Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (11)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = pancreatobiliary endoscopy

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
3 pages, 215 KiB  
Editorial
Latest Advances in Pancreatobiliary Endoscopy
by Marco Spadaccini and Alessandro Fugazza
Medicina 2025, 61(3), 550; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61030550 - 20 Mar 2025
Viewed by 480
Abstract
The field of biliopancreatic endoscopy has witnessed transformative advancements, driven by technological innovations, novel techniques, and an evolving understanding of disease processes [...] Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Latest Advances in Pancreatobiliary Endoscopy)
13 pages, 1581 KiB  
Article
Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Anastomoses of the Gastrointestinal Tract: A Multicentric Experience
by Giacomo Emanuele Maria Rizzo, Chiara Coluccio, Edoardo Forti, Alessandro Fugazza, Cecilia Binda, Giuseppe Vanella, Francesco Maria Di Matteo, Stefano Francesco Crinò, Andrea Lisotti, Marcello Fabio Maida, Giovanni Aragona, Aurelio Mauro, Alessandro Repici, Andrea Anderloni, Carlo Fabbri, Ilaria Tarantino and on behalf of the I-EUS Group
Cancers 2025, 17(5), 910; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17050910 - 6 Mar 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1168
Abstract
This multicenter retrospective study included patients undergoing EUS-guided GI anastomoses from 2016 to 2023. Indications for EUS-guided anastomosis were GOO, ALS or patients with altered anatomy needing endoscopic interventions. The primary outcome was technical success, while secondary outcomes included clinical success, safety, lumen-apposing [...] Read more.
This multicenter retrospective study included patients undergoing EUS-guided GI anastomoses from 2016 to 2023. Indications for EUS-guided anastomosis were GOO, ALS or patients with altered anatomy needing endoscopic interventions. The primary outcome was technical success, while secondary outcomes included clinical success, safety, lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) patency, and the need for reinterventions. A total of 216 patients (mean age 64.5 [±13.94] years; 49.1% males) were included. In total, 149 cases (69%) were GOO, 44 (20.4%) cases were bilioenteric anastomotic strictures or lithiasis in altered anatomy, 14 cases (6.5%) were ALS, and 9 patients (4.2%) were for ERCP in altered anatomy after EUS-GG. Overall, EUS-GE was performed in 181 patients (83.8%), EUS-JJ in 44 cases (20.4%), and EUS-GG in 10 (4.6%). Technical success was 94.91%, and clinical success was 93.66%. The adverse event (AE) rate was 11.1%. The reintervention rate was 7.69%. The median follow-up was 85 days. In conclusions, EUS-guided GI anastomoses are technically feasible and safe in both malignant and benign diseases. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 11126 KiB  
Review
Development of a Dedicated X-Ray Fluoroscopic Apparatus for Therapeutic Pancreatobiliary Endoscopy: A Review
by Taito Fukuma, Shigeto Ishii, Toshio Fujisawa, Keiko Takahashi, Tadashi Nakamura, Futoshi Shibata, Ko Tomishima, Yusuke Takasaki, Akinori Suzuki, Sho Takahashi, Koichi Ito, Mako Ushio, Muneo Ikemura, Daishi Kabemura, Hiroto Ota, Yousuke Nakai, Hirofumi Kogure, Naminatsu Takahara and Hiroyuki Isayama
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(4), 1214; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14041214 - 12 Feb 2025
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 913
Abstract
In recent years, pancreaticobiliary endoscopy (PBE) has evolved to include a wide range of endoscopic procedures used to treat various diseases. Several interventional endoscopic ultrasonography procedures have been developed for conditions that cannot be treated with conventional endoscopic methods. As PBE continues to [...] Read more.
In recent years, pancreaticobiliary endoscopy (PBE) has evolved to include a wide range of endoscopic procedures used to treat various diseases. Several interventional endoscopic ultrasonography procedures have been developed for conditions that cannot be treated with conventional endoscopic methods. As PBE continues to advance, it is crucial to improve fluoroscopic systems to enhance image quality, ensure patient safety, reduce radiation exposure, and ensure the operation of video-recording systems. The difficult procedures require the precise imaging of thin pancreatic/biliary branch devices, including guidewires, catheters, and stents. It is crucial to reduce noise caused by patient breathing and movement, while retaining the necessary movement in the image on the screen. A stable table is effective for ensuring the safety of patients during the procedure. A reduction in radiation exposure is important, and the flame rate conversion technique is effective. Ensuring high-quality recording is useful for the video presentation of PBE procedures. In collaboration with Fujifilm (Tokyo, Japan), we researched and developed various functions in fluoroscopic systems for PBE. In this review, we outline the requirements for fluoroscopic procedures in PBE, the evolution of technology to date, and its prospects, while also presenting the commercial equipment currently available. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Gastroenterology & Hepatopancreatobiliary Medicine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 9517 KiB  
Review
Controversies in Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Biliary Drainage
by Christoph Frank Dietrich, Paolo Giorgio Arcidiacono, Manoop S. Bhutani, Barbara Braden, Eike Burmester, Pietro Fusaroli, Michael Hocke, Andrè Ignee, Christian Jenssen, Abed Al-Lehibi, Emad Aljahdli, Bertrand Napoléon, Mihai Rimbas and Giuseppe Vanella
Cancers 2024, 16(9), 1616; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16091616 - 23 Apr 2024
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2416
Abstract
In this 14th document in a series of papers entitled “Controversies in Endoscopic Ultrasound” we discuss various aspects of EUS-guided biliary drainage that are debated in the literature and in practice. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography is still the reference technique for therapeutic [...] Read more.
In this 14th document in a series of papers entitled “Controversies in Endoscopic Ultrasound” we discuss various aspects of EUS-guided biliary drainage that are debated in the literature and in practice. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography is still the reference technique for therapeutic biliary access, but EUS-guided techniques for biliary access and drainage have developed into safe and highly effective alternative options. However, EUS-guided biliary drainage techniques are technically demanding procedures for which few training models are currently available. Different access routes require modifications to the basic technique and specific instruments. In experienced hands, percutaneous transhepatic cholangiodrainage is also a good alternative. Therefore, in this paper, we compare arguments for different options of biliary drainage and different technical modifications. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Current Clinical Studies of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 649 KiB  
Article
Italian Survey on Endoscopic Biliary Drainage Approach in Patients with Surgically Altered Anatomy
by Aurelio Mauro, Cecilia Binda, Alessandro Fugazza, Giuseppe Vanella, Vincenzo Giorgio Mirante, Stefano Mazza, Davide Scalvini, Ilaria Tarantino, Carlo Fabbri, Andrea Anderloni and on behalf of the i-EUS Group
Medicina 2024, 60(3), 472; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60030472 - 13 Mar 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1655
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Biliary drainage (BD) in patients with surgically altered anatomy (SAA) could be obtained endoscopically with different techniques or with a percutaneous approach. Every endoscopic technique could be challenging and not clearly superior over another. The aim of this survey [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Biliary drainage (BD) in patients with surgically altered anatomy (SAA) could be obtained endoscopically with different techniques or with a percutaneous approach. Every endoscopic technique could be challenging and not clearly superior over another. The aim of this survey is to explore which is the standard BD approach in patients with SAA. Materials and Methods: A 34-question online survey was sent to different Italian tertiary and non-tertiary endoscopic centers performing interventional biliopancreatic endoscopy. The core of the survey was focused on the first-line and alternative BD approaches to SAA patients with benign or malignant obstruction. Results: Out of 70 centers, 39 answered the survey (response rate: 56%). Only 48.7% of them declared themselves to be reference centers for endoscopic BD in SAA. The total number of procedures performed per year is usually low, especially in non-tertiary centers; however, they have a low tendency to refer to more experienced centers. In the case of Billroth-II reconstruction, the majority of centers declared that they use a duodenoscope or forward-viewing scope in both benign and malignant diseases as a first approach. However, in the case of failure, the BD approach becomes extremely heterogeneous among centers without any technique prevailing over the others. Interestingly, in the case of Roux-en-Y, a significant proportion of centers declared that they choose the percutaneous approach in both benign (35.1%) and malignant obstruction (32.4%) as a first option. In the case of a previous failed attempt at BD in Roux-en-Y, the subsequent most used approach is the EUS-guided intervention in both benign and malignant indications. Conclusions: This survey shows that the endoscopic BD approach is extremely heterogeneous, especially in patients with Roux-en-Y reconstruction or after ERCP failure in Billroth-II reconstruction. Percutaneous BD is still taken into account by a significant proportion of centers in the case of Roux-en-Y anatomy. The total number of endoscopic BD procedures performed in non-tertiary centers is usually low, but this result does not correspond to an adequate rate of referral to more experienced centers. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Latest Advances in Pancreatobiliary Endoscopy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 1117 KiB  
Review
Using Endoscopy in the Diagnosis of Pancreato-Biliary Cancers
by Julia Chaves, Michael Fernandez Y Viesca and Marianna Arvanitakis
Cancers 2023, 15(13), 3385; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15133385 - 28 Jun 2023
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2342
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer and cholangiocarcinoma are life threatening oncological conditions with poor prognosis and outcome. Pancreatic cystic lesions are considered precursors of pancreatic cancer as some of them have the potential to progress to malignancy. Therefore, accurate identification and classification of these lesions is [...] Read more.
Pancreatic cancer and cholangiocarcinoma are life threatening oncological conditions with poor prognosis and outcome. Pancreatic cystic lesions are considered precursors of pancreatic cancer as some of them have the potential to progress to malignancy. Therefore, accurate identification and classification of these lesions is important to prevent the development of invasive cancer. In the biliary tract, the accurate characterization of biliary strictures is essential for providing appropriate management and avoiding unnecessary surgery. Techniques have been developed to improve the diagnosis, risk stratification, and management of pancreato-biliary lesions. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and associated techniques, such as elastography, contrasted-enhanced EUS, and EUS-guided needle confocal laser endomicroscopy, may improve diagnostic accuracy. In addition, intraductal techniques applied during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), such as new generation cholangioscopy and in vivo cellular evaluation through probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy, can increase the diagnostic yield in characterizing indeterminate biliary strictures. Both EUS-guided and intraductal approaches can provide the possibility for tissue sampling with new tools, such as needles, biopsies forceps, and brushes. At the molecular level, novel biomarkers have been explored that provide new insights into diagnosis, risk stratification, and management of these lesions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Application of Endoscopy in Gastrointestinal Cancers)
Show Figures

Figure 1

30 pages, 8581 KiB  
Review
Comments on and Illustrations of the EFSUMB CEUS Guidelines: Transabdominal and Endoscopic Ultrasound Features of Intrapancreatic Metastases and the Role of Multiparametric Imaging and EUS-Guided Sampling in Rare Pancreatic Tumors
by Kathleen Möller, Christian Jenssen, Barbara Braden, Michael Hocke, Yasunobu Yamashita, Paolo Giorgio Arcidiacono, André Ignee, Mirko D’Onofrio, Pietro Fusaroli, Manoop S. Bhutani, Yi Dong, Siyu Sun, Siegbert Faiss and Christoph F. Dietrich
Cancers 2023, 15(9), 2546; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15092546 - 29 Apr 2023
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 2833
Abstract
A definite pathologic diagnosis of intrapancreatic metastasis is crucial for the management decision, i.e., curative or palliative surgery versus chemotherapy or conservative/palliative therapy. This review focuses on the appearance of intrapancreatic metastases on native and contrast-enhanced transabdominal ultrasound and endoscopic ultrasound. Differences and [...] Read more.
A definite pathologic diagnosis of intrapancreatic metastasis is crucial for the management decision, i.e., curative or palliative surgery versus chemotherapy or conservative/palliative therapy. This review focuses on the appearance of intrapancreatic metastases on native and contrast-enhanced transabdominal ultrasound and endoscopic ultrasound. Differences and similarities in relation to the primary tumor, and the differential diagnosis from pancreatic carcinoma and neuroendocrine neoplasms are described. The frequency of intrapancreatic metastases in autopsy studies and surgical resection studies will be discussed. Further emphasis is placed on endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling to confirm the diagnosis. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

8 pages, 1803 KiB  
Case Report
IgG4-Related Oesophageal Disease with Cytomegalovirus Infection: A Case Report
by Bacui Zhang, Yuexing Lai, Yongwei Xu, Jing Wang and Ping Xu
J. Pers. Med. 2023, 13(3), 493; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13030493 - 9 Mar 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2112
Abstract
Immunoglobulin G4-related disease (IgG4-RD) is a fibrous inflammatory process related to immunomodulation. The involvement of the pancreato-biliary tract, retroperitoneum/aorta, head and neck, and salivary glands are the most frequently observed disease phenotypes, differing in their epidemiological features, serological findings, and prognostic outcomes. IgG4-RD [...] Read more.
Immunoglobulin G4-related disease (IgG4-RD) is a fibrous inflammatory process related to immunomodulation. The involvement of the pancreato-biliary tract, retroperitoneum/aorta, head and neck, and salivary glands are the most frequently observed disease phenotypes, differing in their epidemiological features, serological findings, and prognostic outcomes. IgG4-RD was combined with oesophageal ulcers, and the patients were infected with cytomegalovirus at the time of the examination. This constituted a huge challenge in the diagnosis and treatment of oesophageal ulcers. We report the case of a 53-year-old male who experienced nausea, vomiting, and anaemia recurrently for many years. According to his medical records, an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed an oesophageal ulcer, and he had had numerous hospital visits for anaemia but with no definitive diagnosis, and he had responded poorly to therapy. However, with persistent symptoms, he came to our hospital and, according to the results of the upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, a serum IgG4 test, and histopathological and immunohistochemical staining, he was finally diagnosed with IgG4-related oesophageal disease combined with a cytomegalovirus infection. We hope that through this case, we can learn more about IgG4-RD and, at the same time, give clinicians a better understanding of IgG4-RD combined with oesophageal ulceration, a new understanding of cytomegalovirus infections, and improved clinical knowledge. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Diagnosis and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Diseases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 1911 KiB  
Article
EUS-Guided Gastroenterostomy in Malignant Gastric Outlet Obstruction: A Comparative Study between First- and Second-Line Approaches after Enteral Stent Placement
by Enrique Perez-Cuadrado-Robles, Hadrien Alric, Ali Aidibi, Michiel Bronswijk, Giuseppe Vanella, Claire Gallois, Hedi Benosman, Emilia Ragot, Claire Rives-Lange, Gabriel Rahmi and Christophe Cellier
Cancers 2022, 14(22), 5516; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14225516 - 10 Nov 2022
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 3357
Abstract
Introduction: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) is increasingly used in the setting of malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO). However, little is known about the role of primary EUS-GE. The aim of the present study is to compare the outcomes of EUS-GE by using the [...] Read more.
Introduction: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) is increasingly used in the setting of malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO). However, little is known about the role of primary EUS-GE. The aim of the present study is to compare the outcomes of EUS-GE by using the freehand technique as a first- and second-line approach after enteral stenting (ES). Methods: This is an observational single-center study using a prospectively collected database. All consecutive patients who underwent an EUS-GE using the freehand technique due to malignant GOO were included. Patients with previous gastric surgery, a wire-guided EUS-GE technique, or those presenting without GOO were excluded. The primary outcome was the clinical success, defined as a solid oral intake at 1 week after the procedure (GOO Score, GOOSS ≥ 2). The secondary outcomes were technical success and adverse event (AE) rates. The impact on nutritional parameters was also assessed. Results: Forty-five patients underwent an EUS-GE for all indications. Finally, 28 patients (mean age: 63 ± 17.2 years, 57.1% male) with (n = 13, 46.4%) and without (n = 15, 53.6%) a previous ES were included. The technical success was achieved in 25 cases (89.3%), with no differences between the two groups (92.3% vs. 86.7%, p = 1). The median limb diameter and procedure time were 27 mm (range:15–48) and 37 min. Overall, clinical success was achieved in 22 cases (88%), with three failures due to AEs (n = 2) or peritoneal carcinomatosis (n = 1). The diet progression was quicker in patients with a previous ES (GOOSS at 48 h, 2 vs. 1, p = 0.023), but the GOOSS at 1 week (p = 0.299), albumin gain (p = 0.366), and BMI gain (0.257) were comparable in the two groups. The AE rate was 7.1%. Conclusions: EUS-GE achieves a high technical and clinical success in patients with GOO regardless of the presence of a previous ES. Patients with previous ES may have a quicker progression of their diet, but the GOOSS and nutritional status in the long term at 1 week or 1 month are comparable. Primary EUS-GE might require fewer procedures and less discontinuation of chemotherapy to achieve a comparable result. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

6 pages, 224 KiB  
Study Protocol
Patient Reported Experience Measure in Endoscopic Ultrasonography: The PREUS Study Protocol
by Laura Apadula, Gabriele Capurso, Alessandro Ambrosi and Paolo Giorgio Arcidiacono
Nurs. Rep. 2022, 12(1), 59-64; https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep12010007 - 8 Feb 2022
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 2455
Abstract
The evaluation of the patient’s experience is becoming increasingly important as a better patient experience can improve the quality of the health service delivered. Patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) are self-report assessment tools provided to patients about their experience during any health event. There [...] Read more.
The evaluation of the patient’s experience is becoming increasingly important as a better patient experience can improve the quality of the health service delivered. Patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) are self-report assessment tools provided to patients about their experience during any health event. There are few PREM instruments in the field of gastrointestinal endoscopy, and none is specific for endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). This study aims to develop a questionnaire to evaluate the experience of patients undergoing EUS, identifying and prioritizing the factors related to the patient’s experience. The study will consist of several phases: (A) tool creation; (B) face and content validity; (C) ranking: to evaluate the relevance of the identified questions in the previous phase; (D) questionnaire creation and validity testing. The final output will be the production of a specific tool that can be used to measure patients’ experience during EUS. This questionnaire may become a relevant part of actions taken to measure the quality of care provided to patients undergoing EUS. Furthermore, correlation between health care providers’ and patients’ views of the relevance of the included items will allow optimization of empathetic and psychological aspects. Full article
11 pages, 2578 KiB  
Article
Clinical Evaluation of a Newly Developed Guidewire for Pancreatobiliary Endoscopy
by Shigeto Ishii, Toshio Fujisawa, Hiroyuki Isayama, Shingo Asahara, Shingo Ogiwara, Hironao Okubo, Hisafumi Yamagata, Mako Ushio, Sho Takahashi, Hiroki Okawa, Wataru Yamagata, Yoshihiro Okawa, Akinori Suzuki, Yusuke Takasaki, Kazushige Ochiai, Ko Tomishima, Hiroaki Saito, Shuichiro Shiina and Takaaki Ikari
J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9(12), 4059; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9124059 - 16 Dec 2020
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2686
Abstract
Background: The guidewire (GW) plays an important role in pancreatobiliary endoscopy. GW quality is a critical factor in the effectiveness and efficiency of pancreatobiliary endoscopy. In this study, we evaluate a new 0.025 inch multipurpose endoscopic GW: the M-Through. Methods: Our study was [...] Read more.
Background: The guidewire (GW) plays an important role in pancreatobiliary endoscopy. GW quality is a critical factor in the effectiveness and efficiency of pancreatobiliary endoscopy. In this study, we evaluate a new 0.025 inch multipurpose endoscopic GW: the M-Through. Methods: Our study was a multicenter retrospective analysis. We enrolled patients who underwent endoscopic procedures using the M-Through between May 2018 and April 2020. Patients receiving the following endoscopic treatments were enrolled: common bile duct (CBD) stone extraction, endoscopic drainage for distal and hilar malignant biliary obstruction (MBO), and endoscopic drainage for acute cholecystitis. For each procedure, we examined the rate of success without GW exchange. Results: A total of 170 patients (80 with CBD stones, 60 with MBO, and 30 with cholecystitis) were enrolled. The rate of completion without GW exchange was 100% for CBD stone extraction, 83.3% for endoscopic drainage for MBO, and 43.3% for endoscopic drainage for cholecystitis. In unsuccessful cholecystitis cases with the original GW manipulator, 1 of 8 cases succeeded in the manipulator exchange. Including 6 cases who changed GW after the manipulator exchange, 11 of 16 cases succeeded in changing GW. There was significant difference in the success rate between the manipulator exchange and GW exchange (p = 0.03). The insertion of devices and stent placement after biliary cannulation (regardless of type) were almost completed with M-through. We observed no intraoperative GW-related adverse events such as perforation and bleeding due to manipulation. Conclusion: The 0.025 inch M-Through can be used for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related procedures efficiently and safely. Our study found high rates of success without GW exchange in all procedures except for endoscopic drainage for cholecystitis. This GW is considered (1) excellent for supportability of device insertion to remove CBD stones; (2) good for seeking the biliary malignant stricture but sometimes need the help of a hydrophilic GW; (3) suboptimal for gallbladder drainage that require a high level of seeking ability. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Pancreato-Biliary Interventional Endoscopy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop