Search Results (3)

Online adaptive radiotherapy mitigates errors in absorbed dose delivery due to daily anatomical changes during hypofractionated breast treatment, particularly when comprehensive nodal therapy includes the internal mammary chain. To illustrate this, we present a case of a 65-year-old woman with left-sided luminal B invasive carcinoma, who underwent segmentectomy and level 1–2 dissection. Pathology revealed an 18 × 15 × 13 mm primary tumor with lymphovascular invasion, two of eleven axillary nodes positive, and intramammary metastasis, staged pT1cN1a. She received adjuvant docetaxel–cyclophosphamide followed by letrozole. Hypofractionated radiotherapy (40 Gy in 15 fractions) was administered in an inspiration breath-hold setting using a CBCT-guided online-adaptive platform. Adaptive planning improved V95% coverage over the planned treatment for all targets: on average, whole breast coverage increased from 88.4% to 96.3%, supraclavicular from 93.0% to 97.1%, axilla from 90.6% to 96.7%, and internal mammary from 91.8% to 95.9%. Organ-at-risk metrics remained within limits: the mean heart dose increased slightly (from an average of 0.12 Gy in scheduled to 0.15 Gy in adaptive plans). At the same time, the LAD D0.03 cm³ decreased, and the heart V4 Gy fell modestly (from 13.3% in the scheduled plan to 8.2% in the adaptive plan), reflecting low-dose redistribution without exceeding constraints. Lung and thyroid mean doses remained comparable. The patient tolerated treatment well, with no acute toxicity or local recurrence. This case highlights the importance of daily adaptation for complex left-sided radiation treatment involving internal mammary nodes, demonstrating target recovery without exceeding absorbed dose constraints and supporting future studies on control, toxicity, and quality of life. Full article

We retrospectively enrolled 139 patients who developed metachronous isolated supraclavicular lymph node metastasis (miSLNM) from 8129 consecutive patients who underwent primary surgery between 1990 and 2008 at a single medical center. The median age was 47 years. The median follow-up time from date of primary tumor surgery was 73.1 months, and the median time to the date of neck relapse was 43.9 months in this study. Sixty-one (43.9%) patients underwent selective neck dissection (SND). The 5-year distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), post-recurrence survival, and overall survival (OS) rates in the SND group were 31.1%, 40.3%, and 68.9%, respectively, whereas those of the no-SND group were 9.7%, 32.9%, and 57.7%, respectively (p = 0.001). No SND and time interval from primary tumor surgery to neck relapse ≤24 months were the only significant risk factors in the multivariate analysis of DMFS (hazard ratio (HR), 1.77; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.23–2.56; p = 0.002 and HR, 1.76, 95% CI, 1.23–2.52; p = 0.002, respectively) and OS (HR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.22–2.55; p = 0.003 and HR, 3.54, 95% CI, 2.44–5.16; p < 0.0001, respectively). Multimodal therapy, including neck dissection, significantly improved the DMFS and OS of miSLNM. Survival improvement after miSLNM control by intensive surgical treatment suggests that miSLNM is not distant metastasis. Full article

Background: Delineating the nodal clinical target volume (CTVn) remains a challenging task in patients with cervical or upper thoracic esophageal carcinoma (EC). In particular, the extent of the lymph area that should be included in the irradiation field remains controversial. In the present study, the extent of the CTVn was determined based on the incidence of lymph node involvement mapped by computed tomography (CT) imaging. Methods: Our study included 468 patients who were diagnosed with cervical and upper thoracic ec and who received staging information between June 2005 and April 2011. The anatomic distribution of metastatic regional lymph nodes was mapped using CT images and grouped using the levels established by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. The probability of the various groups being involved was examined. If a lymph node group had a probability of 10% or more of being involved, it was considered at high risk for metastasis, and elective treatment as part of the CTVn was recommended. Results: Lymph node involvement was mapped by CT in 256 patients (54.7%). Not all lymph node groups should be included in the CTVn. For cervical lesions, the involved lymph nodes were located mainly between the hyoid bone and the arcus aortae; the recommended CTVn should consist of the neck lymph nodes at levels iii and iv (supraclavicular group) and thoracic groups 2 and 3P. In upper thoracic ec patients, most of the involved lymph nodes were distributed between the cricoid cartilage and the subcarinal area; the CTVn should cover the supraclavicular group and thoracic nodal groups 2, 3P, 4, 5, and 7. Conclusions: Our CT-based study indicates a specific distribution and incidence of metastatic lymph node groups in patients with cervical and upper thoracic EC. The results suggest that regional lymph node groups should be electively included in the CTVn for precise radiation administration. Full article