Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (11)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = sum of ranking differences (SRD)

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
23 pages, 4215 KiB  
Article
Frequent Errors in Modeling by Machine Learning: A Prototype Case of Predicting the Timely Evolution of COVID-19 Pandemic
by Károly Héberger
Algorithms 2024, 17(1), 43; https://doi.org/10.3390/a17010043 - 19 Jan 2024
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 3050
Abstract
Background: The development and application of machine learning (ML) methods have become so fast that almost nobody can follow their developments in every detail. It is no wonder that numerous errors and inconsistencies in their usage have also spread with a similar [...] Read more.
Background: The development and application of machine learning (ML) methods have become so fast that almost nobody can follow their developments in every detail. It is no wonder that numerous errors and inconsistencies in their usage have also spread with a similar speed independently from the tasks: regression and classification. This work summarizes frequent errors committed by certain authors with the aim of helping scientists to avoid them. Methods: The principle of parsimony governs the train of thought. Fair method comparison can be completed with multicriteria decision-making techniques, preferably by the sum of ranking differences (SRD). Its coupling with analysis of variance (ANOVA) decomposes the effects of several factors. Earlier findings are summarized in a review-like manner: the abuse of the correlation coefficient and proper practices for model discrimination are also outlined. Results: Using an illustrative example, the correct practice and the methodology are summarized as guidelines for model discrimination, and for minimizing the prediction errors. The following factors are all prerequisites for successful modeling: proper data preprocessing, statistical tests, suitable performance parameters, appropriate degrees of freedom, fair comparison of models, and outlier detection, just to name a few. A checklist is provided in a tutorial manner on how to present ML modeling properly. The advocated practices are reviewed shortly in the discussion. Conclusions: Many of the errors can easily be filtered out with careful reviewing. Every authors’ responsibility is to adhere to the rules of modeling and validation. A representative sampling of recent literature outlines correct practices and emphasizes that no error-free publication exists. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Supervised and Unsupervised Classification Algorithms (2nd Edition))
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

14 pages, 1525 KiB  
Article
Assessment of Lipophilicity Parameters of Antimicrobial and Immunosuppressive Compounds
by Dawid Wardecki, Małgorzata Dołowy and Katarzyna Bober-Majnusz
Molecules 2023, 28(6), 2820; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28062820 - 21 Mar 2023
Cited by 14 | Viewed by 3848
Abstract
Lipophilicity in addition to the solubility, acid-base character and stability is one of the most important physicochemical parameters of a compound required to assess the ADMET properties (absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion and toxicity) of a bioactive molecule. Therefore, the subject of this work [...] Read more.
Lipophilicity in addition to the solubility, acid-base character and stability is one of the most important physicochemical parameters of a compound required to assess the ADMET properties (absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion and toxicity) of a bioactive molecule. Therefore, the subject of this work was to determine the lipophilicity parameters of selected antimicrobial and immunosuppressive compounds such as delafloxacin, linezolid, sutezolid, ceftazidime, everolimus and zotarolimus using thin-layer chromatography in reversed phase system (RP-TLC). The chromatographic parameters of lipophilicity (RMW) for tested compounds were determined on different stationary phases: RP18F254, RP18WF254 and RP2F254 using ethanol, acetonitrile, and propan-2-ol as organic modifiers of mobile phases used. Chromatographically established RMW values were compared with partition coefficients obtained by different computational methods (AlogPs, AClogP, AlogP, MlogP, XlogP2, XlogP3, logPKOWWIN, ACD/logP, milogP). Both cluster and principal component analysis (CA and PCA) of the received results allowed us to compare the lipophilic nature of the studied compounds. The sum of ranking differences analysis (SRD) of all lipophilicity parameters was helpful to select the most effective method of determining the lipophilicity of the investigated compounds. The presented results demonstrate that RP-TLC method may be a good tool in determining the lipophilic properties of studied substances. Obtained lipophilic parameters of the compounds can be valuable in the design of their new derivatives as efficient antimicrobial and immunosuppressive agents. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 3089 KiB  
Article
Comparative Study of the Lipophilicity of Selected Anti-Androgenic and Blood Uric Acid Lowering Compounds
by Dawid Wardecki, Małgorzata Dołowy, Katarzyna Bober-Majnusz and Josef Jampilek
Molecules 2023, 28(1), 166; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28010166 - 25 Dec 2022
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 2274
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the lipophilicity of a series substances lowering the concentration of uric acid in blood and anti-androgen drugs by thin-layer chromatography in reversed-phase systems (RP-TLC, RP-HPTLC) and computational methods. The chromatographic parameter of lipophilicity (RMW) of tested [...] Read more.
This study aimed to evaluate the lipophilicity of a series substances lowering the concentration of uric acid in blood and anti-androgen drugs by thin-layer chromatography in reversed-phase systems (RP-TLC, RP-HPTLC) and computational methods. The chromatographic parameter of lipophilicity (RMW) of tested compounds was determined on three stationary phases, i.e., RP18F254, RP18WF254 and RP2F254, using ethanol–water, propan-2-ol-water and acetonitrile–water in various volume compositions as mobile phases. The chromatographic analysis led to determining the experimental value of the lipophilicity parameter for each of the tested compounds, including those for which the experimental value of the partition coefficient (logPexp) as a measure of lipophilicity is not well described in available databases, such as febuxostat, oxypurinol, ailanthone, abiraterone and teriflunomide. The chromatographic parameters of lipophilicity were compared with the logP values obtained with various software packages, such as AClogP, AlogPs, AlogP, MlogP, XlogP2, XlogP3, ACD/logP and logPKOWWIN. The obtained results indicate that, among selected chromatographic parameters of lipophilicity, both experimental and calculated logP values gave similar results, and these RP-TLC or RP-HPTLC systems can be successfully applied to estimate the lipophilicity of studied heterocyclic compounds belonging to two different pharmacological groups. This work also illustrates the similarity and difference existing between the tested compounds under study using the chemometric methods, such as principal component analysis (PCA) and cluster analysis (CA). In addition, a relatively new approach based on the sum of ranking differences (SRD) was used to compare the chromatographically obtained and theoretical lipophilicity descriptors of studied compounds. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Heterocycles in Medicinal Chemistry II)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

14 pages, 2602 KiB  
Article
Multiobject Optimization of National Football League Drafts: Comparison of Teams and Experts
by Attila Gere, Dorina Szakál and Károly Héberger
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(13), 6303; https://doi.org/10.3390/app12136303 - 21 Jun 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1669
Abstract
Predicting the success of National Football League drafts has always been an exciting issue for the teams, fans and even for scientists. Among the numerous approaches, one of the best techniques is to ask the opinion of sport experts, who have the knowledge [...] Read more.
Predicting the success of National Football League drafts has always been an exciting issue for the teams, fans and even for scientists. Among the numerous approaches, one of the best techniques is to ask the opinion of sport experts, who have the knowledge and past experiences to rate the drafts of the teams. When asking a set of sport experts to evaluate the performances of teams, a multicriteria decision making problem arises unavoidably. The current paper uses the draft evaluations of the 32 NFL teams given by 18 experts: a novel multicriteria decision making tool has been applied: the sum of ranking differences (SRD). We introduce a quick and easy-to-follow approach on how to evaluate the performance of the teams and the experts at the same time. Our results on the 2021 NFL draft data indicate that Green Bay Packers has the most promising drafts for 2021, while the experts have been grouped into three distinct groups based on the distance to the hypothetical best evaluation. Even the coding options can be tailored according to the experts’ opinions. Statistically correct (pairwise or group) comparisons can be made using analysis of variance (ANOVA). A comparison to TOPSIS ranking revealed that SRD gives a more objective ranking due to the lack of predefined weights. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Trends in Sport and Exercise Medicine II)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 5184 KiB  
Article
Analysis and Consequences on Some Aggregation Functions of PRISM (Partial Risk Map) Risk Assessment Method
by Ferenc Bognár and Csaba Hegedűs
Mathematics 2022, 10(5), 676; https://doi.org/10.3390/math10050676 - 22 Feb 2022
Cited by 19 | Viewed by 2545
Abstract
The PRISM (partial risk map) methodology is a novel risk assessment method developed as the combination of the failure mode and effect analysis and risk matrix risk assessment methods. Based on the concept of partial risks, three different aggregation functions are presented for [...] Read more.
The PRISM (partial risk map) methodology is a novel risk assessment method developed as the combination of the failure mode and effect analysis and risk matrix risk assessment methods. Based on the concept of partial risks, three different aggregation functions are presented for assessing incident risks. Since the different aggregation functions give different properties to the obtained PRISM numbers and threshold surfaces (convex, concave, linear), the description of these properties is carried out. Similarity analyses based on the sum of ranking differences (SRD) method and rank correlation are performed and robustness tests are applied related to the changes of the assessment scale lengths. The PRISM method provides a solution for the systematically criticized problem of the FMEA, i.e., it is not able to deal with hidden risks behind the aggregated RPN number, while the method results in an expressive tool for risk management. Applying new aggregation functions, proactive assessment can be executed, and predictions can be given related to the incidents based on the nature of their hidden risk. The method can be suggested for safety science environments where human safety, environmental protection, sustainable production, etc., are highly required. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 2803 KiB  
Article
Comprehensible Visualization of Multidimensional Data: Sum of Ranking Differences-Based Parallel Coordinates
by Ádám Ipkovich, Károly Héberger and János Abonyi
Mathematics 2021, 9(24), 3203; https://doi.org/10.3390/math9243203 - 11 Dec 2021
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2816
Abstract
A novel visualization technique is proposed for the sum of ranking differences method (SRD) based on parallel coordinates. An axis is defined for each variable, on which the data are depicted row-wise. By connecting data, the lines may intersect. The fewer intersections between [...] Read more.
A novel visualization technique is proposed for the sum of ranking differences method (SRD) based on parallel coordinates. An axis is defined for each variable, on which the data are depicted row-wise. By connecting data, the lines may intersect. The fewer intersections between the variables, the more similar they are and the clearer the figure becomes. Therefore, the visualization depends on what techniques are used to order the variables. The key idea is to employ the SRD method to measure the degree of similarity of the variables, establishing a distance-based order. The distances between the axes are not uniformly distributed in the proposed visualization; their closeness reflects similarity, according to their SRD value. The proposed algorithm identifies false similarities through an iterative approach, where the angles between the SRD values determine which side a variable is plotted. Visualization of the algorithm is provided by MATLAB/Octave source codes. The proposed tool is applied to study how the sources of greenhouse gas emissions can be grouped based on the statistical data of the countries. A comparison to multidimensional scaling (MDS)-based ordering is also given. The use case demonstrates the applicability of the method and the synergies of the incorporation of the SRD method into parallel coordinates. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Multiple Criteria Decision Making Approaches)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 1345 KiB  
Article
From Sampling to Analysis: How to Achieve the Best Sample Throughput via Sampling Optimization and Relevant Compound Analysis Using Sum of Ranking Differences Method?
by Dalma Radványi, Magdolna Szelényi, Attila Gere and Béla Péter Molnár
Foods 2021, 10(11), 2681; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10112681 - 3 Nov 2021
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2090
Abstract
The determination of an optimal volatile sampling procedure is always a key question in analytical chemistry. In this paper, we introduce the application of a novel non-parametric statistical method, the sum of ranking differences (SRD), for the quick and efficient determination of optimal [...] Read more.
The determination of an optimal volatile sampling procedure is always a key question in analytical chemistry. In this paper, we introduce the application of a novel non-parametric statistical method, the sum of ranking differences (SRD), for the quick and efficient determination of optimal sampling procedures. Different types of adsorbents (Porapak Q, HayeSep Q, and Carbotrap) and sampling times (1, 2, 4, and 6 h) were used for volatile collections of lettuce (Lactuca sativa) samples. SRD identified 6 h samplings as the optimal procedure. However, 1 or 4 h sampling with HayeSep Q and 2 h sampling with Carbotrap are still efficient enough if the aim is to reduce sampling time. Based on our results, SRD provides a novel way to not only highlight an optimal sampling procedure but also decrease evaluation time. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 1518 KiB  
Article
Improvement of Carrot Accelerated Solvent Extraction Efficacy Using Experimental Design and Chemometric Techniques
by Vesna Tumbas Šaponjac, Strahinja Kovačević, Vanja Šeregelj, Olja Šovljanski, Anamarija Mandić, Gordana Ćetković, Jelena Vulić, Sanja Podunavac-Kuzmanović and Jasna Čanadanović-Brunet
Processes 2021, 9(9), 1652; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9091652 - 13 Sep 2021
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 3896
Abstract
Human studies have demonstrated the multiple health benefits of fruits and vegetables. Due to its high fiber, mineral and antioxidant content, carrot is an ideal source for the development of nutraceuticals or functional ingredients. Current research assesses accelerated solvent extraction (ASE) traits which [...] Read more.
Human studies have demonstrated the multiple health benefits of fruits and vegetables. Due to its high fiber, mineral and antioxidant content, carrot is an ideal source for the development of nutraceuticals or functional ingredients. Current research assesses accelerated solvent extraction (ASE) traits which affect the antioxidant qualities of carrot extract using response surface methodology (RSM), hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA), and the sum of ranking differences (SRD). A mixture of organic solvents, acetone, and ethanol with or without the addition of 20% water was applied. The total carotenoid and polyphenol contents in extracts, as well as their scavenging activity and reducing power, were used as responses for the optimization of ASE extraction. RSM optimization, in the case of 20% water involvement, included 49% of acetone and 31% of ethanol (Opt1), while in the case of pure organic solvents, pure ethanol was the best choice (Opt2). The results of HCA clearly pointed out significant differences between the properties of extracts with or without water. SRD analysis confirmed ethanol to be optimal as well. RSM, HCA, and SRD analysis confirmed the same conclusion—water in the solvent mixture can significantly affect the extraction efficacy, and the optimal solvent for extracting antioxidants from carrot by ASE is pure ethanol. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Natural Bioactive Compound Valorization)
Show Figures

Figure 1

35 pages, 11465 KiB  
Article
Homology Modeling of the Human P-glycoprotein (ABCB1) and Insights into Ligand Binding through Molecular Docking Studies
by Liadys Mora Lagares, Nikola Minovski, Ana Yisel Caballero Alfonso, Emilio Benfenati, Sara Wellens, Maxime Culot, Fabien Gosselet and Marjana Novič
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21(11), 4058; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21114058 - 5 Jun 2020
Cited by 53 | Viewed by 8167
Abstract
The ABCB1 transporter also known as P-glycoprotein (P-gp) is a transmembrane protein belonging to the ATP binding cassette super-family of transporters; it is a xenobiotic efflux pump that limits intracellular drug accumulation by pumping the compounds out of cells. P-gp contributes to a [...] Read more.
The ABCB1 transporter also known as P-glycoprotein (P-gp) is a transmembrane protein belonging to the ATP binding cassette super-family of transporters; it is a xenobiotic efflux pump that limits intracellular drug accumulation by pumping the compounds out of cells. P-gp contributes to a decrease of toxicity and possesses broad substrate specificity. It is involved in the failure of numerous anticancer and antiviral chemotherapies due to the multidrug resistance (MDR) phenomenon, where it removes the chemotherapeutics out of the targeted cells. Understanding the details of the ligand–P-gp interaction is therefore crucial for the development of drugs that might overcome the MRD phenomenon and for obtaining a more effective prediction of the toxicity of certain compounds. In this work, an in silico modeling was performed using homology modeling and molecular docking methods with the aim of better understanding the ligand–P-gp interactions. Based on different mouse P-gp structural templates from the PDB repository, a 3D model of the human P-gp (hP-gp) was constructed by means of protein homology modeling. The homology model was then used to perform molecular docking calculations on a set of thirteen compounds, including some well-known compounds that interact with P-gp as substrates, inhibitors, or both. The sum of ranking differences (SRD) was employed for the comparison of the different scoring functions used in the docking calculations. A consensus-ranking scheme was employed for the selection of the top-ranked pose for each docked ligand. The docking results showed that a high number of π interactions, mainly π–sigma, π–alkyl, and π–π type of interactions, together with the simultaneous presence of hydrogen bond interactions contribute to the stability of the ligand–protein complex in the binding site. It was also observed that some interacting residues in hP-gp are the same when compared to those observed in a co-crystallized ligand (PBDE-100) with mouse P-gp (PDB ID: 4XWK). Our in silico approach is consistent with available experimental results regarding P-gp efflux transport assay; therefore it could be useful in the prediction of the role of new compounds in systemic toxicity. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 2638 KiB  
Article
Lipophilicity Determination of Antifungal Isoxazolo[3,4-b]pyridin-3(1H)-ones and Their N1-Substituted Derivatives with Chromatographic and Computational Methods
by Krzesimir Ciura, Joanna Fedorowicz, Filip Andrić, Petar Žuvela, Katarzyna Ewa Greber, Paweł Baranowski, Piotr Kawczak, Joanna Nowakowska, Tomasz Bączek and Jarosław Sączewski
Molecules 2019, 24(23), 4311; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24234311 - 26 Nov 2019
Cited by 18 | Viewed by 5948
Abstract
The lipophilicity of a molecule is a well-recognized as a crucial physicochemical factor that conditions the biological activity of a drug candidate. This study was aimed to evaluate the lipophilicity of isoxazolo[3,4-b]pyridine-3(1H)-ones and their N1-substituted derivatives, which demonstrated pronounced [...] Read more.
The lipophilicity of a molecule is a well-recognized as a crucial physicochemical factor that conditions the biological activity of a drug candidate. This study was aimed to evaluate the lipophilicity of isoxazolo[3,4-b]pyridine-3(1H)-ones and their N1-substituted derivatives, which demonstrated pronounced antifungal activities. Several methods, including reversed-phase thin layer chromatography (RP-TLC), reversed phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC), and micellar electrokinetic chromatography (MEKC), were employed. Furthermore, the calculated logP values were estimated using various freely and commercially available software packages and online platforms, as well as density functional theory computations (DFT). Similarities and dissimilarities between the determined lipophilicity indices were assessed using several chemometric approaches. Principal component analysis (PCA) indicated that other features beside lipophilicity affect antifungal activities of the investigated derivatives. Quantitative-structure-retention-relationship (QSRR) analysis by means of genetic algorithm—partial least squares (GA-PLS)—was implemented to rationalize the link between the physicochemical descriptors and lipophilicity. Among the studied compounds, structure 16 should be considered as the best starting structure for further studies, since it demonstrated the lowest lipophilic character within the series while retaining biological activity. Sum of ranking differences (SRD) analysis indicated that the chromatographic approach, regardless of the technique employed, should be considered as the best approach for lipophilicity assessment of isoxazolones. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Computational Methods for Drug Discovery and Design)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 5692 KiB  
Article
Multi-Level Comparison of Machine Learning Classifiers and Their Performance Metrics
by Anita Rácz, Dávid Bajusz and Károly Héberger
Molecules 2019, 24(15), 2811; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24152811 - 1 Aug 2019
Cited by 99 | Viewed by 9696
Abstract
Machine learning classification algorithms are widely used for the prediction and classification of the different properties of molecules such as toxicity or biological activity. The prediction of toxic vs. non-toxic molecules is important due to testing on living animals, which has ethical and [...] Read more.
Machine learning classification algorithms are widely used for the prediction and classification of the different properties of molecules such as toxicity or biological activity. The prediction of toxic vs. non-toxic molecules is important due to testing on living animals, which has ethical and cost drawbacks as well. The quality of classification models can be determined with several performance parameters. which often give conflicting results. In this study, we performed a multi-level comparison with the use of different performance metrics and machine learning classification methods. Well-established and standardized protocols for the machine learning tasks were used in each case. The comparison was applied to three datasets (acute and aquatic toxicities) and the robust, yet sensitive, sum of ranking differences (SRD) and analysis of variance (ANOVA) were applied for evaluation. The effect of dataset composition (balanced vs. imbalanced) and 2-class vs. multiclass classification scenarios was also studied. Most of the performance metrics are sensitive to dataset composition, especially in 2-class classification problems. The optimal machine learning algorithm also depends significantly on the composition of the dataset. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Integrated QSAR)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop