Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

remove_circle_outline

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (2)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = pantograph sinking platform

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
14 pages, 6149 KB  
Article
Numerical Comparison in Aerodynamic Drag and Noise of High-Speed Pantographs with or without Platform Sinking
by Tingting Dong and Tian Li
Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(10), 6213; https://doi.org/10.3390/app13106213 - 19 May 2023
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 2179
Abstract
Flat roofs and platform sinking are two common installation configurations for high-speed pantographs. The cavity formed by the platform sinking is a potential source of aerodynamic drag and noise. In this paper, the shape of the rectangular cavity is optimized, and the aerodynamic [...] Read more.
Flat roofs and platform sinking are two common installation configurations for high-speed pantographs. The cavity formed by the platform sinking is a potential source of aerodynamic drag and noise. In this paper, the shape of the rectangular cavity is optimized, and the aerodynamic performance of the high-speed pantograph with or without platform sinking is compared and discussed based on the optimized cavity results. The flow field and sound propagation are predicted by the improved delayed detached eddy simulation (IDDES) method and the FW-H equation. The results show that the rectangular cavity produces the largest aerodynamic drag and radiation noise. The upstream, downstream, and bottom surfaces of the cavity can be optimized by rounded and sloped edges to reduce aerodynamic drag and noise. The unstable shear flow and recirculation zone formed by flow separation and reattachment can be reduced by modifying the upstream and downstream surfaces of the cavity. In addition, the vortex in front of the downstream surface of the cavity can be reduced or even eliminated by modifying the bottom surface. When the upstream and downstream surfaces of the cavity are rounded and the bottom surface is sloped (R/H = 0.8), the aerodynamic performance of the cavity is better. Compared with the pantograph installed on the flat roof, the aerodynamic drag and noise of the pantograph with platform sinking are significantly reduced due to the shielding of the lower structure by the cavity, and the total drag and noise are reduced by 5.22% and 1.45 dBA, respectively. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Acoustics and Vibrations)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 5586 KB  
Article
Numerical Study on the Aeroacoustic Performance of Different Diversion Strategies in the Pantograph Area of High-Speed Trains at 400 km/h
by Hongkang Liu, Siqi Zhou, Rongrong Chen, Zhuolun Li, Shishang Zhang and Yatian Zhao
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(21), 10702; https://doi.org/10.3390/app122110702 - 22 Oct 2022
Cited by 12 | Viewed by 2460
Abstract
The speed increase in high-speed trains is a critical procedure in the promotion of high-speed railway technology. As an indispensable and complex structure of high-speed trains, the pantograph’s aerodynamic drag and noise is a significant limitation in the speed increase process of high-speed [...] Read more.
The speed increase in high-speed trains is a critical procedure in the promotion of high-speed railway technology. As an indispensable and complex structure of high-speed trains, the pantograph’s aerodynamic drag and noise is a significant limitation in the speed increase process of high-speed trains. In the present study, the hybrid method of large eddy simulation (LES) and Ffowcs Williams-Hawkings (FW-H) acoustic analogy is applied to analyze the aerodynamic and aeroacoustic performances of pantograph installed in different ways, i.e., sinking platform and fairing. The results of simulation show that the application of pantograph fairing can reduce the aerodynamic drag greatly. In addition, compared with the pantographs installed alone on the train roof, the installation of the sinking platform brings about 2 dBA reduction in sound pressure level (SPL). Meanwhile, the utilization of the pantograph fairing mainly decreases the noise in the frequency band above 1000 Hz and the largest SPL reduction is up to 3 dBA among the monitoring points. Further analysis shows that the influence of different diversion strategies on the spectral characteristics actually attenuates the dominant frequency of the panhead. In the horizontal plane, the noise directivity of the pantograph installed with a fairing is similar to the pantograph installed alone on the train roof. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Aerodynamic Noise Research of High Speed Trains)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop