Search Results (10)

Background/Objectives: Pre-hospital delivery is an unpredictable event posing significant challenges for Emergency Medical Services (EMS) teams. Despite advances in perinatal care, emergency deliveries outside the hospital environment remain associated with increased maternal and neonatal risks. This study aimed to identify predictors of out-of-hospital delivery in EMS-attended labor cases and determinants of neonatal condition immediately after delivery. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 5097 EMS records of laboring women in Poland from August 2021 to January 2022, of which 2927 were included in the final study sample. Multivariate logistic regression models with multiple imputation for missing data were used to identify predictors of pre-hospital delivery and adverse neonatal condition (Apgar ≤ 7) in EMS-managed childbirths. Results: Pre-hospital delivery was strongly associated with second-stage labor (OR ≈ 535; p < 0.0001), ruptured membranes (OR ≈ 8.7; p < 0.0001), and fewer previous pregnancies (OR = 0.86; p = 0.018), and showed a trend with higher maternal heart rate (OR = 1.015; p = 0.083). Neonatal status classified as Apgar ≤ 7 was significantly associated with preterm birth (p < 0.0001), absence of fetal movements (OR ≈ 26.4; p = 0.025), and complications during pregnancy (p = 0.036). Complications during labor and lack of prenatal care were not significantly associated with increased risk of pre-hospital delivery in the model. Conclusions: Rupture of membranes, second-stage labor, and fewer previous pregnancies are significant predictors of pre-hospital delivery in EMS-managed cases. Absence of fetal movements and preterm gestation predict worse neonatal outcomes (Apgar ≤ 7). Early identification of these factors may enhance prehospital perinatal care and improve maternal and neonatal prognosis. Full article

Introduction: Postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) is a leading cause of maternal mortality worldwide, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, complicating 1% to 10% of deliveries. Despite improvement in prevention and management, variations in PPH definitions and measurement methods contribute to challenges in accurately assessing its incidence, with up to 90% of PPH-related deaths in high-income countries deemed avoidable through timely intervention. Oxytocin is the primary drug administered during labour or miscarriage, causing an increase in uterine muscle tone, which reduces bleeding and the risk of complications. The aim of the study was to assess the rate of oxytocin use by paramedics for out-of-hospital births in Poland and to verify adherence to WHO-recommended protocols for preventing postpartum haemorrhage in emergency prehospital settings. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study using data from the Polish Central System for Emergency Medical Services Missions Monitoring covering all EMS interventions nationwide from 2018 to 2023. The study included cases where oxytocin was administered during EMS interventions for pregnant women, identified through ICD-10 codes (O30–O92), with 62 verified cases meeting the inclusion criteria. Results: Over 6 years, oxytocin was administered in 62 cases when paramedics responded to emergencies involving pregnant women. The mean age of the patients to whom the oxytocin was administered was 29.48 years (SD = 6.25) and ranged from 15 to 43 years. Conclusions: Oxytocin is rarely administered by EMS teams at the prehospital stage. Oxytocin should be considered for incorporation into the set of medications that EMS teams can administer in prehospital settings. There is a need to train EMS teams in the management of pregnancy-related emergencies in accordance with the current medical guidelines. Full article

Background/Objectives: While neonatal morbidities associated with early preterm birth are known, the risks of maternal morbidities in these births remain unclear. Thus, we set out to assess the risk of maternal morbidities associated with early preterm births. Methods: Retrospective cohort study utilizing the United States (US) Natality Live Birth database from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2016–2021). Low-risk singleton pregnancies were included. High-risk conditions such as out-of-hospital births, fetal anomalies, pregestational and gestational diabetes, and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy were excluded. The rates of several maternal morbidities were compared among three gestational age at birth groups: 23 0/7–27 6/7 (i.e., extreme preterm), 28 0/7–33 6/7 (i.e., early preterm), and 37 0/7–41 6/7 (i.e., term, reference group) weeks. Multivariable logistic regression was used to adjust outcomes for potential confounders. Data were presented as adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: 18,797,394 live births were analyzed. Extreme and early preterm birth were associated with increased odds of maternal transfusion (aOR 3.32, 95% CI 3.13–3.53 and aOR 2.96, 95% CI 2.86–3.07), uterine rupture (aOR 3.75, 95% CI 3.14–4.48 and aOR 4.13, 95% CI 3.76–4.54), unplanned hysterectomy (aOR 5.60, 95% CI 4.85–6.48 and aOR 5.92, 95% CI 5.47–6.40), and maternal admission to the intensive care unit (ICU, aOR 10.58, 95% CI 9.97–11.54 and aOR 10.13, 95% CI 9.77–10.50) compared to term birth. The odds of third- or fourth-degree perineal lacerations were decreased in both preterm birth groups compared to term birth. Conclusions: In addition to the known prematurity-related neonatal morbidities, extreme and early preterm births also impose a risk for maternal morbidities. Higher odds of maternal transfusion, uterine rupture, unplanned hysterectomy, and maternal admission to the ICU were detected in our cohort. These data should be taken into consideration when caring for patients with preterm births. Full article

Planned out-of-hospital births, facilitated by highly skilled and experienced midwives, offer expectant parents a distinct opportunity to partake in a personalized, intimate, and empowering birth experience. Many parents opt for the care provided by midwives who specialize in supporting home births. This retrospective study is based on 41,335 EMS emergency calls to women in advanced pregnancy, of which 209 concerned home birth situations documenting obstetrical emergencies over four years (January 2018 to December 2022), of which 60 involved the assistance of a midwife. Data were obtained from the Polish Central System for Emergency Medical Services Missions Monitoring, encompassing all EMS interventions in pregnant women. The most frequent reason for emergency calls for obstetrical emergencies with the assistance of a midwife was a failure to separate the placenta or incomplete afterbirth (18 cases; 30%), followed by perinatal haemorrhage (12 cases; 20%) and deterioration of the newborn’s condition (8 cases; 13%). Paramedic-staffed EMS teams conducted most interventions (43 cases; 72%), with only 17 (28%) involving the presence of a physician. Paramedics with extensive medical training and the ability to provide emergency care are in a unique position that allows them to play a pivotal role in supporting planned out-of-hospital births. The analysed data from 2018–2022 show that EMS deliveries in Poland are infrequent and typically uncomplicated. Continuing education, training, and adequate funding are required to ensure the EMS is ready to provide the best care. EMS medical records forms should be adapted to the specific aspects of care for pregnant patients and newborns. Full article

Smart glasses (SG) could be a breakthrough in emergency situations, so the aim of this work was to assess the potential benefits of teleassistance with smart glasses (SG) from a midwife to a lifeguard in a simulated, unplanned, out-of-hospital birth (OHB). Thirty-eight lifeguards were randomized into SG and control (CG) groups. All participants were required to act in a simulated imminent childbirth with a maternal–fetal simulator (PROMPT Flex, Laerdal, Norway). The CG acted autonomously, while the SG group was video-assisted by a midwife through SG (Vuzix Blade, New York, NY, USA). The video assistance was based on the OHB protocol, speaking and receiving images on the SG. The performance time, compliance with the protocol steps, and perceived performance with the SG were evaluated. The midwife’s video assistance with SG allowed 35% of the SG participants to perform the complete OHB protocol. No CG participant was able to perform it (p = 0.005). All OHB protocol variables were significantly better in the SG group than in the CG (p < 0.05). Telemedicine through video assistance with SG is feasible so that a lifeguard with no knowledge of childbirth care can act according to the recommendations in a simulated, unplanned, uncomplicated OHB. Communication with the midwife by speaking and sending images to the SG is perceived as an important benefit to the performance. Full article

The choice of birthplace may have an important impact on a woman’s health. In this longitudinal study, we investigated the psychopathological risk factors that drive women’s choice of birthplace, since their influence is currently not well understood. The research was conducted in 2011/12 and we analyzed data of 177 women (obstetric unit, n = 121; free standing midwifery unit, n = 42; homebirth, n = 14). We focused antepartally (M  = 34.3 ± 3.3) on sociodemographic and risk factors of psychopathology, such as prenatal distress (Prenatal Distress Questionnaire), depressiveness (Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale), birth anxiety (Birth Anxiety Scale), childhood trauma (Childhood Trauma Questionnaire), and postpartally (M = 6.65 ± 2.6) on birth experience (Salmon’s Item List), as well as psychological adaption, such as postpartum depressive symptoms (Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale) and birth anxiety felt during birth (modified Birth Anxiety Scale). Women with fear of childbirth and the beginning of birth were likely to plan a hospital birth. In contrast, women with fear of touching and palpation by doctors and midwives, as well as women with childhood trauma, were more likely to plan an out-of-hospital birth. Furthermore, women with planned out-of-hospital births experienced a greater relief of their birth anxiety during the birth process than women with planned hospital birth. Our results especially show that women with previous mental illnesses, as well as traumatic experiences, seem to have special needs during childbirth, such as a safe environment and supportive care. Full article

Policy decisions about the accessibility of home birth hinge on questions of safety and affordability. Families consider safety and cost along with the comfort and familiarity of birthing venues. A substantial literature addresses safety concerns, generally reporting that for low-risk mothers in the care of credentialed midwives, the safety of planned home births is comparable to that in birth centers and hospitals. The lack of notable safety tradeoffs for low-risk mothers elevates the relevance of the economic efficiency of home births. The available cost figures for home births are largely out of date or anecdotal. The purpose of this research is to offer scholars, policymakers, and families improved estimates of both the cost of home births and the potential savings from greater access to home births. On the basis of a nationwide study, we estimate that the average cost of a home birth in the United States is USD 4650, which is significantly below existing cost estimates for an uncomplicated birth center or hospital birth. Further, we find that each shift of one percent of births from hospitals to homes would represent an annual cost savings to society of at least USD 321 million. Full article

Background: The present observational study aimed to describe women and delivery characteristics and early birth outcomes according to planned out-of-hospital delivery and to compare this information with comparable planned in-hospital deliveries. Methods: 1099 healthy low-risk women who delivered out-of-hospital between 2014 to 2018, with a gestational age of 37–42 completed weeks of pregnancy, with single, vertex babies whose birth was expected to be vaginal and spontaneous were enrolled. Moreover, a case-control study was designed comparing characteristics of these births to a matched 1:5 sample. Results: living in a medium city (RR 1.81, 95% CI 1.19–2.74), being multiparous (RR 1.66, CI 1.09–2.51), having the first child at ≥35 years old (RR 1.84, CI 1.02–3.33), not working (RR 1.77, CI 1.06–2.96), not being omnivorous (RR 1.80, CI 1.08–3.00), and not smoking (RR 2.53, CI 1.06–6.07) were all related to an increased chance of delivering at home compared to in a freestanding midwifery unit. The significant factors in choosing to give birth out-of-hospital instead of in-hospital were living in a large or medium city (OR 2.20; 1.75–2.77; OR 2.41; 1.93–3.02) and having a secondary or higher level of education (OR > 2 for both parents). Within the first week of delivery, 6 of 1099 mothers and 19 of 1099 neonates were hospitalized. Conclusions: out-of-hospital births in women with low-risk pregnancies is a possible option that needs to be planned, monitored, regulated, and evaluated according to healthcare control systems in order to work, as in hospitals, for the safest and most effective care to a mother and her neonate(s). Full article

The unpredictable nature of childbirth infrequently results in unplanned out-of-hospital birth, in a pre-hospital setting. We evaluated the perinatal and long-term outcome of children accidentally born out-of-hospital. This was a population-based analysis of singleton deliveries occurring at a single tertiary hospital. The maternal characteristics and pregnancy outcome of unplanned out-of-hospital births were compared with in-hospital attended deliveries. Long-term cumulative incidence of hospitalizations (up to 18 years) involving respiratory, neurological, endocrine or infectious morbidity were evaluated using Kaplan–Meier survival curves and Cox regression models were used to control for confounders. In total, 243,682 deliveries were included, and 1.5% (n = 3580) were unplanned out-of-hospital births. Most occurred in multiparous women, and about a quarter of these women had inadequate prenatal care. Perinatal mortality rate was significantly higher for out-of-hospital births as compared with in-hospital births (OR = 2.9; 95% CI 2.2–3.8, p < 0.001). Kaplan–Meier survival curves demonstrated a significantly lower cumulative incidence of hospitalizations of children born out-of-hospital and the Cox models showed that hospitalization rates involving any of the above morbidities were significantly lower in children born out-of-hospital. While perinatal mortality was higher in unplanned out-of-hospital births, offspring born out-of-hospital showed a lower incidence of hospitalizations involving a variety of morbidities, possibly owing to under-utilization of healthcare services in this population. Full article

Several studies have examined women’s perceptions and experiences of out-of-hospital births, that is, births that take place at home or in birthing centers overseen by midwives. However, White women have primarily been the subject of these investigations. Black women are underrepresented among mothers who have out-of-hospital births, yet they provide an intriguing case for this birthing practice, given their elevated maternal mortality rates and the general rise in home and birth-center births since 2005. This study utilizes a split-sample design to compare the experiences of Black American women who gave birth in out-of-hospital and within-hospital settings in San Antonio, Texas. San Antonio is an excellent site for such an inquiry, as Black women are a decided racial minority in this Latino-dominated city, and often face healthcare access challenges. Drawing on insights from theories of intersectionality and power, this study uses in-depth interviews to explore how patient-provider power asymmetries emerge and are negotiated by Black American mothers who have out-of-hospital births, in contrast to their hospital-birthing peers. Narratives reveal that patient-provider power relations and asymmetries exist both within and outside of hospital settings, but are distinctly manifested in each setting. Out-of-hospital births are more mother-centered, but power machinations are more covert in such settings. Participants employ various forms of resistance to negotiate asymmetrical relationships with providers. Full article