Search Results (3)

The steep incline in the rising need for sustainable construction materials has marked the emerging trend of comprehensive research on utilizing waste glass powder (WGP) as a partial substitute for fine aggregates, such as cement, and coarse aggregates in concrete preparation. This review thoroughly examines WGP-incorporated concrete in terms of its mechanical and durability properties. It explores compressive, tensile, and flexural strength, as well as its resistance to freeze–thaw cycles, sulfate attack, and chloride ion penetration. The characteristic microstructure densification, strength development, and durability performance can be attributed to the pozzolanic activity of WGP that forms additional calcium silicate hydrate (C-S-H). The review also highlights the optimal replacement levels of WGP to balance mechanical performance and long-term stability while addressing potential challenges, such as alkali–silica reaction (ASR) and reduced workability at high replacement ratios. By consolidating recent research findings, this study highlights the feasibility of WGP as a sustainable supplementary cementitious material (SCM), promoting eco-friendly construction while mitigating environmental concerns associated with glass waste disposal. Full article

The construction industry’s escalating environmental footprint, coupled with the underutilization of construction waste streams, necessitates innovative approaches to sustainable material design. This study investigates the dual functionality of recycled clay brick powder (RCBP) as both a supplementary cementitious material (SCM) and an alkali–silica reaction (ASR) inhibitor in hybrid mortar systems incorporating recycled glass (RG) and recycled clay brick (RCB) aggregates. Leveraging the pozzolanic activity of RCBP’s residual aluminosilicate phases, the research quantifies its influence on mortar durability and mechanical performance under varying substitution scenarios. Experimental findings reveal a nonlinear relationship between RCBP dosage and mortar properties. A 30% cement replacement with RCBP yields a 28-day activity index of 96.95%, confirming significant pozzolanic contributions. Critically, RCBP substitution ≥20% effectively mitigates ASRs induced by RG aggregates, with optimal suppression observed at 25% replacement. This threshold aligns with microstructural analyses showing RCBP’s Al³⁺ ions preferentially reacting with alkali hydroxides to form non-expansive gels, reducing pore solution pH and silica dissolution rates. Mechanical characterization reveals trade-offs between workability and strength development. Increasing RCBP substitution decreases mortar consistency and fluidity, which is more pronounced in RG-RCBS blends due to glass aggregates’ smooth texture. Compressively, both SS-RCBS and RG-RCBS mortars exhibit strength reduction with higher RCBP content, yet all specimens show accelerated compressive strength gain relative to flexural strength over curing time. Notably, 28-day water absorption increases with RCBP substitution, correlating with microstructural porosity modifications. These findings position recycled construction wastes and glass as valuable resources in circular economy frameworks, offering municipalities a pathway to meet recycled content mandates without sacrificing structural integrity. The study underscores the importance of waste synergy in advancing sustainable mortar technology, with implications for net-zero building practices and industrial waste valorization. Full article

The alkali–silica reaction (ASR) is a critical concern for concrete durability, yet its assessment remains challenging and directly impacts mixture design decisions. This review shows that the inconsistencies are more prevalent in mitigation evaluations compared to aggregate reactivity assessments, mainly due to the chemical variations in supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs). A validated framework is suggested to determine the optimal SCM replacement levels for ASR mitigation based on extensive field data, offering direct guidance for mix design decisions involving potentially reactive aggregates. The combination of the accelerated mortar bar test (AMBT) and the miniature concrete prism test (MCPT) is shown to be a reliable alternative for the concrete prism test (CPT) in aggregate reactivity. Also, their extended versions, AMBT (28-day) and MCPT (84-day), can be applied for SCMs mitigation evaluation. Given the slower reactivity of SCMs compared to ordinary Portland cement (OPC), the importance of incorporating indirect test methods, such as the modified R3 test and bulk resistivity is underscored. In addition, emerging sustainability shifts further complicate ASR assessment, including the adoption of Portland limestone cement (PLC), the use of seawater in concrete, and the declining availability of fly ash (FA) and slag. These changes call for updated ASR testing specifications and increased research into natural pozzolans (NPs) as promising SCMs for future ASR mitigation. Full article