Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (2)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = proximal focal femoral deficiency (PFFD)

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
15 pages, 6480 KiB  
Case Report
The Significance and Limitations of Pre- and Postnatal Imaging in the Diagnosis and Management of Proximal Focal Femoral Deficiency
by Aaron C. Llanes, Emma Venard, Sean Youn, Dane Van Tassel, Luis F. Goncalves and Mohan V. Belthur
Diagnostics 2025, 15(11), 1302; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15111302 - 22 May 2025
Viewed by 552
Abstract
Background and Clinical Significance: Proximal femoral focal deficiency (PFFD), also referred to as congenital femoral deficiency, is a longitudinal limb deficiency and birth defect that affects the lower extremity including the hip and femur, resulting in a deformed and shortened limb. It [...] Read more.
Background and Clinical Significance: Proximal femoral focal deficiency (PFFD), also referred to as congenital femoral deficiency, is a longitudinal limb deficiency and birth defect that affects the lower extremity including the hip and femur, resulting in a deformed and shortened limb. It can be diagnosed and classified using a combination of imaging modalities, including radiographs, ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging and computerized tomography. It is crucial to characterize this birth defect in the prenatal period to appropriately prepare parents through counseling. Postnatal imaging should be performed to confirm the diagnosis, prognosticate and predict the patient’s course for treatment and management. Close follow-up and family/patient-centered care contribute to optimized patient outcomes. Case Presentation: Here, we present a series of three cases of varying PFFD severity and presentation, detailing the evaluation process, the limitations and value of imaging, and the treatment outcomes of these patients. Each case has a different PFFD classification and treatment strategy that we utilized according to the data that we attained through continuous patient care and discussion. Conclusions: We highlight the difficulties in identifying and classifying PFFD in the prenatal period while demonstrating how postnatal imaging clarified the diagnosis and informed appropriate counseling and treatment. Close follow-up and the length of patient continuity allowed us to maximize patient outcomes despite the variety in PFFD presentation and severity. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Fetal Imaging)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 2497 KiB  
Article
Can Adding BMP2 Improve Outcomes in Patients Undergoing the SUPERhip Procedure?
by Dror Paley, Claire E. Shannon, Monica Nogueira, Catharina Chiari and Matthew Harris
Children 2021, 8(6), 495; https://doi.org/10.3390/children8060495 - 10 Jun 2021
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 3083
Abstract
Congenital femoral deficiency (CFD) Paley type 1b is characterized by severe bony deformity of the upper femur, extra-articular contractures of the hip, and, delayed ossification of the femoral neck and/or subtrochanteric region. The Systematic Utilitarian Procedure for Extremity Reconstruction of the hip [...] Read more.
Congenital femoral deficiency (CFD) Paley type 1b is characterized by severe bony deformity of the upper femur, extra-articular contractures of the hip, and, delayed ossification of the femoral neck and/or subtrochanteric region. The Systematic Utilitarian Procedure for Extremity Reconstruction of the hip (SUPERhip) procedure for the correction of CFD deformities was developed in 1997. Initially, a non-fixed angle device (rush rod) was used for fixation. Late complications of persistent delayed ossification and recurrent varus deformity occurred. In order to reduce and treat such complications, fixation with a fixed angle device and the off-label use of BMP2 to induce ossification of the un-ossified femoral neck were employed. The purpose of this study is to determine if the use of a fixed angle device, and, BMP2 inserted into a drill hole in the cartilage of the femoral neck, decreases the incidence of these late complications. We retrospectively reviewed 72 SUPERhip procedures performed for Paley type 1b CFD between 1997 and 2012. Due to recurrent varus or persistent delayed ossification of the femoral neck, 34 revision SUPERhip procedures were performed. In total, 106 SUPERhip procedures were studied. Sixty-eight SUPERhips were performed using internal fixation without BMP2, while 38 SUPERhips were performed with both internal fixation and the addition of BMP2. Forty-one were performed using non-fixed angle internal fixation while 65 had fixed angle internal fixation. Fixed angle devices significantly reduced the incidence of recurrent varus compared with non-fixed angle devices. Inserting BMP2 in the femoral neck significantly reduced the incidence of persistent delayed ossification. Using only a fixed angle device but no BMP2 did not reduce the incidence of delayed ossification. The combination of both a fixed angle device and BMP2 reduced the incidence of recurrent coxa vara and persistent delayed ossification of the femoral neck. The SUPERhip procedure corrects the pathoanatomy of the proximal femur in CFD Paley type 1b but is associated with a very high risk of recurrence of coxa vara and persistence of femoral neck delayed ossification, unless, a fixed angle internal fixation device is used to prevent recurrent coxa vara and BMP2 is used to induce ossification of the femoral neck. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Pediatric Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop