Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (3)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = patent knowledge graph reasoning

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
18 pages, 2264 KiB  
Article
Combining Semantic and Structural Features for Reasoning on Patent Knowledge Graphs
by Liyuan Zhang, Kaitao Hu, Xianghua Ma and Xiangyu Sun
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(15), 6807; https://doi.org/10.3390/app14156807 - 4 Aug 2024
Viewed by 2010
Abstract
To address the limitations in capturing complex semantic features between entities and the incomplete acquisition of entity and relationship information by existing patent knowledge graph reasoning algorithms, we propose a reasoning method that integrates semantic and structural features for patent knowledge graphs, denoted [...] Read more.
To address the limitations in capturing complex semantic features between entities and the incomplete acquisition of entity and relationship information by existing patent knowledge graph reasoning algorithms, we propose a reasoning method that integrates semantic and structural features for patent knowledge graphs, denoted as SS-DSA. Initially, to facilitate the model representation of patent information, a directed graph representation model based on the patent knowledge graph is designed. Subsequently, structural information within the knowledge graph is mined using inductive learning, which is combined with the learning of graph structural features. Finally, an attention mechanism is employed to integrate the scoring results, enhancing the accuracy of reasoning outcomes such as patent classification, latent inter-entity relationships, and new knowledge inference. Experimental results demonstrate that the improved algorithm achieves an up to approximately 30% increase in the MRR index compared to the ComplEx model in the public Dataset 1; in Dataset 2, the MRR and Hits@n indexes, respectively, saw maximal improvements of nearly 30% and 112% when compared with MLMLM and ComplEx models; in Dataset 3, the MRR and Hits@n indexes realized maximal enhancements of nearly 200% and 40% in comparison with the MLMLM model. This effectively proves the efficacy of the refined model in the reasoning process. Compared to recently widely applied reasoning algorithms, it offers a superior capability in addressing complex structures within the datasets and accomplishing the completion of existing patent knowledge graphs. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 7013 KiB  
Article
Exploring Potential R&D Collaboration Partners Using Embedding of Patent Graph
by Juhyun Lee, Sangsung Park and Junseok Lee
Sustainability 2023, 15(20), 14724; https://doi.org/10.3390/su152014724 - 11 Oct 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1746
Abstract
Rapid market change is one of the reasons for accelerating a technology lifecycle. Enterprises have socialized, externalized, combined, and internalized knowledge for their survival. However, the current era requires ambidextrous innovation through the diffusion of knowledge from enterprises. Accordingly, enterprises have discovered sustainable [...] Read more.
Rapid market change is one of the reasons for accelerating a technology lifecycle. Enterprises have socialized, externalized, combined, and internalized knowledge for their survival. However, the current era requires ambidextrous innovation through the diffusion of knowledge from enterprises. Accordingly, enterprises have discovered sustainable resources and increased market value through collaborations with research institutions and universities. Such collaborative activities effectively improve enterprise innovation, economic growth, and national competence. However, as such collaborations are conducted continuously and iteratively, their effect has gradually weakened. Therefore, we focus on exploring potential R&D collaboration partners through patents co-owned by enterprises, research institutions, and universities. The business pattern of co-applicants is extracted through a patent graph, and potential R&D collaboration partners are unearthed. In this paper, we propose a method of converting a co-applicant-based graph into a vector using representation learning. Our purpose is to explore potential R&D collaboration partners from the similarity between vectors. Compared to other methods, the proposed method contributes to discovering potential R&D collaboration partners based on organizational features. The following questions are considered in order to discover potential R&D partners in collaborative activities: Can information about co-applicants of patents satisfactorily explain R&D collaboration? Conversely, can potential R&D collaboration partners be discovered from co-applicants? To answer these questions, we conducted experiments using autonomous-driving-related patents. We verified that our proposed method can explore potential R&D collaboration partners with high accuracy through experiments. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Sustainable Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

27 pages, 3025 KiB  
Article
Integration Strategy and Tool between Formal Ontology and Graph Database Technology
by Stefano Ferilli
Electronics 2021, 10(21), 2616; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10212616 - 26 Oct 2021
Cited by 28 | Viewed by 4333
Abstract
Ontologies, and especially formal ones, have traditionally been investigated as a means to formalize an application domain so as to carry out automated reasoning on it. The union of the terminological part of an ontology and the corresponding assertional part is known as [...] Read more.
Ontologies, and especially formal ones, have traditionally been investigated as a means to formalize an application domain so as to carry out automated reasoning on it. The union of the terminological part of an ontology and the corresponding assertional part is known as a Knowledge Graph. On the other hand, database technology has often focused on the optimal organization of data so as to boost efficiency in their storage, management and retrieval. Graph databases are a recent technology specifically focusing on element-driven data browsing rather than on batch processing. While the complementarity and connections between these technologies are patent and intuitive, little exists to bring them to full integration and cooperation. This paper aims at bridging this gap, by proposing an intermediate format that can be easily mapped onto the formal ontology on one hand, so as to allow complex reasoning, and onto the graph database on the other, so as to benefit from efficient data handling. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Knowledge Engineering and Data Mining)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop