Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (2)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = shallow soil strength recovery

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
18 pages, 7698 KiB  
Article
Plant Adaptation and Soil Shear Strength: Unraveling the Drought Legacy in Amorpha fruticosa
by Hao Jiang, Xiaoqing Chen, Gang Xu, Jiangang Chen, Dongri Song, Ming Lv, Hanqing Guo and Jingyi Chen
Plants 2025, 14(2), 179; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14020179 - 10 Jan 2025
Viewed by 873
Abstract
Climate change has led to an increasing frequency of droughts, potentially undermining soil stability. In such a changing environment, the shallow reinforcement effect of plant roots often fails to meet expectations. This study aims to explore whether this is associated with the alteration [...] Read more.
Climate change has led to an increasing frequency of droughts, potentially undermining soil stability. In such a changing environment, the shallow reinforcement effect of plant roots often fails to meet expectations. This study aims to explore whether this is associated with the alteration of plant traits as a response to environmental change. Focusing on Amorpha fruticosa, a species known for its robust root system that plays a crucial role in soil consolidation and slope stabilization, thereby reducing soil and water erosion, we simulated a drought-rewetting event to assess the legacy effects of drought on the soil shear strength and the mechanical and hydrological traits associated with the reinforcement provided by A. fruticosa. The results show that the legacy effect of drought significantly diminishes the soil shear strength. Pretreated with drought, plant roots undergo morphological alterations such as deeper growth, yet the underground root biomass and diameter decline, thereby influencing mechanical reinforcement. Chemical composition analysis indicates that the plant’s adaptation to drought modifies the intrinsic properties of the roots, with varying impacts on different root types and overall reinforcement. Concurrently, the stomatal conductance and transpiration rate of leaves decrease, weakening the capacity to augment soil matric suction through transpiration and potentially reducing hydrological reinforcement. Although rewetting treatments aid in recovery, drought legacy effects persist and impact plant functional attributes. This study emphasizes that, beyond soil matric suction, plant adaptive mechanisms in response to environmental changes may also contribute significantly to reduced soil shear strength. Consequently, ecological restoration strategies should consider plant trait adaptations to drought, enhancing root systems for soil conservation and climate resilience. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 3927 KiB  
Article
Modified Model for Shallow Soil Strength Recovery Calculation during Set-Up Periods of Jetted Conductor—A Case Study of Equatorial Guinea Bay Deep-Water Drilling
by Wei Yan, Said Juma Kambi, Xin Huang, Hai Lin, Hailong Liu and Jingen Deng
Energies 2021, 14(16), 4940; https://doi.org/10.3390/en14164940 - 12 Aug 2021
Viewed by 3510
Abstract
Jetted conductor setting depth is crucial for deep-water drilling. This paper presents an innovative method for determining the shallow soil resistance strength recovery factor based on the field data of Equatorial Guinea bay. It shows that the soil strength recovery factor of Equatorial [...] Read more.
Jetted conductor setting depth is crucial for deep-water drilling. This paper presents an innovative method for determining the shallow soil resistance strength recovery factor based on the field data of Equatorial Guinea bay. It shows that the soil strength recovery factor of Equatorial Guinea bay is lower than that of the Gulf of Mexico. The conductor setting depth calculation referring to other place will have a high risk of wellhead sinking. According to the newly established designing charts, the conductor setting depth was recommended for the S1 well. Each preferred set-up period requires a specific setting depth. If the chosen set-up period is 2 days, the expected setting depth of a 36″ conductor should be 250 ft (76.2 m) and, similarly, 295 ft (89.9 m) for a 30″ conductor. The relationship between set-up period and surface conductor setting depth is established as well. Wellhead landed load appears to be the crucial factor for determining the conductor setting depth. The rationality of the newly developed shallow soil strength recovery model for the Equatorial Guinea deep-water block was also confirmed by the field data. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop