Search Results (3)

This study describes a consistency-based approach for multiperson decision-making (MPDM) in which decision-makers’ suggestions are expressed as incomplete interval-valued fuzzy preference relations. The presented approach utilizes Lukasiewicz’s t-norm in conjunction with additive reciprocity to obtain comprehensive interval valued fuzzy preference relations from each expert, and the transitive closure formula also produces L-consistency. We would evaluate the consistency weights of the experts using consistency analysis. Experts are allocated final priority weights by combining the consistency weights and preset weights. A collective consistency matrix is then constructed from the weighted sum of preference matrices. After computing the possibility degrees, the normalization procedure is utilized to generate complimentary matrices, and the final ranking values of alternatives are derived as well. Finally, a numerical example demonstrates the efficacy of the suggested approach following a comparison analysis. Full article

This paper presents an improved consensus-based procedure to handle multi-person decision making (MPDM) using hesitant fuzzy preference relations (HFPRs) which are not in normal format. At the first level, we proposed a ukasiewicz transitivity ($T_L$-transitivity) based scheme to get normalized hesitant fuzzy preference relations (NHFPRs), subject to which, a consensus-based model is established. Then, a transitive closure formula is defined to construct $T_L$-consistent HFPRs and creates symmetrical matrices. Following this, consistency analysis is made to estimate the consistency degrees of the information provided by the decision-makers (DMs), and consequently, to assign the consistency weights to them. The final priority weights vector of DMs is calculated after the combination of consistency weights and predefined priority weights (if any). The consensus process concludes whether the aggregation of data and selection of the best alternative should be originated or not. The enhancement mechanism is indulged in improving the consensus measure among the DMs, after introducing an identifier used to locate the weak positions, in case of the poor consensus reached. In the end, a comparative example reflects the applicability and the efficiency of proposed scheme. The results show that the proposed method can offer useful comprehension into the MPDM process. Full article

In this paper, a consensus-based method for multi-person decision making (MPDM) using product transitivity with incomplete fuzzy preference relations (IFPRs) is proposed. Additionally, an average aggregation operator has been used at the first level to estimate the missing preference values and construct the complete fuzzy preference relation (FPR). Then it is confirmed to be product consistent by using the transitive closure formula. Following this, weights of decision makers (DMs) are evaluated by merging consistency weights and predefined priority weights (if any). The consistency weights for the DMs are estimated through product consistency investigation of the information provided by each DM. The consensus process determines whether the selection procedure should be initiated or not. The hybrid comprises of a quitting process and feedback mechanism, and is used to enhance the consensus level amongst DMs in case of an inadequate state. The quitting process arises when some DMs decided to leave the course, and is common in MPDM while dealing with a large number of alternatives. The feedback mechanism is the main novelty of the proposed technique which helps the DMs to improve their given preferences based on this consistency. At the end, a numerical example is deliberated to measure the efficiency and applicability of the proposed method after the comparison with some existing models under the same assumptions. The results show that proposed method can offer useful comprehension into the MPDM process. Full article