Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (4)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = robotic stereotactic body radiation therapy

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
10 pages, 248 KB  
Article
Comparative Economic Evaluation of Radical Prostatectomy, Radiation, and Ablative Techniques in the Management of Localized Prostate Cancer
by Mahdi Mottaghi, Alireza Ghoreifi, Sriram Deivasigamani, Eric S. Adams, Sudharshanan Balaji, Michael C. Ivey, Cary N. Robertson, Judd W. Moul, Ryan E. Fecteau and Thomas J. Polascik
Cancers 2025, 17(17), 2814; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17172814 - 28 Aug 2025
Viewed by 1173
Abstract
Background: To compare the costs of open retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP), robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RALP), intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), low-dose brachytherapy (LDBT), stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), cryotherapy (Cryo), and high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) for low/intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PCa), from the healthcare system perspective. [...] Read more.
Background: To compare the costs of open retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP), robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RALP), intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), low-dose brachytherapy (LDBT), stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), cryotherapy (Cryo), and high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) for low/intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PCa), from the healthcare system perspective. Methods: This retrospective, IRB-approved study compared the costs and charges of primary treatment options for localized PCa at Duke University Hospital between January 2018 and December 2019. We identified cases by querying the relevant disease, procedural, and charge codes from Duke Finance. Consecutive cases with NCCN high-risk disease, prior treatment, or missing institutional financial information were excluded. Costs were calculated from the point at which the treatment option was selected until the last treatment session (SBRT and IMRT) or hospital discharge (other modalities). All modalities except RRP were considered technology-intensive. Results: A total of 552 patients with a mean age of 65.0 years met the inclusion criteria. NCCN risk categories included 85 (13%) low, 218 (41%) favorable-intermediate, and 249 (46%) unfavorable-intermediate risk cases. RALP, RRP, Cryo, and HIFU were single-session treatments, whereas IMRT, SBRT, and LDBT were delivered over multiple sessions. IMRT and SBRT were the most expensive modalities, followed by RALP, HIFU, LDBT, Cryo, and RRP. The number of sessions (ρ = 0.55, p < 0.001) and being technology-intensive (ρ = 0.58, p < 0.001) were significantly correlated with treatment costs. Conclusions: In this cohort of PCa patients, treatment costs were highest for IMRT and SBRT, followed by RALP, HIFU, LDBT, Cryo, and RRP. The number of treatment sessions was a significant predictor of higher costs. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

15 pages, 1854 KB  
Article
Design and Development of a Device (Sifilotto®) for Tumour Tracking in Cervical Cancer Patients Undergoing Robotic Arm LINAC Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Boost: Background to the STARBACS Study
by Silvana Parisi, Giacomo Ferrantelli, Anna Santacaterina, Elvio Grazioso Russi, Federico Chillari, Claudio Napoli, Anna Brogna, Carmelo Siragusa, Miriam Sciacca, Antonio Pontoriero, Giuseppe Iatì and Stefano Pergolizzi
Curr. Oncol. 2025, 32(6), 354; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32060354 - 16 Jun 2025
Viewed by 770
Abstract
Standard of Care (SOC) for locally advanced cervical cancer is represented by external beam radiation therapy concurrent with platinum-based chemotherapy and immunotherapy (cCIRT) followed by brachytherapy boost and immunotherapy maintenance. In some instances, it is impossible to perform brachytherapy due to patient and/or [...] Read more.
Standard of Care (SOC) for locally advanced cervical cancer is represented by external beam radiation therapy concurrent with platinum-based chemotherapy and immunotherapy (cCIRT) followed by brachytherapy boost and immunotherapy maintenance. In some instances, it is impossible to perform brachytherapy due to patient and/or cancer issues. In these circumstances, an external beam boost could be delivered. Using a robotic arm LINAC, it is mandatory to use intramucosal implanted fiducials which are needed for tumour tracking. To avoid invasive procedures, we developed an original intravaginal 3D-printed universal device containing gold fiducials embedded within it. In this paper, we describe the step-by-step procedure that allowed us to obtain the utility model patent, including the in vivo test (feasibility, reproducibility, device compliance) on seven patients within the study protocol “STereotActic Radiotherapy Boost in locally Advanced Cervical carcinoma patientS” (STARBACS). Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Gynecologic Oncology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 496 KB  
Systematic Review
Robotic Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Oligometastatic Liver Metastases: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Evidence Quality Assessment
by Ilektra Kyrochristou, Ilias Giannakodimos, Maria Tolia, Ioannis Georgakopoulos, Nikolaos Pararas, Francesk Mulita, Nikolaos Machairas and Dimitrios Schizas
Diagnostics 2024, 14(10), 1055; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14101055 - 19 May 2024
Viewed by 1593
Abstract
Introduction: The role of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) as a locally effective therapeutic approach for liver oligometastases from tumors of various origin is well established. We investigated the role of robotic SBRT (rSBRT) treatment on oligometastatic patients with liver lesions. Material and [...] Read more.
Introduction: The role of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) as a locally effective therapeutic approach for liver oligometastases from tumors of various origin is well established. We investigated the role of robotic SBRT (rSBRT) treatment on oligometastatic patients with liver lesions. Material and Methods: This review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. The PubMed and Scopus databases were accessed by two independent investigators concerning robotic rSBRT for liver metastases, up to 3 October 2023. Results: In total, 15 studies, including 646 patients with 847 lesions that underwent rSBRT, were included in our systematic review. Complete response (CR) after rSBRT was achieved in 40.5% (95% CI, 36.66–44.46%), partial response (PR) in 19.01% (95% CI, 16.07–22.33%), whereas stable disease (SD) was recorded in 14.38% (95% CI, 11.8–17.41%) and progressive disease (PD) in 13.22% (95% CI, 10.74–16.17%) of patients. Progression-free survival (PFS) rates at 12 and 24 months were estimated at 61.49% (95% CI, 57.01–65.78%) and 32.55% (95% CI, 28.47–36.92%), respectively, while the overall survival (OS) rates at 12 and 24 months were estimated at 58.59% (95% CI, 53.67–63.33%) and 44.19% (95% CI, 39.38–49.12%), respectively. Grade 1 toxicity was reported in 13.81% (95% CI, 11.01–17.18%), Grade 2 toxicity in 5.57% (95% CI, 3.82–8.01%), and Grade 3 toxicity in 2.27% (955 CI, 1.22–4.07%) of included patients. Conclusions: rSBRT represents a promising method achieving local control with minimal toxicity in a significant proportion of patients. Further studies are needed to evaluate the role of rSBRT in the management of metastatic liver lesions. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 1161 KB  
Article
Image-Guided Robotic Radiosurgery for the Management of Intramedullary Spinal Cord Metastases—A Multicenter Experience
by Felix Ehret, Carolin Senger, Markus Kufeld, Christoph Fürweger, Melina Kord, Alfred Haidenberger, Paul Windisch, Daniel Rueß, David Kaul, Maximilian Ruge, Christian Schichor, Jörg-Christian Tonn and Alexander Muacevic
Cancers 2021, 13(2), 297; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13020297 - 15 Jan 2021
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 2911
Abstract
Background: Intramedullary metastases are rare and bear a dismal prognosis. Limited data are available on the treatment of such lesions. As surgery may be the mainstay of treatment for patients with resectable and localized metastatic spread, previous case reports and case series suggest [...] Read more.
Background: Intramedullary metastases are rare and bear a dismal prognosis. Limited data are available on the treatment of such lesions. As surgery may be the mainstay of treatment for patients with resectable and localized metastatic spread, previous case reports and case series suggest radiosurgery to be another viable treatment modality. This multicenter study analyzes the efficacy and safety of robotic radiosurgery (RRS) for intramedullary metastases. Methods: Patients who received RRS for the treatment of at least one intramedullary metastasis were included. Results: Thirty-three patients with 46 intramedullary metastases were treated with a median dose of 16 Gy prescribed to a median isodose of 70%. The local control was 79% after a median follow-up of 8.5 months. The median overall survival (OS) was 11.7 months, with a 12- and 24-month OS of 47 and 31%. The 12-month progression-free survival was 42% and at 24 months 25%. In addition, 57% of patients showed either an improved or stable neurological function after treatment delivery. Systemic disease progression was the main cause of death. No significant treatment-related toxicities were observed. Conclusions: RRS appears to be a safe, time-saving and effective treatment modality for intramedullary metastases, especially for patients with unresectable lesions and high burden of disease. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop