Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

remove_circle_outline

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (2)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = rotationally asymmetrical compound parabolic concentrator

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
15 pages, 3255 KiB  
Article
Life Cycle Assessment of a Rotationally Asymmetrical Compound Parabolic Concentrator (RACPC)
by Przemyslaw Zawadzki, Firdaus Muhammad-Sukki, Siti Hawa Abu-Bakar, Nurul Aini Bani, Abdullahi Abubakar Mas’ud, Jorge Alfredo Ardila-Rey and Abu Bakar Munir
Sustainability 2020, 12(11), 4750; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114750 - 10 Jun 2020
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 3439
Abstract
Integrating a concentrator into the building integrated photovoltaic (BIPV) design has resulted in a new technology known as the building integrated concentrating photovoltaic (BICPV). The rotationally asymmetrical compound parabolic concentrator (RACPC) is an example of a concentrator design that has been explored for [...] Read more.
Integrating a concentrator into the building integrated photovoltaic (BIPV) design has resulted in a new technology known as the building integrated concentrating photovoltaic (BICPV). The rotationally asymmetrical compound parabolic concentrator (RACPC) is an example of a concentrator design that has been explored for use in BICPV. This paper evaluates the life cycle assessment (LCA) for the RACPC-PV module, which has never been explored before. The LCA of the RACPC-PV module has found a cost reduction of 29.09% and a reduction of 11.76% of embodied energy material manufacture when compared to a conventional solar photovoltaic (PV) module. The energy payback time for an RACPC-PV and a conventional PV was calculated to be 8.01 and 6.63 years, respectively. Moreover, the energy return on investment ratio was calculated to be 3.12 for a conventional PV and 3.77 for an RACPC-PV. Full article
(This article belongs to the Collection Sustainability in Product Development)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 1891 KiB  
Communication
Assessment of the RACPC Performance under Diffuse Radiation for Use in BIPV System
by Stephania Foster, Firdaus Muhammad-Sukki, Roberto Ramirez-Iniguez, Daria Freier Raine, Jose Deciga-Gusi, Siti Hawa Abu-Bakar, Nurul Aini Bani, Abu Bakar Munir, Abdullahi Abubakar Mas’ud and Jorge Alfredo Ardila-Rey
Appl. Sci. 2020, 10(10), 3552; https://doi.org/10.3390/app10103552 - 21 May 2020
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 3842
Abstract
In the last four decades there has been a significant increase in solar photovoltaic (PV) capacity, which makes solar one of the most promising renewable energy sources. Following this trend, solar power would become the world’s largest source of electricity by 2050. Building [...] Read more.
In the last four decades there has been a significant increase in solar photovoltaic (PV) capacity, which makes solar one of the most promising renewable energy sources. Following this trend, solar power would become the world’s largest source of electricity by 2050. Building Integrated Photovoltaic (BIPV) systems, in which conventional materials can be replaced with PV panels that become an integral part of the building, can be enhanced with concentrating photovoltaic (CPV) systems. In order to increase the cost efficiency of a BIPV system, an optical concentrator can be used to replace expensive PV material with a lower cost option, whilst increasing the electrical output through the concentration of solar power. A concentrator called rotationally asymmetrical compound parabolic concentrator (RACPC) was analysed in this work under diffuse light conditions. Software simulations and experimental work were carried out to determine the optical concentration gain of the concentrator. Results from this work show that, under diffuse light, the RACPC has an optical concentration gain of 2.12. The experimental work showed a value of 2.20, which confirms the results with only a 3.8% difference. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop