Search Results (3)

Background: There is an ongoing debate about the role of perioperative chemotherapy in retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of perioperative chemotherapy in subtypes of RPS that are considered chemosensitive, including retroperitoneal angiosarcoma, undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma, myxoid liposarcoma, spindle cell sarcoma, and synovial sarcoma. Methods: This is a population-based retrospective cohort study. Patients with localized retroperitoneal sarcoma who underwent surgery were included from the US National Cancer Database (NCDB). After propensity score matching for the factors age, sex, grade, margin status, and tumor size, multivariable logistic and Cox regression analyses were used to identify factors associated with systemic therapy and their potential impact on the survival of patients with localized RPS. Results: We included 851 patients who underwent surgery between 2004 and 2020 (85% white, 41% female, and mean age 62 years). Of those, 227 patients (26.7%) received perioperative chemotherapy. In multivariable logistic regression, age ≤ 60 and tumor grading GIII/IV vs. GI/II were associated with a higher probability of receiving perioperative chemotherapy. After propensity score matching, we detected no difference in overall survival between patients who received chemotherapy and those who did not (HR 0.89, CI 0.55–1.43; and log-rank p = 0.92). Patient age ≤80 and tumor grading GI/II vs. GIII/IV were associated with improved overall survival. Conclusions: In this large analysis, the use of perioperative chemotherapy was not associated with improved survival in rare, chemosensitive subtypes of retroperitoneal sarcoma. However, selection bias must be considered when interpreting these findings. Full article

This detailed review focuses on retroperitoneal undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS), a particularly aggressive soft-tissue sarcoma that poses unique diagnostic and therapeutic challenges due to its rarity and complex presentation. By documenting a new case of retroperitoneal UPS and conducting a comprehensive review of all known cases, this article aims to expand the existing body of knowledge on the epidemiology, molecular pathogenesis, and treatment strategies associated with this rare disease. The complexity of diagnosing UPS is emphasized given that it rarely occurs in the retroperitoneal space and its histological and molecular complexity often complicates its recognition. This review highlights the need for specialized diagnostic approaches, including advanced imaging techniques and histopathological studies, to accurately diagnose and stage the disease. In terms of treatment, this paper advocates a multidisciplinary approach that combines surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy and tailors it to individual patients to optimize treatment outcomes. This review highlights case studies that illustrate the effectiveness of surgical intervention in the treatment of these tumors and emphasize the importance of achieving clear surgical margins to prevent recurrence. Furthermore, this review discusses the potential of new molecular targets and the need for innovative therapies that could bring new hope to patients affected by this challenging sarcoma. Full article

With the exception of well-differentiated liposarcoma, dedifferentiated liposarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, solitary fibrous tumour, malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumour, and undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma, the majority of the ≈70 histologic subtypes of retroperitoneal sarcoma are defined as ‘ultra-rare’ sarcomas, with an incidence of ≤1–5/1,000,000 persons/year. For most of these ultra-rare RPS subtypes, diagnosis and treatment follows international guidelines for the management of more common RPS histologies, with en bloc surgical resection as the mainstay of curative treatment, and enrolment in clinical trials where possible. Because the treatment of RPS is heavily driven by histology, the surgeon must be familiar with specific issues related to the diagnosis and management of ultra-rare sarcoma subtypes. Expert radiological and surgeon reviews are required to differentiate similarly presenting tumours where surgery can be avoided (e.g., angiomyolipoma), or where upfront systemic therapy is indicated (e.g., extraosseous Ewing’s sarcoma). Thus, the management of all retroperitoneal sarcomas should occur at a sarcoma referral centre, with a multidisciplinary team of experts dedicated to the surgical and medical management of these rare tumours. In this focused review, we highlight how diagnosis and management of the ultra-rare primary RPS histologies of malignant perivascular epithelioid cell tumour (PEComa), extraosseous Ewing sarcoma (EES), extraosseous osteosarcoma (EOS), and rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) critically diverge from the management of more common RPS subtypes. Full article