Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (2)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = supraclavicular nodal metastasis

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
12 pages, 2213 KiB  
Article
Long-Term Outcomes of Breast Cancer Patients Who Underwent Selective Neck Dissection for Metachronous Isolated Supraclavicular Nodal Metastasis
by Shin-Cheh Chen, Shih-Che Shen, Chi-Chang Yu, Ting-Shuo Huang, Yung-Feng Lo, Hsien-Kun Chang, Yung-Chang Lin, Wen-Ling Kuo, Hsiu-Pei Tsai, Hsu-Huan Chou, Li-Yu Lee and Yi-Ting Huang
Cancers 2022, 14(1), 164; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14010164 - 29 Dec 2021
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2592
Abstract
We retrospectively enrolled 139 patients who developed metachronous isolated supraclavicular lymph node metastasis (miSLNM) from 8129 consecutive patients who underwent primary surgery between 1990 and 2008 at a single medical center. The median age was 47 years. The median follow-up time from date [...] Read more.
We retrospectively enrolled 139 patients who developed metachronous isolated supraclavicular lymph node metastasis (miSLNM) from 8129 consecutive patients who underwent primary surgery between 1990 and 2008 at a single medical center. The median age was 47 years. The median follow-up time from date of primary tumor surgery was 73.1 months, and the median time to the date of neck relapse was 43.9 months in this study. Sixty-one (43.9%) patients underwent selective neck dissection (SND). The 5-year distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), post-recurrence survival, and overall survival (OS) rates in the SND group were 31.1%, 40.3%, and 68.9%, respectively, whereas those of the no-SND group were 9.7%, 32.9%, and 57.7%, respectively (p = 0.001). No SND and time interval from primary tumor surgery to neck relapse ≤24 months were the only significant risk factors in the multivariate analysis of DMFS (hazard ratio (HR), 1.77; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.23–2.56; p = 0.002 and HR, 1.76, 95% CI, 1.23–2.52; p = 0.002, respectively) and OS (HR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.22–2.55; p = 0.003 and HR, 3.54, 95% CI, 2.44–5.16; p < 0.0001, respectively). Multimodal therapy, including neck dissection, significantly improved the DMFS and OS of miSLNM. Survival improvement after miSLNM control by intensive surgical treatment suggests that miSLNM is not distant metastasis. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

5 pages, 542 KiB  
Article
Computed Tomography–Based Distribution of Involved Lymph Nodes in Patients with Upper Esophageal Cancer
by M. Li, Y. Liu, L. Xu, Y. Huang, W. Li, J. Yu and L. Kong
Curr. Oncol. 2015, 22(3), 178-182; https://doi.org/10.3747/co.22.2365 - 1 Jun 2015
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 713
Abstract
Background: Delineating the nodal clinical target volume (CTVn) remains a challenging task in patients with cervical or upper thoracic esophageal carcinoma (EC). In particular, the extent of the lymph area that should be included in the irradiation field remains [...] Read more.
Background: Delineating the nodal clinical target volume (CTVn) remains a challenging task in patients with cervical or upper thoracic esophageal carcinoma (EC). In particular, the extent of the lymph area that should be included in the irradiation field remains controversial. In the present study, the extent of the CTVn was determined based on the incidence of lymph node involvement mapped by computed tomography (CT) imaging. Methods: Our study included 468 patients who were diagnosed with cervical and upper thoracic ec and who received staging information between June 2005 and April 2011. The anatomic distribution of metastatic regional lymph nodes was mapped using CT images and grouped using the levels established by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. The probability of the various groups being involved was examined. If a lymph node group had a probability of 10% or more of being involved, it was considered at high risk for metastasis, and elective treatment as part of the CTVn was recommended. Results: Lymph node involvement was mapped by CT in 256 patients (54.7%). Not all lymph node groups should be included in the CTVn. For cervical lesions, the involved lymph nodes were located mainly between the hyoid bone and the arcus aortae; the recommended CTVn should consist of the neck lymph nodes at levels iii and iv (supraclavicular group) and thoracic groups 2 and 3P. In upper thoracic ec patients, most of the involved lymph nodes were distributed between the cricoid cartilage and the subcarinal area; the CTVn should cover the supraclavicular group and thoracic nodal groups 2, 3P, 4, 5, and 7. Conclusions: Our CT-based study indicates a specific distribution and incidence of metastatic lymph node groups in patients with cervical and upper thoracic EC. The results suggest that regional lymph node groups should be electively included in the CTVn for precise radiation administration. Full article
Back to TopTop