leopoldo Belin and Thiago Ciodaro
Journal. Media 2025, 6(2), 85; https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia6020085 - 10 Jun 2025
Viewed by 3309
Abstract
This study examines how socio-environmental issues are framed and disseminated in far-right WhatsApp and Telegram groups in Brazil. By collecting and analyzing over 87,962 messages shared from 2023 to 2024, we identify how the sustainability agenda is instrumentalized to deepen political polarization. Using [...] Read more.
This study examines how socio-environmental issues are framed and disseminated in far-right WhatsApp and Telegram groups in Brazil. By collecting and analyzing over 87,962 messages shared from 2023 to 2024, we identify how the sustainability agenda is instrumentalized to deepen political polarization. Using a mixed-methods approach guided by a theoretical–methodological perspective in framing theory, we applied topic modeling to identify key themes and conducted qualitative analysis to categorize hyperlinked sites shared by group participants. The results suggest that environmental discussions in these groups are often intertwined with broader cultural war narratives and economic interests, particularly agribusiness. Disinformation, conspiracy theories, and attacks on environmental policies, activists, and NGOs are common strategies used to reinforce the salience of frames that undermine sustainability efforts. This study highlights the role of chat apps in facilitating the spread of anti-environmental narratives due to their decentralized and encrypted nature. Additionally, the findings suggest that hyperlinking practices within these groups can be understood as a framing strategy that contributes to the legitimization of misleading narratives by repeatedly circulating information from biased or unreliable sources. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

30 pages, 3629 KB  
Article
Intergenerational Practice in the Community—What Does the Community Think?
by Gail Kenning, Nicole Ee, Ying Xu, Billy L. Luu, Stephanie A. Ward, Micah B. Goldwater, Ebony Lewis, Katrina Radford, Kaarin J. Anstey, Nicola T. Lautenschlager, Janna Anneke Fitzgerald, Kenneth Rockwood and Ruth Peters
Soc. Sci. 2021, 10(10), 374; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci10100374 - 7 Oct 2021
Cited by 14 | Viewed by 9415
Abstract
The many changes that occur in the lives of older people put them at an increased risk of being socially isolated and lonely. Intergenerational programs for older adults and young children can potentially address this shortfall, because of the perceived benefit from generations [...] Read more.
The many changes that occur in the lives of older people put them at an increased risk of being socially isolated and lonely. Intergenerational programs for older adults and young children can potentially address this shortfall, because of the perceived benefit from generations interacting. This study explores whether there is an appetite in the community for intergenerational programs for community dwelling older adults. An online survey was distributed via social media, research team networks, and snowballing recruitment with access provided via QR code or hyperlink. Semi-structured interviews were undertaken with potential participants of a pilot intergenerational program planned for the Eastern Suburbs of Sydney, Australia in 2020. The interviews were thematically analyzed. Over 250 people completed the survey, and 21 interviews took place with older adults (10) and parents of young children (11). The data showed that participants were all in favor of intergenerational programs, but there were different perceptions about who benefits most and how. The study highlighted considerations to be addressed in the development of effective and sustainable intergenerational programs. For example, accessing people in the community who are most socially isolated and lonely was identified as a primary challenge. More evidence-based research is needed to support involvement of different cohorts, such as those who are frail, or living with physical or cognitive limitations. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

28 pages, 2712 KB  
Article
Cyberspace Knowledge Gaps and Boundaries in Sustainability Science: Topics, Regions, Editorial Teams and Journals
by Stanley D. Brunn
Sustainability 2014, 6(10), 6576-6603; https://doi.org/10.3390/su6106576 - 29 Sep 2014
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 6950
Abstract
The scholarly world of sustainability science is one that is international and interdisciplinary, but is one, on close reading of research contributions, editoral teams, journal citations, and geographic coverage, that has much unevenness. The focus of this paper is on the cyberspace boundaries [...] Read more.
The scholarly world of sustainability science is one that is international and interdisciplinary, but is one, on close reading of research contributions, editoral teams, journal citations, and geographic coverage, that has much unevenness. The focus of this paper is on the cyberspace boundaries between and within fields and disciplines studying sustainability; these boundaries separate knowledge gaps or uneven patterns in sustainability scholarship. I use the volume of hyperlinks on Google Search Engine and Google Scholar to illustrate the nature and extent of the boundaries in cyberspace that exist and also the subject and geographic gaps in the home countries of sustainability journal editors and editorial board members of 69 journals, many which have appeared since 2000. The results reveal that knowledge boundaries are part of the current nature of sustainability scholarship and that, while there is global coverage in our knowledge of sustainability, as well as sustainability maps and photographs, we know much less about sustainability in countries of the Global South than the Global North. This unevenness extends to the dominance of North America, Europe, and China as leaders in what we know. English-speaking countries also tend to dominate both journal editors and editorial board members, even though countries in the Global South have representation. The volumes of hyperlinks for the sustainability journals associated with both databases are similar with major interdisciplinary journals having the largest numbers. As the field of international sustainability science continues to evolve, it bears observing whether the cyberspace knowledge or boundary gaps will narrow in what is recognized by most science and policy scientists as one of the most important transdisciplinary fields of study in the Global South and North. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Borderland Studies and Sustainability)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop