Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (6)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = popliteal sciatic nerve block

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
16 pages, 5296 KB  
Article
Sciatic Nerve Bifurcation and Anatomical Reference Points: Diagnostic and Clinical Implications
by Mehmet Aydin, Cemre Savaşan, Mehmet Yilmaz, Ege Ozkubat, Gokcen Emmez, Alp Bayramoglu and Tulin Sen Esmer
Diagnostics 2026, 16(16), 2522; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16162522 - 10 Aug 2026
Abstract
Background/Objectives: The level of the sciatic nerve bifurcation is clinically relevant for diagnostic ultrasonography, ultrasound-guided popliteal sciatic nerve block, posterior-thigh interventions, and surgical approaches to the hip, thigh, and popliteal region. Although the sciatic nerve is classically described as dividing near the popliteal [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: The level of the sciatic nerve bifurcation is clinically relevant for diagnostic ultrasonography, ultrasound-guided popliteal sciatic nerve block, posterior-thigh interventions, and surgical approaches to the hip, thigh, and popliteal region. Although the sciatic nerve is classically described as dividing near the popliteal fossa, its terminal branching level may vary considerably. This study aimed to evaluate the level of sciatic nerve bifurcation and its morphometric relationship to clinically relevant anatomical landmarks, with particular emphasis on the posterior intercondylar reference line. Methods: This study was conducted on 56 formalin-fixed adult human lower-extremity specimens. The bifurcation level was categorized as femoral-level, gluteal-level, or separate emergence of the tibial and common fibular components. The sciatic nerve–piriformis relationship was assessed according to the Beaton and Anson classification. Morphometric measurements were obtained from the bifurcation point to the greater trochanter, ischial tuberosity, and posterior intercondylar reference line. Results: Femoral-level bifurcation was observed in 51 of 56 specimens (91.1%), gluteal-level bifurcation in 1 specimen (1.8%), and separate emergence in 4 specimens (7.1%). Type A was the predominant Beaton and Anson pattern, observed in 50 specimens (89.3%). Type B and Type D were each observed in 2 specimens (3.6%), and 2 specimens (3.6%) demonstrated an atypical superior gemellus-related course. All measurable bifurcation points were located proximal to the posterior intercondylar reference line. Among femoral-level bifurcations, the mean distance from this line to the bifurcation point was 8.67 ± 4.89 cm. No statistically significant sex- or side-based differences were observed in the available morphometric parameters. Conclusions: Sciatic nerve bifurcation most commonly occurred at the femoral level, but clinically relevant variations were observed. The posterior intercondylar reference line may provide a useful distal femoral orientation landmark for posterior knee and distal thigh assessment. However, it should complement, rather than replace, direct ultrasonographic visualization of the sciatic nerve and its terminal branches. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Clinical Diagnosis and Prognosis)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 872 KB  
Article
Comparing Different Multimodal Analgesia Protocols for Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty—A Retrospective Cohort Analysis
by Otto Koczian, Harald Winkler, Nelly Zental, Moritz M. Innmann, Fabian Westhauser, Tilman Walker, Dania Fischer, Markus A. Weigand and Sebastian O. Decker
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(14), 4079; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13144079 - 12 Jul 2024
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 3781
Abstract
Background: Several local regional anesthesia regimes have been described in the literature to reduce post-surgical pain following total knee arthroplasty (TKA), but it is unclear which regime has the best analgetic effect combined with the best motor function. The aim of this study [...] Read more.
Background: Several local regional anesthesia regimes have been described in the literature to reduce post-surgical pain following total knee arthroplasty (TKA), but it is unclear which regime has the best analgetic effect combined with the best motor function. The aim of this study was to determine if patients with infiltration between the popliteal artery and capsule of the posterior knee (IPACK) combined with an adductor canal block (SACB) had less pain, better motor function, and less opioid consumption after TKA than patients with a femoral nerve block (FNB) combined with a popliteal sciatic nerve block (PSB). Methods: In a retrospective cohort analysis, 342 patients following primary TKA were examined; 175 patients were treated with an IPACK combined with a SACB, and 167 patients with a femoral FNB combined with a PSB. The outcome parameters postoperative pain (visual analogue scale (VAS) for mobilization and at rest, functional recovery, opioid consumption, hospital discharge, and complications were analyzed and compared between both groups. Results: The IPACK/SACB group had a higher postoperative need for opioids despite higher doses of ropivacaine compared to the FNB/PSB group, accompanied by higher VAS scores. Patients’ satisfaction was equal between the groups. Both groups showed comparable mobilization rates and walking distances following TKA. Conclusions: IPACK/SACB showed equal results compared to FNB/PSB for mobilization rates and patients’ satisfaction following TKA without a reduction in opioid consumption. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Knee Replacement Surgery: Latest Advances and Prospects)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1993 KB  
Review
Nanotechnology for Pain Management
by Jacques E. Chelly, Shiv K. Goel, Jeremy Kearns, Orkun Kopac and Senthilkumar Sadhasivam
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(9), 2611; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13092611 - 29 Apr 2024
Cited by 16 | Viewed by 7180
Abstract
Introduction: In the context of the current opioid crisis, non-pharmacologic approaches to pain management have been considered important alternatives to the use of opioids or analgesics. Advancements in nano and quantum technology have led to the development of several nanotransporters, including nanoparticles, [...] Read more.
Introduction: In the context of the current opioid crisis, non-pharmacologic approaches to pain management have been considered important alternatives to the use of opioids or analgesics. Advancements in nano and quantum technology have led to the development of several nanotransporters, including nanoparticles, micelles, quantum dots, liposomes, nanofibers, and nano-scaffolds. These modes of nanotransporters have led to the development of new drug formulations. In pain medicine, new liposome formulations led to the development of DepoFoam™ introduced by Pacira Pharmaceutical, Inc. (Parsippany, NJ, USA). This formulation is the base of DepoDur™, which comprises a combination of liposomes and extended-release morphine, and Exparel™, which comprises a combination of liposomes and extended-release bupivacaine. In 2021, Heron Therapeutics (San Diego, CA, USA) created Zynrelef™, a mixture of bupivacaine and meloxicam. Advancements in nanotechnology have led to the development of devices/patches containing millions of nanocapacitors. Data suggest that these nanotechnology-based devices/patches reduce acute and chronic pain. Methods: Google and PubMed searches were conducted to identify studies, case reports, and reviews of medical nanotechnology applications with a special focus on acute and chronic pain. This search was based on the use of keywords like nanotechnology, nano and quantum technology, nanoparticles, micelles, quantum dots, liposomes, nanofibers, nano-scaffolds, acute and chronic pain, and analgesics. This review focuses on the role of nanotechnology in acute and chronic pain. Results: (1) Nanotechnology-based transporters. DepoDur™, administered epidurally in 15, 20, or 25 mg single doses, has been demonstrated to produce significant analgesia lasting up to 48 h. Exparel™ is infiltrated at the surgical site at the recommended dose of 106 mg for bunionectomy, 266 mg for hemorrhoidectomy, 133 mg for shoulder surgery, and 266 mg for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Exparel™ is also approved for peripheral nerve blocks, including interscalene, sciatic at the popliteal fossa, and adductor canal blocks. The injection of Exparel™ is usually preceded by an injection of plain bupivacaine to initiate analgesia before bupivacaine is released in enough quantity from the depofoarm to be pharmacodynamically effective. Finally, Zynrelef™ is applied at the surgical site during closure. It was initially approved for open inguinal hernia, abdominal surgery requiring a small-to-medium incision, foot surgery, and TKA. (2) Nanotechnology-based devices/patches. Two studies support the use of nanocapacitor-based devices/patches for the management of acute and chronic pain. A randomized study conducted on patients undergoing unilateral primary total knee (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) provided insight into the potential value of nanocapacitor-based technology for the control of postoperative acute pain. The results were based on 2 studies, one observational and one randomized. The observational study was conducted in 128 patients experiencing chronic pain for at least one year. This study suggested that compared to baseline, the application of a nanocapacitor-based Kailo™ pain relief patch on the pain site for 30 days led to a time-dependent decrease in pain and analgesic use and an increase in well-being. The randomized study compared the effects of standard of care treatment to those of the same standard of care approach plus the use of two nanocapacitor-based device/patches (NeuroCuple™ device) placed in the recovery room and kept in place for three days. The study demonstrated that the use of the two NeuroCuple™ devices was associated with a 41% reduction in pain at rest and a 52% decrease in the number of opioid refills requested by patients over the first 30 days after discharge from the hospital. Discussion: For the management of pain, the use of nano-based technology has led to the development of nano transporters, especially focus on the use of liposome and nanocapacitors. The use of liposome led to the development of DepoDur™, bupivacaine Exparel™ and a mixture of bupivacaine and meloxicam (Zynrelef™) and more recently lidocaine liposome formulation. In these cases, the technology is used to prolong the duration of action of drugs included in the preparation. Another indication of nanotechnology is the development of nanocapacitor device or patches. Although, data obtained with the use of nanocapacitors are still limited, evidence suggests that the use of nanocapacitors devices/patches may be interesting for the treatment of both acute and chronic pain, since the studies conducted with the NeuroCuple™ device and the based Kailo™ pain relief patch were not placebo-controlled, it is clear that additional placebo studies are required to confirm these preliminary results. Therefore, the development of a placebo devices/patches is necessary. Conclusions: Increasing evidence supports the concept that nanotechnology may represent a valuable tool as a drug transporter including liposomes and as a nanocapacitor-based device/patch to reduce or even eliminate the use of opioids in surgical patients. However, more studies are required to confirm this concept, especially with the use of nanotechnology incorporated in devices/patches. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

153 KB  
Article
Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Popliteal Sciatic Block Properties in Diabetic and Nondiabetic Patients
by Havva Kocayigit, Fatih Şahin, Alper Erkin and Ali Fuat Erdem
J. Am. Podiatr. Med. Assoc. 2023, 113(3), 22028; https://doi.org/10.7547/22-028 - 1 May 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 116
Abstract
Background: We aim to share our popliteal sciatic nerve block (PSB) experience, which we applied to diabetic and nondiabetic patients in the operating room of our hospital. Methods: The patients who underwent PSB for foot and ankle surgery between October 1, 2021, and [...] Read more.
Background: We aim to share our popliteal sciatic nerve block (PSB) experience, which we applied to diabetic and nondiabetic patients in the operating room of our hospital. Methods: The patients who underwent PSB for foot and ankle surgery between October 1, 2021, and December 31, 2021, in Sakarya University Training and Research Hospital were evaluated retrospectively. All nerve blocks were administered by a single anesthesiologist. Demographic data of the patients and the duration of the operation, the type of operation, the time of application of the nerve block, whether it was single or bifurcation block, and the onset times of motor and sensory block were also recorded in the perioperative period. Results: It was determined that PSB was applied to 49 patients over a 3-month period. The mean age of the patients was 61.33 6 14.03 years, and 12 patients (24.5%) were women. The reason why the patients were operated on was amputation in 21 (42.9%) and wound debridement in 27 (55.1%). There were 37 patients in the diabetic group and 12 patients in the nondiabetic group. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of demographic data and operation characteristics, but it was observed that there was a significant difference in both sensory and motor block formation times between the two groups (P , .001). Conclusions: In conclusion, we think that popliteal sciatic nerve block is easy to apply, the complication rate is low, and it is a suitable anesthesia method for patients who will undergo day surgery for foot ulcer. (J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 113(3), 2023) Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

8 pages, 920 KB  
Article
Ultrasound-Guided Popliteal Nerve Block with Short-Acting Lidocaine in the Surgical Treatment of Ingrown Toenails
by Beom Suk Kim, Kyungho Kim, Jonathan Day, Jesse Seilern Und Aspang and Jaeyoung Kim
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(10), 5059; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18105059 - 11 May 2021
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 4201
Abstract
Background: Digital nerve block (DB) is a commonly utilized anesthetic procedure in ingrown toenail surgery. However, severe procedure-related pain has been reported. Although the popliteal sciatic nerve block (PB) is widely accepted in foot and ankle surgery, its use in ingrown toenail surgery [...] Read more.
Background: Digital nerve block (DB) is a commonly utilized anesthetic procedure in ingrown toenail surgery. However, severe procedure-related pain has been reported. Although the popliteal sciatic nerve block (PB) is widely accepted in foot and ankle surgery, its use in ingrown toenail surgery has not been reported. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the safety and effectiveness of PB in the surgical treatment of ingrown toenails. Methods: One-hundred-ten patients surgically treated for an ingrown toenail were enrolled. Sixty-six patients underwent DB, and 44 underwent PB. PB was performed under ultrasound-guidance via a 22-gauge needle with 15 mL of 1% lidocaine in the popliteal region. The visual analogue scale was used to assess pain at two-time points: pain with skin penetration and pain with the solution injection. Time to sensory block, duration of sensory block, need for additional injections, and adverse events were recorded. Results: PB group demonstrated significantly lower procedure-related pain than the DB group. Time to sensory block was significantly longer in the PB group (20.8 ± 4.6 versus 6.5 ± 1.6 minutes). The sensory block duration was significantly longer in the PB group (187.9 ± 22.0 versus 106.5 ± 19.1 minutes). Additional injections were required in 16 (24.2%) DB cases, while no additional injections were required in PB cases. Four adverse events occurred in the DB group and two in the PB group. Conclusion: PB was a less painful anesthetic procedure associated with a longer sensory block duration and fewer repeat injections compared with DB. The result of this study implicates that PB can be an alternative anesthetic option in the surgical treatment of ingrown toenails. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Foot Disorders and Its Treatment)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 672 KB  
Article
Effect of Intraoperative Sedation with Dexmedetomidine Versus Propofol on Acute Postoperative Pain Following Major Foot Surgery under Popliteal Sciatic Nerve Block: A Randomized Controlled Trial
by RyungA Kang, Ji Won Choi, Ki-Sun Sung, Wongook Wi, Tae Soo Hahm, Hyun Sung Cho, Mi Kyung Yang and Justin Sangwook Ko
J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9(3), 654; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9030654 - 28 Feb 2020
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 4067
Abstract
Intravenous (IV) dexmedetomidine is reported to prolong analgesia following peripheral nerve blocks. Popliteal sciatic nerve block provides effective postoperative analgesia, but some patients still experience severe pain during the early postoperative period. We aimed to evaluate the postoperative analgesic effects of IV dexmedetomidine [...] Read more.
Intravenous (IV) dexmedetomidine is reported to prolong analgesia following peripheral nerve blocks. Popliteal sciatic nerve block provides effective postoperative analgesia, but some patients still experience severe pain during the early postoperative period. We aimed to evaluate the postoperative analgesic effects of IV dexmedetomidine versus propofol in patients undergoing foot surgeries under popliteal sciatic nerve block. Forty patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive either IV propofol (n = 20) or IV dexmedetomidine (n = 20) for intraoperative sedation. All the patients received continuous popliteal sciatic nerve block. The corresponding drug infusion rate was adjusted to achieve a modified observer’s assessment of alertness/sedation score of 3 or 4. The primary outcome was postoperative cumulative opioid consumption during the first 24 h after surgery. Thirty-nine patients were analyzed. The median (interquartile ranges) postoperative cumulative opioid consumption during the first 24 h after surgery was significantly lower in the dexmedetomidine group (15 (7.5–16.9) mg) than in the propofol group (17.5 (15–25) mg) (p = 0.019). The time to first rescue analgesic request was significantly greater in the dexmedetomidine group than in the propofol group (11.8 ± 2.2 h vs. 10.0 ± 2.7 h, p = 0.030) without the prolonged motor blockade (p = 0.321). Intraoperative sedation with dexmedetomidine reduced postoperative opioid consumption and prolonged analgesic duration after a popliteal sciatic nerve block. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Anesthesiology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop