Search Results (4)

Objectives: Odontogenic sinusitis (ODS) is common but frequently overlooked condition that differs from rhinogenic sinusitis (CRS) and should be suspected in each case of unilateral sinusitis. Clinical symptoms such as foul smell, congestion, rhinorrhea, and unilateral maxillary sinus opacification with overt dental pathology on radiological scans are more suggestive of ODS than CRS, but the distinctive microbiological flora are another clinical factor in diagnosis. The aim of this study was to compare the microbiological load of ODS and CRS and their clinical presentation for better disease recognition and its predisposing factors. Methods: Adult patients scheduled for endoscopic sinus surgery were included in the study. Clinical data and radiological images were analyzed. The otolaryngologist assessed nasal endoscopy for mucopurulence or edema in middle meatus or sinuses, whereas dental specialist confirmed or ruled out the dental cause. Microbiological samples were collected after endoscopic maxillary antrostomy. After irrigation with 0,9% saline, the aspirated rinse was collected into sterile sets and sent for culturing. Results: The study group consisted of 84 patients, 55 with CRS and 29 with ODS. Streptococcus spp prevailed in the CRS group, whereas Staphylococcus spp prevailed in the ODS group. Statistically significant differences between the groups were found in type of discharge, degree of edema, and presence of polyps. However, no statistical correlations were noted for presence of bacteria in the culture and endoscopic or radiological findings. Conclusions: ODS and CRS share some common features: ODS more often presents with purulent discharge, localized maxillary involvement, and the presence of oral pathogens, and Staphylococcus spp in microbial profile. Full article

Background/Objectives: Rhinogenic contact point headache (RCPH) is a controversial secondary headache disorder involving mucosal contact points in the nasal sinuses. The efficacy of surgical versus medical management has been debated, with some studies showing excellent long-term outcomes but others citing placebo effects. This study aimed to clarify the correlation with nasal anatomical variation detected by CT and RCPH treatment outcomes. Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted on 90 RCPH patients undergoing surgery or medical therapy. Patients were diagnosed using CT scans, endoscopy, and lidocaine testing. The surgery group had endoscopic procedures to remove contact points. The medical group received intranasal steroids. Outcomes were measured by visual analog scale (VAS) for pain and headache frequency. Predictors like age, gender, and nasal anatomical variations were analyzed. Results: The surgery group showed significant reductions in VAS scores (6.02 to 2.51, p < 0.001) and headache frequency (9.11 to 3.04, p < 0.001). The medical group did not improve significantly. All nasal subtypes improved with surgery but concha bullosa had worse VAS outcomes (4.0) than septal deviation (1.8, p < 0.001) or spur (1.73, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis found nasal anomalies predicted postoperative VAS scores (p < 0.001) but not headache frequency (p = 0.255). Conclusions: Surgery demonstrated superiority over medications for RCPH. This study provides new evidence that preoperative CT scans should be considered a non-invasive gold standard for analyzing nasal subtypes as they significantly influence surgical success, with concha bullosa associated with worse pain relief. Larger studies should validate these findings to optimize RCPH management. Full article

The maxillary sinus is a structure at the border of specialties: otorhinolaryngology and maxillofacial surgery. Due to this fact, regarding etiology, it can be affected by both the rhinogenic and odontogenic path and can impose diagnostic difficulties. The etiopathogenic mechanisms that can affect the Schneiderian membrane are mainly inflammatory, iatrogenic, traumatic, and tumorous in nature. From a microbiological point of view, the bacteriology is polymorphic, including both aerobic and anaerobic species in acute OS, the predominating species in acute OS being aerobic, and in chronic anaerobic germs. The role of fungi in the determination of this pathology and in the production of the biofilm that leads to resistance to antibiotic treatment is also discussed. The present paper aims to present the etiopathogenesis, bacteriology, clinical manifestations, as well as treatment of odontogenic sinusitis (OS) from an updated perspective through reviewing the literature. If unilateral maxillary sinusitis is usually due to odontogenic causes, this does not clinically exclude the possibility of strictly rhinogenic causes in the occurrence of sinusitis. This underlines the important role of complex oral and rhinological clinical examination as well as the role of preclinical examinations in specifying the certainty diagnosis. Simple radiography, orthopantomography, CT, and CBCT are compared in terms of diagnostic accuracy. The treatment of OS is complex, involving medication, dental, and surgical measures. The value of endoscopic surgery is emphasized, comparing its advantages over the classic Caldwell-Luc technique. Full article

The physiological behavior of paranasal sinuses depends on the potency of the ostiomeatal complex and on normal mucociliary function. The interruption of this delicate equilibrium can lead to pathological conditions such as sinusitis. Anywhere between 10% and over 25% of cases of maxillary sinusitis have an odontogenic origin, such as: dental infection; alveolar dental trauma; or iatrogenic causes, such as extractions, endodontic therapies, maxillary osteotomies or placement of endosseous implants. The resolution of sinus pathology is related to the resolution of odontogenic pathology. Aim: to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of a combined oral and endoscopic approach in the treatment of chronic odontogenic sinusitis vs. oral dental management through a case control study. Materials and Methods: all patients showing signs and symptoms of odontogenic sinusitis with obliteration (appreciable radiopacity in CT) of unilateral maxillary sinus between January 2018 and September 2019 at Padua University Hospital were enrolled in this retrospective study. The exclusion criteria were: maxillary sinusitis without odontogenic origin, or resolution with a systemic antibiotic therapy; and presence of anatomical abnormalities that promote the onset of rhinosinusitis. The patients were divided into two groups: one group was treated with a combined surgical approach under general anesthesia (Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery-FESS and simultaneous closure of oroantral communication with Bichat’s fat pad advancement); while the other group was treated only with an intraoral approach under local anesthesia and conscious sedation (closure of oroantral communication with Bichat’s fat pad advancement). The variable “success of the surgical procedure” in the two groups was compared by a Student test (with p < 0.05). Results: among the patients enrolled, 10 patients (aged between 42 and 70) made up the case group and the other 10 patients (aged between 51 and 74) constituted the control group. There was no statistically significant difference in success between the two groups (p < 0.025). Conclusions: according to this case study, an exclusive annotation invasive intraoral approach seemed to be comparable to the transoral endoscopic combined method. However, during diagnosis it is necessary and fundamental to distinguish between odontogenic and rhinogenic sinusitis in order for the resolution of odontogenic sinusitis to be achieved. Full article